It's recommended to save at least 20% of your income in a 401k. You can use online calculators to estimate how much you should save based on your age and income. Saving at least 20% of your income in a 401(k) can help ensure that you have enough money to retire comfortably. By saving this much, you can take advantage of compound interest and potentially grow your retirement savings over time.
Effective personal finance management is more important than the amount of money saved, regardless of whether income is earned through a job or investment. Individuals can seek counsel from a certified financial advisor to optimize financial outcomes, who can provide specialized advice and methods to decrease expenses and maximize income.
@@TerrencesSheldons I agree, that's the more reason I prefer my day-to-day investment decisions being guided by an advisor, seeing that their entire skillset is built around going long and short at the same time both employing risk for its asymmetrical upside and laying off risk as a hedge against the inevitable downward turns, coupled with the exclusive information/analysis they have, it's near impossible to not out-perform, been using my advisor for over 2years+ and I've netted over 2.8million.
@@JoeWilmoth-k2w I appreciate the implementation of ideas and strategies that result in unmeasurable progress. Being heavily liquid, I'd rather not reinvent the wheel, thus the search for a reputable advisor, Do you mind sharing info about this person guiding you, please?
@@KacieLehman Finding financial advisors like MARGARET MOLLI ALVEY who can assist you shape your portfolio would be a very creative option. There will be difficult times ahead, and prudent personal money management will be essential to navigating them.
@@JoeWilmoth-k2w I greatly appreciate it. I'm fortunate to have come upon your message because investing greatly fascinates me. I'll look MARGARET MOLLI ALVEY up and send her a message. You've truly motivated me. God's blessings on you.
One of my biggest concerns along with security and control is the current thrust by the US with protectionism. Big players in older industries will try and make legislation to mutate Ai in industries outside thier own. I also fear the current bent of industrialist will not embrace the point of technologies, namely to free humans from drudgery. With Ai coming in hot companies I fear will be looking to dump human resources misunderstanding retraining is the cheaper better option to dump and hire. As companies that do this will not be able to translate learnings to management and a staff expertise to management knowledge gap will appear even sharper exposing mistakes that cannot be learned from.
The government does NOT need to spend more money on job training. All these economists love to be prescriptive but don't think about waste. First, AI is still new and it's not clear who/how to train workers yet. Otherwise you've wasted people's time and taxpayer money. Second, if there is a clear benefit, the companies will absolutely train their employees.
That was an Excellent Interview Miss Kelly Evans. The best I've listened to from CNBC in a long time. Ian's interview with Roberta Metsola was really good ... but that's because Madam EU Commission President was really good on air ... less because of Ian. You were better from The Host side for certain. Bravo Miss Kelly Evans! ... 👏👏👏
Stop blaming something inanimate like AI for your problems! Save your money instead of buying your phones with every bell and whistle you don’t need! Stop buying your gambling tickets! Keep only one credit card! Buy a toned down car not one with every bell and whistle! Stop buying stupid stuff and save!
The whole upper echelon of individiuals focusing on a chatbot technology instead of people's relation & bettering of actual business is peak modern capitalism 💀💀
@phosphatepod The Nobel Committee is joke. The fish bowl is an analogy for the liberal collegiate cesspool of recipients who ignore the administrative costs of an oversized government that manipulates economic data to support their policies. He knows we're in a recession yet continues to support the administration that put us there. Clearly, his path is that of the military industrial complex and the manufactured belief that war is profitable. He is a Keynesian nightmare and fortunately he will have no position in determining the near future of this country. The only future he's interested in for developing economies is the standard debt trap. Delivering lies to the third world in support of his WEF overlords.
Well, why do you think he’s so popular in the field? He has had the highest impact in the field over the last ten years. Of course his research applies to flourishing of nations.
I'm actually impressed by his image quality; it is clearer than hers, despite being in a professional studio.
Probably using a Mac or iPad (even better).
It's recommended to save at least 20% of your income in a 401k. You can use online calculators to estimate how much you should save based on your age and income. Saving at least 20% of your income in a 401(k) can help ensure that you have enough money to retire comfortably. By saving this much, you can take advantage of compound interest and potentially grow your retirement savings over time.
Effective personal finance management is more important than the amount of money saved, regardless of whether income is earned through a job or investment. Individuals can seek counsel from a certified financial advisor to optimize financial outcomes, who can provide specialized advice and methods to decrease expenses and maximize income.
@@TerrencesSheldons I agree, that's the more reason I prefer my day-to-day investment decisions being guided by an advisor, seeing that their entire skillset is built around going long and short at the same time both employing risk for its asymmetrical upside and laying off risk as a hedge against the inevitable downward turns, coupled with the exclusive information/analysis they have, it's near impossible to not out-perform, been using my advisor for over 2years+ and I've netted over 2.8million.
