What horse-pucky! The 17th century IS the 1700s. The 18th century IS the 1800s, NOT the 1900s. That is like your modern math that equates 1 + 1 with the sum of 3. What matter of tom-foolery is this? Maybe it is the failing of the uneducated simpleton or worse yet, the educated charlatan hell-bent to skew the perceptions of the influential masses. The worst form of deception is self-deception. "Get behind thee Satan and trouble me no more."
@@EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV His English would be near identical to modern English minus modern slang. It's the English that the Constitution is written in.
Yes, it is amazing how ignorant young people are these days. I'm worried about what could be causing what looks like a wave of ignorance and stupidity.
I always adore time travel romances, especially when the time traveller is from the past, and has to adjust to the present time. This film seems cute, and reminds me of "Kate and Leopold" and "The Knight Before Christmas."
@trinaq You will enjoy a series of 5 suspense/romance books by Julie McElwain (read them in order) about an FBI agent who travels back in time to 1815. Start with A Murder in Time.
@@preitydaang8238 Allen Appel and Jack Finney should get you started! Read them in order (it's important). Jack Finney: Time and Again then From Time to Time. Allen Apell: Time After Time, Twice Upon a Time, Till the End of Time, In Time of War.
I agree. I love stories like this . I also think by saying he hit his head and basically has a medical condition makes it easier for him to be accepted at first .
1787 is 18th century, not 17th century. Not to nit pick but it's weird that you refer to a man as a man but refer to women as "females" in the same sentence... 😬 Nice recap though.
@LordLuciferoeth JESUS is LORD! The Bad News- You are naturally born with a sinful nature and have broken at least one of the law (10 commandments) at least once in your life (Example: a lie) (James 2-10 says if you break one of these laws, its the same as breaking them all), so because of this you're on your way to hell already, everyone is (Romans 3-23) The Gospel (Good News): JESUS, Who is GOD in the flesh, came into the world and died for us, to free us from the curse of the law (10 commandments) and ressurected on the third day so that whosoever BELIEVES in HIM will not perish but have everlasting life! GOD said this! GOD cannot lie (Titus 1-2, Hebrews 6-18) we can lie because we are sinners. JESUS saved us already (Colossians 2 13-14) Just BELIEVE and TRUST in HIM! HIM ALONE, anyone who gives you another Gospel, whether an angel or one of us, let him be accursed, like it says in (Galatians 1 6-9) JESUS ALONE! Not religion, Trust in HIM and you will receive the GIFT of THE HOLY SPIRIT. GOD HIMSELF! JESUS said "Repent ye and BELIEVE the GOSPEL" (Mark 1-15). AMEN! AMEN! 0o0oOOooooooo
@@mmecharlotte females refers to sex organs of both humans and animals, so when you refer to woman as females it can be dehumanizing depending on the context. It sounds weird referring to men as human beings but then call woman by sex organs that could be animals in the same sentence so it comes across as even more dehumanizing than normal, most woman don’t like being referred to as females for this reason unless it makes sense contextually, especially now considering most men use it differently depending on how they view the woman, mum/sister/aunt or any other woman they don’t view badly = woman, every other woman they don’t feel respect for = females if that makes sense. now a days it’s used a lot by men to replace the word “bitches” with the same meaning, most of the time I see it now it’s meant in a derogatory way, so that when woman call them out on it they can go like “but aren’t woman females? Are you saying you’re not a woman” to make the woman feel like she’s making stuff up and gaslighting them, it’s hard to explain if you haven’t seen it yourself. Not only that it’s grammatically incorrect which means people are going out their way to be wrong just so they can call woman that, so when you pair that with everything else it comes across as insulting. There are obviously contexts where it’s better to use female, so yes woman are females to answer your question, but it just depends on how you use it that can rub people the wrong way, I.e. using men and females in the same sentence Ike this video does, also you do get woman who don’t care at all but it’s perfectly understandable that lots do care because words have meanings and I think they should be used correctly.
I'm amazed at how unfazed he is about travelling 233 years in the future. I mean if I somehow travelled to the year 2257 I would feel overwhelmed. Even with the advances of technology that has transpired over the last 30 years.
