This year's Nobel Prize laureates gather for a talk about research, motivation and the future. Hosted by BBC World's Zeinab Badawi. Recorded in Grünewalds Hall at Konserthuset in Stockholm.
She was trying to hold a conversation and include everyone you try holding a conversation with at least two people on TV and infront of an audience let's see how you do!
James Allison seems like such a good soul. It must be really special to save people from dying of cancer after you lost many familymembers to cancer and experienced it yourself. I think these experiences gave him a lot of empathy that a lot of doctors and researchers in this field are unfortunately lacking of too often.
I really wanted one of these laureates to suddenly jump up, exclaim, 'excuse me but I have just had an amazing idea and I need to do an experiment right away!', do a victory lap of the round table while shaking their fist in triumph and then run out the exit.
The disagreement on science level (or hierarchy) is the highlight of this year Nobel Minds. Wish some deeper discussions on this would be in another session.
33:05 More of this! Fascinating watching intelligent people get into disagreements... In future, the mod should focus on setting up these type of situations in the discussion.
Kaes Disagreement followed by respect and productive debate is how we challenge each other to think...... it’s the ability to respectfully consider the respectful objections, and debates that defines the examples we should be following.... after all, if two people agree 100% on everything being discussed, then one of those two people are not a necessary part of the discussion.
This would be useful if you wanna make this work like a filter to come to one better agreement, but rather nobel minds is more about inspiring and giving hope to the watchers and doing this you can't focus on negativity like disagreements.
Through intelligence and collaboration with the intent of serving and improving the quality of human life, society will progress to a better future in a greater spectrum.
Theres a time limit for every interview. If they remained on one topic the conversation would not progress. More questions are asked and answered if the time is managed. So please stop going on about how the host is talking to much
This channel is inspiring and well set up. All of the videos leading up this have been amazing, pretty formal and highly academic. But this host's energy and bubblyness puts the cherry on top, it always manages to put the Laureates at ease enough to express themselves in a down to Earth less-serious manner, which is a side of their personalities we'd also like to witness. I now study physics due to the advice given from your Nobel minds videos. Thank you so much for allowing us to witness this every year, very motivating.
It seems there are two answers. Either they didn't get to watch what they (the people who disliked the video) wanted to watch hence disliked it or they loved it so much and their jealousy went high up uncontrollably to hit the dislike button. I was looking for some other explanation but I can't find other than these. Another thing to note, the video didn't even get much viewer and that is unsettling😞.
Brilliant minds! it is really nice to hear some free discussion so great people. I have one question... Marie Curie was not a Polish woman, born in Poland and immigrated to France, where she lived, studied and worked?
20:35 they mention Borges' Babel Library story, (very much recommend it to read btw), which is ironic, siince the academy refused many times to laurate J.L. Borges with the Nobel Award (probably due to his political and economics ideology)....
Yet they all believe CO2 is the sole cause of global warming and think Marxism is the solution. But hey, they are rich and famous. They can take a few dollars more for the planet. Why not everybody else?
@@don2647 It starts at 6:50. You have two those ecognomists who for some reason sit at the table of Nobel prize winners and talk about politics. 7:40 "Institutional inventions. When we invent new regulations. New regulations to steer the economy. Raising the price of fossil fuels for people. You need to raise price of basic human necessities so that people consume less. But it does not have to be a tax!" 11:55 "It is not possible to keep this level of living." That is what North Vietnamese claimed when they conquered South Vietnam and then sent people to gulags "And we have to introduce some incentive to make people poor." 11:25 "So how do you recommend we silence people when they protest? Tax hurt them." 11:45 "You force them to pay the tax. Start small, grow big, like every government. The machinery of carbon tax." Do you know what happens when your arm gets stuck in cogs? You have a bunch of people who conspire to throw most people back into the 1950s and everybody is fine with that. Well, Frances Arnold has the courage to say we can invent new technologies, not just tax people to death. You know, back in the days, Marxists/Communists promised a better future and delivered misery. These Marxists promise misery and I do not think they are going to deliver the opposite. I mean, it is logical. By far the most effective way to lower emission is to gas people with Zyklon B. I wonder who is going to take the bullet for the planet.
