With this message I am VERY surprised your channel got recommended to me at all. Usually TH-cam would have silently blacklisted you and moved on about their day... guess they are slipping up.
The Lord bless you and keep you; the Lord make his face shine on you and be gracious to you; the Lord turn his face toward you and give you peace. Numbers 6:24-26
I think something important to note is that the group you're talking about are socially leftists. I don't think this really applies to people who are economically leftists but not socially left wing.
My biggest problem with modern Leftistism is that the only way that a society can progress economically is by exploiting differences in a transactional nature. The very nature of freedom will lead to disparities, sometimes massive disparities. If there were perfect equity (which, although not all Leftists are communists, is the end goal of at least anarcho-communism, which is not as bad as some forms of communism/governmentally-mandated secular states we saw in the 20th century), there would be no economic growth, unless you have external entities appropriating/giving by force the difference in economic outcomes from the average of the state’s inhabitants. Are some differences unjustified from a moral perspective? Yes, but by which moral perspective, because the morals of a culture are variable. So then you have a constant churn of forceful appropriation/deliverance using varied morals to guide said appropriation/deliverance. The more a society progresses economically, the less egalitarian (materially-speaking) it will become in the relative sense, but the more equal it will be come on a historical level. It used to be that only the richest individuals in a society could stay cool in the hot summer months (whether it be using large blocks of ice to cool an area), but now almost everyone in the US has access to air conditioning. Caloric intake is another, to the point where obesity is a matter of public health concern in the West. I think the main issue with leftism is that there is never a standard by which success can be attained, except if equity is the ultimate goal and eventually, everyone’s economic outcome is and remains the same relative to others. I mean, even going to the local market and buying some bread will make someone “richer” and the other “poorer” from an economic point of view, but that is what “free” economies are built on, mutual exchange. Mutual exchange always results in “inequality,” because one can always change the parameters of “equality” to support and advance their favored cause.
I grew up in the 2000's and i found pop music to have always been degenerate not as much as today from what i watched but i agree that music today is garbage in comparison.
I would agree with basically all the things you said except for the main premise. All those things dont make a religion a religion. Look at the punk movement. It has everything you described in this video. It had a clear goal, to dismantle the establishment (wether in the music industry or also beyond), they definitely "excommunicated" people who are not "real punks", they had their own rituals, aesthetics and to a certain extend had similar values and looks on the world. Still would you call punkism a religion? I wouldnt. cultural movement sure, but there was no punk bible, there were no punk temples (unless would say the concert venue was the punk temple, which might be stretching the definition a bit too much). I guess you could actually stretch the definition of religion to include leftism but then you would also have to consoder hippieism, punkism, gansterism, gamerism, gothism, emoism and much more as religions, since they all have the things you described in this vid and "religion" would basically be synonymous with "(sub)cultural movement".
@@hanoord9412 White privilege and the whole be less white. The black and white there is only the oppressor and the oppressed. That minorities can't be ist and phobic.
Leftism DOES have holy texts and sacred places, though. They also have prophets, martyrs, and schismatics. They even have original sin (being born an "oppressor" demographic). "Punkism" isn't a religion, but a lot of punks (ESPECIALLY modern punks, who missed the message that the punk movement died 30 years ago, and are mostly just Leftists cosplaying as punks) ARE leftists. The punk movement is more like a denomination of Leftism than its own religion. Or, perhaps, *postmodernism* is the actual religious movement (comparable to being "Christian") and both punkism and modern religious leftism, which grew out of the postmodern New Left Movement of the 1960s, are TYPES of postmodernism; with religious leftism having grown to become the dominant type of postmodernism (sort of like how Nicene Christianity beat out the Arians and Nestorians to become the dominant type of Christianity), with its own "lines" like Communist and Social Democrat (the equivalent of things like "Catholic", "Anglican", and "Methodist"), and specific movements and organizations like the Black Power Movement or Democratic Socialists of America, are like the specific denominations (the United Methodist Church, Presbyterian Church USA, Russian Orthodox Church, etc). But ignoring the specifics of HOW all the postmodern and New Leftist ideologies fit together, I think the thing that makes leftism a religion, compared to all those other things, is not just the fact that they have an eschatology, but the specific existential purpose he describes: the need to create a Heaven on Earth for Leftists and a Hell on Earth for all who oppose them. EG: Sin and Salvation.