I know a guy who's not fazed by anything. He has no expression or reaction of surprise or fear. I mean, we were once in a very bad area and the local gangs started shooting at each other across the street... this guy just walked along the sidewalk like he's strolling on a sunday afternoon- no ducking, no running, no interest in what's happening across the street- nothing. I imagine this would be him.
@@epluribusunum1460 As Douglas Adams stated, "The problem with time travel has nothing to do with the enormous amount of math required to do it. The real problem is that of Verb Tense."
They didn't have full beards as a fashion back in the late 18th century, that was a late 19th century fashion. If this is a Rip van Winkle type story where he sleeps and his hair grows then his finger and toenails should also be really long.
Shows what you know about hair care from the past. Modern shampoo and conditioner often do more damage than good. Combined with modern water infused with chloride and other chemicals.
A guy from the 1700s would probably not be thought of as tall in the 21st Century. Although there were taller people (like George Washington), 18th Century men were overall significantly shorter that 21st Century men.
Yep- and it's been that way throughout history. The average height of Spanish soldiers was around 5' 5"'; that of Roman soldiers was around 5'. Tall Gallic soldiers shocked Roman soldiers of the very early Roman republic because of both their nakedness and their height (from a diet supposedly heavy on dairy products).
However, residents of the Thirteen Colonies were considered to be extraordinarily Tall by people in England; due to considerably better diets, in particular more Protein than most people, other than the wealthy or nobles. The average height of Caucasian males in the early 21st century is 5'8 to 6'2; Caucasian men in New England of the 1760's was roughly 5'5" to 5'10" so 3" less, on average. So, a taller than available man from the era would probably be considered tall in our era. Considered that British military records prove that British soldiers were 6" Taller during the Napoleonic Wars, than during WWII 1939-1945, and some 8" taller than during WWI 1914-1918!
@@paladinsix9285 Interesting info. Thanks! Excellent point about diet. Americans tend to reach closer to their genetic potential even today, and the protein that so many people want us to cut back on is the reason.
Yeah, he came from a much harder time, any positive changes to food health and technology could be something he could welcome. Interestingly other time travel stories show how other people handle the change differently especially modern travelers forced to adapt to les peaceful and advanced times.
Yeah, especially for a movie made back in the 21st century. But dude, you're not supposed to mention the Association in cross-dated internet conversation. You risk confusing people in the time you're talking to. I bet this is why you got that demotion next year.
@@Skyscraper2015 Obviously he searched for other clips of the film and heard the accent, and he's right, the accent is not correct. The American accent of today didn't exist back then, the accent would be more close to the British accent with a countryside dialect.
@@4TheRecord i actually didn't look at other clips. But in this clip, the fact they thought he was the neighbours kid, or that they didn't even mention that he spoke differently, means he spoke the same way as them.
It’s a hallmark movie, If they were going to do the conman twist it would be the conman breaking down and confessing after falling head over heels in love with the woman.
I feel sorry for the cop...All those years of working hard and trying to hook up with a lady who already had a kid...and he still got rejected. And she instead hooks up with the homeless bum wandering around her shed after only knowing him for a few days. 😮Note: The cop's story is similar to my life story. 😢
Just fyi, this movie is about an 18th century man, not a 17th century man as the title says. 18th century = 1700's. That's how it works. It makes sense if you think about it. The first century was 1-100, so the second century is 101-200 (the 100's), and so on ...
why does the title say a "17th century man" when it clearly states he is from the 18th century several times. it says he is from 1787 which is the 18th century. People are so stupid of facts now days
This script, too, travelled through time. I figure it was drafted in 1922 by Nikola Tesla in the throes of an LSD trip, and the drawer it had lain in since then, near the generators at a Niagara Falls hydroelectric power station, was subject to massive quantum energy fields. Ripe old cheese played a part, and in the fullness of time we got to where we are. I can't over-stress the cheese factor.
Tesla was trying to bring back the atmospheric energy tech that has been suppressed, but you can still see photos and video of it from some of the old World's Fairs in St. Loius, Chicago , and San Fransisco
You could talk a tiny bit slower because it’s hard to follow because too much is happening just slow down a bit. I know it’s a recap doesn’t mean you have to talk fast too.
If Lifetime Movie Network had a thing for time travel movies, this one would be a good start. except it's the girl that time travels, not the guy. (Wait a Minute, Outlander already did this. Oh, never mind.)
