What is a Tariff? How do Tariffs Work?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 413

  • @510tuber
    @510tuber ปีที่แล้ว +185

    I don't know why it's so difficult for most people to simply explain how something works. It's always nice when you finally find a video that puts things in simple terms and doesn't speed through it but also doesn't stretch it out.

    • @bings2867
      @bings2867 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      this is difficult for me honestly, who pays the tarrif?

    • @Thorinoaken
      @Thorinoaken 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      ​@@bings2867 if you put tarrifs on china, americans companies will have to pay, which in turn makes americans pay

    • @bings2867
      @bings2867 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@Thorinoaken thank you i ended up figuring that out yesterday, really took me a bit to find that out.

    • @gankfrombush
      @gankfrombush 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@Thorinoaken I will admit that is true. But it's a way to incentivize domestic production. Unfortunately, we're forced to pay a minimum wage and provide safe working conditions where China can pay slave wages and employ children. Tariffs should be a way to punish them for those practices. They're essentially undercutting our workers as well as keeping wages low.

    • @Entropy106
      @Entropy106 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bings2867maybe you’re just stupid

  • @brianmiller5074
    @brianmiller5074 5 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    I love your explanation I goofed off in school and the way you put it makes perfect sense and very easy to understand. Thanks

  • @IncredibleStan
    @IncredibleStan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    FINALLY!! A video that visually explained this in an easy way

  • @lukemager3519
    @lukemager3519 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +10

    Thank you. I've questions for a long time and this explains everything. The consumer is the one who suffers.

  • @nursyaura6910
    @nursyaura6910 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I’ve been trying to understand what is tariff because of social studies and this video was the best thing i’ve ever watched on youtube! THANK YOU!!

  • @jstrick31907
    @jstrick31907 5 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    You explained this in a professional and very clear manner.

  • @reinajalana
    @reinajalana 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    This was really helpful, thank you. Also, one other piece from how I understand that I think is also crucial to consider: In the original scenario, yes, after the tariffs are implemented, Country A could begin charging customers $15 for that product. OR, what could ALSO happen: Country A isn't able to provide those products (at least not yet, until they decide or figure out a way to provide, which will take time) or its version is far inferior (again, at least for now, until they're able to make their product better) to Country B's, so companies in Country A go on importing and selling products from Country B, but now charge customers $20 to offset the additional cost of the tariffs they have to pay.
    So, either way, the customers in Country A foot the extra bill at the end of the day.
    Anyone feel free to let me know if I have that wrong.

    • @neilmachon9828
      @neilmachon9828 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No you are correct the consumer will pay especially in us (don't deserve capitals). Bigly stupid country

  • @ponzu1759
    @ponzu1759 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    You made it so clear, thank you so much! I have an assignment due on International Trade tomorrow and this was the best explanation

  • @judithmcdaniel7343
    @judithmcdaniel7343 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Very nice presentation. Simple to understand the meaning of Tariffs.

  • @kikikiki8736
    @kikikiki8736 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    OMG thank u so much for this. I didnt play attention in class and I didnt really understand what my teacher was saying so thank u. :)

  • @alexd0617
    @alexd0617 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Now I have a better understanding of how tariffs work. Thanks.

  • @c5-36adhirajjadhav8
    @c5-36adhirajjadhav8 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It was so easy to understand.
    You explained it within 3 minute.

  • @rickybaker42
    @rickybaker42 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    We’re talking about value differences here. Both sides understand tariffs and capitalism.
    My take: if the Chinese price point is only possible due to their slave labor rates, I don’t think we should be validating Chinese factory employers not for altruistic human rights reasons, but because we would need to drop minimum wage to $1.52/hr to stay competitive (I also care about human rights so it’s a win win).
    Furthermore we cannot be allowing other countries to undercut American companies when that opportunity should be going to American competition.
    Lastly, we need to stop pretending that it’s not incredibly destabilizing to shop more and more of our reliance over to countries that are not our friends.

