The Dangerous Game of Modern Economic Warfare with Doomberg

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ต.ค. 2024
  • The team riffs with Doomberg, a renowned energy analyst, to discuss a range of issues from the global energy landscape to geopolitical tensions and the changing nature of warfare. The conversation also delves into the intricacies of the global natural gas market, the impact of sanctions on Russia, and the potential future of nuclear energy.
    •Discussion on the global energy landscape, with a focus on natural gas and its role in the U.S. economy
    •Insights into the geopolitical tensions, particularly the war in Ukraine, and the implications of the fall of the city of Avdiivka
    •Examination of the changing nature of warfare, with a focus on the use of drones and the complexity of modern military conflicts
    •Analysis of the impact of sanctions on Russia, the effectiveness of these measures, and the potential repercussions on the global stage
    •Exploration of the global natural gas market, its future prospects, and the implications for the U.S. economy
    •Discussion on the weaponization of the U.S. dollar and the potential for gold to emerge as a neutral reserve asset
    •Insights into the potential future of nuclear energy, spurred by Amazon's entrance into the nuclear sector
    This episode offers a deep dive into the complexities of the current global landscape, from energy markets to geopolitical conflicts. It provides valuable insights for anyone interested in understanding these dynamics and their implications for the future. The discussion with Doomberg offers a unique perspective, blending energy analysis with geopolitical understanding, making this episode a must-listen for those seeking to navigate the intricacies of the global stage.
    01:07 Introducing Doomberg: Insights on Geopolitics and Energy
    01:49 Deep Dive into the Ukraine Conflict and Media Narratives
    10:31 Analyzing Sanctions and Their Impact on Global Commodities
    19:51 The Geopolitical Chessboard: Russia, NATO, and the West
    31:48 Border Security and the Controversy of Immigration Policies
    35:30 The Polarization of Solutions in Geopolitical and Domestic Policies
    37:11 Exploring Energy Policies and Natural Gas Dynamics
    38:06 The Economic Power of Cheap Natural Gas in the U.S.
    39:09 Analyzing Global Energy Markets and U.S. Production
    40:27 The Impact of Natural Gas on U.S. Manufacturing and Economy
    41:20 Geopolitical Tensions and Energy Production Insights
    49:57 The Future of Energy: Optimism Amidst Technological Advances
    54:49 The Role of Gold and Cryptocurrencies in the Global Economy
    01:03:24 Addressing Climate Newspeak and the Importance of Free Thought
    01:08:53 Concluding Thoughts: Resilience and Optimism for the Future
    This is "ReSolve's Riffs" - published on TH-cam every Friday afternoon to debate the most relevant investment topics of the day, hosted by Adam Butler, Mike Philbrick, and Rodrigo Gordillo of ReSolve Global* & Richard Laterman of ReSolve Asset Management Inc.
    ===========
    ADAPTIVE STRATEGIES DESIGNED TO ELEVATE TRADITIONAL PORTFOLIOS
    ReSolve is an alternative asset manager which focuses on providing cutting-edge, globally-diversified, and systematic investment strategies that are non-correlated to traditional portfolios. We manage private and public funds as well as bespoke separately managed accounts for investors seeking the potential to smooth out portfolio returns.
    Check our Strategies pages: investresolve....
    RESOLVE EVOLUTION MULTI-STRATEGY FUTURES PROGRAM: pure alpha designed to zig when traditional portfolio’s zag. Our flagship Systematic Global Macro program aims to have zero long-term correlation to global equities and bonds at a similar volatility to global equity markets. investresolve....
    ADAPTIVE ASSET ALLOCATION FUTURES PROGRAM: Combining our best beta and best alpha strategies to create an all-terrain portfolio investresolve....
    RETURN STACKING FOR IDLE MONEY: Putting your lazy money to work. Bespoke mandates that utilize idle capital to stack ReSolve’s diversifying strategies on top. investresolve....
    RETURN STACKED ETFs: Unlocking the benefits of diversification by aiming to layer one investment return on top of another, achieving more than $1 of exposure for each $1 investedinvestresolve....
    For our latest research insights and exclusive content visit our website! investresolve....
    ===================
    *ReSolve Global refers to ReSolve Asset Management SEZC (Cayman) which is registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission as a commodity trading advisor and commodity pool operator. This registration is administered through the National Futures Association ("NFA"). Further, ReSolve Global is a registered person with the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority

ความคิดเห็น • 346

  • @HeSaidWhat369
    @HeSaidWhat369 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +115

    We live in an age where a green chicken on a TH-cam show is a source of informed commentary from considered research of relevant geopolitical events . And the USA president is a meme

    • @jimuren2388
      @jimuren2388 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      "US Presidents who are known by their initials: FDR, JFK, LBJ, FJB"

    • @orangeMANgood4547
      @orangeMANgood4547 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      💀

    • @brainkill7034
      @brainkill7034 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well said

    • @steinbauge4591
      @steinbauge4591 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      the western hypocrisy is pretty thick here though but its mandatory so..

