🔴 RENATO MOICANO vs BENOIS SAINT DENIS LIVE REACTION VERY VERY HUNGOVER

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 12

  • @Teecityafro
    @Teecityafro หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Made sense why Renato wasn’t doing so well on the feet, man’s was fighting with a broken shoulder

  • @Random-t6v
    @Random-t6v หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Kinda wild that Bisping and Shara Bullet were/are allowed to compete with only 1 functioning eye yet when one of BSD's eyes swells shut they call the fight and destroy his career. The logic does not add up...

    • @keion_arknights
      @keion_arknights หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Well they don't have anything to lose. BSD could lose that eye if the cut gets worse. Cuts that happen on the forehead that get too close to the eye get called all the time, a cut *on top* of the eyelid is crazy dangerous.

    • @kiewiikie
      @kiewiikie หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I could be wrong, but I think they weren't aware about Bisping's eye until he retired?

    • @thenedsmmachannel8970
      @thenedsmmachannel8970 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Bro the doctor was doing everything in his power to not stop the fight. He blatantly was putting his fingers up by not covering his other eye, stop with the conspiracy

    • @donscrilla7171
      @donscrilla7171 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@keion_arknights Yeah the ufc doesn't mess around when it comes to bad cuts, especially around the eyes. Irene aldana at the sphere is a great example

    • @tomsoyer5639
      @tomsoyer5639 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes it doesnt add up BSD was done dirty, he should have lost both his eyes.

  • @keion_arknights
    @keion_arknights หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Monarchies are usually beholden to keeping countries at their best because they have children who will inherit any strife, discordance, and any societal problems they leave in the country. Plus monarchs had very limited power over the life of the average person. Obviously you can't consider this a paradise or anything but it was the solution at the time.
    The problem with democracy is that the incentive is to earn votes win over all, and politicians don't have that same incentive for the betterment of nation, they instead do whatever they can to stay in power ie, control votes, and then you're back at oligarchy again. The reason western democratic nations love importing migrants is because they know they're people dependent on the government for welfare and their livelihood, so they get free votes, and this applies to any groups. Those common voting block phrases you hear, "the latino vote" and such, are oligarchs using diversity to control people.

    • @Apex0489
      @Apex0489 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In monarchy there is accountability. There is none in democracy. You can't have a dishonest media system that intentionally misleads the people and expect the people to make informed decisions.

    • @CriticalEyeMMA
      @CriticalEyeMMA หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I made a fairly detailed breakdown of the implications of the post fight speech with reference to Hermann Hoppe's book. Feel free to take a gander

    • @keion_arknights
      @keion_arknights หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CriticalEyeMMA Excellent video man.