Published scientist here. Yeah, if you email the author(s) of the paywalled publication, 99% of them will have no problem sending you their publications for free. This is because the paywall is put up by the journal we publish our papers in, and we scientists don't see a cent of the money you would pay to read our publication. Plus, a lot of scientists are very ego driven, and would be extremely flattered if you contacted them directly asking to read their work for nearly any reason.
1:55 In principle, dolphins are not fish, they are mammals. This is because they have all of the base characteristics that define a mammal (breathes air, warm-blooded, internal pregnancy, feeds its calves milk from a teat etc). However, a funny detail in taxonomy is that every animal descended from an animal of a certain branch of the tree of life is technically classified as the same kind of animal that's at the base of that branch of the tree of life (this is simplified and probably not very well explained but I am an amateur who just likes knowing sciencey stuff). So because all mammals descend from that one fish that crawled out of the water and whose descendants developed lungs... technically, all mammals are fish. Including dolphins.
Again I have to point out that we don't actually know what came out of the water to form into our primal ancestors. People need to understand most stuff from that long ago is just unproven theories. Getting evidence for things that happened billions of years ago is not easy.
@@AIHumanEquality you're saying it like we still have no idea what happened, while we have a fossil records and taxonomic classification even for organisms living at that time
@@AIHumanEquality We actually have quite a few fossils of the first vertebrates to walk on land to the point that we know it was the Lobe-finned fish that led to land animals.
Especially refreshing when compared to Robin, whose presentation style seems like a coin flip between "I have zero clue what this means, I refuse to look up what it means, and will flaunt that in the ultimate inverse of being pedantic," and "I do know what this is about, and will proceed to rant about it until Mario builds enough speed for a 0.5x A press WFRR challenge," in both cases adding it to their Louvre's worth of things that make them angry. ...Just give me the funny, I have zero time for secondhand malcontentment. (or just give Robin better subreddits, he kinda gets the sucky ones a lot.)
16:30 If the truck and diver were travelling at a constant speed in a vacuum due to being part of the same inertial frame he'd dive into the pool. Air resistance, or if the truck is accelerating, would likely mean he'd, at best, bean himself on the diving board or indeed fall behind the truck.
1:50 the context is that, since all cordates are an offshoot of the "fish" family, we are all technically within that family still, including dolphins, AND including *humans*
"Fish" is meaningless in taxonomy. Lol. But the original vertebrates were "fish" and taxonomically you always belong to the same group as your ancestors
@@nebulan I mean we don't know what our ancient ancestors were before cave men. There's no way to know. We have theories but you can't get evidence for something that happened billions of years ago easily.
@prettypsychoqueen oh dear. There's no evidence if you choose to ignore the absolute mounds of fossil and genetic evidence. If you want to ignore them, I'm not going to be able to convince you.
Imagine being the Aliens in the Harry Turtledove story. You go to Earth, you think they’re primitive because they don’t have FTL tech, you mock them and then invade them. 8 minutes in and your whole fleet gets bombarded with missiles and nukes and most of your fleet is fucked and the ones that aren’t fucked are disabled from the damage.
And I'd like to defend humanity just on principle, but considering those aliens came with the express purpose of invading Earth, took the time to mock humanity's lack of FTL travel, and then didn't have the weapons to back up their invasion plan? Yeah, that alien main character should be horrified because they've just given the Earth FTL travel while also giving the impression that other world societies view Earth as easy pickings for invasion, domination, exploitation, and destruction. So, take a guess what humans will do.
@@mangaanimefan3089 to be fair, you’d definitely think a society without FTL travel would be less technologically advanced than you. You probably wouldn’t think they actually spend their resources on fucking war instead of FTL travel.
I told this story before but I once kind of corrected my professor in class. He didn't kick me out though as he noticed the mistake he made. This professor taught us the history of sociology and how to retrieve information. Basically how surveys work and how to make a good survey. All of this ties into my product and communication design degree. Anyways. This professor loved to engage us students by making polls in order for us to discuss the topics we'd study that day. And get most information on our own. One day we studied the aspect of marriage and religion. So he made a poll about polygamy. The questions were two if I'm not mistaken. Something along the lines of: Do you know what poligamy is? And is poligamy moral? Or something like that. I clicked on yes for the first one. And then I believe yes again for the second one. I raised my hand when he asked for who voted yes and why, and I told him I picked yes because it was the closest option to what I would've picked if it depends was an actual answer. Because poligamy isn't legal in many countries. But it is not only legal but moral in other countries. So it's a gray situation not a black and white one. He looked at me surprised and said: "You're totally right. I made a mistake in the poll and I should know better as I'm teaching you all of this." To be fair the professor really liked me and I liked him too because I loved the subject and I'd always add my two cents and answer whebever he asked for our opinions on things. It was the usual five people who always had an answer ready. And I was one of them.
Consider the following, from a layperson: Morality should govern laws, not the other way around, correct? (If not, why?) Therefore, in this example where your own morality is the only one that matters, why should laws change this? Essentially, isn't the intent of the question closer to "would you make polygamy legal or not?"
@@Teqnifii this happened last year so I don't remember how exactly was the question worded. But I personally don't consider it moral. But it is moral and encouraged for some people. I also stated it's illegal in some countries like mine (Italy) so even if it was moral you still couldn't do it. So whether it's moral or not doesn't matter as you wouldn't be able to act up on those morals. Almost like thinking it's immoral to steal. You can stick to your morals by doing the right think aka not steal. But if I thought stealing was moral, I wouldn't be able to stick to it as I wouldn't be able to get away with it. Ie steal and keep the results without getting in some kind of legal trouble.
@@nikitatavernitilitvynova Why would the legality of something affect your belief in its right/wrongness? I'm going to use an extreme example to prove my point - in Saudi Arabia, repressive and targeted laws, such as lack of discrimination protections, lack of marital rights and a ban on sexual activity effectively make being gay illegal. This does not however mean that I think that gay relationships are less moral in Saudi Arabia, than, for example, the US, which has no such issues - Morality informs laws, not the reverse.
