Your statement is exaggerated and inaccurate brother. The Archimedes principal is crucial, and i repeat, it is absolutely fundamental to the study of Fluid mechanics. And any Physicist or Engineer would tell you that fluid mechanics is the bed rock of many areas of science and technology which directly impact all our lives. Humanity would not be able to advance in many fields if we didn't have this principle with us. And Archimedes came up with this principle by means of experimentation. To say that all that Greeks did was Natural Philosophy and no experimentation is not an accurate statement.
No doubt, the Muslims like Ibn Al Haytham were crucial for the Scientific method to be fully realised. But to say that no one before the Muslims engaged in any form of emperical sciences is inaccurate. Aristotle for example was know to have conducted experiments in somewhat of a similar way to that of the scientific method. Although much more primitive in its procedures. Still, credit needs to be given where due.
You are confusing two things.. science from muslims and science from islam are two different things. For example, a muslim may make a spaceship with speed of light but that does not imply it is because of islam
@@dinoraul119 well actually yes it is , the seeking if knowledge was heavily stressed in Islamic teachings and it's actually a worship better than fighting for the sake of islam, in order to get any advancements or flourishing in science you have to get people who are actually interested in seeking knowledge and in science in the first place, and not only that but also ethical and moral use of science , that's why islam is the reason Muslims were so advanced in science without the teachings you would get a society that was the same as ones that were neighboring it
Brothers you hit a major point around the 13 minute mark which I wrote my dissertation about. Especially when you look at enlightenment arguments against "religion" but quickly realise its actually arguments against Christianity, many of which do not apply to Islam. An example is spinoza's argument against miracles.
@@markward3981 he said miracles are something we dont understand , in a sense where angels and god is portrayed as fairy tales spinoza is correct here as angels are just another creation like human are different creation and jinns are a different creation and stars and planets are a different creation and we think we are superior when we dont understand it. ignorance
on the last point about atheism inhibiting science, you should look up creatorgate. Dr.Eyad qunaibi did an excellent summary in his arabic channel explaining the timeline of events; In short, a chinese researcher wrote a paper in a chinese journal studying the human hand, in his summary he praised the craftsmanship of the 'creator'. this one line caused the western atheists to throw a temper tantrum, blue haired twitter mob style, demand retractions, and eventually severely lower the journal's overal 'quality score'. an entire science journal got cancelled because they couldn't handle one publication where someone implied there was a creator. those atheists are guilty of the zealotry they attribute to others.
Ibn Khaldun said, “The vanquished always want to imitate the victor in his distinctive characteristics, dress, and all his other conditions and customs”. إن المهزوم مولع بتقليد المنتصر، أبن خلدون
Pythagorism emerged from earlier tradition (Orphic tradition). Yet, Greeks claimed it as mere philosophy. Then philosophy being taken an end by itself transformed epistemology. In that sense the Greeks inaugurated modern world crisis by replacing wisdom (supra natural and traditional) with profane science/philosophy (purely human and purely rational)'. Renaissance is therefore the beginning of the Dark age as it also is characterized by profane science/ philosophy: 1) lacks first principles, 2) accumulation of unfounded hypothesis and, 3) insignificant details. When Muslims scientists were in charge, they changed the game by just inserting the concept of God in to scientific and philosophical enquires. Which grounded them firmly in to first principles. As sphere of universal principles is equivalent to sphere of metaphysics, their grounding in Tawheed helped them to access essentials of reality/truth through intellectual intuition. That is why their discoveries is still in use at every sector. From Algebra to Optics through medical surgeries and medicinal plants, what they gave us is still in use. Their accuracy is directly related to their principal methodology. On the flip side, The Modern world has lost its depth and no longer begins in certainty or truth, but aim only at applications. Hence it ends up confusing science and industry. If it is applicable at the moment, no scientist cares about the metaphysical/reality/truth. Newtonian physics though applicable, the emergence of Quantum physics falsifies it. Darwin is going to end up the same at some point , but how many wars did it instigate, and how many lives lost because of it. Who cares, Modern world keeps confusing science and application. 👉 Summarized from different chapters in 'Crisis of the Modern world' by René Guénon.
