Does the New 2024 Toyota Tacoma's Massive Chin Spoiler Actually Do Anything? We Put It to the Test
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ค. 2024
- TFL runs on Sinclair fuel and so should you. Download the Sinclair DINOPAY app and start saving as much as $0.10 or more per gallon on your next fill-up. ( www.sinclairoil.com/customers )
( www.allTFL.com ) Check out our new spot to find ALL our TFLstudios content, from news to videos and our podcasts! Does the New 2024 Toyota Tacoma's Massive Chin Spoiler Actually Do Anything? We Put It to the Test on our Denver fuel efficiency loop.
( / tflcar ) Visit our Patreon page to support the TFL team!
0:00 Intro
2:06 Loop1 with Chin
8:35 Interior Sound Level Test
9:30 Loop1 Result
11:33 Chin Removal
13:56 Loop2 without Chin
17:37 Verdict
Watch more videos from TFL Studios:
The Fast Lane Truck ( / tfltruck )
The Fast Lane Car ( / tflcar )
TFLoffroad ( / tfloffroad )
TFLbike ( / tflbike )
TFLnow ( / tflnow )
TFLclassics ( / tflclassics )
TFLtalk ( / tfltalk )
TFL Podcasts:
TFL Talkin' Cars Podcast ( redcircle.com/shows/tfltalk-c... )
TFL Talkin' Trucks Podcast ( redcircle.com/shows/tfl-talki... )
#toyota #tacoma #mpg - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
It's about a 3% improvement in fuel efficiency with the chin spoiler. For a few bucks worth of hardware, that's actually a really significant improvement from an engineering perspective.
After this the design department walked into the engineering department armed with axes, swords and maces.
@JonBecker81 A designer is like an engineer but with a lower IQ.
True. ugly AF tho Better to not buy a truck and get a Prius, Corolla or Camry Hybrid instead
I would suggest prolonged testing to confirm, but that would only be 2.9% difference. If you did 15k per year at 23mpg, with gas at $3/gal, it would amount to less than $60 per year. I agree, ditch that ugly thing.
if you assume a 2% margin of error it's too close to tell. they would need to run this test several times to confirm the results.
It might change dramatically in just 5 years. Or in California it can be more expensive right now.
Agree. Would ditch it. 2-3% improvement is not enough to offset the ugly factor, and it IS ugly
That's also assuming the aerodynamic drag of running at 75mph for the entire 15k. The difference will be even less at lower speeds (city or small country back road). Yeah, definitely chuck it.
I’d pay 60 a year just for it to be gone 😅 it’s like larger tires or other things as well. They cost more but they look better 👍
After years of openly joking about his own chin, it turns out Jay Leno is secretly enjoying a 3% aerodynamic advantage.
Yeah, but massively reduced his stability and appearance. Is it really worth it to have that big of a chin?
Best comment of this year so far 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I don't know why I keep watching these tacoma videos cause I can't afford a $700/month payment for 6 years. Too bad Toyota went crazy with their profits margins on these new ones.
Yep. How bout that new Gmc Canyon AT4 AEV that is showing a sticker of $ 67000 plus all the taxes and dealer fees?
With current interest rates for most buyers that would be a 100k mid size truck time it is paid off. Nuts.
Exactly, is so expensive! I can’t even afford a Maverick lol they are up there too. I guess I won’t be able to drive a truck for a while.
@@deweysturgill6220yeah not worth it because by the tike itd paid pff and it cost you that much you will get way less back after selling it as a depriciated asset
For the user the spoiler is just about insignificant; for the manufacturer it makes EPA sense. It sure 'looks' better sans spoiler.
Yep, when manufacturers have to meet CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) standards, even tenths of a MPG matter.
Bingo
@@dundonrl100000% facts man
@@dundonrl yep.
Absolutely. They can bolt whatever crap on they want to “meet” that garbage. I don’t mind taking an hour to take it all off, just make it easy.
