great talk! I am taking Diffgeo 3 and the two last topics are holonomy theory and YM theory. Obviously YM theory is deeply connected with physics but for holonomy I couldn‘t fathom the applications. I was promised (by chatgpt) that they exist but didn‘t know yet why holonomy is important. The point you‘re making, that a connection theory might be too much structure for physical applications, motivates me and interests me in the topic. Thank you!
beautiful subject, but it's regrettable not to see a intuitive approch to these theories. More than theorem-proof approach which to me it's nice but i'd rather seeing a more visual connection to this.
great talk! I am taking Diffgeo 3 and the two last topics are holonomy theory and YM theory. Obviously YM theory is deeply connected with physics but for holonomy I couldn‘t fathom the applications. I was promised (by chatgpt) that they exist but didn‘t know yet why holonomy is important. The point you‘re making, that a connection theory might be too much structure for physical applications, motivates me and interests me in the topic. Thank you!
beautiful subject, but it's regrettable not to see a intuitive approch to these theories. More than theorem-proof approach which to me it's nice but i'd rather seeing a more visual connection to this.
cool
teaching is not your thing maybe speed reading is