Thanks for the video. It is great if you could mention that only FLIR provides a post processing software for reporting and full radiometric images saved. SEEK doesn't have fully radiometric capability or post processing software. It can only do on board image editing.
I had the seek shotpro and a few other cameras for a few weeks when this first came out. The temperature accuracy of the shotpro was really bad and most of the time WAY off. Thinking about getting the flir C5 now.
I can't believe that in this review and also the C3 vs C5 comparison you didn't talk at all about the metering functions. After all, we usually want to _measure_ temperature, not just look at colorful images. One of my big complaints with my Flir One Pro is how difficult it is to drag the spot markers to precise positions on the iPhone screen, and I'd like to know how the C5 and the Seek compare in that respect.
We've tested smartphone accessory style units from both FLIR and Seek. We recommend both for different reasons - it depends on the features you need/want. We have an in-depth comparison video here: th-cam.com/video/JgO5o5Wvb6A/w-d-xo.html
Neither of these cameras are intended for skin temperature testing so they won't have great accuracy for this application. That said, we do offer quite a few IR cameras that are designed for skin temperature. Below are a few affordable options we have in-stock right now: www.tequipment.net/Hikvision/EBT510/Thermal-Temperature-Screening-Systems/ www.tequipment.net/JETION/JT-66K/Elevated-Body-Temperature-Screening/
Both of these will excel in that application. If you only need to locate moisture, go with ShotPro because it has higher resolution and is cheaper. Check it out on our site here: www.tequipment.net/Seek-Thermal/ShotPRO/Building-and-Industrial-Thermal-Imagers/
I enjoy your videos, lots of good info. How do you rate the C3-X against the Seek Shot and ShotPro? The C3-X seem to have, for the most part, about the same specs to the C5 aside from the higher temp limit. Thanks.
Thanks, glad you like the videos. The C3-X is a good camera and is basically the same as the C5 but it is much more stripped-down with less features. The C5 has higher IR resolution, video streaming, zoom capabilities, 1-Touch Level/Span, and a higher temperature range limit. Check out the C3-X on our site here: www.tequipment.net/FLIR/C3-X/Building-and-Industrial-Thermal-Imagers/
i've been enjoying your reviews. i'd like some advice in buying a thermal imaging camera. part for hobbyist pursuits, part for pizza oven thermal imaging, part artistic interest and a little bit for restaurant and condo association maintenance and diagnostic stuff, but nothing that needs super precision or scientific accuracy. i'd like either a pocket camera or usbc phone attachment. preferably landscape. don't care much about accuracy, more interest in image quality for digital and printed images. interested in variety and quality of color palettes or other image tricks for interesting images. models that do a good job of blending thermal and visual images. don't want forced watermarks. interested in models that will likely have longest firmware support if that's even a thing.. price is under $650. these are ones i've identified as models of interest and welcome any strong recommendations in this group or out. HIKMICRO Pocket 2 Seek ShotPRO Flir C5 Seek Compact Pro XR Seek Compact Pro (usb c)
Hello, Daniel! We would love to help make some recommendations. TEquipment has product specialists that would be able to review this with you, so feel free to contact us via phone, email, or Live Chat at the link below. We look forward to hearing from you! Contact Us: www.tequipment.net/service/contact/
Hello, Christopher! No, unfortunately the FLIR C5 camera is unable to stream video over Wi-Fi. Video streaming is only possible using a USB cable. If you have any further questions feel free to contact us via phone, email, or Live Chat here: www.tequipment.net/service/contact/
In the image comparison it looks like they are showing different results. The flir has dark blues, but the seek is all red?? Which one is more correct. Looks like the flir?
We did not verify the temperature accuracy in those sample images, they are purely to show the differences in resolution and Fusion/MSX. It could be that the color variations you see are just due to the color palette differences between each camera. FLIR states that C5 accuracy from 0 to 100°C (32 to 212°F) is ±3°C (±5.5°F) and from 100 to 400°C (212 to 752°F) is ±3%. Seek has not published the accuracy rating of the ShotPro in any of the product materials.