    • @yamomanemjazz
      @yamomanemjazz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wait till the chicken is the president and the president is the source of informed opinion..
      This is especially good interview. Great questions

  • @rogermclaughlin3207
    @rogermclaughlin3207 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    "In fact, the word 'democracy' itself is undergoing a purposeful semantic shift to mean the current slate of leaders retain their power."
    YES!!! I've been saying this but haven't heard anyone else say this until now.

    • @subcitizen2012
      @subcitizen2012 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🤦‍♂️

    • @tristan7216
      @tristan7216 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      "Our Democracy"

    • @sazajac77z
      @sazajac77z 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Correction-reports are that the word democracy has been intentionally changed to mean democratic institutions.

    • @pippip8744
      @pippip8744 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Words in general are being deconstructed or redefined at pace. Democracy is but one.
      The English language is malleable and a word like Hello changed from an expression of curiosity to a greeting quickly, so it is said, due to the telephone.
      The serious issue is when these alterations are highly political and nonconsensual in nature. I'd give examples but it's hard enough to keep comments up on yt these days without going there.

    • @dave7244
      @dave7244 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      A lot of people have said this. Whenever you hear anyone say "Our Democracy" replace with "Our Hegemony".

  • @giantatlas7393
    @giantatlas7393 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Fight for liberty! "A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have" ~ Thomas Jefferson

    • @Deadeye313
      @Deadeye313 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Easy to say when you're rich and own slaves. Jefferson spoke a big game back in the day, but he still was an elite and had a bottom line to look after.

    • @jameskelly9243
      @jameskelly9243 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@Deadeye313 Everyone back then owned slaves even the blacks it was legal.
      Are founding fathers though rich put their lives and property on the line for the common man,most went bankrupt. They gave us the constitution to protect the common man from government.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Jefferson supported the invasion of Canada in 1812. Which he thought would be a cakewalk. 10,000 dead soldiers, a capital city in flames and the country bankrupt was the result. And no palpable gains.

  • @Dancelovecommunity
    @Dancelovecommunity 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    My daughter died from fentanyl poisoning and I agree with doomberg

    • @stp1796
      @stp1796 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Am sorry about your daughter. China has officially banned Fentanyl export to the US in 2019 and clamping down on profiteers exploiting this. DEA Intelligence Report has published DEA-DCT-DIR-008-20 about Fentanyl flow to the US. (Fentanyl is also legally purchased by pharmaceutical and actively used to put people to sleep during life saving surgery.)

    • @kevalan1042
      @kevalan1042 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I'm sorry for your loss

    • @dragosdragon7515
      @dragosdragon7515 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hope she's in a better place

    • @charlespeterson778
      @charlespeterson778 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I had 3 nieces die from fentanyl

    • @manassurya2019
      @manassurya2019 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm so sorry.

  • @llim80
    @llim80 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Doomberg makes 100x more sense than all the Sniders, Van Metres and Gammons put together who just look at the bond curve and scream "recession!"

    • @yamomanemjazz
      @yamomanemjazz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Only van metre lives in a castle... I mean. He goes in there after the show no?
      That mans eyebrow is boss. His balls must be frightening ! 😂😂

    • @penponds
      @penponds 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I like his take on commodities but his take on a US glut in LNG somehow defeating all the recessionary signals is puzzling at least. He needs to look at Australia. We’re sitting on a “gas station” too, plus endless commodities. But we’re on the brink. No savings left, wage suppression by crazy (but legal) immigration policy, oppressive push to green power, and high st (as opposed to official CPI) inflation absolutely rocketing. Limited investment in new business, no one can afford to move, so no labour mobility, scandalous power price increases etc etc etc. AUD remains weak. It’s all setup for IMHO a consumer led recession. All the hydrocarbons in the world not preventing it.

  • @aleaiactaest8354
    @aleaiactaest8354 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Truly enjoyable and insightful conversation. Thx for sharing.

  • @justinwiedeman5017
    @justinwiedeman5017 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Interesting perspective. Thank you for sharing. I disagree on so many points, but I learned much on the contra view.

  • @joelferguson8714
    @joelferguson8714 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    "One of the reasons you don't pick fights in bars is you might lose". LoL I like this guy.

    • @penponds
      @penponds 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Especially when your primary opponent is judo black belt, and you’re a professor of gender studies…

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Shouldn't that apply to Putin?

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@penponds You think the combined power of NATO is analogous to a professor of gender studies? And Russia, a country with a GDP less than Canada, is analogous to a black belt in judo?

  • @lancechapman3070
    @lancechapman3070 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    The average age of a Ukrainian soldier is more like 40 than 20! I'm a bit shocked that you missed this, Doomberg. *concerned*

    • @lancechapman3070
      @lancechapman3070 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I still love your well developed, alternative, and oftentimes seemingly obvious after the fact analysis.❤

    • @mr.q8023
      @mr.q8023 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yeah, now. It wasn't a year ago.

    • @GNelke
      @GNelke 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think the Ukraine situation is a huge psychological operation on at least 2 or 3 fronts.

