What would you suggest that one should refer to learning advanced gd&t? I really like your videos by the way. Very helpful. Also do you have any discord or other platform where someone can get in touch with you?
HI, Thanks so much! It's not exciting, but the best way to get into the advanced stuff is to read the Y14.5 standard. GD&T Basics offers some virtual live training that I recommend if you are looking for formal training.
The function of this fit of two zylindrical features can be specified with tolerance zone diameter zero at MMC of the derived feature or with a tolerance zone at MMC and an additional reciprocity requirement. If there is no reciprocity at ASME, there is only the solution with tolerance zone zero and an expanded tolerance for the linear size. Please do not give away any tolerances. The suitable datumsystem should be defined by the degrees of freedom, which the two features have in the fit function.
What would you suggest that one should refer to learning advanced gd&t?
I really like your videos by the way. Very helpful. Also do you have any discord or other platform where someone can get in touch with you?
HI, Thanks so much! It's not exciting, but the best way to get into the advanced stuff is to read the Y14.5 standard. GD&T Basics offers some virtual live training that I recommend if you are looking for formal training.
@@RDeanOdell yaa i do follow GD&T Basics. They are really good as well.
And it's there a way to get in touch with you? Thanks.
I can be reached via LinkedIn or my website, a google search of my name will bring you to my site with contact info.
@@RDeanOdell oh. Thank you
Interesting. Never thought about negative VC.
The function of this fit of two zylindrical features can be specified with tolerance zone diameter zero at MMC of the derived feature or with a tolerance zone at MMC and an additional reciprocity requirement. If there is no reciprocity at ASME, there is only the solution with tolerance zone zero and an expanded tolerance for the linear size. Please do not give away any tolerances. The suitable datumsystem should be defined by the degrees of freedom, which the two features have in the fit function.
Confusing AF. I mean all this stuff about gauges