It's Katteskill falls? Not Katterskill point? I lived there for 25 years, never heard of it, but who am I do dispute a computer? I like to knitpick, ignore me.. Where it gets out of hand, no doctor in the world would entertain that his story could be true. It was cool they used Rip Van Winkle to set it up.
I can t imagine anyone from the past wanting to live in today s world, except for maybe the medical advancements. Also people who don t fit in society might find it appealing.
She wasn't into him, anyway. But I heard that a cute female police officer was transferred to his office and they fell in love. Their relationship is working quite well. 😊
At one point in the movie our time traveler says "im amazed by these new societal constructs", discussing such phoenomenah as women prioritising career over marriage, women doing mens labour, voting and wearing mens garments. At least in part, this movie is propaganda. A man from 1789 would certainly not be this liberal. In fact by todays standards he would be a far right extremist. At no point does he defend the values of his time, now does he show any difficulty adjusting to this alien society. Beyond his arrival, he is a modern man with modern values. A major miss of the film. So much wasted potential for conflict in the plot.
@@TheNorthernDane Wow, prejudiced a bit are we? If you don't like the premise of the movie then don't watch it. What does me being American have anything to do about it. Yes I am an Oregonian. Lived in Germany for ten years and in Asia for five plus years. Where are you from, and what different cultures have you live with?
@@jeh58 Yes. Ive met very few intelligent americans. My prejudice is founded on evidence. So when you completely missed my point, naturally concluded, and was right. Im european. Ive been around half of europe. I speak five languages. Three of them are native to me.
@@TheNorthernDane I met some Europeans that are A-holes. I don't stereotype the majority of them as such. I do understand the point you are trying to make. Was it valid, yes if that is the way the story teller was trying to go with this movie. The company who produce this is Hallmark, they do holiday card and feel good movies. That is why it is more in the fairy tale story type. Have you ever seen the movie "The Princess Bride?" It is non nonsensical but a fairy tale type of a story. Jumping to Americans unintelligent was narrow minded though. I am retired now but the iobs I've worked I've lived, ate with all kind of people from all over the world. How many Americans have you truly gotten to know?
Time travel's biggest problem is that the earth was in a far different place in 1787 than in any part of 2022. A time travel would need to be a time and space traveler to cover such an unbelievable distance.
They could always have a dentist check out his teeth. Though a thing to note, land farmers in 1700s America didn't have much of a sugar diet and therefore no tooth decay.
I doubt that women of today would be attracted to a good man from the past. Women would find his chivalrous attitude towards women offensive. Oh, there might a few women that like men with manners. Now if was a pirate they would be all over him.
nice recap. But why do you always use subtitles with sexual or pars-sexual content, man females, « all females attracted » and so on? what’s the point?
I would be leery of accepting advice from the law enforcement officer who did knowingly act with criminal intent by prosecutorial misconduct to incarcerate an innocent man who wanted to live an unfettered life.
True! I was born in 1946 in Texas and I woke up this morning in South Carolina and I was 77 years old! Amazing!! Actually, I'm very good at time-traveling!!
Speaking of "very confused," someone from 1787 is from the 18th century, not the 17th, just as someone from 2023 is from the 21st century, not the 20th. I never understand why people become confused about this. A one-year-old is in his second year, not his first: year one is already in the bank. The moment he turns two he'll be in his third year, not his second. The 17th century is already in the bank for someone from 1787, just as the 20th century is in the bank for us. He doesn't have the entire 18th century in the bank yet, but he's part-way through it, just as we're part-way through the 21st, and an 18-month old is part-way through his second year.
A 17th-century man wasn't born in 1758. An 18th-century man was.
What horse-pucky!
The 17th century IS the 1700s. The 18th century IS the 1800s, NOT the 1900s. That is like your modern math that equates 1 + 1 with the sum of 3.
What matter of tom-foolery is this?
Maybe it is the failing of the uneducated simpleton or worse yet, the educated charlatan hell-bent to skew the perceptions of the influential masses.
The worst form of deception is self-deception. "Get behind thee Satan and trouble me no more."
@@EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV His English would be near identical to modern English minus modern slang. It's the English that the Constitution is written in.