    • @macmcleod1188
      @macmcleod1188 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Correct, they intentionally are avoiding young men so they can keep their birth rate up.

    • @tobygrice6496
      @tobygrice6496 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ⁠@@GNelke curious in what ways is it psychological?

  • @ZapperJohn
    @ZapperJohn 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    As a Canadian, I love the "despite Justin Trudeau," comment...cheers!

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So you oppose his ramming the transmountain pipeline through?

  • @Dreadnought16
    @Dreadnought16 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    "Our currencies are just derivatives of energy".....wow.....I have never heard that before....that makes me look at currencies and energy in a completely different way!

    • @ashleyaries9299
      @ashleyaries9299 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The reason youve never heard it before is because its utter bullshit and highlights a profound ignorance of Forex and how money is created. There is so much bullshit here you could write a book on why its absurd.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If that were the case the Swiss Franc would be next to worthless. How much energy does Switzerland produce?

    • @matiasrodriguez6981
      @matiasrodriguez6981 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@drmodestoesq In terms of the energy they trade in gold bars, quite a lot. I always think of gold as a perfect way to store enegy because it does not decay. It's like they have no oil, but the have a lot of refining capacity.

  • @rbailey75
    @rbailey75 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Outstanding thought provoking insights from Doomberg as always

  • @gddlsllc
    @gddlsllc 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    The incompetence of American generals and strategists is unbelievable

    • @LibertarianRF
      @LibertarianRF 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It's a show.....the.war racket wants it to go on for as long as possible.

    • @sustainablerenewableintegr8311
      @sustainablerenewableintegr8311 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      They kicked out everyone capable of thinking objectively for refusing the jabs

    • @dudeonyoutube
      @dudeonyoutube 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      At least Milley introduced the importance of pronouns to the military.

    • @dragosdragon7515
      @dragosdragon7515 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@dudeonyoutube😅thanx I wanted to know how screwed we are😢

    • @Deadeye313
      @Deadeye313 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's easy to claim incompetence when you know nothing yourself. The USA has excellent generals, troops, tactics and equipment. But Russia still has thousands of Nuclear weapons so, we'd win a conventional war, but the real war won't be conventional, it'll be Nuclear.

  • @lancechapman3070
    @lancechapman3070 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Lol, re TSA, with no "pre screening" an agent approachs me way back in line and says "Mr Chapman, you are free to proceed." It's not so bad being a veteran :)

    • @lancechapman3070
      @lancechapman3070 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It was a domestic flight

  • @HoroRH
    @HoroRH 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think "This hour has 22 minutes" is tongue-in-cheek for the 60s TV newsmagazine on CBC called "This hour has 7 days". Hard-hitting, controversial, and objective the way news used to be

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      RIP Patrick Watson.

  • @emmanuelananda6551
    @emmanuelananda6551 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Thank you

  • @quietStorm247
    @quietStorm247 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Thank you for bringing this excellent guest!

  • @taratong9074
    @taratong9074 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I just found your channel. I absolutely love Newburgh and follow him. He is spot on.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Who the blazes is Newburgh?

  • @TheCrackupboom
    @TheCrackupboom 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Cluster bombs are not banned by the Geneva Convention or the United States.

    • @garyschneider6644
      @garyschneider6644 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Correct- that made me wonder about Doomberg’s awareness. They are banned by the Convention on Cluster Munitions, to which the USA is not a party.

    • @TheCrackupboom
      @TheCrackupboom 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your average person or above average person, who is not a military person and doesn't understand military matters or weaponry wouldn't know this fact. @@garyschneider6644

    • @thefireman2854
      @thefireman2854 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Putin is not "carpet bombing" Ukraine either. If you want to see what that looks like, go to Gaza. Doomberg may be a 3 letter agency insider. Always spreading some propaganda mixed with some truth.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And Russia has already used them against Ukraine. So that makes the humanitarian argument irrelevant. Doomberg is wrong on a lot of things.

  • @Kristofur77
    @Kristofur77 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    We have over a billion people that still use wood for heat

    • @MarkPoserina-xj5ft
      @MarkPoserina-xj5ft 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The government is giving tax incentives in 2023 to buy efficient coal and wood burning stoves for home heating

  • @bfuller6109
    @bfuller6109 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was my first listen. Amazing session I am now subscribed and looking forward to more great content. Thank you!

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Double check all his assertions. He's wrong on basically everything he says about Russia. The Russian economy is in a world of hurt.

  • @yep3410
    @yep3410 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    While I understand and agree with the point that we're swimming Natgas and therefore have an advantage in staying economically afloat, this conversation does not take into account the effect of our massive deficit spending - which also keeps the economy afloat. Every 3 dollars of deficit spending is only generating $1 of economic 'growth'..... This reality can not be ignored in any analysis of the US economy....

  • @Seawithinyou
    @Seawithinyou 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Watch also Energy Blindness by Petroleum Geologist Arthur Berman and Professor Simon Michaux

  • @penponds
    @penponds 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Let’s be honest, USD remains strong because - what’s the actual, real world alternative?