I would like to know which difference sharp pictures mean when I'm inspecting walls & ceilings. Also I'd like a live-test on a high rise building (5 to 15 stores) but I live in the Netherlands. I'm looking for sharpness of overall view - which looks like the C5 won.. - looking for temp. differences in ceilings (like secret entrances & inside hollow spaces - I've got a person in my apartment that I've never met or seen. - looking for hemp-growth apartments equipment like lamps, ventilators etc. in an apartment. Could you otherwise recommend a camera for either the 1st or 2nd job ? (< 1000 euro's)
Either the C5 or ShotPro would be a good candidate for your application - for the price, these cameras offer the best features and resolution. Both cameras are able to identify temperature differences in ceilings and walls to show gaps and missing insulation. These cameras are also able to detect the excessive heat generated by indoor plant growing equipment but they can't see through walls so you wouldn't be able to see any actual equipment in use. Check out the image comparison at 07:34 and the live demo at 08:05 - the ShotPro does have higher resolution but the C5 has MSX which is much better at giving you those visual details than Seek Fusion. FLIR also has better reporting software and a more polished user interface on the camera. It really comes down to what is more important to you for your application.
Both of these cameras allow you to save radiometric images (images with temperature data). However, only FLIR C5 includes the software you need to analyze and edit these images. It's called FLIR Tools and it's free with most FLIR cameras, Seek doesn't currently offer any software like this.
For the C5 definitely. It’s a really nice device and can I can confirm that you can inspect the type of info you’re wanting in post. Makes it really nice when you can just focus on getting shots quick and evaluating data later on.
One note on the C5: if you take just a straight up image (this just the 5MP camera) without using a camera mode that utilizes the thermal it will NOT also capture data. But 99.9% of the time you’d likely not be in that mode anyway since if you just wanted to take a pic you’d likely use your phone’s camera. Just wanted to point that one exception out.
Hello! The Seek Thermal ShotPRO has a better clarity at 320 x 240 (76,800 pixels), while the FLIR C5 has a sensor of 160 × 120 (19,200 pixels). In terms of temperature range, the ShotPRO has a range of -40°F to 626°F, while the C5 has a range of -4° to 752°F, meaning the C5 has a higher range, but the ShotPRO can measure lower temps., so it all depends on your needs. If you have any further questions feel free to contact us via phone, email, or Live Chat here: www.tequipment.net/service/contact/
sir for use pcb and home inspection which more suitable? seek shotpro , seek reveal pro , flir c2 or flir c5 i dont need cloud service or any pc software. just need see directly many thank before
All the cameras you list are excellent. Since you don't need special features, it comes down to the resolution that you need. Higher IR resolution is almost always better. The Seek ShotPro is the best choice with highest IR resolution: www.tequipment.net/Seek-Thermal/ShotPRO/Building-and-Industrial-Thermal-Imagers/
In both cameras you can adjust for emissivity and reflected temperature in the settings and your camera will compensate accordingly. If you have any further questions feel free to contact us via phone, email, or Live Chat here: www.tequipment.net/service/contact/
Thanks for your review. I am looking for one thermal camera. But I am looking for a function to measure the temperature from the saved video. SEEK pro has a function to measure the temperature from the saved photo. I wonder if SEEK pro can measure the temp from the saved video. Can you please advise?