    • @thommanley
      @thommanley 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      While I don’t disagree with any of your points, the problem comes in with the fact that 90% plus of the products that we import from China are not even manufactured here at all by any companies . Also, under our current system which values profits far above people, especially since we’re talking about huge corporations in most cases, slave labor considerations in countries that would undercut our prices are not even considered.

    • @myeshaspeaks1
      @myeshaspeaks1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@thommanleyyou’re correct, that’s why we need to create our own stuff here and not rely on another country who are benefiting to our, and the salve laborers’, detriment

    • @Haley_Halo
      @Haley_Halo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      ​@@myeshaspeaks1In order for us to have more American made things, we have to be able to afford to buy those things personally. Which means our wages must increase to give us buying power (that 60% of us don't have at all) to account for the higher costing items. There's a massive wealth inequality growing larger every year. With 2/3 of the country able to buy less and less, we cannot compete with cheap labor/products. Corporations are making massive profits that get siphoned up top but does not trickle down to the majority working class to maintain a strong stable economy. This problem plays into everything else including obesity and declining birth rates.

    • @StevenVerbruggen
      @StevenVerbruggen 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      + 100% of the tarriffs are payed by the importer and not by the exporter. If the exporter sells DAP or DDP the cost of transport up untill the importers door will be added to the price of the goods. In case of CIF, CFR, FCA (generally all incoterms with C anf F) the importer directly pays all domestic costs. As for EXW shipments the importer pays for everything directly even the exporttaxes in the country of origin. If you have any understanding of global shipping you know that eventually the consumer in the importing country will pay more for everything including domestic cause they can raise Prices to stay competitive. And because they can slap on the domesticly produced label they can even sell over imported Marketplace and people will pay for it to "support" domestic products.

    • @yasmine4754
      @yasmine4754 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@Haley_HaloVery good point!

  • @eyuwang
    @eyuwang 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Nice quick video that explains very clearly about what a tariff is to me

  • @JoeyEnn
    @JoeyEnn หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    End result still raises prices. To those who were concerned about rising costs.

  • @johnzarznia6814
    @johnzarznia6814 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Solid presentation, you explained tariffs well

    • @LearntoInvest
      @LearntoInvest  6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      As always John, I appreciate you sticking with me. I've got more videos coming out later this week.

    • @johnzarznia6814
      @johnzarznia6814 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I look forward to seeing them.

  • @babychubs4346
    @babychubs4346 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    How does this video only have 15 likes it explains it so well and was very helpful!

    • @LearntoInvest
      @LearntoInvest  6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thanks, I really appreciate that! 😀

  • @wolfguardian2293
    @wolfguardian2293 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Thank for explaining! This so relevant at the moment. And I was getting a little confused but I think I have a little bit of a better understanding now

  • @woahtherr5371
    @woahtherr5371 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    finally came across a video that taught me what I was seeking to learn. Thank you!!

  • @alparslankorkmaz2964
    @alparslankorkmaz2964 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Nicely explained.

  • @GavStaR79
    @GavStaR79 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

    So basically the end user is either screwed internationally or domestically.

  • @davidclouston34
    @davidclouston34 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I really like your explanation. 🙏 It helped me understand tariffs

  • @Here2Enjoy-b8z
    @Here2Enjoy-b8z 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Another big problem is, country A would increase price to $18 unnecessarily too on top of no innovation

  • @mr.umbrella3979
    @mr.umbrella3979 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is such a great explanation!

  • @ruslansayfullin6194
    @ruslansayfullin6194 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It was clear and easy to understand, thank you for the lesson.

  • @charlieharrison7234
    @charlieharrison7234 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for giving me a clear understanding...i think I get it

    • @LearntoInvest
      @LearntoInvest  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      :) any questions... Fire them my way, I'm always happy to help :) thanks for the support

  • @jakehoffman9115
    @jakehoffman9115 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great, simplified explanation!

  • @jasonchu4400
    @jasonchu4400 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    doode that was good it was throughly explain with visual graphics it’s 10x any classes or schooling bro

  • @phoenixblack1220
    @phoenixblack1220 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation! Thank you.