17:45 the battery will get warm because you are short circuiting it, The nose ring should get warm too, but if you actually wanted to zap the person they'd need to be wearing two studs that aren't connected together so the current flow through the wearer.
Alkaline 9V blocks can supply a surprising amount of current when short circuited. When touching the nose ring, obviously there's no risk of being shocked, but the ring can heat up to temperatures capable of causing skin burns in under a second. So a person who this would be done to would probably jump up in pain as if they received a shock.
20:10 I believe the reason that humans can't quantum tunnel is actually that the circumstances required for a macroscopic object to do so (IE, all of its component particles doing so simultaneously) is just so absurdly unlikely that it can reasonably be expected that we will never observe it happening at any time in human history. I am no expert, however, so this explanation could be completely wrong.
Dolphins were my absolute favourite creature as a kid. I had countless dolphin toys and decorations and a dolphin lamp and dolphin bedsheets and a dolphin blanket and my dream was to swim with the dolphins. So naturally, when we were giving the option, I chose the dolphin to do my school project on, and eagerly began researching everything I could about dolphins..........everything! So anyway, dogs are my favourite creatures of all time how about you? Dolphins? No way, never liked them. Always thought there was something dodgy about them!
Dolphins are just scarily smart, we humans see ourselves in them and that's why we're appalled, I think :'D Because if you're smart, doing bad things can't be excused as "it doesn't know better". And in case dolphins are close to human-smart (and seriously, humans aren't that smart either most of the time xD) I would imagine their horrible/decent/good -ratio of individuals would probably resemble ours. Humans are great at making generalizations, I think this is the type of deal where you go to a new city and see either a parent buying their kid ice cream, a fratboy chugging beers with the guys, or a horrible person committing a crime, and then go back home and tell your family how everyone in that city is like that one individual you encountered.
20:58 i believe the assignment is trying to show an easier way to do simple addition. instead of solving 8+9, the student was supposed to say "oh, 8+2=10, and 9-2=7. 10+7=17" thus, the correct answer is 8+2+7
17:02 Wasn’t it originally intended that the humans in the Matrix were being used for processing power rather than energy, but that plot point got scrapped due to executive meddling?
13:05 The joke here is that all these questions require that he not understand anything about what he’s looking up. Like asking, “What country is England in?”
2:00 i heard it's because "fish" isn't a specific taxonomic term. The word "fish" applies to species so distantly related, that if *they're* considered fish, dolphins and whales might as well also be considered fish. Basically, if it looks like a fish, it may as well be one.
I'm adding my own two cents: Structural mechanics: Let's use math to see if an object can stand erected on it's own I did an exam on that and I'm glad I got a slightly higher mark than the lowest. I'm glad I passed even by a bare minimum. Both my brother, mother and her friend saw the exam test as the professor told us to keep the sheet I guess to solve it at home or to see the mistakes once the marks were published. None of them were able to understand anything. My brother barely understood a thing and he studied mechanics for a short while in highschool. My mom though her friend's brother (an engeneer I believe) might've been the only person she knows about who could've understood such gibberish. Probably not even my grandma if she was still alive could've solved it if translated. For reference she was Ukrainian and a health and safety engeneer. Edit: the professor gave us a sheet with three problems to solve where we had to calculate the constraint reactions (I'm not English so I used google for that. Not sure if it's correct though) and what would happen if any kind of force was applied to the structure. Like would it tip or slide or not move at all kind of stuff. Very hard to comprehend things.
20:59 I think what it might have been trying to say was "split apart one of the two numbers into two, where one part adds with the first number to 10, then add the other part," which I guess is intended to help speed up figuring out addition. The diagram supports that theory. The answer itself would basically go: 8 + 9 8 + 2 + 7
@@minaashido518 Rayquaza, _the grumpy noodle._ They're free to go as high over my head as they want because they are such a buzzkill when it comes to any fun.
2:30 That….is not a monocle, Jack. Max Planck wore glasses, those are just in the pince-nez style (i.e.there are no braces for the ears. The glasses are held in place by the nosepieces pinching the bridge of the nose and the string in there in case they fall).
20:00 I've always wondered how the flash manages to phase through walls without falling though the ground or not have the fluids in his body just phase through him
Maybe he makes the soles of his feet vibrate a little less so they stick in place inside the wall, allowing him to push off it to keep going. As for liquids, I have no idea, maybe he can vibrate them too, but it just seems like they would absorb the vibrations and so he would have no effect on them.
@@JonHexHead This is actually correct. He has to consciously make sure he doesnt phase through the floor. There was one episode (IDK which, I'm pretty sure it was in S5) where Flash loses control of his abilities and starts phasing uncontrollably. Often through walls, but also through the floor as well. A couple minutes later, the team get him to stand above one of the power-damping cells so when he falls through the floor, they can turn on the dampers and stop him from phasing until they figured out what happened.
10:10 - I confused my 1st grade teacher severly before. I taught myself on my own a way to solve math easily. I had the correct answers but I threw the teacher off because I was doing it in a highschool level way... Whoops. Wait, if a teacher did not understand that simple math, what are they hiring as teachers?
1:46 So this basically comes down to the idea that, when you think about it, there's no recognized scientific classification for what a "fish" is. Birds and mammals have classifications, but not fish. This is because sea life comes with a wide variety of different creatures, and most of them aren't even that closely related. For example, a salmon is more closely related to a camel than it is to a hagfish. So this opens up the idea that, since there is no one clearly defined idea of what a "fish" is, really anything that lives in the sea, like dolphins, can be described as a type of fish. It's like when you learn there are more than 3 states of matter, where something you thought was easily defined is actually a lot more complicated than you originally thought
It's in the same vein as "reptile". Because taxonomically bird descended from therapod dinosaurs, birds can be called reptiles, but that's absolutely not how we use the weird "reptile" lol
16:28 Under normal circumstances, you could jump up and down on a moving car and not fly back, however, that car appears to be moving really fast, so you would be slowed down by wind resistance if you tried to jump. Though it is fully possible to do the trick if the car was moving slower or you were sheltered from the wind. The car also has to maintain a constant speed. Any acceleration or deceleration and it will ruin your day.