Important point: Hellenic culture (ancient Greek city states and Alexander's empire/successor states) had much more cultural, ethnic, philosophical etc exchange and relations with the ancestral peoples of the many peoples who belong to Islam in modern times. Alhamdulillah. Some evidence: 1. The Greek script itself decends from an adaptation of the semitic Phoenicians script. Later going on to influence the Latin and Cyrillic script. 2. When Alexander went marching he didn't go to France or Germany, he went with his armies to Anatolia, Syria, Iraq, Filistin, Egypt, Persia, Afghanistan, Central Asia(Alexandria Eschatae) and Sindh. Some of successor states lasted for centuries. Examples: Ptolmeic Egypt, Selecusia, Greco-Bactrian Kingdom, and its successor Indo-Greek Kingdom. They were not known as Greeks in the east at this time but as Yuna(Ionians).
No doubt Al Khwarizmi (May Allah have mercy on him) invented Algebra as we know it today. But we as muslims have to acknowledge that the Hindu numericals which he adopted were crucial to many of his works. The mathematical concept of zero was crucial to the development of modern mathematics which the world inherited from the hindus.
The entire "my invention," "your invention" argument is futile, don't you think? All knowledge is from Allah, and all knowledge has been sent down by Allah through various nations and times
Mr Hijab as you know you will find the equivalent of yourself, in terms of evaluating historical events, cultural clashes, etc,, in all other nations. You are not an exception. Trying to demean Greek philosophy, logic, mathematics, is a favourite passtime of philosophers and historians from all walks of life.
Timing is not suitable for ppl of the subcontinent. If possible, do think abt it. Yes we can watch later, but everyone wants to be in live. Jazakallah, may Allah bless u all
Muslims now exist all over the world (alhamdulillah). So its not possible to cater to every region. I'm from Nepal and I don't mind not being able to see live
@@AtheistReligionIsCancer Surah al-Kahf 83-101 Translation (Yusuf Ali) 83. They ask thee concerning Zul-qarnain. Say, “I will rehearse to you something of his story.” 84. Verily We established his power on earth, and We gave him the ways and the means to all ends. 85. One (such) way he followed, 86. Until, when he reached the setting of the sun, he found it set in a spring of murky water: Near it he found a People: We said: “O Zul-qarnain! (thou hast authority,) either to punish them, or to treat them with kindness.”
The way I see it is that science is an insufficient tool to fully understand our reality. As human beings, we simply do not have the intellect, scope and knowledge sufficient enough for us to fully understand the grandeur of existence. Therefore, it is only logical to assume a higher power such as god must exist.
The digital revolution wouldn't have happened without a lot of things. To name a few : -Electricity -MOSFET Transistors - Internet -Digital Logic -Integrated circuit Chips And many more... And even if cryptography formed the base of some of the above mentioned technologies, the entire credit of Cryptography doesn't all go to our Muslim Ancestors. Science has always been a combined effort.
@@insaanabdulla4522 the internet it self wouldn't have been possible without cryptography, if we follow your logic we can reduce every advancement in humanity to its basic elements, but would that make it insignificant?
@@balarab1 the internet in its entirety wouldn't be possible? Don't you think that a bit of a stretch brother? I'm not computer scientist, so please do correct me if I am wrong, but cryptography is crucial for encryption of data. This is what keeps the information on the internet safe and secure. The role of cryptography is primarily related to encryption of data then. But would the internet not exist at all if there was no encryption? Not at all! The concept, the idea, the functioning of the internet would still exist, although without encryption, information would surely not be protected.
@@insaanabdulla4522 It's a bit complicated but internet is a network between computers, any network if not encrypted on fundamental protocol bases will be a mess, every device can access and edit all information without a way to stop it. nothing even near the internet that we know today will be possible and the project will be canceled from its beginning.
The main reason Muslims translated Greek texts were to strengthen their religion and improve their health.. Not because they were inspired by Greek thinking.
The greek of that day was an egyptian, athenian, constantinoplean, half-persian and kretian greek. They are more middle eastern than european. The european of the nordic and the west just want to claim greek taking out of its relationship with east. The eurocentric west is doing that to boast his false pride. Not that Sweden had to do with Greece or Has to do with it now than their immediate neighbours that they shared culture, religion and science. The eurocentrics project their wishes and the blondman identity on that brown world of the mideterranean sea. Both the Romans, the Greeks were first or second citizens of Alexandria, Tunis, Gaza and Istanbul. No need to project the modern political & religious identity of today on the past. Particularly when it is about ethnogeographically similar nations.