@@IncredibleMD (I'm aware this is an old comment) What holy texts? And what sacred places? What eschatology do they have. What prophets are there? And not all leftists are white, they also can't take their heritage away from them. And while we are on the topic of ideologies, why does this conversation fail to mention the cult-like behaviour of conservatives? Conservative Christians only ever talk about the opposition and never about themselves, failing to understand their own conversation and the nuances. This is also relevant to leftists.
There’s some mad leftists in this comment section criticizing Redeemed Zoomer. I guess his point is that leftism acts like a fundamental religion in a way, not that it’s a literal religion with its own temples or whatever.
The point of Leftism is its development which stands in direct contradiction of Leftism. For instance, we part with certain ideas of certain philosophers.
I am socialist because God has guided me to that path. It is the righteous path and it is how we may bridge heaven and earth. God does not want us to abandon our fellow humans. Too many religious people, especially evangelical protestant christians like yourself, only care about getting themselves and their family into heaven, rather than restoring the garden. And they only pretend to care because their dialog with others, they just want to surround themselves with a bubble that wont challenge their views just so they can get themselves into heaven. They don't want to save others. So many christians proselytizing, but so few giving charity. So many claiming to care for others, yet so few actually trying to save the Earth and restore the global community of believers and the righteous garden of eden. So many christians claiming to care about righteousness yet not attempting to fight the unjust systems, like capitalism and other systems of greed that rule over us and that the people world over idolize and worship. This is what faith should ultimately be comprised of: “And they were commanded no more than this. To worship God, Offering him sincere devotion, being true (in faith), to establish regular prayer, and to practice regular charity; And that is the religion. Right and straight.” Qur'an, Surah (Chapter) 98:5
I agree; however, socialism is forcing others to be good (I am generalizing). Being a Christian means you must do better and not force others to do good. From what I can see we should encourage more charity out of goodwill so that more people (even those who are not Christian) will follow.
"so many christians proselytizing but so few giving charity" what world do you live in Christians are the most charitable group in the world ever. Reformed zoomer is not an evangelical It is impossible to restore the garden of Eden because of original sin Socialism is not charity Socialism is forcefully taking from those who have and giving to those who do not. Socialism requires stealing because there is never a circumstance in which everyone agrees to give up their possessions unless it is on a miniature scale and therefore breaks the 8th commandment.
Leftism describes the range of political ideologies that support and seek to achieve social equality and egalitarianism, often in opposition to social hierarchy. Left-wing politics typically involve a concern for those in society whom its adherents perceive as disadvantaged relative to others as well as a belief that there are unjustified inequalities that need to be reduced or abolished through radical means that change the nature of the society they are implemented in. Human development flourishes when individuals engage in cooperative, mutually respectful relations that can thrive only when excessive differences in status, power, and wealth are eliminated. Matthew 19:23-24 - Then Jesus said to His disciples, “Assuredly, I say to you that it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. And again I say to you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God
When George Floyd was killed, by brother was initially confused as to why people were so up in arms over it, because he was trying to determine the logical reason they were so mad, and the only video evidence he could find was from earlier in the encounter, before the police brutality. People were so incensed that they weren't actually sharing the reason why they were incensed, and asking them to explain was considered sinful because it was so obvious. It was only after a bit of time had passed and the extended footage became more wildly available that he even found out a cop kneeled on Floyd's neck for nine minutes, let alone found the video evidence of it. And even that, he had to find those out for himself. Of course, none of that excuses the violent destruction of property that followed, but leftist morality is based on the morality of the motivation, not the morality of the action. "It's okay when WE do it, because we're on the right side of history". He also wondered how the Democratic Party was going to be able to condemn the January 6th riot, after a year of actively supporting far more violent and destructive politically-motivated riots. Of course, he forgot about leftist doublethink, so he didn't realize they were going to just ignore that fact. More generally, even asking for the context of a video clip, or what happened before the clip, or even before the camera started rolling, is a sin. If the priests have deemed it outrageous, it must be. What matters is only what happened in said clip. I can't even count how many unarmed black men I've seen shot by police after open firing on them. Think about that for a moment: An UNARMED black man OPEN FIRED on police. And we're supposed to get mad the cops shot back.