I use the Anlian calendar. Every month is 4 weeks, but the month of Angel is split up so that each week of it covers a cross quarter day (Aug 1, Nov 1, Feb 1, and May 1). When the Anlian calendar shifts from the Gregorian calendar I insert or skip a week. I only have to do this around one year in every 4. The remaining months approximate the the Gregorian months very well except the week of the new month which is Angel, the previous month week 4, or the next month week 1. The seasons are labeled and the year starts with the August Angel week. The week that starts tomorrow is Season 2, Month 2, week 1, or the first week of December. It is Saturday December 2nd right now.
2:12 All animals that have a spine (I forgot what the English term was, we call them kičmenjaci in Serbocroatian) share a common ancestor. A common ancestor that was very likely an early form of fish. Which means that, technically, all amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals are fish
The 13 month calendar wouldn't work as well on leap years. And like, wouldn't leap years also offset the Monday start/Sunday end model and not reset for the following year?
I think one of the only college degrees you can get that will make you money is engineering. We always need more of those. None of the more fun ones are good for jobs unless you're gonna try to make it as self employed.
08:55 That is one of the main reasons why I, first year chem student, stopped watching Breaking Bad. Anyone with decent chemistry knowledge would use a base to dissolve a body.
Anyone else have a batshit crazy science teacher literally everyone loves? So, I wasn’t there for this, but this was told to me by said science teacher. So, there was some girl that went up to my science teacher and hit her. Straight up glocked her in front the whole class. “You can’t hit me cause teachers can’t hit their students.” She said. Well, the most reasonable thing would be to tell the school board right? Wrong. She waited. She waited until she saw this student in the mall with her mom and walked right up to her, and punched her. Then these mofos started laughing and this girls mom was so confused 💀
@1:55 There is no monophyletic group that includes tuna and sharks but excludes mammals. Monophyletic means a common ancestor and all its descendants - which you could call a "family" in the human sense, although "family" means something more specific in taxonomic sense. All tetrapods (e.g. frogs, crocodiles, humans, whales, dinosaurs and birds) are descendants of 'lobe-finned fish'. You are more closely related to tuna than tuna is to sharks. If you only use "fish" to refer to "ray-finned fish" then humans aren't fish, but then coelacanths and sharks would also not be fish.
I can explain the dolphins are a type of fish. It comes back to that you never out evolove through lineages, that is to say, a human will always be a great ape, no matter what forms we may take in the future. And going back far enough, humans, evolved from fish, meaning that we, in a sense are fish
Not all water dwellers are fish. That's a misconception by itself. Lots of non fish creatures dwell in the oceans. It's more likely we were some kind of bacteria or fungus than a fish that evolved into a land dweller.
@@AIHumanEquality r/confidentlyincorrect I'm sorry, but you are way off the mark with that one. The cellular structure of bacteria and fungi are far more different to those of members of the animal kingdom than fish cells are to human cells. DNA analysis will show you the closer evolutionary relationship, It has long since ben demonstrated that we have evolved from fish through DNA and anatomical markers. Source: Degree in biochemistry and molecular genetics.
2:02 Hello, Peter here! Basically, dolphins are, in principle, a type of mammal, since they descended from a mammalian ancestor, and since animals cannot outgrow their classifications, they are still considered mammals, despite looking nothing like one. However, since animals cannot outgrow their classification in taxonomy, means that dolphins are still a type of fish, more in specific, a lobe-finned fish, as their earliest ancestors, such as the Tiktaalik, were lobe-finned fish that crawled out of the water, and since you cannot outgrow your classification, means that EVERY animal that descended from that fish, from dolphins to humans to lizards to birds and frogs, are all a type of lobe-finned fish. This is also the same reason, why birds are classified as a type of dinosaur and a type of reptile, or also why insects are classified as a type of crustacean.
2:10 no! no... Seals are sea puppies 6:00 As my father's friend durring a roleplay campaign once had their crazy scientist character say: "We pump our air full of toxins to weed out the weak lunged! We detonate nuclear weapons in our *ONLY* biosphere, We Nailed our god TO A PEICE OF WOOD! *DO NOT FUCK WITH THE HUMAN RACE!*"
Dolphins at are cetaceans (with whales). Cetaceans are mammals. Mammals are tetrapods. Tetrapods are vertebrates. Vertebrates are animals. No organism ever outgrows their ancestry 😁
1:05 All you astrologers out there, please correct me if I'm wrong. Isn't the sun shrinking then growing the star turning into a red giant? And isn't that signs that it's going to, possibly, go nova or super nova?
Yes and no. the sun is not a big enough star to end in a supernova, but it *will* have a red giant phase. as the sun's core of hydrogen begins converting into heavier substances, it will simply shrink.
I'm just misremebering from a old youtube video but when the sun eventually dies, it will likely end up as a white dwarf holding about half of the mass of the sun as it is now. Which would be significantly colder but would still radiate light longer than the lifespan of every living star at this moment. Infact, white dwarfs lose heat so slowly that it's likely that the first black dwarf (white dwarf but approaching 0 kelvin) would likely be considered the beginning of the end in terms of the heat death of the universe.
1:30 this depends on the authors....but a lot of them are doing the science to spread knowledge so it is pretty normal for the authors to have no issue giving you a copy
16:29 in a vacuum thats an entirely different discussion. for one theyd both be dead🤣 17:38 ever touched a 9v battery to your own tongue? (yes itll shock you but not a lot)
That last post is very awkwardly phrased The jist is For some problems and some kids, it's easier to make other numbers out of those provided Think about 2 groups of pennies If I have 8 on one side and 9 on the other, it can feel a little awkward to add those numbers up in my head. I can do it, but it might be a little slow because I overthink it But if I take one penny from the 8 group and put it in the 9 group? Suddenly it's 7+10! That's easy, 17, I understand that immediately because 10 is an easy number to work with quickly! So the question should have said 'Working with tens can make addition easier! What's one way we can make a 10 out of 8 and 9, and what do you get when adding them together?' This prompts a closer look at the two, a likely realization that 2 removed from 9, or 1 removed from 8, will result in 10+7, which they can write down to show they understand, and then add that the answer is 17! It's a weird method for some questions, but giving tools of all sorts to find an answer, even if they all find the same answer, is important to finding what works best with each brain! A bit like blindly testing a screw with multiple screwdrivers to see which head works best to fit it and screw it in cleanly ^^ Some folks prefer finding a 5, 7, 2, 3, ect And bigger calcs might do better when looking for a way to make a 100 And this method of moving pennies around into tidier groups is great for those that work better with it! ^^
Half the time I adjust to something easier in base 10, and half the time I adjust to base 2. It's way easier for me to to math in binary than decimal in a lot of cases. I guess that's my love for computer science showing (mixed with me just liking to do things differently than most in general). Shifting perspectives is very helpful. (but I didn't understand what the goal of that post was in the first place anyway, so thank you for explaining it. It definitely could've been worded better, but I still feel like I should've understood it...)