  • @philam1973
    @philam1973 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Where does the $5 come from? Or go to? Done at the port of entry? At the distributor? At the final retailer? I know it adds $5 to each unit at the end but where does it start and how imposed?

    • @joborison9764
      @joborison9764 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      The people importing the item from B pay the 5 to the government A. Then the price of the item from country B for the importer to buy is essentially $15 ($10 to country B+$5 to government A). In order for them to sell it for a profit they need to add their mark up to it so goods from country B wouldn’t be priced at $15 like the item from country A they would be priced at say $16. Then country A producers think well if people are still buying them at 16 I guess then we can charge that too. So the price of the goods you bought for $13 before tariffs came would initially increase due to the tariffs, and then have a secondary increase due to a lack of competitiveness that normally helps to drive prices downwards. So you used to pay $13 and now you pay 16 plus you just triggered a trade war so all your prices go up. And don’t forget the sales tax on top of those increases. Sale tax is a percentage so you pay more on a 16 dollar item than you did on the 13 dollar item.

    • @Kenny-Ross
      @Kenny-Ross 3 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      Great questions. I'm asking myself the same questions.

  • @TheFaso95
    @TheFaso95 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You’re better at explaining than most college professors

  • @MrEchskech
    @MrEchskech 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +270

    Who's here after listening to Trump's half-baked idea for saving America?

    • @Que11282
      @Que11282 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    • @ThinkingCap_
      @ThinkingCap_ 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +83

      So his idea is half-baked but you had to go to a youtube channel in order to learn what a tariff even is? Interesting bro

    • @lukejones8365
      @lukejones8365 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

      ​@@ThinkingCap_dont discourage people from fact checking, thats how we elect liars.

    • @Annexation_
      @Annexation_ 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ThinkingCap_ So people just shouldnt learn and educate themselves and blindly elect a tyrant who doesnt even know how his own economic policies would work?
      Interesting bro.

    • @JayLor564
      @JayLor564 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@lukejones8365im telling you man

  • @markjohnson7041
    @markjohnson7041 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    U still gotta dumb it down a bit for the Trumpers to understand 😂😂😂

    • @kalebyoung4443
      @kalebyoung4443 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      it says pretty clearly at the beginning, “to protect domestic product” and with the strategy of lowering taxes for independent businesses down to 15%, its making manufacturing competitive for being in the US. Thus creating jobs.. along with the deregulation in many areas, like energy. Making us, again, competitive in another market, and adding jobs with lowering the price of energy for the citizens. It’s a strategic move that allows us to actually attack the debt and enhance the worth of the dollar.

  • @nortnort4776
    @nortnort4776 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The way you ended this video is so important
    Find the information on the topic youre looking into and come up with your own conclusion
    Media feeds us talking points of each side nowadays instead of just presenting the facts and letting us think for ourselves

  • @Rick-np9vz
    @Rick-np9vz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    No matter what spin is put on it!
    Consumers always lose in trade wars!

  • @norfolkbulldogs8602
    @norfolkbulldogs8602 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Loving your channel. Thanks

  • @MrLumberjackz
    @MrLumberjackz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    An interesting note for americans: the scenario explained the US company was losing money. For the most part this is untrue about the vast majority of businesses. Most have seen record profits...and continue to raise prices...then boasting record profits next year...

  • @mariewright9969
    @mariewright9969 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi can I use this video for internal training? Please reply to me within 7 days? Thank you

  • @BananaBossYT
    @BananaBossYT 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Please show this to every MAGAt you know

    • @Brokenhill42
      @Brokenhill42 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Trump and Harris both proposed policies that are bad for free markets. Kamala's rent-ceiling idea is arguably worse. Tariffs against enemy countries seem reasonable to me if they're not too extreme. They hurt in the short-term but in the long-term if it pushes America to manufacture more goods at a lower cost then progress is made.
      We'll have to see, but if Trump can improve taxes and de-regulate then that may save americans more money than they would be losing to a tariff so it may be a net win.

