@@adotte8014: how do you like it? My LH-300 is decent, but has intonation issues and is prone to sounding tinny. I can get it sounding pretty good, however, on its best days (as in the video).
@@davidwilliams4699 It,s a fully carved archtop giving a good full acoustic tone (I can,t afford an early thirties Gibson L5). I heard say that the Loar LH700 is nicer,but I heard one , and in my mind it,s only the cosmetic appearance.. The sound you produce on the LH300 is very very nice and has the proper decay. Most big bands use heavy sounding electrics either archtops or even solid bodies. I can,t stand it.
Very good guitar playing. Great rhythm sound. Exactly as it should be. Love it !
Thanks, I’ve worked hard on getting it right!
@@davidwilliams4699 I play the Loar LH600
@@adotte8014: how do you like it? My LH-300 is decent, but has intonation issues and is prone to sounding tinny. I can get it sounding pretty good, however, on its best days (as in the video).
@@davidwilliams4699 It,s a fully carved archtop giving a good full acoustic tone (I can,t afford an early thirties Gibson L5). I heard say that the Loar LH700 is nicer,but I heard one , and in my mind it,s only the cosmetic appearance.. The sound you produce on the LH300 is very very nice and has the proper decay. Most big bands use heavy sounding electrics either archtops or even solid bodies. I can,t stand it.