Europeans spend a lot of money on leisure, pets, sodas, oversized cars and all sort of luxuries. So, yes, we can afford to shoulder the costs. We're all in this together.
Well, but then again, the "developed" countries plunder those "underdeveloped" with companies that pay taxes and bring resources to them and they collude with dictators and the worst kind possible that guarantee the "developed" access to resources, keeping among other things, education as a priviledge, which prevent them from having strong institutions. So...there's that. You cause the illness and criticize its symptoms. Great.
When it comes to war those big countries spends hundred millions in month to kill people each other. Instead this they can spend their money to technology, and people can live in peace.
Tell the developing nations to go talk to China. The voters in the first world will not allow their governments to transfer billions to the 3rd world to pay for china's pollution
I wonder why "experts" regularly compare China's emissions per capita to Europe's? As far as I know, Europe is not a country, and individual European countries differ greatly in this regard. In addition, the structure of the European economy is significantly different from China's, especially recently😂🤣. The question is, what were the emissions of European countries when they were developing?🤔
There are some critical information left out here (intentionally?): 1. The US and NATO support of proxiy wars and war machines globally run in the hundreds of billions. Yet, the money for worldwide concerns is just too much for them. 2. It is the historical cumulative emissions in the atmosphere that largely contribute to Climate Change. Based on that scientific findings, the US ranks number one, followed by European countries like Germany, UK etc. Besides, their current high standard of living contributes substantially more than China and other developing nations, on per capita basis. That is not to mention emission due to consumption, regardless of country of origin. 3. Lastly, just wanna echo Greta Thunberg's likely response to Germany's climate envoy... "blah blah blah"
DW generally does good reporting on this issue, but here it missed a few key facts: the 250 billion is to be paid beginning in 2035, and the US is by far the largest historical emitter, and GHGs persist for a long time. But good explanation of why China and India are classified as developing countries.
@@Marc_Gagne ...and if a little bit is done. And even if we all relax. "This is the fastest climate change in earth history" (IPCC 2018) Large animals will probably not survive.
@@michaelkaleis1254THEY don't have to. Have a deep look into the history of industrialization. USA and EU are the all time largest ghg-Emitters. It is their part to pay for the damage they have done.
To improve the air quality , China has planted over 66 billion trees as part of its Great Green Wall project, which is the world's largest afforestation project: The Great Green Wall. But ... 🤣 2022-7-20 BBC: China is destroying the desert environment by planting trees in the desert . 😂 I am too s____ to understand BBC logic. Also known as the Three-North Shelterbelt Forest Programme, this project began in 1978 and is expected to be completed in 2050. The project's goals include: Slowing desertification in northern China Increasing forest cover from 5% to 15% Stabilizing water resources Absorbing carbon dioxide Providing local people with resources like timber and fruit .
So they give funding to developing countries to deal with climate change, while people in developed countries continue living with their standard lifestyles as usual ???
And you’re pro hurricane and cyclone and blizzard as well I assume? Because that’s what warmer water brings. Cyclone just hit Washington state in the Pacific Northwest.
Explain why the temperature at Venus & Mars are increasing over time -- with no Humans -- I already gave the answer on this channel -- Richard E. Lelli, P.E., M.B.A.
@@smasherblues5322 One more trillion will not destroy US, but if they will not spend climate change, and I think there will not enough peaceful place in US for living because of climate change.
Australia super worry, thousands of job will be lost. As China is continuously reducing coal purchase from Australia. International Energy Agency : from now to 2030, China's renewable energy installed capacity is expected to account for nearly 60% of the world's total installed capacity. By 2030, China will have more than half of the world's renewable energy ， and China’s solar energy output is equal to the entire nation’s consumption in the U$.
The US military alone emits more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than entire countries such as Denmark. But Washington said China has “overcapacity” on production of environmental friendly solar panel and EVs that help.
What about thinking this way for china and India, Hey dear wealthy people please stop promoting Inequality as we all know that it's all about having lobbying power for the democratic political fund distributions/charities or the R&D purposes...
@volkerengels5298 The climate changes in tandem with variations in solar activity. The number one "greenhouse gas" is water vapor. Your "plan" is a destructive joke.