@@geesihalas6590 That's a myth propagated by authors and religions jealous of Greek achievement. In the Olympic Games in Greece from 1000 BCE, only Greeks participated, from all the parts of Greece. Greeks have been living in Greece for thousands of years..indigenous.
Learning our religion from confused filthy pagans 🤣 muslim scholars heavily refuted Greek delusions even mocked them. And no the Greeks were not special to us, we took knowledge from many other civilisations which were fat superior than grooks
@@akhlaqali1139 Buddy, you are deluded big time, and lied to. Without Greek thinking no religion, no Quran. Wake up. They are spitting on you and you think its raining .
Based on your talk, are you saying that Islam needs to become a world hegemonic power ala Great Britain or USA? African theorists are saying pretty much the same. Is this a sane attitude or desire to adopt and promote?
You mention finding coal in Britain, but coal without innovation is useless. The Arabs had oil but couldn’t even dig it out of the ground. You’re missing a key ingredient: innovation and a passion for invention thar existed in the culture then, the same one that existed in the Islamic golden age. 😊
The real shift in Europe happen in 1815 with the treaty of Vienna directly after the defeat of Napoleon… this new found unity in Europe allowed this civilization to advance under a new unified European front. The Muslim’s fractured and started in fighting Mohammed Ali Pasha’s rebellion, the first Ottoman-Wahabbi war etc… this allowed Europe to capitalize and advance on Eygpt… once they opened the Suez, they were able to better supply their troops in India which resulted in their victory over the Mughals…. And the rest is Victorian History!
The WHY (purpose) question can't be answered by science, nor can it be answered by religion. It's an impossible to answer question and therefore useless. Religion claims it does answer it but gets no further than cry "god" and "goddidit" However, that's doesn't explain a thing. It doesn't get us any further in understanding. It is begging the question and as such a fallacy in itself. Therefore, it is not a category fallacy since the "why question", as impossible to answer, clearly belongs to another category than the WHAT and HOW questions, which are possible to answer.
Religions, doesnt matter which ones, mostly answer the why question regardless of how true people think they are, because most of them either believe in afterlife or reincarnation etc, i.e immortal consciousness or soul. They are theories based on either ignorance or philosophy. On the other hand, science promotes nihilism. There is absolutely no reason to exist, due to the fact that we die. For every action there is a reaction but when you look at the big picture of human life, you wont get a reaction for your action but death/nothingness which is not a reaction. İf we were immortal there would then be no reason to beg these questions and religions would be fewer and lighter in importance.
Aaron Bruder du liegst richtig es geht nicht darum, dass du uns das Essen vorschreibst, auch wenn du uns das empfehlst was du selber konsumierst, im Endeffekt motivierst du uns, uns gesund zu ernähren.🩵
1:00:50 It is common descent that is evidentially on par with heliocentrism. Not the theory about mechanism. None of the third way scientists dispute that common descent is an established fact comparable to the earth orbitting the sun. And Dawkins never claimed natural selection is as secure as this. He explicitly accepts that it isn't. Only the part that refutes islam is known with certainty. Hijab is making the standard creationist error of conflating the fact of evolution with the mechanisms of evolution.
Some clarification. Can you elaborate vis a vis the facts of evolution vs the mechanism? Are you saying that the Islamic position disregards the concept of common descent? And that this common descent is something that is an established fact of evolution?
@@wandering3ngineer common descent is one thing, the mechanism of how the species diverged is another. There is some debate about mechanism, and questions about the exact role natural selection plays. But none of this casts doubt on the established fact that humans share close ancestors with chimpanzees. Which conflicts with special creation as described by the quran.
After complaining about what happened 20 years, 50 years, 100 years, and more ago, how much progress has been made in the last two years, five years, or ten years? So, what was the point of this 60 minutes video? It is time to move on!
There are no real gods There are only people that believe gods are real. The problem with using gods as explanations, apart from the fact they explain nothing, a god can be anything you need or want it to be. You are limited only by what you can imagine
How do you know there isn't a God? You lie, that's why the punishment in the hereafter is justified against you. Secondly, God explains everything, original existence, intelligent universe, consciousness, objective morality etc. etc. Atheism? The worst of *Delusions*.
@@discoveringtruth594 I know that gods don’t exist, the same way I know fairies and leprechauns and imps do not exist. There is no hereafter , death is the end. Gods don’t explain anything, There is a difference between an answer, and an explanation. Gods do not explain anything.