    • @davido1953
      @davido1953 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      how is it that Lefties understand tariffs but don't understand how printing money affects inflation, how DEI weakens products and services, how drag queen story hours undermine parents, how abortion makes life cheap, how control of the media creates distrust of the gov't, how unconstrained immigration causes prices of housing to skyrocket, sows chaos in courts and threatens the security of every American...how do they not understand all that?

    • @aries4378
      @aries4378 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@davido1953Nothing you said is true nor relevant to the topic at hand. MAGAT.

    • @davido1953
      @davido1953 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@aries4378 lol

    • @BTonTV
      @BTonTV 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@aries4378 you know those guys don't use logic and reason. They just wear red hats spout nonsense 🙄..

  • @lailac8964
    @lailac8964 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pls do what is job argument. Thank you

  • @Rebecca-zr3lu
    @Rebecca-zr3lu 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    God, thank you for your wisdom and love and guidance over all costs and productions in Jesus name. Amen 🙏

  • @jgatchaljgatchal8350
    @jgatchaljgatchal8350 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It's more secure for domestic producers but more expensive for consumers.

  • @johnmckay2486
    @johnmckay2486 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    He didn't mention how country b has slave labor and can produce things super cheap. Buy from country b supports slave labor child labor. Also country a has union and has t9 pay good wages which makes it hard to lower costs.

    • @neilmachon9828
      @neilmachon9828 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I take it that us doesn't have slaves mmmmn I don't believe that

    • @neilmachon9828
      @neilmachon9828 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When trump takes power there won't be any unions..no collective bargaining because you believe musk a al will protect you.... think again he might be rich but he really is dumb...son of a poor father... don't think so

    • @funnygum1
      @funnygum1 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@neilmachon9828 under paid slaves

  • @jdwrcc
    @jdwrcc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    Maybe Kamala should have presented this short video throughout her campaign instead having a concert with all those celebrities with bad images on themselves right now but it probably wouldn’t matter because trump would of said she’s lying and they would have believed it

    • @truthhurtsdontit
      @truthhurtsdontit 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      She did. Where the hell were you?

    • @BTonTV
      @BTonTV 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah, you clearly weren't paying attention. People not paying attention is why she lost, not Beyonce.

    • @mariocervantes8101
      @mariocervantes8101 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It would be really great if people like you would not vote ever. 2019 Trump was going to impose Tariff's on Mexico if they didn't comply to his demands. Mexico bowed. You should just stick to multicolored flags, and different pronouns fight.

    • @truthhurtsdontit
      @truthhurtsdontit 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@mariocervantes8101just like Mexico was going to pay for the wall huh. Did you even know is how tariffs work?

    • @mariocervantes8101
      @mariocervantes8101 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@truthhurtsdontit Hahaha you're still with the wall hahaha. Trump got them to bow in 2019, and it's documented. Just do like you did his four years last time, drop to your knees and yell at the sky with tears rolling down your face every single day. Provide the comedy.

  • @UnwantedIrvine
    @UnwantedIrvine 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @bamufrmda0
    @bamufrmda0 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good video

  • @mariacleary5769
    @mariacleary5769 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What software tool was used to create a video like this?

    • @LearntoInvest
      @LearntoInvest  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I used a software called videoscribe

    • @mariacleary5769
      @mariacleary5769 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LearntoInvest Thanks!

  • @andrewbroome5752
    @andrewbroome5752 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Tariffs protect consumers from lower prices. Copper from China and copper from Argentina is still copper. If China can make it cheaper, that's good, cause everyone can buy it at a list price.
    The thing that I never understood was the complaining about counties "dumping" goods. No business is just sending free stuff , there is always a buyer..
    Unilateral free trade should be the US policy.

  • @mannsolo6294
    @mannsolo6294 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No decision ever made in business is for the consumers benefit...

  • @Kraidismyspiritanimal
    @Kraidismyspiritanimal 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    And they're only IF country A does business directly with county B. For example, there is a traffic on Chinese steel, but it is imported by an American company. The company buys its steel from China directly but the American company ends up paying the tariff because it is the one doing the importing. So now it's affecting American companies instead of China

    • @rickybaker42
      @rickybaker42 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I don’t think you understood the video. If it’s more expensive to import steel than buy locally, American companies won’t import. This creates demand for local sources goods and floods the market with jobs as companies compete within America to earn our dollars.