This whole AI computer voiced review is STUPID.
Yes, it is amazing how ignorant young people are these days. I'm worried about what could be causing what looks like a wave of ignorance and stupidity.
@@timtruett5184 I also wish they would GET OFF OF MY DAMN LAWN!!!!
I saw this movie a while back and enjoyed it. Quite well done. It is reminiscent of Kate and Leopold but still different from that other movie.
I always adore time travel romances, especially when the time traveller is from the past, and has to adjust to the present time. This film seems cute, and reminds me of "Kate and Leopold" and "The Knight Before Christmas."
Thank you so very much for sparing time to leave such a valuable comment.
@trinaq You will enjoy a series of 5 suspense/romance books by Julie McElwain (read them in order) about an FBI agent who travels back in time to 1815. Start with A Murder in Time.
thanks i also love time travel romances . will watch thez, pls suggest more
@@Weegeekatz cud u pls suggest more
@@preitydaang8238 Allen Appel and Jack Finney should get you started! Read them in order (it's important). Jack Finney: Time and Again then From Time to Time. Allen Apell: Time After Time, Twice Upon a Time, Till the End of Time, In Time of War.
Some would call this a spoiler. I on the other hand call it an enticement. I want to watch it now.
I agree. I love stories like this . I also think by saying he hit his head and basically has a medical condition makes it easier for him to be accepted at first .
You are absolutely right. I personally love this channel because I like spoilers.
Don't watch, it's really really bad.
😅 I was thinking, Thanks, so now I don't watch it.
Old ladies like me with short attention spans like these recaps! Lol!
This must be a Hallmark movie. So wholesome. I like how he puts that lollipop in his mouth with the wrapping still on it! 8:02 LOL!
Yes it is
it's absolute shit full of historic inaccuracies
it's the candy condom. He's playing it safe. 🙃
@@riskinhos It's called imagination. You have yours let them have theirs. I like theirs and many others do too.
All the clips are inverted left-to-right. Is that to avoid copyright issues?
Yeah, sometimes they have to, just to avoid copyright strikes.
Ted the stalker 😂. Literally appearing anywhere and everywhere to dissuade her from liking Rip.
1787 is 18th century, not 17th century. Not to nit pick but it's weird that you refer to a man as a man but refer to women as "females" in the same sentence... 😬 Nice recap though.
@LordLuciferoeth JESUS is LORD!
The Bad News- You are naturally born with a sinful nature and have broken at least one of the law (10 commandments) at least once in your life (Example: a lie) (James 2-10 says if you break one of these laws, its the same as breaking them all), so because of this you're on your way to hell already, everyone is (Romans 3-23)
The Gospel (Good News): JESUS, Who is GOD in the flesh, came into the world and died for us, to free us from the curse of the law (10 commandments) and ressurected on the third day so that whosoever BELIEVES in HIM will not perish but have everlasting life! GOD said this! GOD cannot lie (Titus 1-2, Hebrews 6-18) we can lie because we are sinners. JESUS saved us already (Colossians 2 13-14) Just BELIEVE and TRUST in HIM! HIM ALONE, anyone who gives you another Gospel, whether an angel or one of us, let him be accursed, like it says in (Galatians 1 6-9) JESUS ALONE! Not religion, Trust in HIM and you will receive the GIFT of THE HOLY SPIRIT. GOD HIMSELF! JESUS said "Repent ye and BELIEVE the GOSPEL" (Mark 1-15). AMEN! AMEN! 0o0oOOooooooo
@@mmecharlotte females refers to sex organs of both humans and animals, so when you refer to woman as females it can be dehumanizing depending on the context.
It sounds weird referring to men as human beings but then call woman by sex organs that could be animals in the same sentence so it comes across as even more dehumanizing than normal, most woman don’t like being referred to as females for this reason unless it makes sense contextually, especially now considering most men use it differently depending on how they view the woman, mum/sister/aunt or any other woman they don’t view badly = woman, every other woman they don’t feel respect for = females if that makes sense.
now a days it’s used a lot by men to replace the word “bitches” with the same meaning, most of the time I see it now it’s meant in a derogatory way, so that when woman call them out on it they can go like “but aren’t woman females? Are you saying you’re not a woman” to make the woman feel like she’s making stuff up and gaslighting them, it’s hard to explain if you haven’t seen it yourself.