@@AlterKaker-e2g Sun activity cannot explain a temp rise of 1.5K in 150 years. Such facts.... 😂😂 But you are right with the water vapor. Clap. Clap. Next on the GHG list is CO2, CH4, N2O. Mayor difference in their attribs is the time they stay in atmosphere... Go on with your research. 😂😂
![[#2024MAMA] G-DRAGON - 무제(Untitled, 2014)+POWER+HOME SWEET HOME+뱅뱅뱅+FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ox29z5Nf1Uk/mqdefault.jpg)
Not sure, but all those useless people flying to talk about it sure will help.
Amazing they can't zoom to save money
Yes. They should pay.
Them not paying. is just another scam to get money from ME and YOU.
Europe can not even afford a military to protect themselves, but they think this money will appear?
Europeans spend a lot of money on leisure, pets, sodas, oversized cars and all sort of luxuries. So, yes, we can afford to shoulder the costs. We're all in this together.
Europe is renowned for war addiction. They don't mind 3ww when 1st and 2ww ain't enough to satisfy war mongering.
Been to some underdeveloped country's. Most of the money us scammed off. You would have to treat them like hungry 6 years old and a pound of cookies.
Climate change is most dangerous for Europe!!
Well, but then again, the "developed" countries plunder those "underdeveloped" with companies that pay taxes and bring resources to them and they collude with dictators and the worst kind possible that guarantee the "developed" access to resources, keeping among other things, education as a priviledge, which prevent them from having strong institutions. So...there's that. You cause the illness and criticize its symptoms. Great.
Just stop the grift.
Just 250 billion, why not 100 trillion😂😂😂
maybe in Russian Rubbles
When it comes to war those big countries spends hundred millions in month to kill people each other. Instead this they can spend their money to technology, and people can live in peace.
You are not serious enough on the subject.
There was an Agreement made in Paris. If you Westerners want to cheat now....
Money is more important than saving the planet.
Take it or leave it 250 already sounds like a ridiculous amount to just give away
lol? they are dreaming wants $1T, cant even answer how much his country needs or what it would be used on.
NOT ONE DIME.
I’m sure higher taxes will solve everything. After all, government always knows best
/s
Tax the rich
Why should I a US citizen pay for a foreign country to bail them out ? No other country has helped us ?
Becouse the usa is a massive poluter and is in part resposible for climate change
250 billion per country or for all developing countries?
Rich people want poor and middle class people to pay to protect and build roads at their favorite beach resort countries.
How much money was pissed away on these useless talks? Did everyone there travel without adding to the so called climate change?
Your so called comment - is your personal opinion?
Your TIME! 👍
Governments will never have enough money because billionaires hide the fair share of their burden.
i want to see the repeatable climate change experiments. otherwise this is as science based as a rain dance.
Tell the developing nations to go talk to China. The voters in the first world will not allow their governments to transfer billions to the 3rd world to pay for china's pollution
How about all the people who believe in climate change donate and the rest keep their money.
Grato pela informação
Hope we help you out 😢
I wonder why "experts" regularly compare China's emissions per capita to Europe's? As far as I know, Europe is not a country, and individual European countries differ greatly in this regard. In addition, the structure of the European economy is significantly different from China's, especially recently😂🤣. The question is, what were the emissions of European countries when they were developing?🤔
Turkey 🇹🇷 support Palestine 🇵🇸
USA 🇺🇸 support Israel 🇮🇱
Respect to Turkey 🇹🇷
Shame on USA 🇺🇸
Getting my coal furnace ready for winter
More BS. Let’s just keep printing trillions of dollars and hand it out like gum drops. Get real people.
Well that’s Tump’s record and plan and people LOVE him!
Stop taking our money and wasting it!
There are some critical information left out here (intentionally?):
1. The US and NATO support of proxiy wars and war machines globally run in the hundreds of billions. Yet, the money for worldwide concerns is just too much for them.
2. It is the historical cumulative emissions in the atmosphere that largely contribute to Climate Change. Based on that scientific findings, the US ranks number one, followed by European countries like Germany, UK etc. Besides, their current high standard of living contributes substantially more than China and other developing nations, on per capita basis. That is not to mention emission due to consumption, regardless of country of origin.