    • @Kraidismyspiritanimal
      @Kraidismyspiritanimal 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@rickybaker42 That's the idea, you're right on that,but you have to think big picture too. If a company A imports from China and Chinese imports get a tariff, company A can't just shut down and say welp we're done. They have contracts and orders to honor, and workers who can't just lose their job, so they're stuck with that contract and the new tariffs. Plus, if Chinese steel gets a tariff but not German steel (for example), now the demand for German steel goes up, eventually hurting the Chinese economy. The increase in American goods is the ultimate goal, but that takes time..the factories need to be built, people need to be trained, infrastructure needs to be developed, etc.

    • @rickybaker42
      @rickybaker42 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Kraidismyspiritanimal that’s true, it’s a problem if we don’t have steel factories of our own. I imagine steel is not the best example because we could source locally if we wanted to, but I’m sure there is some good that, should a tariff be applied, would create the issue you’re describing. I just don’t think Trump would impose tariffs willy nilly without looking downstream and making sure we couldn’t handle it

  • @MrLumberjackz
    @MrLumberjackz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Wouldnt this become inflationary on a GLOBAL SCALE if implemented poorly?

    • @MeeesterBond17
      @MeeesterBond17 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      (Looks at the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1922)
      Why, yes. Yes it -would- did.

    • @AlexanderAsiamah-g9e
      @AlexanderAsiamah-g9e 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There's a main reason why tariffs aren't widely used anymore

  • @ASKstrive
    @ASKstrive 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm here after country A "America" put tariffs on country B "China"
    this may have short term benefits for country A but long term effects also until country B is not your country.

    • @LearntoInvest
      @LearntoInvest  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      For sure, I'm not a big fan of tariffs. Since its Country A's responsibility to pay for the tariff, I believe that any benefits are small if at all.

    • @ASKstrive
      @ASKstrive 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LearntoInvest Trade war is real.
      There are gangs, mafia, involves, if Country C is weak unlike A & B, i am from Pakistan category 'C' but honest than A & B now, ruled by hell corrupts till the end of 2018, for last 8 months, Pakistan has been trying its best to meet the measures to tackle trade deficits, bent down economy, Pakistan provide corridor to China for one belt & road initiative started by China to meet the middle east & Europe in days rather than weeks. I think trade is better than bombings which country 'A' do. Problem is no one is loyal & trusted all are working for their interest that put World on real threat, i.e Climate, Water, Animals & Humans.

    • @LimeLivesMatter
      @LimeLivesMatter 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Update on China's decrease in GDP (don't know what it is)

  • @andyyhimself
    @andyyhimself 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Better to have buyouts and correction overtime than war and crime👍

  • @MFEeee
    @MFEeee 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don’t know how I feel about this. Prices are regulated by supply and demand. And sometimes government laws makes making things in America expensive. While at the same time other counties don’t go through the same stringent testing American products go through if it costs less

    • @TheSpartan3669
      @TheSpartan3669 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think labor is where most of the production cost disparity stems from. Countries that pay workers $5 dollars a day are going to have products much cheaper than similar products made in the US based on that alone.

    • @scottcharney1091
      @scottcharney1091 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If the domestic consumers don't like the quality of the imports, they won't buy them. If they do like the products and/or the prices, domestic producers have an incentive to innovate.

  • @TirifokaGam-ki9vx
    @TirifokaGam-ki9vx 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    WHAT IS A QOUATAS?? PLEASE HELP ME

  • @JDWilliamsPD
    @JDWilliamsPD ปีที่แล้ว

    Bravo!

  • @StevenMiller-cx6co
    @StevenMiller-cx6co 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So buy the 14$ widget made in your country? Vs the widget with an added slave labor tax,

  • @userezdog7564
    @userezdog7564 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Then isn't a tariff the antithesis of a free market?

    • @scottcharney1091
      @scottcharney1091 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Yes.