@@kofola9145 But you're not actually contributing to the well-being of the world as much as these brilliant minds do by complaining and doubting do you? I can see so much of your prejudice to them than I am to you. Smh.
Nobel committee should do a weekly or monthly interview with winners one on one. If there were more than once a year, it woudl gain viewership. I would volunteer to interview winners if they would just get me the invites to meet the winners! Great minds.
To listen to the most brilliant minds . A Privilege. I knew one personally when young . Sir Alexander Fleming . Penicillin discovery by accident. The most modest unassuming person. Like these people.
That would be an amazing program, but no host is needed beside doing an introduction with the questions. They would answer them all i'm sure, then it would get really interesting to let those guys flows and see how far they go in their reflexion without behing interrupted.
@@downo She try too hard to be part of this and those great minds are so polite they go with it but you can see that they are restrain from really exchanging, they know eachother works etc.. such a shame
I disagree, as I think that this kind of debate needs a moderator. One of the reasons for that is limited time. The other is accessibility. Without those limitations, the great minds seated at the table would handle the discussion, no doubt, but it would not be an ideal format for this particular thing they're doing, viz. enabling a general audience to have a glimpse at the intricate, immensely complicated achievements in science, which then led to handing out of Nobel Prizes. Having said that, in a different format, a group of unhinged scientists would certainly be a sight and sound to behold.
One day... Bolivian scientists are winning a Nobel prize in sciences. But, with or without a Nobel, we have to work continously for Humankind wellness. Wisdom and knowledge is our goal.
I would listen to this as a podcast. Just need to stop interrupting and let the conversation flow. Nobel Laureates each week debating on issues. Their ideas and great minds used together could probably save our planet. Just a thought
Some feedback for the channel: The description of this video should be populated with some details (including a link to a profile on the website) for the prize winners in this discussion panel.
A reasonable request! Here's a playlist that contains a wealth of material from the 2018 Nobel Prize week: th-cam.com/play/PLJE9rmV1-0uDA6ib0Ug7gtBteEPKlJqIt.html - Thanks for watching!
@@NobelPrize Thanks so much for considering my idea! That's a pretty awesome list! Amazing idea to bring the best scientific minds in the world and let them talk to each other. Have a great day!
This year’s Nobel minds discussion is fantastic! Personally I don’t like Zainab style of moderating, but tonight she was great. In fact, Paul Romer would have done all the talking, if she wasn’t there.
Did anyone else notice the CUT at 11:26 where Gerard Mourou was talking about reducing consumption-.... I have a very strong impression that he was going to say something about animal products / meat / fish / dairy. Does anybody know what he went on to say? And if my guess is correct, how come The BBC is once again avoiding the topic of animal product consumption? Sponsorships?
Don't miss Nobel Minds 2022 with this year's class of laureates. See it here: th-cam.com/video/LutI8YqJkqM/w-d-xo.html
This should be a 3 or 4 hour discussion.
hell yeah !
I agree. 100 percent. Nobel Prize people I hope you're reading this.
Agree
It's so compelling. I would watch these people talk like it was a movie
theyre playing god, using bactophage to engineer human DNA.
She did much better this year! Keep it up lady.
True..she let them discuss
Past year it was better imo
Still loves the sound of her own voice.....and the melodramatic hand gestures are still obnoxious.
@@SamJohn52 She is a host....? and they have a budgeted amount of time, you try engaging them all in so many different discussions under an hour
The producer just gave more time, the presenter doesn’t control the time for a discussion.
I love these panels! Imagine watching these in 100 years time. Also, hostess improved greatly since last time.
One of the most self realizing and more importantly,human timeline realizing comments I have ever read... thank you man
What happened last time ?
She Did?
& therE's fOInG to B anothER
💯
Years
She was trying to hold a conversation and include everyone you try holding a conversation with at least two people on TV and infront of an audience let's see how you do!
One of the best and most hopeful things I've watched all year. Thanks Nobel Committee and TH-cam.
I will too, to be able to listen to these magnificent people will lighten up my day for sure.
