No matter what anyone says his acting was extremely good... but I still wish Shahids character was also as glorified as his along with Jim Sarbh as Malik kafur
everyone must understand that there must be peace, peace and friendship. So this must understand that it is not in a movie to do something. and we learn something and we don't want to force you don't want to look for others
cuz he was my dude he destroyed Nadala library which was equivalent of Alexandria library of Egypt. Man massacred non-muslims, looting and implying Jiziya bhai I don't see anything good about him except that he was a strong leader of invading force of the middle east that's about it. Infact they show him here leading the army always and leading the army against mongols which is false his generals were great who won him majority of the territory. So if anything atleast they showed as an army general.
@Syed Ahmed See you tried to put words in my mouth I never said he only conquered Hindu kingdom. He conquered nawabs too its just turns out in that era most princely states were ruled by hindu kings. Yes conquering was norm back then fair enough. But trying to target communities that were not follower of islam by force or by imposing extra tax like jiziya or by destorying their knowledge sources like nalanda library, hindu temples that clearly points towards him being a bigot. Ofcourse you are not going to agree because majority of muslims especially Indian and Pakistani muslims never see fault in Islam spreading by force. Thats your reality. Very few follow true teaching of prophet Mohammed. Rest all believe in gazwa-e-hind. I mean they way you just swiftly say so what if he implied jiziya it was norm then well my dude it was only norm for islamic invaders. For example, Maratha's collected taxes to called chauth from all kingdoms but they didnt discriminate it to only muslims they could have but they didn't. Neither did they target only a particular community. I dont even know why I am even wasting my words but lastly. I don't have problem with muslim kings infact Isa Khan, Salauddin, Akbar, Hakim khan suri, Ibrahim gardi were some of great leaders. But bigots are bigots like khiliji, Aurangzeb etc. Its not my fault you endorse islam being spread by force.
@@statusking16880 yes how generals did defeat mongols definately but that doesn't change the massacres he did in India. Yes mongols were probably way more cruel but khiliji wasn't a saint either. I am not saying that from boll wood the padmavat movie was definately fictionalized. Khiliji and Ratan Singh never had a face off he was dead before khiliji sacked Chittor. So don't accuse me of beliving Bollywood movies everyone knows there are always get things fictionalized in there. I actually read sources and came to conclusion that he was a muslim bigot like aurangzeb.
Aurangzeb wasn't mad, he looked a very peaceful, simple guy who was often seen stitching muslim cap. Where Khilji was a very energetic, cruel. Aurangzeb was a very silent yet cruel guy, seeing his face none cud make out this guy cud be sol barbaric
everyone must understand that every person in the family has the right to see him a movie or two movies he likes don't put him action movies or nonsense not everyone has the right I will ban action movies with punches or pistols
what good stuff has he done? read Tarikh-i 'Ala by Amir Khusru if you want he has killed lacs of Hindus, destroyed 1000's of temples including Somnath.
@@mrityunjay1055 India wouldn't exist if it wasn't for allaudin khilji , he defended the India from the mongols ... Infact the only reason India existed and stayed rich (before the british came) were because of the mughals. If it weren't for them the mongols would've absolutely destroyed India and India wouldn't be India , would've probably ended up like the kurds (divided with no nation or actually ethnic identity)
Just becoz u are affiliated to his religion it doesnt mean u will support him whatsoever bad things he had done to this nation.Even I oppose many Hindu kings if they had done any bad deeds.Har chiz ko religion ke chasme se mat dekhiye
@@somestranger175 LMAO Alauddin is now the saviour of civilisation. read Tarikh-i 'Ala by Amir Khusru if you want he has killed lacs of Hindus, destroyed 1000's of temples including Somnath
@Aston Martin I dont know about Kashmir University But Nalanda University was destroyed by Baktiyar Khilji, who was a Military Commander of Qutub Ud Din Aibak and Iltutmish. He lived 100 years before Alauddin Khilji
Those who are telling khilji is a hero yes khilji is but on the other side he also had an cruel side which was shown in the movie cause this is the story of chhitorgadh and Rani Padmavati. Edit: Guyss I was just addressing the other comments calling him a hero 💀
It was not due to love of country that he fought them out ,it was out of his own intrest of power that he wanted to have over all of Hindustan. So check ur facts instead of going with the crowd like a parrot.
@@rahulkapoor3212 There was no country called Hindustan (as you know it in modern times) offcourse people looked after their own interests. Let me tell u if the Mongols got through Hindus and Muslims would both perish. Stop your hate of Muslims!
@@zero521 yo dude u better watch what u say! I have a ton of muslim friends , I don't hate anyone based on religion , I just hate bad people which include the guy who led to the killing of an entire settlement. And p.s u r the one who brought religion in this matter so , sometimes it's not the matter of religion. It's just that he was a bad person.
