@caseyanders1601 It's funny they didn't try to make up false crimes until he said he was running for president again.... they have been trying to get him on stuff since 2016....so stop the lies !
@mikew764 They started harrasing him when he said he was running for the first time...they started bad mouthing and lying about him and have never stopped !
I love that fact that you lefty dems are trying to call Trump Dementia boy, a man who never stops moving, did three rally's a day and spies 5 hours a day, while you were perfectly content with REAL DEMENTIA RIDDEN JOE BIDEN, a thief, a liar, and an incompetent. Well, Trump will be President and all these desperate attempts to stop him won't work. Deal with it.
Thry better. When a citizen of this country can be found guilty by 4 of 12 jury members, there is a terribly wrong carrying of not only the justice system, but also the constitution of the United States.
Maybe if Justice Sotomayor involves the whole court. She can make the decision herself. Unfortunately, she has the Southern district in NY under her jurisdiction. I dont see her siding with Trump.
If the supreme Court stops this sentencing we need to excuse every one who is a felon of their crimes. And the judges need to step down. It is so sad because it is no justice it's just us. America That is why we have a constitution
You are completely uneducated. This case will certainly be reversed on appeal. It is an egregious case of lawfare. If he is sentenced, that is the lack of justice. Geez! Do some research before you spout off!
A cult of personality arises when a leader is represented as larger-than-life through imagery and words of uncritical praise and flattery. Propaganda is a common vehicle used to help create personality cults. Leaders are often depicted as superhuman, courageous, wise, and incapable of error.
@@bannedfreespeechYes, deflective behavior is generally considered to be immature, as it is often a defense mechanism used to avoid taking responsibility for one's actions, facing uncomfortable emotions, or confronting issues, which are behaviors typically associated with a lack of emotional maturity; it can be seen as a way to shift blame and avoid accountability, rather than addressing problems directly.
The Big Brain/Little Brain Fallacy (also, the Führerprinzip; Mad Leader Disease): A not-uncommon but extreme example of the Blind Loyalty Fallacy below, in which a tyrannical boss, military commander, or religious or cult-leader tells followers "Don't think with your little brains (the brain in your head), but with your BIG brain (mine).
The Supreme Court must move quickly to do the right thing for this nation, to stop the force of a weaponized justice system! (*ahem, cough** Not to mention The Brunson case!! *Cough*)✅
The circular reasoning fallacy is an argument that assumes the very thing it is trying to prove is true. Instead of offering evidence, it simply states the conclusion, rendering the argument logically incoherent. In a debate, the "onus of proof" (or burden of proof) is typically placed upon the person making the claim, meaning they are responsible for providing evidence to support their position; essentially, the one who asserts a statement needs to prove it is true. Claimant bears the responsibility: The individual making a claim in a debate is the one who needs to provide evidence to support it. "Shifting the burden of proof" fallacy: A common debate tactic where someone tries to make the opposing side prove their claim is negative, instead of providing evidence for their own positive assertion.
A false dilemma is a fallacy that misrepresents an issue by presenting only two mutually exclusive options rather than the full, nuanced range of options. A hasty generalization fallacy is a claim made on the basis of insufficient evidence.
But its fine to go after liz cheney for having the gall to do her job on the Jan 6 committee. prosecuting actual crimes should be thrown out though when its dear leader. All praise our glorious dictator
When all is said and done Trump will have to accept responsibility for his actions. Justice will not accidentally fall down some stairs and be silenced like his exwife.
Will Biden accept responsibility for Afghanistan, two wars, breaking our immigration laws, and betraying his country to foreign adversaries?..probably not.
If they don't then I want every single person that was involved in these bogus charges being filed or tried, charged with election interference and sentenced to prison.
In a debate, the "onus of proof" is always on the person making the claim, meaning the individual who asserts a statement is responsible for providing evidence to support it; essentially, the burden of proof lies with the claimant. Key points about the onus of proof: Claimant responsibility: Whoever makes a claim in a debate is the one who needs to provide evidence to support it. Logical principle: This principle is based on the idea that a statement should not be considered true unless there is evidence to back it up. Shifting the burden of proof fallacy: Attempting to make the opposing party prove a negative claim instead of providing evidence for your own positive assertion is considered a logical fallacy.
The Narrative Fallacy (also, the Fable; the Poster Child) The ancient fallacy of persuasion by telling a "heartwarming" or horrifying story or fable, particularly to less-educated or uncritical audiences who are less likely to grasp purely logical arguments or general principles
A circular reasoning logical fallacy occurs when an argument attempts to prove its conclusion by using the conclusion itself as evidence. In a debate, the "onus of proof" is always on the person making the claim, meaning the individual who asserts a statement is responsible for providing evidence to support it; essentially, the burden of proof lies with the claimant. Key points about the onus of proof: Claimant responsibility: Whoever makes a claim in a debate is the one who needs to provide evidence to support it. Logical principle: This principle is based on the idea that a statement should not be considered true unless there is evidence to back it up. Shifting the burden of proof fallacy: Attempting to make the opposing party prove a negative claim instead of providing evidence for your own positive assertion is considered a logical fallacy.
