@@Bibibosh How about you learn how to click the translation link that is right underneath every comment written in other languages? It's not that difficult.
between the time that each tower was hit and when it came down, there were multiple floors collapsing, causing "explosion" sounds. You can see videos and photos of the impact zones, where portions of the floors had already collapsed, and floors/ceilings were literally hanging off where they disconnected from the outer walls. You can also see, in various videos of seconds prior to the towers coming down, that floors were collapsing and debris was shooting out of the remaining windows on the top floors. This seems like a pretty legitimate reason for people to claim they heard "explosion"-type noises.
What I find strange is why is most of the lobby floor visible as soon as the dust settled, I thought the building's fell straight down all 110 floors of each tower, yet hardly any rubble and you can see clearly the majority of the lobby floor, how is that possible?
You can also listen to 3000 architects and engineers that have stood steadfast against the story we were told. Their knowledge of structural engineering says otherwise. Building have never collapsed prior to 9/11 or post 9/11 from fire or otherwise, only the WTC 1 & 2, oh and #7 that wasn’t hit by anything 7 Hours later, and we were told they “Pulled it” Explain that?
@@liampendragon9448 there are too many damn weird things about that day! Where did the buildings go, the piles of debris should have been giant, yet they weren’t. You can see in the videos even though they have edited a lot of them, that the Steel portions turn into Dust and the dust falls. Also, the building wouldn’t have fallen free fall unless there was no resistance at all, which would mean all of the floors below would have to be gone for free fall. But the story of a pancake collapse doesn’t work for free fall.
yes floors collapsing on top of eachother 100% can sound like that and you have to remember too that when fire heats anything up enough, it will explode. Who knows how many things that had the potential to explode that was inside the building. Heck if you throw a can of WD-40 into a campfire it will explode up in a mushroom cloud like a bomb
It is very possible. There were some people in the south tower trapped in the 100s that said in their phone calls to 911 that floors below them in the 90s were collapsing. Those calls were all before the collapse at 9:59
No one seems to talk about this, but i remember watching a video before 9/11 which was a documentary on thw towers being built. There was a small segment towards the end that talked about how they would handle thier demolition in the future when i became time to bring them down. They talked about how certain areas of the core had to be pre-wired for such as once built it would be to difficult to reach the areas where they would need to. I have been searching for that video since, but it seems to have been removed from youtube. Anyone else remember that video?
No, but research Ace Elevators. this small mysterious company was recently awarded the WTC contract, and they all immediately fled like cowards, leaving innocent people to burn to death and got maby good firefighters killed bc they were caught up trying to help people trapped in them abd had to retrieve a specific tool to manually open the doors since all of the mechanics scurried immediately like rats.
The elevator theory is highly unlikely. As an elevator mechanic, the elevator cab itself is equipped with 8 steel cables. One cable alone is enough to hoist the cab. Plus you have a governor cable that's separate from the 8 hoist cables. The governor is a flywheel mechanism that'll lock the cable, stopping the cab if goes into free fall.
@@chappyg5512 Great question. It's very easy. Go to the top level of the building. Program the control panel inside the cab. Leave the cab and key the cab down from the outside. Walk on top of the cab in the shaft. You'll find a controller on top of the cab for up, down, stop manually. So yeah it's very easy to rig columns because they're a part of the entire shaft for it's integrity. Because you have not only the cab weighing 5,000 lbs, plus there's a counterweight that weigh 7,500 lbs as well
The very very strange thing about this horrible event, all building falls perfectly straight down. And also wtc 7 building fall perfectly down only because of fire they mentioned afterwards. I also have seen that video and they all confirmed that there where explosions (they are professionals). There are so many strange things that happened that horrible day. Keep up the good hard work and hopefully we get more pictures and videos from you to see about this terrible event.
The reason why those buildings collapsed on themselves is because of the way they were engineered including the materials used. Only plain brick and concrete structures fall sideways. Lastly the so-called explosions heard from inside is to do with what happens when burning fuel combined with Aluminium and water from the sprinklers react together.
@@PSYCHIC_PSYCHO that’s indeed true also I saw one video from a firefighter who mentioned that these floors are really unstable and unsave to walk on. But nevertheless there are some many other strange things happening that day. Also on the stock exchange that day (inside information)? I really don’t know. Also this video released only 2 years ago! th-cam.com/video/o6t31R4tI10/w-d-xo.htmlsi=Ai5ZpaYPCBP2AiFY Exactly on the date that Russia invaded Ukraine …coincidence? Still the worst part is…the people who had died that day🙏god bless them all🙏
@@StripesNoCommentary Thanks for the link, but I watched that video yesterday. It was a most audacious and spectacular assault on a country in history, I can't imagine it ever being topped by any terrorist in the future.
Also, let's focus more on the Pentagon strike. Look at how perfectly this plane is flying level with the ground and going 400 mph. You think some sand crab from a mud hut in Afghanistan who has only taken simulation flights and never actually flown a giant passenger plane, is going to be able to perfectly maneuver this giant plane 40 ft off the ground and make a direct hit on a flat building? Also, where is all of the camera footage of the Pentagon strike? We have that one clip where you see a flash go by and explosion and THATS IT. The Pentagon, probably the most surveiled building on the planet, only has a single video of the crash? No Bank cameras, no store cameras, no pole cameras, nothing. Do you honestly believe they don't have ANY of footage of that strike? So, why wouldn't they show us any of those videos?
I still recon it was all planned by the government mostly because of so many movies and episodes that predicted it years before it even happened! (That simpsons episode for starters) and certain famous people even gave strange hints about it years before it happened too!
George Carlin had an album coming out a few days after 911. In it, he talked about it happening before it happened. They didn't release it, and nobody has heard it.
I realize that from certain angles, when you see the second plane approaching the south tower, it looks like a very steep decent. However, from other views that appear to be more panoramic, it does not look like there was a lack of control/late maneuvering of the jet into the tower. It looks deliberate. The place it makes impact makes sense, considering that the goal was to knock the tower(s) over.
I would love a video about what happened to the people inside the elevators during the impact of the planes. And if they all go stuck inside them till the collapses and such.
Some made it out. There is a very well known story featured in the documentary inside the twin towers that talks about a janitor who used the handle of his squeegee to dig himself and a few others through the wall and out of an elevator stuck on the 50ish floor. Another case a man in the north tower I believe it was was freed from an elevator but didn’t end up making it out of the building
Yes there is a movie called 911 with Charlie sheen and Whoopi Goldberg and also there are stories that can confirm that and also one firefighter made it to one of the impact zones unfortunately he died when the tower collapsed he probably had seen numerous people dead and badly injured people
There is an eyewitness account of a British chap, lawyer working on the higher floors during the attack. When he made it to the 78th floor skylobby he noted they were elevator doors open, burnt out and they weren’t empty. Another eyewitness explained he was on the 78th floor skylobby when the plane hit. A colleague of his was in another elevator and escaped with seconds to spare. She was the third out. The first chap was mildly burned, the second chap very burned and his colleague severely burned as they tried to exit. The rest inside perished she was the last out. Burning debris and gallons of aviation fuel poured down many of the shafts. Must of been horrific.
Idk the names of different videos, but if you watch one of the south impact angles that were up close facing west (so the side you see the whole fireball), you hear 3 quick, but distinct, metallic “bangs”, almost like hearing a baseball get hit with a metal bat. I believe it’s the impact on the south face, then blowing out the east fact, and then blowing out the north face a split second letter. Either that or the echos bouncing off other buildings. It’s one of the things I always notice when watching back different 9/11 docs is how despite hearing the exact same plane crash, it sounds DRASTICALLY different from different angles and distances.
Your into something, because it definitely sounds almost like 3 explosions when the plane goes into the South tower, so it's possible this interview was right after the South tower was hit.
@@teijaflink2226 I’ve always just found it striking how when you watch the south tower “every angle” compilations how different the exact same impact sounds in every clip. So when I watched this it was my first thought
@@teijaflink2226If you watch the video when the second plane hits and the ca,era is on the backside where the plane exits.. if you look at the North tower split seconds before the other impact you’ll see smoke on many floors all suck in and puff back out. It’s weird
@@Dr_GraysGhost_420 I noticed that too and fell into a wormhole a couple years ago trying to find out why but couldn’t find anyone else ever even mention it. I think it’s a pressure wave or something but I’m no science doctor so I could be full of shit
I saw a video that showed gases in the floors of every floor that could be set off in an order if they needed to demo the buildings instead of having them burn for weeks.
Yeah, SO many people interviewed on 9/11 that were right outside, or inside, the north tower said they heard an explosion right after flight 11 hit the north tower. So I would assume that's one of the explosions the fire fighters heard. I do think the fireball with the elevators happened right after because so many people said it happened back to back. There was SO much chaos that day, obviously, and people just didn't know how to make sense out of what they heard in the moment. I like your video explaining why the towers fell. They were thorough and made a lot of sense. South tower falling at an angle from being hit at angle. And the north tower falling because the building was compromised from the South tower falling. Side note: a remote control controlling a huge plane makes absolutely no sense. It's just hard for people to come to grips with the tragedy that day.