Lol clearly you don't have an idea of history. First of all khilji was an very evil guy when he won the Siege of Chittorgarh he massacred all the people living in and destroyed ever temple and talking about Mongol lol bruh khilji saved his empire that's it. Beacuse according to me Khilji was more curel then Mongol you should have looked background on who Khilji's are were they from and what belives they hold before saying something stupid after watching a random movie
Why do actors overemphasize their process? This is your job.. Being able to get in and out of a role is exactly why you are paid so much. I don't understand why this needs to be glorified so much. He is a great actor, I myself agree. But why so much talk around getting into that role and becoming dark and all.
Because of Heath Ledger. Indian actors know tat they’re just ENTERTAINERS and not actors, so to get attention they speak such high and mighty things about their below average roles.
Not all actors do method acting and it's really tough to do. It's not as easy as you make it sound. So obviously they are gonna talk about the process. Art is all about sharing the process and the product. Filmmakers talk about making of the film, songwriters talk about making of the song, writers talk about making of story, actors talk about making of character. It's not just job, it's art and it needs to be glorified. Don't talk like a child when you have no knowledge on acting or any other art form. Every job highlight their workings and process.
YALL NEED TO STOP PRAISING RANVEER! Let’s agree it’s the character that was intense AND ANY ACTOR WOULD ACED BEING KHILJI NOT JUST RANVEER I AM SURE IF SHAHID PLAYED THE ROLE HE WOULD HAVE KILLED IT SO PLEASE STOP OVER PRAISING RANVEER ITS KHILJI THAT MADE THE MOVIE AND HIS HISTORY ANY ACTOR PLAYING THE CHARACTER WOULD NAIL IT GIVEN HOW HISTORICAL KHILJI WAS!
RANVEER SINGH WAS THE BEST PICK EVER ! HIS CHARACTER WAS INTENSE AF AND WE THOUGHT HE COULDN'T DELIVER BUT THE MOVIE N TRAILER PROVED MOST OF THEM WRONG ! SHAHID COULDN'T EVEN NAIL THE RAJPUT KING ROLE ! HE WILL ALWAYS BE REMEMBERED FOR HIS ROLE And yes, Khilji was intense and manipulative and Ranveer delivered it w perfection and he deserves the praise he's getting !
@@davina1331 if you try more hard, even though you can't make them understand. Because they just know and agrees what they want to.. blind thoughts and beliefs to satisfy themselves 😀😀 Edit - actually I became a fan of Ranveer Singh after watching the film Padmavat. Before that I just ignored if anyone praise about Ranveer but now I got what he is .. Actually we must respect the people who have TALENT, ABILITY and SKILLS
No matter what anyone says his acting was extremely good... but I still wish Shahids character was also as glorified as his along with Jim Sarbh as Malik kafur
He is a legend...
True
Balls, he doesn't know the A of acting.
He is not a legend he is only a actor
@@dickensjoey8 kuch bhi
And Still humble
i see the photo of ranveer sir and and he ready in dress and makeup of aludin khilji and i can't belive this is ranveer sir!!
Nice one legend 🤗
everyone must understand that there must be peace, peace and friendship. So this must understand that it is not in a movie to do something. and we learn something and we don't want to force you don't want to look for others
Wow the way he speaks about Alauddin khilji is like he was a really bad guy.
cuz he was my dude he destroyed Nadala library which was equivalent of Alexandria library of Egypt. Man massacred non-muslims, looting and implying Jiziya bhai I don't see anything good about him except that he was a strong leader of invading force of the middle east that's about it. Infact they show him here leading the army always and leading the army against mongols which is false his generals were great who won him majority of the territory. So if anything atleast they showed as an army general.
@Syed Ahmed See you tried to put words in my mouth I never said he only conquered Hindu kingdom. He conquered nawabs too its just turns out in that era most princely states were ruled by hindu kings. Yes conquering was norm back then fair enough. But trying to target communities that were not follower of islam by force or by imposing extra tax like jiziya or by destorying their knowledge sources like nalanda library, hindu temples that clearly points towards him being a bigot. Ofcourse you are not going to agree because majority of muslims especially Indian and Pakistani muslims never see fault in Islam spreading by force. Thats your reality. Very few follow true teaching of prophet Mohammed. Rest all believe in gazwa-e-hind. I mean they way you just swiftly say so what if he implied jiziya it was norm then well my dude it was only norm for islamic invaders. For example, Maratha's collected taxes to called chauth from all kingdoms but they didnt discriminate it to only muslims they could have but they didn't. Neither did they target only a particular community. I dont even know why I am even wasting my words but lastly. I don't have problem with muslim kings infact Isa Khan, Salauddin, Akbar, Hakim khan suri, Ibrahim gardi were some of great leaders. But bigots are bigots like khiliji, Aurangzeb etc. Its not my fault you endorse islam being spread by force.