    • @mathewward6229
      @mathewward6229 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Gold is making a comeback but crypto will win in the end. I know it sounds like a fantasy but it is the most obvious choice, not saying BTC or any of the others but a global CBDC on a shared ledger

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mathewward6229 Chinese people are allowed to buy gold and silver. Cryptos are banned in China.

  • @garyschneider6644
    @garyschneider6644 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Doomberg describes the futility of sanctioning commodities based on volume. But to a considerable extent, we are sanctioning Russian oil based on price.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And he ignores the fact that it's been a huge success. Russian oil and gas revenues have plunged. Don't believe me, believe official Russian government reports.

  • @jimbob2810
    @jimbob2810 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Excellent, intelligent, and very interesting interview!

  • @frv6610
    @frv6610 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is global or American oil price gonna go up a lot?

  • @GeorgeRodrigues-xb6bo
    @GeorgeRodrigues-xb6bo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Moscow has gone on a shopping spree for soldiers, imported weapons, and ramped up its own arms production. The Bank of Finland’s Institute for Emerging Economies (Bofit) finds that most of the growth in Russian manufacturing is in war-related subsectors. The rest of industry has largely stagnated

    • @rometimed1382
      @rometimed1382 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Russia has also lost something like 400,000 men under age 40 just in this conflict. Being generous in their population data, they have likely lost 1.2% of their young male population.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Which means a massively declining quality of life and standard of living and massive inflation. But Doomberg thinks Russia is doing amazing.
      The Russian official reports released by the Russian government report a substantial fall in the revenue from oil and gas.
      So a lot of analysts, including Russian ones, disagree on a fundamental level with his Doomberg's conclusions
      .

  • @meerkats4466
    @meerkats4466 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    However much I hate that this Ukrainian situation was not avoided and possibly even sought out by the Anglo-Saxon front, I do agree Europe should not exclude pro actively drawing the line and secure its borders. The disrespect shown by the Anglo-Saxon is only because it is not adjacent to their borders and therefor the conflict is arrogantly perceived as strategically beneficial.

    • @brainkill7034
      @brainkill7034 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Military industrial complex what?

    • @thefireman2854
      @thefireman2854 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Actually it does. It is just purposely spreading propaganda.

  • @jphone9200
    @jphone9200 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good point about oil energy and recession

  • @tanney9
    @tanney9 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Gents!! Wonderful discussion.

  • @Kristofur77
    @Kristofur77 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Inflation will always drive oil prices higher

  • @jbrown6367
    @jbrown6367 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    8:45 "Russia is a strong country."
    😂
    Angry Bird should have stopped when he said he wasn't an expert.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I know. A country with a GDP smaller than Canada that is circling the drain.

  • @gustavocoelho11
    @gustavocoelho11 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Doomberg, have you seen the chart of XLE and XOP, lately? Cheap energy in the future? Are you sure? 🤔

  • @jemmakay5607
    @jemmakay5607 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    step 2 includes distribution of leagacy weaponry throughout esat and middle east. In prep for step 3

  • @mr.q8023
    @mr.q8023 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As Henke says, a recession is baked in the cake.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That old Reaganite? I wouldn't take anything he says as financial gospel.

    • @mr.q8023
      @mr.q8023 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@drmodestoesq I wouldn't blow it off earlier. Forget Hanke. Look at the yield curve. When NVDIA corrects, it's taking the entire market with it.

  • @frv6610
    @frv6610 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Electricity price forecast?

  • @victorsperandeo3609
    @victorsperandeo3609 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    DOOMBERG YOU HAVE NO IDEA OF WHAT WAR IS !

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah...a cluster bomb hit your caps lock key and JAMMED IT DOWN!!!!!

  • @Freefolkcreate
    @Freefolkcreate 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The third stage of ideological subversion is the crisis phase. By this point, the society is in a state of chaos, with heightened tension and a breakdown of trust in institutions. This crisis could manifest in various forms, including political upheaval, economic collapse, or social unrest. The goal is to push the society to a breaking point where people are desperate for solutions, paving the way for radical change.
    During the crisis phase, external forces may exploit the vulnerabilities within the society, offering alternative ideologies or solutions. This creates an opportunity for a shift in power dynamics and the imposition of foreign ideologies on the now susceptible population.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So you're saying we have to defeat Putin's invasion at all costs?

  • @PaulHigginbothamSr
    @PaulHigginbothamSr 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This all leaves me. 1.unhappy with my nation. 2. Unhappy with it's foreign policy. 3. Unhappy with the war in Ukraine. 4. Unhappy with it's petrochemical situation. I am 76 years old and how can things work out?😅

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Things can work out exactly how you Baby Boomers made them. A bloody disaster. With no end in sight.

  • @the_forbinproject2777
    @the_forbinproject2777 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    the answer is that today we have no adults in charge . We need statesmen/women and the ground is bare .