Not only that it’s grammatically incorrect which means people are going out their way to be wrong just so they can call woman that, so when you pair that with everything else it comes across as insulting.
There are obviously contexts where it’s better to use female, so yes woman are females to answer your question, but it just depends on how you use it that can rub people the wrong way, I.e. using men and females in the same sentence Ike this video does, also you do get woman who don’t care at all but it’s perfectly understandable that lots do care because words have meanings and I think they should be used correctly.
@@hobiuary9038 women are still females tho😂
Add 1 to the hundreds.
@@hobiuary9038 Woman=Female simple!!!
I'm amazed at how unfazed he is about travelling 233 years in the future. I mean if I somehow travelled to the year 2257 I would feel overwhelmed. Even with the advances of technology that has transpired over the last 30 years.
You quickly adjust. Believe me.
I know a guy who's not fazed by anything. He has no expression or reaction of surprise or fear. I mean, we were once in a very bad area and the local gangs started shooting at each other across the street... this guy just walked along the sidewalk like he's strolling on a sunday afternoon- no ducking, no running, no interest in what's happening across the street- nothing.
I imagine this would be him.
@@domainmojo2162 has he time travelled?
When I traveled to now, I adjusted pretty quickly I think...
But he did do much better than me
@@olivere5497 no u don't
I watched this movie next month, it was pretty good.
@@epluribusunum1460 As Douglas Adams stated, "The problem with time travel has nothing to do with the enormous amount of math required to do it. The real problem is that of Verb Tense."
He has great hair, especially considering shampoo and conditioner hadn't been invented yet.
They were discovered way back in India. Ofcourse they used herbs and flowers instead of chemicals.
Of course, he also has a perfect 3-day beard stubble also!
lice didnt time travel
They didn't have full beards as a fashion back in the late 18th century, that was a late 19th century fashion. If this is a Rip van Winkle type story where he sleeps and his hair grows then his finger and toenails should also be really long.
Shows what you know about hair care from the past. Modern shampoo and conditioner often do more damage than good. Combined with modern water infused with chloride and other chemicals.
A guy from the 1700s would probably not be thought of as tall in the 21st Century. Although there were taller people (like George Washington), 18th Century men were overall significantly shorter that 21st Century men.
Yep- and it's been that way throughout history. The average height of Spanish soldiers was around 5' 5"'; that of Roman soldiers was around 5'. Tall Gallic soldiers shocked Roman soldiers of the very early Roman republic because of both their nakedness and their height (from a diet supposedly heavy on dairy products).
and not as....shall we say robust in the waist line on average! lol.
Your height-obsessing is pretty strange.
However, residents of the Thirteen Colonies were considered to be extraordinarily Tall by people in England; due to considerably better diets, in particular more Protein than most people, other than the wealthy or nobles.
The average height of Caucasian males in the early 21st century is 5'8 to 6'2; Caucasian men in New England of the 1760's was roughly 5'5" to 5'10" so 3" less, on average. So, a taller than available man from the era would probably be considered tall in our era.
Considered that British military records prove that British soldiers were 6" Taller during the Napoleonic Wars, than during WWII 1939-1945, and some 8" taller than during WWI 1914-1918!
@@paladinsix9285 Interesting info. Thanks! Excellent point about diet. Americans tend to reach closer to their genetic potential even today, and the protein that so many people want us to cut back on is the reason.
The most unbelievable part of the story is how he thinks everything in 2022 is fabulous.
Life was harder back then.
Yeah, he came from a much harder time, any positive changes to food health and technology could be something he could welcome. Interestingly other time travel stories show how other people handle the change differently especially modern travelers forced to adapt to les peaceful and advanced times.
He comes from the civil war era, for one of that time, 2022 is fabulous
I would have taken an iphone and a XBOX back to the past...and changed human history...Muhahahahahah!😆
@@tiagopatricio3805 the civil war didn’t start until 80 years after his time. He comes from the revolutionary era.
As a member of a Time Travel Association, i confirm this movie is pretty accurate.
How come your society never went back and killed baby Hitler?