James Allison seems like such a good soul. It must be really special to save people from dying of cancer after you lost many familymembers to cancer and experienced it yourself. I think these experiences gave him a lot of empathy that a lot of doctors and researchers in this field are unfortunately lacking of too often.
I wish the host had let it go a bit further
If knowledge had mass, that table would be a black hole.
Thats a good one
Best discrbtion
well said
41:24 my heart hurts when George is being so heart-warmingly funny and barely no one share the laughs with him.
That's true, but I feel sorry for James Allison too - he seems so shy, like an alone kid in school. Someone should hug him :D
I really wanted one of these laureates to suddenly jump up, exclaim, 'excuse me but I have just had an amazing idea and I need to do an experiment right away!', do a victory lap of the round table while shaking their fist in triumph and then run out the exit.
The disagreement on science level (or hierarchy) is the highlight of this year Nobel Minds. Wish some deeper discussions on this would be in another session.
I think this year's Nobel minds has been very interesting to watch
40:00 just look at the young girl in the background. She seems truly inspired
So would i
She is beaming with admiration in her eyes
she seems to light up whenever Arnold speaks and she looks like her. btw, you like her, don't you ? :D
How old is she?
33:05 More of this! Fascinating watching intelligent people get into disagreements... In future, the mod should focus on setting up these type of situations in the discussion.
Kaes Disagreement followed by respect and productive debate is how we challenge each other to think...... it’s the ability to respectfully consider the respectful objections, and debates that defines the examples we should be following.... after all, if two people agree 100% on everything being discussed, then one of those two people are not a necessary part of the discussion.
This would be useful if you wanna make this work like a filter to come to one better agreement, but rather nobel minds is more about inspiring and giving hope to the watchers and doing this you can't focus on negativity like disagreements.
Sheldon Cooper, is it you?
Everyone finds examples on their own field. There multiple and just one conversation at a time. Brilliant!
The grace around Frances Arnold is just amazing. Quite an intellectually stimulating discourse, fit for further pondering! #Nobelminds2018..
Well, I have to give credit where credit is due. This year the host wss amazing. She learned from last year.
This should Be the most watched video on youtube. Some of the best that humanity has to offer
What an exceptional host. Incredible! Must be so much pressure.
Handled gracefully.
The face of the hostess in minute 16:32 summarizes my whole experience while listening to these guys
I am fortunate to see this. Plenty of brains in one room. I was touched
My door only has a knocker.
Surely I should have a ‘No Bell’ award.
Through intelligence and collaboration with the intent of serving and improving the quality of human life, society will progress to a better future in a greater spectrum.
The startting music gives me chills and as if it were a celebration of innovation
just 45 minutes for those great scientists , and several hours for movie stars and football players .....unfair world
Enjoyed listening to great minds talking . A great year end treat.
The vibes this year are popping off
It is amazing to see how far these minds are propelling us forward as a species!
Nobel Minds 2017 is still the best
The most intelligent brains of
the world are around a table.
Thanks for the people who gives something new for our beautiful world.
I just finished watching 2017 and I missed those gentlemen who have strong personalities but calm
I agree 2017 was better
Thanks to Nobel committee and Nobel minds programme
Thank you
that music in the clips is so relaxing!!
Theres a time limit for every interview. If they remained on one topic the conversation would not progress. More questions are asked and answered if the time is managed.
So please stop going on about how the host is talking to much
Still my personal favourite episode
her line at 39:52 just gave me chills! They do make up at least 50% of the most brilliant minds.
Borges' library. An infinite reference to each philosophical question we have. Great discussion!
i´ve noticed the same....was Awesome
Thank you for this great show.
i really wish they could do more table meetings like this
This channel is inspiring and well set up. All of the videos leading up this have been amazing, pretty formal and highly academic. But this host's energy and bubblyness puts the cherry on top, it always manages to put the Laureates at ease enough to express themselves in a down to Earth less-serious manner, which is a side of their personalities we'd also like to witness. I now study physics due to the advice given from your Nobel minds videos. Thank you so much for allowing us to witness this every year, very motivating.
Why in the world did someone dislike this.
