What i noticed and very appreciate the animators about the mw2. You can clearly see the hands gripping hard when shooting auto and adjusting when you stop. That small detail really makes me happy for some reason
@@duck_entertainment thats a universal problem in games with gloves and gloveless characters, quite literally nothing to be done to fix it. some skins have bare skin. they would rather the bare skin not be floating around the gun (that looks way worse) than the gloved hands go a little into the gun
@@spaceman-pe5je Idk I'm not a game dev but I imagine there may be a way doing some kind of "if operator gloved then apply animation gloved." Again idk much about coding or making games but I imagine this would be possible but a waste of resources
@@COLEink1511 For the beta, it turns it off by default for some reason, but there’s a setting that you can enable to properly render the walls and such, at minor cost too performance, and no, it will most certainly be changed by full release.
why even call it an M4 in MW2 2022 if its not even using an M4 upper and lower receiver? its just basically a heavily modified AR15. they should've named it as what it actually is. had the upper and lower receiver actually looked like the OG Colt M4 receivers then it could've been called an M4. pretty silly naming scheme. same goes with the Glock renaming that COD has been doing. why rename a Glock 21 into X16? just call it an X21 or whatever that it will at least resemble itself or make some sense. the X12 in MW2 is not a Glock 17 though, not a standard Glock 17 and not even the gen5 MOS variant. i don't know for sure what gun it is modeled after but the X12 looks more like the Glock 46 or one of the variants of the Sprigfield XD
My only gripe is the perk system... I'm more of run and gun but i don't use perks like ninja or others that make it easier to get around. . My perks are more for mobility and tactical and this new system doesn't have that... Unless they let you select them and still keep it this new way
The old operators in MW 2019 felt real and gritty, like they actually felt like they have been in war, the new operators feel cringy and more like cosplay or airsofters. the gameplay in MW2 feels amazing a d more tactical but i wish they would get the cosmetics right.
glad i'm not the only one that noticed. even the operator that has Krueger's voice actor still doesn't feel right or ig feel authentic to that kind of setting if that makes sense
I really hope you can remove certain HUD elements, i dont need to know exactly when xXBooty_Clapper69Xx killed someone with an M4 and itd be cool to be able to hide the kill feed
Thanks, Nick. I appreciate your firearm knowledge. I'm not a huge fan of cod but whoever designs the weapons pays close attention to detail and surely knows their stuff.
Man, I hate how military shooters are becoming less and less grounded. Between this, BF2042 and all those hero shooters there is an abundance of fictional elements such as fake gun manufacturers, fake countries, cartoonish "operators" and fake armies. I miss the days when these types of games would, at least aesthetically, try to emulate the real world. But I guess publishers are more interested in milking those microtransactions while paying as little for licenses as possible...
I'd argue this is more grounded than most COD games. The fake gun manufacturers has to do with licensing problems. The fake countries have ALWAYS been a part of the modern warfare series, even back in 2007 (COD4 had the US invade the "Middle east"... but they never say an actual country name) Fake armies were also always used. Most early 2000s video games had the US fight against "Russian Ultranationalists". They never had you actually fight RUSSIA. It was always some coup that you had to help shut down so the real Russians could take back control. Happened in Ghost Recon 1, Splinter Cell and Ghost Recon 2 with the North Koreans, Rainbow Six with Mexico, Battlefield 4 with China... same thing all the time. I agree that the cartoonish "operators" are a major problem though. I hate how multiplayer has turned into a weird operator vs operator super hero fight. But that's what's popular thanks to the MCU stuff.
@@enjoi9970 So was Battlefield 2142. It didn't rely on "heroes".. I agree with his point there. 2042's "setting" is so poorly realized and feels tailormade to sell action figures in the Target toy aisle.
I prefer almost everything from mw19 tbh. The character models, UI & font, player visibility and readability, gunplay (definitely still not perfect), time to kill (was still too fast in mw19 frequently), menus were better imo, MWII just feels like it was designed from the ground up to be battle royale/DMZ, which it was...
Especially the lack of enemy nameplates which greatly contributes to the pure dogshit enemy visibility can most likely be directly attributed to them trying to keep things consistent with the DMZ mode. Really a bummer and might be the sole reason I save 70€.
The new hitmarker sounds are terrible compared to the much nicer sounding MW 2019 ones. They ontop of that seem to be bugged and sometimes dont play at all... But at this point I wouldnt even be surprised if they did this intentionally as a "design" feature, like no enemy nametags, its laughable. Already cancelled my pre order, what a mess. Player ragdolls glytching out all the time too, like flying away after being shot like they were hit by a tank shell.