In fact, none of Seek's thermal cameras provide radiometric thermal video (video with temperature data) which you can use to measure temperature values. The ShotPro does allow you to stream thermal video over WiFi, but it isn't radiometric so there is no temperature data. The cheapest IR camera from FLIR that provides radiometric thermal video is the E53 - you can check it out here: www.tequipment.net/FLIR/E53/Building-and-Industrial-Thermal-Imagers/
After my bad flir one pro (ios) battery experience (and still having) and the incredibly poor after service flir provided, I’m am put off from buying another, however I need to buy what is the best for the job. I’m an electrician that will require long(ish) range as well as close up, and the ability to pinpoint hot points and both ranges, which one would your head buy? Cheers👍🏻
Sorry to hear you had that issue with FLIR ONE Pro. We have not heard of any similar issues on any other FLIR units. If you're trying to decide between the C5 and ShotPro it really comes down to which features you want/need. Both cameras will do what you require - long/short range and hot spots. ShotPro has higher resolution and a lower price, and it still offers image blending. The only big thing it lacks is reporting software. C5 has some cool features that let you transfer images wirelessly and it comes with FLIR Tools for easy reporting. C5 also has a more polished interface. Check them out on our site - FLIR C5: bit.ly/2GMhq2e Seek ShotPro: bit.ly/3jLDzMM
It depends on your specific needs and your application. The Seek ShotPro has higher infrared resolution at 320x240 pixels. The FLIR C5 has thermal resolution of 160x120 - that's still very powerful and meets the RESNET standard for building inspection. Overall, the Seek ShotPro will provide sharper thermal images thanks to its higher resolution. However, the C5 has MSX image blending which is far better than Seek Fusion. It also comes with free FLIR Tools reporting software which makes it really easy to make professional reports for clients. The C5 also has a much better user interface, and it's backed by FLIR which is one of the biggest names in thermal imaging. The choice is up to you, there is no clear winner between these 2 cameras. It really comes down to which features you value the most for your needs.
You would probably be better off with the Seek ShotPro - it's a bit cheaper and offers higher IR resolution at 320x240. That said, neither manufacturer has published an official range statistic for these cameras since they are really intended for industrial and mechanical troubleshooting, home inspections, HVAC, and automotive repairs. For something a bit more suited to outdoor use at longer ranges check out the Seek RevealPRO at the link below. It's around the same price and has an advertised range of up to 1,800ft: www.tequipment.net/Seek-Thermal/RevealPRO/Building-and-Industrial-Thermal-Imagers/
We don't carry anything specifically for recording thermal videos, but our experts might be able to point you in the right direction. We have thermographers on-staff who are experts in all areas of professional thermal imaging. Feel free to call us at (877) 571-7901, email Sales@TEquipment.net, or live chat on www.tequipment.net/ during business hours.
@@iknowhatisaw check out the FLIR Scout TK. It’s their low end thermal monocular. A little dated (no WiFi and no Bluetooth) but it takes video (no audio however). Decent little thermal that won’t give away position at night since there’s no bright LCD screen. Guessing that might be something to check out. Rechargeable via micro USB and transfer pics/video to computer via USB connection too. If giving away position isn’t a necessity then another option is to check out the FLIR One Pro which connects to your iPhone/Android and can also save video. You get all the core FLIR UX/UI on your phone including MSX.
7:43 .... I really dont need more..... Seek Thermal ShotPRO is just much better option. What I need more, than better thermal images? Flir has just much better advertising. They now, how to do something from nothing. Reports....cloud... You just dont need that. If there is an option how to donwload this great images from Seek to PC, what do you need more? You can edit them and make report from them. And Cloud?? I have much of space on my PC for these files..... Sometimes it seems to me that Flir explicitly deceives / scam customers. Why is better sharp-edge no thermal camera to me? Thermal images are what I am interested in. Again there with scam .... Sharp edges give the impression of a better image, but we are talking about thermal images and Flir definitely ... I repeat ... DEFINITELY Flir doesn't has! I'm a little surprised by you that you don't say unequivocally that Seek is simply better for thermal images. You're talking about algorithms for Flir, yet it just smoothing the mistakes that are there as well. But thank you very much for the video, because after I saw that images I am definitelly going for Seek :-)
Many of our professional users prefer FLIR because of the excellent additional features like FLIR Tools for easy reporting. MSX does make a huge difference when you're doing inspections of equipment and buildings because it gives you context of what you're looking at. Cloud connectivity is also nice for super fast image review by colleagues. That said, Seek does have better thermal images because of the higher resolution - if that's your main concern, then you should go for the ShotPRO.
