I was a Christian for 21 years pastor at church for three years before I even heard about Dr. Ruckman, after buying his reference Bible in the 7 foot shelf and studying through it. I asked the Lord to forgive me for my stupidity and give me a fresh start, he did and I started all over again learning the Bible for the first time. I’m so very thankful for his teaching. Very thankful the Lord chose him and so very thankful of the Lord allowed me to come across this man.
What in the world are you smoking this crap isn't clear at all and leaves opens tons of errors. I recently got a good friend of mine out of this nonsense by making three videos for him. Debunking ruckman watch them. I dare you. My buddy saw the light and he left dispensationalism th-cam.com/video/oV23eHje6Og/w-d-xo.htmlsi=99AeEfXtJeZwTWDW Watch all 3 I dare you
Amen, but he finished his course, so now hopefully some of us that are still in the flesh can help to pass on his faith and our faith in the Kjv and also his sound doctrinal teaching. Sam Gipp has been preaching kjv for many years but he is getting up there in years. It is good to see that the PSR videos that post up to you tube do get many views. But most of the people, but not all are older males. Hopefully people will avail themselves of his wealth of knowledge of the book and search the scriptures for themselves and pass something on to the next generation. Yeah he may not be here in the flesh but he has left a wealth of material in books, and audio and video. God bless brother! Stay encouraged in the Lord.
@@timchess2313 Amen to that; brother ruckman indeed finished his course. That was me just being selfish for a moment wondering what his take on all that’s happened in our world since he’s been home in heaven would be… But thank you for the encouragement, I’m in my early 30s & do my best to search the scriptures as often as possible, especially with all the trials we as Christians have against us multiply. I tune into Brother Peacock, Gipp, Gene Kim, and a few other Bible believers. There’s just such a shortage for sound doctrinal teaching now. “A famine of the word” for sure.
I think the next great preaching will be done by the two witnesses. It really is starting to look like most of the "beginning of sorrows" are happening right now. I think that almost every country is at war regardless of technically declaring it.
I want to his school but yet listening to this I learn more than I did at school because in the school I was a very young Christian and I was working night shift and I was very tired during the classes since then still keeping close to Dr Ruckman going to his church from time to time and then trying to go out there in minister in this world he by far is the most influential Christian in my life second place is Lester Roloff Lester Roloff and Dr Ruckman are a good couple to have in your Arsenal for people to look up to to have a closeness to our Lord
I used to go to brother Roloffs church , but this was when Brother Roloff had already gone to heaven in 1982 and Pastor Wiley Cameron was my pastor and friend at Peoples Baptist Church and took over after Brother Roloffs graduation to heaven. Did you know that Doc and brother Roloff were very close friends and did alot of conferences together across America??? What a conference that was when these 2 giants in the faith got together and preached.
Dr. Ruckman tried to feed God’s sheep, praise God these older recordings are still available to help us get spiritual food from the teaching and preaching of God’s word. Amen. Praise God There is much material on TH-cam by Dr Ruckman ( visit Don Nesbitt TH-cam channel and some others) and also visit Bible Baptist Bookstore online to purchase materials in case you didn’t know.
Good to hear from you, thanks for the prayers. Hope you are doing well. God bless. Are you interested to post any Ruckman videos to your channel. I have a few more but not sure if the Lord wants me to post any more, not sure. It is a long story but maybe my motives for youtube channel not right or something. Or if you can tell how to contact D.N. maybe he could do it. I tried messaging him through utube but did not hear back. Yeah I like youtube and putting out videos and responding to heresy in the comments and friends through Comments like yourself but had an accident just before July 4 that got my attention and was thinking the Lord may have been telling me to stop with youtube or Ruckman on youtube or whatever. I posted this last video because I know the man who gave me this material is blessed to see it going out for many to see, saved and lost, and also as bait to see if someone would comment who I felt confident entrusting these videos and audios to post.
Thank you Pastor Ruckman for declaring the wisdom of the LORD. Our nation's leadership need the Salvation of CHRIST JESUS. We need to draw nigh to GOD and HE will draw nigh to us; and the devil will flee from us.
I constantly see people claiming that Peter Ruckman and their favorite term for us "Ruckmanites" are hyper-dispensationalists! Funny stuff! Many are Pastors who have been indoctrinated by men who are too puffed up to ever consider that maybe he was simply more devoted to that book than they were! My understanding of the Scriptures took off like a Cheetah chasing a Gazelle when I discovered this man's teaching! Got me in my KJV I'll tell ya that!
They called me that. The ones that think salvation has always been saved by grace, Jews were looking forward to the cross. Called one out on the pulpit after him and his group tried challenging me. One of there wives screamed, cursed and threatened me in the church. So happens I don’t go there anymore, a lot needed fixed. Word of advice, don’t rely on anyone that goes or graduated from Norris Bible Baptist Institute
@@TheChurchIsLikenUntoTheMoon Amen! They ignore the Scriptures and it infuriates them when you present the plain reading of the words of God. I am really starting to think that they have a spirit within them that is in conflict with the Holy Spirit. God bless you and yours!
I'm from that city and graduated that year. Wished I went to church back then I got to go to this. Lol. I have not been to a kjv convention. Though I do go to a kjv church now.
I prefer teaching that doesn’t skip around finding scriptures that agree with your premise. Why did the Church not teach dispensationalism for about 18 centuries?
@@phillipditto6590 that is a common but untrue statement. Dispensationalism is taught by believers throughout church history. Also, do you believe in an Old Testament and a New Testament? That would be a form of dispensationalism. To be honest I don’t have time and energy to try and give a thorough answer to your statements. God bless. However there a book for sale on Amazon called “Dispensationalism Before Darby” by William C Watson that may give you access to some historical eveidence of pre 1800’s dispensational teachings.
It's pretty funny that you weren't met with anything other than nunt-uh. It's hard for them to actually explain things outside their echo chamber. Nothing like special revelation to scratch the itching ears of spoon fed Christians.
because he knows they're belly feeding political rats; not caring educators. a parent trusts their child to the 'system' to be 'educated' result is democrats, blm and antifa
Funny enough, the first time I heard about dispensationalism I was told by somebody following it that you cannot use John 3:16 because it's not for us and it's not the right message and you can't get saved from it. But they also say there's no grace before Paul. The John 3:16 is talking about Grace.. because "for God so loved the world is grace.
@@REAL88E rightly dividing the word means just that. To say Kingdom of heaven to a gentile they are not going to understand what you're saying versus a Jew. It's simply means not adding two or taking away when you are rightly dividing the same Truth for one individual that will understand what you're saying versus the other that will not. Before the resurrection they preach the gospel to both Jew and gentile just the same as Paul did after the resurrection. There is many scripture proving my point. There is only one gospel and there is only been one gospel since creation and that's the gospel and salvation of Jesus christ. Regardless of what time period
@@telefellavisionYour misunderstanding of what dispensationalists believe about grace is apparent. God has always had grace but not to all men for free salvation revealed thru Paul. Noah found grace but he had to build the ark or he would have not been saved. Paul was saved ( enduring to the end) into the earthly kingdom program and move from faith to faith to be sealed by the gospel of the grace of God revealed in 1 cor t5 :1-4 KJV Paul is the only apostle for this age....Galatians 2:7-9 KJVS But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; [8] (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:) [9] And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.
@@telefellavisionlol actually he beats down mid acts Hyper dispensationalists and teach mostly what they teach in a lot of cases. Lol example he tares down a false claim about acts transitions which no mid acts believe then he states our Pauline position as his. Lol acts transit from law to grace and at the end of acts the earthly Israel kingdom was ended. Actually was not ended but postponed. Lol paper tigers all in this video
I just listened to a 30 min video of someone trying to debunk dispensationalism. He completely misrepresented dispy theology, and used strawman arguments, and didn’t know what he was talking about. It was frustrating because he had comments turned off on his video so I couldn’t refute his claims.
At what point does he start talking about dispensational salvation please? I got two four-and-a-half minutes in, but he still hadn't started talking about it.
@@JamesBrown-fd1nv What sort of nasty reply is that??? Oops! Now you've gone and got yourself: MUTED 👈 BLOCKED 👈 SILENCED 👈 From ever speaking to me again. Pity. Goodbye. P.S. Love is patient, love is kind, love does not demand all its own way . . . shouting and bawling until it gets it's own way. Goodbye P.S. If you choose to listen to a Windbag, that's your choice. Don't criticise others that don't want to listen to a Wingbag!
@@joshmccartney777 Here's something else which isn't very nice. There are two things that you can be sure of: When you help CHRISTIANS on TH-cam and solve their problems THEY DON'T SAY THANK YOU. When you say something that THEY believe is wrong They are QUICK to jump in and CRITICISE ! Time after time after time Soooo UNGRATEFUL ! So PATHETIC ! ... ... ...
I think Ruckman was an excellent Bible teacher. The Lord, in His marvelous grace, led me to Ruckman's teachings very early on and I am extremely thankful for this. I'm watching this video because I know I still have plenty to learn through Ruckman's teachings, his reference Bible and commentaries are often the first (human) port of call if I am struggling to understand something. That said, I think that Ruckman was wrong about the Edenic covenant requiring no faith. Heb 11:7 By faith Noah, being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear, prepared an ark to the saving of his house; by the which he condemned the world, and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith. Adam was warned of God of things not seen as yet: death. Adam still had to believe what God said about "thou shalt surely die". Adam pleased God by taking Him at His word and not eating the fruit (until he didn't). I'm open to being wrong about this but I've thought about it carefully. I would be thrilled if anyone had some piece of this puzzle that I'm not looking at carefully enough.
28:34 Grace begins in Gen 1 and continues into eternity. No one is ever saved without Grace. 31:43 In Genesis 1 and 2 nobody is gonna be saved by grace through faith. Its a covenant of pure works...
@@JamesBrown-fd1nv by implication, would that mean that the disciples were not offered or did not attain grace since they walked with God in the flesh?