Most people are gonna end up ripping that chin spoiler off….just in use…parking curbs, snow , and even mild off roading..
That is what I was thinking as well. I live in northern Wisconsin and am often driving in snow. I can't imagine that thing would last long.
All I can think is Toyota put it on there knowing that everyone will take them off. It was for advertising they can see "Tacoma gets "x" mpg. @@Cocky.Rooster
Agreed, and i belive it mostly comes on the limited so most wont even have it to begin with..
Doubt that people would take it off…
@@danielrn133with a little extra bracing you could use it to plow your driveway.
I wonder if Toyota will open up a recycling place for all of the spoilers people want to get rid of?
😅😂
Nope, pay to get rid of it
Sad thing is that it probably adds 2-300 dollars for something every one, except old men, will remove on day one.
@@-B_G- a bit of plastic and 8? bolts costs toyota probably $8 in material
@@theTealStory - and probably adds 2-300$ to the price tag at the dealer. I’m not concerned with what it costs Toyota, I’m concerned about how much it costs the customer
Nathan’s quick witted one liners are the best. If you’re not paying attention you can miss some really funny ones.
3:24 “Do we have to pay to stare at it?” Referring to all the absolute asinine “subscriptions” manufacturers are making up that customers have to pay to use standard vehicle features.
And he said the Toyota engineer wanted to give him a hug.
And when he said oh it’s got cruise control because some don’t..meaning Andrea Colorado that came without cruise control lol
@dwreckd1836 how is that even mildly humorous? He optioned his truck without cruise control. I've driven for decades and have never once used cruise control.
You seem to have missed the running joke my friend. It’s funny because Andrea DIDNT KNOW it would come without cruise control and that Mr truck and even Tommy have razzed on him about it. Also funny that for the price he paid for the truck that it didn’t come standard. Sorry you didn’t know the running joke on their vids…but maybe talk to a proctologist about how easily you’re butt hurt
Tires make a huge difference. My 21 Ridgeline was averaging 24 to 26 on the stock Firestone highway tires. 56000 miles I put on contential all terrain contact stock size and lost 3 to 4 miles per gallon
Maybe the weight of the tires?
Maybe the weight of the tires?
Absolutely. I lost 2mpg on my 4Runner going from nice road radial to Wildpeak ATW3.
@@wolfeadventuresthose wildpeaks are incredibly heavy. I had them on my last truck and even though they were awesome they were like 8 pounds heavier than other all terrains.
I have a 2.0L 4cyl BiTDI VW amarok and it loses about 6mpg when I switch from hwy terrain to mud terrain tires, but I do increase diameter a bit.
Toyota was definitely right about how easy and fast it was to take off that chin which is nice. Pretty straightforward to just slap it on if you’re doing very long distance trips where you know you’re not going places that ground clearance is needed.
I had a 2015 Canyon and had to use an angle grinder to remove the chin because the bolts were inserted top to bottom so it was impossible to unbolt even though they claimed it was 'removable'
Exactly take it off for around town and off-road, and slap that ugly thing on there when I take my 2000 mile summer vacation 👍
@@Argedislol. It might have been a bit more tedious but it’s definitely possible if you had some patience.
@@ALMX5DP Nope, No way to access the bolts without removing the entire bumper.
It was bolted from inside the bumper top to bottom. You only had access to the bottom of the screws. (which I cut off)
I could have used a dremel cut off wheel but the angle grinder worked fine. Came off in a few minutes
@@Argedis I just pulled up a YT video which managed. Seemed alright to me.
Gents you need to do this test at sea level. Air density is less at 5,000 ft. elevation. You’ll likely experience a greater difference in more dense air.
Great comment!
But my vehicle will rust next to the water
Thanks for the testing! Appreciate your time and money spent.