That's correct - you must upload the images to FLIR Ignite Cloud first then from there you can download them from the cloud to your devices. Sorry if it was unclear in the video.
The ShotPro has 320x240 infrared resolution, the C5 has 160x120 resolution. If you want 640x480 you're going to have to spend a lot more money - the cheapest camera we sell with that resolution is over $7,000. You can browse them all here: www.tequipment.net/thermal-imagers/building-and-industrial-thermal-imagers/#/thermal-imagers/building-and-industrial-thermal-imagers/detector-size_640x480sensor/?F_Sort=3
Seriously, he needs to talk louder and put more into his emotional tone. I started to fall asleep when listening to his quiet monotone voice! Personally in my opinion, the seek shot pro seems better for electronics but the C5 seems better for electrical conduit and thermal differential due to insulation deficiency.
![Warhammer 40k: Space Marine 2 | เพื่อจักรพรรดิ ! [ตอนเดียวจบ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4M0ckYMA4-U/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks for the video. It is great if you could mention that only FLIR provides a post processing software for reporting and full radiometric images saved. SEEK doesn't have fully radiometric capability or post processing software. It can only do on board image editing.
Thanks for your input and glad you liked the video! We'll put software comparisons on our list for future thermal videos.
Thank you for the time you took to make this video! I appreciate your honest opinion, liked and subscribed.
Thank you! Glad it was helpful.
I had the seek shotpro and a few other cameras for a few weeks when this first came out. The temperature accuracy of the shotpro was really bad and most of the time WAY off.
Thinking about getting the flir C5 now.
I can't believe that in this review and also the C3 vs C5 comparison you didn't talk at all about the metering functions. After all, we usually want to _measure_ temperature, not just look at colorful images. One of my big complaints with my Flir One Pro is how difficult it is to drag the spot markers to precise positions on the iPhone screen, and I'd like to know how the C5 and the Seek compare in that respect.
We appreciate the feedback, that is an excellent point we left out. We'll try to make a follow up video and compare the metering features.
Thanks for the great video. I'm curious what you think of the camera plug in units from flir and seek..
We've tested smartphone accessory style units from both FLIR and Seek. We recommend both for different reasons - it depends on the features you need/want. We have an in-depth comparison video here: th-cam.com/video/JgO5o5Wvb6A/w-d-xo.html
Thank you very much 🤝
can you do a review of the HikMicro Pocket2
Which would be a better thermal camera for measuring skin temperatures. I am measuring facial temperatures of the cheek, jaw and forehead.
Neither of these cameras are intended for skin temperature testing so they won't have great accuracy for this application. That said, we do offer quite a few IR cameras that are designed for skin temperature. Below are a few affordable options we have in-stock right now:
www.tequipment.net/Hikvision/EBT510/Thermal-Temperature-Screening-Systems/
www.tequipment.net/JETION/JT-66K/Elevated-Body-Temperature-Screening/
Refresh rate 9 and 15Hz on Seek SHOT Pro?
I'm a plumbing contractor and I'm trying to expand my tools. Wondering which one is better to find leaks in walls/ ceilings.
Both of these will excel in that application. If you only need to locate moisture, go with ShotPro because it has higher resolution and is cheaper. Check it out on our site here: www.tequipment.net/Seek-Thermal/ShotPRO/Building-and-Industrial-Thermal-Imagers/
I enjoy your videos, lots of good info. How do you rate the C3-X against the Seek Shot and ShotPro? The C3-X seem to have, for the most part, about the same specs to the C5 aside from the higher temp limit. Thanks.