@@Mr.S.C.Wilson Not so, we have sin from birth, Lucifer and company did not. They didn't have anyone tempting them like Adam and Eve, and they were in the presence of God as spirit beings.
When you are listening to ruckman you better have your Bible out and your turning hand warmed up. Scripture to prove scripture is the point. I didn’t have mine out when I started this video but because of the reading by the attendees I will be watching it again with my Bible out. Lol.
We were born into the midst of a battle and never appreciated the type of war it happened to be. Men speak of the Fog of War. That is no better seen then the state of the church today. The vile body existed in Paul's day and is even more so now. The professing church has no absolute authority since the average pastor thinks you need multiply translations and interpretations of scripture rather than believing the God given text of the King James Bible. I was saved by hearing a street preacher from PBI who confronted me on the sidewalk in downtown Pensacola.
And the street preachers are soldiers on the frontline. But where else are you going to find the truth except in the streets now adays. Pray for the street preachers to see the fruits of their labors. Its disheartening getting arrest by police and attacked by the public and have basically only one or two brothers to go out with you to keep you safe.
Matthew 15:21-28 KJV [21] Then Jesus went thence, and departed into the coasts of Tyre and Sidon. [22] And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil. [23] But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us. [24] But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. [25] Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me. [26] But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs. [27] And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table. [28] Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour. The sword of this verse is double bladed. The humble accept crumbs of blessings and nation has the whole bread and cannot see there blessing. It’s a truth of being grateful for whatever blessing cometh the way of the believer. What Jesus said was meant to be an back handed insult to Israel. The woman accepted the direct insult from Christ and was blessed
Still waiting for a definition of “hyper dispensationalism.” I’ve always respected Dr Ruckman, but his greatest failure was his failure to follow dispensational thinking to its conclusion, and insistence on holding to Baptist traditions.
The Bible makes it 100% clear that in the OT, Abraham was justified by faith ALONE in Genesis 15:5-6 when God makes his Covenant with Abraham. (The Abrahamic Covenant) which Paul reaffirms in Romans 4:20-21. Those who teach that Abraham was justified by sacrificing Isaac at the altar (saved by works) 30 years later in Genesis 22 then IGNORE Genesis 15 where the scripture EXPLICITLY states that Abraham BELIEVED God and Abraham's FAITH was counted as righteousness. The Bible teaches that both Abraham and King David were saved by FAITH apart from WORKS but these hyperdispensationalists teach they were saved by FAITH and WORKS in the Old Testament and that is absolutely WRONG and a complete misunderstanding of the Bible.
No one was "saved" in the New Testament sense before Christ. That's why they went to the heart of the earth instead of Heaven. The blood of bulls and goats covered their sins, but only Jesus' blood could remit their sins. There is no new birth in the Old Testament.
Hey organic.. what you gonna do with Ezekiel 18:24? Let’s watch you make something up to fit your doctrine. And wasn’t Abraham not justified when he offered up Isaac ?? How you gonna explain that one? Didn’t David say TAKE NOT THY HOLY SPIRIT FROM ME? Cmon let’s hear you make something up that ain’t bible to fit your doctrine.. I need a good laugh
@@krislee2804 real talk, bro. He left like 87 comments on this video, and from the content it seems as if he didn't even watch the video. Ruckman taught in this video that Abraham's was a covenant of grace through faith. This man seems to think that Ruckman believes that Abraham was justified by works, which proves that he did not even watch the entirety of the video. Peter Ruckman just lives rent free in this man's head.
John 7:38-39 makes it very obvious that no one could be born again till after the cross. The first ones born again are in john chapter 20. Jesus was born again in john chapter 20 when he came back after the dead the proof of this is acts 13:33 When you believe in 1 corinthians 15 :1-4 your born again and in christ. Ephesians 5 bones of his bones flesh of his flesh. John 3 you can't go back into your mother's whomb. First your in adam then after the gospel you come from the womb of Jesus the new man the last adam just like eve came out of Adams ribs the church comes out of the shedding of blood and the out pour of the Holy Ghost and ressurection. You believe in some weird doctrine man. Your either a calvinist or a pentecostal, your a gnostic none the less
Did Ruckman ever read Romans 4, where we the church the body of Christ, who are believers today (from Acts 9 - Hebrews) are "saved by grace through faith" Eph 2:8-10. This study shows Ruckman did not understand the difference between grace and works: Adam onwards (to Paul Acts 9) was saved by: "faith by works" James 2:20-26. Then after the event known as the "rapture" of the church the body of Christ, soul salvation shall be resumed by faith by works Hebrews to Revelation.
Peter (between Hebrews - Revelation) said believers were kept by the power of God through FAITH (NOT WORKS) unto salvation and that they had an eternal inheritance reserved in heaven. 1 Peter 1:4-5 (KJV) To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you, Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.
@@timchess2313 YOU, have inserted into God's word: "(NOT WORKS) " why? it is not there is it? Peter taught works didn't he? If you are in doubt, re-read his epistles!
Even though Ruckman was a very good Bible teacher and loved the KJV, this is one of his teachings I agree to disagree with. Salvation is always by grace through faith. This is true throughout all dispensations or else man would have reason to boast. (Eph 2:8-9, Rom 4:3). The moment an unregenerate individual believes the gospel of grace (1 Cor 15:3-4) that person passes from spiritual death to spiritual life.
The old testament saints were saved by faith alone looking forward to the coming messiah (the promised seed) just like we are saved by faith alone in Jesus's looking back. No man is justified by the works of the law.
@jb-bv2dr the title would be enough, "dispensational salvation". There's only one way to be saved and that's by faith in christ. From Adam and Eve through the tribulation. It's always the same.
Ezekiel 18:24 But when the righteous turneth away from his righteousness, and committeth iniquity, and doeth according to all the abominations that the wicked man doeth, shall he live? All his righteousness that he hath done shall not be mentioned: in his trespass that he hath trespassed, and in his sin that he hath sinned, in them shall he die.
Seven church ages (dispensations) Seven Angels or MESSENGERS Seven attributes of Jesus Seven Seals Seven THUNDERS! 10 For who hath despised the day of small things? For they shall rejoice, and shall see the plummet in the hand of Zerubbabel with those seven; They are the eyes of the Lord, which run to and fro through the whole earth. Zech. 4 KJV. The mystery of the seven stars which thou sawest in my right hand, and the seven golden candlesticks. The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches: and the seven candlesticks which thou sawest are the seven churches. 12 Wherefore I will not be negligent to put you always in remembrance of these things, though ye know them, and be established in the PRESENT TRUTH. 2 Peter 1 KJV.
Well, he said something wrong. He said, study so God will approve of you. It should be "study to show thyself that you are approved of God already" - there's no process of approval in that verse. We are already approved of God thru Christ and His finished work at the cross. We don't study to be saved or to be justified or even to be approved. Hopefully someone will answer me here.
The point is not to study to be saved from hell, but already being saved to study to shew yourself approved unto God, a workman. Salvation is not of works, but studying God's word takes work and labour inorder to be approved by God and avoid heresies. 1 Corinthians 11:19 (KJV) For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you. 1 Timothy 5:17 (KJV) Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour, especially they who labour in the word and doctrine. Salvation is a free gift without works, but rightly dividing the word of truth does require study, work (WORKman), and labour in the word and doctine.
@@timchess2313 there’s no ‘To be approved’ in the verse - you put that in and thats eisegesis. Study to show thyself , not to God, that you are approved already. You are complete in Christ so approved already - there’s nothing to prove to God for Christ is enough unless you dont think so. I cor 11:19 pertains to your judgement thru doctrine who are approved and not
@@timchess2313 rightly dividing is as simple as determining what verse pertains to law and what pertains to grace. In Rom 6:14 we are not under law but under grace however we look at scripture as if all are laws and that needs right dividing.
I have a question for any Ruckman follower who cares to answer. How was Lot saved? In 2 Peter chapter 2 Lot is described as just, righteous and godly. There is no record of him performing any good works. The last we hear of Lot is that he's passed out drunk, fornicating with his daughters. How was Lot saved?
I used to wonder too, I didn't realize that until Moses brought down the 10 commands to the Jews they weren't under the laws yet, Abraham, Issac and Jacob etc didn't even have those law's. Ruckman explains this in another class he taught sorry I don't remember which one, does this help you. I hope so, God bless you, sir
@@LadyDi820 Sorry for the delay. The reason I asked the question concerning Lot's salvation to the Ruckman followers is to show them that they cannot answer it. They, following Ruckman, teach that men before the Law, under the Law, and during the tribulation are saved by their own works. This is heresy. The apostle Paul, before giving any instructions to the church, devotes the first 5 chapters of Romans to showing clearly that no man, before the cross or after can be saved by his own works. All are "under sin". In Adam all die. Some quotes from Ruckman concerning the way of salvation for those alive during the tribulation: "In the tribulation it's endurance, it's by works." "You better work, work, work, work." "You better keep the 10 commandments and not bust one... and then some...". "You better not make one mistake". "Don't get excited, you're going to hell anyway." Ruckman devoted his life to promoting himself as some sort of bible genius with an understanding of scripture above all others. His followers hold him as such. Truth is that Ruckman was a boastful, cunning, heretical nut. There is a You-tube channel called edwardpf123. I suggest you go to it. In the playlists section, you will find several videos where Ed exposes Ruckman as the liar and heretic that he was and Ed explains dispensationalism clearly and biblically. Ruckman and his followers will only lead you into confusion and error, Diane. Be careful. God bless you. Amen.
@@LadyDi820 This doesn't really make sense to me. If those after the law needed the law because they needed their sins covered in order to go to Abraham's bosom to wait for Jesus, why didn't Lot need his sins covered?