The Narrative Fallacy (also, the Fable; the Poster Child) The ancient fallacy of persuasion by telling a "heartwarming" or horrifying story or fable, particularly to less-educated or uncritical audiences who are less likely to grasp purely logical arguments or general principles. The Big Brain/Little Brain Fallacy (also, the Führerprinzip; Mad Leader Disease): A not-uncommon but extreme example of the Blind Loyalty Fallacy below, in which a tyrannical boss, military commander, or religious or cult-leader tells followers "Don't think with your little brains (the brain in your head), but with your BIG brain (mine)."
The circular reasoning fallacy is an argument that assumes the very thing it is trying to prove is true. Instead of offering evidence, it simply states the conclusion, rendering the argument logically incoherent. In a debate, the "onus of proof" (or burden of proof) is typically placed upon the person making the claim, meaning they are responsible for providing evidence to support their position; essentially, the one who asserts a statement needs to prove it is true. Claimant bears the responsibility: The individual making a claim in a debate is the one who needs to provide evidence to support it. "Shifting the burden of proof" fallacy: A common debate tactic where someone tries to make the opposing side prove their claim is negative, instead of providing evidence for their own positive assertion.
@@M.J.212they are a MAGAt, chances are if they could read, they absolutely wouldn’t understand what you said. Plus, they absolutely hate reality and facts.
To Trump, delay means never. What’s the point of having a court trial without sentencing? It shouldn’t take the Supreme Court more than five minutes to decide to ignore Trump’s request.
The Supreme Court must move quickly to do the right thing for this nation, to stop the force of a weaponized justice system! President Trump needs the Supreme Court to stop all New York legal problems before he is sworn in office !!
When Voltaire said "those who can convince you of absurdities are those who can make you commit atrocities," he meant that if someone can manipulate you into believing illogical or ridiculous ideas (absurdities), they can also easily persuade you to perform terrible acts (atrocities), as the critical thinking faculty needed to reject the absurd is the same one needed to resist committing evil deeds; essentially, allowing yourself to be convinced of illogical things opens the door to being manipulated into doing harmful things. Key points about this quote: Critique of blind obedience: Voltaire was a strong advocate for reason and critical thinking, so this quote is a warning against blindly following authority or beliefs without questioning their logic, especially when they might lead to harmful actions. Power of propaganda: It highlights how powerful propaganda and manipulation can be in convincing people to do things they might otherwise find morally reprehensible, by presenting illogical ideas as truth. Relevance to historical events: This quote can be applied to situations like religious persecution, political extremism, and mass atrocities where people are convinced to commit violence based on irrational beliefs
@@barney4272 In a debate, the "onus of proof" is always on the person making the claim, meaning the individual who asserts a statement is responsible for providing evidence to support it; essentially, the burden of proof lies with the claimant.Claimant responsibility: Whoever makes a claim in a debate is the one who needs to provide evidence to support it. Logical principle: This principle is based on the idea that a statement should not be considered true unless there is evidence to back it up. Shifting the burden of proof fallacy: Attempting to make the opposing party prove a negative claim instead of providing evidence for your own positive assertion is considered a logical fallacy.
Trump didn’t have a right to steal those secret files and hide them at Mar-a-Lago. Trump didn’t have a right to use campaign funds to pay hush money to his mistress that he had an affair with while his wife was pregnant. Prosecuting a criminal like Trump isn’t trampling on his rights.
@@barney4272 The circular reasoning fallacy is an argument that assumes the very thing it is trying to prove is true. Instead of offering evidence, it simply states the conclusion, rendering the argument logically incoherent. The Narrative Fallacy (also, the Fable; the Poster Child) The ancient fallacy of persuasion by telling a "heartwarming" or horrifying story or fable, particularly to less-educated or uncritical audiences who are less likely to grasp purely logical arguments or general principles
@@RestoreJustice675 Subjective views or opinions are not based on truth or fact. They are one person's unique interpretation of an idea and their own thoughts, feelings, and background. A subjective observation is influenced by a number of factors, including many different types of biases.
@@RestoreJustice675 A circular reasoning logical fallacy occurs when an argument attempts to prove its conclusion by using the conclusion itself as evidence, essentially stating a point without offering any independent justification, making the argument logically invalid and failing to provide real support for its claim. The Big Brain/Little Brain Fallacy (also, the Führerprinzip; Mad Leader Disease): A not-uncommon but extreme example of the Blind Loyalty Fallacy below, in which a tyrannical boss, military commander, or religious or cult-leader tells followers "Don't think with your little brains (the brain in your head), but with your BIG brain (mine)."
Every imminent Constitutional scholar I have heard or read says this case is completely bogus and should never have been brought! More than 100 reversible “errors”. It will most certainly be reversed on appeal.
An "appeal to authority" logical fallacy occurs when someone claims a statement is true simply because a recognized authority figure said it, without providing sufficient evidence to support the claim, essentially relying on the person's status rather than the merit of the argument itself; this can be considered a flawed reasoning tactic as even experts can be wrong on certain topics.