Two issues with the 'fireball' theory, one; fire doesn't go down, heat rises. It's not Hollywood. Two; none of the elevator shafts ran the entire length of the building. As for remote co trolley, unlikely but possible. However, an experienced commercial pilot I know (ex Concorde pilot and a captain of rhe fleet) said in his opinion it was impossible to manoeuvre the second plane in that manner at that speed, and he believed laser guidance was the only way
@@HarryF-tz5fo the planes going 500 mph were claims, drag amd air resistance in general would make the difficilt to do, but then at the same time flight 175 was going in a steep pitch at ALMOST full power in the thrust, they were most likely going 250-400 mph
@@gjustg1540 well it was obviously difficult for UAL 175 to hit the tower at high speeds but it was most likely only going 300-400 mph, and it also explains why it was so sloppy, it was at a 35 degree roll and almost missed the tower and impacting at its side which also explains the top portion of the building falling fowards and leaning
@@gjustg1540actually there were elevators shafts that ran the entire height. The top floors had dedicated elevators, “express” so people didn’t have to go to one sky lobby, get on another elevator, go to the next sky lobby, then get on an elevator to your floor.
Explosions could be fire extinguishers, or mechanical system pressure vessels being cooked. I agree IMHO the collapse was caused by the tower's open design and lack of redundant collums in the open spaces. Its a good design but doesn't account large fully fueled aircraft and explosive devices. I'm not a conspiracy absolutist.
I highly doubt massive explosions that blew people throughout the lobby were from a fire extinguisher, or even other floors collapsing, I spoke with someone that worked in the lobby and seen several explosions come from inside of the walls and under the floor
@@bigmike_420_9 Its hard to know and you could be right. I remember hearing of elevator's door opening and people running out on fire. IDK 9/11 was so weird and the years after sucked so much (even now). The pentagon and wtc7 add to this. I was in the south tower 102 floor indoor deck as a child.. I remember the neon lights and the dimpled rubber floors by the window, and the view.
@@philhoward4466 Also its claimed that the aircraft crash knocked the sprayed on fire protection off the structural components allegedly speeding they're failure
Sound waves easily travelled through the structure of those buildings a likely cause was the floors involved in the impact zone was failing and that could be heard as a deep rumble throughout the steel structure, if you were inside absolutely that would have been interpreted as an explosion
@DepressedGinger can you do a video on the theory that the plane fuselage’s debris melting & causing molten Aluminum + Water explosions which assisted in the collapse of the Twin Towers. There is a documentary done by the Smithsonian channel which goes into detail about this theory, it’s pretty interesting.
@@iananderson8363 you have a valid opinion regarding molten aluminum explosions resulting from the aluminum coming into contact with the rusty steel, however the theory I’m talking about doesn’t just apply to water itself (such as from the sprinklers, spilled water jugs, etc.). There was many possible water sources from the concrete, particleboard material desks, etc. that could have lead to the molten aluminum explosions.
What could have caused multiple explosions? Survivors say that they also heard massive explosions in the mall area under the towers. At first, I thought it was possibly the elevators falling, but falling elevators are a myth. The elevators are designed with independent braking systems that would not allow the elevators to fall. So, what were these explosions that were heard in strange parts of the buildings? Also, if you look really closely at the buildings after they are hit, you can see explosions going off in the windows all the way down. You see flashes and then the windows shatter. My theory is that a plane never hit these buildings. People just thought they saw a plane, because thats what they were told to see. With ALL of the security cameras and pole cameras in New York, where us all the footage from those cameras? We only have one supposed short clip of the first plane hitting the towers and that's it. There is absolutely no other footage of that first plane hitting the towers. By 2001 there were camera EVERYWHERE. What about all the cameras in the buildings? The internet was widely available by 2001, so any footage would have survived through a 2001 version of icloud. What about Bank cameras or the cameras in the Marriott? There are literally thousands of clips of that first plane hitting and it's being kept from the public. It's also not possible for fire balls to have traveled down the elevator shafts to the floor level, because the elevators are staggered and not straight to the ground. The fire balls would have stopped when they hit their ground level which was still 70 floors up. There should have been zero explosions in the lobby or especially the mall. There is no connection between the impact zone and the lobby.
I think you will be interested to learn about the power shutdown down in The North Tower on the weekend leading up to 911. It was related supposedly to installation updating. There was no security and half of the Towers were empty do to many companies having to move do to months of renovations in various floors as well as some companies just moving to another location prior.
That day nobody knew what was going on! You can even see when people were interviewed on the street, people standing next to one another and saw the same thing and you can see them say it was a jet, no it was something else. They couldn't even agree on what they saw.
Not even true. Majority of those who said out loud what they saw where specific enough to boiled it down to an "airliner" and many even got the type almost right, guessing on a 737, when it was a 757 and 767. Considering that your regular Joe is anything but an aviation expert, the fact that they all still came to the independent conclusion that it was a "large jet airliner" speaks for itself. People knew very much what they saw. You guys need to drop the tinfoil hats and come back to reality.
When the south tower collapsed you see the top fall over. I’m sure there were people alive in some of the floors in that huge section that fell. I can’t imagine how it must have felt to be in one of those floors at that moment
There’s a 911 recording of a dispatcher talking to someone trapped on like 86th(ish) floor as the south tower collapses on them. It’s one of the most haunting things I’ve ever heard. I can’t remember the dudes name but it should come up easily on google. Before the 911 call he managed to call and get through to CNN I think as well
@@sullymusic4186 Wonder if you're thinking of Kevin Cosgrove. He was on the 105th floor in an office with a bunch of people and was on the line with 911 all the way upto the collapse. Pretty awful call to listen to.
@@peteroni21 there was also a police who signed his retirement papers before everything started happening but helped anyways, unfortunately things didn't end well for him.
I saw a video recently called The Day Before 9/11, I tried putting a link of it up before and someone took it down. But man I’m sure with everything burning in the building there are going to be all kinds of explosions pipes, electrical equipment etc.. imo
I’ll trust eyewitnesses and thousands of professional architects and engineers over the government telling them they don’t know what they’re talking about.
I mean, you hear the jumpers of course - though the audio in the final made-for-broadcast version of the documentary is heavily mastered. In the unmastered "not for broadcast" version things like the impacts don't stick out as much.
From my understanding the molten steel was all miniscule small spatter/dust on the ground. One theory is that it was from the cutting torches used in the rescue and removal operations. Personally I believe the theory that it was from the fire given the size of the particles found. Even a simple wood fire will heat steel enough that small pieces of surface oxidation will melt and fall off in the form of super tiny molten droplets of steel the size of dust. It's not much under normal situations but given the size of the building and how long it was on fire there would be a lot of that kind of tiny molten droplets. We saw reinforced concrete, glass, insulation, furniture, office equipment, and bodies all turn into a fine dust that spread across the city so certainly there was plenty of steel dust ground off in the collapse and melted by the fires that kept going for days.
Vapor fumes from fully loaded airplanes could have exploded when contained within trapped spaces & ignited from heat & flames. Various sounds of floors, electronic components, cracks, any number of things combined with the utter chaos could very well have been heard as explosions.
The holes up top were required. Regardless how they got there. Wagging the dog. . Fact is the holes above were necessary as vents to channel the underground nukes blast pressure wave to be channeled up the elevator shafts. . The 150kt charges were buried 70 meters deep in granite below each tower. Just enough to allow underground blast to just peak throu the surface under each tower. The other explosions your video sort of acknowledged were clearing / connecting the elevator shafts allowing the pulverizing of 800 ' and the crushing then breaking of the top 300' as the blast ran up through it. Broken atoms turn to dust. All in the demolition plan required and submitted with the blueprints to obtain building permits 1960s. Then they did it. The plane story true or not is the shock and awe of this " secret terror attack " . It has allowed the deepstate to terrorize the world for decades with bllchit boogieman. Terrorism. Fact. Without those vents above the buildings would have blown outward. Actually a little did up top in the crushed zone. The pulverize zone was the dust. 99% of radiation and most recognizable signs stays underground. I know, they test 1000 near me. Fact Note: the tunnels were all dug in at construction 60s. Devices were rolled in that day. You weren't sitting on a powder keg. Lol
I know what im about to ask might be a difficult topic but since I love your videos analysis, but is it possible that youll be able to talk about the jumpers?
Did you ever hear of the photographer that took many photos of the jumpers? For those who don't, he actually contacted families of employees in the building and shared photos with them. He did find closure for a bunch whose family members were in fact some of the jumpers.
The floors collapsing can sound like an explosion. So did the sounds of bodies hitting the ground and awnings. The floors were huge. And they were heavy. 60ft long steel truss topped with concrete, plus whatever contents were on those floors. During the fires, you can sometimes hear explosion like sounds accompanied by puffs of smoke coming from the buildings. Especially seen just before the collapse of the north tower. No bombs. No conspiracy. The buildings collapsed due to loss of structural integrity caused by the plane impact and resulting fires which weakened the buildings further. It's amazing that the buildings stayed up as long as they did.
Lots of short sellers of airline stocks in the weeks right before and that is a proven fact. Shorts were almost 5X the normal amount. It was an indeed job or lots of people knew it was going to happen.