Lot was justified through his obedience. The LORD told him to leave Sodom and Gomorrha. Imagine if he had now "faith only" - "Yes Lord I believe that you're going to blow this place up, but I'll stay here ignoring your commandment that you gave me." His faith would've been in vain (James 2). Imagine Noah saying "yes Lord I have faith in your words that you'll bring the flood, but I prefer not to obey your commandment to build this ark." Imagine Abraham saying, "yes Lord I believe in your promises but I'll stay here in my own Land." In this context faith without works is dead, since you didn't justify your faith through your obedience.
Dispensational teaching that you can't fall away from the faith. That why it's ok to remarry after divorce. Even though Jesus and Paul said you can't rermarry as long as the first spouse is living. Paul wrote to the Galatians 5:19-21 tells who will not inherit the kingdom of God. Adultery is one of the reason. Paul and Jesus said to be remarry as long as your first spouse is living you are living in ADULTERY!!!! "THINK ABOUT IT"
Matthew 19:9 (KJV) And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery. Jesus allowed for fornication as a legitimate reason to end a marriage. 1 Corinthians 7:15 (KJV) But if the unbelieving depart, let him depart. A brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases: but God hath called us to peace. Paul said if an unbeliever leaves a believer that it is permitted to let them go and that a believer is not under bondage to fight and try to force the unbeliever to stay married because God has called us to peace. Also for the record in the case of fornication Dr Ruckman recommended trying to forgive and forget and try to keep the marriage if possible especially when children are involved.
@@kauaifishing1365 Agree!!! But Grace doesn't give anyone to live in sin. Paul made that clear in Romans 6:1-2 What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God forbid.
Wow what a false teaching here. Dispensationals is not a biblical doctrine and it teaches the hearsay of different ways of salvation through the ages, when it’s clear in the bible its ALWAYS been by FAITH alone
There is NOT one way to be saved in the Old Testament and a different way to be saved in the New Testament. That would be TWO different gospels. There wasn’t one way for the Jew to be saved, and now a different way for the gentile to be saved. That would be TWO roads to Heaven. There’s only ONE road to Heaven. Jesus said: “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no man comes to the Father but by Me” (John 14:6). In the Old Testament, they were saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone, looking ahead to the coming of Christ. Jesus said in John 8:56, Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day and he saw it and was glad. Jesus was speaking PAST tense there. Abraham was looking ahead to the coming of Christ while BELIEVING in Him. Today we are saved by looking BACK to the FIRST coming of Christ, who He died on the Cross bearing our sins. In the Old Testament, they simply looked ahead to the coming of Christ. But we ALL meet at the foot of the Cross. It is by GRACE alone, through FAITH alone, in Christ ALONE that anyone is saved. I have an Old Testament verse for anyone who will read. Genesis 15:6 And he BELIEVED in the Lord; and he counted it to him for righteousness. No mention at ALL of WORKS plus FAITH. ONLY BELIEVE. Romans 4:3 So Abraham BELIEVED God, and it was counted to him as righteousness. When Paul makes his case for justification by FAITH in the book of Romans, he doesn’t cite the example of how Matthew was converted, or how Mark was converted, or Luke, or John. Paul goes back to the Old Testament. In Romans chapter 4, Paul uses the examples of Abraham and David to teach in the New Testament there how someone was justified by FAITH in the Old Testament. It's undeniable. And in Romans 1:17, Paul says, For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from FAITH to FAITH: as it is written, The just shall live by faith. This was quoting Habakkuk 2:4 from the Old Testament which says, Behold his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his FAITH. Paul makes his case in the New Testament in Romans by quoting the Old Testament, referring to the very same Gospel of Salvation. Romans 4:2 For if Abraham were justified by WORKS, he hath whereof to glory; but NOT before God. Meaning if Abraham was justified by WORKS, he has something to boast about, but NOT before God. Paul had spent much of this letter to the Romans making the point that nobody can be justified-shown to be righteous-before God by following the WORKS of the law. Look at Romans 1:1-2 1)Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the Gospel of God. 2) Which he had promised afore by his prophets in the holy scriptures. That word "afore" means BEFORE. And the holy scriptures in this verse is referring to the Old Testament. So these TWO verses can be translated perfectly like this. Paul, a servant of Christ Jesus, set apart for the Gospel of God, which was recorded in Old Testament Scripture by the prophets long ago. So the book of Romans says that the Gospel was recorded in the Old Testament, and they believed it and were saved. Just like anyone who BELIEVES it now is saved. Neither is there Salvation in ANY other: for there is none other name under Heaven given among men whereby we must be saved. (Acts 4:12). Salvation is not given and was never given in ANY OTHER way other than BELIEVING in Jesus Christ without WORKS. Then 1 Timothy 2:5-6 5) For there is ONE God, and ONE mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; 6) Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time. In verse 6, testified means testimony and due time means at the proper time. So how many gods are there? “One God and one mediator between God and men.” How many mediators? One mediator. The man Christ Jesus. There are as many mediators as there are gods. ONE. So the Gospel was NOT mediated ANY other way other than the man Christ Jesus. We must be crystal clear about this. There’s ONLY ONE God, and there’s ONLY ONE mediator to this God, and that is the man, Christ Jesus. That is an immutable TRUTH that is as equally true in the Old Testament as it is in the New Testament. Immutable meaning unchanging over time or unable to be changed. There’s the old saying, “If it’s NEW, it’s NOT true.” So, if you ever hear some NEW way of salvation, you can just mark it OFF as heretic which is the reason you point to why some Christians call you a heretic. The Bible itself teaches there is ONLY ONE way of Salvation. Salvation has ALWAYS been and will ALWAYS be by GRACE through FAITH ALONE. Unfortunately proponents of dispensational salvation have led many to believe that in the old testament, man was saved through a combination of both FAITH and WORKS. If Salvation was in fact ALSO by WORKS in the Old Testament, then undoubtedly those who lived under the law would have a basis to boast before God. Ephesians 2:8-9 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should boast. Romans 3:27-28 27) Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? Of works? Nay: but by the law of faith. 28) Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law. How is the man justified? By FAITH without the Deeds of the LAW. It's important to realize that GRACE and WORKS are mutually exclusive. Meaning if Salvation was by WORKS then it could NOT have been by GRACE. And if Salvation was by GRACE then it could NOT have been by WORKS. It is either by GRACE or by WORKS but it cannot be BOTH. Romans 11:6 And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then it is no more grace: otherwise work is no more work. So it cannot be BOTH. Many mistakenly identify the LAW as a means of justification rather than a mirror which reflects man's sinful condition and inability to save himself. Those who would propose that man at any time in any dispensation be justified by keeping the LAW and doing WORKS do NOT understand the LAW'S demand of perfection and it's purpose specific to Salvation. In other words, if the law must be kept at ALL, then ALL of the LAW must be kept. But James 2:10 says, For whosoever shall keep the whole law and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. Galatians 3:10 For as many as are of the WORKS of the LAW are under the CURSE: for it is written, cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the LAW to do them. Does it say cursed is everyone that continuous in SOME things? NO It says, continuous in ALL things which are written in the book of the law to do them. Although I agree with dispensations to the point that there are different time periods such as right now we are living in the church age also known as the age of Grace. And there was at one point the Age of Innocence and there will be the millennial age that is coming. These are dispensations and although I do agree with different periods of time, the Bible does NOT teach different ways of salvations in different time periods. It is Biblical that there is ONLY one Salvation for ALL time periods. I have given MANY scripture verses here both in the Old Testament proving Peter Ruckman WRONG. These all put holes in your teaching but it's up to you to relearn your thinking or stay in error.
Read James 2: 22Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect? 23And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God. 24Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.(James 2) There is a reason why both Paul and James takes Abraham as an example to proof their own point. Because there are two types of saved people: 9Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision only, or upon the uncircumcision also? for we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness. 10How was it then reckoned? when he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision. 11And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised: that he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also: 12And the father of circumcision to them who are not of the circumcision only, but who also walk in the steps of that faith of our father Abraham, which he had being yet uncircumcised.(Romans 4) 1.Those who keep the law and also have faith in the Lord: And the father of circumcision to them who are not of the circumcision only, but who also walk in the steps of that faith of our father Abraham, which he had being yet uncircumcised. 2. Those who do not keep the law but have faith in the Lord: that he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also Paul is using Abraham's example to demonstrate how group 2 is saved. James is using Abraham's example to demonstrate how group 1 is saved: 1James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting. (James 1) Twelve tribes. He was writing to the Jews. The blood atonement of the Lord Jesus Christ is in effect when He died on the cross and raised from the dead, the church started there. But the gospel of Jesus Christ was not preached until Paul had the revelation from the Lord Jesus Christ. Read Galatians 1 and 2, and compare them with Acts 15. You will see how the early church in Jerusalem agreed that the gospel that Paul preached is correct that the church is not saved by keeping the law, but by believing in the Lord Jesus Christ. Also compare the preaching by Peter in Acts 2, he never mention the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ and that He died for our sins once. And also see in the Acts 10, Peter still think that he needs to keep the law (He refuse to eat the fourfooted beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and fowls of the air in the vision). Not only that, in the tribulation period, people are not saved by faith in the Lord Jesus Christ alone: Revelation 14:12 King James Bible Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus. They must believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and KEEP THE COMMANDMENTS OF GOD to be saved.
Dude theres like 7 gospels . Just on the top of my head here is a few. The one Jesus preached was faith and works. Jesus said if your hand causes you to sin cut it off. What peter preaches in acts 2:38 is faith and works different then in acts 10 which is faith alone. A dispensation of the gospel was given to paul 1 corinthians 15:1-4 Hebrews 4:2 the gospel given to moses Galatians 3 the gospel given to abraham. Revelations 14:6 another gospel Luke chpt 1 Look up 7 gospels by Robert Breaker for the other ones.
Not sure about that, I am sure he presenting what hypers taught in his day, or atleast the one's he disagreed with. He believed in water baptism, he believed the gospel of salvation by grace through faith in the finished work of Christ was taught in Peter's epistles. He believed a Christian should confess their sins according to 1 John 1:9. Among other thing s that many Hyperdispensationalists don't believe.
