“DRIVING IS A PRIVILEGE!!” -Judge Fleischer REVOKES reckless driver’s license.
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.พ. 2025
- Judge Fleischer refused to give an arrogant driver a break in court.
#judgefleischer #recklessdriving #court #crime
@GavelGazers @LawAndCrime @LawByMike @AETV
This is honestly very reasonable.
"I don't want to be here.", yeah like the cop, prosecutor and other people in the courtroom want to be there! SMDH! What a stupid thing to say.
What do you expect lmao
I wouldn’t want him as employee as reckless as he is in a private vehicle how reliable is he at work. No regard for the welfare of others on the road including the police. This is not a mistake it’s a willful criminal act.
Love this judge!
135mph you lucky they didn't take the truck and sell it to that's insane to drive like that .
Running from the Cops?? 135 miles an hour?? How much insurance does he have?? This probably wasn’t the FIRST TIME.
Take the vehicle also . He’s not the type to follow the sentence.
This child has never had a consequence. I blame the parents for this burden to society.
In my country the car is taken too. This should be MINIMAL!
Should be in this country also.
I made a mistake??? No you ran doofus. 🤦♀️
He doesn't mean a word he says, that apology was so bogus he'll do again as soon as he gets behind the wheel
That's what he gets for being stupid putting other people's lives in harms way
135 mph, in a 09 Silverado?? horseshit
Ain't no way the Silverado is stock. Theres just no way it got up there naturally.
@@LordChromeGamingand there ain't no way a lumbering dinosaur of a truck is gonna be controllable at 135 MPH 😂😂
Oh well. Get bus pass cab Uber. Ride a bike to work. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes 💯🤦😂😂
How is he not happy that he's not being locked up?? What did he think was going to happen? The minute he said that was "a bit much," I would have given him the choice of no driving or becoming a cellmate for the next 12 months. Unbelievable...
"Then I guess you'll be riding an E-bike to work".
In other states he would be getting locked up.
STOP MAKING CARS THAT GO THAT FAST!!!!!!!
"a bit much"??? What was he hoping for? a slap on the wrist? He needs to learn accountability. Kudos to the judge.
Reckless driving charge is a felony
Sadly, in no state is Reckless Driving a felony. It is a high level misdemeanor. It only becomes a felony if people become injured or worse as a result of it.
No it is not. I have a reckless driving in PA and it was not a felony.
Whoever told u that is messing with u. It's a traffic offense lol. A felony is murder raped sexual assault armed robbery manslaughter etc, lol
Driver doesn't seem very sorry
135mph is 220kph or, as they say in German, "Tuesday".
It didn't say that he was driving at 135mph, that's how fast the police drove to catch up with him.
Don't be a moron
Does it matter? He was obviously really moving. What's reasonable to you? "Only 120? 110?
Well if cops are following at 135 mikes per hour then the defendant was probably going faster than 135 mpg.
@@patriciahawk2581if the cops were able to catch up when maxing out at 135mph then that means he was going slower or else they would have never been able to catch up
I can tell you a Silverado will not go over 100 miles an hour especially a 2009 Silverado
Yes yelpp
Lol at that bo tie. Lmao
That’s how those Silverados, Mustang, BMW, Audi drivers are thinking the road only belongs to them and driving fast for no reason, that’s right judge take way his driving privileges. These drivers don’t deserve to be on the road.
Make sure your not driving to slow like you own the road
@@legion24100or people drive the speed limit, how about that? There's a concept. You know there are people that NEED TO be in the left lane because they're eventually needing to turn into say, a neighborhood or a business. There are also DoorDash and Uber drivers, delivery trucks that try to drive more conservatively.
A Silverado going 135 mph down the road might has well been a freight train. Would have done the same damage if he it someone.
They're uncontrollable at 80 nm 135 , lumbering elephants 😂. My 99 S10 V6 Blazer is factory - governed to 94 MPH and even at that speed, with sport suspension, it's downright scary 😱
It was potentially 30 days in jail dude. Be contrite.
I don't think this was a sentence after being convicted. It was a restriction until trial. Guilty until proven innocent.
@@amerlin388 sorry but that's how it works. If the police send evidence to the DA's office and grand jury chooses to charge you sometimes there are bond restrictions, like at a minimum giving up your firearms for a while if you're accused of shooting someone, or maybe giving up your car if you're driving 135. Same difference.
Walmart Ronaldo
A cop car had that big of an issue catching a 16 year old PICKUP TRUCK???? 😂😂😂😂😂
Reved up 😘
Well . Some of those older cars, and trucks have 6.0 Built LS . how about an 84 Monte Carlo.with an LT4 supercharged . 69 chevelle . ZL1 engine and trans. We are getting paid to do LS swaps. My malibu station wagon has a 625 horse 427 in it.
Not to mention, there are other drivers that are most likely on the road, not an open racetrack!! The cops still have to avoid crashing into other people!!
Shredded? Lmao he took it easy on the kid
In Houston no license is a death sentence
What show is
This?
Walnaldo 🤣
Well I owned a 2006 Silverado and they are governed for 100MPH. So unless its modded. I don't believe it
Agreed. 135mph was how fast the police drove to catch up with him.
Either way... you think that's acceptable?