The Narrative Fallacy (also, the Fable; the Poster Child) The ancient fallacy of persuasion by telling a "heartwarming" or horrifying story or fable, particularly to less-educated or uncritical audiences who are less likely to grasp purely logical arguments or general principles.
Subjective views or opinions are not based on truth or fact. They are one person's unique interpretation of an idea and their own thoughts, feelings, and background. A subjective observation is influenced by a number of factors, including many different types of biases.
The Big Brain/Little Brain Fallacy (also, the Führerprinzip; Mad Leader Disease): A not-uncommon but extreme example of the Blind Loyalty Fallacy below, in which a tyrannical boss, military commander, or religious or cult-leader tells followers "Don't think with your little brains (the brain in your head), but with your BIG brain (mine)."
The Narrative Fallacy (also, the Fable; the Poster Child) The ancient fallacy of persuasion by telling a "heartwarming" or horrifying story or fable, particularly to less-educated or uncritical audiences who are less likely to grasp purely logical arguments or general principles
The crime he committed is an important one when it comes to transparency in our system of elections. This isn't some minor offense. People need to be held accountable for their actions even if they are in high positions of power. The problem is that there seems to be a different set of rules for people with money and power.
Subjective views or opinions are not based on truth or fact. They are one person's unique interpretation of an idea and their own thoughts, feelings, and background. A subjective observation is influenced by a number of factors, including many different types of biases.
The Narrative Fallacy (also, the Fable; the Poster Child) The ancient fallacy of persuasion by telling a "heartwarming" or horrifying story or fable, particularly to less-educated or uncritical audiences who are less likely to grasp purely logical arguments or general principles. The Big Brain/Little Brain Fallacy (also, the Führerprinzip; Mad Leader Disease): A not-uncommon but extreme example of the Blind Loyalty Fallacy below, in which a tyrannical boss, military commander, or religious or cult-leader tells followers "Don't think with your little brains (the brain in your head), but with your BIG brain (mine)."
Yes, the Bible warns against charlatans, or people who promote religion for their own gain. This is addressed in the Bible in the following passages: II Corinthians 2:17, 11:13-15, and I Timothy 6:5. The Apostles Paul and Peter addressed this issue in the first century, and it is still a problem today. The Bible also warns against hypocrisy, as in Luke 12:1, where Jesus warns his disciples to "Beware of the yeast of the Pharisees-their hypocrisy"
@juanito5220 Yes, deflecting behavior is generally considered an immature behavior, as it often indicates a lack of ability to take responsibility for one's actions, deal with criticism, or engage in honest communication, often used as a defense mechanism to avoid facing uncomfortable feelings or situations. Avoiding accountability: People who deflect frequently might struggle to acknowledge their own mistakes or take responsibility for their actions. Defense mechanism: Deflection is considered a psychological defense mechanism, and when used excessively, it can be a sign of emotional immaturity.
@juanito5220 What is an assumption in simple terms? assumption noun (BELIEF) something that you accept as true without question or ✳️proof. A hasty generalization fallacy is a claim made on the basis of insufficient ✳️evidence spec·u·la·tion noun 1. the forming of a theory or conjecture without firm ✳️evidence. Detect a trend with the above definitions🤔
The Narrative Fallacy (also, the Fable; the Poster Child) The ancient fallacy of persuasion by telling a "heartwarming" or horrifying story or fable, particularly to less-educated or uncritical audiences who are less likely to grasp purely logical arguments or general principles.
The circular reasoning fallacy is an argument that assumes the very thing it is trying to prove is true. Instead of offering evidence, it simply states the conclusion, rendering the argument logically incoherent. In a debate, the "onus of proof" (or burden of proof) is typically placed upon the person making the claim, meaning they are responsible for providing evidence to support their position; essentially, the one who asserts a statement needs to prove it is true. Claimant bears the responsibility: The individual making a claim in a debate is the one who needs to provide evidence to support it. "Shifting the burden of proof" fallacy: A common debate tactic where someone tries to make the opposing side prove their claim is negative, instead of providing evidence for their own positive assertion.
The Big Brain/Little Brain Fallacy (also, the Führerprinzip; Mad Leader Disease): A not-uncommon but extreme example of the Blind Loyalty Fallacy below, in which a tyrannical boss, military commander, or religious or cult-leader tells followers "Don't think with your little brains (the brain in your head), but with your BIG brain (mine).
The Narrative Fallacy (also, the Fable; the Poster Child) The ancient fallacy of persuasion by telling a "heartwarming" or horrifying story or fable, particularly to less-educated or uncritical audiences who are less likely to grasp purely logical arguments or general principles. The Big Brain/Little Brain Fallacy (also, the Führerprinzip; Mad Leader Disease): A not-uncommon but extreme example of the Blind Loyalty Fallacy below, in which a tyrannical boss, military commander, or religious or cult-leader tells followers "Don't think with your little brains (the brain in your head), but with your BIG brain (mine)."
The Narrative Fallacy (also, the Fable; the Poster Child) The ancient fallacy of persuasion by telling a "heartwarming" or horrifying story or fable, particularly to less-educated or uncritical audiences who are less likely to grasp purely logical arguments or general principles.