Gun animations and physics are awesome, you can feel how the bullet actually comes out right inside from your weapon pysich graphic direction. But the maps an operators not. Mw19 look 2 times better in that aspect, and its kinda disappointing becuse we are talking about a new engine. The maps should at least look 2 times better than mw19 when in reality its quite the opposite
I need to play mw2 some more but my initial impressions are - MW19 looks better. Maybe not on a technical level but art direction wise it feels better.. to me. The mw2 mps levels look so clean, compared to mw19 which are full of heavy detail clutter. Think this is very subjective, some would argue this makes gameplay better with less visual noise, which I can appreciate. But it certainly doesn't look as visually striking. Also the lighting feels a lot flatter in MW2, less contrast, more atmospherics washing out the overall look. The levels overall feel like they have less character and appear "cheaper".
I think what gives off vibes in MW2 is the fact that they changed things for the sake of it and that ends up not being as consistent as mw 2019, for example the ui, lighting, sound effects, models and some animations
Not a bad video but it would’ve been better if you waited until the final release came out because to compare and contrast a beta vs a 3 year old game is defeating the purpose of comparing and contrasting.
I like the wear and tear bit because I hated when the grime would conflict with the weapon camos which is why I only used gold and plat (Imo Damascus looks hideous)
Just remember we won’t be able to have a proper comparison until the game comes out due to the beta not having the option to download the high quality texture packs. I personally think the game looks amazing and plays really well the only thing that could of been different is to use newer models instead of being lazy and reusing models from the previous MW
For this one i kept it in its default setting for both games. I tried reference but it was much quieter overall. I'll look into using reference mode when i compare the final game
Environmental interactivity means absolutely nothing to me. I would much rather have enemies footsteps work correctly. They were too loud in multiplayer...but often non existent in ground war, which tells me we're going to have the same issues as last game.
That definitely is not standard issue and not m4a1. It is a mk18 mod 1 built upon ar15 platform like m4. Platform is only similarity they share between each other. In MW2 it looks like it is some ar15 idk which one but definitely from Daniel Defense.
looks like this isn't a fair comparison given the fact that a lot of the features aren't open to us yet but I think MWII does a lot of things better so far
another change you forgot was the addition of weapon Reload interruption. in MW 2019 if you fired your belt fed gun empty and started the long reload animation and if you switched to your other gun it would cancel the animation and you would have to start the entire animation over again if you switched back to the gun, in MW 2 if you switch your gun in the middle of a reload and switch back it will remember where the animation stopped and pick it back up where you left off. effectively making reloads a lot quicker and less punishing on the player when swapping guns.
It's not the same shotgun. Those are not model comparisons - just broad sound comparisons of similar weapons. The shotgun in MW19 is a pump-action while the other is a semi-auto.
You can not compare stuff from (incomplete)beta with production equivalents, even if it does look good. Kinda strange people do this. I do like the crispy graphics, but it does not have a feel of some new engine, I almost forgot that I was playing MW2. But sure, let's overhype this thing anyway. I am still going to play this since nothing better/new is out there.
Guns and gunsounds are better in mw2019. Especially pistols and smgs. I liked the realism in mw2019 and thankgod its not gone in mw2, only a little bit but still very realistic
I'm sure A LOT of little changes will be made. It seems as each of the games has its ups a downs... like the grenade seems better in MW2 but the C4 seemed better in MW19 ... LOL. The shot gun sound better in MW2 but then MP5 sounded better in MW19 ... And bricks looked better in MW19 but concrete looks better in MW2... so they both good their own ways!! MW2 looks fun though! Can't wait for launch!! I do believe it'll be the best COD we've had sense BO2(8+years).... MW19 was good but this will be a similar better version!
MW 2019, everything feels more distinguishable from each other in MW2 everything feels like a massive blur. Very difficult to spot enemy players in comparison. Colours, lighting, map design feels extremely cluttered on some maps and just empty in others.
that's the point, MW2022 is a step forward to a certain extent, but I felt the game was a little dead in comparison to the previous one, mainly because of the lighting and colors, from time to time I felt like I was on a CS map made by the community, even though it was beautiful it looked like something was missing
@@THEGuilhermeAB How is any of that a step forward or the point? Pretty much every comparions looks more bland on the MW2 side with a lower contrast and emptier environments.
Which is interesting because depending on who you ask, it's a different story. I personally think it's the least COD feeling COD we've ever gotten and that isn't necessarily a bad thing, I do really like it, it almost feels and looks more like Far Cry or Battlefield than COD, and plays like I'd imagine Insurgency would if it was more arcadey
@@MrZodiac011 Having a decent amount of time in Sandstorm it definitely seems the devs were fans and took some inspiration from it. Spot on with that comparison.
@@MrZodiac011 this is the way I described it to my friends. An Arcady insurgency is a perfect way to describe it. People are crying because they can’t fly around the map all Willy nilly without consequences. I like the more tactical approach.
one of the biggest differences i could tell but couldnt put my finger on was the wear and tear on the guns or lack there of in mw2022. Hit it right on the head with the guns feeling more sterile in 2022. Thats something i liked in mw2019
Most of MW19 looked better to me, from playing both, however this video shows MW2 looking better than it did for me despite also playing on PC at 4k Ultra. The character's arms and gloves, ground textures, walls, looked awful for me, like I was playing it at 1080p medium or something, just looked blurrier and less detailed.