  • @danieldias8974
    @danieldias8974 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just a thought, what if we let the market buy oil as per normal from Russia but a tariff or royalty of 50% of the buy price goes directly to Ukrainian basically the world is creating a fund for Ukrainian to use out of taxing the oil on Russia the buyer loses nothing he pays the same Russia losses 50% revenue and no supply damage

    • @danieldias8974
      @danieldias8974 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The ball being left in Russia court if they want to keep supplying and of course if all country’s commit to the agreement, hard to ask I guess

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah....Doomberg really is out of touch with that one.

  • @joelferguson8714
    @joelferguson8714 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you want an answer to your question, just read Saul Alinsky Rules for radicals " chaos Anarchy that kinda stuff.

    • @casteretpollux
      @casteretpollux 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Alinsky was an OSS CIA fake commie

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Pffft...As the Big Liebowski said,
      "Your revolution is over Mr. Liebowski! Condolences! The bums lost!"
      And those old 60s radicals turned into the biggest money grubbing Baby Boomer selfish hypocrites in the history of the human race.

  • @peterdorahy8331
    @peterdorahy8331 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great discussion thanks

  • @tristan7216
    @tristan7216 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Pre is awesome, you skip the line and walk in, it cuts a half hour off your airport time. 🥂⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐🥂

  • @davidbarry6900
    @davidbarry6900 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    8:10 "people in their early 20's dying by the scores [in the Ukraine war]" Doomberg is a bit misinformed here. The average frontline soldier age is 43 years on the Ukrainian side, and probably similar on the Russian side. The kids are not being conscripted directly into the war by either side YET. Rather, only previous vets or those who have done prior conscription service, (also prisoners and any foreign workers without papers etc. on the Russian side) are being drafted/mobilized. This will likely change, but the demographics of both nations are such that there are simply many more men aged 40 and older than there are 20-somethings.

    • @casteretpollux
      @casteretpollux 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Men of all ages are running for their lives out of Ukraine to avoid conscription.

    • @sustainablerenewableintegr8311
      @sustainablerenewableintegr8311 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Ukrainian Millenials and Zoomers are being blown to bits or already blown to bits. Modern industrial war is ruthless.

    • @rometimed1382
      @rometimed1382 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ya which isn't great. As each gets into the hundreds of thousands of men lost it means the only recruits coming are gonna be kids or the elderly. If Russia hopes to push past into Romania and Poland they probably want to shore up these loses.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rometimed1382 And everyone with a brain and the resources is getting the hell out of Russia before they get sent to the meat grinder.

  • @johnmitchell2741
    @johnmitchell2741 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks guys for the Talk . Im learning all I can

  • @nodaklojack
    @nodaklojack 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Russia selling oil and gas on the open market and receiving hard currency from Europe was never a good idea.

  • @charleskilpatrick9704
    @charleskilpatrick9704 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Too many people have walked around a refinery and then became commentators. Sorry if this is rude but it is true.

  • @a1samh97
    @a1samh97 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I don't always agree with Doomberg, but I enjoy listening to him and his ideas. He has a fossil fuel bias, but he often makes sense.Please bring him back.

    • @Kevriyal5654
      @Kevriyal5654 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The world has a fossil fuel bias if you didn't notice the most widely used energy source

    • @a1samh97
      @a1samh97 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Kevriyal5654 And this too shall pass. Bring on nuclear, and hydrogen...

  • @pfrohwein
    @pfrohwein 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Doomberg.......the reality is....... YOU HAVE NO REPRESENTATION IN WASHINGTON !!! ZERO ! NONE !

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why? Is he Canadian or something?

  • @jeromehaymaker5071
    @jeromehaymaker5071 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Russian economic parity with Italy, as i have read; does not equate to its portrayal as a powerful nation. Even with 50 year old stocks of military equipment, nukes that it can't utilize and massive man-power inputs from its own and other countries. It can't sustain the war for years more economically. It's hemorrhaging losses of hardware it won't easily replace.

  • @goldmantracks
    @goldmantracks 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    doomberg mentioning the arrow of time made my day. covert timechain hedgeoooor confirmed. great show guys

  • @WW_SHTFF_WW
    @WW_SHTFF_WW 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Raise audio it is too low.

  • @ggusta1
    @ggusta1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The guy in the centers pupils are freaking me out

  • @Kristofur77
    @Kristofur77 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Doomberg at 1.5 speed sounds like Michael Malice

  • @krystianlaskowski
    @krystianlaskowski 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Doomberg is wrong on refineries. If Russia has destroyed refineries, they have surplus of oil they can't process so they have to sell it at a discount to foreign refineries. Also it limits domestic gasoline for citizens making the whole economy less competitive

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And we can prove that conclusively by the fact that Russia has banned refined products like Diesel fuel. And China and India already don't want Russian refined products. All they want is that cheap crude. Which is why Russian oil revenues have plummeted.

  • @WallaceRoseVincent
    @WallaceRoseVincent 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Looking for comments!!!!!! Can someone give commentary on "joe bloggs". That's the TH-cam channel name and he has been saying the Russian economy is in collapse. Is joe bloggs a propaganda operator working for MI6?