I'm pretty sure it's just a fuse and it wi go over that
He got shredded lol wtf
Isn't that
HERE IN OKLAHOMA
AN OKLAHOMAS HIGHWAY PATROL TROOP L TROOPER WAS RECKLESSLY FLYING DOWN AN OKLAHOMAS HIGHWAY AND WRECKED HIS OKLAHOMAS HIGHWAY PATROL WHITE DODGE CHARGER DOING OVER 130+ MILES PER HOUR FOR NO REASON AND WAS NOT CITED & OR WRITTEN UP 🆙 AND WAS ALLOWED TO KEEP HIS JOB AND HIS DRIVERS LICENSE
Was he running lights and siren? If not, he's no different than me or you.
@ he had no lights on. He was not on an emergency call either.
i would revoke him for 6 months to a year
Well now you get up earlier for work!!!!
Is Chevy Silverado doesn't go that fast it cuts off at 99. Unless it's underneath a 99 model
No it doesn't. I got a 2023 Silverado and I've had it up to 115 verified by my phones GPS
@@jag1963my 99 S10 V6 Blazer is governed to 94 MPH and that's fast enough in a lumbering elephant of a vehicle, sport suspension and all
Those trucks have factory limits of 99 mph 😊
What you wanna bet it was chipped or deleted? They can bypass that governed speed.
@@diachilders3271my 99 S10 V6 Blazer is governed to 94 MPH and even at that speed it's downright scary. I can't imagine 135 in a lumbering dinosaur of a truck.
If he where black, no option
Typical speed in Texas and Florida nothing new
Bullshiggidy!!!
Come on, Ronaldo... driver safer.
He talking bout it being a bit much for taking his driving privileges away . Mf lucky he didn’t go too jail and sell his truck
I thought that was Cristiano Ronaldo 😭
Someone wasn’t very smart.
Point out the facts. An officer doing 135 to catch up to someone doesn’t mean that’s the speed he was going. Most likely he was doing about 85-95. Definitely not abiding by the speed limit sign. But not reckless or careless driving.
Know the law and your rights my guy
"Someone want very smart." ??? Read your first sentence again, genius! 😂😂😂 @thegrandrapidsbest
I thought this was Christiano Ronaldo
So the way everything was worded the dude could have been going the speed limit The cop could have waited a second turned around to catch up to him because at no point did it state what he was driving they only stated what the cop car did. So so was this edited like horribly or is this all the information and no one caught it?
Win stupid prizes
Ronaldo?
A sorry don’t cut he but he tried, kiss your job good bye!
Dumb judge
Ronaldo
The State Attorney is playing word games. The guy wasn’t going 135. The cop was going 135 to catch up.
Driving is a right
So the cop was driving 135 miles an hour to catch up to a speeder. ROFLMFAO!!!
LEGAL MAXIM ● 𝑰𝑵 𝑾𝑯𝑨𝑻𝑬𝑽𝑬𝑹 𝑻𝑯𝑰𝑵𝑮 𝑶𝑵𝑬 𝑶𝑭𝑭𝑬𝑵𝑫𝑺, 𝑰𝑵 𝑻𝑯𝑨𝑻 𝑯𝑬 𝑰𝑺 𝑹𝑰𝑮𝑯𝑻𝑭𝑼𝑳𝑳𝒀 𝑻𝑶 𝑩𝑬 𝑷𝑼𝑵𝑰𝑺𝑯𝑬𝑫. (Black’s Law Dict. (Rev. 4th ed. 1968) p. 900, col. 1.)
All he was doing was speeding now he loses his driving privileges for I seeding ticket WFT.
135mph are you dense?
That’s not speeding that’s felony reckless driving among other things
@@CarterCandH just over speed limit, no big deal.
Driving isn’t a privilege it’s how we all live
Still a privilege…
Using the roads that everyone pays for is absolutely a privilege, you don’t get to be that dangerous and risk people’s lives without consequences. Vehicle accidents are one of the most common deaths in the US and it’s completely preventable: just drive safely. If you can’t do that that you don’t get to share the road with everyone else.
All he did was spending.
I dont think that any one should drive 135 miles per hour, not even the police. The police should slso be charged with reckless driving, they also drove 135 miles per hour. This is how inocent people get killed.
Its terrable if you drive 135 miles per hour, but its just fine if I drive 135 miles per hour. Thats why the police department gives me a high performance v8 engine car to drive that will go 200 miles per hour.
Its
You’re an idiot
This is normal in European countries, and they have way less auto accidents than we do here in the US
He is lucky he didn't kill someone. Question... An individual buys a vehicle, pays a tax on the purchase, plates, insurance, maintenance etc, plus the money to buy all this is taxed each time explain why driving is a privilege? Driving should not be a privilege but an earned and tax paid right.
noahide law jusge
Well I agree that he needs some sort of punishment but the judge is still wrong the Supreme Court has ruled operating a motor vehicle for personal use is a right not a privilege and the sooner people. Start researching this and finding out the facts the sooner they will stop overreaching their authority. But signing that contract with them to have a license the. You are bound to their laws
I wasn't able to find a SC case that rules that driving is a right. Bernard v. Minnesota, Birchfield v. North Dakota, and Beylund v. Levi skirted the issue, but limited their rulings to alcohol breath tests vs blood. SC did say people could travel under some interstate commerce statutes, but an individual's right to drive isn't protected. In other words, going from one place to another is fine, but driving yourself isn't a right. A lot of Sovereign Citizens use that argument incorrectly. Even if they were literally conducting interstate commerce, and not just traveling for personal reasons, they cannot claim they can drive themselves unencumbered by the laws of the land.
You’re making things up, or you listened to AI.
Rat
In a Silverado...I call bullshit that it managed 135