I'm a retired Old Fart and lay philosopher and I heartily second @aaspookyaa's comment! IMO we humans are very dependent upon in-depth outside-the-square thinking such as Chiara Marletto's for our future survival and thriving!
A light switch in the off position has no energy flowing through it, but the potential remains at both poles of the switch regardless. The trick is to discover the mechanism for what flipped the switch, not whether or not potential was present. Obviously, in the case of our universe, potential must have existed because the universe does in fact, exist. If the law of conservation is true in perpetuity, then there must have been a universal energy potential in stasis which was equal to that of the entire universe prior to the big bang. The "prior" of time being the equal in potential to measured time, which factors as a conservation of time the same as potential energy is conserved. The assumed "stopped time" within the heart of black holes does not shed potential of existence through time and over time because the features of its existence (as confined within a detectable super-massive gravitational body) can be measured as a point and place in time and over time. Thus the "no time" exists as a 'feature potential' over time, which must eventually balance to an equilibrium in time given the known rules of universal conservation and entropy smoothing.
Nice explanations. Fascinating concept. Your book is next on my list. (thought the hanging objects on the doorway behind were an African sculpture at first)
What, are you asserting that Chiara Marletto was not clear in what she was saying? I thought CM did pretty well actually. I have not yet read her book; in fact today is the first time I have encountered the term _constructor theory_ but now, after listening to CM's responses to the few questions that were asked I can see how the idea of a set of universal constructors has great potential. As far as can currently see, constructors must be embodied algorithmic entities, but they are/will not be all embodied in the same kinds of media/physical system.
@@xodarapive watched a few videos with her and she only explains that "constructors exist" and that seems to be where the explanation ends. How is this new verbiage useful? Lets see it in some application.
Sequence ⭐️+1 bit - to use natural atoms around us to create - anything the rules allow! 1bit of dense information - structural time. Using time mechanics & mathematics! ♾4D depth not horizontal Each information structure is a independent technology. Elemental Algorithm A sequence of mathematical interactions recreated via Fibonacci, prime mn ++ sets = preload last bit data! Braided create a unique sequence through infinity information to collect pre entanglement information. Universe / persons - choices = Updates 1bit - @ each infinite moment! Same 1 bit holds compressed time information - all previous to current information no need for previous loads! All can be extrapolated from 1bit. Each moment is 1bit updating No space - depth in time! The sequence expands & retracts! P N P for children of Ai ? Increasing information thus entropy! Decay! Raw atomic information turned into - Organic built - technologies? You just need the code! The or a specific- Sequence. Zero else.. Organic computer🤓🖖♾ Geometric information structures Geometric moments Geometric timeline Geometric Time-lines Geometric universes! INTERCHANGEABLE Paths in information! TO? 🌬⭐️ mergeability ..not a word is now for a moment. Priceless information- screenshot have it checked. Come curse me if wrong! 😊😌🖖 welcome to DMs are open.
I'm an armchair amateur physicist, and the human race is so elevated by brave thinkers like yourself. I'm a big fan!
I'm a retired Old Fart and lay philosopher and I heartily second @aaspookyaa's comment! IMO we humans are very dependent upon in-depth outside-the-square thinking such as Chiara Marletto's for our future survival and thriving!
A light switch in the off position has no energy flowing through it, but the potential remains at both poles of the switch regardless. The trick is to discover the mechanism for what flipped the switch, not whether or not potential was present. Obviously, in the case of our universe, potential must have existed because the universe does in fact, exist. If the law of conservation is true in perpetuity, then there must have been a universal energy potential in stasis which was equal to that of the entire universe prior to the big bang. The "prior" of time being the equal in potential to measured time, which factors as a conservation of time the same as potential energy is conserved. The assumed "stopped time" within the heart of black holes does not shed potential of existence through time and over time because the features of its existence (as confined within a detectable super-massive gravitational body) can be measured as a point and place in time and over time. Thus the "no time" exists as a 'feature potential' over time, which must eventually balance to an equilibrium in time given the known rules of universal conservation and entropy smoothing.
Nice explanations. Fascinating concept. Your book is next on my list. (thought the hanging objects on the doorway behind were an African sculpture at first)
Why can't I meet someone like her in the US? She thinks.
Good day dear professor chiara marletto❣️
Is dissolving of matter into photon related to dark energy?
Smile
english being a second language is a barrier to the clear expression of ideas imo
What, are you asserting that Chiara Marletto was not clear in what she was saying?
I thought CM did pretty well actually. I have not yet read her book; in fact today is the first time I have encountered the term _constructor theory_ but now, after listening to CM's responses to the few questions that were asked I can see how the idea of a set of universal constructors has great potential.
As far as can currently see, constructors must be embodied algorithmic entities, but they are/will not be all embodied in the same kinds of media/physical system.
@@xodarapive watched a few videos with her and she only explains that "constructors exist" and that seems to be where the explanation ends. How is this new verbiage useful? Lets see it in some application.
Sequence ⭐️+1 bit - to use natural atoms around us to create - anything the rules allow!
1bit of dense information - structural time.
Using time mechanics & mathematics! ♾4D depth not horizontal
Each information structure is a independent technology.
Elemental Algorithm
A sequence of mathematical interactions recreated via Fibonacci, prime mn ++ sets = preload last bit data!
Braided create a unique sequence through infinity information to collect pre entanglement information.
Universe / persons - choices = Updates 1bit - @ each infinite moment!
Same 1 bit holds compressed time information - all previous to current information no need for previous loads!
All can be extrapolated from 1bit.
Each moment is 1bit updating
No space - depth in time!
The sequence expands & retracts!
P N P for children of Ai ?
Increasing information thus entropy!
Decay!
Raw atomic information turned into - Organic built - technologies? You just need the code! The or a specific- Sequence. Zero else..
Organic computer🤓🖖♾
Geometric information structures
Geometric moments
Geometric timeline
Geometric Time-lines
Geometric universes!
INTERCHANGEABLE Paths in information! TO? 🌬⭐️ mergeability ..not a word is now for a moment.
Priceless information- screenshot have it checked. Come curse me if wrong! 😊😌🖖 welcome to DMs are open.
I am basically just waiting for you to screw this thing up down the way...
Because it is, honestly, a very good idea, it can't stand like that.