@@timchess2313 to bad he didn't understand or believe this Galatians 2:7-9 KJVS But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; [8] (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:) [9] And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.
@@timchess2313 I more hyper than this but it's a start for those who don't know the difference between Paul the twelve and a 4 gospel Jesus vs a resurrected Jesus ministry. th-cam.com/video/aPYRQZikQIE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=X5vxvwP2ptLEHDt_
KJV Acts 28 has Paul and other believers healing foke. It the book of Romans where the Dispensation of Grace begins. Paul is now unable to heal 2Tim 4:20.
I gotta tell you. I've seen some unbelievably FEEBLE theological minds in my time. But this guy truly takes the dispensational taco! Yikes and triple yikes!
There is NOT one way to be saved in the Old Testament and a different way to be saved in the New Testament. That would be TWO different gospels. There wasn’t one way for the Jew to be saved, and now a different way for the gentile to be saved. That would be TWO roads to Heaven. There’s only ONE road to Heaven. Jesus said: “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no man comes to the Father but by Me” (John 14:6). In the Old Testament, they were saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone, looking ahead to the coming of Christ. Jesus said in John 8:56, Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day and he saw it and was glad. Jesus was speaking PAST tense there. Abraham was looking ahead to the coming of Christ while BELIEVING in Him. Today we are saved by looking BACK to the FIRST coming of Christ, who He died on the Cross bearing our sins. In the Old Testament, they simply looked ahead to the coming of Christ. But we ALL meet at the foot of the Cross. It is by GRACE alone, through FAITH alone, in Christ ALONE that anyone is saved. I have an Old Testament verse for anyone who will read. Genesis 15:6 And he BELIEVED in the Lord; and he counted it to him for righteousness. No mention at ALL of WORKS plus FAITH. ONLY BELIEVE. Romans 4:3 So Abraham BELIEVED God, and it was counted to him as righteousness. When Paul makes his case for justification by FAITH in the book of Romans, he doesn’t cite the example of how Matthew was converted, or how Mark was converted, or Luke, or John. Paul goes back to the Old Testament. In Romans chapter 4, Paul uses the examples of Abraham and David to teach in the New Testament there how someone was justified by FAITH in the Old Testament. It's undeniable. And in Romans 1:17, Paul says, For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from FAITH to FAITH: as it is written, The just shall live by faith. This was quoting Habakkuk 2:4 from the Old Testament which says, Behold his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his FAITH. Paul makes his case in the New Testament in Romans by quoting the Old Testament, referring to the very same Gospel of Salvation. Romans 4:2 For if Abraham were justified by WORKS, he hath whereof to glory; but NOT before God. Meaning if Abraham was justified by WORKS, he has something to boast about, but NOT before God. Paul had spent much of this letter to the Romans making the point that nobody can be justified-shown to be righteous-before God by following the WORKS of the law. Look at Romans 1:1-2 1)Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the Gospel of God. 2) Which he had promised afore by his prophets in the holy scriptures. That word "afore" means BEFORE. And the holy scriptures in this verse is referring to the Old Testament. So these TWO verses can be translated perfectly like this. Paul, a servant of Christ Jesus, set apart for the Gospel of God, which was recorded in Old Testament Scripture by the prophets long ago. So the book of Romans says that the Gospel was recorded in the Old Testament, and they believed it and were saved. Just like anyone who BELIEVES it now is saved. Neither is there Salvation in ANY other: for there is none other name under Heaven given among men whereby we must be saved. (Acts 4:12). Salvation is not given and was never given in ANY OTHER way other than BELIEVING in Jesus Christ without WORKS. Then 1 Timothy 2:5-6 5) For there is ONE God, and ONE mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; 6) Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time. In verse 6, testified means testimony and due time means at the proper time. So how many gods are there? “One God and one mediator between God and men.” How many mediators? One mediator. The man Christ Jesus. There are as many mediators as there are gods. ONE. So the Gospel was NOT mediated ANY other way other than the man Christ Jesus. We must be crystal clear about this. There’s ONLY ONE God, and there’s ONLY ONE mediator to this God, and that is the man, Christ Jesus. That is an immutable TRUTH that is as equally true in the Old Testament as it is in the New Testament. Immutable meaning unchanging over time or unable to be changed. There’s the old saying, “If it’s NEW, it’s NOT true.” So, if you ever hear some NEW way of salvation, you can just mark it OFF as heretic which is the reason you point to why some Christians call you a heretic. The Bible itself teaches there is ONLY ONE way of Salvation. Salvation has ALWAYS been and will ALWAYS be by GRACE through FAITH ALONE. Unfortunately proponents of dispensational salvation have led many to believe that in the old testament, man was saved through a combination of both FAITH and WORKS. If Salvation was in fact ALSO by WORKS in the Old Testament, then undoubtedly those who lived under the law would have a basis to boast before God. Ephesians 2:8-9 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should boast. Romans 3:27-28 27) Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? Of works? Nay: but by the law of faith. 28) Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law. How is the man justified? By FAITH without the Deeds of the LAW. It's important to realize that GRACE and WORKS are mutually exclusive. Meaning if Salvation was by WORKS then it could NOT have been by GRACE. And if Salvation was by GRACE then it could NOT have been by WORKS. It is either by GRACE or by WORKS but it cannot be BOTH. Romans 11:6 And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then it is no more grace: otherwise work is no more work. So it cannot be BOTH. Many mistakenly identify the LAW as a means of justification rather than a mirror which reflects man's sinful condition and inability to save himself. Those who would propose that man at any time in any dispensation be justified by keeping the LAW and doing WORKS do NOT understand the LAW'S demand of perfection and it's purpose specific to Salvation. In other words, if the law must be kept at ALL, then ALL of the LAW must be kept. But James 2:10 says, For whosoever shall keep the whole law and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. Galatians 3:10 For as many as are of the WORKS of the LAW are under the CURSE: for it is written, cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the LAW to do them. Does it say cursed is everyone that continuous in SOME things? NO It says, continuous in ALL things which are written in the book of the law to do them. Although I agree with dispensations to the point that there are different time periods such as right now we are living in the church age also known as the age of Grace. And there was at one point the Age of Innocence and there will be the millennial age that is coming. These are dispensations and although I do agree with different periods of time, the Bible does NOT teach different ways of salvations in different time periods. It is Biblical that there is ONLY one Salvation for ALL time periods. I have given MANY scripture verses here both in the Old Testament proving Peter Ruckman WRONG. These all put holes in your teaching but it's up to you to relearn your thinking or stay in error.
The Bible makes it 100% clear that in the OT, Abraham was justified by faith ALONE in Genesis 15:5-6 when God makes his Covenant with Abraham. (The Abrahamic Covenant) which Paul reaffirms in Romans 4:20-21. Those who teach that Abraham was justified by sacrificing Isaac at the altar (saved by works) 30 years later in Genesis 22 then IGNORE Genesis 15 where the scripture EXPLICITLY states that Abraham BELIEVED God and Abraham's FAITH was counted as righteousness. The Bible teaches that both Abraham and King David were saved by FAITH apart from WORKS but these hyperdispensationalists teach they were saved by FAITH and WORKS in the Old Testament and that is absolutely WRONG and a complete misunderstanding of the Bible.
@@organiclife4042 It’s sad to see somebody like you in such gross error. No one needs to be saved. It’s all tactics to control individuals. Unfortunately it’s people like you have been caught up in religion and drug down to the depth of darkness. I wish you luck in your endeavors and maybe one day, you will be set free from such nonsense.
I think that's exactly what The Lord is telling YOU Greg Searle to do. Your one line retort isn't going to sway the rest of us who watched the entire thing and actually did search each scripture he mentioned.
I searched the scriptures to see if it was so and guess what? It is so. Dispensational Salvation and the doctrine as a whole is the most honest, consistent and unifying method of Bible teaching and interpretation there is. You can try to show me something else but I really doubt you can. No offense.
Yes,he taught the King James Version,the Devil said,thought same thing,it's easy to think that way,are you teaching the KJV to your children,I don't think so, without looking at the Word of God,how many KJV Bible verses you Memorize,that's what I thought,Repent of Your Sins,you pass this Attitude to others,like your Grand children s
The Bible makes it 100% clear that in the OT, Abraham was justified by faith ALONE in Genesis 15:5-6 when God makes his Covenant with Abraham. (The Abrahamic Covenant) which Paul reaffirms in Romans 4:20-21. Those who teach that Abraham was justified by sacrificing Isaac at the altar (saved by works) 30 years later in Genesis 22 then IGNORE Genesis 15 where the scripture EXPLICITLY states that Abraham BELIEVED God and Abraham's FAITH was counted as righteousness. The Bible teaches that both Abraham and King David were saved by FAITH apart from WORKS but these hyperdispensationalists teach they were saved by FAITH and WORKS in the Old Testament and that is absolutely WRONG and a complete misunderstanding of the Bible.