😂😂🤣
Can I join
Please tell me your serect so i can go back in time to my ex girlfriend cheating on me and break everything she owns
Yeah, especially for a movie made back in the 21st century. But dude, you're not supposed to mention the Association in cross-dated internet conversation. You risk confusing people in the time you're talking to. I bet this is why you got that demotion next year.
This is actually a pretty good Hallmark movie. Loved it.
They hit a home run about every 10th movie. The Xmas movies this year were just so bad
I love (The Most Wonderful Time of the Year) movie with Henry Winkler in.
That's one for the fortune tellers - "you will meet a tall, dark stranger...by the turnips."
They cannot afford to hire a helper at the farm, but they can afford a psychiatrist and surgery.
ha, so true
I liked the story and the recap. Thanks to the author/creator of the recap.
She's wearing men's jeans to protect her family.. If you don't know, now you know!!
Please cut out the ceaseless music.
The actress playing Sarah is currently in the show Chicago Med as Dr Natalie.
She's cute and elderly.
The fact he had the same accent as them is highly unlikely
But we don't know how he spoke cos all we heard was the narrator speaking.
@@Skyscraper2015 Obviously he searched for other clips of the film and heard the accent, and he's right, the accent is not correct. The American accent of today didn't exist back then, the accent would be more close to the British accent with a countryside dialect.
@@4TheRecord i actually didn't look at other clips. But in this clip, the fact they thought he was the neighbours kid, or that they didn't even mention that he spoke differently, means he spoke the same way as them.
In all likelihood, they would barely be able to understand him, if at all.
american and british accents around the american revolution were just like the american accent of today. they changed, we stayed the same.
What the name of this movie
Was hoping for the he’s actually a con artist plot twist
She should sent him back to grab some valuable stuff from the 1700's...then he could return and make her rich.
It’s a hallmark movie,
If they were going to do the conman twist it would be the conman breaking down and confessing after falling head over heels in love with the woman.
Good video, but 1787 is 18th century though. 17th century would be between 1600 and 1699
Well, technically 1601 to 1700 😋 since first century was from 1 to 100 (no year zero)
1601~1700
Name of movie?
Is it possible if i can get the title of the movie 🤔
I feel sorry for the cop...All those years of working hard and trying to hook up with a lady who already had a kid...and he still got rejected. And she instead hooks up with the homeless bum wandering around her shed after only knowing him for a few days. 😮Note: The cop's story is similar to my life story. 😢
That story is actually very very common.
He seems like a douche.
Why would you want to be with a woman who all ready has kid's?
@@devriestown I'd rather have a single woman with no kids...who likes to go to the gym and keep in shape.
@@devriestown Sometimes is what we can do with our budget 🤣 (the classic financial, beauty and coolest personality package)
Um, 1787 is the *eighteenth* century, not the 17th. (Apologies if a hundred people pointed this out already.)
Happy Ending for Everyone, except for the police officer. 🤣
That girl is so photogenic and has beautiful facial bone structure !
This was a very interesting and beautiful movie
awhhhh =), love the happy stories , thanks
I enjoyed this recap ❤
This is so funny but i don't think cop is a villan too he is rightfully worried
Sexual competition.
He became a villain when he tried to bring Rip down. He did so not because of is worry, but because of jealousy.
@@saranshmaurya6905 still not a villan though, the cop just had a low and shameful moment
Just fyi, this movie is about an 18th century man, not a 17th century man as the title says. 18th century = 1700's. That's how it works. It makes sense if you think about it. The first century was 1-100, so the second century is 101-200 (the 100's), and so on ...
You solved my 2 decade old question today.
great thanks friend
is this a hallmark channel movie?
why does the title say a "17th century man" when it clearly states he is from the 18th century several times. it says he is from 1787 which is the 18th century. People are so stupid of facts now days
That is a fact that is VERY confusing...
Yes they are
Editing video in so slow motion is somehow weird, cause you dont feel the movie fast pace and squences......
Looks like a movie I would enjoy watching. Sadly, it is not available to citizens living on Guam (US Territory).
VPN. Use it to be from wherever you want to be from...
I rented it on Amazon. DON'T. It's truly bad writing, dialog, and acting.
The cop should try and hookup with the doctor instead of the widow lady and child.
Why do the buttons move from one side of her jacket to the other (6:24) and writing on the badge and car is back to front?.