I wonder if the mpg difference would be greater at sea level vs your elevation because of the difference in air density? In any event the numbers are pretty respectable considering the passenger load and that the Limited has a some extra weight power running boards etc. Thanks for doing this test!
TFL should take a vacation trip to Florida and run the same test at sea level haha
I agree, plus you have a lead foot driver and highway speeds of 70+ which is typical in their testing.
The miles per gallon would change but the difference would not. As the air would equally apply drag to both tests
Not really, I take trips to Colorado and generally get the same or better mpg.
@@matt45540the aerodynamic deficiencies would actually get amplified as you get faster or drive in more dense air; so the gap would likely increase in percentage...
In the olden days, on the 82+ Firebirds and 84+ Corvettes, if the owner complained about overheating while driving, it's because they lost their chin spoiler somewhere. That spoiler guided airflow into the radiator while at speed since there was no grille for the fire breathing (for its time) V-8.
Gotta love a less reliable turbo 4cyl with useless extra power, similar mpg, for a lot more money lol.
Thank you for taking that thing off!!! Great video as always guys!!!
Sometimes chin spoilers are there to create an air differential for the radiator so more air flows through the radiator, increasing its effectiveness in cooling.
That's not so in this case.
I would remove that thing before leaving the dealership and throw it in their dumpster.
Friggin awesome idea!
"and removing this was especially easy for me" *holding the timer* XD
You guys are awesome
Good video guys. I did a similar test on a 2019 Chevy Colorado Z71 I had (one of my fav cars I ever owned) and had similar results. Only lost little over .5 mpg when I removed the air dam/skirt. I enjoyed the extra clearance so I was good with it.
Nearly 3 percent isn’t too bad of a gain, and it probably gives better gains at higher speeds. If you’re off-roading it seems a lot better to just take it off and you wouldn’t be losing much
Probs make a bigger diff on long high speed driving so if do a lot of long freeway journeys might make sense.
Looks so much better with it off!
Good job love you guys ( ty Ron
When he popped the hood I literally laughed a little. Looks like someone dropped a massive pot of spaghetti noodles all over the engine. What a nightmare 😂
Perhaps that's part of the reason why those plastic covers over the engine were put into place years ago, which everyone seems to scoff at, so now the manufacturers have been not putting them on and the result looks ugly.
Hopefully a pre-production problem
That’s what a lot of engine bays look like now. Emissions and turbo hardware combined seems messy
Planned obsolescence
Don't look at the new Ford Maverick - you might have a heart attack.
How about the rear view mirror that is by camera because Cole would be in the view. Think of this have we lost what a truck was, quiet? Radio, windows open, and feeling the environment but I get it as a grocery getter, lol!
thanks very helpful
A good question! 👍
Thank you for doing this! I wonder if a skid plate or even a small spoiler would still provide some benefit without being so ugly? The truck looks SO much better without it, but I completely understand why Toyota added it.
Shocked that the way Nathan pinches pennies he would not lot to leave the chin spoiler on. No telling what he could do with all that saved gas money.
Thank yall, this was exactly what I was looking for to see how much difference with that that spoiler on mpg.
I find my tonneau cover helps with mpg more than an air dam. At least Toyota made it easy to remove. If they really wanted to help mpg without giving up the looks, they could include a soft tonneau cover on the bed. I think customers would appreciate it given the asking price of new trucks. And if the customer wants to upgrade the cover they could or if they don’t want it they could remove it.
Looking forward to seeing the new tfl tacoma.
Great video Andre & Nathan
The important question is: does the chin spoiler make the exhaust sound better, because that seems to be the most important aspect of any truck for TFL?
As always great job on the testing.
I remember on the white Ram "Stubby" the chin spoiler made a huge difference, so I was expecting the same on this one.
But with such little savings that would be the 1st thing for me.
To me it makes the truck look so bad I would probably take it off right after signing papers.
Straight to the trash. Probably before the truck got home
I remember the extending the towing mirrors on stubby resulted in reducing the mpg by 6. It went from like 24mpg to 18mpg or something.