19:59 unfortunately, it's all luck based and the chance of quantum tunneling decreases with the thickness of the wall, mass of the object and such. if you are lucky, you might get half of your cells through an atom thick wall. here's the equation to calculate it so I sound smart: P= e^(-2KL) where L is the width of the barrier and K is I don't even know don't ask pls
3:19 don't exactly get the brain and the balls on this one but i've heard that if your immune system "found about" your eyes it would probably eat them out.
2:06: it's because under the modern claid system of cladiastics, everything that evolves form one group is still that thing, so humans are still apes, and thus are still monkeys, and ever scence every vertebrate came from fish, all vertebrates are still fish (although anyone who actually knows what they are talking about also knows the term "fish" is redundant and has no real value evolutionary cladiastics)
@@AIHumanEquality and that's why they also kept the old lemarkian system around ( you know, genius, spieces, family, kingdom, ECT) and use it in conjunction with the new system and use it as a bench mark to help keep everything organized.
Whether the person at 16:33 would fall off depends on 1. If the vehicle is accelerating/deccelerating and 2. Air resistance. If the vehicle is accelerating enough or is fast enough that air resistance pushes the guy back then he will fall off, but if its going at constant speed ignoring the effects of air resistance then no, he will not
As a kid I rly thought those star signs actually looked like the cute animals and such, so I was massively disappointed when I learned they, in fact, were not.
1:52 because its long been theorized that we are all commonly descended from fish that evolved out of water. basically many (or all, idk) vertebrates descend from that ancestor so, it a technical sense, dolphins are a type of fish (that got out of water, evolved into a mammal and then went back in it) idk I could be wrong.
The irony of self-censoring sh*t as shmit when talking about circuitry, it immediately reminded me that Schmitt triggers exist to clean up electrical signals in circuits
18:40 I think the supergirl show did mention this, I think brainiac was mad no one appreciated him and was going on a rant on how hard Time travel is bc it’s also space travel and he has to calculate the movement of the earth too.
Published scientist here. Yeah, if you email the author(s) of the paywalled publication, 99% of them will have no problem sending you their publications for free. This is because the paywall is put up by the journal we publish our papers in, and we scientists don't see a cent of the money you would pay to read our publication. Plus, a lot of scientists are very ego driven, and would be extremely flattered if you contacted them directly asking to read their work for nearly any reason.
1:55 In principle, dolphins are not fish, they are mammals. This is because they have all of the base characteristics that define a mammal (breathes air, warm-blooded, internal pregnancy, feeds its calves milk from a teat etc).
However, a funny detail in taxonomy is that every animal descended from an animal of a certain branch of the tree of life is technically classified as the same kind of animal that's at the base of that branch of the tree of life (this is simplified and probably not very well explained but I am an amateur who just likes knowing sciencey stuff). So because all mammals descend from that one fish that crawled out of the water and whose descendants developed lungs... technically, all mammals are fish. Including dolphins.
Again I have to point out that we don't actually know what came out of the water to form into our primal ancestors. People need to understand most stuff from that long ago is just unproven theories. Getting evidence for things that happened billions of years ago is not easy.
We mammals are more closely related to tuna than great white shark is to tuna.
INCORRECT. All dolphins are swimming arsehole
@@AIHumanEquality you're saying it like we still have no idea what happened, while we have a fossil records and taxonomic classification even for organisms living at that time
@@AIHumanEquality We actually have quite a few fossils of the first vertebrates to walk on land to the point that we know it was the Lobe-finned fish that led to land animals.
I love this, and I love that Jack actually looks up the things he doesn't understand and shares them with the class. I need more.
Especially refreshing when compared to Robin, whose presentation style seems like a coin flip between "I have zero clue what this means, I refuse to look up what it means, and will flaunt that in the ultimate inverse of being pedantic," and "I do know what this is about, and will proceed to rant about it until Mario builds enough speed for a 0.5x A press WFRR challenge," in both cases adding it to their Louvre's worth of things that make them angry.
...Just give me the funny, I have zero time for secondhand malcontentment. (or just give Robin better subreddits, he kinda gets the sucky ones a lot.)
16:30 If the truck and diver were travelling at a constant speed in a vacuum due to being part of the same inertial frame he'd dive into the pool. Air resistance, or if the truck is accelerating, would likely mean he'd, at best, bean himself on the diving board or indeed fall behind the truck.
not too mention if the truck was accelerating then the water would not all be in the pool
Nah you‘re right, a lot of publishers give out the work if you ask them politely. The last one just asked me to see my paper when it’s done :)
1:50 the context is that, since all cordates are an offshoot of the "fish" family, we are all technically within that family still, including dolphins, AND including *humans*
Science do be crazy
Not exactly. Not all water dwellers were fish. It's more likely we were some sort of fungus or bacteria that grew into a land creature than a fish.
"Fish" is meaningless in taxonomy. Lol. But the original vertebrates were "fish" and taxonomically you always belong to the same group as your ancestors
@@nebulan I mean we don't know what our ancient ancestors were before cave men. There's no way to know. We have theories but you can't get evidence for something that happened billions of years ago easily.
@prettypsychoqueen oh dear. There's no evidence if you choose to ignore the absolute mounds of fossil and genetic evidence. If you want to ignore them, I'm not going to be able to convince you.