    • @Charlie-UK
      @Charlie-UK 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most of the Western press, and many TH-cam channels are parroting government propaganda about Vladimir Putin. He isn't at death's door, and neither is the Russian economy on the brink of collapse. Come to that, Russia isn't on the brink of invading Western Europe. Putin couldn't manage a successful invasion of Kyiv, let alone the whole of Western Europe...

    • @jimuren2388
      @jimuren2388 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Maybe yes. He started off speaking candidly then suddenly transitioned to Teh Western Narrative
      I stopped listening

    • @GNelke
      @GNelke 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He's definitely an agent for someone.

  • @pascalbercker7487
    @pascalbercker7487 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A Doomberg fan watching from France. I've been following Doomberg for a while now. I'm sure I'm not the only Doomberg fan here in France. I used to respect Macron - but my faith and trust in Macron - and in the French political system - has eroded to near zero. To a lesser extent France is being invaded by woke-like propaganda from the USA. Had Europe allied itself with Russia 25 years ago we would be stronger and more powerful than the USA. Russia has all the resources we needed here in Europe. But we are now just vassals to the geopolitical interests of the Americans.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It was Russia that rejected the West. Russia should have used it's vast natural resources to become a diversified economy. Like Texas. Instead the thug Putin decided imperialism was the way forward.

  • @wtfroflffs
    @wtfroflffs 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I saw Doomberg and clicked, expecting an interesting talk on energy policy. Instead I get blather from people who haven’t realised that NATO’s war aims and Ukraine’s war aims are not the same.

  • @nobutjust1
    @nobutjust1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Doombergs ace, but i dont know where TF he gets this carpet bombing from east to west kind of crap from. He still gobbles up the narratives hes fed.

  • @thestonemaster81
    @thestonemaster81 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I learned so much. Thank you

  • @claashielscher7967
    @claashielscher7967 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The green German super-minister for the economy, energy and ecology, Robert Habeck, has just declared that - for Germany - the energy crisis is over and "his work is done". No further comment, I think this speaks for itself.

  • @barbaraatkinson2204
    @barbaraatkinson2204 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Two sides to every narrative

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      More like 8 billion. But I take your point.

  • @johnvandegraf2000
    @johnvandegraf2000 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    i think they talk with a bird ,not sure if i crazy?

  • @WW_SHTFF_WW
    @WW_SHTFF_WW 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mayorkas was born in Cuba and schooled at Berkeley.
    Nuff said.

  • @TheCrackupboom
    @TheCrackupboom 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why are we lying to ourselves Doomberg? Well, given the same passions as reflected in Tacitus's historical characters, people tend to take on the character of those they constantly appear to be and in so doing, they deceive others and themselves.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tacitus was an imperialist.

    • @TheCrackupboom
      @TheCrackupboom 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@drmodestoesq Tacitus was a historian who understood the human condition and an intellectual who documented human psychology and philosophy. To try and project your conception of a 21st century imperialist on an intellectual from more than two thousand years ago reflects what Albert Nock would call a trained mind, not an educated mind.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheCrackupboom The fact that you cannot understand the cultural and ideological biases of a imperialist indicates what Albert Nock would call a trained mind, not an educated mind.

    • @TheCrackupboom
      @TheCrackupboom 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@drmodestoesq Which grouping of people were not, your so-called imperialists during the time of Tacitus? How can any educated person draw a conclusion about Tacitus being an imperialist? What would Tacitus think of the Woke West? He would have no way to conceptualize such a suicidal political orientation because no such lunacy could have existed during his lifetime. Tacitus tells us much about power politics which exist today. The passions and desires of the people are the same in the time of Tacitus as today.

  • @paulrath7764
    @paulrath7764 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Doomberg fails to understand how exactly the war in Ukraine started.

  • @arturl7583
    @arturl7583 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    it is sad to see 3 guys doing nothing but agreeing on everything. And the two noding like horses to whatever Doomberg says. Look at yourself again.

  • @johnhumphrey515
    @johnhumphrey515 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Seven generals got the US through WWII. Now they have over 40 generals and none are qualified as war generals

  • @Thinkingnamesishard
    @Thinkingnamesishard 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I'm sorry this is painful to listen to.
    Doomberg may know how to sell dirt, but he has no idea about warfare, state relations, who's fighting the war, how they're doing it, what's the military situation or how Russia works.
    Just stick to dirt.

  • @mikeygone6255
    @mikeygone6255 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    He's quite naive on certain subjects ie the aims of this current regime by allowing an open southern boeder.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Biden presented a sweeping border reform bill to the Congress. They shot it down because Trump said he didn't want to give Biden a win. So it has all to do with the leader of the previous regime.

  • @mathewward6229
    @mathewward6229 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Also people who think Russia is booming should get a Russian friend because if they are it is not trickling down to the people.

  • @billhammett174
    @billhammett174 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "Steps that we would not take in the west" are you serious? Ever heard about Hiroshima or Nagasaki? Dresden? Vietnam? Iraq? And you think the blame for Fentanyl is China's fault?

  • @bob.love.hope1969
    @bob.love.hope1969 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hahaha, the fight in Ukraine was always in Russia's favor from day 1

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And from month 1 and year 1 and decade 1. Does Afghanistan, Vietnam, Iraq and all the other quagmires ring a bell?