There is NOT one way to be saved in the Old Testament and a different way to be saved in the New Testament. That would be TWO different gospels. There wasn’t one way for the Jew to be saved, and now a different way for the gentile to be saved. That would be TWO roads to Heaven. There’s only ONE road to Heaven. Jesus said: “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no man comes to the Father but by Me” (John 14:6). In the Old Testament, they were saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone, looking ahead to the coming of Christ. Jesus said in John 8:56, Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day and he saw it and was glad. Jesus was speaking PAST tense there. Abraham was looking ahead to the coming of Christ while BELIEVING in Him. Today we are saved by looking BACK to the FIRST coming of Christ, who He died on the Cross bearing our sins. In the Old Testament, they simply looked ahead to the coming of Christ. But we ALL meet at the foot of the Cross. It is by GRACE alone, through FAITH alone, in Christ ALONE that anyone is saved. I have an Old Testament verse for anyone who will read. Genesis 15:6 And he BELIEVED in the Lord; and he counted it to him for righteousness. No mention at ALL of WORKS plus FAITH. ONLY BELIEVE. Romans 4:3 So Abraham BELIEVED God, and it was counted to him as righteousness. When Paul makes his case for justification by FAITH in the book of Romans, he doesn’t cite the example of how Matthew was converted, or how Mark was converted, or Luke, or John. Paul goes back to the Old Testament. In Romans chapter 4, Paul uses the examples of Abraham and David to teach in the New Testament there how someone was justified by FAITH in the Old Testament. It's undeniable. And in Romans 1:17, Paul says, For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from FAITH to FAITH: as it is written, The just shall live by faith. This was quoting Habakkuk 2:4 from the Old Testament which says, Behold his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his FAITH. Paul makes his case in the New Testament in Romans by quoting the Old Testament, referring to the very same Gospel of Salvation. Romans 4:2 For if Abraham were justified by WORKS, he hath whereof to glory; but NOT before God. Meaning if Abraham was justified by WORKS, he has something to boast about, but NOT before God. Paul had spent much of this letter to the Romans making the point that nobody can be justified-shown to be righteous-before God by following the WORKS of the law. Look at Romans 1:1-2 1)Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the Gospel of God. 2) Which he had promised afore by his prophets in the holy scriptures. That word "afore" means BEFORE. And the holy scriptures in this verse is referring to the Old Testament. So these TWO verses can be translated perfectly like this. Paul, a servant of Christ Jesus, set apart for the Gospel of God, which was recorded in Old Testament Scripture by the prophets long ago. So the book of Romans says that the Gospel was recorded in the Old Testament, and they believed it and were saved. Just like anyone who BELIEVES it now is saved. Neither is there Salvation in ANY other: for there is none other name under Heaven given among men whereby we must be saved. (Acts 4:12). Salvation is not given and was never given in ANY OTHER way other than BELIEVING in Jesus Christ without WORKS. Then 1 Timothy 2:5-6 5) For there is ONE God, and ONE mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; 6) Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time. In verse 6, testified means testimony and due time means at the proper time. So how many gods are there? “One God and one mediator between God and men.” How many mediators? One mediator. The man Christ Jesus. There are as many mediators as there are gods. ONE. So the Gospel was NOT mediated ANY other way other than the man Christ Jesus. We must be crystal clear about this. There’s ONLY ONE God, and there’s ONLY ONE mediator to this God, and that is the man, Christ Jesus. That is an immutable TRUTH that is as equally true in the Old Testament as it is in the New Testament. Immutable meaning unchanging over time or unable to be changed. There’s the old saying, “If it’s NEW, it’s NOT true.” So, if you ever hear some NEW way of salvation, you can just mark it OFF as heretic which is the reason you point to why some Christians call you a heretic. The Bible itself teaches there is ONLY ONE way of Salvation. Salvation has ALWAYS been and will ALWAYS be by GRACE through FAITH ALONE. Unfortunately proponents of dispensational salvation have led many to believe that in the old testament, man was saved through a combination of both FAITH and WORKS. If Salvation was in fact ALSO by WORKS in the Old Testament, then undoubtedly those who lived under the law would have a basis to boast before God. Ephesians 2:8-9 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should boast. Romans 3:27-28 27) Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? Of works? Nay: but by the law of faith. 28) Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law. How is the man justified? By FAITH without the Deeds of the LAW. It's important to realize that GRACE and WORKS are mutually exclusive. Meaning if Salvation was by WORKS then it could NOT have been by GRACE. And if Salvation was by GRACE then it could NOT have been by WORKS. It is either by GRACE or by WORKS but it cannot be BOTH. Romans 11:6 And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then it is no more grace: otherwise work is no more work. So it cannot be BOTH. Many mistakenly identify the LAW as a means of justification rather than a mirror which reflects man's sinful condition and inability to save himself. Those who would propose that man at any time in any dispensation be justified by keeping the LAW and doing WORKS do NOT understand the LAW'S demand of perfection and it's purpose specific to Salvation. In other words, if the law must be kept at ALL, then ALL of the LAW must be kept. But James 2:10 says, For whosoever shall keep the whole law and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. Galatians 3:10 For as many as are of the WORKS of the LAW are under the CURSE: for it is written, cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the LAW to do them. Does it say cursed is everyone that continuous in SOME things? NO It says, continuous in ALL things which are written in the book of the law to do them. Although I agree with dispensations to the point that there are different time periods such as right now we are living in the church age also known as the age of Grace. And there was at one point the Age of Innocence and there will be the millennial age that is coming. These are dispensations and although I do agree with different periods of time, the Bible does NOT teach different ways of salvations in different time periods. It is Biblical that there is ONLY one Salvation for ALL time periods. I have given MANY scripture verses here both in the Old Testament proving Peter Ruckman WRONG. These all put holes in your teaching but it's up to you to relearn your thinking or stay in error.
I was a Christian for 21 years pastor at church for three years before I even heard about Dr. Ruckman, after buying his reference Bible in the 7 foot shelf and studying through it. I asked the Lord to forgive me for my stupidity and give me a fresh start, he did and I started all over again learning the Bible for the first time. I’m so very thankful for his teaching. Very thankful the Lord chose him and so very thankful of the Lord allowed me to come across this man.
Amen 🙏
Well done 👍
Amen,amen,amen. Great testimony.
Very good decision pastor well done
this gentleman has taught me so much
Amen!
Amen...Me too brother!
Amen!!
Amen & Amen Brothers 🙏
So now, do you follow Paul KJV 1Cor 11:1. Do you know how to divide the word of truth, 2Tim 2:15.
More Christians need this teaching.
ALL Christians need this teaching.
Amen and amen!
I am a bible believer but I don't believe there are 7 gospels in the bible. The gospel is everlasting!
@@toddviv There are 2 Gospels according to the Apostles. Should I expand and show scripture?
@@JoshuaMSOG7 you see this is the problem Christians disagree on so much and there are so many churches. it's so discouraging!
What a blessing! I'm going to need to listen to this a few more times. Thanks for posting this one. I have not seen it anywhere.
I feel I need to listen to this about 5 more times, haha.
This is rich!
I'm a bigger dummy than all of you ill need this 50 more times..
i ve never had this
deep and clear teaching.
thank you.
Glory to God, brother!
What in the world are you smoking this crap isn't clear at all and leaves opens tons of errors.
I recently got a good friend of mine out of this nonsense by making three videos for him. Debunking ruckman watch them. I dare you. My buddy saw the light and he left dispensationalism
th-cam.com/video/oV23eHje6Og/w-d-xo.htmlsi=99AeEfXtJeZwTWDW
Watch all 3 I dare you
Boy, it sure would be a blessing to have Ruckman around today!
Amen, but he finished his course, so now hopefully some of us that are still in the flesh can help to pass on his faith and our faith in the Kjv and also his sound doctrinal teaching. Sam Gipp has been preaching kjv for many years but he is getting up there in years. It is good to see that the PSR videos that post up to you tube do get many views. But most of the people, but not all are older males. Hopefully people will avail themselves of his wealth of knowledge of the book and search the scriptures for themselves and pass something on to the next generation. Yeah he may not be here in the flesh but he has left a wealth of material in books, and audio and video. God bless brother! Stay encouraged in the Lord.
@@timchess2313 Amen to that; brother ruckman indeed finished his course. That was me just being selfish for a moment wondering what his take on all that’s happened in our world since he’s been home in heaven would be… But thank you for the encouragement, I’m in my early 30s & do my best to search the scriptures as often as possible, especially with all the trials we as Christians have against us multiply. I tune into Brother Peacock, Gipp, Gene Kim, and a few other Bible believers. There’s just such a shortage for sound doctrinal teaching now. “A famine of the word” for sure.
We need more preachers like Pete in our time 2023...God help us
We sure Do!!!
I think the next great preaching will be done by the two witnesses. It really is starting to look like most of the "beginning of sorrows" are happening right now. I think that almost every country is at war regardless of technically declaring it.
I want to his school but yet listening to this I learn more than I did at school because in the school I was a very young Christian and I was working night shift and I was very tired during the classes since then still keeping close to Dr Ruckman going to his church from time to time and then trying to go out there in minister in this world he by far is the most influential Christian in my life second place is Lester Roloff Lester Roloff and Dr Ruckman are a good couple to have in your Arsenal for people to look up to to have a closeness to our Lord
Amen brother
I used to go to brother Roloffs church , but this was when Brother Roloff had already gone to heaven in 1982 and Pastor Wiley Cameron was my pastor and friend at Peoples Baptist Church and took over after Brother Roloffs graduation to heaven. Did you know that Doc and brother Roloff were very close friends and did alot of conferences together across America??? What a conference that was when these 2 giants in the faith got together and preached.
@@BillShekawow your so blessed
I love Dr Peter's teachings. Thank you for sharing.
My pleasure! Glory to God!
Thank you! Bless you all that keep “sharing” and posting
Dr. Ruckman videos! 2025 and the man is still winning souls Amen Amen Amen
That is my Bible teacher. Great man of God
Is this the storm in Norman who does the Bible reviews in his garage if it is are you still doing the reviews?
I love this man I can’t get enough. I learn something new every time
Amen
Jesus bless Dr. Ruckman...I thank God for giving us such a brilliant man that we might understand his word that much better.
Amen
Great Study thank you so much for posting this I spent the day studying it. I NEED MORE 🥩🥓🍔🥛🍦🍭
Dr. Ruckman tried to feed God’s sheep, praise God these older recordings are still available to help us get spiritual food from the teaching and preaching of God’s word. Amen. Praise God There is much material on TH-cam by Dr Ruckman ( visit Don Nesbitt TH-cam channel and some others) and also visit Bible Baptist Bookstore online to purchase materials in case you didn’t know.
And remember, when they attack you it's because you have the right truth, not the twisted versions from sissy preachers in ivory towers
Great teaching.
Thank you brother Tim. Praying for you friend.