The Greek knowledge was more of natural philosophy, the Muslims introduced empirical sciences and scientific methodology
Yeah
Your statement is exaggerated and inaccurate brother.
The Archimedes principal is crucial, and i repeat, it is absolutely fundamental to the study of Fluid mechanics.
And any Physicist or Engineer would tell you that fluid mechanics is the bed rock of many areas of science and technology which directly impact all our lives.
Humanity would not be able to advance in many fields if we didn't have this principle with us.
And Archimedes came up with this principle by means of experimentation.
To say that all that Greeks did was Natural Philosophy and no experimentation is not an accurate statement.
No doubt, the Muslims like Ibn Al Haytham were crucial for the Scientific method to be fully realised.
But to say that no one before the Muslims engaged in any form of emperical sciences is inaccurate.
Aristotle for example was know to have conducted experiments in somewhat of a similar way to that of the scientific method.
Although much more primitive in its procedures.
Still, credit needs to be given where due.
You are confusing two things.. science from muslims and science from islam are two different things. For example, a muslim may make a spaceship with speed of light but that does not imply it is because of islam
@@dinoraul119 well actually yes it is , the seeking if knowledge was heavily stressed in Islamic teachings and it's actually a worship better than fighting for the sake of islam, in order to get any advancements or flourishing in science you have to get people who are actually interested in seeking knowledge and in science in the first place, and not only that but also ethical and moral use of science , that's why islam is the reason Muslims were so advanced in science without the teachings you would get a society that was the same as ones that were neighboring it
Brothers you hit a major point around the 13 minute mark which I wrote my dissertation about. Especially when you look at enlightenment arguments against "religion" but quickly realise its actually arguments against Christianity, many of which do not apply to Islam. An example is spinoza's argument against miracles.
What were Spinozas argument against miracles. Plz tell
How can we read your dissertation? Do you have a link please?
@@sil3ntsoldier236
Better to do research and educate yourself. That is beyond a TH-cam comment.
@@markward3981 he said miracles are something we dont understand , in a sense where angels and god is portrayed as fairy tales spinoza is correct here as angels are just another creation like human are different creation and jinns are a different creation and stars and planets are a different creation and we think we are superior when we dont understand it. ignorance
Also, Mohammed didn't fly on horse...
this channel needs more attention. allahumma barik lahu..
I feel like sitting with these brothers mashaALlah
on the last point about atheism inhibiting science, you should look up creatorgate. Dr.Eyad qunaibi did an excellent summary in his arabic channel explaining the timeline of events; In short, a chinese researcher wrote a paper in a chinese journal studying the human hand, in his summary he praised the craftsmanship of the 'creator'. this one line caused the western atheists to throw a temper tantrum, blue haired twitter mob style, demand retractions, and eventually severely lower the journal's overal 'quality score'. an entire science journal got cancelled because they couldn't handle one publication where someone implied there was a creator. those atheists are guilty of the zealotry they attribute to others.
I was really waiting for these topics to be discussed from your side, very informative session. JazakAllah khairan.
Ibn Khaldun said, “The vanquished always want to imitate the victor in his distinctive characteristics, dress, and all his other conditions and customs”.
إن المهزوم مولع بتقليد المنتصر، أبن خلدون
Hafadhakum Allah wa Barakah fiykum wa zadakum min fadlihi Ustadhuna aljaleel ameen
Ameen
@@MS-Hussain No. Camel urine cannot cure stomack pain. Where did you dig up that bs?
@@AntiAtheismIsUnstoppable 🐷 Urine will surely cure u ☺️
May Allah Accept your works, and make it a means of acceptance and Guidance for the Ummah!
Pythagorism emerged from earlier tradition (Orphic tradition). Yet, Greeks claimed it as mere philosophy. Then philosophy being taken an end by itself transformed epistemology. In that sense the Greeks inaugurated modern world crisis by replacing wisdom (supra natural and traditional) with profane science/philosophy (purely human and purely rational)'. Renaissance is therefore the beginning of the Dark age as it also is characterized by profane science/ philosophy: 1) lacks first principles, 2) accumulation of unfounded hypothesis and, 3) insignificant details.
When Muslims scientists were in charge, they changed the game by just inserting the concept of God in to scientific and philosophical enquires. Which grounded them firmly in to first principles. As sphere of universal principles is equivalent to sphere of metaphysics, their grounding in Tawheed helped them to access essentials of reality/truth through intellectual intuition. That is why their discoveries is still in use at every sector. From Algebra to Optics through medical surgeries and medicinal plants, what they gave us is still in use. Their accuracy is directly related to their principal methodology.