@@mikew764 Great, so if the entire world knows, what was the crime that was committed? It's because of people like you that the DNC lost the White House and the entirety of Congress, so congrats.
The Big Brain/Little Brain Fallacy (also, the Führerprinzip; Mad Leader Disease): A not-uncommon but extreme example of the Blind Loyalty Fallacy below, in which a tyrannical boss, military commander, or religious or cult-leader tells followers "Don't think with your little brains (the brain in your head), but with your BIG brain (mine)."
No, there should be no dismissal of charges. Trump has been found guilty on all 34 counts. This guilty verdict was decided by a jury, not 1 judge. So, are you saying the courts should throw out a jury's verdict when you don't like their decision?
Many Americans have a great memory - twice impeached, 34 counts, January 6, 2021, etc. NO supreme courts decisions can erase these despicable events. They will be written about for years. Please do not watch the January 20 inauguration, pray for heavy rain or snowfall - this will hurt his ego and then some.
Why was he impeached? what crimes did he commit for felonies? And why would Trump care when a minority of voters dont watch him? he won the majority of the country
Apparently there are so sets of rules and laws in this country. Prove me wrong.
especially since they use lawfare to take out a presidential candidate..
What about the laws he broke? lol
@caseyanders1601 It's funny they didn't try to make up false crimes until he said he was running for president again.... they have been trying to get him on stuff since 2016....so stop the lies !
@@Kim-n-Brian actually this started in 2019 before he office. Started in 2017 if you count Cohens prosecution which was the stepping stone. lol
@mikew764 They started harrasing him when he said he was running for the first time...they started bad mouthing and lying about him and have never stopped !
Dementia boy need disqualified from office is all that needs done and his offenses need to stay in place Amen.
I love that fact that you lefty dems are trying to call Trump Dementia boy, a man who never stops moving, did three rally's a day and spies 5 hours a day, while you were perfectly content with REAL DEMENTIA RIDDEN JOE BIDEN, a thief, a liar, and an incompetent. Well, Trump will be President and all these desperate attempts to stop him won't work. Deal with it.
Joe? right
Trump will be sentenced this Friday.
Then sworn in on Martin Luther King day
to probation
What was the crime? Can you name them? I bet you can't.
Deportation orders awaiting?
Let's see what Trump's Supreme Court will do! I'll bet they let him off the hook!
Thry better. When a citizen of this country can be found guilty by 4 of 12 jury members, there is a terribly wrong carrying of not only the justice system, but also the constitution of the United States.
Its not about Trump. It’s about Presidential immunity in general that the SC needs to decide.
@@Bruce-kx5ku There is no immunity for acts committed before becoming president. Becoming president doesn't change that
As they should.
His buddies on the SCOTUS will protect him. That's why he appointed them. They owe him. He owns them.
Maybe if Justice Sotomayor involves the whole court. She can make the decision herself. Unfortunately, she has the Southern district in NY under her jurisdiction.
I dont see her siding with Trump.
Right! And the American people enabled all of it!
If the supreme Court stops this sentencing we need to excuse every one who is a felon of their crimes. And the judges need to step down. It is so sad because it is no justice it's just us. America That is why we have a constitution
You're not very smart. Thanks for letting us know. 😂😂😂🤡
Your a fool and what is wrong with this country.
Lol yes that makes so much sense. 😂😂😂😂
You are completely uneducated. This case will certainly be reversed on appeal. It is an egregious case of lawfare. If he is sentenced, that is the lack of justice. Geez! Do some research before you spout off!
@@garyarford5169 Then let it get reversed on appeal. Let the process play out as its supposed to. No special treatment.
A cult of personality arises when a leader is represented as larger-than-life through imagery and words of uncritical praise and flattery. Propaganda is a common vehicle used to help create personality cults. Leaders are often depicted as superhuman, courageous, wise, and incapable of error.
Like Obama
I think you misspelled the cult of justice and truth agaisnt injustice and lawfare.
@@bannedfreespeechYes, deflective behavior is generally considered to be immature, as it is often a defense mechanism used to avoid taking responsibility for one's actions, facing uncomfortable emotions, or confronting issues, which are behaviors typically associated with a lack of emotional maturity; it can be seen as a way to shift blame and avoid accountability, rather than addressing problems directly.
The Big Brain/Little Brain Fallacy (also, the Führerprinzip; Mad Leader Disease): A not-uncommon but extreme example of the Blind Loyalty Fallacy below, in which a tyrannical boss, military commander, or religious or cult-leader tells followers "Don't think with your little brains (the brain in your head), but with your BIG brain (mine).
@@mindhunter09 "LAWFARE" is newspeak- a vile, made-up, Fox News propaganda term ...
The Supreme Court must move quickly to do the right thing for this nation, to stop the force of a weaponized justice system! (*ahem, cough** Not to mention The Brunson case!! *Cough*)✅
😂😂😂🎉😂😂
The circular reasoning fallacy is an argument that assumes the very thing it is trying to prove is true. Instead of offering evidence, it simply states the conclusion, rendering the argument logically incoherent.