Thanks, glad you like the videos. The C3-X is a good camera and is basically the same as the C5 but it is much more stripped-down with less features. The C5 has higher IR resolution, video streaming, zoom capabilities, 1-Touch Level/Span, and a higher temperature range limit. Check out the C3-X on our site here: www.tequipment.net/FLIR/C3-X/Building-and-Industrial-Thermal-Imagers/
i've been enjoying your reviews. i'd like some advice in buying a thermal imaging camera. part for hobbyist pursuits, part for pizza oven thermal imaging, part artistic interest and a little bit for restaurant and condo association maintenance and diagnostic stuff, but nothing that needs super precision or scientific accuracy. i'd like either a pocket camera or usbc phone attachment. preferably landscape. don't care much about accuracy, more interest in image quality for digital and printed images. interested in variety and quality of color palettes or other image tricks for interesting images. models that do a good job of blending thermal and visual images. don't want forced watermarks. interested in models that will likely have longest firmware support if that's even a thing.. price is under $650.
these are ones i've identified as models of interest and welcome any strong recommendations in this group or out.
HIKMICRO Pocket 2
Seek ShotPRO
Flir C5
Seek Compact Pro XR
Seek Compact Pro (usb c)
Hello, Daniel! We would love to help make some recommendations. TEquipment has product specialists that would be able to review this with you, so feel free to contact us via phone, email, or Live Chat at the link below. We look forward to hearing from you!
Contact Us: www.tequipment.net/service/contact/
Can you strap a c5 to the bottom of a drone and get live wifi video transmitted to a tablet 100 ft range ?
Hello, Christopher! No, unfortunately the FLIR C5 camera is unable to stream video over Wi-Fi. Video streaming is only possible using a USB cable. If you have any further questions feel free to contact us via phone, email, or Live Chat here:
www.tequipment.net/service/contact/
In the image comparison it looks like they are showing different results. The flir has dark blues, but the seek is all red?? Which one is more correct. Looks like the flir?
We did not verify the temperature accuracy in those sample images, they are purely to show the differences in resolution and Fusion/MSX. It could be that the color variations you see are just due to the color palette differences between each camera. FLIR states that C5 accuracy from 0 to 100°C (32 to 212°F) is ±3°C (±5.5°F) and from 100 to 400°C (212 to 752°F) is ±3%. Seek has not published the accuracy rating of the ShotPro in any of the product materials.
I would like to know which difference sharp pictures mean when I'm inspecting walls & ceilings.
Also I'd like a live-test on a high rise building (5 to 15 stores) but I live in the Netherlands.
I'm looking for sharpness of overall view - which looks like the C5 won..
- looking for temp. differences in ceilings (like secret entrances & inside hollow spaces - I've got a person in my apartment that I've never met or seen.
- looking for hemp-growth apartments equipment like lamps, ventilators etc. in an apartment.
Could you otherwise recommend a camera for either the 1st or 2nd job ? (< 1000 euro's)
Either the C5 or ShotPro would be a good candidate for your application - for the price, these cameras offer the best features and resolution. Both cameras are able to identify temperature differences in ceilings and walls to show gaps and missing insulation. These cameras are also able to detect the excessive heat generated by indoor plant growing equipment but they can't see through walls so you wouldn't be able to see any actual equipment in use. Check out the image comparison at 07:34 and the live demo at 08:05 - the ShotPro does have higher resolution but the C5 has MSX which is much better at giving you those visual details than Seek Fusion. FLIR also has better reporting software and a more polished user interface on the camera. It really comes down to what is more important to you for your application.
Is it possible with either of these two cameras to save the images and then check the temperatures of different spots, later on, using a computer?
Both of these cameras allow you to save radiometric images (images with temperature data). However, only FLIR C5 includes the software you need to analyze and edit these images. It's called FLIR Tools and it's free with most FLIR cameras, Seek doesn't currently offer any software like this.
For the C5 definitely. It’s a really nice device and can I can confirm that you can inspect the type of info you’re wanting in post. Makes it really nice when you can just focus on getting shots quick and evaluating data later on.
One note on the C5: if you take just a straight up image (this just the 5MP camera) without using a camera mode that utilizes the thermal it will NOT also capture data. But 99.9% of the time you’d likely not be in that mode anyway since if you just wanted to take a pic you’d likely use your phone’s camera. Just wanted to point that one exception out.