Imagine being the Aliens in the Harry Turtledove story. You go to Earth, you think they’re primitive because they don’t have FTL tech, you mock them and then invade them. 8 minutes in and your whole fleet gets bombarded with missiles and nukes and most of your fleet is fucked and the ones that aren’t fucked are disabled from the damage.
What book is that? I’m now interested
@@whereismycup idk
I guess it's 'The road not taken'. Just looked it up for myself
And I'd like to defend humanity just on principle, but considering those aliens came with the express purpose of invading Earth, took the time to mock humanity's lack of FTL travel, and then didn't have the weapons to back up their invasion plan? Yeah, that alien main character should be horrified because they've just given the Earth FTL travel while also giving the impression that other world societies view Earth as easy pickings for invasion, domination, exploitation, and destruction. So, take a guess what humans will do.
@@mangaanimefan3089 to be fair, you’d definitely think a society without FTL travel would be less technologically advanced than you. You probably wouldn’t think they actually spend their resources on fucking war instead of FTL travel.
1:40 you are correct. Email the author and they're very likely to just send you a PDF.
I told this story before but I once kind of corrected my professor in class. He didn't kick me out though as he noticed the mistake he made.
This professor taught us the history of sociology and how to retrieve information. Basically how surveys work and how to make a good survey. All of this ties into my product and communication design degree. Anyways. This professor loved to engage us students by making polls in order for us to discuss the topics we'd study that day. And get most information on our own. One day we studied the aspect of marriage and religion. So he made a poll about polygamy. The questions were two if I'm not mistaken. Something along the lines of: Do you know what poligamy is? And is poligamy moral? Or something like that.
I clicked on yes for the first one. And then I believe yes again for the second one. I raised my hand when he asked for who voted yes and why, and I told him I picked yes because it was the closest option to what I would've picked if it depends was an actual answer. Because poligamy isn't legal in many countries. But it is not only legal but moral in other countries. So it's a gray situation not a black and white one. He looked at me surprised and said: "You're totally right. I made a mistake in the poll and I should know better as I'm teaching you all of this."
To be fair the professor really liked me and I liked him too because I loved the subject and I'd always add my two cents and answer whebever he asked for our opinions on things. It was the usual five people who always had an answer ready. And I was one of them.
Consider the following, from a layperson: Morality should govern laws, not the other way around, correct? (If not, why?) Therefore, in this example where your own morality is the only one that matters, why should laws change this? Essentially, isn't the intent of the question closer to "would you make polygamy legal or not?"
@@Teqnifii this happened last year so I don't remember how exactly was the question worded. But I personally don't consider it moral. But it is moral and encouraged for some people. I also stated it's illegal in some countries like mine (Italy) so even if it was moral you still couldn't do it. So whether it's moral or not doesn't matter as you wouldn't be able to act up on those morals. Almost like thinking it's immoral to steal. You can stick to your morals by doing the right think aka not steal. But if I thought stealing was moral, I wouldn't be able to stick to it as I wouldn't be able to get away with it. Ie steal and keep the results without getting in some kind of legal trouble.
@@nikitatavernitilitvynova Why would the legality of something affect your belief in its right/wrongness? I'm going to use an extreme example to prove my point - in Saudi Arabia, repressive and targeted laws, such as lack of discrimination protections, lack of marital rights and a ban on sexual activity effectively make being gay illegal. This does not however mean that I think that gay relationships are less moral in Saudi Arabia, than, for example, the US, which has no such issues - Morality informs laws, not the reverse.
@@nikitatavernitilitvynova hey I know that its been a while but out of pure curiosity, why do you consider polygamy to be immoral?
S C I Y A N C E
Ai sea jou evryuere
@@palmossiDon't talk with food in your mouth.
@@AIHumanEquality sårri
S I G H I N S E
Nahh it’s just a formal game of fuck around and find out
17:45 the battery will get warm because you are short circuiting it, The nose ring should get warm too, but if you actually wanted to zap the person they'd need to be wearing two studs that aren't connected together so the current flow through the wearer.
I saw a video clip where someone did this and got the ever living hell shocked outta them
Alkaline 9V blocks can supply a surprising amount of current when short circuited. When touching the nose ring, obviously there's no risk of being shocked, but the ring can heat up to temperatures capable of causing skin burns in under a second. So a person who this would be done to would probably jump up in pain as if they received a shock.
@@ankhtahr1401 That's probably what happened. Still funny though
20:10 I believe the reason that humans can't quantum tunnel is actually that the circumstances required for a macroscopic object to do so (IE, all of its component particles doing so simultaneously) is just so absurdly unlikely that it can reasonably be expected that we will never observe it happening at any time in human history. I am no expert, however, so this explanation could be completely wrong.
Dolphins were my absolute favourite creature as a kid. I had countless dolphin toys and decorations and a dolphin lamp and dolphin bedsheets and a dolphin blanket and my dream was to swim with the dolphins. So naturally, when we were giving the option, I chose the dolphin to do my school project on, and eagerly began researching everything I could about dolphins..........everything!
So anyway, dogs are my favourite creatures of all time how about you?
Dolphins? No way, never liked them. Always thought there was something dodgy about them!
Dolphins are just scarily smart, we humans see ourselves in them and that's why we're appalled, I think :'D Because if you're smart, doing bad things can't be excused as "it doesn't know better". And in case dolphins are close to human-smart (and seriously, humans aren't that smart either most of the time xD) I would imagine their horrible/decent/good -ratio of individuals would probably resemble ours. Humans are great at making generalizations, I think this is the type of deal where you go to a new city and see either a parent buying their kid ice cream, a fratboy chugging beers with the guys, or a horrible person committing a crime, and then go back home and tell your family how everyone in that city is like that one individual you encountered.
20:58 i believe the assignment is trying to show an easier way to do simple addition. instead of solving 8+9, the student was supposed to say "oh, 8+2=10, and 9-2=7. 10+7=17" thus, the correct answer is 8+2+7
9:44 sounds like seals barking.
17:02 Wasn’t it originally intended that the humans in the Matrix were being used for processing power rather than energy, but that plot point got scrapped due to executive meddling?