In a debate, the "onus of proof" (or burden of proof) is typically placed upon the person making the claim, meaning they are responsible for providing evidence to support their position; essentially, the one who asserts a statement needs to prove it is true. Claimant bears the responsibility:
The individual making a claim in a debate is the one who needs to provide evidence to support it.
"Shifting the burden of proof" fallacy:
A common debate tactic where someone tries to make the opposing side prove their claim is negative, instead of providing evidence for their own positive assertion.
A false dilemma is a fallacy that misrepresents an issue by presenting only two mutually exclusive options rather than the full, nuanced range of options.
A hasty generalization fallacy is a claim made on the basis of insufficient evidence.
THE RIGHT THING IS LET HIM BE SENTENCED.... SUPREME COURT DOESNT EVEN LIKE TRUMP
But its fine to go after liz cheney for having the gall to do her job on the Jan 6 committee. prosecuting actual crimes should be thrown out though when its dear leader. All praise our glorious dictator
When all is said and done Trump will have to accept responsibility for his actions. Justice will not accidentally fall down some stairs and be silenced like his exwife.
Will Biden accept responsibility for Afghanistan, two wars, breaking our immigration laws, and betraying his country to foreign adversaries?..probably not.
justice for what crime?
If the Supreme Court allows this we might as well give up now 🤦🏻♀️😢😢😢
If they don't then I want every single person that was involved in these bogus charges being filed or tried, charged with election interference and sentenced to prison.
Perhaps your dumbest post ever
I think this is the will of the voters. Punish everyone involved who brought false weaponized charges
@@Bruce-kx5ku Remember when Comer tried to impeach Biden but had no evidence of wrongdoing? That was funny.
@@sg24336 remember when they impeached Trump for looking into ukraine then we found out biden family was involved in ukraine
@@sg24336 well actually it was more the WH blocking them from gathering more evidence.
😮😮😮HEY YALL ENOUGH IS ENOUGH THEY HAVE DONE EVERYTHING THEY COULD DO HAVE TO STOP THIS NOW 😮😮
And anything illegal the president does outside of his job is punishable per the Supreme Court and the 34 counts are outside his job as president.
Hope they do as this is ludicrous
When will this guy stop? I'm so tired of it all, and I don't want my energy drained by the fool. Please make him stop.
The only FOOL is the guy CURRENTLY in the White House and all those who believe he is competent an honest. Thankfully he will be gone in 12 days time.
At this point, he can just pardon himself. Unfortunately, he will not face any real consequences from his conviction.
No he cant
Trump can not get a fair trial in New York.
In a debate, the "onus of proof" is always on the person making the claim, meaning the individual who asserts a statement is responsible for providing evidence to support it; essentially, the burden of proof lies with the claimant.
Key points about the onus of proof:
Claimant responsibility:
Whoever makes a claim in a debate is the one who needs to provide evidence to support it.
Logical principle:
This principle is based on the idea that a statement should not be considered true unless there is evidence to back it up.
Shifting the burden of proof fallacy:
Attempting to make the opposing party prove a negative claim instead of providing evidence for your own positive assertion is considered a logical fallacy.
A circular reasoning logical fallacy occurs when an argument attempts to prove its conclusion by using the conclusion itself as evidence.
The Narrative Fallacy (also, the Fable; the Poster Child) The ancient fallacy of persuasion by telling a "heartwarming" or horrifying story or fable, particularly to less-educated or uncritical audiences who are less likely to grasp purely logical arguments or general principles
He already had one he is guilty
And he doesn't deserve one!
Lawfare
NO SUCH TERM.... YOU'RE NOT COLLEGE EDUCATED, HUH?
A circular reasoning logical fallacy occurs when an argument attempts to prove its conclusion by using the conclusion itself as evidence.
In a debate, the "onus of proof" is always on the person making the claim, meaning the individual who asserts a statement is responsible for providing evidence to support it; essentially, the burden of proof lies with the claimant.
Key points about the onus of proof:
Claimant responsibility:
Whoever makes a claim in a debate is the one who needs to provide evidence to support it.
Logical principle:
This principle is based on the idea that a statement should not be considered true unless there is evidence to back it up.
Shifting the burden of proof fallacy:
Attempting to make the opposing party prove a negative claim instead of providing evidence for your own positive assertion is considered a logical fallacy.
The Narrative Fallacy (also, the Fable; the Poster Child) The ancient fallacy of persuasion by telling a "heartwarming" or horrifying story or fable, particularly to less-educated or uncritical audiences who are less likely to grasp purely logical arguments or general principles.
The Big Brain/Little Brain Fallacy (also, the Führerprinzip; Mad Leader Disease): A not-uncommon but extreme example of the Blind Loyalty Fallacy below, in which a tyrannical boss, military commander, or religious or cult-leader tells followers "Don't think with your little brains (the brain in your head), but with your BIG brain (mine)."
The majority believe this is lawfare and thats why they lost the election.
@@M.J.212 I get where you're coming from, but that's way over the head of a trump supporter
The judge and his daughter are criminal
The circular reasoning fallacy is an argument that assumes the very thing it is trying to prove is true. Instead of offering evidence, it simply states the conclusion, rendering the argument logically incoherent.