Good to hear from you, thanks for the prayers. Hope you are doing well. God bless. Are you interested to post any Ruckman videos to your channel. I have a few more but not sure if the Lord wants me to post any more, not sure. It is a long story but maybe my motives for youtube channel not right or something. Or if you can tell how to contact D.N. maybe he could do it. I tried messaging him through utube but did not hear back. Yeah I like youtube and putting out videos and responding to heresy in the comments and friends through Comments like yourself but had an accident just before July 4 that got my attention and was thinking the Lord may have been telling me to stop with youtube or Ruckman on youtube or whatever. I posted this last video because I know the man who gave me this material is blessed to see it going out for many to see, saved and lost, and also as bait to see if someone would comment who I felt confident entrusting these videos and audios to post.
Greetings brother I'm listening to this for like the third time 😂
@@proverbs9103 yes I’m here again 🤠
This is a treasure video, seen nothing like this of Docs! And he is so trim. Thanks for digging this out of your vault tim.
EXCELLENT teaching!
Oh yes this video is posted on our KJV 1611 AV group on Mewe now. Thank you brother Tim for posting this nugget for us all.
Thank you brother! Great teaching!
Glory to God!
The dispensary of the Grace OF GOD …. GOD dispensing HIS Grace! Wow
Amen, they have the Marijuana dispensary, we have the grace of God dispensary!
Right there in the word - PRAISE GOD!
Thank you brother Don!
It’s Tim lol
@@edcarson3113 sorry 😳
Lol we all used to ol Nesbitt posting em up. Love to you brothers in Christ. God is good. Keep on fighting.
18:58 Proverbs 8:13 “The fear of the LORD is to hate evil:”
If a man hates evil he fears the LORD.
The gospel of our salvation 1Cor. 15:1-4.Just believe with your whole heart Rom.10:8-10.God bless us all amen.
Get 'em, Ruckman!!
Watch those heads spin right off 'em!
That’s my Bible teacher!
The best!
Thanks Bro Tim
Praise the Lord brother, God bless! Fight the good fight of faith.
Thank you Pastor Ruckman for declaring the wisdom of the LORD. Our nation's leadership need the Salvation of CHRIST JESUS. We need to draw nigh to GOD and HE will draw nigh to us; and the devil will flee from us.
I constantly see people claiming that Peter Ruckman and their favorite term for us "Ruckmanites" are hyper-dispensationalists! Funny stuff!
Many are Pastors who have been indoctrinated by men who are too puffed up to ever consider that maybe he was simply more devoted to that book than they were!
My understanding of the Scriptures took off like a Cheetah chasing a Gazelle when I discovered this man's teaching! Got me in my KJV I'll tell ya that!
They called me that. The ones that think salvation has always been saved by grace, Jews were looking forward to the cross. Called one out on the pulpit after him and his group tried challenging me. One of there wives screamed, cursed and threatened me in the church. So happens I don’t go there anymore, a lot needed fixed. Word of advice, don’t rely on anyone that goes or graduated from Norris Bible Baptist Institute
@@TheChurchIsLikenUntoTheMoon Amen! They ignore the Scriptures and it infuriates them when you present the plain reading of the words of God. I am really starting to think that they have a spirit within them that is in conflict with the Holy Spirit. God bless you and yours!
Nothing like a KJV to clear up a college education 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Aaaaaamen brother.
Thank you for sharing this Brother 🙏 Praise God for you and doc!
Amen
the more truth you recieve the more you will be a natural soul winner.
I just received his book of Revelations. Can't wait to get into his study.
Amen amen amen!
There is a pastor that teaches this that was taught by Dr. Ruckman. His name is Dr. Gene Kim. He is on You Tube. Great teacher also!
He was a student of P.S.R.
I'm sorry to say but gene Kim teaches many fake doctrines and should be avoided.
Yes he is also a good and well worth a watch an listen to, not long now brother's an sister's in Christ ' x
Best preacher I know
Thank you!!
I'm from that city and graduated that year. Wished I went to church back then I got to go to this. Lol.
I have not been to a kjv convention. Though I do go to a kjv church now.
Amen
4:40 “the Lord told me: they don’t have anybody to teach em’…” I seriously doubt that “Pete”.
Not audibly, in spirit. Get closer to God if you want to know the feeling.
I prefer teaching that doesn’t skip around finding scriptures that agree with your premise. Why did the Church not teach dispensationalism for about 18 centuries?
@@phillipditto6590 that is a common but untrue statement. Dispensationalism is taught by believers throughout church history. Also, do you believe in an Old Testament and a New Testament? That would be a form of dispensationalism. To be honest I don’t have time and energy to try and give a thorough answer to your statements. God bless. However there a book for sale on Amazon called “Dispensationalism Before Darby” by William C Watson that may give you access to some historical eveidence of pre 1800’s dispensational teachings.
It's pretty funny that you weren't met with anything other than nunt-uh. It's hard for them to actually explain things outside their echo chamber. Nothing like special revelation to scratch the itching ears of spoon fed Christians.
Paul didnt live by faith, he lived by sight, Jesus appeared to him, spoke him. That is why Paul preached the gospel, because he saw Jesus
Gotta love him.
He despises teachers lol.
because he knows they're belly feeding political rats; not caring educators.
a parent trusts their child to the 'system' to be 'educated'
result is democrats, blm and antifa
Funny enough, the first time I heard about dispensationalism I was told by somebody following it that you cannot use John 3:16 because it's not for us and it's not the right message and you can't get saved from it. But they also say there's no grace before Paul. The John 3:16 is talking about Grace.. because "for God so loved the world is grace.
Matthew 15:24 KJVS
But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
@@REAL88E rightly dividing the word means just that. To say Kingdom of heaven to a gentile they are not going to understand what you're saying versus a Jew. It's simply means not adding two or taking away when you are rightly dividing the same Truth for one individual that will understand what you're saying versus the other that will not. Before the resurrection they preach the gospel to both Jew and gentile just the same as Paul did after the resurrection. There is many scripture proving my point. There is only one gospel and there is only been one gospel since creation and that's the gospel and salvation of Jesus christ. Regardless of what time period
@@telefellavisionYour misunderstanding of what dispensationalists believe about grace is apparent. God has always had grace but not to all men for free salvation revealed thru Paul. Noah found grace but he had to build the ark or he would have not been saved. Paul was saved ( enduring to the end) into the earthly kingdom program and move from faith to faith to be sealed by the gospel of the grace of God revealed in 1 cor t5 :1-4 KJV Paul is the only apostle for this age....Galatians 2:7-9 KJVS
But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; [8] (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:) [9] And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.
@@telefellavisionlol actually he beats down mid acts Hyper dispensationalists and teach mostly what they teach in a lot of cases. Lol example he tares down a false claim about acts transitions which no mid acts believe then he states our Pauline position as his. Lol acts transit from law to grace and at the end of acts the earthly Israel kingdom was ended. Actually was not ended but postponed. Lol paper tigers all in this video
@@REAL88E glad it's just a joke to you.
I dint get scared tWo offten but Mr. Peter S. Ruckman is giving never ending word = Christ Jesus whoaaaaa
I just listened to a 30 min video of someone trying to debunk dispensationalism. He completely misrepresented dispy theology, and used strawman arguments, and didn’t know what he was talking about. It was frustrating because he had comments turned off on his video so I couldn’t refute his claims.
[26:00] A DISPENSATION IS NOT A PERIOD OF TIME
Beef steak & BBQ pork is good for me
I like too!
At what point does he start talking about dispensational salvation please?
I got two four-and-a-half minutes in, but he still hadn't started talking about it.
It is a long message, he certainly gets into it
Take your studying seriously or don't bother. What kind of question is that?
@@JamesBrown-fd1nv
What sort of nasty reply is that???
Oops! Now you've gone and got yourself:
MUTED 👈
BLOCKED 👈
SILENCED 👈
From ever speaking to me again.
Pity.
Goodbye.
P.S.
Love is patient, love is kind, love does not demand all its own way . . . shouting and bawling until it gets it's own way.
Goodbye
P.S.
If you choose to listen to a Windbag, that's your choice.
Don't criticise others that don't want to listen to a Wingbag!
@@SCAM-BUSTER.777that wasn’t very nice either…
@@joshmccartney777
Here's something else which isn't very nice.
There are two things that you can be sure of:
When you help CHRISTIANS on TH-cam and solve their problems
THEY DON'T SAY THANK YOU.
When you say something that THEY believe is wrong
They are QUICK to jump in and
CRITICISE !
Time after time
after time
Soooo UNGRATEFUL !
So PATHETIC ! ... ... ...
Good stuff
😉📖
Fanatic!😂
I think Ruckman was an excellent Bible teacher. The Lord, in His marvelous grace, led me to Ruckman's teachings very early on and I am extremely thankful for this. I'm watching this video because I know I still have plenty to learn through Ruckman's teachings, his reference Bible and commentaries are often the first (human) port of call if I am struggling to understand something.
That said, I think that Ruckman was wrong about the Edenic covenant requiring no faith.
Heb 11:7 By faith Noah, being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear, prepared an ark to the saving of his house; by the which he condemned the world, and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith.
Adam was warned of God of things not seen as yet: death. Adam still had to believe what God said about "thou shalt surely die". Adam pleased God by taking Him at His word and not eating the fruit (until he didn't).
I'm open to being wrong about this but I've thought about it carefully. I would be thrilled if anyone had some piece of this puzzle that I'm not looking at carefully enough.
Real fruit not Frisco fruit 👍
At the 37:34 mark he mentions masons. Please tell me he wasnt a Mason
No definitely not! The only organization i ever heard him being member of was the NRA.
28:34 Grace begins in Gen 1 and continues into eternity. No one is ever saved without Grace.
31:43 In Genesis 1 and 2 nobody is gonna be saved by grace through faith. Its a covenant of pure works...
Yes Grace is through out the entire Bible, but Grace as the only means for salvation showed up with Christ.
@@WilldoAldone how much of a man’s righteousness satisfies the perfect and unequivocally righteousness of God for Redemption?