On the flip side, The Modern world has lost its depth and no longer begins in certainty or truth, but aim only at applications. Hence it ends up confusing science and industry. If it is applicable at the moment, no scientist cares about the metaphysical/reality/truth. Newtonian physics though applicable, the emergence of Quantum physics falsifies it. Darwin is going to end up the same at some point , but how many wars did it instigate, and how many lives lost because of it. Who cares, Modern world keeps confusing science and application.
👉 Summarized from different chapters in 'Crisis of the Modern world' by René Guénon.
Br Subboor is premiering/going live with a video at 7pm, which will likely go on till 8:30pm. Decisions decisions
BarakAllahu Feekum brother Hijab. A Muslim voice of reason!🤍🖤
Why Winning is Important for Muslims 32:03 - 36:00
Jazakum Allah khair Br Hijab. Great analysis as usual.
Important point:
Hellenic culture (ancient Greek city states and Alexander's empire/successor states) had much more cultural, ethnic, philosophical etc exchange and relations with the ancestral peoples of the many peoples who belong to Islam in modern times. Alhamdulillah.
Some evidence:
1. The Greek script itself decends from an adaptation of the semitic Phoenicians script. Later going on to influence the Latin and Cyrillic script.
2. When Alexander went marching he didn't go to France or Germany, he went with his armies to Anatolia, Syria, Iraq, Filistin, Egypt, Persia, Afghanistan, Central Asia(Alexandria Eschatae) and Sindh.
Some of successor states lasted for centuries. Examples: Ptolmeic Egypt, Selecusia, Greco-Bactrian Kingdom, and its successor Indo-Greek Kingdom. They were not known as Greeks in the east at this time but as Yuna(Ionians).
May Allah protect you
so amazing, thanks brothers
May Allah bless you MH ❤
No doubt Al Khwarizmi (May Allah have mercy on him) invented Algebra as we know it today.
But we as muslims have to acknowledge that the Hindu numericals which he adopted were crucial to many of his works.
The mathematical concept of zero was crucial to the development of modern mathematics which the world inherited from the hindus.
The entire "my invention," "your invention" argument is futile, don't you think?
All knowledge is from Allah, and all knowledge has been sent down by Allah through various nations and times
Who's refuting that exactly? I don't think anyone respectable in their field would ever do that.
Mr Hijab as you know you will find the equivalent of yourself, in terms of evaluating historical events, cultural clashes, etc,, in all other nations. You are not an exception. Trying to demean Greek philosophy, logic, mathematics, is a favourite passtime of philosophers and historians from all walks of life.
You are not unique either. There's trolls like you everywhere
@@hibatuadam2777 I am unique, so are you.
Timing is not suitable for ppl of the subcontinent.
If possible, do think abt it.
Yes we can watch later, but everyone wants to be in live.
Jazakallah, may Allah bless u all
Muslims now exist all over the world (alhamdulillah). So its not possible to cater to every region. I'm from Nepal and I don't mind not being able to see live
@@jaisalrw3494 right my bro.
That's why I said if it's possible. There is 5:30 difference bw India and UK. By the time they start, we go to sleep.
its pre-recorded, its not a live recording
@@jaisalrw3494 No. The sun does not set in a pool of hot water. Where did you dig up that bs?
@@AtheistReligionIsCancer Surah al-Kahf 83-101
Translation (Yusuf Ali)
83. They ask thee concerning Zul-qarnain. Say, “I will rehearse to you something of his story.”
84. Verily We established his power on earth, and We gave him the ways and the means to all ends.
85. One (such) way he followed,
86. Until, when he reached the setting of the sun, he found it set in a spring of murky water: Near it he found a People: We said: “O Zul-qarnain! (thou hast authority,) either to punish them, or to treat them with kindness.”
يعطيك العافية محمد حجاب
Assalam alaikum
Where is Hamza tzortsis channel on yt?he said he is going to have one on instagram
The way I see it is that science is an insufficient tool to fully understand our reality. As human beings, we simply do not have the intellect, scope and knowledge sufficient enough for us to fully understand the grandeur of existence. Therefore, it is only logical to assume a higher power such as god must exist.
Nice, that's the fallacy of argument from ignorance.