Incredible, the best religion - may God propagate our Holy word, and bring the words of his prophets (Marx, Lenin, Luxenberg, St. Andrewism ect.) bring forth Their great world.
4:49 What's the story about all those pride flags on that building next to your clock tower? I see the gay, trans, bi, pan (I think), and nonbinary flags on a building; did you build those yourself?
That’s the flag of progressive satanism a hostile religion entrenched in the US government, a state mandated religion, which wants nothing more than to wipe out all Christians.
So leftism is a religion because... it is an idealogy? What you're saying only works with a nebulous and vague idea of religion that's more symbolic than anything, and that could be applied to so many other idealogies. The only thing that pointed to religion was the idea of the unified goal of a leftist utopia, which is completely fabricated by you, considering that you yourself said that when you say 'leftist' you really just mean progressive and are detaching it from the political aspect. I could say that conservatism is a religion and therefore conservatives can not be 'truly Christians, because of how they worship traditional western family roles beyond anything in the bible and 'ex communicate' people who dont fall within it. Youre trying to intellectualize you being mad about people disagreeing with you, and it forces you to generalize and strawman constantly.
I've come to assert that one cannot be Christian and conservative at the same time; I see no inherent conflict with leftism (was MLK Jr. not a Christian?) Also your knowledge of the humanities, especially philosophy, is abysmal.
He's making it quite obvious that he is a religious person and he also made a point about how leftists would not admit they are religious, so I don't understand the purpose of your comment. He also made a lot of other good points if you even bothered to watch the video.
@@A_FantaEnthusiast I just watched the entire video for your sake. Not a single decent point was uttered. He’s simply comparing one political ideology to religion, and ignoring any right-wing ideology that would have a similar “you’re either with us or against us” mindset. Also, my point still stands that he thinks the “leftist religion” is bad because it’s religious - but not the “right religion”. He also makes the point that it would be unreasonable to believe in the resurrection if the only accounts came from 1000 years after the fact - which they didn’t, but there’s barely any written accounts of Jesus until about 100 years later. That’s still a large gap. Other “evidence” includes reports of people who share the same name as him or his brother or his father - all very common names in ancient Israel. If Jesus was so famous then why is there barely any evidence for his existence compared to someone like Augustus Caesar who lived at the same time?
Sir, I think you should look up the definition of "religion" in a dictionary. Also, as an atheist, I can assure you most of us don't want to "tear down Christianity" or whatever. We just want you lot to stop pushing your values onto literally everyone around you please and thank you.
“We just want you to stop pushing your values onto everyone else” Your side literally has religious months and parades where naked men ride bicycles down the street. And everyone must affirm and clap or else. You paint your religious symbols on the street and send law enforcement after a person who leaves skid marks on it. Who was then prosecuted for hate activity. You put the flag of your religion in center prominence over the flag of the United States on the White House. The equivalent would be me flying the flag of the papacy above the US flag on the White House. If I were to publicly burn the flag of the United States or the flag of the Catholic Church I would have no backlash as that is my “free speech”. If I were to publicly burn the flag of the Progressive religion I would be immediately fired from my job and likely criminally prosecuted. It’s blasphemy laws by a different name. Not only are you pushing your values on everyone else, you are using the state to do so. This is a state MANDATED religion, a STATE RELIGION. You unironically believe that people can change genders. This is a religious belief.
With this message I am VERY surprised your channel got recommended to me at all. Usually TH-cam would have silently blacklisted you and moved on about their day... guess they are slipping up.
I don't say things explicitly, I imply them. That's how I've avoided getting banned on all platforms.
@@redeemedzoomer6053 that's actually pretty smart
"I'm not saying there's a cabal of global elites, I mean there could be for all I know"
_Klaus Schwab sweats profusely_
The entire WEF*
The Lord bless you and keep you; the Lord make his face shine on you and be gracious to you; the Lord turn his face toward you and give you peace.
Numbers 6:24-26
ive been saying this for over 15 years
Theosophy is the New Thought religion. It fits right in with leftism. It is also moving in the churches.
I think something important to note is that the group you're talking about are socially leftists. I don't think this really applies to people who are economically leftists but not socially left wing.
Natsocs are just as dumb, know some of them and their understanding of politics is "i just wanna jail anyone with a different opinion".