I'm happy with everything about the game aside from the graphics, to me it looks worse than MW19 in most areas, playing both at 4k on a 3080. The sound design is insanely good, even better than MW19. The time to kill to me feels slower than the last few games, I find myself killing enemies slower, getting more hitmarkers, but it's still fast. I like the gun designs, they remind me of MW2 and 3, how they look believable but not necessarily how they would look in real life, unlike MW19 which was like COD4 where guns looked more true to real life.
Idk what it is, maybe it's the brighter colour palette or just art direction but the game looks considerably worse, with significantly worse visibility in most situations compared to mw19
yeah, it looks less gritty and realistic i guess, color grading is more vibrant, it kinda reminds me of bf2042 graphics in some way, but is way better of course
@@acoolrocket i think they made it this way for make it appealing to the mass and they scrap a potentially artistic direction, bc this game is developed with warzone 2.0 in mind, mw2019 was not as far i remember, or if it was they werent influenced by it because it was a new thing
Great comparison but the only thing I found odd was the ground war map comparison. That mexican border map is really dense with detail, and about 3 maps were featured in the beta
I haven’t watched the video fully yet but the smallest animation that had me go “wow, that’s cool” is when you switch from your primary to your sidearm and the character holds the primary/rifle still whilst holding the pistol if your aimed down sights, it’s such a cool little detail that other shooters don’t have to my knowledge anyway 😁
Cool detail except no one does it in real life, just letting go of your rifle and taking your sidearm takes around 1 second, no one keep his gun in the other hand.
@@melcorchancla9431 I understand what they were going for. I was trained to pull out my handgun with my dom hand while lowering my rifle with my non-dom hand. This game is kind of doing a "badass Hollywood" version of that.
@@melcorchancla9431 why would I play Call of Duty for realism, when there are games like HLL, Insurgency, Ready or Not just to name a few. Call of Duty, like others have said, are going for the Hollywood approach which is totally fine.
@@melcorchancla9431 yes it is done in real life tf, the gun is on a sling and it is faster to just let it down, and pull out your sidearm in the heat of the moment
It's a beta, they compressed the game down to 20gb, which is about 10% of what the full game is going to be, its impressive to me that the graphics are as good as they are in the beta
I think the reloading animations sounded better in MW19, but MW2 seems to definitely have better sounding firearms. Also I agree, explosives are lacking a little in comparison. I feel like there should be more metal on metal with the reload animations though even still, I feel it would really make them sound better.
I dont care what y’all say, characters and some stuff look more reallistic in MW 2019 than Mw 2 , characters , weapons and maps I hope they improve that for final result, cuz characters look plastic in mw2 , they looked very reallistic in mw 2019
after watching this video, I kinda feel like MW2022 is a step back overall; something about the colors, and the general gist of the game doesn’t feel real.. in MW2019, something about the guns was done really well to make it feel like the guns was a part of the environment, but in MW2022, it kinda feels like the guns aren’t really connected with everything else. MW2019 gives off a more crisper look. I think it has something to do with the gun reflections and lighting, the reflections in MW2019 are sharper and brighter which in turn makes it look more “significant”. The color tone of MW2022 gives off the same vibe as CW did, with all the weapons being slightly yellow for some reason. Something a lot of game devs get wrong nowadays is trying to make their games too vibrant; more saturation doesn’t really make a game look better, in fact, it can sometimes make a game look really cheap. I think the exposure of MW2022 just makes everything look slightly off. Anyways, thanks for making this vid, was waiting for it since the beta came out.
@@kyantemori I’m sorry but what? The MW2019 beta looked awesome! The only noticeable changes I saw was with the UI and the hitmarkers… a games general look can not be changed really within beta to full release, that’s asking for a bit too much.
@@sc1zzla that's because MW2019 was already top-notch. They can't go further than that, I'm okay with same level graphics as mw2019. Can you look MW2019 full vs beta graphics comparison please? You'll know what I'm talking about they were a huge difference. I'm respecting your opinions and in my opinion MW 2 is looking more realistic than 2019. The only thing I don't like is weapons are looking so clean. In 2019 they were dirty like real life.
I believe the difference in the were and tear was because this game is meant to be more special ops so the weapons aren’t being used on a front line so there not beaten and battered by your average grunts these ones revive a lot more care
The MW19 technically has a more realistic look because of the higher contrast lighting, but that hurt the gameplay because the darker shadows helped campers hide.
What i noticed and very appreciate the animators about the mw2. You can clearly see the hands gripping hard when shooting auto and adjusting when you stop. That small detail really makes me happy for some reason
Gripping so hard the gloves clip through a little bit
@@duck_entertainment thats a universal problem in games with gloves and gloveless characters, quite literally nothing to be done to fix it.
some skins have bare skin. they would rather the bare skin not be floating around the gun (that looks way worse) than the gloved hands go a little into the gun
@@spaceman-pe5je Yep it’s reality and it’s not worth fixing those tiny things but I still would like to see a quick fix
@@duck_entertainment there isn't a way to fix it. lol.