BotchedYourScreenNowDidYou
A 6 years old would does...
It seems there are two answers. Either they didn't get to watch what they (the people who disliked the video) wanted to watch hence disliked it or they loved it so much and their jealousy went high up uncontrollably to hit the dislike button. I was looking for some other explanation but I can't find other than these.
Another thing to note, the video didn't even get much viewer and that is unsettling😞.
@@habtamuyaze2568 your reasoning is impeccable, thank you for replying
BotchedYourScreenNowDidYou
Because it is scientifically proven that statistically some would.
The intro gives me Goosebumps.I wish I sit there one day In Sha Allah
Your time will come🤞🏾
thank you
I wish to be on the table one day 🥺🥺
I hope so in medicine, i see your passion in your channel and i know passion because i have it too so i hope us to put our touches in science one day
Brilliant minds! it is really nice to hear some free discussion so great people.
I have one question... Marie Curie was not a Polish woman, born in Poland and immigrated to France, where she lived, studied and worked?
These people are the pride of humanity.
Great talks. Very interesting to listen to.
Thanks for doing this Nobel minds
Superbly delightful discussion. Looking forward to next year
20:35 they mention Borges' Babel Library story, (very much recommend it to read btw), which is ironic, siince the academy refused many times to laurate J.L. Borges with the Nobel Award (probably due to his political and economics ideology)....
Intelligent density is too high in a single circle
Yet they all believe CO2 is the sole cause of global warming and think Marxism is the solution. But hey, they are rich and famous. They can take a few dollars more for the planet. Why not everybody else?
kof ola Do you have sources for those claims or time-stamps would be helpful too.
@@don2647 It starts at 6:50. You have two those ecognomists who for some reason sit at the table of Nobel prize winners and talk about politics.
7:40 "Institutional inventions. When we invent new regulations. New regulations to steer the economy. Raising the price of fossil fuels for people. You need to raise price of basic human necessities so that people consume less. But it does not have to be a tax!"
11:55 "It is not possible to keep this level of living." That is what North Vietnamese claimed when they conquered South Vietnam and then sent people to gulags "And we have to introduce some incentive to make people poor."
11:25 "So how do you recommend we silence people when they protest? Tax hurt them."
11:45 "You force them to pay the tax. Start small, grow big, like every government. The machinery of carbon tax." Do you know what happens when your arm gets stuck in cogs?
You have a bunch of people who conspire to throw most people back into the 1950s and everybody is fine with that. Well, Frances Arnold has the courage to say we can invent new technologies, not just tax people to death.
You know, back in the days, Marxists/Communists promised a better future and delivered misery. These Marxists promise misery and I do not think they are going to deliver the opposite. I mean, it is logical. By far the most effective way to lower emission is to gas people with Zyklon B. I wonder who is going to take the bullet for the planet.
@@kofola9145 But you're not actually contributing to the well-being of the world as much as these brilliant minds do by complaining and doubting do you? I can see so much of your prejudice to them than I am to you. Smh.
@@yoshicchiyoshi8370 Yes. Blind faith and ignorance.
well such interesting meeting but I think it would be more interesting if you add up some medial field guys perfect circle of knowledge
Brilliant minds
Hit like if you want to watch these guys play an session of D&D this year.
Good video and the introduction music is great too. Is there a name of the piece of music?
amazing video. Amazing minds
Nobel committee should do a weekly or monthly interview with winners one on one. If there were more than once a year, it woudl gain viewership. I would volunteer to interview winners if they would just get me the invites to meet the winners! Great minds.
Great minds and perfect host
This should last at least 1 more hour.
To listen to the most brilliant minds . A Privilege. I knew one personally when young . Sir Alexander Fleming . Penicillin discovery by accident. The most modest unassuming person. Like these people.
add the list of names, fields, and work in your description pretty please
The 2017 noble minds was epic . Just if could be for 3-4 hours 😞
Dziękuję
That would be an amazing program, but no host is needed beside doing an introduction with the questions. They would answer them all i'm sure, then it would get really interesting to let those guys flows and see how far they go in their reflexion without behing interrupted.