@@ultra.based.27 I agree I was referring to Christian Socialists
@@bean835 oh, ok
They’re even worse. Filthy commies
Or mainly refers to the woke left.
6:29 Bro tried eating his axe 3 times 😹😹😹😹😹
My biggest problem with modern Leftistism is that the only way that a society can progress economically is by exploiting differences in a transactional nature. The very nature of freedom will lead to disparities, sometimes massive disparities. If there were perfect equity (which, although not all Leftists are communists, is the end goal of at least anarcho-communism, which is not as bad as some forms of communism/governmentally-mandated secular states we saw in the 20th century), there would be no economic growth, unless you have external entities appropriating/giving by force the difference in economic outcomes from the average of the state’s inhabitants.
Are some differences unjustified from a moral perspective? Yes, but by which moral perspective, because the morals of a culture are variable. So then you have a constant churn of forceful appropriation/deliverance using varied morals to guide said appropriation/deliverance. The more a society progresses economically, the less egalitarian (materially-speaking) it will become in the relative sense, but the more equal it will be come on a historical level. It used to be that only the richest individuals in a society could stay cool in the hot summer months (whether it be using large blocks of ice to cool an area), but now almost everyone in the US has access to air conditioning. Caloric intake is another, to the point where obesity is a matter of public health concern in the West.
I think the main issue with leftism is that there is never a standard by which success can be attained, except if equity is the ultimate goal and eventually, everyone’s economic outcome is and remains the same relative to others. I mean, even going to the local market and buying some bread will make someone “richer” and the other “poorer” from an economic point of view, but that is what “free” economies are built on, mutual exchange. Mutual exchange always results in “inequality,” because one can always change the parameters of “equality” to support and advance their favored cause.
I grew up in the 2000's and i found pop music to have always been degenerate not as much as today from what i watched but i agree that music today is garbage in comparison.
I would agree with basically all the things you said except for the main premise. All those things dont make a religion a religion. Look at the punk movement. It has everything you described in this video. It had a clear goal, to dismantle the establishment (wether in the music industry or also beyond), they definitely "excommunicated" people who are not "real punks", they had their own rituals, aesthetics and to a certain extend had similar values and looks on the world. Still would you call punkism a religion? I wouldnt. cultural movement sure, but there was no punk bible, there were no punk temples (unless would say the concert venue was the punk temple, which might be stretching the definition a bit too much). I guess you could actually stretch the definition of religion to include leftism but then you would also have to consoder hippieism, punkism, gansterism, gamerism, gothism, emoism and much more as religions, since they all have the things you described in this vid and "religion" would basically be synonymous with "(sub)cultural movement".
But leftists do have original sin and the elect though.
@@matthewvanburen6415 what?
@@hanoord9412 White privilege and the whole be less white. The black and white there is only the oppressor and the oppressed. That minorities can't be ist and phobic.
Leftism DOES have holy texts and sacred places, though. They also have prophets, martyrs, and schismatics. They even have original sin (being born an "oppressor" demographic).
"Punkism" isn't a religion, but a lot of punks (ESPECIALLY modern punks, who missed the message that the punk movement died 30 years ago, and are mostly just Leftists cosplaying as punks) ARE leftists. The punk movement is more like a denomination of Leftism than its own religion.
Or, perhaps, *postmodernism* is the actual religious movement (comparable to being "Christian") and both punkism and modern religious leftism, which grew out of the postmodern New Left Movement of the 1960s, are TYPES of postmodernism; with religious leftism having grown to become the dominant type of postmodernism (sort of like how Nicene Christianity beat out the Arians and Nestorians to become the dominant type of Christianity), with its own "lines" like Communist and Social Democrat (the equivalent of things like "Catholic", "Anglican", and "Methodist"), and specific movements and organizations like the Black Power Movement or Democratic Socialists of America, are like the specific denominations (the United Methodist Church, Presbyterian Church USA, Russian Orthodox Church, etc).
But ignoring the specifics of HOW all the postmodern and New Leftist ideologies fit together, I think the thing that makes leftism a religion, compared to all those other things, is not just the fact that they have an eschatology, but the specific existential purpose he describes: the need to create a Heaven on Earth for Leftists and a Hell on Earth for all who oppose them. EG: Sin and Salvation.