11:40 we cant even get rid of the daylight saving time.. so i dont think we will ever change anything about our calendar
1:31 actually yes usually, as scientists and researches, regardless of the field usually love to make knowledge more accessible
13:05 The joke here is that all these questions require that he not understand anything about what he’s looking up. Like asking, “What country is England in?”
Just made the connection at 8:50 at why they'd always cover corpses with lye back in the day. The more you know
2:00 i heard it's because "fish" isn't a specific taxonomic term. The word "fish" applies to species so distantly related, that if *they're* considered fish, dolphins and whales might as well also be considered fish. Basically, if it looks like a fish, it may as well be one.
18:47 7 Days. That show is called 7 Days.
I'm adding my own two cents:
Structural mechanics: Let's use math to see if an object can stand erected on it's own
I did an exam on that and I'm glad I got a slightly higher mark than the lowest. I'm glad I passed even by a bare minimum. Both my brother, mother and her friend saw the exam test as the professor told us to keep the sheet I guess to solve it at home or to see the mistakes once the marks were published. None of them were able to understand anything. My brother barely understood a thing and he studied mechanics for a short while in highschool. My mom though her friend's brother (an engeneer I believe) might've been the only person she knows about who could've understood such gibberish. Probably not even my grandma if she was still alive could've solved it if translated. For reference she was Ukrainian and a health and safety engeneer.
Edit: the professor gave us a sheet with three problems to solve where we had to calculate the constraint reactions (I'm not English so I used google for that. Not sure if it's correct though) and what would happen if any kind of force was applied to the structure. Like would it tip or slide or not move at all kind of stuff. Very hard to comprehend things.
0:24
There were likely more stars back then so it would make sense that they'd see a goat. But they're extinct now, so all we got is a line.
6:40 HOW DARE YOU NOT KNOW THE EXACT VARIANT OF FREDDY THAT IS BURNING IN THE PHOTO, THAT IS MOLTEN FREDDY FROM FNAF 6! /s
20:59 I think what it might have been trying to say was "split apart one of the two numbers into two, where one part adds with the first number to 10, then add the other part," which I guess is intended to help speed up figuring out addition. The diagram supports that theory.
The answer itself would basically go:
8 + 9
8 + 2 + 7
7:37 As an engineering PhD, the idea of paying to get a PhD is funny.
Time to count how many of these go over my head. :b
Edit: Jack, you have too much fun with doing _excited_ moans like at 6:49
*Do continue.*
lol
Go over your head, but aren’t you a jet dragon how could they go higher
@@minaashido518By being space dragons.
@@AIHumanEquality ah, rayquaza
@@minaashido518 Rayquaza, _the grumpy noodle._ They're free to go as high over my head as they want because they are such a buzzkill when it comes to any fun.
9:15
Ultimate crossover.
Halloween
Logic
AND diagrams
2:30 That….is not a monocle, Jack. Max Planck wore glasses, those are just in the pince-nez style (i.e.there are no braces for the ears. The glasses are held in place by the nosepieces pinching the bridge of the nose and the string in there in case they fall).
20:00 I've always wondered how the flash manages to phase through walls without falling though the ground or not have the fluids in his body just phase through him
Maybe he makes the soles of his feet vibrate a little less so they stick in place inside the wall, allowing him to push off it to keep going. As for liquids, I have no idea, maybe he can vibrate them too, but it just seems like they would absorb the vibrations and so he would have no effect on them.
@@JonHexHead This is actually correct. He has to consciously make sure he doesnt phase through the floor. There was one episode (IDK which, I'm pretty sure it was in S5) where Flash loses control of his abilities and starts phasing uncontrollably. Often through walls, but also through the floor as well. A couple minutes later, the team get him to stand above one of the power-damping cells so when he falls through the floor, they can turn on the dampers and stop him from phasing until they figured out what happened.
10:10 - I confused my 1st grade teacher severly before. I taught myself on my own a way to solve math easily. I had the correct answers but I threw the teacher off because I was doing it in a highschool level way... Whoops. Wait, if a teacher did not understand that simple math, what are they hiring as teachers?
10:49 Not the "shots fired" joke 😭😭😭💀💀💀
1:46 So this basically comes down to the idea that, when you think about it, there's no recognized scientific classification for what a "fish" is.
Birds and mammals have classifications, but not fish.
This is because sea life comes with a wide variety of different creatures, and most of them aren't even that closely related. For example, a salmon is more closely related to a camel than it is to a hagfish.
So this opens up the idea that, since there is no one clearly defined idea of what a "fish" is, really anything that lives in the sea, like dolphins, can be described as a type of fish.
It's like when you learn there are more than 3 states of matter, where something you thought was easily defined is actually a lot more complicated than you originally thought
It's in the same vein as "reptile". Because taxonomically bird descended from therapod dinosaurs, birds can be called reptiles, but that's absolutely not how we use the weird "reptile" lol
If you get Damien to read this subreddit, he would research every single meme.
2:00 Dolphins are mammals, and mammals are a type of fish, and so is every tetrapod.
7:31 Actually, physics explain HOW a ball roll. The WHY is much more complicated and better left to the speculations of philosophy...
16:28 Under normal circumstances, you could jump up and down on a moving car and not fly back, however, that car appears to be moving really fast, so you would be slowed down by wind resistance if you tried to jump. Though it is fully possible to do the trick if the car was moving slower or you were sheltered from the wind.
The car also has to maintain a constant speed. Any acceleration or deceleration and it will ruin your day.
2:00 ALL live emerged from water -> fish goes on land -> fish becomes mammal -> mammal goes back into water -> mammal grows fins again -> Dolphin
I use the Anlian calendar. Every month is 4 weeks, but the month of Angel is split up so that each week of it covers a cross quarter day (Aug 1, Nov 1, Feb 1, and May 1). When the Anlian calendar shifts from the Gregorian calendar I insert or skip a week. I only have to do this around one year in every 4. The remaining months approximate the the Gregorian months very well except the week of the new month which is Angel, the previous month week 4, or the next month week 1. The seasons are labeled and the year starts with the August Angel week. The week that starts tomorrow is Season 2, Month 2, week 1, or the first week of December. It is Saturday December 2nd right now.
