Faces add a challenge to denoising. Often they look "plasticy." Denoising that is acceptable with objects may ruin faces and hair. Denoising algorithms seem to be changing often, so test comparisons can quickly become outdated. ALERT: Many apps have denoise functions that work ONLY on RAW files, not JPG or TIFF files. This can be a deal breaker. Verify with a trial version that an app will work on the files you before buying.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 86 | คู่เอก "คมเพชร vs ชาติพยัคฆ์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/m3q_dRYDuU8/mqdefault.jpg)
Decent comparison 👍
Faces add a challenge to denoising. Often they look "plasticy." Denoising that is acceptable with objects may ruin faces and hair. Denoising algorithms seem to be changing often, so test comparisons can quickly become outdated. ALERT: Many apps have denoise functions that work ONLY on RAW files, not JPG or TIFF files. This can be a deal breaker. Verify with a trial version that an app will work on the files you before buying.
Dxo needs the lens compensation applied for a fair comparison. You applied sharpening in Topaz and the other ones.
I have made a new video without using any sharpening.
is it better than Lightroom denoise ?
I don't have lightroom.