Correct. Good point
Explain yoga, ayurveda, veganism, evolution
I'm sure the guy who invented the cannon was a Hungarian Jew that sultan Mehmet paid in regards to Constantinople
What evidence is there that Orban was a Jew?
Actually professor George Saliba is Muslim and he is originally from Lebanon
Brother hijab please research Muslim advancements in cryptography and how all the digital revolution wouldn't have happened without it.
I can give you a video summary in Arabic about it if needed.
The digital revolution wouldn't have happened without a lot of things.
To name a few :
-Electricity
-MOSFET Transistors
- Internet
-Digital Logic
-Integrated circuit Chips
And many more...
And even if cryptography formed the base of some of the above mentioned technologies, the entire credit of Cryptography doesn't all go to our Muslim Ancestors.
Science has always been a combined effort.
@@insaanabdulla4522 the internet it self wouldn't have been possible without cryptography, if we follow your logic we can reduce every advancement in humanity to its basic elements, but would that make it insignificant?
@@balarab1 the internet in its entirety wouldn't be possible? Don't you think that a bit of a stretch brother?
I'm not computer scientist, so please do correct me if I am wrong, but cryptography is crucial for encryption of data.
This is what keeps the information on the internet safe and secure.
The role of cryptography is primarily related to encryption of data then.
But would the internet not exist at all if there was no encryption? Not at all!
The concept, the idea, the functioning of the internet would still exist, although without encryption, information would surely not be protected.
@@insaanabdulla4522 It's a bit complicated but internet is a network between computers, any network if not encrypted on fundamental protocol bases will be a mess, every device can access and edit all information without a way to stop it. nothing even near the internet that we know today will be possible and the project will be canceled from its beginning.
That guy that speaks in the background is practically whispering. I always have to strain to actually hear him, why so secretive?? 😂
how do I join the gathering as a student? 😀
numbers help us to calculate how many years it takes to produce present 8 billion human today
Yes. Exactly!
Numbers that the Muslims predecessors adopted from the hindus.
Mashallah
1:40 The four horsemen and their wife 🤣
The main reason Muslims translated Greek texts were to strengthen their religion and improve their health.. Not because they were inspired by Greek thinking.
The greek of that day was an egyptian, athenian, constantinoplean, half-persian and kretian greek. They are more middle eastern than european. The european of the nordic and the west just want to claim greek taking out of its relationship with east. The eurocentric west is doing that to boast his false pride. Not that Sweden had to do with Greece or Has to do with it now than their immediate neighbours that they shared culture, religion and science. The eurocentrics project their wishes and the blondman identity on that brown world of the mideterranean sea. Both the Romans, the Greeks were first or second citizens of Alexandria, Tunis, Gaza and Istanbul. No need to project the modern political & religious identity of today on the past. Particularly when it is about ethnogeographically similar nations.
@@geesihalas6590 That's a myth propagated by authors and religions jealous of Greek achievement. In the Olympic Games in Greece from 1000 BCE, only Greeks participated, from all the parts of Greece. Greeks have been living in Greece for thousands of years..indigenous.
Learning our religion from confused filthy pagans 🤣 muslim scholars heavily refuted Greek delusions even mocked them. And no the Greeks were not special to us, we took knowledge from many other civilisations which were fat superior than grooks
@@akhlaqali1139 Buddy, you are deluded big time, and lied to. Without Greek thinking no religion, no Quran. Wake up. They are spitting on you and you think its raining .
To strengthen their religion? So their religion was weak.
Based on your talk, are you saying that Islam needs to become a world hegemonic power ala Great Britain or USA? African theorists are saying pretty much the same. Is this a sane attitude or desire to adopt and promote?
Yes
Yes
You mention finding coal in Britain, but coal without innovation is useless. The Arabs had oil but couldn’t even dig it out of the ground. You’re missing a key ingredient: innovation and a passion for invention thar existed in the culture then, the same one that existed in the Islamic golden age. 😊
What mobile does Hijab have?
The real shift in Europe happen in 1815 with the treaty of Vienna directly after the defeat of Napoleon… this new found unity in Europe allowed this civilization to advance under a new unified European front. The Muslim’s fractured and started in fighting Mohammed Ali Pasha’s rebellion, the first Ottoman-Wahabbi war etc… this allowed Europe to capitalize and advance on Eygpt… once they opened the Suez, they were able to better supply their troops in India which resulted in their victory over the Mughals…. And the rest is Victorian History!