The two French documentary makers, who captured the first plane strike. State that when they arrive at the North tower and first go into the building. Two women emerge from an elevator on fire. They don't film the women, but aim the camera away from them. Though you can hear their screams. I don't know how long it took them to get to the tower from where they are testing for a gas leak and first hear the jet go overhead. Probably no more than 5 to 10 minutes. Some of the elevators jammed when the towers twisted under impact. Others plunged nearly the length of the towers, before the safety brakes halted their plunge to the ground. In that same documentary, one of the brothers tells how none of the lifts had been working for some time, when after they had been there nearly half an hour, these lift doors open and about 10 totally confused people get out, having no idea what is going on. They had been trapped since the crash. Had avoided getting incinerated by burning fuel pouring down the shaft, and then the lift suddenly starts working, takes them to the ground floor, the doors open to the lobby full of hundreds of firemen.
yeah, i have this documentary on file (not sure if you can get it today such easily as me), it was first responders on site and maybe only working camera crew, that scene with burners explained like was a kerosine fuel from airplane itself
You could well be right, and you make some fair points but there are legitimate reasons as to why people think this was a demolition job. WTC 7 for example was definitely a demolition when you watch it - I don't see how anyone can say different. Then you've got multiple reporters, not just firefighters saying they heard explosions. Think about it - The Mechanical Equipment rooms could easily have been used to plant them. Why did Grenfell Tower in London stay standing when the whole thing was on fire, not just a part of it.
I was listening to this while cleaning and saw it was about to end - I was like wait, what?! I thought for sure you were going to play/add commentary on top of the video you’re referencing. Now I’m running to try to watch it to see what you’re talking about!😅
It's scary to imagine what could've happened if flight 175 only clipped the south tower with a wing. The south tower probably wouldn't have taken enough damage to collapse but there still would've been the issue of the plane either falling into another nearby building or landing in the street killing countless bystanders. Depending on where the plane would've landed, it also could've led to an extreme chain reaction car wreck. Even if 175 didn't turn enough at the last second to successfully hit the intended target, at that point it was still guaranteed to do some major damage somewhere else.
The heard "explosions" could have been so many things. Could have even been tires exploding on cars that were burnt out by falling debris - which happened to dozens and dozens of vehicles that day. You see that in the news footage exploring building 7 just prior to its collapse, parked outside are tons if burnt out vehicles and some still burning - it looked like the Highway of Death. So many things that could have been.
El tema del colapso es que cayó en caída libre y además de haber caído x derretimiento del piso colapsado, x ley física la cantidad de pisos caídos hubieran sido sostenido por igual cantidad abajo …. No hubiese caído de forma libre. Acá se ve que más allá del colapso de los pisos quemados algo le quitó los cimientos. Una caída x arrastre (suponiendo que los 110 pisos se hubieran arrastrado unos tras otros) jamás habrían caído en 8 segundos
Ni hablar del edificio 7 🤐 ese no tenía una sola columna interna como menciona el video …. Hay cosas que no cierran, x algo nunca se terminó de creer la versión oficial.
Israeli art students lived in the tower for a year with access to every part of the buildings foe a full year Luckily the owner Gor twice as much as the towers were worth How many people would you sacrifice for $3billion?
But all of this is irrelevant. The collapse started from the top down. And then when the collapse was happening - 100+ floors pancaking what would you hear? I love your videos sir but please dont run down rabbit holes.
Speaking of explosion, take a closer look at the first plane's impact. You'll see an explosion at 2 different areas on the floor where the restaurant was. But how could that be if the aircraft struck about 15 floors below? Well, the kitchen's stoves & ovens were gas, not electric. The impact severed a the gas main running up to that floor. No one ever talks about that.
I wish you would put a little more work into your productions. Like, when you start talking about specific stuff, then show a picture of the thing or person you're talking about. Use arrows, lines and circles if needed. Your content is great, but having the same 6-10 pictures running through a diashow while you're talking seems a bit low effort.
The trusses, that held the floors up, melted due to the intense heat causing weight of the floors to collapse like a stack of pancakes on top of each other, like dominos except it was top to bottom.
Both airliners were fuel filled for long flights. These long flights were purposely chosen by the hijacker's to cause more damage than just the impact by having a prolonged fuel fire within both buildings. The fires where concentrated in both buildings and subsequently weakened the steel structure, which led to the collapses do to weight of the upper floors of both buildings.
The planes had, not very much fuel onboard. Also the fuel burnt direct. Just for a short moment. Flight 11 38.000 Liter. Flight 175 34.000 liter. That isnt much.
I will never understand all the conspiracies. No people on the planes? There are eye witnesses of bodies still buckled into plane seats that had blown out the other side of the building and landed on the ground below. Remote controlled planes? The improbability of the logistics of that aside, people on the planes called their loved ones and I believe I read at least one was talking on the phone at the moment of impact. The plane couldn't bring down the building? The plane didn't bring it down, the fire did. And no thermite was required to melt the steel either. Steel loses stength the hotter it gets in a normal fire. Try heating an iron bar with a simple plumbers torch and you can practically bend it with one finger. I've personally witnessed the aftermath of a middle school fire where a 12" I-beam in the roof got so hot that it sagged half way to the floor below under it's own weight nearly pulling over the block wall it was attached to. Firefighters on 9/11 reported sagging girders and in some video clips you can see what appears to be multiple floors near the impact sight that have dropped/sagged onto the floors below as the fire rages on. The open concept of the towers utilized a central core {which was seriously damaged by the planes} as well as utilizing the outside of the building as the main structure of the building. A system of brackets tied each floor to the outer structural columns of the building. As the heat of the fire weakened the floors they sagged and bowed downwards under their own weight. As this happened it translated into a force pulling inwards on the outer columns of the building, also weakened by fire. Eventually causing the outer structure of the building to buckle inwards. This can clearly be seen in the videos of the collapse. It's fairly basic physics with no special secret government demolition teams needed. The conspiracies all ignore actual evidence in favor of hearsay as well. I've even heard people claim the planes and the collapse was all done in CGI for the TV. A conspiracy that somehow ignores the millions of live eye witnesses in New York that day. As for the government involvement there's no way of knowing with 100% certainty. However the simplest answer is usually correct. And that is that terrorist attacked us and the government simply capitalized on the opportunity. As the saying goes "Never let a good crisis go to waste". Politicians in particular do that on a daily basis so it wouldn't be surprising if the did it after a large disaster. Plus why would 4 planes have been needed to justify going to war anyway? Simply the twin towers would've been enough even if they hadn't collapsed. And why attack the pantagon? No military would intentionally attack their own base of operations. Especially if they had plans to go to war immediately following.
They’d have never flown in that low as what would’ve been the point? They clearly wanted to trap people. I’m surprised they didn’t fly in a bit lower though say 50 stories up.
C-4 charges detonating can be heard miles away. Of the many videos of the towers collapsing from a mile away, you don't hear any detonations. But, if you ever watch a video of a controlled demolition, you will hear the charges detonating, and it's very loud.
I personally saw that video interview of those firefighters stating they themselves heard explosions & I swear one of them said.pop, pop, pop as each floor collapsed that there was a separate explosion. I have since tried to find that video again over the years & never could. Did I actually hear those firefighters correctly? I've wanted to re-watch it just to see if my memory was correct. By the way every one of those firefighters is now dead.. THAT RIGHT THERE & the fact TH-cam has removed the original video tells me a lot. I dont understand why many of the steel beams in the aftermath were shorn off at angles. Nor do I understand why those shorn off beams were quickly carted away sold off for scrap before a clear investigation could be done. I dont understand why the day before Donald Rumsfield announced that the government accidentally just happened to loose $2.3 trillion US dollars. I don't understand how building 7 accidentally fell WITHOUT being hit by a plane...and OH, apparently the records & documents regarding the missing trillions were stored in that building 7. I dont understand why there was no wings or tail of the jet that hit the pentagon. I've seen other horrible plane crashes where the plane itself is obliterated, seats, bodies, luggage, clothing, and airplane parts are strewn all over the ground...but we are told flight 93 just disintegrated right into the ground? No wreckage? No seats, bodies, luggage clothing, wings, engines,...nothing? How about the months of sifting thru the rubble to find bodies but miraculously we just so happened to find the wallets for the terrorists themselves almost immediately. You all believe what you want....I'm not buying it.
Explosions were heard well before the collapse and the lobby of the north tower exploded. The theory of the ball of fire that came down to the lobby via the elevator or the stairs is ridiculous and impossible. People were stuck in the elevators when the plane hit and managed to reach the lobby after security or firefighters restarted it. We see it in the Naudet brothers’ video.
You dont want to lose integrity. Your content is pretty solid. We all seen thousands of videos of 9/11. Interviews etc. Planes were real..etc. Put the blame on the ones who caused this..
I think with multiple explosions they meant the floors falling on each other, so I think they where talking right after the South tower fell. Anyway thank you for looking into different things (even conspiracies) but talking sence and trying to find facts and then you actually know about engineeering which many people don't know. And I have definitely seen too that people who say it's impossible that the planes took them down never mention the unique interior but still they make it sound like they are experts.