0:41 That baby is 2 years and 8 months old, why does it look so young.
2:12 All animals that have a spine (I forgot what the English term was, we call them kičmenjaci in Serbocroatian) share a common ancestor. A common ancestor that was very likely an early form of fish. Which means that, technically, all amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals are fish
In English, we call them “vertebrates.” The “vertebrae” are the bones that make up the spinal column.
6:19 is why I could never be a teacher, I'd always give the smartass kids a 100.
18:36 Well actually if we take our current position as a reference point than we don't need to do anything except travel back in time.
2:23 If it is possible to refute this, I don't want to. I don't want anybody to. It's just too perfect.
The 13 month calendar wouldn't work as well on leap years. And like, wouldn't leap years also offset the Monday start/Sunday end model and not reset for the following year?
16:50 the meme is accurate, because the air resistance is the thing that is pushing the person back
I think one of the only college degrees you can get that will make you money is engineering. We always need more of those. None of the more fun ones are good for jobs unless you're gonna try to make it as self employed.
6:03
Terry Pratchett also wrote about technology that most primitive societies discover early on. (Can't remember what it's called)
Except humans.
18:37 this is why every Time Machine is also a teleporter.
20:16 i can walk trough walls but not without a specific tool THE DOOR!
10:56 JACK, *NO!!!!*
2:50 No, the magnetic force of the poles cannot overcome the gravitational force of the planets
5:17 CHARGE YOUR PHONE
08:55 That is one of the main reasons why I, first year chem student, stopped watching Breaking Bad. Anyone with decent chemistry knowledge would use a base to dissolve a body.
9:29 he missed the the second media
I collapsed laughing at "Join The Resistance," theres like 5 layers to that joke
Anyone else have a batshit crazy science teacher literally everyone loves?
So, I wasn’t there for this, but this was told to me by said science teacher. So, there was some girl that went up to my science teacher and hit her. Straight up glocked her in front the whole class. “You can’t hit me cause teachers can’t hit their students.” She said. Well, the most reasonable thing would be to tell the school board right? Wrong. She waited. She waited until she saw this student in the mall with her mom and walked right up to her, and punched her. Then these mofos started laughing and this girls mom was so confused 💀
1:20-1:23 that crisp at the end makes that bit 100 % better
Telling a baby’s age in months is because there’s a lot of development that happens over the span of 1-2 years
12:20 yeah, it could feed you for the rest of your life. Won't be that long
Most researchers want you to read their papers. That way you can quote them, giving them valuable researcher points.
1:06 thats what happens to stars when they about to explode, they compress and collapse in on itself and then blow up
Space being littered with dead frozen chrono-naughts because they didn't have a star ship to time travle in.
@1:55 There is no monophyletic group that includes tuna and sharks but excludes mammals. Monophyletic means a common ancestor and all its descendants - which you could call a "family" in the human sense, although "family" means something more specific in taxonomic sense. All tetrapods (e.g. frogs, crocodiles, humans, whales, dinosaurs and birds) are descendants of 'lobe-finned fish'. You are more closely related to tuna than tuna is to sharks. If you only use "fish" to refer to "ray-finned fish" then humans aren't fish, but then coelacanths and sharks would also not be fish.
And our lungfish bros
I can explain the dolphins are a type of fish. It comes back to that you never out evolove through lineages, that is to say, a human will always be a great ape, no matter what forms we may take in the future. And going back far enough, humans, evolved from fish, meaning that we, in a sense are fish
Not all water dwellers are fish. That's a misconception by itself. Lots of non fish creatures dwell in the oceans. It's more likely we were some kind of bacteria or fungus than a fish that evolved into a land dweller.
@@AIHumanEquality r/confidentlyincorrect I'm sorry, but you are way off the mark with that one. The cellular structure of bacteria and fungi are far more different to those of members of the animal kingdom than fish cells are to human cells. DNA analysis will show you the closer evolutionary relationship, It has long since ben demonstrated that we have evolved from fish through DNA and anatomical markers.
Source: Degree in biochemistry and molecular genetics.
@@AIHumanEquality Well, yeah. The point though is that us mammals can trace our lineage back to fish though. Not that only fish live in the sea
@@MetallicPetals We can? That's news to me considering we don't even know what our original species was.
@@TheDiplococcus So no one's ever told you we share some DNA with plants and fungi huh?
We had a fig once, i was supposed to eat it, i looked up how to eat the fig, but the fig was gone, as if it only was a figment of my imagination.
2:02 Hello, Peter here!
Basically, dolphins are, in principle, a type of mammal, since they descended from a mammalian ancestor, and since animals cannot outgrow their classifications, they are still considered mammals, despite looking nothing like one.
However, since animals cannot outgrow their classification in taxonomy, means that dolphins are still a type of fish, more in specific, a lobe-finned fish, as their earliest ancestors, such as the Tiktaalik, were lobe-finned fish that crawled out of the water, and since you cannot outgrow your classification, means that EVERY animal that descended from that fish, from dolphins to humans to lizards to birds and frogs, are all a type of lobe-finned fish.
This is also the same reason, why birds are classified as a type of dinosaur and a type of reptile, or also why insects are classified as a type of crustacean.
2:10 no! no...
Seals are sea puppies
6:00
As my father's friend durring a roleplay campaign once had their crazy scientist character say: "We pump our air full of toxins to weed out the weak lunged! We detonate nuclear weapons in our *ONLY* biosphere, We Nailed our god TO A PEICE OF WOOD! *DO NOT FUCK WITH THE HUMAN RACE!*"
They are a mammal , but that doesn't mean they aren't a TYPE of fish. They are also a TYPE of mammal.
Dolphins at are cetaceans (with whales). Cetaceans are mammals. Mammals are tetrapods. Tetrapods are vertebrates. Vertebrates are animals.
No organism ever outgrows their ancestry 😁
1:21 the way you said paywalled
The Mahi-Mahi, also called dolphin, is a fish. Also a species in the same Genus is called the, Pompano Dolphinfish.
1:05 All you astrologers out there, please correct me if I'm wrong. Isn't the sun shrinking then growing the star turning into a red giant? And isn't that signs that it's going to, possibly, go nova or super nova?