  • @jamesmorton7881
    @jamesmorton7881 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    DHS. . What. A. Total jobs program for the US. Mexico is our future labor pool. ❤❤

  • @chrishardin7183
    @chrishardin7183 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    In the last 3 weeks Russia has lost 15% of its refining capacity. What happens when this gets to 20% or 30% or 40%. At what point does the Russian economy begin to suffer from oil and revenue problems? And will OPEC increase production to offset this leaving Russia to suffer alone?

    • @davidbarry6900
      @davidbarry6900 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Doomberg's thesis is that any reductions in Russian oil production capacity will increase global prices by more than enough to increase Russia's net revenue. Effectively he's predicting that a) oil prices and refined product prices should be going up sharply this week, as prices change by a LOT more than the percentage changes in supply vs demand, and b) a (let's guess) 10% decline in Russian oil export volumes would be compensated for (and definitely were in 2022) by a 50% increase in the price, at least for Russian foreign exchange earnings. There are just a few problems with this old position in the context of the most recent Ua attacks on Russian refineries, and it also doesn't take into account impacts on the broader Russian economy. Note that I haven't seen any recent mention of major changes in the global oil prices, so European spot markets are presumably not expecting the refinery attacks to have any wider impact.
      An interesting recent development (about 10 days ago?) is that Russia has banned the export of refined gasoline, in order to ensure that internal consumers have enough fuel to keep local/internal prices down. That is, internal Russian fuel prices are seen as a politically sensitive issue - or at least they were before Putin's "election" on the weekend of March 16. Presumably if Russian refineries are damaged further by Ukrainian drones, this will also begin to affect the Russian economy (transportation etc.) a bit, but unpredictably. Truckers (and ordinary car drivers) will be unhappy about higher prices (lower availability), but it's very hard to protest about that in a police state where people putting flowers at a memorial can be jailed and/or conscripted. That is, ordinary consumers will likely just suck up the pain for quite a long time - it's likely to take a 40% or more reduction in internal fuel availability before people simply stop showing up for work. (Economies can adapt to changing fuel supplies, but it would take at least 10 years to do that peacefully; a rapid shift is much harder to tolerate.)
      We don't really know what impact lower refinery capacity will have on Russian industry and especially military production. Fertilizer production will likely suffer first, which is bad news a year or so later, but not in the immediate short term. Other chemical industries may also quietly produce less, with no-one willing to complain openly (see my previous comments about consumers being willing to take the pain). I don't think that any military production facilities will collapse despite much higher input prices, because they are living entirely off state funding at the moment, although their output will also decline somewhat.
      We also don't know whether Russia will be able to repair refinery damage properly or rapidly. Yes, they are very short on skilled technical people, especially those younger than 50, those that have been drafted, or those that fled the country. That said, we simply don't know. Can the trainees and drunks and other incompetents still working at those facilities do a good enough job to get damaged refineries 95% operational again, at least for another year or so? Maybe? People do tend to learn on the job, and some of them will do better than expected. It then becomes a game of how quickly Ukraine can keep hitting Russian facilities vs them being repaired, and also how much of Russia's air defenses they are willing to divert away from the front lines to defend obscure industrial plants 500km east of Moscow. All of this will still increase the internal cost of petroleum products to Russian consumers, and reduce their reliability, but for the most part, the oil will likely still keep flowing.
      Another big unknown is whether or not Russia really can profit from oil exports anymore. (It definitely did in 2022.) One of Turkey's oil ports has stopped accepting Russian oil though, and the Houthis have been somewhat indiscriminate about their attacks on shipping in the Red Sea recently, so it's not clear whether Russia can maintain volumes of oil shipped out of the Black Sea. (Ukraine has also been hitting Russian naval ports; they may soon start on the oil shipment facilities too.) Russian oil shipments out of the Baltic (e.g. via Amsterdam) are also facing more scrutiny recently, and are likely to be blocked this year. On the revenue side, Russia is also experiencing problems with oil sales to India and China (the largest consumers), in that they are only willing to pay in their own currencies, and Russia has very little that it can buy from India with Rupees. Oil sales to India are effectively only possible as a gift at the moment. Oil revenue from sales to China CAN be used for SOME purchases of Chinese products, typically golf-cart like light unarmored trucks for transporting goods around the front lines, and Chinese cars (which don't work well on Russian potholes/roads) to replace European cars. That said, a lot of Russian oil exports to China are also effectively not bringing in any usable revenue either - and the Russian government needs that to pay Roubles to state-owned military industries, because the Russian state now funds EVERYTHING in the country. At some point, we will probably see a simple printing of more roubles to fund the Russian military - and hyperinflation will probably follow soon after. That might still be more than two years away though.

    • @chrishardin7183
      @chrishardin7183 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @davidbarry6900 I believe Russian oil production and refining will continue to decline and that OPEC will fill the gap. OPEC does not want oil prices too high because that will cause a global recession, which is not good for business. Russia will be left alone to deal with its oil problems, and it will suffer immensely. I'm not making any sort of a political statement. I'm just recognizing that the Russian economy is propped up by oil. It is their Achilles Heel.