I don't remember that one being so plow like. It seems like in order to make this chin spoiler easier to remove, they also made it look cheap, tacked on, and less effective.
Makes you wonder how much you could gain by getting rid of the sidemirers altogether.
@@johnhoover7869
Yes, I think eventually side mirrors will be replaced with little tiny cameras on the doors.
great video guys....good to see this data! .7mpg is a lot of fuel over time!
Great video. Keep it up. Really enjoy these real world tests. I had a work truck, a 2015 F150 V-8, that I used to travel with extensively. I took off what they called the air dam because I drove in rural roads with lots of snow and it would plow up on the front. However most was on highway. I never noticed a change in fuel consumption.
So I’ve come to conclude these air dams or chin spoiler as you call it don’t make much difference in fuel consumption
Remember that the air density at that altitude means less drag, so it would benefit those at sea level more (though I don’t know by how much)
still taking it off lol
I live at 4k+ elevation and notice 5 to 10% better fuel mileage at elevation. I'd think that this should somewhat correlate with the 3% power loss per 1k of elevation.
I get an average of 15.2 mpg with my Tundra 1794, so if you're getting 23 mpg that's really good. I love my Tundra, though. What I want Toyota to make is this: Tundra or Tacoma with a diesel engine, six seater, manual transmission with paddle shifters, at least a five foot bed, and good rear legroom-My Tundra Crewmax has insane legroom.
Manual transmission with paddle shifters...!? That is an oxymoron... surely you mean a DCT?
You do!! Real world testing 😊
The day I got home with my brand new 2018 Silverado z71 I pulled off the plastic chin spoiler and never looked back. Unless it saved me 5 mpg it wasn’t staying on my truck. So glad my 2023 Ram Rebel didn’t come with one at all.
Ty for making this happen. great vid.
gotta be honest with full size trucks coming close to these numbers and in similar price point as this limited i would personally go for the less packaged more capable fullsize instead of the smaller taco ...
guess part of the reason this segment faded was cause it couldn't do enough to justify itself over fullsize trucks
Some people just dont want to be driving a studio sized apartment around town or off road and have the ability to fit their vehicle in their garage. Theres pros and cons to everything in life you just have to pick what suits your needs best.
2023 limited V6: 19-24 mpg
2024 limited i4: 20-23 mpg
And now we know roughly 1 mpg is from the spoiler...
If they offered a 2024 truck with the new transmission, interior, suspension, etc, but with the old trusted V6, who isn't choosing that?
The hybrid had better be pretty impressive
This is absolutely hilarious! What a dumb situation. Everyone is going to remove this thing and they wind up in the landfill. Great work, EPA!
Wow! And I thought the air dam on my 2020 F250 was huge. Tacoma said hold my beer. 😂
I wish Toyota came back with the 22RE-T with updated electronics.
It would last to long and people would stop trading in their cars
I'm a Toyot fan. Had 2 Tundras up to last year. I don't like the direction that Toyota is going with Tundra and Tacoma. Not significant upgrades and in general the new platforms don't seem as reliable. Time will tell i guess
I have tried TFL gas technique and noted two things. Foam subsides very fast at my elevation, 30 seconds more than sufficient. Second, the amount for second top off can vary based upon flow rate. Low flow rate gasoline allows higher fill level. Did not appear nozzle depressed same amount.
great content
Yeah I will choose way better looks over just a 3% improvement in mpg, and a Tonneau cover for the bed would probably get back that 3%
Actually increasing tire pressure even just a tiny bit, a few PSI, can easily increase MPG by 3% or more. Pro tip there for everyone, but dont increase your PSI too much and check recommendations and do your research. Off-roading decrease PSI, but generally not below 20.
I removed the front air dam on my F150 after getting stuck in the snow when the air dam acted as a snow anchor.