@@IncredibleMD (I'm aware this is an old comment)
What holy texts? And what sacred places? What eschatology do they have. What prophets are there? And not all leftists are white, they also can't take their heritage away from them.
And while we are on the topic of ideologies, why does this conversation fail to mention the cult-like behaviour of conservatives? Conservative Christians only ever talk about the opposition and never about themselves, failing to understand their own conversation and the nuances. This is also relevant to leftists.
There’s some mad leftists in this comment section criticizing Redeemed Zoomer. I guess his point is that leftism acts like a fundamental religion in a way, not that it’s a literal religion with its own temples or whatever.
The point of Leftism is its development which stands in direct contradiction of Leftism. For instance, we part with certain ideas of certain philosophers.
I am socialist because God has guided me to that path. It is the righteous path and it is how we may bridge heaven and earth. God does not want us to abandon our fellow humans. Too many religious people, especially evangelical protestant christians like yourself, only care about getting themselves and their family into heaven, rather than restoring the garden. And they only pretend to care because their dialog with others, they just want to surround themselves with a bubble that wont challenge their views just so they can get themselves into heaven. They don't want to save others. So many christians proselytizing, but so few giving charity. So many claiming to care for others, yet so few actually trying to save the Earth and restore the global community of believers and the righteous garden of eden. So many christians claiming to care about righteousness yet not attempting to fight the unjust systems, like capitalism and other systems of greed that rule over us and that the people world over idolize and worship.
This is what faith should ultimately be comprised of:
“And they were commanded no more than this. To worship God, Offering him sincere devotion, being true (in faith), to establish regular prayer, and to practice regular charity; And that is the religion. Right and straight.”
Qur'an, Surah (Chapter) 98:5
I agree; however, socialism is forcing others to be good (I am generalizing). Being a Christian means you must do better and not force others to do good. From what I can see we should encourage more charity out of goodwill so that more people (even those who are not Christian) will follow.
@@TheMulletOperator_77 that's not always the case though. My own country, ireland prevented contraception and divorce to appease the catholic church.
@@owenoceillaigh5899 yeah true I did say I was generalizing.
@@owenoceillaigh5899stoping bad and forcing good are not the same
"so many christians proselytizing but so few giving charity" what world do you live in
Christians are the most charitable group in the world ever.
Reformed zoomer is not an evangelical
It is impossible to restore the garden of Eden because of original sin
Socialism is not charity
Socialism is forcefully taking from those who have and giving to those who do not.
Socialism requires stealing because there is never a circumstance in which everyone agrees to give up their possessions unless it is on a miniature scale and therefore breaks the 8th commandment.
Leftism describes the range of political ideologies that support and seek to achieve social equality and egalitarianism, often in opposition to social hierarchy. Left-wing politics typically involve a concern for those in society whom its adherents perceive as disadvantaged relative to others as well as a belief that there are unjustified inequalities that need to be reduced or abolished through radical means that change the nature of the society they are implemented in. Human development flourishes when individuals engage in cooperative, mutually respectful relations that can thrive only when excessive differences in status, power, and wealth are eliminated.
Matthew 19:23-24 - Then Jesus said to His disciples, “Assuredly, I say to you that it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. And again I say to you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God
By that standard, self-described "Leftists" are alt-right.
When George Floyd was killed, by brother was initially confused as to why people were so up in arms over it, because he was trying to determine the logical reason they were so mad, and the only video evidence he could find was from earlier in the encounter, before the police brutality. People were so incensed that they weren't actually sharing the reason why they were incensed, and asking them to explain was considered sinful because it was so obvious. It was only after a bit of time had passed and the extended footage became more wildly available that he even found out a cop kneeled on Floyd's neck for nine minutes, let alone found the video evidence of it. And even that, he had to find those out for himself.
Of course, none of that excuses the violent destruction of property that followed, but leftist morality is based on the morality of the motivation, not the morality of the action. "It's okay when WE do it, because we're on the right side of history". He also wondered how the Democratic Party was going to be able to condemn the January 6th riot, after a year of actively supporting far more violent and destructive politically-motivated riots. Of course, he forgot about leftist doublethink, so he didn't realize they were going to just ignore that fact.