In a debate, the "onus of proof" (or burden of proof) is typically placed upon the person making the claim, meaning they are responsible for providing evidence to support their position; essentially, the one who asserts a statement needs to prove it is true. Claimant bears the responsibility:
The individual making a claim in a debate is the one who needs to provide evidence to support it.
"Shifting the burden of proof" fallacy:
A common debate tactic where someone tries to make the opposing side prove their claim is negative, instead of providing evidence for their own positive assertion.
NO THEY AREN'T.... WHEN WE THEY CONVICTED?
NOPE.... ONLY CRIMINAL IS TRUMP, PROVEN FACT
Don't forget the juries too... Sounds like you know nothing about the case, but you are uneductated. Just like Trump wants...
You're too funny!
@@M.J.212they are a MAGAt, chances are if they could read, they absolutely wouldn’t understand what you said. Plus, they absolutely hate reality and facts.
To Trump, delay means never. What’s the point of having a court trial without sentencing? It shouldn’t take the Supreme Court more than five minutes to decide to ignore Trump’s request.
Lots of Russians here today
The Supreme Court must move quickly to do the right thing for this nation, to stop the force of a weaponized justice system! President Trump needs the Supreme Court to stop all New York legal problems before he is sworn in office !!
Political witchhunt, and he never stood a chance for a fair trial in a New York courtroom. Toss it out.
When Voltaire said "those who can convince you of absurdities are those who can make you commit atrocities," he meant that if someone can manipulate you into believing illogical or ridiculous ideas (absurdities), they can also easily persuade you to perform terrible acts (atrocities), as the critical thinking faculty needed to reject the absurd is the same one needed to resist committing evil deeds; essentially, allowing yourself to be convinced of illogical things opens the door to being manipulated into doing harmful things.
Key points about this quote:
Critique of blind obedience:
Voltaire was a strong advocate for reason and critical thinking, so this quote is a warning against blindly following authority or beliefs without questioning their logic, especially when they might lead to harmful actions.
Power of propaganda:
It highlights how powerful propaganda and manipulation can be in convincing people to do things they might otherwise find morally reprehensible, by presenting illogical ideas as truth.
Relevance to historical events:
This quote can be applied to situations like religious persecution, political extremism, and mass atrocities where people are convinced to commit violence based on irrational beliefs
SCOTUS should review the Trump case completely since Trump's rights were trampled
Huh…?
@@barney4272 In a debate, the "onus of proof" is always on the person making the claim, meaning the individual who asserts a statement is responsible for providing evidence to support it; essentially, the burden of proof lies with the claimant.Claimant responsibility:
Whoever makes a claim in a debate is the one who needs to provide evidence to support it.
Logical principle:
This principle is based on the idea that a statement should not be considered true unless there is evidence to back it up.
Shifting the burden of proof fallacy:
Attempting to make the opposing party prove a negative claim instead of providing evidence for your own positive assertion is considered a logical fallacy.
Trump didn’t have a right to steal those secret files and hide them at Mar-a-Lago.
Trump didn’t have a right to use campaign funds to pay hush money to his mistress that he had an affair with while his wife was pregnant.
Prosecuting a criminal like Trump isn’t trampling on his rights.
How so?
@@barney4272 The circular reasoning fallacy is an argument that assumes the very thing it is trying to prove is true. Instead of offering evidence, it simply states the conclusion, rendering the argument logically incoherent.
The Narrative Fallacy (also, the Fable; the Poster Child) The ancient fallacy of persuasion by telling a "heartwarming" or horrifying story or fable, particularly to less-educated or uncritical audiences who are less likely to grasp purely logical arguments or general principles
Trumps trial needs to be thrown out and so does mr Jaun Merchan.
@@RestoreJustice675 Subjective views or opinions are not based on truth or fact. They are one person's unique interpretation of an idea and their own thoughts, feelings, and background. A subjective observation is influenced by a number of factors, including many different types of biases.
@@RestoreJustice675 A circular reasoning logical fallacy occurs when an argument attempts to prove its conclusion by using the conclusion itself as evidence, essentially stating a point without offering any independent justification, making the argument logically invalid and failing to provide real support for its claim.
The Big Brain/Little Brain Fallacy (also, the Führerprinzip; Mad Leader Disease): A not-uncommon but extreme example of the Blind Loyalty Fallacy below, in which a tyrannical boss, military commander, or religious or cult-leader tells followers "Don't think with your little brains (the brain in your head), but with your BIG brain (mine)."
Why do they "need to" be thrown out! Just because Trump is president doesn't mean he's not a criminal!!
@@M.J.212 Name Trump's crime.
@@RestoreJustice675 Its been publicly know for two years. How do you still not know what it is?
THIS is the only reason he ran for president. He's lucky he had his little crony in Florida blocking the more serious cases. A sad election this was.
You can't forget about the grifting opportunities, his gullible followers have been financing his personal legal fees and lifestyle.
Kamala was the first Indian woman to certify her own election defeat, making history.
Fight fight fight! Go Mr. President
Yup go to jail
how many time does this criminal have to ask appeals court and supreme court for appeal, next is the tennis court or food court
It will be final proof that they are bought and paid for !