@@spaceman-pe5je Idk I'm not a game dev but I imagine there may be a way doing some kind of "if operator gloved then apply animation gloved." Again idk much about coding or making games but I imagine this would be possible but a waste of resources
The reason why some walls look worse and more flat in MW2 is because the tesselation option did not work in the beta.
I have gotten it to work, but you have to keep re-enabling it for some reason, very noticeable on the valderas museum map with big sandstone blocks
Yeah it also disabled itself every time you launched the game
Lol OK. It's going to look the same after release
@@COLEink1511 there's a setting you can turn on to make it look better slow one it's supposed to be default but it turns off
@@COLEink1511 For the beta, it turns it off by default for some reason, but there’s a setting that you can enable to properly render the walls and such, at minor cost too performance, and no, it will most certainly be changed by full release.
I think the footsteps are pretty accurate. Running around with boots and 40 lbs of gear shouldn’t be quiet and it isn’t in real life.
it isnt real life either thats the thing
X12 (2022) = Glock 17 MOS - 9x19
X16 (2019) = Glock 21 - 45. ACP
Kastov-74U (2022) = AKS-74UN - 5.45x39
AK-47 (2019) = AK-47 - 7.62x39
M4 (2022) = Custom AR-15 - 5.56 NATO
M4A1 (2019) = MK18 mod 1 - 5.56 NATO
The 2019 M4A1 is actually a slightly modified Daniel Defense MK18.
@@deebo3483
You're right. It could be a DDMK-18 with an 11.5 inch barrel.
The m4 in call of duty modern warfare 2 is a giessle urgi.
@@TaylorWilmes
Only the handguard. The upper and lower receivers are different from the M4A1.
why even call it an M4 in MW2 2022 if its not even using an M4 upper and lower receiver?
its just basically a heavily modified AR15. they should've named it as what it actually is.
had the upper and lower receiver actually looked like the OG Colt M4 receivers then it could've been called an M4.
pretty silly naming scheme.
same goes with the Glock renaming that COD has been doing.
why rename a Glock 21 into X16? just call it an X21 or whatever that it will at least resemble itself or make some sense.
the X12 in MW2 is not a Glock 17 though, not a standard Glock 17 and not even the gen5 MOS variant.
i don't know for sure what gun it is modeled after but the X12 looks more like the Glock 46 or one of the variants of the Sprigfield XD
My only gripe is the perk system... I'm more of run and gun but i don't use perks like ninja or others that make it easier to get around.
. My perks are more for mobility and tactical and this new system doesn't have that... Unless they let you select them and still keep it this new way
The old operators in MW 2019 felt real and gritty, like they actually felt like they have been in war, the new operators feel cringy and more like cosplay or airsofters. the gameplay in MW2 feels amazing a d more tactical but i wish they would get the cosmetics right.
the graphics/color palette specifically in general feels totally off too, but my lord the 'operators' are shite
glad i'm not the only one that noticed. even the operator that has Krueger's voice actor still doesn't feel right or ig feel authentic to that kind of setting if that makes sense
@@CommanderLongJohn it’s a beta
@@nikobellic8069 LOL if you think the game is going to be even slightly different than the beta you're beyond naive
@@CommanderLongJohn it will be? That’s what a beta is
Damn Vanguard and WWII lookin better than I last played [no longer in description] ;)
haha yup. Changed it ;)
Let's be honest, we were all waiting for this comparasion from this TH-camr.
Really excited to try this feature out! Amazing work !
Anyone else notice the dead guy flying across the whole room??? That's some pretty real ragdoll physics right there 🤣
I really hope you can remove certain HUD elements, i dont need to know exactly when xXBooty_Clapper69Xx killed someone with an M4 and itd be cool to be able to hide the kill feed
The HUD is so ugly. My tips, FOV 110, Turn the mini map to round, turn crosshair off, turn compass off. Makes it somewhat cleaner
Was waiting for this cod banger! Thanks nick
Will you do a direct comparison for Dead Space when it comes out?
This game need minor graphical improvements but for a beta a early beta it's insane.
The best quality comparison i've seen so far.
Thanks, Nick. I appreciate your firearm knowledge. I'm not a huge fan of cod but whoever designs the weapons pays close attention to detail and surely knows their stuff.
Man, I hate how military shooters are becoming less and less grounded. Between this, BF2042 and all those hero shooters there is an abundance of fictional elements such as fake gun manufacturers, fake countries, cartoonish "operators" and fake armies. I miss the days when these types of games would, at least aesthetically, try to emulate the real world.
But I guess publishers are more interested in milking those microtransactions while paying as little for licenses as possible...