I think it is not the primary cause but a contributing cause. Thanks for posting. May Allah help us
@@markward3981 true the Qadr of Allah is primary!
@@RevelationvsDesires
Explain please
@@markward3981 Asalamulaikum explain what brother?
@@RevelationvsDesires
Walaikum Asalaam wa Rahmatulahi
What exactly you meant . Just for clarity. Shukran
The WHY (purpose) question can't be answered by science, nor can it be answered by religion.
It's an impossible to answer question and therefore useless.
Religion claims it does answer it but gets no further than cry "god" and "goddidit"
However, that's doesn't explain a thing. It doesn't get us any further in understanding.
It is begging the question and as such a fallacy in itself.
Therefore, it is not a category fallacy since the "why question", as impossible to answer, clearly belongs to another category than the WHAT and HOW questions, which are possible to answer.
Religions, doesnt matter which ones, mostly answer the why question regardless of how true people think they are, because most of them either believe in afterlife or reincarnation etc, i.e immortal consciousness or soul. They are theories based on either ignorance or philosophy. On the other hand, science promotes nihilism. There is absolutely no reason to exist, due to the fact that we die. For every action there is a reaction but when you look at the big picture of human life, you wont get a reaction for your action but death/nothingness which is not a reaction. İf we were immortal there would then be no reason to beg these questions and religions would be fewer and lighter in importance.
Aaron Bruder du liegst richtig es geht nicht darum, dass du uns das Essen vorschreibst, auch wenn du uns das empfehlst was du selber konsumierst, im Endeffekt motivierst du uns, uns gesund zu ernähren.🩵
Betty is….
Betty is….
Betty is….
😂😂😂😂😂😂
♥️♥️♥️
1:00:50 It is common descent that is evidentially on par with heliocentrism. Not the theory about mechanism. None of the third way scientists dispute that common descent is an established fact comparable to the earth orbitting the sun. And Dawkins never claimed natural selection is as secure as this. He explicitly accepts that it isn't. Only the part that refutes islam is known with certainty.
Hijab is making the standard creationist error of conflating the fact of evolution with the mechanisms of evolution.
Some clarification. Can you elaborate vis a vis the facts of evolution vs the mechanism? Are you saying that the Islamic position disregards the concept of common descent? And that this common descent is something that is an established fact of evolution?
@@wandering3ngineer common descent is one thing, the mechanism of how the species diverged is another. There is some debate about mechanism, and questions about the exact role natural selection plays. But none of this casts doubt on the established fact that humans share close ancestors with chimpanzees. Which conflicts with special creation as described by the quran.
🇿🇦
❤️❤️❤️❤️🌹🌹🌹🌹
Funny topic, I would have been interested if it had said islam and terrorism.. Flat earth and flying donkey rocks
After complaining about what happened 20 years, 50 years, 100 years, and more ago, how much progress has been made in the last two years, five years, or ten years? So, what was the point of this 60 minutes video? It is time to move on!
Complaining ? , watch the last minute a summary of the very educational historical points and contemporary misconceptions are mentioned.
քʀօʍօֆʍ
This guy doesnt know what he is talking about.. all those book behnd him , he didnt even read them..
please find wisdom!
Quran taught everyone including western civilisation.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
delusional
There are no real gods
There are only people that believe gods are real.
The problem with using gods as explanations, apart from the fact they explain nothing, a god can be anything you need or want it to be.
You are limited only by what you can imagine
How do you know there isn't a God? You lie, that's why the punishment in the hereafter is justified against you.
Secondly, God explains everything, original existence, intelligent universe, consciousness, objective morality etc. etc.
Atheism? The worst of *Delusions*.
I'm guessing you don't believe in justice, human rights and morality either since there's no scientific evidence for it.
@@discoveringtruth594
I know that gods don’t exist, the same way I know fairies and leprechauns and imps do not exist.
There is no hereafter , death is the end.
Gods don’t explain anything,
There is a difference between an answer, and an explanation.
Gods do not explain anything.
@@Spined1234
Why would I need scientific evidence to believe in human concepts of justice, rights , morality etc
@@mickqQ Oh so you don't need scientific evidence to believe in God, right?
Embarrassing
Step by step guide on "How to defend Islam?". 🤣🤣🤣 Brainwashing works magically.
😂😂😂
How can i attend these sessions? Are they open to everyone
Islam and science = oil and water
Mashallah