In doing so, I lost 2 mpg on the highway, however, I also noticed the truck was less stable at speed and could feel some turbulence pushing the truck around side to side.
Same 2 mpg loss for me on my F150 but no change in driving dynamics after spoiler removal.
I left mine on, if I hit a rock with it it's a warning to be careful and not let it hit my oil pan or trans pan.
@@volvo09 in dry conditions, it's no problem, I agree good to hear the warning with it rather than hit the oil pan. The issue is in snow, when snow gets deep it first acts as a snow blow, then when you back up, it scoops snow up and into the front bumper leaving you immensely stuck.
The Dino the dinosaur. I remember those billboards from the back of a station wagon. I had a flashback. ... I have a 23 Tacoma. When my spoiler falls off I will be happy with that
good test
The difference may be larger at sea level. The air is fairly thin where you guys are.
If there's a 2% improvement there would still be a 2% improvement just the actual miles per gallon would be different
^ so...
The difference is an environment where aero effects are *more pronounced*, versus an environment where aero doesn’t help as much (high altitude Colorado).
Ergo, the difference (2-3%) widens differentially. It’s still a matter of testing whether the difference changes to 2.5-3.5% (negligible), or if the difference widens meaningfully... which is subjective, but if it approaches 5-6% difference, there are probably people who would keep it.
Personal note, I’d eat the 5-6% difference and remove the chin myself lol
I would definitely remove it. It goes way too low and would just get curbed by someone. For less than 1mpg it really is not worth it.
oh joy safety features !
And yeah I had to put seat jackers to raise the front of the seat on my 2020
Fully agree with bad looks for factory extra large spoiler, however a spoiler about half as low, should help with efficiency and might even improve looks, as it does on other vehicles.
Maybe a smaller aftermarket version will be available eventually.
I noticed the chin spoiler had 2 big rectangular holes in the front of it. If the holes were covered would it make a bigger difference?
Those to holes could be a vortex generator to accerate the air underbody not sure were exactly they redirect the vortex my guess for the front wheel
then people would complain about no access to the recovery hooks (or loops in this case)
Wonder if you blocked the holes if the MPG’s would increase.
This is not how aerodynamics work.
I guess it depends on which holes. 😃
@@is6566 where the tow hooks are.
Ahh, that hole! 😍
@@ReinhardSchusterthat’s exactly how aerodynamics work. That front air dam is essentially plugging the “hole” that is the underside of the truck.
Thanks guys! My son removed removed the spoiler on my F-150 and I have wondered how much of a difference that makes.
Look at this monstrosity of a damn! Toyota you blew it!
With or without the chin I am pretty happy with those numbers. If the hybrid can add 2 or 3 mpg to that then Toyota will really have something.
The 4 cylinder engines are supposed to be more fuel efficient than a 6 or 8 cylinder. But John at LHT Performance put a V8 from a Silverado into his 2020 Colorado, and he gets 28 MPG on the highway. Why spend so much money for a 4 cylinder or a hybrid when the fuel economy is worse than a V8.
@@aerynlovell4754yup. I imagine a Tacoma with a v8 would be very decent mpg
@@aerynlovell4754 It's more that smaller engines have lower emissions, that's what the Government is pushing for.
That being said V8s always got good highway mileage, it's when you're putting around town that it drops like a rock. I had a Grand Cherokee with the 5.7 and the ZF 8-speed. Even with cylinder deactivation best I cold get was 15 mpg. Even my Camaro only gets 18.
@DragonKnightX12 John at LHT Performance used the V8 from a 2020 Silverado and a 6-speed automatic transmission. It still has the factory catalytic converter. He doesn't like heavily modified vehicles for a daily driver. It is what he calls OEM Plus, meaning it complies with emission standards, is quiet (no drone), but has more horsepower and better fuel efficiency. An engine is a giant air pump, so if you remove the restrictive stock air intake and exhaust and replace them with a free flowing aftermarket intake/exhaust, then you get better gas milage.