Hi which is the best one for outdoors based on range and clarity?
Hello! The Seek Thermal ShotPRO has a better clarity at 320 x 240 (76,800 pixels), while the FLIR C5 has a sensor of 160 × 120 (19,200 pixels). In terms of temperature range, the ShotPRO has a range of -40°F to 626°F, while the C5 has a range of -4° to 752°F, meaning the C5 has a higher range, but the ShotPRO can measure lower temps., so it all depends on your needs.
If you have any further questions feel free to contact us via phone, email, or Live Chat here:
www.tequipment.net/service/contact/
sir for use pcb and home inspection which more suitable?
seek shotpro , seek reveal pro , flir c2 or flir c5
i dont need cloud service or any pc software. just need see directly
many thank before
All the cameras you list are excellent. Since you don't need special features, it comes down to the resolution that you need. Higher IR resolution is almost always better. The Seek ShotPro is the best choice with highest IR resolution: www.tequipment.net/Seek-Thermal/ShotPRO/Building-and-Industrial-Thermal-Imagers/
Can you adjust for more reflective metal surfaces?
In both cameras you can adjust for emissivity and reflected temperature in the settings and your camera will compensate accordingly. If you have any further questions feel free to contact us via phone, email, or Live Chat here:
www.tequipment.net/service/contact/
Thanks for your review.
I am looking for one thermal camera. But I am looking for a function to measure the temperature from the saved video.
SEEK pro has a function to measure the temperature from the saved photo. I wonder if SEEK pro can measure the temp from the saved video.
Can you please advise?
In fact, none of Seek's thermal cameras provide radiometric thermal video (video with temperature data) which you can use to measure temperature values. The ShotPro does allow you to stream thermal video over WiFi, but it isn't radiometric so there is no temperature data. The cheapest IR camera from FLIR that provides radiometric thermal video is the E53 - you can check it out here: www.tequipment.net/FLIR/E53/Building-and-Industrial-Thermal-Imagers/
After my bad flir one pro (ios) battery experience (and still having) and the incredibly poor after service flir provided, I’m am put off from buying another, however I need to buy what is the best for the job.
I’m an electrician that will require long(ish) range as well as close up, and the ability to pinpoint hot points and both ranges, which one would your head buy?
Cheers👍🏻
Sorry to hear you had that issue with FLIR ONE Pro. We have not heard of any similar issues on any other FLIR units. If you're trying to decide between the C5 and ShotPro it really comes down to which features you want/need. Both cameras will do what you require - long/short range and hot spots. ShotPro has higher resolution and a lower price, and it still offers image blending. The only big thing it lacks is reporting software. C5 has some cool features that let you transfer images wirelessly and it comes with FLIR Tools for easy reporting. C5 also has a more polished interface. Check them out on our site -
FLIR C5: bit.ly/2GMhq2e
Seek ShotPro: bit.ly/3jLDzMM
Sir
seek shot pro or flir c5 thermal camera ?
It depends on your specific needs and your application. The Seek ShotPro has higher infrared resolution at 320x240 pixels. The FLIR C5 has thermal resolution of 160x120 - that's still very powerful and meets the RESNET standard for building inspection. Overall, the Seek ShotPro will provide sharper thermal images thanks to its higher resolution. However, the C5 has MSX image blending which is far better than Seek Fusion. It also comes with free FLIR Tools reporting software which makes it really easy to make professional reports for clients. The C5 also has a much better user interface, and it's backed by FLIR which is one of the biggest names in thermal imaging. The choice is up to you, there is no clear winner between these 2 cameras. It really comes down to which features you value the most for your needs.
Thanks
Hay man witch is best for distance and paranormal investigations?
