Where is the next part of this video?I am unable to find your video in which you have dealt with limitations of Harrod Model as you have said in this video.
You are such an amazing tutor Andrew! But you never uploaded the video on the limitations of the model. I went through your playlist but found nothing :(
the best way of explaining an economic theory.Perhaps Economics is not that hard to understand leaving the fact that the people who explain them make them utter nonsensically complex
Hmm as an economic student I really dont find economic theory complex; on the contrary these mathematical models with assumptions are quite easy to understand (even the more complex ones) causes this one is a very basic one). BUT what is complex really is to understand how the economy REALLY works and the immense complexity of it. The most important thing really beside of course understanding the models is to be able to criticise and understand what the assumptions implies ... The most difficult areas to study are the ones who deals with the basic axioms on which other science (the more concrete ones as economics or sociology for instance) relies on in order to make their own theories. I would say its firstly philosophy (analytical, logic, epistemology,...), mathematics in particular but i would say physics would be pretty close as well.
This model is interesting to know bus so simplistic and basic that it doesn't encompass a lot of things such as the impact of a higher saving rate on the long term consumption ...
Beautiful presentation and teaching. However, I'm a little sad after learning the fact about my country's (Ghana) economic growth at the beginning of the video.
I have to criticize you for an important thing about 1 st assumtion of harrod-domar model that you wrote. Actually, İn Harrods dynamic, Savings are not lead to Investments . Ex-ante Investment have to be equal to the ex-post savings . Namely, Investment had be done , later savings pay the bill.
This is not the model. You got wrong 2 of the assumptions. This is a bad semplification that just miss the main point and argument of the proper model (instability of growth)
![[Full Episode] The Restaurant War Thailand ศึกพ่อค้าซ่าแม่ค้าแซ่บ Episode 1 | 22 ก.ย. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/BuzQ70v-UZQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Very helpful, wish you could cover another model with an explanation as simple as this.
Loved the way you explained the model. I have issues focusing on something but this video had my attention the whole time. Thanks!
u r a great tutor
Where is the next part of this video?I am unable to find your video in which you have dealt with limitations of Harrod Model as you have said in this video.
i can not believe i did not understand this model before i watched your video,thank you
You are such an amazing tutor Andrew! But you never uploaded the video on the limitations of the model. I went through your playlist but found nothing :(
thank u! I just needed to get the concept! you'd be a great teacher if you aren't already
u should make more videos on economics .. you are amazing at explaining .
Very well explained. Thank you.
Thank You!Short Precise and Clear!
This video really saved me.thanks a lot.hope you will make videos about other models too.
the best way of explaining an economic theory.Perhaps Economics is not that hard to understand leaving the fact that the people who explain them make them utter nonsensically complex
Hmm as an economic student I really dont find economic theory complex; on the contrary these mathematical models with assumptions are quite easy to understand (even the more complex ones) causes this one is a very basic one). BUT what is complex really is to understand how the economy REALLY works and the immense complexity of it.
The most important thing really beside of course understanding the models is to be able to criticise and understand what the assumptions implies ...
The most difficult areas to study are the ones who deals with the basic axioms on which other science (the more concrete ones as economics or sociology for instance) relies on in order to make their own theories. I would say its firstly philosophy (analytical, logic, epistemology,...), mathematics in particular but i would say physics would be pretty close as well.
This is a good economics explanation ,thank you.
this is so so helpful thank you so much
Thank you
But I would like to know about the criticism addressed to this model
This model is interesting to know bus so simplistic and basic that it doesn't encompass a lot of things such as the impact of a higher saving rate on the long term consumption ...
very clear explanation of harrod domar model
So helpful❤ from Ethiopia 🤝
You are awsome man 💯💯
Beautiful presentation and teaching. However, I'm a little sad after learning the fact about my country's (Ghana) economic growth at the beginning of the video.
YOU EXPLAIN IT BETTER THAN MY PROFESSOR
Thank you so much for this video. It helps me a lot for my class presentation.
thank you , you saved my ass before final exam
This is a good start. Unfortunately, there is an error at 7:40 minutes into the presentation. This can be fixed.
Brilliant. Thank you!
ty
Great video!!
Assumptions
1.S=I
2.Inv lead to change in cap stock I=∆k
3.Constant C-O ratio r=K/Y
Thank you so much
Fantastic explaination
please make vedio on solow model
thank you! that was great!
so interesting
Thank you so much!
Thank you so much, why can't the USPC guys come up with this guys teaching method...
Thank youuuu
Thank-you!
So helpful
Helpful. Thank you
well defined
thank you
Saving leads to Investment (theoretically) but is Savings = Investment??? maybe expound on that
One doubt that ∆y/y is growth rate not just ∆y
thank you!
Thanx man
I have to criticize you for an important thing about 1 st assumtion of harrod-domar model that you wrote. Actually, İn Harrods dynamic, Savings are not lead to Investments . Ex-ante Investment have to be equal to the ex-post savings . Namely, Investment had be done , later savings pay the bill.
very helpful
1:21
I think this is so importan
This is not the model. You got wrong 2 of the assumptions. This is a bad semplification that just miss the main point and argument of the proper model (instability of growth)
This is so boring