@@aerynlovell4754 has there been updates on that? I think the fuel economy was just based off a first drive using the onboard display (with no real accessories hooked up yet). I'd be interested to see if he has a follow up where he actually calculated it with everything working.
That air dam wont last long off roading.
Going to be taking mine off immediately!
I drive a Crosstrek, but am in the process of buying a new house, so I'm planning on getting a truck once my car is paid off... and this new Taco is looking really good!
I'm literally in the same situation 🙃
Drive a crosstrek
Want a tacoma
But also saving up for a house 😅
Does the air dam reduce noice or improve ride quality in any way?
No
How do you know? Just curious what your source is. @@robertyoung8289
I wonder if the energy and material to develop and produce the chin will outweigh MPG benefit.
Haha, agree, like the fact it takes about 2.5 bottles of water to produce 1 plastic water bottle
I like Nathan straight forwardness
Thanks for the informational content! Seeing your faces instead of the back of your heads would make the video even better! 😉
“J” VIN Toyotas are the best of the best.
This isn't a j Vin car
@@Mr-pn2ehi think that's the point they're trying to make
Id like to see the difference the chin spoiler would make towing an enclosed trailer
Tacoma towing lol
I don't think it effects the tow capacity
@@thenutsonyourchin well I believe the Tundra's power deploying airdam does stay up when it recognizes a trailer attached. So my guess is there is some effect, depending on the overall vehicle or frontend design when towing or not.
Might affect cooking efficiency when towing (or under any load)?
I could see owning a set of oversized all-terrain 3PMSF, and running them in winter and offroad without the air dam, then having a set of OE size highway tread tires to use with the air dam for daily driving and highway trips/towing. The combined difference would probably be 5-10% MPG, enough to pay for the extra set of tires/rims after many years.
I remember this test on TFL truck with a Ram 1500 and it made a significant difference in fuel mileage. I’m surprised the results aren’t similar here
Smaller loop, colder, air being less dense
I suspect that the dash mpg is calculated with tires at 50% tread depth. (Revolutions/Mile)
But what if you can’t find your 10 mm socket?
Every Jeep Wrangler and Gladiator include a little tool kit with a ratchet and bits to remove the doors and hardtop and fold the windshield. Toyota should include a ratchet for the chin spoiler.
My ecoboost runs 87 Recommended 2.0 Liter - a lot of NA engines require premium fuel these days as well
Here we go!! 😮
This truck looks soooooooooooooooo much better without the Jay-Leno-Chin on the front..
87 octane in a forced induction engine seems wrong to me. I know Toyota says it's fine but I am wondering if premium would result in better power and mpg.
@@carbonking53 higher octane won’t produce more power. It will produce as advertised only. Lower octane will produce way less performance than advertised.
@@AntilleanConfederation Actually modern turbo engines will tune up when they detect higher octane fuel being put. Even Subarus do it.
@@carbonking53 I agree and understand. My wife drives a Mazda CX-5 Turbo and Mazda states you can run it on 87 but you will get more power and MPG with premium. Her car has never seen a tank of anything but premium since the original dealer fill up of which I assume was regular.
@@DragonKnightX12 tune up to the factory tune for 93 yes. But it won’t make more power past that.
Let's be real, 57 miles isn't anywhere near long enough to get an accurate idea of the actual MPG. Either way, I wouldn't care if I got 5 MPG less, I would remove that front chin before I drove it off the lot.
Yeah, far too short of a test without using a fuel cell.
It's for the Toyota fleet fuel efficiency numbers (only )
I did a track day in my Volvo v60 cross country on Primacy's when my Mini broke down. Scubbed the script of the side wall lol but didnt hold up too badly.
The chin would make since if it could get you 1-2 mpg extra.
Well it got 0.7mpg, that's not far off the 1mpg you mention...