@@orsonkart9886 mirrored video
If you are doing a recap on on a time travel movie, you should take take a few moments to learn calendars, 1787 is 18th century.
What's the name of this movie ?
This script, too, travelled through time. I figure it was drafted in 1922 by Nikola Tesla in the throes of an LSD trip, and the drawer it had lain in since then, near the generators at a Niagara Falls hydroelectric power station, was subject to massive quantum energy fields. Ripe old cheese played a part, and in the fullness of time we got to where we are. I can't over-stress the cheese factor.
Tesla was trying to bring back the atmospheric energy tech that has been suppressed, but you can still see photos and video of it from some of the old World's Fairs in St. Loius, Chicago , and San Fransisco
LSD did not exist in 1922.
Please tell me the name of background music
I would like to watch this movie. What is the title and where can I find it?
At the beginning of the video: Rip in Time
You could talk a tiny bit slower because it’s hard to follow because too much is happening just slow down a bit. I know it’s a recap doesn’t mean you have to talk fast too.
A.I. was weak in this vid. The better ones cost money
So there were no De Lorean in the 18th century?
Re the title, if he's a 17th Century man, why is the action set in 1787- which is in the 18th century
I loved the ending of this story
A truly beautiful love story.. :)
If Lifetime Movie Network had a thing for time travel movies, this one would be a good start. except it's the girl that time travels, not the guy. (Wait a Minute, Outlander already did this. Oh, never mind.)
It's Katteskill falls? Not Katterskill point? I lived there for 25 years, never heard of it, but who am I do dispute a computer? I like to knitpick, ignore me.. Where it gets out of hand, no doctor in the world would entertain that his story could be true. It was cool they used Rip Van Winkle to set it up.
Whoever named this video is wrong. 1787 is the late 18th Century, not the 17th Century.
I can t imagine anyone from the past wanting to live in today s world, except for maybe the medical advancements. Also people who don t fit in society might find it appealing.
You probably have a very romantic fiew of the past
How about toilets, absence of brutal tortures to name a couple?
You wouldn't say that if you were a POC.
@@karinland8533 And you probably have a romantic view of the present. Somehow this is never discussed.
@@ricardog2165 If you're not a BIPOC then you would want to live in the past and why not? You should not try to think as a BIPOC if you aren't one.
1787 is in the 18th Century, not the 17th Century. Please update the title.
Kate and Leopold movies plot... Hugh Jackman , Meg Ryan movie
Name movie plz❤
8:42 1758 is not the 17th century but the 18th
Sorry, I couldn't watch your review. I went to ROKU and found this on demand on Peacock, so I'm watching it now.
I would actually like to see this movie. Seems it’s allot better than what Hollywood actually puts out today.
Can any1 please tell me the name of intro song
Mid-1800s is the 19th century, genius.
It's happy ending for every one, what about that police officer
😆
She wasn't into him, anyway. But I heard that a cute female police officer was transferred to his office and they fell in love. Their relationship is working quite well. 😊
Should've lured him into the cave and sent him back to the 18th century 😂
This was a very good movie.
She tells him about her "baby daddy" Really? LMFAO. I thought she was just going to tell him about her son's father, but what do I know.
Plot twist...after marrying him and having children...she discovers he's her great great great grandfather...😮
@@rayharvey1330 😂 This should be a main comment not a hidden one. Lol
Just loved my friend.
Remarkable love story
At one point in the movie our time traveler says "im amazed by these new societal constructs", discussing such phoenomenah as women prioritising career over marriage, women doing mens labour, voting and wearing mens garments. At least in part, this movie is propaganda. A man from 1789 would certainly not be this liberal. In fact by todays standards he would be a far right extremist. At no point does he defend the values of his time, now does he show any difficulty adjusting to this alien society. Beyond his arrival, he is a modern man with modern values. A major miss of the film. So much wasted potential for conflict in the plot.
It is just entertainment. The story teller told it the way they wanted. If you like it or not, to each their own. It is a fantasy story, not reality.
@@jeh58 Since you so marvelously missed the point i can only assume you're american.
@@TheNorthernDane Wow, prejudiced a bit are we? If you don't like the premise of the movie then don't watch it. What does me being American have anything to do about it. Yes I am an Oregonian. Lived in Germany for ten years and in Asia for five plus years. Where are you from, and what different cultures have you live with?
