Poe, Lacan, Derrida

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ม.ค. 2023
  • This video gives a brief overview of Edgar Allan Poe's story "The Purloined Letter," then discusses, first, Jacques Lacan’s analysis of the tale, and then Jacques Derrida’s challenge to that analysis. This path requires a look at Ferdinand de Saussure's structural linguistics as well.
    Enormous thanks to Izzie Murphy, whose marvelous illustrations appear throughout. For her work on the project Ms. Murphy was awarded an Undergraduate Research Grant for Creative Activity by Kennesaw State University.

ความคิดเห็น • 26

  • @entrelaslineas7339
    @entrelaslineas7339 9 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    I did not expect to find such a clear and thoughtful explanation of the Purloined letter on TH-cam, thank you for the help with my seminar on Derrida!

  • @spuds5379
    @spuds5379 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    this is the most clear ive ever been on lacans lecture on the purloined letter

    • @BrianArtese
      @BrianArtese  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      great to hear, seriously

    • @dethkon
      @dethkon หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Todd McGowan does a pretty great job, but I like this guy’s narrative, theatrical flair!

  • @josierozell
    @josierozell ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Wow, what a great video! Why has this not been viewed thousands of times?

    • @BrianArtese
      @BrianArtese  ปีที่แล้ว

      thanks for watching!

    • @dethkon
      @dethkon หลายเดือนก่อน

      TH-camrs generally prefer to stay locked up in their caves (rightly so).

  • @alessandromartina644
    @alessandromartina644 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Besides the brilliant interpretation you gave of Poe Lacan Derrida triangle, I want to note that you have such love and compasion for others to make an elaborate video to share your knowledge. Since I lost mine I wonder where such loves come from!

  • @vasily8315
    @vasily8315 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I've watched your introduction to post-structuralism just today and now I m watching this, great creation !
    It encourages me to keep reading all these authors that are often "criticized" (if not insulted, made fun of) by people that barely gave any attention to their work.
    It's funny that I am french, and sometimes understand better certain concepts when explained in english videos like yours !
    Thanks for being a step in this weird journey !

    • @BrianArtese
      @BrianArtese  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Merci bien! Welcome

    • @dethkon
      @dethkon หลายเดือนก่อน

      If someone tells you not to read someone, read them immediately IMO!

  • @Fakery
    @Fakery 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Absolutely lovely work! Beautiful! Bravo! Encore!!

    • @BrianArtese
      @BrianArtese  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      wow thank you!

  • @vekipavicic3812
    @vekipavicic3812 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Brilliant, keep it coming :))))

    • @BrianArtese
      @BrianArtese  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      thank you!

  • @jedje
    @jedje 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    very good, bravo.

  • @dethkon
    @dethkon หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ok I’ve been won over. SUBSCRIBED.

  • @user-ci2ff5xf1q
    @user-ci2ff5xf1q 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Lacan described a continual slippage of the signified under the signifier which, for neurotic subjects, is stabilized at 'points de capiton' ("quilting/attachment points). Whence their failure, psychotic experience affirms their tenuous hold.

    • @BrianArtese
      @BrianArtese  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, but the slippage Lacan is talking about is the sign of neurosis and even psychosis. For the "normal" individual, the expected Saussurean "attachment" holds. (whereas for Derrida there is no dichotomy, nothing to be "linked" in the first place)

    • @dethkon
      @dethkon หลายเดือนก่อน

      Let’s quilt this session here, shall we?

  • @Anabsurdsuggestion
    @Anabsurdsuggestion ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent work. Subscribed.

  • @vincentbleuze5088
    @vincentbleuze5088 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video, thanks a lot! I was wondering what the difference is between this alterity/play that enables reading/the process of signification and the Lacanian phallus (the -1, the zero signifier that seems to function in a similar way). Thanks in advance to anyone who can help me with this question!

    • @BrianArtese
      @BrianArtese  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for watching! I can't quite see an analogy where you're pointing, but that's probably because there's a limit to my Lacan. Too deep a cut, maybe!

  • @screensaves
    @screensaves 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    xx