More generally, even asking for the context of a video clip, or what happened before the clip, or even before the camera started rolling, is a sin. If the priests have deemed it outrageous, it must be. What matters is only what happened in said clip. I can't even count how many unarmed black men I've seen shot by police after open firing on them. Think about that for a moment: An UNARMED black man OPEN FIRED on police. And we're supposed to get mad the cops shot back.
From the autopsy it was also found that george floyd had a lot of drugs in his system and that he was resisting arrest too
Incredible, the best religion - may God propagate our Holy word, and bring the words of his prophets (Marx, Lenin, Luxenberg, St. Andrewism ect.) bring forth Their great world.
May the good book guide you back to the path of truth, comrade
4:49 What's the story about all those pride flags on that building next to your clock tower? I see the gay, trans, bi, pan (I think), and nonbinary flags on a building; did you build those yourself?
To the same question someone else posed, he answered:"I'm not the only one on the server."
That’s the flag of progressive satanism a hostile religion entrenched in the US government, a state mandated religion, which wants nothing more than to wipe out all Christians.
@@LiamN4321what?
when you're in a lying about your opponents positions contest and your opponent is redeemed zoomer
So leftism is a religion because... it is an idealogy? What you're saying only works with a nebulous and vague idea of religion that's more symbolic than anything, and that could be applied to so many other idealogies. The only thing that pointed to religion was the idea of the unified goal of a leftist utopia, which is completely fabricated by you, considering that you yourself said that when you say 'leftist' you really just mean progressive and are detaching it from the political aspect. I could say that conservatism is a religion and therefore conservatives can not be 'truly Christians, because of how they worship traditional western family roles beyond anything in the bible and 'ex communicate' people who dont fall within it. Youre trying to intellectualize you being mad about people disagreeing with you, and it forces you to generalize and strawman constantly.
This man is scared of dialectics
I've come to assert that one cannot be Christian and conservative at the same time; I see no inherent conflict with leftism (was MLK Jr. not a Christian?)
Also your knowledge of the humanities, especially philosophy, is abysmal.
The irony of religious people calling things they don’t like “religion”
👏👏
He's making it quite obvious that he is a religious person and he also made a point about how leftists would not admit they are religious, so I don't understand the purpose of your comment.
He also made a lot of other good points if you even bothered to watch the video.
@@A_FantaEnthusiast I just watched the entire video for your sake. Not a single decent point was uttered. He’s simply comparing one political ideology to religion, and ignoring any right-wing ideology that would have a similar “you’re either with us or against us” mindset. Also, my point still stands that he thinks the “leftist religion” is bad because it’s religious - but not the “right religion”. He also makes the point that it would be unreasonable to believe in the resurrection if the only accounts came from 1000 years after the fact - which they didn’t, but there’s barely any written accounts of Jesus until about 100 years later. That’s still a large gap. Other “evidence” includes reports of people who share the same name as him or his brother or his father - all very common names in ancient Israel. If Jesus was so famous then why is there barely any evidence for his existence compared to someone like Augustus Caesar who lived at the same time?
@@kcaustin904 KC, you’re right
Prove him wrong then
Sir, I think you should look up the definition of "religion" in a dictionary. Also, as an atheist, I can assure you most of us don't want to "tear down Christianity" or whatever. We just want you lot to stop pushing your values onto literally everyone around you please and thank you.
"we don't want to tear down your religion we just want you to not follow one of the core doctrines of your religion"
“We just want you to stop pushing your values onto everyone else”
Your side literally has religious months and parades where naked men ride bicycles down the street. And everyone must affirm and clap or else.
You paint your religious symbols on the street and send law enforcement after a person who leaves skid marks on it. Who was then prosecuted for hate activity.
You put the flag of your religion in center prominence over the flag of the United States on the White House. The equivalent would be me flying the flag of the papacy above the US flag on the White House.
If I were to publicly burn the flag of the United States or the flag of the Catholic Church I would have no backlash as that is my “free speech”.
If I were to publicly burn the flag of the Progressive religion I would be immediately fired from my job and likely criminally prosecuted. It’s blasphemy laws by a different name.
Not only are you pushing your values on everyone else, you are using the state to do so. This is a state MANDATED religion, a STATE RELIGION.
You unironically believe that people can change genders. This is a religious belief.
@@LiamN4321 Well said
@@LiamN4321great job at exposing their hypocrisy 👏