@@jeh58 Yes. Ive met very few intelligent americans. My prejudice is founded on evidence. So when you completely missed my point, naturally concluded, and was right. Im european. Ive been around half of europe. I speak five languages. Three of them are native to me.
@@TheNorthernDane I met some Europeans that are A-holes. I don't stereotype the majority of them as such. I do understand the point you are trying to make. Was it valid, yes if that is the way the story teller was trying to go with this movie. The company who produce this is Hallmark, they do holiday card and feel good movies. That is why it is more in the fairy tale story type. Have you ever seen the movie "The Princess Bride?" It is non nonsensical but a fairy tale type of a story. Jumping to Americans unintelligent was narrow minded though. I am retired now but the iobs I've worked I've lived, ate with all kind of people from all over the world. How many Americans have you truly gotten to know?
Why is the writing on the sheriff’s car alternately backward and forward?
Helps with avoiding a copyright strike if video is mirrored, but doesn't always prevent it if much of it is symmetrical.
@@MikinessAnalogIn the UK the writing on the front of emergency vehicles is reversed so that it can be read when looking in your driving mirror
nice movie
"17th Century Man Accidently Travels In Future" Except he's from 1789, which was in the 18th century.
Must have done some more time travel
Star Trek did some time travel themes, the one with Khan was great specially it was far more realistic than this film.
It was a happy ending for everyone except for Ted.
Time travel's biggest problem is that the earth was in a far different place in 1787 than in any part of 2022. A time travel would need to be a time and space traveler to cover such an unbelievable distance.
3:15 Rip van Winkel?
Grate film
Man from a functioning society travels forward in time to a society in decline, 2022, colourized.
She's super cute.
The Bohr atom? Not on a physicist's board!
This was actually a very good movie, well done, and I don't particularly like Hallmark romantic movies.
I kept waiting for him to run into black people lol.
And trans, and bikers, and leather-men, and mardi-gras. And all those advertisements for strip joints, "themed" clubs.
@SiewHei Lou He would've died in utter disbelief of human stupidity.
1:52 sahara
They could always have a dentist check out his teeth. Though a thing to note, land farmers in 1700s America didn't have much of a sugar diet and therefore no tooth decay.
Tell that to George!
Sugar isn't the only thing to cause tooth decay.
Why did you slow down the video , it is making it bad
Your title is ONE HUNDRED years off.
I was mad at her but her randomly saying I believe you was cute 😊😊😊
IOf he's from 1787, that's the 18th century, not 17th.
How is not having a record, "not checking out" ?
“Her baby daddy”. Lol
Wish I could travel through time.
@@jasonmarin8187 just walk across time zone lines
That was a lovely story.
Who else thought of John Marston when rip remembered his name?
I doubt that women of today would be attracted to a good man from the past. Women would find his chivalrous attitude towards women offensive. Oh, there might a few women that like men with manners. Now if was a pirate they would be all over him.
Rip In Time is now one of my favorite movies of all time.
I'll pass that along to Rip Senior!
nice recap. But why do you always use subtitles with sexual or pars-sexual content, man females, « all females attracted » and so on? what’s the point?
I would be leery of accepting advice from the law enforcement officer who did knowingly act with criminal intent by prosecutorial misconduct to incarcerate an innocent man who wanted to live an unfettered life.
The story of Rip van Winkle actually takes place in the 17th century, not the 18th.
There are places with time anomalies. I know of a few real life stories like that.
True! I was born in 1946 in Texas and I woke up this morning in South Carolina and I was 77 years old! Amazing!! Actually, I'm very good at time-traveling!!
@@dough9512 🤣 right. Of course in some way we are all time travellers.
Speaking of "very confused," someone from 1787 is from the 18th century, not the 17th, just as someone from 2023 is from the 21st century, not the 20th. I never understand why people become confused about this. A one-year-old is in his second year, not his first: year one is already in the bank. The moment he turns two he'll be in his third year, not his second. The 17th century is already in the bank for someone from 1787, just as the 20th century is in the bank for us. He doesn't have the entire 18th century in the bank yet, but he's part-way through it, just as we're part-way through the 21st, and an 18-month old is part-way through his second year.