It should be noted that God's grace is not offered or attainable for any pre-Adamic beings because they saw God and were in his presence.
@@JamesBrown-fd1nv by implication, would that mean that the disciples were not offered or did not attain grace since they walked with God in the flesh?
@@Mr.S.C.Wilson Not so, we have sin from birth, Lucifer and company did not. They didn't have anyone tempting them like Adam and Eve, and they were in the presence of God as spirit beings.
I wish he wouldn’t have had people reading because you can’t hear them.
Understand
When you are listening to ruckman you better have your Bible out and your turning hand warmed up. Scripture to prove scripture is the point. I didn’t have mine out when I started this video but because of the reading by the attendees I will be watching it again with my Bible out. Lol.
Нет перевода на русский прошу сделать?
Я мог бы перевести его для вас, но это займет некоторое время. У вас есть Telegram? Там мы с этим справимся.
Romans 3:20. He missed it
We were born into the midst of a battle and never appreciated the type of war it happened to be. Men speak of the Fog of War. That is no better seen then the state of the church today. The vile body existed in Paul's day and is even more so now. The professing church has no absolute authority since the average pastor thinks you need multiply translations and interpretations of scripture rather than believing the God given text of the King James Bible. I was saved by hearing a street preacher from PBI who confronted me on the sidewalk in downtown Pensacola.
Great testimony
And the street preachers are soldiers on the frontline. But where else are you going to find the truth except in the streets now adays. Pray for the street preachers to see the fruits of their labors. Its disheartening getting arrest by police and attacked by the public and have basically only one or two brothers to go out with you to keep you safe.
Matthew 15:21-28 KJV
[21] Then Jesus went thence, and departed into the coasts of Tyre and Sidon. [22] And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil. [23] But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us. [24] But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. [25] Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me. [26] But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs. [27] And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table. [28] Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour.
The sword of this verse is double bladed. The humble accept crumbs of blessings and nation has the whole bread and cannot see there blessing. It’s a truth of being grateful for whatever blessing cometh the way of the believer. What Jesus said was meant to be an back handed insult to Israel. The woman accepted the direct insult from Christ and was blessed
"Its gonna be raw beef steak for about an hour or so" 🎉🎉 hahahahaha
What church was this at?
Galilean in Livonia Michigan pastored then by Herbert Noe
@@timchess2313 oh ok I’m from Detroit area, they aren’t around anymore are they?
@@jonathangreenshields7202 actually I think they are, pastor Noe's son may be the pastor
@@jonathangreenshields7202 We are in Plymouth now. Daniel Noe is our pastor now. Pay us a visit! We'd love to have you.
@@lukebarrett7955 I’ll do so when I’m back in town
Still waiting for a definition of “hyper dispensationalism.” I’ve always respected Dr Ruckman, but his greatest failure was his failure to follow dispensational thinking to its conclusion, and insistence on holding to Baptist traditions.
The Bible makes it 100% clear that in the OT, Abraham was justified by faith ALONE in Genesis 15:5-6 when God makes his Covenant with Abraham.
(The Abrahamic Covenant) which Paul reaffirms in Romans 4:20-21.
Those who teach that Abraham was justified by sacrificing Isaac at the altar (saved by works) 30 years later in Genesis 22 then IGNORE Genesis 15 where the scripture EXPLICITLY states that Abraham BELIEVED God and Abraham's FAITH was counted as righteousness.
The Bible teaches that both Abraham and King David were saved by FAITH apart from WORKS but these hyperdispensationalists teach they were saved by FAITH and WORKS in the Old Testament and that is absolutely WRONG and a complete misunderstanding of the Bible.
No one was "saved" in the New Testament sense before Christ. That's why they went to the heart of the earth instead of Heaven. The blood of bulls and goats covered their sins, but only Jesus' blood could remit their sins. There is no new birth in the Old Testament.
@@jeremybingham3708no point in correcting guys like this.. they aren’t bible believers man.. and they make crap up to fit their false doctrine.
Hey organic.. what you gonna do with Ezekiel 18:24? Let’s watch you make something up to fit your doctrine. And wasn’t Abraham not justified when he offered up Isaac ?? How you gonna explain that one? Didn’t David say TAKE NOT THY HOLY SPIRIT FROM ME? Cmon let’s hear you make something up that ain’t bible to fit your doctrine.. I need a good laugh
@@krislee2804 real talk, bro. He left like 87 comments on this video, and from the content it seems as if he didn't even watch the video. Ruckman taught in this video that Abraham's was a covenant of grace through faith. This man seems to think that Ruckman believes that Abraham was justified by works, which proves that he did not even watch the entirety of the video. Peter Ruckman just lives rent free in this man's head.
John 7:38-39 makes it very obvious that no one could be born again till after the cross. The first ones born again are in john chapter 20.
Jesus was born again in john chapter 20 when he came back after the dead the proof of this is acts 13:33
When you believe in 1 corinthians 15 :1-4 your born again and in christ. Ephesians 5 bones of his bones flesh of his flesh. John 3 you can't go back into your mother's whomb. First your in adam then after the gospel you come from the womb of Jesus the new man the last adam just like eve came out of Adams ribs the church comes out of the shedding of blood and the out pour of the Holy Ghost and ressurection.
You believe in some weird doctrine man. Your either a calvinist or a pentecostal, your a gnostic none the less
0:03 pastor bro Noah
Did Ruckman ever read Romans 4, where we the church the body of Christ, who are believers today (from Acts 9 - Hebrews) are "saved by grace through faith" Eph 2:8-10.
This study shows Ruckman did not understand the difference between grace and works:
Adam onwards (to Paul Acts 9) was saved by: "faith by works" James 2:20-26.
Then after the event known as the "rapture" of the church the body of Christ, soul salvation shall be resumed by faith by works Hebrews to Revelation.
Peter (between Hebrews - Revelation) said believers were kept by the power of God through FAITH (NOT WORKS) unto salvation and that they had an eternal inheritance reserved in heaven.
1 Peter 1:4-5 (KJV) To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you,
Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.
@@timchess2313 YOU, have inserted into God's word: "(NOT WORKS) " why? it is not there is it? Peter taught works didn't he? If you are in doubt, re-read his epistles!
Even though Ruckman was a very good Bible teacher and loved the KJV, this is one of his teachings I agree to disagree with.
Salvation is always by grace through faith. This is true throughout all dispensations or else man would have reason to boast. (Eph 2:8-9, Rom 4:3).
The moment an unregenerate individual believes the gospel of grace (1 Cor 15:3-4) that person passes from spiritual death to spiritual life.
The old testament saints were saved by faith alone looking forward to the coming messiah (the promised seed) just like we are saved by faith alone in Jesus's looking back. No man is justified by the works of the law.
I dont think you listened at all
@jb-bv2dr the title would be enough, "dispensational salvation". There's only one way to be saved and that's by faith in christ. From Adam and Eve through the tribulation. It's always the same.
@@john1172 John 3:4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?
So why didn't Nicodemus understand the "New Birth"?
Ezekiel 18:24 But when the righteous turneth away from his righteousness, and committeth iniquity, and doeth according to all the abominations that the wicked man doeth, shall he live? All his righteousness that he hath done shall not be mentioned: in his trespass that he hath trespassed, and in his sin that he hath sinned, in them shall he die.
Seven church ages (dispensations)
Seven Angels or MESSENGERS
Seven attributes of Jesus
Seven Seals
Seven THUNDERS!
10 For who hath despised the day of small things? For they shall rejoice, and shall see the plummet in the hand of Zerubbabel with those seven; They are the eyes of the Lord, which run to and fro through the whole earth. Zech. 4 KJV.
The mystery of the seven stars which thou sawest in my right hand, and the seven golden candlesticks. The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches: and the seven candlesticks which thou sawest are the seven churches.
12 Wherefore I will not be negligent to put you always in remembrance of these things, though ye know them, and be established in the PRESENT TRUTH. 2 Peter 1 KJV.
Well, he said something wrong. He said, study so God will approve of you. It should be "study to show thyself that you are approved of God already" - there's no process of approval in that verse. We are already approved of God thru Christ and His finished work at the cross. We don't study to be saved or to be justified or even to be approved. Hopefully someone will answer me here.
The point is not to study to be saved from hell, but already being saved to study to shew yourself approved unto God, a workman. Salvation is not of works, but studying God's word takes work and labour inorder to be approved by God and avoid heresies.
1 Corinthians 11:19 (KJV) For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you.
1 Timothy 5:17 (KJV) Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour, especially they who labour in the word and doctrine.
Salvation is a free gift without works, but rightly dividing the word of truth does require study, work (WORKman), and labour in the word and doctine.
@@timchess2313 there’s no ‘To be approved’ in the verse - you put that in and thats eisegesis.
Study to show thyself , not to God, that you are approved already. You are complete in Christ so approved already - there’s nothing to prove to God for Christ is enough unless you dont think so.
I cor 11:19 pertains to your judgement thru doctrine who are approved and not
@@timchess2313 rightly dividing is as simple as determining what verse pertains to law and what pertains to grace. In Rom 6:14 we are not under law but under grace however we look at scripture as if all are laws and that needs right dividing.
@@cussewago 11:55 - he said study TO BE approved to God. There's no TO BE in the kjv verse.
A Saved Sinner can be Ashamed Where? Well the Judgment Seat of Christ of course not the Great White Throne Judgment.
46 minutes
103:30
I have a question for any Ruckman follower who cares to answer.
How was Lot saved?
In 2 Peter chapter 2 Lot is described as just, righteous and godly. There is no record of him performing any good works. The last we hear of Lot is that he's passed out drunk, fornicating with his daughters.
How was Lot saved?
I used to wonder too, I didn't realize that until Moses brought down the 10 commands to the Jews they weren't under the laws yet, Abraham, Issac and Jacob etc didn't even have those law's. Ruckman explains this in another class he taught sorry I don't remember which one, does this help you. I hope so, God bless you, sir
@@LadyDi820 Thanks for responding. This is a very important issue. I'll get back to you soon. God bless you Diane.