Yes and no. the sun is not a big enough star to end in a supernova, but it *will* have a red giant phase. as the sun's core of hydrogen begins converting into heavier substances, it will simply shrink.
I'm just misremebering from a old youtube video but when the sun eventually dies, it will likely end up as a white dwarf holding about half of the mass of the sun as it is now. Which would be significantly colder but would still radiate light longer than the lifespan of every living star at this moment. Infact, white dwarfs lose heat so slowly that it's likely that the first black dwarf (white dwarf but approaching 0 kelvin) would likely be considered the beginning of the end in terms of the heat death of the universe.
1:30 this depends on the authors....but a lot of them are doing the science to spread knowledge so it is pretty normal for the authors to have no issue giving you a copy
Dolphins are fish because all vertebrates evolved from (prehistoric) fish, so therefore dolphins are fish, as are humans.
For context of the meme robin couldn’t understand at 1:57 …
*evil singing voice*
HERE’S A LITTLE LESSON IN TAXONOMY!~
12:57 this is why vitamin B17 is in fact not toxic to any cells except cancer cells even though it has a cyanide molecule as part of the compound.
If you traveled back billions of years, would the expansion of spacetime be noticeable?
Potassium argon and uranium lead are the most common dating method
Finally something I knew that’s vices rhino
16:29 in a vacuum thats an entirely different discussion. for one theyd both be dead🤣
17:38 ever touched a 9v battery to your own tongue? (yes itll shock you but not a lot)
That last post is very awkwardly phrased
The jist is
For some problems and some kids, it's easier to make other numbers out of those provided
Think about 2 groups of pennies
If I have 8 on one side and 9 on the other, it can feel a little awkward to add those numbers up in my head. I can do it, but it might be a little slow because I overthink it
But if I take one penny from the 8 group and put it in the 9 group?
Suddenly it's 7+10!
That's easy, 17, I understand that immediately because 10 is an easy number to work with quickly!
So the question should have said
'Working with tens can make addition easier! What's one way we can make a 10 out of 8 and 9, and what do you get when adding them together?'
This prompts a closer look at the two, a likely realization that 2 removed from 9, or 1 removed from 8, will result in 10+7, which they can write down to show they understand, and then add that the answer is 17!
It's a weird method for some questions, but giving tools of all sorts to find an answer, even if they all find the same answer, is important to finding what works best with each brain!
A bit like blindly testing a screw with multiple screwdrivers to see which head works best to fit it and screw it in cleanly ^^
Some folks prefer finding a 5, 7, 2, 3, ect
And bigger calcs might do better when looking for a way to make a 100
And this method of moving pennies around into tidier groups is great for those that work better with it! ^^
If I do not have paper or a calculator, I try to find 10s. It makes it easier to do in my head.
Half the time I adjust to something easier in base 10, and half the time I adjust to base 2. It's way easier for me to to math in binary than decimal in a lot of cases. I guess that's my love for computer science showing (mixed with me just liking to do things differently than most in general). Shifting perspectives is very helpful.
(but I didn't understand what the goal of that post was in the first place anyway, so thank you for explaining it. It definitely could've been worded better, but I still feel like I should've understood it...)
19:59 unfortunately, it's all luck based and the chance of quantum tunneling decreases with the thickness of the wall, mass of the object and such. if you are lucky, you might get half of your cells through an atom thick wall. here's the equation to calculate it so I sound smart: P= e^(-2KL) where L is the width of the barrier and K is I don't even know don't ask pls
I love Jack doing these
3:19 don't exactly get the brain and the balls on this one but i've heard that if your immune system "found about" your eyes it would probably eat them out.
Monks in medieval times considered dolphins “fish,” so they could eat dolphin on Fridays.
That’s why he has a monks cowl on
2:06: it's because under the modern claid system of cladiastics, everything that evolves form one group is still that thing, so humans are still apes, and thus are still monkeys, and ever scence every vertebrate came from fish, all vertebrates are still fish (although anyone who actually knows what they are talking about also knows the term "fish" is redundant and has no real value evolutionary cladiastics)
That logic is ridiculously dumb. Evolved forms of creatures are not the same as what they evolved from billions of years ago.
@@AIHumanEquality and that's why they also kept the old lemarkian system around ( you know, genius, spieces, family, kingdom, ECT) and use it in conjunction with the new system and use it as a bench mark to help keep everything organized.
I'm trying to figure out why, German born and raised Einstein was given an posh English accent in this.
Better then any goat I’ve ever drew 🐏
A new subreddit! Yay!
"And his favourite pokemon is suicune" LOL
Whether the person at 16:33 would fall off depends on 1. If the vehicle is accelerating/deccelerating and 2. Air resistance.
If the vehicle is accelerating enough or is fast enough that air resistance pushes the guy back then he will fall off, but if its going at constant speed ignoring the effects of air resistance then no, he will not
As a kid I rly thought those star signs actually looked like the cute animals and such, so I was massively disappointed when I learned they, in fact, were not.
in 16:35, the guy is also going at the speed of the car si he would not fling backwards.
actually yea he wld slow down cus of air resistance and if he gets enough air time hes gonna go flying back im a dumbass 😭
1:52 because its long been theorized that we are all commonly descended from fish that evolved out of water. basically many (or all, idk) vertebrates descend from that ancestor
so, it a technical sense, dolphins are a type of fish (that got out of water, evolved into a mammal and then went back in it)
idk I could be wrong.
The irony of self-censoring sh*t as shmit when talking about circuitry, it immediately reminded me that Schmitt triggers exist to clean up electrical signals in circuits
"The Road Not Taken" is a fantastic short story!
18:40 I think the supergirl show did mention this, I think brainiac was mad no one appreciated him and was going on a rant on how hard Time travel is bc it’s also space travel and he has to calculate the movement of the earth too.
2:26
timestamp.
5:35
that makes perfect sense
12:18
fish_fucked420, i have found you
18:37 that woulsd explain the Relative Dimension bit of TARDIS.
Jack singing bits
1:01
1:20
6:57
9:31
12:57
15:51
16:22