@@Angrypatriot_1 read the real history and then you will know but you are bollywood mirch masala people you will not consume the truth.
@@Angrypatriot_1 he defeated mongols and mongols cant defeat sub continent because of him i think you know how cruel mongols were.
@@statusking16880 yes how generals did defeat mongols definately but that doesn't change the massacres he did in India. Yes mongols were probably way more cruel but khiliji wasn't a saint either. I am not saying that from boll wood the padmavat movie was definately fictionalized. Khiliji and Ratan Singh never had a face off he was dead before khiliji sacked Chittor. So don't accuse me of beliving Bollywood movies everyone knows there are always get things fictionalized in there. I actually read sources and came to conclusion that he was a muslim bigot like aurangzeb.
I love alauddin after seeing padmavat❤
Really? I fear if you read Mien Kampf you will start loving Hitler. Or if you watch Narcos, you will start loving Pablo Escobar.
@@mrityunjay1055maybe he meant the character not the actual historic figure
@@mrityunjay1055 both of them are favourite human character to me. Doesn't matter how, but it's matter you reach high
Watching*
@@mrityunjay1055 or read the RSS manifesto and fall in love with modi....
Ranveer singh real life mein overacting karta hai
Films mein best acting karta hai.
Legend ❤️❤️❤️
1:26what seriously
Vicky kaushal as Aurangzeb in Takht hope he would do the same as Ranveer Singh as khilji
Aurangzeb wasn't mad, he looked a very peaceful, simple guy who was often seen stitching muslim cap. Where Khilji was a very energetic, cruel. Aurangzeb was a very silent yet cruel guy, seeing his face none cud make out this guy cud be sol barbaric
@@Kush_Bhatnagar yeah he was cruel but tactical
everyone must understand that every person in the family has the right to see him a movie or two movies he likes don't put him action movies or nonsense not everyone has the right I will ban action movies with punches or pistols
Fuck off
A.Khilji is a Hero.
yes true
@@exlncore7570 Yeah only for talibani jihadis 😂😂🤣🤣😆😆😆
He is the Modi,s guy...👌👌👌👌👌👌
Ok now listen allaudin khilji maybe a hero and done good stuff but at this story hi is negative
what good stuff has he done?
read Tarikh-i 'Ala by Amir Khusru if you want
he has killed lacs of Hindus, destroyed 1000's of temples including Somnath.
@@mrityunjay1055 India wouldn't exist if it wasn't for allaudin khilji , he defended the India from the mongols ... Infact the only reason India existed and stayed rich (before the british came) were because of the mughals. If it weren't for them the mongols would've absolutely destroyed India and India wouldn't be India , would've probably ended up like the kurds (divided with no nation or actually ethnic identity)
@@rayhaanshaikh6730 he defeated Mongols because of his thrown not for his people , he was a cruel devil 👿 so plz don't glorify any evil .
@@jaishreeramjaihanuman8947 What proof do you have that he defeated the mongols only for his throne and not for his people ?
@@rayhaanshaikh6730 so one monster saved india from another monster
this is real story of Alauddin ?? , why did they make a great man to evil ??
Great man, common buddy he killed his own uncle.
🤣🤣😂😂😂 Joke of the century award goes to Mr Rizwan 👏👏👏 😄😁😄
@@factsverse1037 who saved india from mongolia BUDDY?
@@Moha8med_8 In this sense Maurya also Saved Us from Sikandar
Just becoz u are affiliated to his religion it doesnt mean u will support him whatsoever bad things he had done to this nation.Even I oppose many Hindu kings if they had done any bad deeds.Har chiz ko religion ke chasme se mat dekhiye
75 kilo balls 👌
The truth tho about arsenal 🤣🤣
Alamuddin kilji is not evil character
Dude saved India from Mongols. Give him some respect, otherwise Indian civilization would have been destoyered like Persians and Khwarzeiman.
@@somestranger175 LMAO Alauddin is now the saviour of civilisation. read Tarikh-i 'Ala by Amir Khusru if you want
he has killed lacs of Hindus, destroyed 1000's of temples including Somnath
@Aston Martin I dont know about Kashmir University
But Nalanda University was destroyed by Baktiyar Khilji, who was a Military Commander of Qutub Ud Din Aibak and Iltutmish.
He lived 100 years before Alauddin Khilji
True
Enynone can make filme in any joner.
If we can make filme negative character of Shivaji, ashoka
We can make any one be cruel
True
Enynone can make filme in any joner.