Every imminent Constitutional scholar I have heard or read says this case is completely bogus and should never have been brought! More than 100 reversible “errors”. It will most certainly be reversed on appeal.
Stop lying
An "appeal to authority" logical fallacy occurs when someone claims a statement is true simply because a recognized authority figure said it, without providing sufficient evidence to support the claim, essentially relying on the person's status rather than the merit of the argument itself; this can be considered a flawed reasoning tactic as even experts can be wrong on certain topics.
The Narrative Fallacy (also, the Fable; the Poster Child) The ancient fallacy of persuasion by telling a "heartwarming" or horrifying story or fable, particularly to less-educated or uncritical audiences who are less likely to grasp purely logical arguments or general principles.
who are those imminent Constitutional scholars? give names
Do his lawyers explain the law to him? Jeez, even a 10yo has more comprehension than this guy.
They should be thrown out. It was ridiculous that he was charged.
It was for tax evasion. That's what they got Al Capone on as well
Subjective views or opinions are not based on truth or fact. They are one person's unique interpretation of an idea and their own thoughts, feelings, and background. A subjective observation is influenced by a number of factors, including many different types of biases.
The Big Brain/Little Brain Fallacy (also, the Führerprinzip; Mad Leader Disease): A not-uncommon but extreme example of the Blind Loyalty Fallacy below, in which a tyrannical boss, military commander, or religious or cult-leader tells followers "Don't think with your little brains (the brain in your head), but with your BIG brain (mine)."
The Narrative Fallacy (also, the Fable; the Poster Child) The ancient fallacy of persuasion by telling a "heartwarming" or horrifying story or fable, particularly to less-educated or uncritical audiences who are less likely to grasp purely logical arguments or general principles
@@M.J.212Yeah like your narrative that the charges were legitimate? That kind of story telling?
What special rights does Trumpf have over regular US citizens, so that the Supreme Court has to shield him from his own bad behavior???
😮😮😮😮 🎉🎉
charlatan:a person falsely claiming to have a special knowledge or skill; a ✳️fraud.
"a self-confessed con artist and charlatan"
This bs case never should have gotten this far. Throw it out and focus on violent criminals victimizing the American citizens of your jurisdiction.
The crime he committed is an important one when it comes to transparency in our system of elections. This isn't some minor offense. People need to be held accountable for their actions even if they are in high positions of power. The problem is that there seems to be a different set of rules for people with money and power.
Subjective views or opinions are not based on truth or fact. They are one person's unique interpretation of an idea and their own thoughts, feelings, and background. A subjective observation is influenced by a number of factors, including many different types of biases.
The Narrative Fallacy (also, the Fable; the Poster Child) The ancient fallacy of persuasion by telling a "heartwarming" or horrifying story or fable, particularly to less-educated or uncritical audiences who are less likely to grasp purely logical arguments or general principles.
The Big Brain/Little Brain Fallacy (also, the Führerprinzip; Mad Leader Disease): A not-uncommon but extreme example of the Blind Loyalty Fallacy below, in which a tyrannical boss, military commander, or religious or cult-leader tells followers "Don't think with your little brains (the brain in your head), but with your BIG brain (mine)."
All convicted criminals have an automatic right of appeal. There is no pertinent question for SCOTUS at this point.
Not a fan of expanding the SC but maybe they should have two one for everyone and one just for trumps cases.😅
Yes, the Bible warns against charlatans, or people who promote religion for their own gain. This is addressed in the Bible in the following passages: II Corinthians 2:17, 11:13-15, and I Timothy 6:5.
The Apostles Paul and Peter addressed this issue in the first century, and it is still a problem today.
The Bible also warns against hypocrisy, as in Luke 12:1, where Jesus warns his disciples to "Beware of the yeast of the Pharisees-their hypocrisy"
And those verses ALL have Trumpy's name all over them. He is apparently the Antichrist.
Like you worshipping Obama. Got it girl!!!!
@juanito5220 Yes, deflecting behavior is generally considered an immature behavior, as it often indicates a lack of ability to take responsibility for one's actions, deal with criticism, or engage in honest communication, often used as a defense mechanism to avoid facing uncomfortable feelings or situations.
Avoiding accountability:
People who deflect frequently might struggle to acknowledge their own mistakes or take responsibility for their actions. Defense mechanism:
Deflection is considered a psychological defense mechanism, and when used excessively, it can be a sign of emotional immaturity.
@juanito5220 What is an assumption in simple terms?
assumption noun (BELIEF)
something that you accept as true without question or ✳️proof.
A hasty generalization fallacy is a claim made on the basis of insufficient ✳️evidence
spec·u·la·tion
noun
1.
the forming of a theory or conjecture without firm ✳️evidence.
Detect a trend with the above definitions🤔
if jesus wants to block the hush money then it should be done just ask the people in the bible belt
WE are 100MILLION+ STRONG. MAGA NATION!!!🎉🎉🎉
The Narrative Fallacy (also, the Fable; the Poster Child) The ancient fallacy of persuasion by telling a "heartwarming" or horrifying story or fable, particularly to less-educated or uncritical audiences who are less likely to grasp purely logical arguments or general principles.