Many explosions happened. But not planted explosives. The fireball reached several levels and even the parking deck. Many cars were on fire, so each time a gas tank was ruptured, another explosion. Small fires on a few floors also happened below the impact zone, either from the fireball, or from debris from other tower. The famous line where the firefighter said only one or two lines to put out a fire, I believe was from one of the smaller fires on a lower level. It is possible one of the smaller fires also compromised something that could combust on another floor. It would even be likely that somewhere in 220 floors of 1 acre each, that there would be renovations on some floor that require some gasoline powered device and there would be a few 5 gallon jugs of gasoline somewhere in those towers.
The people in the basement who thought that there was an explosion there but it was a few different things or 1 of these few thing. The elevator dropping and hitting the floor or the blast of the egnighted jetfuel blowing out the doors like in the lobby. Could have been floors collapsing and also things may have exploded, super heated fire extinguishers, trans formers, anything with gas in it, like a propane tank. Bodies hitting the ground also sounded like explosions. Also, people were calling EVERYTHING that day, an explosion. When the building collapsed so many people on film, on news broadcasts were saying "oh look, a third explosion."
I’ve heard his story and brian Clark’s told by them 5-6 different times. They are pretty consistent. What parts don’t add up. Their stories are pretty consistent and plausible regardless if they are lying or exaggerating
The explosions could probably just be some gas lines or some electrical devices, fire extinguishers floors falling and cracking, could be glass or stuff falling or something else. It most likely was not a planted explosion. Interesting conspiracy
make a video on Mohamed atta and Marwan Al-Shehhi being together. their plannings, and their visit to a bar where they drank orange juice and atta was playing video games on an arcade.
There was still tons of melting and burning aircraft aluminum inside the buildings, this came in contact with water from the still working sprinkler system. What happens if melting aluminum comes into contact with water? It explodes!
you should do a video on a theory. if any of the kitchen staff of windows of the world went into any of the walk-in freezers to escape the smoke and fire and how long would that survived if building's didn't come down.
As much as I hate to say this, but the impacts and the damage that was shown on the news and various videos since, I'm really not surprised they fell. whilst I can't confirm which towers each close up was made at, you clearly saw virtually the whole side of where the planes had impacted being taken out, you also saw on at least one corner area being taken out also.
Also, I have nothing but respect for the Firefighters that day that sacrificed everything but, are we to believe that Firefighters are subject matter experts when it comes to bombs and explosives? Well they are not. Sure, they may know a little more than the average civilian but they dont go through any special training that would give them the knowledge of deciphering the difference between explosives and other loud noises that occur when planes traveling between 400mph & 500mph crash into two different 110 story buildings.
Kerosene needs some sort of wick to burn really. I don't see what wick material there would be in lift shafts as lift shafts are usually steel and concrete. I watched the second tower get hit and then the two towers collapse live as it was happening on tv here in England UK. I'm pretty sure those towers were demolished by explosives. The towers were built to withstand aircraft flying into them. I understand that high up in the air like that with a breeze the fire could get up to quite a high temperature, but the integrity of the steel below the areas the towers were hit would have remained. We were being lied to back then, and we are being lied to all the time now about almost everything by our western leaders. The US government and indeed the UK government are criminal organisations and have been for a very long time.
When kersosene is vaporized in a mist it will burn very well and cause explosions. That could be caused by the impact itself, but also when the fuel just fell down the elevator shafts and splash around.
They could withstand impact, which they did. But extreme heat burning through shattered floors, that was not in the list of things that could/would happen when they were built in the 70's.
@@Fragmented1436 Well, they actually did envision an airplane hitting the tower in an accident since it happened to the Empire State in the 40s. But not a fully fueled up 767. The biggest plane they expected was a 707.
Can someone please explain the logic to me of going through the trouble of learning how to fly planes, hijacking 4 aircraft almost simultaneously, and then killing yourself if you were just going to blow the buildings up with explosives anyway? Like what would be the point of hijacking planes & crashing them into the buildings if you could just blow them up with explosives?
Sometimes I wonder, what was left of the plane when it was burning inside the building. Was it still recognizable? Did it still look like a 767? If the tower never fell, and the plane was taken out of the tower, would it still be in one piece? I have so many questions.
From what I understand it mostly disintegrated some small parts were thrown like wheels or tiny pieces of the engine but for the most part there was nothing left of it
When we wonder things like this, I think it’s difficult for us to truly imagine how brutal the reality was because we only saw it in exterior distance shots for the most part
The planes broke up into pieces of different sizes. We know this because parts were found outside of the towers: wheels and an engine were found and photographed outside the towers. There is video of the South Tower which is zoomed in on burning floors and part of the body of the plane is recognizable leaning outside the outer edge of the building. The paint colors can clearly be seen once one visually picks it out from the exterior skin. If the towers didn't fall, the recovery effort would have included cutting apart any plane parts which were too large to safely be removed by crane. The plane which hit in the center of the North Tower would have left fewer large parts as it collided directly with the central column and crumpled, split, and/or shredded. The South Tower plane hung out the side because of the angle it went in at.
How much more content can this guys give us??
His obsession is another man's content!
LOVE THIS CHANNEL!
LOVE THE VOICE!
Wait a minute, he plagerizes??? You dont say! Lol
These are his conspiracies on the event. These videos and his beliefs are irrelevant.
I know his voice gives me such a New Yorker vibe 🔥
@@christopherniceley8848His theories are only irrelevant if you have no interest in 9/11. What is the conspiracy?
@@brianspece8951he’s from Ohio
Cover the original 93 bombing memorial next.
Forgotten bit of history.
Se recuperó un pequeño fragmente del memorial del bombardeo, solo es una parte del círculo principal
@@LNRD_2909 ENGLISH!!!!!!
Not forgotten, just overshadowed.
@@Bibiboshperhaps this person is commenting from a Spanish-speaking country.
@@Bibibosh How about you learn how to click the translation link that is right underneath every comment written in other languages? It's not that difficult.
between the time that each tower was hit and when it came down, there were multiple floors collapsing, causing "explosion" sounds. You can see videos and photos of the impact zones, where portions of the floors had already collapsed, and floors/ceilings were literally hanging off where they disconnected from the outer walls. You can also see, in various videos of seconds prior to the towers coming down, that floors were collapsing and debris was shooting out of the remaining windows on the top floors. This seems like a pretty legitimate reason for people to claim they heard "explosion"-type noises.
What I find strange is why is most of the lobby floor visible as soon as the dust settled, I thought the building's fell straight down all 110 floors of each tower, yet hardly any rubble and you can see clearly the majority of the lobby floor, how is that possible?
@@liampendragon9448huh?
You can also listen to 3000 architects and engineers that have stood steadfast against the story we were told. Their knowledge of structural engineering says otherwise. Building have never collapsed prior to 9/11 or post 9/11 from fire or otherwise, only the WTC 1 & 2, oh and #7 that wasn’t hit by anything 7 Hours later, and we were told they “Pulled it” Explain that?
@@liampendragon9448 there are too many damn weird things about that day! Where did the buildings go, the piles of debris should have been giant, yet they weren’t. You can see in the videos even though they have edited a lot of them, that the Steel portions turn into Dust and the dust falls. Also, the building wouldn’t have fallen free fall unless there was no resistance at all, which would mean all of the floors below would have to be gone for free fall. But the story of a pancake collapse doesn’t work for free fall.
It’s very possible that multiple floors calling on top of each other before the full collapse could have sounded like an explosion.
yes floors collapsing on top of eachother 100% can sound like that and you have to remember too that when fire heats anything up enough, it will explode. Who knows how many things that had the potential to explode that was inside the building. Heck if you throw a can of WD-40 into a campfire it will explode up in a mushroom cloud like a bomb
It is very possible. There were some people in the south tower trapped in the 100s that said in their phone calls to 911 that floors below them in the 90s were collapsing. Those calls were all before the collapse at 9:59
There was massive fires.
You mean falling
Same thing I am thinking
No one seems to talk about this, but i remember watching a video before 9/11 which was a documentary on thw towers being built. There was a small segment towards the end that talked about how they would handle thier demolition in the future when i became time to bring them down. They talked about how certain areas of the core had to be pre-wired for such as once built it would be to difficult to reach the areas where they would need to. I have been searching for that video since, but it seems to have been removed from youtube. Anyone else remember that video?
No, but research Ace Elevators.
this small mysterious company was recently awarded the WTC contract, and they all immediately fled like cowards, leaving innocent people to burn to death and got maby good firefighters killed bc they were caught up trying to help people trapped in them abd had to retrieve a specific tool to manually open the doors since all of the mechanics scurried immediately like rats.
The elevator theory is highly unlikely. As an elevator mechanic, the elevator cab itself is equipped with 8 steel cables. One cable alone is enough to hoist the cab. Plus you have a governor cable that's separate from the 8 hoist cables. The governor is a flywheel mechanism that'll lock the cable, stopping the cab if goes into free fall.
The total story doesnt end up.
People are not very smart in this topic in my opinion.
Me myself, I think the original story is total BS.
@@TDH8988 Exactly
When people talk about 9/11 their IQ automatically drops 😂
How hard would it be to get to the core columns if they were doing "elevator service" weeks prior to 9/11?