    • @TheSilentWalkerz
      @TheSilentWalkerz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Which is ironic that so many republicans support it 😂

    • @AnimaChronix3
      @AnimaChronix3 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Free market is possible when everybody plays by the same rules. Countries have different regulations that influence cost so you sometime have to even the playing field with tariffs for a fair competition

  • @dalebabcock722
    @dalebabcock722 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Weather for the countries but they're not good for the consumers. The consumers are the one who gets screwed in all of this. It guarantees that everything that you buy goes up exponentially

  • @ntwynn
    @ntwynn 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +78

    Please share this to a Trump voter you know.

    • @cincent5805
      @cincent5805 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Will be a good review for them. Show to a democrat if you care to share new knowledge with them.

    • @TheSilentWalkerz
      @TheSilentWalkerz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It wouldn’t work because those morons don’t watch videos, they watch titles and argue with anyone without understanding the topic 😂 Many economist and Mitch McConnell said it was a bad idea to have tariffs

    • @scottcharney1091
      @scottcharney1091 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@TheSilentWalkerz Virtually all economists, in fact.

    • @scottcharney1091
      @scottcharney1091 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@cincent5805 Said Trumpists won't be paying attention, unfortunately.

    • @wesleytietz4506
      @wesleytietz4506 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Please inform democrats that Biden kept Trump's tariffs because so much money is pouring in.
      Also please tell Kamala Harris voters that if you take tariffs away that means country A (AKA USA) will lose jobs because of not having tarrifs.

  • @bossladypinkyworld3500
    @bossladypinkyworld3500 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    American importers pay the Tariff not the out of the country manufacturers that’s providing the goods. So how in the heck is Trump plan going to benefit the average American citizen? Our paychecks not increasing.

  • @icevariable9600
    @icevariable9600 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Trump thinks this is the answer; but it’s not. It hurts American companies that import, since they have to pay the tariff, increasing the price to distributors and retailers and customers.

    • @c-tfamilychronicles6517
      @c-tfamilychronicles6517 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Then why did it work so well? There are ways to do it intelligently and strategically. The economy was already recovering from Covid in 2021 when he left office. Then everything turned to a shitstorm and inflation went up to 9%, a record high, in 2022. It amazes me that people don’t think the BUSINESSMAN knows how to make money.

    • @kberken
      @kberken 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The truth is that trump refuses to learn that what he used to believe about tariffs is wrong. For whatever reason he thinks the exporter pays the tariff to the US government. And we get all the money and nothing else changes. But you can't convince him he's wrong! Vote Harris Walz! 💙💙

    • @brucelee9658
      @brucelee9658 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Then those companies would have to invest in domestic labor instead of foreign labor. That means more jobs for Americans. Buying imports is just giving money to other countries instead of Americans.

    • @TheSilentWalkerz
      @TheSilentWalkerz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@c-tfamilychronicles6517Nope, it actually caused a huge inflation problem for prices in 2016 to 2020. Stop listening to Fox News 😂

    • @mongo_sk
      @mongo_sk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@TheSilentWalkerz Inflation was actually not that out of hand and unemployment was at some of the best rates in decades, the inflation act that biden enacted literally dramatically rose inflation.

  • @kazumahaz563
    @kazumahaz563 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    came here after maddog trump tarif

  • @aarav_seth
    @aarav_seth 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice

  • @weard571
    @weard571 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Am here after President Trump imposed tariffs on Colombia

  • @LAFC.
    @LAFC. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Oooooh I get it now. So basically what you're saying is that I'm an idiot?

  • @GuyWhoWatchesStuff
    @GuyWhoWatchesStuff 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I imagine this video got a very.... "random" spike in views recently

  • @StevenVerbruggen
    @StevenVerbruggen 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    + 100% of the tarriffs are payed by the importer and not by tye exporter. If the exporter sells DAP or DDP the cost of transport up untill the importers door will be added to the price of the goods. In case of CIF, CFR, FCA (generally all incoterms with C anf F) the importer directly pays all domestic costs. As for EXW shipments the importer pays for everything directie even the exporttaxes in the country of origin. If you have any understanding of global shipping you know that eventually the consumer in the importing country will pay more for everything including domestic cause they can raise Prices to stay competitive. And because they can slap on the domesticly produced label they can even sell over imported Marketplace and people will pay for it to "support" domestic products.