3. Lastly, just wanna echo Greta Thunberg's likely response to Germany's climate envoy... "blah blah blah"
DW generally does good reporting on this issue, but here it missed a few key facts: the 250 billion is to be paid beginning in 2035, and the US is by far the largest historical emitter, and GHGs persist for a long time. But good explanation of why China and India are classified as developing countries.
Why not invest the money into sucking the green house gasses out of the atmosphere instead?
Because that tech is science fiction. It’s like .000001% of what’s needed.
So “a few millions” divided by 100,000 inhabitants works out to $30/person. Don’t be a beggar. Pay it yourself.
We all will soon enough pay the ultimate price.
😂😂😂👍👍👍
What is the price? Either way, it will be paid. There is no not paying.
countries like china and india will not pay at all and now america next year no thanks and good riddens
We will pay with our lives if nothing is done.
@@Marc_Gagne ...and if a little bit is done. And even if we all relax.
"This is the fastest climate change in earth history" (IPCC 2018) Large animals will probably not survive.
@@michaelkaleis1254THEY don't have to.
Have a deep look into the history of industrialization. USA and EU are the all time largest ghg-Emitters. It is their part to pay for the damage they have done.
What's the price of not dealing with climate change? Much higher.
Giving money to China didn't fix anything
Yes but no one talks about that
It’s unseasonably cold where I live today. Global warming would be welcome here.
To improve the air quality , China has planted over 66 billion trees as part of its Great Green Wall project, which is the world's largest afforestation project:
The Great Green Wall.
But ...
🤣 2022-7-20 BBC: China is destroying the desert environment by planting trees in the desert .
😂 I am too s____ to understand BBC logic.
Also known as the Three-North Shelterbelt Forest Programme, this project began in 1978 and is expected to be completed in 2050. The project's goals include:
Slowing desertification in northern China
Increasing forest cover from 5% to 15%
Stabilizing water resources
Absorbing carbon dioxide
Providing local people with resources like timber and fruit .
So they give funding to developing countries to deal with climate change, while people in developed countries continue living with their standard lifestyles as usual ???
i am pro warming, i live in a cold cold country and it helps my fishing business flow, cuz of the warmth in december
And you’re pro hurricane and cyclone and blizzard as well I assume? Because that’s what warmer water brings. Cyclone just hit Washington state in the Pacific Northwest.
Explain why the temperature at Venus & Mars are increasing over time -- with no Humans -- I already gave the answer on this channel -- Richard E. Lelli, P.E., M.B.A.
Well - the answer is BS. Now?
Trillion is nothing for america comparing to mobey spent on iraq or afganistan invasions
Really anyone didn't know about that?
35 trillion in debt. America doesnt have a trillion to waste.
@@smasherblues5322 I think more one trillion will not destroy US.
@@smasherblues5322 One more trillion will not destroy US, but if they will not spend climate change, and I think there will not enough peaceful place in US for living because of climate change.
Australia super worry, thousands of job will be lost.
As China is continuously reducing coal purchase from Australia.
International Energy Agency :
from now to 2030, China's renewable energy installed capacity is expected to account for nearly 60% of the world's total installed capacity.
By 2030, China will have more than half of the world's renewable energy ， and China’s solar energy output is equal to the entire nation’s consumption in the U$.
China building about 1 Coal Plant per week is probably buying from somewhere.
The price is nothing
Erdogan will print it😂😂😂
You pay then, don't take my money
The US military alone emits more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than entire countries such as Denmark.
But Washington said China has “overcapacity” on production of environmental friendly solar panel and EVs that help.
What about thinking this way for china and India, Hey dear wealthy people please stop promoting Inequality as we all know that it's all about having lobbying power for the democratic political fund distributions/charities or the R&D purposes...
Yeah, throw trillions down the sewer, to change solar activity.
That is not the plan. Try listening. :)) If have ears
@volkerengels5298 The climate changes in tandem with variations in solar activity. The number one "greenhouse gas" is water vapor. Your "plan" is a destructive joke.
@@AlterKaker-e2g Sun activity cannot explain a temp rise of 1.5K in 150 years. Such facts.... 😂😂
But you are right with the water vapor. Clap. Clap. Next on the GHG list is CO2, CH4, N2O. Mayor difference in their attribs is the time they stay in atmosphere... Go on with your research. 😂😂