@@chappyg5512 Great question. It's very easy. Go to the top level of the building. Program the control panel inside the cab. Leave the cab and key the cab down from the outside. Walk on top of the cab in the shaft. You'll find a controller on top of the cab for up, down, stop manually. So yeah it's very easy to rig columns because they're a part of the entire shaft for it's integrity. Because you have not only the cab weighing 5,000 lbs, plus there's a counterweight that weigh 7,500 lbs as well
The very very strange thing about this horrible event, all building falls perfectly straight down. And also wtc 7 building fall perfectly down only because of fire they mentioned afterwards. I also have seen that video and they all confirmed that there where explosions (they are professionals). There are so many strange things that happened that horrible day. Keep up the good hard work and hopefully we get more pictures and videos from you to see about this terrible event.
The reason why those buildings collapsed on themselves is because of the way they were engineered including the materials used. Only plain brick and concrete structures fall sideways. Lastly the so-called explosions heard from inside is to do with what happens when burning fuel combined with Aluminium and water from the sprinklers react together.
@@PSYCHIC_PSYCHO that’s indeed true also I saw one video from a firefighter who mentioned that these floors are really unstable and unsave to walk on. But nevertheless there are some many other strange things happening that day. Also on the stock exchange that day (inside information)? I really don’t know.
Also this video released only 2 years ago! th-cam.com/video/o6t31R4tI10/w-d-xo.htmlsi=Ai5ZpaYPCBP2AiFY
Exactly on the date that Russia invaded Ukraine …coincidence?
Still the worst part is…the people who had died that day🙏god bless them all🙏
@@StripesNoCommentary Thanks for the link, but I watched that video yesterday. It was a most audacious and spectacular assault on a country in history, I can't imagine it ever being topped by any terrorist in the future.
Also, let's focus more on the Pentagon strike. Look at how perfectly this plane is flying level with the ground and going 400 mph. You think some sand crab from a mud hut in Afghanistan who has only taken simulation flights and never actually flown a giant passenger plane, is going to be able to perfectly maneuver this giant plane 40 ft off the ground and make a direct hit on a flat building?
Also, where is all of the camera footage of the Pentagon strike? We have that one clip where you see a flash go by and explosion and THATS IT. The Pentagon, probably the most surveiled building on the planet, only has a single video of the crash?
No Bank cameras, no store cameras, no pole cameras, nothing. Do you honestly believe they don't have ANY of footage of that strike? So, why wouldn't they show us any of those videos?
I still recon it was all planned by the government mostly because of so many movies and episodes that predicted it years before it even happened! (That simpsons episode for starters) and certain famous people even gave strange hints about it years before it happened too!
Fr
Yawn
George Carlin had an album coming out a few days after 911. In it, he talked about it happening before it happened. They didn't release it, and nobody has heard it.
@@critterfestsanctuary2446 his daughter put it out. You can purchase it
I realize that from certain angles, when you see the second plane approaching the south tower, it looks like a very steep decent. However, from other views that appear to be more panoramic, it does not look like there was a lack of control/late maneuvering of the jet into the tower. It looks deliberate. The place it makes impact makes sense, considering that the goal was to knock the tower(s) over.
Oh i dont think they wanted or think it was possible to knock them down. They were suprised i think , that it went down. The planners
Flight 11 was also in a descent when it struck the North Tower, it wasn't as drastic like United 175 though
I would love a video about what happened to the people inside the elevators during the impact of the planes. And if they all go stuck inside them till the collapses and such.
Some made it out. There is a very well known story featured in the documentary inside the twin towers that talks about a janitor who used the handle of his squeegee to dig himself and a few others through the wall and out of an elevator stuck on the 50ish floor. Another case a man in the north tower I believe it was was freed from an elevator but didn’t end up making it out of the building
Yes there is a movie called 911 with Charlie sheen and Whoopi Goldberg and also there are stories that can confirm that and also one firefighter made it to one of the impact zones unfortunately he died when the tower collapsed he probably had seen numerous people dead and badly injured people
Look at the documentary inside the twin towers. Also the documentary a tale of two towers. Also the movie 911 with Charlie sheen and whoopi goldberg.
There is an eyewitness account of a British chap, lawyer working on the higher floors during the attack. When he made it to the 78th floor skylobby he noted they were elevator doors open, burnt out and they weren’t empty. Another eyewitness explained he was on the 78th floor skylobby when the plane hit. A colleague of his was in another elevator and escaped with seconds to spare. She was the third out. The first chap was mildly burned, the second chap very burned and his colleague severely burned as they tried to exit. The rest inside perished she was the last out. Burning debris and gallons of aviation fuel poured down many of the shafts. Must of been horrific.
I think the cables would of been severed by the plane…….not all of them….
Pressure can cause explosions.
Then again, im no firefighter, and completely respect they're opinions of what the saw and heard that day.
Idk the names of different videos, but if you watch one of the south impact angles that were up close facing west (so the side you see the whole fireball), you hear 3 quick, but distinct, metallic “bangs”, almost like hearing a baseball get hit with a metal bat.
I believe it’s the impact on the south face, then blowing out the east fact, and then blowing out the north face a split second letter. Either that or the echos bouncing off other buildings. It’s one of the things I always notice when watching back different 9/11 docs is how despite hearing the exact same plane crash, it sounds DRASTICALLY different from different angles and distances.
Your into something, because it definitely sounds almost like 3 explosions when the plane goes into the South tower, so it's possible this interview was right after the South tower was hit.
@@teijaflink2226 I’ve always just found it striking how when you watch the south tower “every angle” compilations how different the exact same impact sounds in every clip. So when I watched this it was my first thought
@@teijaflink2226If you watch the video when the second plane hits and the ca,era is on the backside where the plane exits.. if you look at the North tower split seconds before the other impact you’ll see smoke on many floors all suck in and puff back out. It’s weird
@@Dr_GraysGhost_420 I noticed that too and fell into a wormhole a couple years ago trying to find out why but couldn’t find anyone else ever even mention it. I think it’s a pressure wave or something but I’m no science doctor so I could be full of shit
We make shit up rather than admit we failed. It's just nicer for everybody that way.
Have you seen the Rugrats movie ad where the Twin Towers were renamed Phil and Lil? It just popped up in my suggestions yesterday.
Can you post the link of the video youre referring to? Otherwise without that to reference, its hars to follow wtf youre talking about bro
@@RichieD_21 "twin towers renamed phil and lil regrats movie ad" is the title
I saw a video that showed gases in the floors of every floor that could be set off in an order if they needed to demo the buildings instead of having them burn for weeks.
Yeah, SO many people interviewed on 9/11 that were right outside, or inside, the north tower said they heard an explosion right after flight 11 hit the north tower. So I would assume that's one of the explosions the fire fighters heard. I do think the fireball with the elevators happened right after because so many people said it happened back to back. There was SO much chaos that day, obviously, and people just didn't know how to make sense out of what they heard in the moment. I like your video explaining why the towers fell. They were thorough and made a lot of sense. South tower falling at an angle from being hit at angle. And the north tower falling because the building was compromised from the South tower falling. Side note: a remote control controlling a huge plane makes absolutely no sense. It's just hard for people to come to grips with the tragedy that day.
Two issues with the 'fireball' theory, one; fire doesn't go down, heat rises. It's not Hollywood. Two; none of the elevator shafts ran the entire length of the building. As for remote co trolley, unlikely but possible. However, an experienced commercial pilot I know (ex Concorde pilot and a captain of rhe fleet) said in his opinion it was impossible to manoeuvre the second plane in that manner at that speed, and he believed laser guidance was the only way
@@HarryF-tz5fo the planes going 500 mph were claims, drag amd air resistance in general would make the difficilt to do, but then at the same time flight 175 was going in a steep pitch at ALMOST full power in the thrust, they were most likely going 250-400 mph
@@gjustg1540 well it was obviously difficult for UAL 175 to hit the tower at high speeds but it was most likely only going 300-400 mph, and it also explains why it was so sloppy, it was at a 35 degree roll and almost missed the tower and impacting at its side which also explains the top portion of the building falling fowards and leaning
@@gjustg1540actually there were elevators shafts that ran the entire height. The top floors had dedicated elevators, “express” so people didn’t have to go to one sky lobby, get on another elevator, go to the next sky lobby, then get on an elevator to your floor.
@@gjustg1540 There were two express elevators that did run the entire length of the building
Explosions could be fire extinguishers, or mechanical system pressure vessels being cooked. I agree IMHO the collapse was caused by the tower's open design and lack of redundant collums in the open spaces. Its a good design but doesn't account large fully fueled aircraft and explosive devices. I'm not a conspiracy absolutist.
I highly doubt massive explosions that blew people throughout the lobby were from a fire extinguisher, or even other floors collapsing, I spoke with someone that worked in the lobby and seen several explosions come from inside of the walls and under the floor
@@bigmike_420_9 Its hard to know and you could be right. I remember hearing of elevator's door opening and people running out on fire. IDK 9/11 was so weird and the years after sucked so much (even now). The pentagon and wtc7 add to this. I was in the south tower 102 floor indoor deck as a child.. I remember the neon lights and the dimpled rubber floors by the window, and the view.
the design did not consider the possibility of such a hot and long fire from all that aircraft fuel.