I'd argue this is more grounded than most COD games. The fake gun manufacturers has to do with licensing problems. The fake countries have ALWAYS been a part of the modern warfare series, even back in 2007 (COD4 had the US invade the "Middle east"... but they never say an actual country name)
Fake armies were also always used. Most early 2000s video games had the US fight against "Russian Ultranationalists". They never had you actually fight RUSSIA. It was always some coup that you had to help shut down so the real Russians could take back control. Happened in Ghost Recon 1, Splinter Cell and Ghost Recon 2 with the North Koreans, Rainbow Six with Mexico, Battlefield 4 with China... same thing all the time.
I agree that the cartoonish "operators" are a major problem though. I hate how multiplayer has turned into a weird operator vs operator super hero fight. But that's what's popular thanks to the MCU stuff.
Well, 2042 is set in the future so..
@@enjoi9970 So was Battlefield 2142. It didn't rely on "heroes".. I agree with his point there. 2042's "setting" is so poorly realized and feels tailormade to sell action figures in the Target toy aisle.
@@Nick930 Battlefield 2042 was meant to be battle royale .
i was waiting for this
Every time he posts it feels like birthday!! 😁🤌
Just came across your channel, thank you for creating this content on Call of Duty comparison.
I prefer almost everything from mw19 tbh. The character models, UI & font, player visibility and readability, gunplay (definitely still not perfect), time to kill (was still too fast in mw19 frequently), menus were better imo, MWII just feels like it was designed from the ground up to be battle royale/DMZ, which it was...
Especially the lack of enemy nameplates which greatly contributes to the pure dogshit enemy visibility can most likely be directly attributed to them trying to keep things consistent with the DMZ mode. Really a bummer and might be the sole reason I save 70€.
@@Element_Finland they mentioned that will be added at launch in their feedback notes
@@RenK3r Thank you. 😲
The new hitmarker sounds are terrible compared to the much nicer sounding MW 2019 ones. They ontop of that seem to be bugged and sometimes dont play at all... But at this point I wouldnt even be surprised if they did this intentionally as a "design" feature, like no enemy nametags, its laughable. Already cancelled my pre order, what a mess. Player ragdolls glytching out all the time too, like flying away after being shot like they were hit by a tank shell.
I think Sledgehammer has something to do with that 🤣
@@Leon.S-RE4 lmao 🤣
Beta
@@wallclock4648 and plus it's hilarious to
The M4A1 in both games are different weapons
MW 2019's M4A1 is a Colt 933 that resembles that of the MK18 while MIIW's M4A1 is just a full auto AR-15
Are you able to do an update of Call of Duty’s history next?
Gun animations and physics are awesome, you can feel how the bullet actually comes out right inside from your weapon pysich graphic direction. But the maps an operators not. Mw19 look 2 times better in that aspect, and its kinda disappointing becuse we are talking about a new engine. The maps should at least look 2 times better than mw19 when in reality its quite the opposite
The Iraqi AK reload threw me for loop, lmao. I didn't play the beta so it was a bit of a shock.
Thanks! It would be great if you could control for lighting. Having that the same would really help us see the differences in texture work.
I need to play mw2 some more but my initial impressions are - MW19 looks better. Maybe not on a technical level but art direction wise it feels better.. to me. The mw2 mps levels look so clean, compared to mw19 which are full of heavy detail clutter. Think this is very subjective, some would argue this makes gameplay better with less visual noise, which I can appreciate. But it certainly doesn't look as visually striking. Also the lighting feels a lot flatter in MW2, less contrast, more atmospherics washing out the overall look. The levels overall feel like they have less character and appear "cheaper".
Mw19 is way ahead of its time. Mw2 went backwards.
4:39 HE CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH THIS
I think what gives off vibes in MW2 is the fact that they changed things for the sake of it and that ends up not being as consistent as mw 2019, for example the ui, lighting, sound effects, models and some animations
Stop complaining
Then if they didn't change things people would just be complaining its the same game lmao
@@terrywhitaker4393 Then why pay 70 dollars for garbage .
@@KurianKeralafromIndia I'll gladly pay $80 if they never take your adivce once lmfao
Not a bad video but it would’ve been better if you waited until the final release came out because to compare and contrast a beta vs a 3 year old game is defeating the purpose of comparing and contrasting.
I like the wear and tear bit because I hated when the grime would conflict with the weapon camos which is why I only used gold and plat (Imo Damascus looks hideous)
IMO Mw19 has the much better sound for weapons. The X12 sounds so wimpy. It suffers from Vangaurd syndrome where the weapons sound weak.
i cant explain it but mw2 looks real. when u were inspecting the guns. it looks like an actual video recorded irl
Always nick amazing job
Bring the wear and tear look back on guns and foot step noise fix and perfecto
What is changing is the increase of price and the logo
How did you get so many maps during beta? I got like 1 map.
I heard a guy's ground war was bugged and only got one of the maps, but never heard someone say they only got to play one map lol.
I like the look of MW19 weapon's better but prefer the feel of MW2's Weapon's more.
