Is Social Democracy bad? | Niemietz Answers

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @kenhutchinson4782
    @kenhutchinson4782 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Another concise and informative primer. This is turning into a splendid series

  • @Combatwombat-sn7ng
    @Combatwombat-sn7ng 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Chirac and the UMP under his leadership is a good example of a centre-right party that is conservative, but interventionist and social democratic economically

  • @johnbull1152
    @johnbull1152 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    These videos are great keep it up!

  • @robsutton2841
    @robsutton2841 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great stuff, thanks Kristian

  • @paulcassidy8130
    @paulcassidy8130 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "Bleeding heart libertarian" - that's a new one on me!

  • @seniorelzappo9919
    @seniorelzappo9919 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    whos on the shirt ?

  • @ThePepush
    @ThePepush ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "Any form of capitalism is better than any form of socialism. But if you compare social democracy to more liberal version of capitalism, then it doesn't look so good anymore."
    Excuse me? The liberal bias is so strong in this one it's ridiculous. Your love for the free market and capitalism is engraved in this video so hard, that it just becomes pure propaganda and not an informational material

  • @MrBillcale
    @MrBillcale 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i would contend exceptions prove the rule

  • @MrBillcale
    @MrBillcale 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the culture of scandanvian folk would make classical liberalism disruptive to the point of impossibility

  • @MrBillcale
    @MrBillcale 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i would contend that for capitalism to survive it must adapt most if not azll aspects of social democracy, and i would also contend for "socialism" to work or funtion is a way it can gradually advance over centuries of time to "true socialism" say fully automated robot gay communism it must adapt all or most apsects of socia democracy, capitalism s not sustainable and socialism does not work, at least not yet if ever

  • @thomaswikstrand8397
    @thomaswikstrand8397 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    There's a lot of pretty silly stuff in here. Sweden and Denmark WORKED well. It's deteriorated as neoliberalism has replaced social democracy. Indeed, neoliberalism is the exact reason for basically every single problem we have.
    Me thinks you're being dishonest.

    • @osasereharold-erhabor5405
      @osasereharold-erhabor5405 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You must be ignorant to think that liberalism brought from the dark ages not conservatism or leftism

    • @thomaswikstrand8397
      @thomaswikstrand8397 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@osasereharold-erhabor5405 NEOliberalism. Also known as "Reaganomics" or "the Austrian school". It's absolutely to blame. Globally, in fact.
      Edited for clarity.

    • @osasereharold-erhabor5405
      @osasereharold-erhabor5405 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@thomaswikstrand8397 that's a lie if you even read the Austrian school you would know we live in a keynes economy since the 30s

    • @osasereharold-erhabor5405
      @osasereharold-erhabor5405 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thomaswikstrand8397 Austrian school of thought doesn't call for government interving in the economy bailing out banks their are no trade tariffs in the Austrian a and no central Bank artificially raising and lowering interest rates and we would be living under the gold standard in the Austrian school of thought neo liberalism is Friedman ideas those are Chicago boys funny enough leaders don't pay attention to them if the Austrian or neo liberalism was mainstream we wouldn't have bail out the banks and their wouldn't be government subsidies we are living closer to keynes most countries in the world are mixed economies really

    • @thomaswikstrand8397
      @thomaswikstrand8397 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@osasereharold-erhabor5405 No. Hell no. You've somehow missed the last 40 years of "Reaganomics" - aka Neoliberalism, rooted in Hayek and fathered by Friedman in Chicago. Keynesianism died in the 70s.

  • @riyadhul-hoque6851
    @riyadhul-hoque6851 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is misinformation.