@@philhoward4466 Also its claimed that the aircraft crash knocked the sprayed on fire protection off the structural components allegedly speeding they're failure
Sound waves easily travelled through the structure of those buildings a likely cause was the floors involved in the impact zone was failing and that could be heard as a deep rumble throughout the steel structure, if you were inside absolutely that would have been interpreted as an explosion
if an interior bean failed - it would "sound" like an explosion .... of course i wasn't there ....but it does make sense
@DepressedGinger can you do a video on the theory that the plane fuselage’s debris melting & causing molten Aluminum + Water explosions which assisted in the collapse of the Twin Towers. There is a documentary done by the Smithsonian channel which goes into detail about this theory, it’s pretty interesting.
controlled demolition , whole thing was planned
@@jaerockchalk3216 explain or forever hold your peace
Personally, I think it’s much more likely that molten aluminum came into contact with rusty steel and caused a reaction.
@@iananderson8363 you have a valid opinion regarding molten aluminum explosions resulting from the aluminum coming into contact with the rusty steel, however the theory I’m talking about doesn’t just apply to water itself (such as from the sprinklers, spilled water jugs, etc.). There was many possible water sources from the concrete, particleboard material desks, etc. that could have lead to the molten aluminum explosions.
@@Z0M81ERANGER interesting… I’m going to have to try and find that video. It sounds interesting.
For the amount of videos you make about this. It’s crazy you haven’t seen this interview of the firemen
What could have caused multiple explosions? Survivors say that they also heard massive explosions in the mall area under the towers. At first, I thought it was possibly the elevators falling, but falling elevators are a myth. The elevators are designed with independent braking systems that would not allow the elevators to fall.
So, what were these explosions that were heard in strange parts of the buildings? Also, if you look really closely at the buildings after they are hit, you can see explosions going off in the windows all the way down. You see flashes and then the windows shatter.
My theory is that a plane never hit these buildings. People just thought they saw a plane, because thats what they were told to see. With ALL of the security cameras and pole cameras in New York, where us all the footage from those cameras? We only have one supposed short clip of the first plane hitting the towers and that's it. There is absolutely no other footage of that first plane hitting the towers. By 2001 there were camera EVERYWHERE. What about all the cameras in the buildings? The internet was widely available by 2001, so any footage would have survived through a 2001 version of icloud. What about Bank cameras or the cameras in the Marriott? There are literally thousands of clips of that first plane hitting and it's being kept from the public.
It's also not possible for fire balls to have traveled down the elevator shafts to the floor level, because the elevators are staggered and not straight to the ground. The fire balls would have stopped when they hit their ground level which was still 70 floors up. There should have been zero explosions in the lobby or especially the mall. There is no connection between the impact zone and the lobby.
I think you will be interested to learn about the power shutdown down in The North Tower on the weekend leading up to 911. It was related supposedly to installation updating. There was no security and half of the Towers were empty do to many companies having to move do to months of renovations in various floors as well as some companies just moving to another location prior.
That day nobody knew what was going on! You can even see when people were interviewed on the street, people standing next to one another and saw the same thing and you can see them say it was a jet, no it was something else. They couldn't even agree on what they saw.
Not even true. Majority of those who said out loud what they saw where specific enough to boiled it down to an "airliner" and many even got the type almost right, guessing on a 737, when it was a 757 and 767. Considering that your regular Joe is anything but an aviation expert, the fact that they all still came to the independent conclusion that it was a "large jet airliner" speaks for itself.
People knew very much what they saw. You guys need to drop the tinfoil hats and come back to reality.
Love your channel, Great discussion
When the south tower collapsed you see the top fall over. I’m sure there were people alive in some of the floors in that huge section that fell. I can’t imagine how it must have felt to be in one of those floors at that moment
There’s a 911 recording of a dispatcher talking to someone trapped on like 86th(ish) floor as the south tower collapses on them. It’s one of the most haunting things I’ve ever heard. I can’t remember the dudes name but it should come up easily on google. Before the 911 call he managed to call and get through to CNN I think as well
@@sullymusic4186 Wonder if you're thinking of Kevin Cosgrove. He was on the 105th floor in an office with a bunch of people and was on the line with 911 all the way upto the collapse. Pretty awful call to listen to.
@@sullymusic4186Kevin Cosgrove
@@sullymusic4186 Kevin Cosgrove
@sullymusic4186 I think it was FDNY Chief Orio Palmer ?
I would love to see a video of you talking about some of the firefighter 9/11 documentaries
There was a NY firefighter whose first day on the job was 911
@@ibraheemrao8434”damn this is what being a firefighter is like? I quit!”
@@peteroni21 there was also a police who signed his retirement papers before everything started happening but helped anyways, unfortunately things didn't end well for him.
Love the content of your videos. Best wishes from Scotland.
I saw a video recently called The Day Before 9/11, I tried putting a link of it up before and someone took it down. But man I’m sure with everything burning in the building there are going to be all kinds of explosions pipes, electrical equipment etc.. imo
Petrol tanks were all over the buildings for generators. That was the explosions. Air gaps as well bursting here and there.
I’ll trust eyewitnesses and thousands of professional architects and engineers over the government telling them they don’t know what they’re talking about.
This is very interesting keep these series on 9/11 coming! Rip to all of the victims and God bless their families
god doesnt bless babylon
I love your work on this.
In the Naudet video, you hear absolutely nothing
But they're not in the north tower when it collapses. They were in the lobby of the north tower when the south tower collapsed, then they evacuate.
I mean, you hear the jumpers of course - though the audio in the final made-for-broadcast version of the documentary is heavily mastered. In the unmastered "not for broadcast" version things like the impacts don't stick out as much.
Wrong they were in the Marriott Hotel WTC3
@@melvynsngltn27 naudet brothers' video was taken on the north tower lobby
@@TodoHaTerminado he's talking about FDNY Firefighters James Grillo & Tyrone Johnson
What about the molten steel found at ground zero
From my understanding the molten steel was all miniscule small spatter/dust on the ground. One theory is that it was from the cutting torches used in the rescue and removal operations. Personally I believe the theory that it was from the fire given the size of the particles found. Even a simple wood fire will heat steel enough that small pieces of surface oxidation will melt and fall off in the form of super tiny molten droplets of steel the size of dust. It's not much under normal situations but given the size of the building and how long it was on fire there would be a lot of that kind of tiny molten droplets. We saw reinforced concrete, glass, insulation, furniture, office equipment, and bodies all turn into a fine dust that spread across the city so certainly there was plenty of steel dust ground off in the collapse and melted by the fires that kept going for days.
It could have been water reacting with molten aluminum.
Vapor fumes from fully loaded airplanes could have exploded when contained within trapped spaces & ignited from heat & flames. Various sounds of floors, electronic components, cracks, any number of things combined with the utter chaos could very well have been heard as explosions.
The holes up top were required. Regardless how they got there. Wagging the dog. . Fact is the holes above were necessary as vents to channel the underground nukes blast pressure wave to be channeled up the elevator shafts. . The 150kt charges were buried 70 meters deep in granite below each tower. Just enough to allow underground blast to just peak throu the surface under each tower. The other explosions your video sort of acknowledged were clearing / connecting the elevator shafts allowing the pulverizing of 800 ' and the crushing then breaking of the top 300' as the blast ran up through it. Broken atoms turn to dust. All in the demolition plan required and submitted with the blueprints to obtain building permits 1960s. Then they did it. The plane story true or not is the shock and awe of this " secret terror attack " . It has allowed the deepstate to terrorize the world for decades with bllchit boogieman. Terrorism. Fact. Without those vents above the buildings would have blown outward. Actually a little did up top in the crushed zone. The pulverize zone was the dust. 99% of radiation and most recognizable signs stays underground. I know, they test 1000 near me. Fact
Note: the tunnels were all dug in at construction 60s. Devices were rolled in that day. You weren't sitting on a powder keg. Lol
I know what im about to ask might be a difficult topic but since I love your videos analysis, but is it possible that youll be able to talk about the jumpers?
Did you ever hear of the photographer that took many photos of the jumpers? For those who don't, he actually contacted families of employees in the building and shared photos with them. He did find closure for a bunch whose family members were in fact some of the jumpers.
@@nugsymalone1247 Yeah I have! And I'm hoping they are doing alright after what happened that day.
The falling man docomentry. I have trouble finding it these days though.
@@peters2466 I watched it on TH-cam not too long ago.
8:01 i started getting an algorithm where im finding original videos from 13 years or older and no comments in about 7 years minimum
The floors collapsing can sound like an explosion. So did the sounds of bodies hitting the ground and awnings. The floors were huge. And they were heavy. 60ft long steel truss topped with concrete, plus whatever contents were on those floors. During the fires, you can sometimes hear explosion like sounds accompanied by puffs of smoke coming from the buildings. Especially seen just before the collapse of the north tower. No bombs. No conspiracy. The buildings collapsed due to loss of structural integrity caused by the plane impact and resulting fires which weakened the buildings further. It's amazing that the buildings stayed up as long as they did.
