Courts needs to stop playing moral police and upheld the Right to life and liberty clearly mentioned in our Constitution. There should be no problem when two independent consenting adults live together.
All information about different judgements related to this matter n all facts are covered in same video..... easy to understand 😌 Thank you so much for such a detailed explanation 😊
Amazing explanation. You have a gift a of teaching. You clearly separated the duties of judges (his or her) opinions based on subjective vs objective judgement. Keep it up. I subscribed to your channel.
It is legal in many countries.....India should legalise this law.....it is there life ....they are free to live their lives freely....and government should provide protection to them.........
In the case of ujjwal kumari girl has just attained the age of 18. So if she claims that they are living in relationship for last one year, then it is not legal. It is allowed for 18+ age Now if we say that presently they are major and have a right, even them it is to be maintained for a reasonably long time
Live in ko yadi courts promote karenge toh obviously instability toh aayega ..no one will marry, everyone can choose a partner, live in for fun, have sex, jab man bhar gaya tab next partner. There will be no ethics left between a relationship. It'll become a joke. It's like 1-2 saal chalate hain phir change kar lenge .
while individual liberty deserves protection but verbatim replication of western liberalism in a conservative country like india may not command absolute social acceptance particularly when daughters are considered torch-bearers of family pride & honour
we are living in parent dependent society . like this actions we morally ,ethically betraying our parents, at least, do marriage , and live ,if one that any person cheated other ,again we go to parent at every situation we are depending on them , don't give shit to society at least get approval from parents.
Punjab haryana high court hai ya gaao ki panchayat. High court ne kaanoon ka galat istemal kiya hai is judgement me kyuki supreme court high court se bhi uper hai aur jab supreme court ne live in relationship ko crime nahi maana hai to fir high court aisa ghatiya judgement kaise de sakti hai? High court ke against supreme court me case karna chahiye. 2 audults agar aapsi sahmati se live in me rahna chahte hai to ye kisi bhi tarah gunah nahi hai.
It's out of jurisdiction for courts to play moral police. Their work is to upheld the Constitution and legal matters in our country. Don't be delusional.
Bahut padhe likhe hone k baad b morality ko jurisdiction me consider na krna, yahi to foolishness h, morality is meant for making society peaceful. So judgement should harmonize with morality, else it will only create havoc in the society. Which we can see. Inspite of there judgement they could not make society peaceful. Rather those spiritual communities are very peaceful following morality. Morality is such a nice thing that it does not even need these courts. When people becomes immoral then the role of courts comes in the scene. If courts itself start avoiding morality in their judgement, simply by the help of some strict laws they think they can make society peaceful, means they are in illusion. Spiritual and moral education should be propagated in the society to avoid case like domestic voilence in marriages. Good moral n spiritual training should should given in schools as well as in COLLEGES, which is lacking and that is the root of all problems. When wmen will be well cultured, every women will be ready to take shelter of him. If men n women will remain selfish n exploitative for their personal desires then problems will arise. Problem is uncultured men n women in the society to lack of proper education system. Right to life can be applied only when it does not disturb the fabrics of society. Like a thief wants to live, but his stealing cannot be given protection by the courts on the name of right to life. This way of living life is not justified. Way should be changed. Similarly this way to living life in live-in is not suitable for the well being of society. One should try to live his life in his limits of morality. Like that of thief.
Protection to dena chahiye. Lekin main aapse ye puchta hoon ki 18, 19, ….22 ke bacho ko ye bhi pta hota hi, usse kya kerna hai zindgi me ? Maximum ko nahi pta,,,, Romantic movies dekh ker life - partner dundna ya sex kerna hi zindgi nahi hota….. Aur mera ye maan-na hai ke aise couple me ek well settle hona chahiye means job honi chahiye. Taaki usse pta chale ki duniya kaisi hai. Kaise kaise log hote hai, jo ek dusre ka kaat-te hain. Khule vichar, broad-mind ka mtlb ye nahi hota ki aapko jo pasand aaye usse shaadi karo, ya sex karo Orr bolo meri marzi. Ya living me rho. Broad mind ka mtlb hai ki aapko samjh honi chahiye ki kon aapka use le rha. Sex education ka pta hona chahiye, ki kya kya changes hote hain body me.
If they have guts to write it to the court.....it means they are matured enough to take their own decision but on the other hand family should also have the right to abandon them from their property right
Thik h unka rista Punjab judge ko thik nhi laga but iska matlb ye bilkul nhi h ke ap unhe Marta hua chhor de.......iska indirect yahi h ke relatives unhe maar de......
High courts mein bhi Khaap mindset wale judges aa gaye hain to Justice kahan se hoga? Inke hisab se to couple ko marne diya jaye unke bloodthirsty parents and family members se. Right to chose life partner is a basic human right of an adult. Parents, family or society have no right to interfere in an adult's personal liberty of choice. Courts and Police must provide protection to whosoever needs. It is the duty of the court and police to safeguard the life of citizens. The couple can go against the High court verdict in Supreme court and ask for the justice.