Just remember we won’t be able to have a proper comparison until the game comes out due to the beta not having the option to download the high quality texture packs. I personally think the game looks amazing and plays really well the only thing that could of been different is to use newer models instead of being lazy and reusing models from the previous MW
2014 is where they lost this customer.
15:30 ah yes, the infamous iraqi reload!
It's nice to see cod doing well again with this new entry but $70 to $80 for base game just isn't going to work for me
Great Video Man
Where the audio comparisons made with MW19 with Studio Reference mode?
For this one i kept it in its default setting for both games. I tried reference but it was much quieter overall. I'll look into using reference mode when i compare the final game
game looks great. High fidelity, quality work. You can hate on the CoD series, but they make a lot of money... and deliver a good product
8:45 *nick30 talking about lighting*
The getting laid out “are you serious bro?”
I bet a dollar that MWIII will straight out utilize Battlefield's Levolution destruction.
Environmental interactivity means absolutely nothing to me. I would much rather have enemies footsteps work correctly. They were too loud in multiplayer...but often non existent in ground war, which tells me we're going to have the same issues as last game.
cod slow warfare vs modern warfare 2019
i would love if they made the entire mw2 more competetive focused
Awesome video
That definitely is not standard issue and not m4a1. It is a mk18 mod 1 built upon ar15 platform like m4. Platform is only similarity they share between each other. In MW2 it looks like it is some ar15 idk which one but definitely from Daniel Defense.
They were lazy with mw2 sound design in mw you could hear the parts of the rifle moving when firing it feels like the gun carries actual weight.
looks like this isn't a fair comparison given the fact that a lot of the features aren't open to us yet but I think MWII does a lot of things better so far
Please do Bf 2042 vs. MWII!
This is going to be a great game.I like most of the changes,The do need to fix SBMM if they continue to use it,It is way off on the matchmaking.
Do I just mean that or have more weapons lost their license names?
17:46 helicopter helicopter 🎶🎶🚁
another change you forgot was the addition of weapon Reload interruption. in MW 2019 if you fired your belt fed gun empty and started the long reload animation and if you switched to your other gun it would cancel the animation and you would have to start the entire animation over again if you switched back to the gun, in MW 2 if you switch your gun in the middle of a reload and switch back it will remember where the animation stopped and pick it back up where you left off. effectively making reloads a lot quicker and less punishing on the player when swapping guns.
Modern warfare 2019 is better tbh. It’s like the issues in 2019 are more amplified in mw2 like camping for an example
4:30 EDP
I loved the kick from the shotgun in mw19. Made it so satisfying to use. To bad they reduced it in mw22.
It's not the same shotgun. Those are not model comparisons - just broad sound comparisons of similar weapons. The shotgun in MW19 is a pump-action while the other is a semi-auto.
@@Nick930 i hope they bring back the spaz 12 as a pump action
@@Nick930 oh shit you're right.
@@huntezslayer389 I feel like I saw that the Spas-12 was confirmed.
@@Nick930 noice. i just hope its pump action like back in the good old days.
Both games look good modern warfare 2 has some improvements and some downgrades. But it’s a beta that will have improvements.
Guns look more detailed in MW2019.
MW 2022 guns looks bland. I guess it's easier to make skins this way.
It would be sick if you can’t just hold the button down on guns!
Hello Nick how are you?
MW2 is fucking loud at base, gunshots, footsteps
You can not compare stuff from (incomplete)beta with production equivalents, even if it does look good. Kinda strange people do this. I do like the crispy graphics, but it does not have a feel of some new engine, I almost forgot that I was playing MW2. But sure, let's overhype this thing anyway. I am still going to play this since nothing better/new is out there.
Sure I can. I just did.
4:27 EDP445
Guns and gunsounds are better in mw2019.
Especially pistols and smgs.
I liked the realism in mw2019 and thankgod its not gone in mw2, only a little bit but still very realistic
I'm sure A LOT of little changes will be made. It seems as each of the games has its ups a downs...
like the grenade seems better in MW2 but the C4 seemed better in MW19 ... LOL.
The shot gun sound better in MW2 but then MP5 sounded better in MW19 ...
And bricks looked better in MW19 but concrete looks better in MW2... so they both good their own ways!!
MW2 looks fun though! Can't wait for launch!! I do believe it'll be the best COD we've had sense BO2(8+years).... MW19 was good but this will be a similar better version!
The water in this game looks sooooo clean. Like finally some decent looking water compared to warzone
x16: glock 19x
x12: glock 17 gen 2-4 cant tell
Was definitely waiting for this. You still have some of the best comparisons in youtube.
