Group discussion typically should not go this way where the facilitator is prompting/inviting the participants one by one to share their opinion. Participants can directly contribute their responses after each other. This was a open group discussion where there's no right or wrong answer. Or there can be more than one right answer. There can be closed group discussion where there are right answers to which the group needs to reach and the facilitator will lead the discussion to reach those right answers
Thank you, Jena! This is great =) I'm going to use it in my class!
Group discussion typically should not go this way where the facilitator is prompting/inviting the participants one by one to share their opinion. Participants can directly contribute their responses after each other.
This was a open group discussion where there's no right or wrong answer. Or there can be more than one right answer.
There can be closed group discussion where there are right answers to which the group needs to reach and the facilitator will lead the discussion to reach those right answers
Great example of group discussion!!
I love it teacher! This Friday, Dec 2, 2016, we have a group discussion. :)
Thank you for idea in small group discussion❤️
I like the video, but I wish the volume were louder.
This is very benefitial
This is not good. This is not a discussion. This is 3 individual monologues with no back and forth.
Wait what....
Great , thanks
Some segments in the video are stamped not adjacent to each other
NGL yall sound like robots
CAN ALL OFF U TELL ME THE POINTS? COZ I CAN'T HEAR CLEARLY
1. Stress
2. Caffeine
3. Surrounding
「目標を指定してお金が必要」、
Not so special