    • @davidbarry6900
      @davidbarry6900 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@chrishardin7183I'm not convinced that OPEC will be able to fill the supply gap. Production has been declining in recent decades globally outside of US Shale.
      I agree that the Russian economy will have some problems with refining capacity going offline. That said, they at least still have internally sourced oil production and refining. It's a much lower level of pain than countries like Pakistan experience if they simply can't get any fossil fuel imports. So yes it will be painful for the Russians, but no-one knows if it will be painful enough to cause any significant impact politically or to their economy. Ukraine is just HOPING for such, and perhaps more challenges for Russia's military too.

    • @GNelke
      @GNelke 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      OPEC could just reverse their production cuts if they are worried about supply or prices.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidbarry6900 That only slightly less long than War and Peace. But brilliantly articulated.

  • @RobWilliams007
    @RobWilliams007 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Joe Bribem is precisely the wrong man at the wrong time in history.

  • @bjd15664
    @bjd15664 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    More "he's a madman" narrative. Haven't we been around this block too many times to realize the recurring theme?

  • @lowtech_1
    @lowtech_1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Boy.They've changed there tune.

  • @justingreen8572
    @justingreen8572 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If magical thinking was a person, it would be doomburg.

  • @hughjass7914
    @hughjass7914 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's far from clear what military engagement with Russia, even if successful, can benefit the United States.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russia won't claim to own the Arctic Ocean if they are defeated.

  • @sadns2000
    @sadns2000 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How is it a chicken on internet makes more sense than the entire nato alliance?

  • @cantacann
    @cantacann 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is based on lies, the EU has put a cap on price, it does not buy above a specific price.
    Also, the idea that Nato, with 20 times more arms than Russia can't win a war with Russia is quite crazy.

  • @NardSpain
    @NardSpain 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nat gas is clean! how my beer lol

  • @DSMentzer1
    @DSMentzer1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Putin could conclude the war in a week if he wanted to. The simple fact of the matter is that continuing the conflict serves his purposes more than concluding it. Russia has accomplished more strategic and geopolitical goals over the course of the conflict than at any time since the fall of the USSR.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What? So Putin is trying to destroy Russia militarily and economically? What is he? A CIA mole?

  • @Nostrildomus
    @Nostrildomus 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What was 😮
    While everyone waits on the leader to finish an elaborate process of rolling excrement into marble's used in competition determining our fate as 'Leader of the free world' .
    T/C/E

  • @jbrown6367
    @jbrown6367 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I just read "Crazy Pills."
    It has aged like milk.
    Three people who know nothing about geopolitics.

  • @yamomanemjazz
    @yamomanemjazz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sometimes I look into those chicken eyes and I feel seen.

  • @buzz-es
    @buzz-es 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What's with the bird....

  • @jstro7136
    @jstro7136 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm a big believer that cheap energy is the largest driver of a successful economy (outside a functional legal system with sufficient propert rights). I'm still not convinced this is enough to keep us from a near term recession. But, maybe we do limp along in stagnation due to cheap energy and deficit spending

  • @JackHawkinswrites
    @JackHawkinswrites 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Ukrainians do not have an Air Force. The USAF is a major part of the US military strategy. There is no analogy between US and Ukrainian militaries

    • @nodaklojack
      @nodaklojack 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Or Navy

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nodaklojack Or a massive satellite and electronic eavesdropping infrastructure.

  • @wobbles7915
    @wobbles7915 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The majority of the guest's "i dont understand why" could be answered readily and quickly with a reading of "Letter to Open Minded progressives" or "The Dark Enlightenment" but I'm not allowed to say that, am I?

  • @douginn3090
    @douginn3090 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Piont of order the green hen would still be British if the french didn't help you in the war of independence
    Ps they have won more wars then any other country

  • @barbaraatkinson2204
    @barbaraatkinson2204 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nat gas will be under pressure for all of 2024 ,pipe lines are full cant flare off absolutely a glut this year maybe some recovery next year ,also supper mild winter this year

  • @nodaklojack
    @nodaklojack 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Doomberg you are interesting and smart but are severely lacking in knowledge of national defense and strategic goals.

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Which is what he's opining on. So that's a problem.

  • @mmoly-cj4bd
    @mmoly-cj4bd 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Ridiculous, ludicrous, however you want to describe it's hard to take the commentary, no matter how good it may be, of a green chicken seriously. Unwatchable.

  • @jamesbottoms8566
    @jamesbottoms8566 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Don't rely on a cartoon bird on the ways of war. Very poorly informed.

    • @mr.q8023
      @mr.q8023 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Poorly informed? How so? Sounds like the propaganda that Ukraine can beat Russia might've got you.

  • @hjht
    @hjht 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    excellent

  • @nodaklojack
    @nodaklojack 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing how people formulate opinions on war and that don't even have a TS/SCI clearance. 😆

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The problem with that argument is the massive screwups that have been made by people who did have security clearance. And the disagreements between them as well.