Live in ka system western country se aaya h jhaan 18 saal mein bache job karna start kar dete h aur apni responsibility khudh uthate h .............. India mein 18 saal mein to log graduation v nhi kr paate .. .... . Aur live in mein rhne ki baat krte krte rhne v lgte hain ............kuch social niyam shi hota h freedom or progress ke naam pe kuch purane niyam ko galt kehna ya ignor krna thik nhi ............
This mindset of the judges is rooted in the shameful "honour culture" of our country. I can't believe, this is coming from a High Court!!!
This type of judges are Depriving the faith of people in judiciary, denying giving protection to fundamental right to life (21).
Courts needs to stop playing moral police and upheld the Right to life and liberty clearly mentioned in our Constitution.
There should be no problem when two independent consenting adults live together.
Theses kind of judgement makes people think that judges are biased and law can be sold to powerful people.
Brilliantly explained 💓
Protection to dena bnta hai
All information about different judgements related to this matter n all facts are covered in same video..... easy to understand 😌
Thank you so much for such a detailed explanation 😊
Live in mein rehna moral nhi hai ye thik hai,lekin court ko article 21 ki respect krte huye couple ko protection provide krna chahiye.
So judges are kind of justifying murder because they decided to be in a live in a relationship wah
Ab toh judiciary s bhi bharosa uthte ja rha h
Nice explanation sir 👍👍👍
Amazing explanation. You have a gift a of teaching. You clearly separated the duties of judges (his or her) opinions based on subjective vs objective judgement. Keep it up. I subscribed to your channel.
classic example of the tussle between social morality & constitutional morality
Can we complaint against high Court judge
Ya u can
Yeah you can in Supreme Court if you think the court judgment was biased you can also file a Review petition
What an explanation ❤️ well done sir
Nicely explained 👍👍
Informative ❤️
Greatly explained sir
greatly explained 👌👌👌
I ,first time watched ur lecture and ur explanation on the deep root of the topic is .... Fantastic...
Nice explanation
You are good explainer 🙏sir ji
It is not "in the garb of filing". It is " in the grab of filing"
Sir please upload videos in 1080p
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Awesome explanation
Indian court plz make quick decision in rape cases rather than interfering in people's life
Great session
Great explaination
It is legal in many countries.....India should legalise this law.....it is there life ....they are free to live their lives freely....and government should provide protection to them.........
Good teaching style
Sounds like khap panchayat decision not HC!!
In the case of ujjwal kumari girl has just attained the age of 18. So if she claims that they are living in relationship for last one year, then it is not legal. It is allowed for 18+ age
Now if we say that presently they are major and have a right, even them it is to be maintained for a reasonably long time
Lawyer with ADDRESS
Now incompetent judges are coming. We took reverse gear 🙏
nice information
Good explanation
Right to life है, रहेगा
If justice cannot be granted by the judge then we cannot except anything at all..
Well, is by "social fabric" they mean honour killing, dowry etc, the yes. Live in relationships will destroy the "social fabric".
Protection dena chahiye
I am a marred boy Living relationship whit out divorse kay a appruvel ha raha shakta ha hum please answer me
What is apex court?
Protection toh jroori hai
Punjab ACTOR WITH ADDRESS with
Protection lga k protection maagre ab🤣🤣🤣🤣 ..
(Majak h bhai dil m na le lio koi bhi )
Guru dev🙏
ये क्या है ? Protection आखिर किंयू नहीं? Supreme Court verdict violated here
Its haryana what we can expect now
Live in ko yadi courts promote karenge toh obviously instability toh aayega ..no one will marry, everyone can choose a partner, live in for fun, have sex, jab man bhar gaya tab next partner. There will be no ethics left between a relationship. It'll become a joke. It's like 1-2 saal chalate hain phir change kar lenge .
Gazab sir
while individual liberty deserves protection but verbatim replication of western liberalism in a conservative country like india may not command absolute social acceptance particularly when daughters are considered torch-bearers of family pride & honour
Good decision
I stand with high court
we are living in parent dependent society . like this actions we morally ,ethically betraying our parents, at least, do marriage , and live ,if one that any person cheated other ,again we go to parent at every situation we are depending on them , don't give shit to society at least get approval from parents.
A couple is living in live-in relationship besides me
Good morning 🙏🙏
15:05 judiciary se biswas to sc ne utha diya hai aise atrangi nirnay deke .
Are these adults financially independent?
Punjab haryana high court hai ya gaao ki panchayat. High court ne kaanoon ka galat istemal kiya hai is judgement me kyuki supreme court high court se bhi uper hai aur jab supreme court ne live in relationship ko crime nahi maana hai to fir high court aisa ghatiya judgement kaise de sakti hai? High court ke against supreme court me case karna chahiye. 2 audults agar aapsi sahmati se live in me rahna chahte hai to ye kisi bhi tarah gunah nahi hai.
