Good spot, I think the explanation is correct, but the energy levels for vibrations are not represented correctly. OF course the Stokes shift is at a lower energy and longer wavelength than the Rayleigh scatter. Thank you for paying so much attention watching out video!
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 86 | คู่เอก "คมเพชร vs ชาติพยัคฆ์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/m3q_dRYDuU8/mqdefault.jpg)
Is your Stokes and Anti-Stokes slide correct?
Good spot, I think the explanation is correct, but the energy levels for vibrations are not represented correctly. OF course the Stokes shift is at a lower energy and longer wavelength than the Rayleigh scatter. Thank you for paying so much attention watching out video!