@@JoeWilmoth-k2w I appreciate the implementation of ideas and strategies that result in unmeasurable progress. Being heavily liquid, I'd rather not reinvent the wheel, thus the search for a reputable advisor, Do you mind sharing info about this person guiding you, please?
@@KacieLehman Finding financial advisors like MARGARET MOLLI ALVEY who can assist you shape your portfolio would be a very creative option. There will be difficult times ahead, and prudent personal money management will be essential to navigating them.
@@JoeWilmoth-k2w I greatly appreciate it. I'm fortunate to have come upon your message because investing greatly fascinates me. I'll look MARGARET MOLLI ALVEY up and send her a message. You've truly motivated me. God's blessings on you.
clonemyvoice AI fixes this. "America unprepared for AI impact"
I’m assuming AI is so good that we don’t need lawyers anymore
And overpaid doctors
But all those claims that AI past the bar exam were proven false.
@@montyburnzFalse?…It passed with flying colors.
@@montyburnzit passed, but its tendency to hallucinate makes it impossible to use in law
Asking him how he’s going to spend his prize money was exceptionally stupid. This is CNBC not the View…embarrassing.
One of my biggest concerns along with security and control is the current thrust by the US with protectionism. Big players in older industries will try and make legislation to mutate Ai in industries outside thier own. I also fear the current bent of industrialist will not embrace the point of technologies, namely to free humans from drudgery. With Ai coming in hot companies I fear will be looking to dump human resources misunderstanding retraining is the cheaper better option to dump and hire. As companies that do this will not be able to translate learnings to management and a staff expertise to management knowledge gap will appear even sharper exposing mistakes that cannot be learned from.
The government does NOT need to spend more money on job training. All these economists love to be prescriptive but don't think about waste. First, AI is still new and it's not clear who/how to train workers yet. Otherwise you've wasted people's time and taxpayer money. Second, if there is a clear benefit, the companies will absolutely train their employees.
The Jobless Future of America : No One is Getting Hired
“The US needs all the stimulus it can get.”
Translation: We just need some free money to spend on some yachts, while selling out our nonprofit companies...
That was an Excellent Interview Miss Kelly Evans. The best I've listened to from CNBC in a long time. Ian's interview with Roberta Metsola was really good ... but that's because Madam EU Commission President was really good on air ... less because of Ian. You were better from The Host side for certain.
Bravo Miss Kelly Evans! ... 👏👏👏
My 👀 are still clearly focused on the ongoing depression.
what country is experiencing a depression right now?
Stop blaming something inanimate like AI for your problems! Save your money instead of buying your phones with every bell and whistle you don’t need! Stop buying your gambling tickets! Keep only one credit card! Buy a toned down car not one with every bell and whistle! Stop buying stupid stuff and save!
workers earn more ??? has this laureate checked price for groceries , electricity, property and public transport recently ?
😢AI is picking all the stock and What people it believes such live and some will be left by the road side 😢
AI needs toncome into the real world the robots aren't even out yet.
The whole upper echelon of individiuals focusing on a chatbot technology instead of people's relation & bettering of actual business is peak modern capitalism 💀💀
Globalization is not reversible. As technology advances, globalization advances.
Explaining this to trumpsters is a waste of your energy.
🤓💥🌎
Everything this doors h said just went out the window when his Harris support came out in the interview 😂
Well that explains the Nobel prize. It’s a reward for obedience.
Kelly is so good
😂🤣 Clearly, these award winning geniuses are drawn out of a fish bowl
How so? His research can be revolutionary if it's actually applied within developing economies. What part of it is "drawn out of a fish bowl"?
@phosphatepod
The Nobel Committee is joke. The fish bowl is an analogy for the liberal collegiate cesspool of recipients who ignore the administrative costs of an oversized government that manipulates economic data to support their policies.
He knows we're in a recession yet continues to support the administration that put us there. Clearly, his path is that of the military industrial complex and the manufactured belief that war is profitable.
He is a Keynesian nightmare and fortunately he will have no position in determining the near future of this country.
The only future he's interested in for developing economies is the standard debt trap. Delivering lies to the third world in support of his WEF overlords.
He should take the prize money and buy NVDA !!!!
🔥🔥🔥
He is an economist. He will probably waste his money on shot he does not need!
Does the Nobel in a soft ‘science’ like economics correlate to real things in the real world - besides popularity and prize money, that is?
Politics, his books explore the correlation between democracy and economics in different countries. Its a really interesting read.
His research is genuinely fascinating and can be revolutionary if applied within developing economies.
Well, why do you think he’s so popular in the field? He has had the highest impact in the field over the last ten years. Of course his research applies to flourishing of nations.