Lots of short sellers of airline stocks in the weeks right before and that is a proven fact. Shorts were almost 5X the normal amount. It was an indeed job or lots of people knew it was going to happen.
The two French documentary makers, who captured the first plane strike. State that when they arrive at the North tower and first go into the building. Two women emerge from an elevator on fire. They don't film the women, but aim the camera away from them. Though you can hear their screams. I don't know how long it took them to get to the tower from where they are testing for a gas leak and first hear the jet go overhead. Probably no more than 5 to 10 minutes. Some of the elevators jammed when the towers twisted under impact. Others plunged nearly the length of the towers, before the safety brakes halted their plunge to the ground. In that same documentary, one of the brothers tells how none of the lifts had been working for some time, when after they had been there nearly half an hour, these lift doors open and about 10 totally confused people get out, having no idea what is going on. They had been trapped since the crash. Had avoided getting incinerated by burning fuel pouring down the shaft, and then the lift suddenly starts working, takes them to the ground floor, the doors open to the lobby full of hundreds of firemen.
yeah, i have this documentary on file (not sure if you can get it today such easily as me), it was first responders on site and maybe only working camera crew, that scene with burners explained like was a kerosine fuel from airplane itself
You could well be right, and you make some fair points but there are legitimate reasons as to why people think this was a demolition job. WTC 7 for example was definitely a demolition when you watch it - I don't see how anyone can say different. Then you've got multiple reporters, not just firefighters saying they heard explosions. Think about it - The Mechanical Equipment rooms could easily have been used to plant them. Why did Grenfell Tower in London stay standing when the whole thing was on fire, not just a part of it.
I was listening to this while cleaning and saw it was about to end - I was like wait, what?! I thought for sure you were going to play/add commentary on top of the video you’re referencing. Now I’m running to try to watch it to see what you’re talking about!😅
i never watched. just reading comments. what is being said?
It's scary to imagine what could've happened if flight 175 only clipped the south tower with a wing. The south tower probably wouldn't have taken enough damage to collapse but there still would've been the issue of the plane either falling into another nearby building or landing in the street killing countless bystanders. Depending on where the plane would've landed, it also could've led to an extreme chain reaction car wreck. Even if 175 didn't turn enough at the last second to successfully hit the intended target, at that point it was still guaranteed to do some major damage somewhere else.
The heard "explosions" could have been so many things. Could have even been tires exploding on cars that were burnt out by falling debris - which happened to dozens and dozens of vehicles that day. You see that in the news footage exploring building 7 just prior to its collapse, parked outside are tons if burnt out vehicles and some still burning - it looked like the Highway of Death. So many things that could have been.
FDNY James Grillo. They are on TH-cam during 9/11 and Larry King after. They were in the Hotel Marriott WTC3 when the South Tower collapsed
I clicked thinking I was going to see a video of firefighters talking about explosions.
Stupid me.
Have you checked out architects and Engineers for 9/11?
Love this channel!
El tema del colapso es que cayó en caída libre y además de haber caído x derretimiento del piso colapsado, x ley física la cantidad de pisos caídos hubieran sido sostenido por igual cantidad abajo …. No hubiese caído de forma libre. Acá se ve que más allá del colapso de los pisos quemados algo le quitó los cimientos. Una caída x arrastre (suponiendo que los 110 pisos se hubieran arrastrado unos tras otros) jamás habrían caído en 8 segundos
Ni hablar del edificio 7 🤐 ese no tenía una sola columna interna como menciona el video …. Hay cosas que no cierran, x algo nunca se terminó de creer la versión oficial.
Watched a video of news chopper flying around building and you can hear some explosions sit rumbling. Fire, fuel, highly combustible materials.
is this real ? how old is the guy talking ?
9/11 was tragic who agrees
👇 (not begging)
I heard in a documentary that the steel plate that connected the floor joists to the core were inadequate for the stresses put on them that day.
Israeli art students lived in the tower for a year with access to every part of the buildings foe a full year
Luckily the owner Gor twice as much as the towers were worth
How many people would you sacrifice for $3billion?
Yesterday I was baking a cake and my oven transformed into a car and drove away. See I can make up stupid shit too.
How do the Rothschilds fit into this? ( ͡⚆ ͜ʖ ͡⚆) 🍿
Crazy how cavemen who couldn't fly little two seaters could put 3 airliners directly on target.
Its definitely not crazy how Israel did this whole op
Not hard to fly a plane after it’s taken off…especially if you have had formal training. Basic instrument knowledge, Throttle and steering
elevators usually have savety breaks? did they not have any breaks or did they fail?
They did have brakes. No elevators free fell to ground
Scary sensation.
What did Muhammad Atta order at Pizza Hut?
What did he order ?
@@45Gunner556 I can't find out. I know he was there at around 9Pm for about 15 minutes, but I couldn't find the order.
uhh, a pizza
The explosion they heard was Muhammad Atta taking a dump on the 98th floor he had taco bell for dinner the night before
What interview was it
the explosion sounds could have been heavy parts of the plane falling down through the floors like the engines or something.
But all of this is irrelevant. The collapse started from
the top down. And then when the collapse was happening - 100+ floors pancaking what would you hear? I love your videos sir but please dont run down rabbit holes.
Speaking of explosion, take a closer look at the first plane's impact. You'll see an explosion at 2 different areas on the floor where the restaurant was. But how could that be if the aircraft struck about 15 floors below? Well, the kitchen's stoves & ovens were gas, not electric. The impact severed a the gas main running up to that floor. No one ever talks about that.
Fantasy story.
I wish you would put a little more work into your productions. Like, when you start talking about specific stuff, then show a picture of the thing or person you're talking about. Use arrows, lines and circles if needed.
Your content is great, but having the same 6-10 pictures running through a diashow while you're talking seems a bit low effort.
What’s the name of your channel?
His videos are good enough and he can create them however he wants.
@@RPKGameVids I give him constructive criticism on his videoes if I want to. The comment section is not only for fanboying.
I’d even settle for links to these videos that he keeps referring to.
Either do better yourself or quit complaining, you have no right to insult someone doing better than you are
The trusses, that held the floors up, melted due to the intense heat causing weight of the floors to collapse like a stack of pancakes on top of each other, like dominos except it was top to bottom.
Did not melt. “Weakened “
Thermite controlled demolition
The side buckles then finally the corner support buckles. That’s why the top section was angled like that.
Both airliners were fuel filled for long flights. These long flights were purposely chosen by the hijacker's to cause more damage than just the impact by having a prolonged fuel fire within both buildings.
The fires where concentrated in both buildings and subsequently weakened the steel structure, which led to the collapses do to weight of the upper floors of both buildings.
The planes had, not very much fuel onboard. Also the fuel burnt direct. Just for a short moment.
Flight 11 38.000 Liter.
Flight 175 34.000 liter.
That isnt much.
I will never understand all the conspiracies. No people on the planes? There are eye witnesses of bodies still buckled into plane seats that had blown out the other side of the building and landed on the ground below. Remote controlled planes? The improbability of the logistics of that aside, people on the planes called their loved ones and I believe I read at least one was talking on the phone at the moment of impact. The plane couldn't bring down the building? The plane didn't bring it down, the fire did. And no thermite was required to melt the steel either. Steel loses stength the hotter it gets in a normal fire. Try heating an iron bar with a simple plumbers torch and you can practically bend it with one finger. I've personally witnessed the aftermath of a middle school fire where a 12" I-beam in the roof got so hot that it sagged half way to the floor below under it's own weight nearly pulling over the block wall it was attached to. Firefighters on 9/11 reported sagging girders and in some video clips you can see what appears to be multiple floors near the impact sight that have dropped/sagged onto the floors below as the fire rages on. The open concept of the towers utilized a central core {which was seriously damaged by the planes} as well as utilizing the outside of the building as the main structure of the building. A system of brackets tied each floor to the outer structural columns of the building. As the heat of the fire weakened the floors they sagged and bowed downwards under their own weight. As this happened it translated into a force pulling inwards on the outer columns of the building, also weakened by fire. Eventually causing the outer structure of the building to buckle inwards. This can clearly be seen in the videos of the collapse. It's fairly basic physics with no special secret government demolition teams needed. The conspiracies all ignore actual evidence in favor of hearsay as well. I've even heard people claim the planes and the collapse was all done in CGI for the TV. A conspiracy that somehow ignores the millions of live eye witnesses in New York that day. As for the government involvement there's no way of knowing with 100% certainty. However the simplest answer is usually correct. And that is that terrorist attacked us and the government simply capitalized on the opportunity. As the saying goes "Never let a good crisis go to waste". Politicians in particular do that on a daily basis so it wouldn't be surprising if the did it after a large disaster. Plus why would 4 planes have been needed to justify going to war anyway? Simply the twin towers would've been enough even if they hadn't collapsed. And why attack the pantagon? No military would intentionally attack their own base of operations. Especially if they had plans to go to war immediately following.
I’m betting this video will get deleted very soon …
.What about a video about would have happened if the planes hit the wtc on the 5th floors
They wouldn’t have, saved you a video
Why fifth floors, specifically?