Same and true
Kermit is the G
Nick 930 & Digital Foundary are two Video game graphics channel must haves
*The *BEST comparisons.*
The three comparison channels I always use are NX Gamer, Nick, and Digital foundry. That way I get lots of coverage
MW 2019, everything feels more distinguishable from each other in MW2 everything feels like a massive blur. Very difficult to spot enemy players in comparison. Colours, lighting, map design feels extremely cluttered on some maps and just empty in others.
that's the point, MW2022 is a step forward to a certain extent, but I felt the game was a little dead in comparison to the previous one, mainly because of the lighting and colors, from time to time I felt like I was on a CS map made by the community, even though it was beautiful it looked like something was missing
@@THEGuilhermeAB How is any of that a step forward or the point? Pretty much every comparions looks more bland on the MW2 side with a lower contrast and emptier environments.
@@THEGuilhermeAB MW22 is one step forward and also 3 steps backwards. Comparing both at launch MW19 is sadly better.
There’s something wrong with the lighting in MW2, or something. MW2019 is much more crisp and detailed.
most likely anti aliasing being a forced option making the game blurry
swear 2019 looks better especially since it was a last gen game compared to mw2.
its just a beta so its probably going to be fixed
@@hassan8718 that has nothing to do with it
Tesselation option did not work in beta. I affirm you that mw2 will look wayy more smooth and crisp in full release when tesselation works.
MW2019 was so ahead of the time that there wasn't too much to majorly improve upon, visually speaking.
MW19>MW22
everything else needed improving on tho 😭
MW2 seems to be going back to the older COD games while maintaining it with the first game
Which is interesting because depending on who you ask, it's a different story. I personally think it's the least COD feeling COD we've ever gotten and that isn't necessarily a bad thing, I do really like it, it almost feels and looks more like Far Cry or Battlefield than COD, and plays like I'd imagine Insurgency would if it was more arcadey
No way
@@MrZodiac011 Having a decent amount of time in Sandstorm it definitely seems the devs were fans and took some inspiration from it. Spot on with that comparison.
@@MrZodiac011 this is the way I described it to my friends. An Arcady insurgency is a perfect way to describe it. People are crying because they can’t fly around the map all Willy nilly without consequences. I like the more tactical approach.
I agree.
there's no doubt the animators at IW are some of the best in the industry, maybe even the best for fps games
play escape from tarkov ;-)
@@sunnyschramm9650 yeah mw19 and mw2 animations shit on tarkov 💀
They have the bigger budget tho, cod is the best selling fps now, its not just about talent
@@sunnyschramm9650 tarkov animations aren't bad but looks cheap
@@nomey07 its for realism thats why its simple and not as exaggerated as mw2019/22
one of the biggest differences i could tell but couldnt put my finger on was the wear and tear on the guns or lack there of in mw2022. Hit it right on the head with the guns feeling more sterile in 2022. Thats something i liked in mw2019
The scratches and stuff on the AK47 in mw2019, imo, was too exaggerated.
@@mando2657 no, they were perfect
@@mountaindew3201 no they weren't lmao
@CVI2 fair
The character models look more real in the faces in mw19
maybe its the lighting position?
like in MP in game its looks better than Mw19
Yea i think Mw2019 had better characters lookin, than Mw2. Thats weird?
Fr, even in the menus,MW19s characters looked much better
Most of MW19 looked better to me, from playing both, however this video shows MW2 looking better than it did for me despite also playing on PC at 4k Ultra. The character's arms and gloves, ground textures, walls, looked awful for me, like I was playing it at 1080p medium or something, just looked blurrier and less detailed.
@@ChandranPrema123 its not that
I'm happy with everything about the game aside from the graphics, to me it looks worse than MW19 in most areas, playing both at 4k on a 3080. The sound design is insanely good, even better than MW19. The time to kill to me feels slower than the last few games, I find myself killing enemies slower, getting more hitmarkers, but it's still fast. I like the gun designs, they remind me of MW2 and 3, how they look believable but not necessarily how they would look in real life, unlike MW19 which was like COD4 where guns looked more true to real life.
ttk is fast wym
Saturation = Graphics. Nice.
The graphics in MW2 is a lot better. You just gotta wait for the release.
Am I the only one who thinks this looks kinda worse than MW2019?
Idk what it is, maybe it's the brighter colour palette or just art direction but the game looks considerably worse, with significantly worse visibility in most situations compared to mw19
yeah, it looks less gritty and realistic i guess, color grading is more vibrant, it kinda reminds me of bf2042 graphics in some way, but is way better of course
Same, its definitely the lighting/art direction that makes some of the MW:19 maps look better, but hopefully we get a surprise with the full release.
@@acoolrocket i think they made it this way for make it appealing to the mass and they scrap a potentially artistic direction, bc this game is developed with warzone 2.0 in mind, mw2019 was not as far i remember, or if it was they werent influenced by it because it was a new thing
Great comparison but the only thing I found odd was the ground war map comparison. That mexican border map is really dense with detail, and about 3 maps were featured in the beta
I haven’t watched the video fully yet but the smallest animation that had me go “wow, that’s cool” is when you switch from your primary to your sidearm and the character holds the primary/rifle still whilst holding the pistol if your aimed down sights, it’s such a cool little detail that other shooters don’t have to my knowledge anyway 😁
Cool detail except no one does it in real life, just letting go of your rifle and taking your sidearm takes around 1 second, no one keep his gun in the other hand.