You would probably be better off with the Seek ShotPro - it's a bit cheaper and offers higher IR resolution at 320x240. That said, neither manufacturer has published an official range statistic for these cameras since they are really intended for industrial and mechanical troubleshooting, home inspections, HVAC, and automotive repairs. For something a bit more suited to outdoor use at longer ranges check out the Seek RevealPRO at the link below. It's around the same price and has an advertised range of up to 1,800ft: www.tequipment.net/Seek-Thermal/RevealPRO/Building-and-Industrial-Thermal-Imagers/
Sorry if I missed this basic thing in the video, but do these record video? Or photo only?
Neither camera is able to record radiometric (thermal) video. You can only capture radiometric still images.
Thank you
Might you recommend a thermal video recorder, low end price, for wildlife?
We don't carry anything specifically for recording thermal videos, but our experts might be able to point you in the right direction. We have thermographers on-staff who are experts in all areas of professional thermal imaging. Feel free to call us at (877) 571-7901, email Sales@TEquipment.net, or live chat on www.tequipment.net/ during business hours.
@@iknowhatisaw check out the FLIR Scout TK. It’s their low end thermal monocular. A little dated (no WiFi and no Bluetooth) but it takes video (no audio however). Decent little thermal that won’t give away position at night since there’s no bright LCD screen. Guessing that might be something to check out. Rechargeable via micro USB and transfer pics/video to computer via USB connection too.
If giving away position isn’t a necessity then another option is to check out the FLIR One Pro which connects to your iPhone/Android and can also save video. You get all the core FLIR UX/UI on your phone including MSX.
Had my tonsils removed under this anaesthetic
7:43 .... I really dont need more..... Seek Thermal ShotPRO is just much better option. What I need more, than better thermal images? Flir has just much better advertising. They now, how to do something from nothing. Reports....cloud... You just dont need that. If there is an option how to donwload this great images from Seek to PC, what do you need more? You can edit them and make report from them. And Cloud?? I have much of space on my PC for these files.....
Sometimes it seems to me that Flir explicitly deceives / scam customers. Why is better sharp-edge no thermal camera to me? Thermal images are what I am interested in. Again there with scam .... Sharp edges give the impression of a better image, but we are talking about thermal images and Flir definitely ... I repeat ... DEFINITELY Flir doesn't has!
I'm a little surprised by you that you don't say unequivocally that Seek is simply better for thermal images. You're talking about algorithms for Flir, yet it just smoothing the mistakes that are there as well. But thank you very much for the video, because after I saw that images I am definitelly going for Seek :-)
Many of our professional users prefer FLIR because of the excellent additional features like FLIR Tools for easy reporting. MSX does make a huge difference when you're doing inspections of equipment and buildings because it gives you context of what you're looking at. Cloud connectivity is also nice for super fast image review by colleagues. That said, Seek does have better thermal images because of the higher resolution - if that's your main concern, then you should go for the ShotPRO.
Thanks alot for this wonderful video 👍
Notice that the ShotPro’s hardware is better, while the C5’s software is better
C5 will not transfer photos to your phone. When it works it will upload them to ignite and then you download them from ignite.
That's correct - you must upload the images to FLIR Ignite Cloud first then from there you can download them from the cloud to your devices. Sorry if it was unclear in the video.
@brain fog thats correct, flir says that you have to inform your cleint that flir wil use the foto’s
I honestly think that MSX looks ugly
ahahaahhah this joy man))))))))
640X480??? What a fail.
The ShotPro has 320x240 infrared resolution, the C5 has 160x120 resolution. If you want 640x480 you're going to have to spend a lot more money - the cheapest camera we sell with that resolution is over $7,000. You can browse them all here: www.tequipment.net/thermal-imagers/building-and-industrial-thermal-imagers/#/thermal-imagers/building-and-industrial-thermal-imagers/detector-size_640x480sensor/?F_Sort=3
Seriously, he needs to talk louder and put more into his emotional tone. I started to fall asleep when listening to his quiet monotone voice! Personally in my opinion, the seek shot pro seems better for electronics but the C5 seems better for electrical conduit and thermal differential due to insulation deficiency.