They’d have never flown in that low as what would’ve been the point? They clearly wanted to trap people. I’m surprised they didn’t fly in a bit lower though say 50 stories up.
Do you mean the 50th floor, because hitting the 5th floor would not be possible because of surrounding buildings.
just a random floor i thought about
C-4 charges detonating can be heard miles away. Of the many videos of the towers collapsing from a mile away, you don't hear any detonations.
But, if you ever watch a video of a controlled demolition, you will hear the charges detonating, and it's very loud.
so they didnt use c4.
Gas tank for stove,diesel reservoir for backup generators...even gas line for heating the buildning...many other things could explode...
I personally saw that video interview of those firefighters stating they themselves heard explosions & I swear one of them said.pop, pop, pop as each floor collapsed that there was a separate explosion. I have since tried to find that video again over the years & never could. Did I actually hear those firefighters correctly? I've wanted to re-watch it just to see if my memory was correct. By the way every one of those firefighters is now dead.. THAT RIGHT THERE & the fact TH-cam has removed the original video tells me a lot. I dont understand why many of the steel beams in the aftermath were shorn off at angles. Nor do I understand why those shorn off beams were quickly carted away sold off for scrap before a clear investigation could be done. I dont understand why the day before Donald Rumsfield announced that the government accidentally just happened to loose $2.3 trillion US dollars. I don't understand how building 7 accidentally fell WITHOUT being hit by a plane...and OH, apparently the records & documents regarding the missing trillions were stored in that building 7. I dont understand why there was no wings or tail of the jet that hit the pentagon. I've seen other horrible plane crashes where the plane itself is obliterated, seats, bodies, luggage, clothing, and airplane parts are strewn all over the ground...but we are told flight 93 just disintegrated right into the ground? No wreckage? No seats, bodies, luggage clothing, wings, engines,...nothing? How about the months of sifting thru the rubble to find bodies but miraculously we just so happened to find the wallets for the terrorists themselves almost immediately. You all believe what you want....I'm not buying it.
Explosions were heard well before the collapse and the lobby of the north tower exploded. The theory of the ball of fire that came down to the lobby via the elevator or the stairs is ridiculous and impossible. People were stuck in the elevators when the plane hit and managed to reach the lobby after security or firefighters restarted it. We see it in the Naudet brothers’ video.
You dont want to lose integrity. Your content is pretty solid. We all seen thousands of videos of 9/11. Interviews etc. Planes were real..etc. Put the blame on the ones who
caused this..
I think with multiple explosions they meant the floors falling on each other, so I think they where talking right after the South tower fell.
Anyway thank you for looking into different things (even conspiracies) but talking sence and trying to find facts and then you actually know about engineeering which many people don't know. And I have definitely seen too that people who say it's impossible that the planes took them down never mention the unique interior but still they make it sound like they are experts.
Good video, don’t call twitter X tho
What if the twin towers were never built
They would have attacked some other buildings around there or maybe the Sears Tower in Chicago, idk
If the Twin Towers had a translucent roof over them, none of this would've happened.
Many explosions happened. But not planted explosives. The fireball reached several levels and even the parking deck. Many cars were on fire, so each time a gas tank was ruptured, another explosion. Small fires on a few floors also happened below the impact zone, either from the fireball, or from debris from other tower. The famous line where the firefighter said only one or two lines to put out a fire, I believe was from one of the smaller fires on a lower level. It is possible one of the smaller fires also compromised something that could combust on another floor. It would even be likely that somewhere in 220 floors of 1 acre each, that there would be renovations on some floor that require some gasoline powered device and there would be a few 5 gallon jugs of gasoline somewhere in those towers.
why those lies.
Very interesting. Also never forget the lost lives. But very interesting
The people in the basement who thought that there was an explosion there but it was a few different things or 1 of these few thing. The elevator dropping and hitting the floor or the blast of the egnighted jetfuel blowing out the doors like in the lobby. Could have been floors collapsing and also things may have exploded, super heated fire extinguishers, trans formers, anything with gas in it, like a propane tank. Bodies hitting the ground also sounded like explosions. Also, people were calling EVERYTHING that day, an explosion. When the building collapsed so many people on film, on news broadcasts were saying "oh look, a third explosion."
They heard an explosion prior to the plane hitting though, their words, not mine.
@jamiewest4765 I know, I believe they were just were wrong.
The guy that escaped from the 81st floor, Stanley Praimnath, his story doesn't add up. I'd love to hear your opinions on it.
i think thats a hollywood script.
I’ve heard his story and brian Clark’s told by them 5-6 different times. They are pretty consistent. What parts don’t add up. Their stories are pretty consistent and plausible regardless if they are lying or exaggerating
The explosions could probably just be some gas lines or some electrical devices, fire extinguishers floors falling and cracking, could be glass or stuff falling or something else. It most likely was not a planted explosion. Interesting conspiracy
make a video on Mohamed atta and Marwan Al-Shehhi being together. their plannings, and their visit to a bar where they drank orange juice and atta was playing video games on an arcade.
There was still tons of melting and burning aircraft aluminum inside the buildings, this came in contact with water from the still working sprinkler system.
What happens if melting aluminum comes into contact with water?
It explodes!
You living in fantasy story mode.
@@TDH8988 BS
@@TDH8988Actually his comment is based on scientific fact; it is YOU who is living in fantasy of conspiracy theories.
FDNY James Jimmy Grillo and his co-workers on TH-cam following the South Tower collapse. They were in the Hotel Marriott WTC3.
some have speculated that plane parts like aluminum being super heated and than water mixing with them could cause an explosion
It is not a speculation, it is a science fact.
you should do a video on a theory. if any of the kitchen staff of windows of the world went into any of the walk-in freezers to escape the smoke and fire and how long would that survived if building's didn't come down.
As much as I hate to say this, but the impacts and the damage that was shown on the news and various videos since, I'm really not surprised they fell. whilst I can't confirm which towers each close up was made at, you clearly saw virtually the whole side of where the planes had impacted being taken out, you also saw on at least one corner area being taken out also.
Can you link the video you saw?
Also, I have nothing but respect for the Firefighters that day that sacrificed everything but, are we to believe that Firefighters are subject matter experts when it comes to bombs and explosives? Well they are not. Sure, they may know a little more than the average civilian but they dont go through any special training that would give them the knowledge of deciphering the difference between explosives and other loud noises that occur when planes traveling between 400mph & 500mph crash into two different 110 story buildings.
Could those explosions be the people jumping? 😢
Kerosene needs some sort of wick to burn really. I don't see what wick material there would be in lift shafts as lift shafts are usually steel and concrete. I watched the second tower get hit and then the two towers collapse live as it was happening on tv here in England UK. I'm pretty sure those towers were demolished by explosives. The towers were built to withstand aircraft flying into them. I understand that high up in the air like that with a breeze the fire could get up to quite a high temperature, but the integrity of the steel below the areas the towers were hit would have remained.
We were being lied to back then, and we are being lied to all the time now about almost everything by our western leaders. The US government and indeed the UK government are criminal organisations and have been for a very long time.
When kersosene is vaporized in a mist it will burn very well and cause explosions. That could be caused by the impact itself, but also when the fuel just fell down the elevator shafts and splash around.
Oxygen
Goverments will lie,but firemens would not in situations like that...
They could withstand impact, which they did. But extreme heat burning through shattered floors, that was not in the list of things that could/would happen when they were built in the 70's.
@@Fragmented1436 Well, they actually did envision an airplane hitting the tower in an accident since it happened to the Empire State in the 40s.
But not a fully fueled up 767. The biggest plane they expected was a 707.
Can someone please explain the logic to me of going through the trouble of learning how to fly planes, hijacking 4 aircraft almost simultaneously, and then killing yourself if you were just going to blow the buildings up with explosives anyway? Like what would be the point of hijacking planes & crashing them into the buildings if you could just blow them up with explosives?
Sometimes I wonder, what was left of the plane when it was burning inside the building. Was it still recognizable? Did it still look like a 767? If the tower never fell, and the plane was taken out of the tower, would it still be in one piece? I have so many questions.
It broke apart into millions of pieces then the fuel blew up
From what I understand it mostly disintegrated some small parts were thrown like wheels or tiny pieces of the engine but for the most part there was nothing left of it
When we wonder things like this, I think it’s difficult for us to truly imagine how brutal the reality was because we only saw it in exterior distance shots for the most part
Hell no!! It would be a mix of confetti and molten globs!!😮
The planes broke up into pieces of different sizes. We know this because parts were found outside of the towers: wheels and an engine were found and photographed outside the towers. There is video of the South Tower which is zoomed in on burning floors and part of the body of the plane is recognizable leaning outside the outer edge of the building. The paint colors can clearly be seen once one visually picks it out from the exterior skin.
If the towers didn't fall, the recovery effort would have included cutting apart any plane parts which were too large to safely be removed by crane.
The plane which hit in the center of the North Tower would have left fewer large parts as it collided directly with the central column and crumpled, split, and/or shredded.
The South Tower plane hung out the side because of the angle it went in at.
I'm guessing you've watched Farenheit 911. It was a real eye opener for me when that came out