@boostav I stated 1-2mpg, meaning over 1mpg.
@thenutsonyourchin A chin guard on this will never be able to create enough wind deflection to save 5mpg. Not even a completely different front end with a low drag design would save 5mpg.
I love Nathan!!! Said just what I was going to say. "COMPLETE BS," I'll take it off. Great truck and will still dominate..
You two are hilarious together
Can't wait to see an mpg test on the hybrid Tacoma.
Is no one upset that it only gets 24 mpg. That is awful. You can get a F-150 that gets that or better and it’s bigger and quicker.
You’re lucky to get 20 in an F150 and it’s no quicker. Being bigger is not a selling point. It won’t fit in parking spaces or garages so it’s basically useless.
F150 has trucks with sub 6 second zero to 60....@@user-tb7rn1il3q
“ (F150) won’t fit in parking spaces or garages so it’s basically useless.”
$hit. Nobody told me that my F150 was useless because it didn’t fit into parking spaces. I though after driving it 80,000+ miles that it fit into parking spaces pretty well. It also fits my garage. Definitely didn’t seem to be useless when hauling construction material in the bed or demo debris to the dump or when I was camping for months out of the camper in the back in state forests. Thanks for letting me know. I will get rid of that junk immediately and replace it with a new 5-foot bed midsize truck so finally I will have a useful truck. Originally I just wanted to add a Tacoma to the fleet but you opened my eyes. I should just dump that useless F150.
@@carbonking53 Most people aren't commuting 90% highway tho. Look up on Fuelly the avg for the 2.7 is around 18, only 1 mpg more than the 5.0.
Definitely blitz the Taco, and it's coming too the new Ranger.
@@carbonking53 The truck mileage computer is optimistic. Try parking in a garage that’s 18 feet deep. I’m not removing snow and ice in the winter. Acceleration is limited by traction. A pickup with little weight in the rear is not accelerating very fast.
24.06 mpg with chin spoiler
23.36 mpg without
Lolololol.
For my Tacoma,. Wind can make a big difference ... even a few miles per hour head wind seems to have an equal amount of speed reduction when my little truck is loaded
Thanks! Great test! Inquiring minds wanted to know!
You're cruising around at 75mph. You're never going to get good gas mileage at that speed.
I have. 🤷♂️
@@JohnDoe-nz6bk Is it the exact same truck as shown in the video? As in 100% exactly? Same town? Same distance? Same elevation? The answer is NO. Your anecdotal evidence is MEANINGLESS at best and useless since there's multiple factors at play here.
@@MustangFord no, with a hemi. With a 6.7 diesel. With a 4.0 in a 2018 4 runner. The mpg between 60-75 mph is a negligible difference.
@@JohnDoe-nz6bk So we are in agreement that your arbitrary "tests" are INVALID because THOSE VEHICLES ARE NOT BEING TESTED ON THIS VIDEO. Great to know.
The MPG at 60 vs 75 is definitely NOT a negligible difference. I just did a test drive of 2,600 mile’s keeping my HD diesel truck running at 65 MPH vs the usual 75 MPH that I drive on same route and I got 20.5 MPG vs the usual 16 MPG. And that’s over 2,600 miles. No towing just the truck. The difference would be even bigger for keeping the truck at 60 MPH.
If I were to ever cave in and buy a Toyota ...shudder... I would definitely remove that chin🗿
Everyone will be removing the chin one way or another.
Manufactures are taking there time adding a rear view camera display I had one in a ram limited very cool.
I wish more manufacturers would copy Ram and use a retractable chin spoiler that only deploys over ~45mph
After owning the vehicle for 50K miles thats a lot of gas saved. Of course its not going to be significant in this scenario. The point is that IT WORKS.
It’s like 60 bucks a year. Basically nothing saved at all.
@@devengudinas1649 That's a lot of gas saved and less emissions that are spread when you consider potentially thousands of these trucks will be on the road... It not always about you.