This is true. MAGA did win the majority of voters. every demographic also shifted rightward.
Nothing but Trumps truth Trumps law
Don the crap Con
Grandpa Trump is being sentenced on January 10th at 10:00 a.m. here in Manhattan
House arrest for 4 years with an ankle monitor.😅
God Bless our SCOTUS. 🇺🇸👍
💰💰We have the best SCOTUS that money can buy! 💰💰💰💰💰
Scrotum
YEP, WHO ALREADY REFUSED TO TAKE THE CASE AND SAID TRUMP SHOULD BE SENTENCED
@@mattmckinney4213 ah… the truth hurts.
No. He must be jailed
Please God.. protect Trump! 🙏🙏🙏🇺🇸🌎
Good Morning Donald Trump Mr President
The whole case was bulshit dropped the whole thing
The circular reasoning fallacy is an argument that assumes the very thing it is trying to prove is true. Instead of offering evidence, it simply states the conclusion, rendering the argument logically incoherent.
In a debate, the "onus of proof" (or burden of proof) is typically placed upon the person making the claim, meaning they are responsible for providing evidence to support their position; essentially, the one who asserts a statement needs to prove it is true. Claimant bears the responsibility:
The individual making a claim in a debate is the one who needs to provide evidence to support it.
"Shifting the burden of proof" fallacy:
A common debate tactic where someone tries to make the opposing side prove their claim is negative, instead of providing evidence for their own positive assertion.
The Big Brain/Little Brain Fallacy (also, the Führerprinzip; Mad Leader Disease): A not-uncommon but extreme example of the Blind Loyalty Fallacy below, in which a tyrannical boss, military commander, or religious or cult-leader tells followers "Don't think with your little brains (the brain in your head), but with your BIG brain (mine).
The Narrative Fallacy (also, the Fable; the Poster Child) The ancient fallacy of persuasion by telling a "heartwarming" or horrifying story or fable, particularly to less-educated or uncritical audiences who are less likely to grasp purely logical arguments or general principles.
The Big Brain/Little Brain Fallacy (also, the Führerprinzip; Mad Leader Disease): A not-uncommon but extreme example of the Blind Loyalty Fallacy below, in which a tyrannical boss, military commander, or religious or cult-leader tells followers "Don't think with your little brains (the brain in your head), but with your BIG brain (mine)."
That's not Breaking News
Horrible man
the supreme court must get involved
When is trump going act or talk about what he campaigned on? He’s failing! Big time!
Ya do realize he hasn't even been sworn in yet???
Not In Office yet. Duh
@@torrilunzer131 he’s has talked anything and everything but what he campaigned on! He’s grifting us!
@ Duh 🙄
He should. Bull shit case!!!!
Why are you hiding the truth?
The Narrative Fallacy (also, the Fable; the Poster Child) The ancient fallacy of persuasion by telling a "heartwarming" or horrifying story or fable, particularly to less-educated or uncritical audiences who are less likely to grasp purely logical arguments or general principles.
Corruption
Correct, the charges were corrupt
Can anyone cite the actual crime? Anyone? But yeah, totally about law and order.
Try reading the indictment. Embarrassing yourself
@@mikew764 So you can't, got it.
The entire world knows. Why dont you? Just making a fool of yourself lol
@@mikew764 Great, so if the entire world knows, what was the crime that was committed? It's because of people like you that the DNC lost the White House and the entirety of Congress, so congrats.
@@mikew764I can tell you dont know what it is either dude.
For once in your life think about Americans in this country. Have respect for the decision that the judge will make. The world is watching
Trump is the truth 👏👏👏
oxymoron: a figure of speech in which apparently contradictory terms appear in conjunction (e.g. faith unfaithful kept him falsely true ).
The Big Brain/Little Brain Fallacy (also, the Führerprinzip; Mad Leader Disease): A not-uncommon but extreme example of the Blind Loyalty Fallacy below, in which a tyrannical boss, military commander, or religious or cult-leader tells followers "Don't think with your little brains (the brain in your head), but with your BIG brain (mine)."
@M.J.212 We need more of Trump 👏👏!
Hahaha!!
Dismiss all charges
No, there should be no dismissal of charges. Trump has been found guilty on all 34 counts.
This guilty verdict was decided by a jury, not 1 judge. So, are you saying the courts should throw out a jury's verdict when you don't like their decision?
@@judybritt6288You are clearly inaware of what he is charged of.
@@Bruce-kx5ku You're clearly unaware of what he is charged with lol
@@mikew764 that makes both of us
@@Bruce-kx5ku Wrong again lol
Many Americans have a great memory - twice impeached, 34 counts, January 6, 2021, etc. NO
supreme courts decisions can erase these despicable events. They will be written about for years.
Please do not watch the January 20 inauguration, pray for heavy rain or snowfall - this will hurt his ego and then some.
I DON'T BELEIVE ANYMORE
LAWFARE FROM DEMOCRATS
Why was he impeached? what crimes did he commit for felonies? And why would Trump care when a minority of voters dont watch him? he won the majority of the country
7-2 is my guess.
Lol