The problem with contingency fee is Lawyers and Plaintiff scam out of defendant. They forced defendant to settle because defendant can't effort to pay for litigation costs. Contingency fee lawyers should pay for defendant's litigation costs first and get reimbursement if they win.
Contingency fees allow plaintiffs to sue, when 90% of them could never afford it. 65% of a settlement or judgement is better than 100% of $0.
The problem with contingency fee is Lawyers and Plaintiff scam out of defendant. They forced defendant to settle because defendant can't effort to pay for litigation costs. Contingency fee lawyers should pay for defendant's litigation costs first and get reimbursement if they win.
wrong....lots of twisting of facts and WC doctors etc......
Well, even if this is contingency, 40 percent is still a lot.
You don't need an expert in a trip and fall case, our car accident. Only a malpractice, or complicated issues. Tell me I'm lying?
The issue is getting 1. A reasonably knowledgeable person with confidence to take the damn case on.