Haryana pre expected date
👍 good judgement 🙏 for our indian society to protect western bad cultures.
Konse jamane me jite ho
It's out of jurisdiction for courts to play moral police.
Their work is to upheld the Constitution and legal matters in our country.
Don't be delusional.
Bahut padhe likhe hone k baad b morality ko jurisdiction me consider na krna, yahi to foolishness h, morality is meant for making society peaceful. So judgement should harmonize with morality, else it will only create havoc in the society. Which we can see. Inspite of there judgement they could not make society peaceful. Rather those spiritual communities are very peaceful following morality. Morality is such a nice thing that it does not even need these courts. When people becomes immoral then the role of courts comes in the scene. If courts itself start avoiding morality in their judgement, simply by the help of some strict laws they think they can make society peaceful, means they are in illusion. Spiritual and moral education should be propagated in the society to avoid case like domestic voilence in marriages. Good moral n spiritual training should should given in schools as well as in COLLEGES, which is lacking and that is the root of all problems. When wmen will be well cultured, every women will be ready to take shelter of him. If men n women will remain selfish n exploitative for their personal desires then problems will arise. Problem is uncultured men n women in the society to lack of proper education system. Right to life can be applied only when it does not disturb the fabrics of society. Like a thief wants to live, but his stealing cannot be given protection by the courts on the name of right to life. This way of living life is not justified. Way should be changed. Similarly this way to living life in live-in is not suitable for the well being of society. One should try to live his life in his limits of morality. Like that of thief.
Protection to dena chahiye. Lekin main aapse ye puchta hoon ki 18, 19, ….22 ke bacho ko ye bhi pta hota hi, usse kya kerna hai zindgi me ? Maximum ko nahi pta,,,, Romantic movies dekh ker life - partner dundna ya sex kerna hi zindgi nahi hota…..
Aur mera ye maan-na hai ke aise couple me ek well settle hona chahiye means job honi chahiye. Taaki usse pta chale ki duniya kaisi hai. Kaise kaise log hote hai, jo ek dusre ka kaat-te hain.
Khule vichar, broad-mind ka mtlb ye nahi hota ki aapko jo pasand aaye usse shaadi karo, ya sex karo Orr bolo meri marzi. Ya living me rho. Broad mind ka mtlb hai ki aapko samjh honi chahiye ki kon aapka use le rha. Sex education ka pta hona chahiye, ki kya kya changes hote hain body me.
Correct✅
If they have guts to write it to the court.....it means they are matured enough to take their own decision but on the other hand family should also have the right to abandon them from their property right
Thik h unka rista Punjab judge ko thik nhi laga but iska matlb ye bilkul nhi h ke ap unhe Marta hua chhor de.......iska indirect yahi h ke relatives unhe maar de......
live in relationship may shadhi k baad wally kaam pahly ho jata hai, aysa case may sirf naasamjh log he Fhasty hai.
Kaise kaise log ban jaate hai judge...
High courts mein bhi Khaap mindset wale judges aa gaye hain to Justice kahan se hoga? Inke hisab se to couple ko marne diya jaye unke bloodthirsty parents and family members se. Right to chose life partner is a basic human right of an adult. Parents, family or society have no right to interfere in an adult's personal liberty of choice. Courts and Police must provide protection to whosoever needs. It is the duty of the court and police to safeguard the life of citizens. The couple can go against the High court verdict in Supreme court and ask for the justice.
Orthodox judge hoga panjab ka
Ye judge kya padhe likhe h ki nahi?
😂
Judge kafi conservative thought k h, + logo ki life ki tension kam h unko, society ki jyda. 😂
Sometimes ye judges Khaab panchayat me bhi job krte h 😂
Kon in murkho ko judge bna deta pta nhi
Bhai india hai ye America nhi live in me reh kyun rha hai....court marriage krle uske baad petition daalta may be tab protection mil jaati.
What rubbish!!!
ये लोग सुप्रीम कोर्ट में याचिका दायर नही कर सकते क्या
Yaha pai choice ki heterosexuality allow nhii to homosexuality to dur ki baat hai. Matalab judiciary sirf naam ki bachi hai .
Its wrong decision of Haryana court
Hamari society piche jaa rahi hai
Bhaiya love kro toh government pe trust krna chodd dena....
Live in ka system western country se aaya h jhaan 18 saal mein bache job karna start kar dete h aur apni responsibility khudh uthate h .............. India mein 18 saal mein to log graduation v nhi kr paate .. .... . Aur live in mein rhne ki baat krte krte rhne v lgte hain ............kuch social niyam shi hota h freedom or progress ke naam pe kuch purane niyam ko galt kehna ya ignor krna thik nhi ............
Good decision by court.....for protecting our culture
Right decision of high court.
💩💩💩💩
High court judgment EXCELLENT...
Nice decision
Bilkul shi kra court ne