@@melcorchancla9431 I understand what they were going for. I was trained to pull out my handgun with my dom hand while lowering my rifle with my non-dom hand. This game is kind of doing a "badass Hollywood" version of that.
@@melcorchancla9431 most important part of gun ownership is looking cool so idk what you're talking about
@@melcorchancla9431 why would I play Call of Duty for realism, when there are games like HLL, Insurgency, Ready or Not just to name a few. Call of Duty, like others have said, are going for the Hollywood approach which is totally fine.
@@melcorchancla9431 yes it is done in real life tf, the gun is on a sling and it is faster to just let it down, and pull out your sidearm in the heat of the moment
Mw 2019’s realism is still unmatched. Just look at the character models, price in mw2 looks like a sims character
Bro saw a operator SKIN and thought it was indicative of the game as a whole
@@cod3368 that’s why I don’t get why everyone is mad about the skins wit the ghost masks. I’m pretty sure those skins are only pre order bonuses
@@cod3368 "muh realism 😢😢" MW19 really brought the worst fans to COD
@@cod3368 because mw2 was supposed to push what mw 2019 brought but it didn't?
It's a beta, they compressed the game down to 20gb, which is about 10% of what the full game is going to be, its impressive to me that the graphics are as good as they are in the beta
The sounds in MW2 are good but the explosions in mw19 legitimately scared the shit out of me cause they were so loud. I didn’t feel that in MW2
right, especially when a Vitol explodes
I think the reloading animations sounded better in MW19, but MW2 seems to definitely have better sounding firearms. Also I agree, explosives are lacking a little in comparison. I feel like there should be more metal on metal with the reload animations though even still, I feel it would really make them sound better.
In dmz theres a explosion by people using sam sites for a challenge it kinda gave me the same felling as mw 19 and sometimes better
Everyone will of course always prefer MW19 because it’s well made
Let's take a moment to appreciate how much time and effort he puts into his content for us. Love the videos!
I dont care what y’all say, characters and some stuff look more reallistic in MW 2019 than Mw 2 , characters , weapons and maps
I hope they improve that for final result, cuz characters look plastic in mw2 , they looked very reallistic in mw 2019
IMO MW19 was a more realistic game and the engine feels better than MW2. Good vid
I really enjoyed my time with the beta but i'm undecided if i will get it at launch, if it's received well i might bite.
MW 2 is so washed out in color
Mw1 will always be better
after watching this video, I kinda feel like MW2022 is a step back overall; something about the colors, and the general gist of the game doesn’t feel real.. in MW2019, something about the guns was done really well to make it feel like the guns was a part of the environment, but in MW2022, it kinda feels like the guns aren’t really connected with everything else.
MW2019 gives off a more crisper look. I think it has something to do with the gun reflections and lighting, the reflections in MW2019 are sharper and brighter which in turn makes it look more “significant”. The color tone of MW2022 gives off the same vibe as CW did, with all the weapons being slightly yellow for some reason. Something a lot of game devs get wrong nowadays is trying to make their games too vibrant; more saturation doesn’t really make a game look better, in fact, it can sometimes make a game look really cheap. I think the exposure of MW2022 just makes everything look slightly off. Anyways, thanks for making this vid, was waiting for it since the beta came out.
Something about the lighting just looks washed out. It's like 2019 but more colorful, then with a slight gray filter placed over it.
It's beta graphics it will be better when full game comes out and if you look MW19's beta graphics they were not great-looking either.
@@kyantemori I’m sorry but what? The MW2019 beta looked awesome! The only noticeable changes I saw was with the UI and the hitmarkers… a games general look can not be changed really within beta to full release, that’s asking for a bit too much.
@@sc1zzla that's because MW2019 was already top-notch. They can't go further than that, I'm okay with same level graphics as mw2019. Can you look MW2019 full vs beta graphics comparison please? You'll know what I'm talking about they were a huge difference. I'm respecting your opinions and in my opinion MW 2 is looking more realistic than 2019. The only thing I don't like is weapons are looking so clean. In 2019 they were dirty like real life.
@@sc1zzla Look up rtx modern warfare 2019 beta it looks ten million times better im sorry to say
Some people might not like the Hotel or museum maps but if these are in some campaign missions the hotel one especially is going to be 🔥🔥
really happy to see improvement from mw2019, and really happy to see mw2019 still looks so fricking gorgeous
I believe the difference in the were and tear was because this game is meant to be more special ops so the weapons aren’t being used on a front line so there not beaten and battered by your average grunts these ones revive a lot more care
I don’t like the color on MW2 makes it look unrealistic
The MW19 technically has a more realistic look because of the higher contrast lighting, but that hurt the gameplay because the darker shadows helped campers hide.
@@kevinsteelflex7371 I’m sure there is a solution to this!
@@kevinsteelflex7371 get good, campers always find a way, adapt