@@MustangFordJesus Christ. Do you think the tiny bit of emissions saved from this makes even the slightest dent in the world’s emissions? China is building multiple coal plants every single year. The emissions saved if every single driver in America did this would make zero difference. You’re not special. You’re not saving the world. Climate change is a joke, it’s made up by professors and lobbyists to receive billions in government grant money. The oceans are not rising. I can’t believe people fall for this. I’m sure you believe that electric cars will save the world too huh?
@@MustangFordoh good god! 🤦♂️
@@JohnDoe-nz6bk That's exactly right, you have zero points to make with zero facts to back anything up.
They should lose the digital instrument cluster. It will be an expensive fix when it fails
I have a '19 Ranger, and highway I get close to 23-24 mpg on highway driving. Avg town/city is 20-21. I use 88/E15 for mine.
I'm glad they made it easy to remove. Happy New Year all
There is no way I would ever get a Tacoma with a 4 cylinder I love my Tacoma 2005 with a real V6 HELL YA. And Turbos only last about 100 thousand miles and yes, I will knock it even if I try it
and the rear bumper with the drop-down tow hitch I dont like that I hope they put rear disk brake on it but that wont matter to me now that it has a 4 cylinder not all changers are good ones, I wont a V6 with turbos?????? or not??????? Sad Days for us Tacoma lovers :( :( you take so much wait of the bed that you will have even more problems sliding around when it rains or is wet or Snowy out not to happy with this new Tacoma, I guess my 2005 Tacoma will be my last
VERY surprised to see a Toyota owner claiming that turbos only last 100,000 miles. My last diesel was an 02 Ford Powerstroke and it has over 400,000 on the original factory turbo. It was working fine when I sold it at 289,000 miles, and the current owner is over 400K with no problems. That’s with a Ford !!! Are you telling me that a Toyota can’t at least approximate that level of reliability ?!?! I get the loyalty to your V6, I’m still driving a Toyota truck with a 4.7 and haven’t gotten a new one despite the almost 300,000 miles on it because it still runs great. I’m considering the purchase of a Taco for runabout daily driver use, and from every comparison I’ve seen this new 4 cylinder turbo absolutely SMOKES the older V6. It gets better mpg, makes more power, makes a LOT more torque and at lower rpm. I’m thinking if you limit yourself to your 06 Taco then you’ll be missing out on upgrades done before the change, AND the potential of the new truck. That’s a choice only you can make for yourself, good luck !
Semi trucks can put a million miles on a turbo without failure. If you think this engine won’t be reliable you don’t know Toyota.. this motor actually exceeded the reliability of the last generation and the turbos reliability is in Toyotas commercial category.
@@skipgumphrey9579diesel is a different animal. Not even comparable!
@@JohnDoe-nz6bk Turbos work the same regardless, and Diesels demand way more. Not only do they run hotter, but they typically are pushing 25-30 psi of boost.
Comparably these gas engines on the stock tune only run boost at 10-12 psi. As long as they use a good quality turbo, it should have no problem.
Which Toyota is claiming they built this engine up to the same standards as their commercial engines.
@@DragonKnightX12 work the same, yes. Built the same, no! Again, completely different animal.
The old truck was better looking and more functional. Turbos add fail potential.
Yes, & very expensive fail point.
I remember back in the mid 80's car companies did the same thing, turbo everything. So just like then maybe this is just another fad.
The old truck desperately needed an engine update.
@@noneyabizz8337 Why do you think that?
It’s definitely not’ ‘80s anymore for turbo engine design.
@@scottyellis3442 very expensive? A new OE turbo for my 2.0T is like $600.. I bet some other ancillaries can be more expensive to replace.
A very effective way to do this is see if you can get another owner out there driving half a mile behind without a spoiler who will drive his with a spoiler on the way back, again, a half a mile behind.
$52,000 top trim, 2 button blanks. Makes total sense.