A Case of Conscience by James Blish [Spoiler Light Review][Masterpieces of SF Ep. 15]

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ส.ค. 2024
  • Episode 15 of Easton Press Masterpieces of Science Fiction Series
    • Series Announcement - ...
    • What is Manichaeism?
    Thanks for watching!
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 18

  • @Seven-Planets-Sci-Fi-Tuber
    @Seven-Planets-Sci-Fi-Tuber ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thanks, Ira. The conclusion for me is that A Case Of Conscience is confirmed to be among the must-read Sci-Fi novels.
    Personally I'll skip the others, but I'll be on the lookout for a copy of A Case.. Cheers! 7P

    • @sfwordsofwonder
      @sfwordsofwonder  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah the others are interesting but A Case of Conscience is the best of them in my opinion.

  • @Tetsujin-28
    @Tetsujin-28 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I still haven't gotten around to read those old pulp paperbacks I picked up with the Blish tales.
    Should be a fun read.
    Great content. A Case of Conscience: That was a wild tale.

    • @sfwordsofwonder
      @sfwordsofwonder  ปีที่แล้ว

      I think you will like them, and if not they are at least very short.

  • @bartsbookspace
    @bartsbookspace ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great review. I like how you described Blish’s development alligator/kangaroo “people”. I did not listen to the spoiler part, as I want to read it, but you’re high praise at the end definitely has been excited and curious. 🙌

    • @sfwordsofwonder
      @sfwordsofwonder  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks Bart, I think you will like this one. Philosophical sci-fi has traditionally been the hardest for me to get into but I'm coming around.

  • @glockensig
    @glockensig 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I've read this book but no longer have a copy.... liked the story!

  • @thesci-fished
    @thesci-fished ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice work. I recently reviewed it as well, great novel.

    • @sfwordsofwonder
      @sfwordsofwonder  ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh yes! I was waiting to finish up before watching your video. Thanks Pete.

  • @BryanM.R.-wt9eb
    @BryanM.R.-wt9eb ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ah, the old ontogeny (embryonic development) recapitulates phylogeny (evolutionary history) principle. It's a somewhat distorted simplification of how development actually proceeds, but I've always enjoyed the idea. Cool to hear it worked into a story. Sounds like there's also a Teilhard de Chardin-like priest and some Manichean versus Boethian hand wringing. Doesn't seem like standard SF fare.
    But anyway, it sounds pretty interesting to me. I think it's on my e-reader; guess I should get to it. Just as soon as I get through yet another of my Gene Wolfe reading kicks. Thanks for the video, and have a nice weekend!

    • @sfwordsofwonder
      @sfwordsofwonder  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hey Bryan, I think you'd like all 4 books. They are well researched and well written and deal with a lot of non-typical sf ideas.

  • @chrisw6164
    @chrisw6164 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I went with Cities in Flight for my first Blish. I liked book one quite a bit but the subsequent books weren’t great IMO. The writing was great but I didn’t care for the plots of the second and third CIF novel (didn’t bother with the fourth). Have not read A Case of Conscience yet.

    • @sfwordsofwonder
      @sfwordsofwonder  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think Cities will be my next Blish read, not sure when though.

  • @personmcpersonperson2893
    @personmcpersonperson2893 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looking forward to reading that one 👀

    • @sfwordsofwonder
      @sfwordsofwonder  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's a great one, hope you enjoy it as much as I did.

  • @ElicBehexan
    @ElicBehexan ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I guess your age shows, but he was writing the Star Trek stuff in the mid-1960s...

    • @sfwordsofwonder
      @sfwordsofwonder  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks! I gleaned that from the afterword of Day After Judgment (1971) by David Hartwell.

  • @richardjones7984
    @richardjones7984 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    An interesting review. You Censored out the main theme of the book trying to not spoil it, which is a shame. I remember the book from long ago and much of what you tell us I had forgotten. I'll have to read it again. The title comes from the action of the priest and its consequences, which are dire. I'm suffering from the same affliction and that is why this book is important to me on a personal level.