the way they speak to sound more intelligent and their inclination towards ooo philosopher is itself enough to determine their failure to comprehend the conversation. these afterthoughts are just trying 'forget what about what happened and keep following OOO'
These are not just after thoughts, these are the so called vainglorious 'intellectuals' with their extremely condescending and patronizing attitude, trying to advocate the discourse of OOO and their hero Graham harman, by calling one of the most important contemporary philosophers, Slavoj Zizek, and then putting him down. All opinions indirectly imply or say something like: "Zizek says A, but on the other hand Graham says B which makes so much more sense." Much of their interpretations are highly incorrect, misinformed and skewed with respect to Zizek's arguments. These architects and proponents of a very traditional cerebral and superficial notion of Formalism, with their craving for autonomy (in a pretentious artistic sense and not in a political or social sense) to architecture, are completely delusional. The video is very smartly edited such that it ends perfectly, where it seems like Zizek is giving up and handing the task over to Graham. This is not how a discourse is produced. This is pure strategic marketing move of a very smart institution like SciArc.
I had Jeff Kipnis as a studio professor, when I decided to challenge his ideas (if there are any) during class he completely flipped and called me full of shit, what a lame wanna be theorist who cant defend his ideas and will throw ad hominem slurs at students who don't absorb his claptrap
![ประสบการณ์ จ้าง Developer ที่ผมจะไม่มีวันลืม [ภาค1]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bzivN4KDg-k/mqdefault.jpg)
the way they speak to sound more intelligent and their inclination towards ooo philosopher is itself enough to determine their failure to comprehend the conversation. these afterthoughts are just trying 'forget what about what happened and keep following OOO'
These are not just after thoughts, these are the so called vainglorious 'intellectuals' with their extremely condescending and patronizing attitude, trying to advocate the discourse of OOO and their hero Graham harman, by calling one of the most important contemporary philosophers, Slavoj Zizek, and then putting him down.
All opinions indirectly imply or say something like: "Zizek says A, but on the other hand Graham says B which makes so much more sense." Much of their interpretations are highly incorrect, misinformed and skewed with respect to Zizek's arguments. These architects and proponents of a very traditional cerebral and superficial notion of Formalism, with their craving for autonomy (in a pretentious artistic sense and not in a political or social sense) to architecture, are completely delusional. The video is very smartly edited such that it ends perfectly, where it seems like Zizek is giving up and handing the task over to Graham. This is not how a discourse is produced. This is pure strategic marketing move of a very smart institution like SciArc.
I had Jeff Kipnis as a studio professor, when I decided to challenge his ideas (if there are any) during class he completely flipped and called me full of shit, what a lame wanna be theorist who cant defend his ideas and will throw ad hominem slurs at students who don't absorb his claptrap
Why do they all have rings on their fingers?
dialogue or a mutlilogue! That's how far I got
maybe nothing exists, not even for a moment, it is always becoming something else, things do, not are
I meant objects...did I say things? we can't have things
@@bradmodd7856 Bro reinvented Heraclitus
Things/Objects do ? Really ?
When looking at a flag waving, which moves first ? The wind or the flag ?
Talks about talks are somehow eerie 😨
Stop it 🧐
you have pineapples and mountain rangers hahahah
Pointless pretentious comments made by people who want to sound smart.