TOTALLY AGREE!! A host (which she isn't btw) is unnecessary!
@@downo She try too hard to be part of this and those great minds are so polite they go with it but you can see that they are restrain from really exchanging, they know eachother works etc.. such a shame
I disagree, as I think that this kind of debate needs a moderator. One of the reasons for that is limited time. The other is accessibility. Without those limitations, the great minds seated at the table would handle the discussion, no doubt, but it would not be an ideal format for this particular thing they're doing, viz. enabling a general audience to have a glimpse at the intricate, immensely complicated achievements in science, which then led to handing out of Nobel Prizes. Having said that, in a different format, a group of unhinged scientists would certainly be a sight and sound to behold.
One day... Bolivian scientists are winning a Nobel prize in sciences. But, with or without a Nobel, we have to work continously for Humankind wellness. Wisdom and knowledge is our goal.
Knowledge and curiosity is the new currency
Bravo romor
I'm economic students in Iran
Congratulations
Awesome Nobel Laureates and interviewer.
One of the greatest minds sitting there. Totally incredible.
That circle of minds almost caused a hole in time.
I would listen to this as a podcast. Just need to stop interrupting and let the conversation flow. Nobel Laureates each week debating on issues. Their ideas and great minds used together could probably save our planet. Just a thought
Some feedback for the channel: The description of this video should be populated with some details (including a link to a profile on the website) for the prize winners in this discussion panel.
A reasonable request! Here's a playlist that contains a wealth of material from the 2018 Nobel Prize week: th-cam.com/play/PLJE9rmV1-0uDA6ib0Ug7gtBteEPKlJqIt.html - Thanks for watching!
@@NobelPrize Thanks so much for considering my idea! That's a pretty awesome list! Amazing idea to bring the best scientific minds in the world and let them talk to each other. Have a great day!
Phenomenally versatile compeering.
Frances Arnold is such a remarkable scientist 😍😍😍
I love this interviews so much as I am starting to love science.
Its great!
Finally walter white has some reputation.
Beautiful
an incredible Group of Mover & shakers
They are this year's music makers ;)
This was really beautiful to watch!
you all are so interesting,thanks for this
43:24 Amazing!
She has been respectful this time.
Hello @NobelPrize I was wondering if I can upload this video with Spanish subtitles (my father want to see it but he doesn't know the language)
This year’s Nobel minds discussion is fantastic! Personally I don’t like Zainab style of moderating, but tonight she was great. In fact, Paul Romer would have done all the talking, if she wasn’t there.
shes this way in all of the roundtables you are wrong.
Paul Romer must be one of the most annoying people to
Work with. 😂
The American nobel winners are just too cool
Diverse intelligence fused with warm humble hearts ♥️. The passion & vision these people hold is outstanding.
It's very interesting 👌
This should be longer at least 2 hours...
Both my favorite ladies in a single frame... Love you Donna maam and Arnold maam 🧿✨🌼
Now, Imagine Donald Trump sitting among them.
Shubham Patil hey!! Hey!! Don’t do that 😂😂😂..
@John Smith hell yeah😂
But Trump has completely different goals during speches. Those winners wouldn't win an election.
@John Smith haha
he would challenge them!!
Terrific!
what a wonderful ending of the discussion!
the risk is too high to have so much intelligence in the same room!
people from 100 years later watching these videos is such a crazy thought
@37:52 Dr. Honjo winking slyly at Prof. Strickland
BotchedYourScreenNowDidYou lol
lolololololololololololololo
Grr. I though I have a hair in my screen... grrrr :D
Lol very funny bro, you must be the student that clowns in class 😅😅
Congratulation to all Nobel Prize winners. . Exceptional host. Exceptional discussion!
It would be cool to listen to them talking about other things besides their work. Space colonization, future of transport, Ai...
Did anyone else notice the CUT at 11:26 where Gerard Mourou was talking about reducing consumption-.... I have a very strong impression that he was going to say something about animal products / meat / fish / dairy. Does anybody know what he went on to say? And if my guess is correct, how come The BBC is once again avoiding the topic of animal product consumption? Sponsorships?
is it me or the edition of this video has a lot of bumps?