  • @xxyyzz8464
    @xxyyzz8464 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All makes sense until the end. Basically explains how tariffs are bad for almost everyone except a select few companies that benefit by getting to be lazy, cost inefficient, not innovating, and relying on the government to artificially manipulate the market then somehow can’t come to the conclusion that tariffs are, usually, bad.

  • @tumsfestival8027
    @tumsfestival8027 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Hahaha and the people in country A, PAY MORE for the widget

  • @fairytail6939
    @fairytail6939 วันที่ผ่านมา

    if all countries have tariffs its good for thier country or protect there resources. but the consumer is not happy because of the price is growing higher. it maybe us also use tariffs to control the market because other countries is allied or some country is puppet by US because us fund them or to help their country. but they will pay US life time and US can demand any rules or managing their government

  • @mr.atomictitan9938
    @mr.atomictitan9938 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Basically if your an own of a company tariffs are good so you get less competition from other countries but for the common citizen this would be bad if someone wants to buy that import from the other country or don’t want to pay more taxes for a product that might be higher in quality than what their countries company is selling. Good for business bad for normal citizens

  • @69pepe420
    @69pepe420 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    funny how every country has tariffs on USA but we're told its a bad thing isn't it? one thing this video misses: tariffs are a bargaining chip for better trade deals and keeping good paying jobs

    • @billsmith3182
      @billsmith3182 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And paying off debt...

    • @69pepe420
      @69pepe420 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@billsmith3182 yup

    • @malachitaylor1579
      @malachitaylor1579 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's good to know but it's still might end up with that other country just going with somebody else

    • @malachitaylor1579
      @malachitaylor1579 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      But thank you very much for telling me about that

    • @neilmachon9828
      @neilmachon9828 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      For who?

  • @JasonLarsen-t3v
    @JasonLarsen-t3v 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    Trump supporters googling what a tariff is after the election. 😂

    • @damirisdamir
      @damirisdamir 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      My co worker is a trumper, seriously can't stand him when he makes small talk about politics. But then I learned how much he loves avocado hummus. Especially the ones imported from Mexico... 😂

    • @lukemager3519
      @lukemager3519 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Not a trump supporter but now curious about tariffs.

  • @edwardhenseleit5887
    @edwardhenseleit5887 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If the usa can put tariffs in everyone, what say other countries would do the same to the USA

  • @Doamino41
    @Doamino41 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Either way it ends up costing consumers billions of dollars, so it's bad

  • @AhmoseImhotep
    @AhmoseImhotep 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why dont country A just find a more cost efficient way to produce there own product instead depending on country b

    • @armandojtorres2129
      @armandojtorres2129 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Resources

    • @AhmoseImhotep
      @AhmoseImhotep 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@armandojtorres2129 so now my question is what if country b decides to not sell to country a due to its high tariffs price ? Now country a not only does not have the resources to produce the product but now they don’t have no one to sell it to them and what if it’s a high demand product … correct me if I’m wrong

    • @zzzmzzz4466
      @zzzmzzz4466 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@AhmoseImhotephigh tariff price? the country B doesnt have to pay anything, it’s the country A’s companies that import those goods have to pay the tariffs.

    • @AhmoseImhotep
      @AhmoseImhotep 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@zzzmzzz4466 ok I get i had to watch again ..

    • @BTonTV
      @BTonTV 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@AhmoseImhotep good questions!

  • @RjSierra-m2v
    @RjSierra-m2v หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm not sure I understand this. Do you mean we charge more import taxes to other countries products? If this is the case why did we stop doing it to start with?

  • @Swiftie-ef2ip
    @Swiftie-ef2ip 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Trump supporters scratching their bald heads in a year wondering why this is happening and why they can't blame Biden somehow for it.

    • @macias7125
      @macias7125 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This hasn’t even happened yet and how is this a bad thing?