If we can make filme negative character of Shivaji, ashoka
We can make any one be cruel
Sultan Aladdin ka character karna boht mushkil tha
Par character ko galat strike se dikhaya
Those who are telling khilji is a hero yes khilji is but on the other side he also had an cruel side which was shown in the movie cause this is the story of chhitorgadh and Rani Padmavati.
Edit: Guyss I was just addressing the other comments calling him a hero 💀
Lol are you okay? On what basis you are terming him hero? Read about his atrocities and mass murders of civilians.
Wrong information for this movie for alauddin khilji
Khilji defamed sadly! The man the legend that saved India from the Mongols.
It was not due to love of country that he fought them out ,it was out of his own intrest of power that he wanted to have over all of Hindustan. So check ur facts instead of going with the crowd like a parrot.
@@rahulkapoor3212 There was no country called Hindustan (as you know it in modern times) offcourse people looked after their own interests. Let me tell u if the Mongols got through Hindus and Muslims would both perish. Stop your hate of Muslims!
@@zero521 yo dude u better watch what u say! I have a ton of muslim friends , I don't hate anyone based on religion , I just hate bad people which include the guy who led to the killing of an entire settlement.
And p.s u r the one who brought religion in this matter so , sometimes it's not the matter of religion. It's just that he was a bad person.
Sakandgupta>>>>khilji philji
Lol clearly you don't have an idea of history. First of all khilji was an very evil guy when he won the Siege of Chittorgarh he massacred all the people living in and destroyed ever temple and talking about Mongol lol bruh khilji saved his empire that's it. Beacuse according to me Khilji was more curel then Mongol
you should have looked background on who Khilji's are were they from and what belives they hold before saying something stupid after watching a random movie
Dark n evil? Kya phuddo admii hee yar....Ghilzai is the one who introduced MSP for farmers and he was very handsome
Eating pasta
abe hindi mai bol
Kitna fektha hai ye
he is showing off a lot
Khilji ke khilaaf bagaawaat!!??
He's telling the truth only..
Talking about his experiences*
Yup, his acting seems very made up,
Bohat bada ehesaan Kiya India pee ....thank you...(chutiyaa,) 😏
Khilji ko mangolo se bachane ke liye thank you bol raha ha na 😂😂😂🤣
Why do actors overemphasize their process? This is your job.. Being able to get in and out of a role is exactly why you are paid so much. I don't understand why this needs to be glorified so much. He is a great actor, I myself agree. But why so much talk around getting into that role and becoming dark and all.
Because of Heath Ledger. Indian actors know tat they’re just ENTERTAINERS and not actors, so to get attention they speak such high and mighty things about their below average roles.
@@grumpybharatiya actors have been sharing their process before ledger. You just observed now.
Not all actors do method acting and it's really tough to do. It's not as easy as you make it sound. So obviously they are gonna talk about the process. Art is all about sharing the process and the product. Filmmakers talk about making of the film, songwriters talk about making of the song, writers talk about making of story, actors talk about making of character. It's not just job, it's art and it needs to be glorified. Don't talk like a child when you have no knowledge on acting or any other art form. Every job highlight their workings and process.
Jhoot ha kya.... 50 crore liye ha ranveer ne is role k liye
YALL NEED TO STOP PRAISING RANVEER! Let’s agree it’s the character that was intense AND ANY ACTOR WOULD ACED BEING KHILJI NOT JUST RANVEER I AM SURE IF SHAHID PLAYED THE ROLE HE WOULD HAVE KILLED IT SO PLEASE STOP OVER PRAISING RANVEER ITS KHILJI THAT MADE THE MOVIE AND HIS HISTORY ANY ACTOR PLAYING THE CHARACTER WOULD NAIL IT GIVEN HOW HISTORICAL KHILJI WAS!
RANVEER SINGH WAS THE BEST PICK EVER ! HIS CHARACTER WAS INTENSE AF AND WE THOUGHT HE COULDN'T DELIVER BUT THE MOVIE N TRAILER PROVED MOST OF THEM WRONG !
SHAHID COULDN'T EVEN NAIL THE RAJPUT KING ROLE !
HE WILL ALWAYS BE REMEMBERED FOR HIS ROLE
And yes, Khilji was intense and manipulative and Ranveer delivered it w perfection and he deserves the praise he's getting !
@@davina1331 if you try more hard, even though you can't make them understand. Because they just know and agrees what they want to.. blind thoughts and beliefs to satisfy themselves 😀😀
Edit - actually I became a fan of Ranveer Singh after watching the film Padmavat. Before that I just ignored if anyone praise about Ranveer but now I got what he is .. Actually we must respect the people who have TALENT, ABILITY and SKILLS
Most of us (Indians) have a pretty shitty taste, lol Ranveer's acting was terrible.
Allaudin khilij real haro