    • @BTonTV
      @BTonTV 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Oh they'll find a way 🙄😂

  • @johnsmith-dm2tq
    @johnsmith-dm2tq 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    you forgot county c, now that all widgets are 16$ i can buy the nice French press widget instead of the Chinese one.

  • @Veenforwin
    @Veenforwin 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Simple to those who are here after the trade war thing then you simply use high quality American goods or simply start a business that's not in America

  • @Lola-Lola88
    @Lola-Lola88 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So in the end we are still gonna get f*cked 😢

    • @KelliAnnWinkler
      @KelliAnnWinkler 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You've been getting f*cked and don't even realize it. You ever wondered why China imposes tariffs on American goods? It's not because they are bad thing.

  • @jimihandtricks4291
    @jimihandtricks4291 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What is a widget? How do widgets Work?

  • @michaels7258
    @michaels7258 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Donald went to Wharton but still doesn’t know what a tariff is.

  • @exstand3029
    @exstand3029 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    trump should watch this

  • @blomabrainsout
    @blomabrainsout 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The only way i can see it being a good thing is if country A can sell country Bs product at a loss for country b, so country a would sell country bs product for 9 dollars while also making the extea 5 of so a profit of 1 dollar to country A on every item sold in country a, idk if im fully understanding it but yeah thats the only way it would be good. If thats even how it could work orherwise prices are just gonna continuously rise because people arent going to import here anymore and then guess what that means we cant get materials from other countries for cheap so we wont be able to make anything here cheap until we build the facilities to do so and that will take us years.

    • @blomabrainsout
      @blomabrainsout 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It only work if countries are dependent on sales in country A

  • @HalfBurntCarpetWeed
    @HalfBurntCarpetWeed วันที่ผ่านมา

    Widget

  • @summerSummer-k4k
    @summerSummer-k4k 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    maga!

  • @josephcenatus6085
    @josephcenatus6085 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I still don't get it okay i got it now 😊

  • @jordanrivera8174
    @jordanrivera8174 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Missed the part where if that company overseas couldn’t afford it they’ll bring their company over to another country to avoid the tariffs which creates more jobs.

    • @DinoDaley-xp2eo
      @DinoDaley-xp2eo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Let see how that work

    • @abrahamarreortua1707
      @abrahamarreortua1707 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The company oversees is not paying the tariffs. The importer is the one that pays the tariff.

  • @adamrussell658
    @adamrussell658 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Econ 101: Consumers pay.

  • @etiennevachon2813
    @etiennevachon2813 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Trump says he didn't start any wars… Well, he did. Trade wars. Absolute buffoon.

    • @AnimaChronix3
      @AnimaChronix3 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bring those low wage factory jobs that nobody will want to do back i guess is his great plan to save the economy

  • @danraul9759
    @danraul9759 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    How do you avoid a tariff? Businesses and manufacturing will move back to being American-made in the long term. Thanks Trump for prioritizing American made products, businesses, and most importantly, jobs.
    This video only covers the initial phase of implementing tariffs. Of course it's epxensive in the beginning. After people adjust, the dust settles with a thriving economy.

  • @mckessa17
    @mckessa17 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This video is for the uneducated.

  • @BridgetGullison
    @BridgetGullison 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Stop buying and selling to the us then

  • @monu2bhu
    @monu2bhu 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    USA destryed

  • @matthewvarnam4302
    @matthewvarnam4302 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Do yall know what this Video did not Explain....... TRADE DEFICIT!!!!!

  • @Commonsense1980-s7x
    @Commonsense1980-s7x 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's purpose is to BUY american goods over foreign goods.
    Who pays the cost of raising taxes on American companies?

  • @MxmxmxmxmMxmxmxmxm-o9r
    @MxmxmxmxmMxmxmxmxm-o9r 8 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Tariff is an *Arabic* word .
    from Ta'rif : to

  • @Les-i7e
    @Les-i7e หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If people dont know how it works. They should go back to school and get an education,

    • @garyoakham9723
      @garyoakham9723 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Ever wonder why trump is getting rid of the department of education