@@LadyDi820 Sorry for the delay.
The reason I asked the question concerning Lot's salvation to the Ruckman followers is to show them that they cannot answer it.
They, following Ruckman, teach that men before the Law, under the Law, and during the tribulation are saved by their own works.
This is heresy.
The apostle Paul, before giving any instructions to the church, devotes the first 5 chapters of Romans to showing clearly that no man, before the cross or after can be saved by his own works. All are "under sin". In Adam all die.
Some quotes from Ruckman concerning the way of salvation for those alive during the tribulation:
"In the tribulation it's endurance, it's by works."
"You better work, work, work, work."
"You better keep the 10 commandments and not bust one... and then some...".
"You better not make one mistake".
"Don't get excited, you're going to hell anyway."
Ruckman devoted his life to promoting himself as some sort of bible genius with an understanding of scripture above all others.
His followers hold him as such. Truth is that Ruckman was a boastful, cunning, heretical nut.
There is a You-tube channel called edwardpf123. I suggest you go to it.
In the playlists section, you will find several videos where Ed exposes Ruckman as the liar and heretic that he was and Ed explains
dispensationalism clearly and biblically.
Ruckman and his followers will only lead you into confusion and error, Diane. Be careful. God bless you. Amen.
@@LadyDi820 This doesn't really make sense to me. If those after the law needed the law because they needed their sins covered in order to go to Abraham's bosom to wait for Jesus, why didn't Lot need his sins covered?
Lot was justified through his obedience. The LORD told him to leave Sodom and Gomorrha. Imagine if he had now "faith only" - "Yes Lord I believe that you're going to blow this place up, but I'll stay here ignoring your commandment that you gave me." His faith would've been in vain (James 2). Imagine Noah saying "yes Lord I have faith in your words that you'll bring the flood, but I prefer not to obey your commandment to build this ark." Imagine Abraham saying, "yes Lord I believe in your promises but I'll stay here in my own Land."
In this context faith without works is dead, since you didn't justify your faith through your obedience.
th-cam.com/video/Mz4OIP56U4w/w-d-xo.html
Dispensational teaching that you can't fall away from the faith. That why it's ok to remarry after divorce. Even though Jesus and Paul said you can't rermarry as long as the first spouse is living. Paul wrote to the Galatians 5:19-21 tells who will not inherit the kingdom of God. Adultery is one of the reason. Paul and Jesus said to be remarry as long as your first spouse is living you are living in ADULTERY!!!! "THINK ABOUT IT"
Matthew 19:9 (KJV) And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.
Jesus allowed for fornication as a legitimate reason to end a marriage.
1 Corinthians 7:15 (KJV) But if the unbelieving depart, let him depart. A brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases: but God hath called us to peace.
Paul said if an unbeliever leaves a believer that it is permitted to let them go and that a believer is not under bondage to fight and try to force the unbeliever to stay married because God has called us to peace.
Also for the record in the case of fornication Dr Ruckman recommended trying to forgive and forget and try to keep the marriage if possible especially when children are involved.
We are not under the law! We are saved by Grace through Faith in the shed blood of Jesus Christ plus nothing!
@@kauaifishing1365 Agree!!! But Grace doesn't give anyone to live in sin. Paul made that clear in Romans 6:1-2 What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God forbid.
70 year old
Come let USA all go up tWo zion its a SONg i learned years ago by a pianon player named Dan thank you Jesus for Dan Owens
Wow what a false teaching here. Dispensationals is not a biblical doctrine and it teaches the hearsay of different ways of salvation through the ages, when it’s clear in the bible its ALWAYS been by FAITH alone
There is NOT one way to be saved in the Old Testament and a different way to be saved in the New Testament.
That would be TWO different gospels.
There wasn’t one way for the Jew to be saved, and now a different way for the gentile to be saved.
That would be TWO roads to Heaven.
There’s only ONE road to Heaven.
Jesus said: “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no man comes to the Father but by Me” (John 14:6).
In the Old Testament, they were saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone, looking ahead to the coming of Christ.
Jesus said in John 8:56,
Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day and he saw it and was glad.
Jesus was speaking PAST tense there.
Abraham was looking ahead to the coming of Christ while BELIEVING in Him.
Today we are saved by looking BACK to the FIRST coming of Christ, who He died on the Cross bearing our sins.
In the Old Testament, they simply looked ahead to the coming of Christ.
But we ALL meet at the foot of the Cross.
It is by GRACE alone, through FAITH alone, in Christ ALONE that anyone is saved.
I have an Old Testament verse for anyone who will read.
Genesis 15:6
And he BELIEVED in the Lord; and he counted it to him for righteousness.
No mention at ALL of WORKS plus FAITH. ONLY BELIEVE.
Romans 4:3
So Abraham BELIEVED God,
and it was counted to him as righteousness.
When Paul makes his case for justification by FAITH in the book of Romans, he doesn’t cite the example of how Matthew was converted, or how Mark was converted, or Luke, or John.
Paul goes back to the Old Testament.
In Romans chapter 4,
Paul uses the examples of Abraham and David to teach in the New Testament there how someone was justified by FAITH in the Old Testament.
It's undeniable.
And in Romans 1:17,
Paul says,
For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from FAITH to FAITH:
as it is written, The just shall live by faith.
This was quoting Habakkuk 2:4
from the Old Testament which says,
Behold his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his FAITH.
Paul makes his case in the
New Testament in Romans by quoting the Old Testament, referring to the very same Gospel of Salvation.
Romans 4:2
For if Abraham were justified by WORKS, he hath whereof to glory; but NOT before God.
Meaning if Abraham was justified by WORKS, he has something to boast about, but NOT before God.
Paul had spent much of this letter to the Romans making the point that nobody can be justified-shown to be righteous-before God by following the WORKS of the law.
Look at Romans 1:1-2
1)Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ,
called to be an apostle,
separated unto the Gospel of God.
2) Which he had promised afore by his prophets in the holy scriptures.
That word "afore" means BEFORE.
And the holy scriptures in this verse is referring to the Old Testament.
So these TWO verses can be translated perfectly like this.
Paul, a servant of Christ Jesus,
set apart for the Gospel of God,
which was recorded in
Old Testament Scripture
by the prophets long ago.
So the book of Romans says that the Gospel was recorded in the
Old Testament, and they believed it and were saved.
Just like anyone who BELIEVES it now is saved.
Neither is there Salvation in ANY other: for there is none other name under Heaven given among men whereby we must be saved.
(Acts 4:12).
Salvation is not given and was never given in ANY OTHER way other than BELIEVING in Jesus Christ without WORKS.
Then 1 Timothy 2:5-6
5) For there is ONE God, and ONE mediator between God and men,
the man Christ Jesus;
6) Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.
In verse 6, testified means testimony
and due time means at the proper time.
So how many gods are there?
“One God and one mediator between God and men.”
How many mediators?
One mediator. The man Christ Jesus.
There are as many mediators as there are gods. ONE.
So the Gospel was NOT mediated ANY other way other than the man Christ Jesus.
We must be crystal clear about this.
There’s ONLY ONE God, and there’s ONLY ONE mediator to this God, and that is the man, Christ Jesus.
That is an immutable TRUTH that is as equally true in the Old Testament as it is in the New Testament.
Immutable meaning unchanging over time or unable to be changed.
There’s the old saying,
“If it’s NEW, it’s NOT true.”
So, if you ever hear some NEW way of salvation, you can just mark it OFF as heretic which is the reason you point to why some Christians call you a heretic.
The Bible itself teaches there is ONLY ONE way of Salvation.
Salvation has ALWAYS been and will ALWAYS be by GRACE through FAITH ALONE.
Unfortunately proponents of dispensational salvation have led many to believe that in the old testament, man was saved through a combination of both FAITH and WORKS.
If Salvation was in fact ALSO by WORKS in the Old Testament, then undoubtedly those who lived under the law would have a basis to boast before God.
Ephesians 2:8-9
For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should boast.
Romans 3:27-28
27) Where is boasting then?
It is excluded. By what law?
Of works? Nay: but by the law of faith.
28) Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.
How is the man justified?
By FAITH without the Deeds of the LAW.
It's important to realize that GRACE and WORKS are mutually exclusive.
Meaning if Salvation was by WORKS then it could NOT have been by GRACE.
And if Salvation was by GRACE then it could NOT have been by WORKS.
It is either by GRACE or by WORKS but it cannot be BOTH.
Romans 11:6
And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then it is no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.
So it cannot be BOTH.
Many mistakenly identify the LAW as a means of justification rather than a mirror which reflects man's sinful condition and inability to save himself.
Those who would propose that man at any time in any dispensation be justified by keeping the LAW and doing WORKS do NOT understand the LAW'S demand of perfection and it's purpose specific to Salvation.
In other words, if the law must be kept at ALL, then ALL of the LAW must be kept.
But James 2:10 says,
For whosoever shall keep the whole law and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
Galatians 3:10
For as many as are of the WORKS of the LAW are under the CURSE:
for it is written, cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the LAW to do them.
Does it say cursed is everyone that continuous in SOME things? NO
It says, continuous in ALL things which are written in the book of the law to do them.
Although I agree with dispensations to the point that there are different time periods such as right now we are living in the church age also known as the age of Grace.
And there was at one point the Age of Innocence and there will be the millennial age that is coming.
These are dispensations and although I do agree with different periods of time, the Bible does NOT teach different ways of salvations in different time periods.
It is Biblical that there is ONLY one Salvation for ALL time periods.
I have given MANY scripture verses here both in the Old Testament proving
Peter Ruckman WRONG.
These all put holes in your teaching but it's up to you to relearn your thinking or stay in error.
Read James 2:
22Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect? 23And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God. 24Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.(James 2)
There is a reason why both Paul and James takes Abraham as an example to proof their own point.
Because there are two types of saved people:
9Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision only, or upon the uncircumcision also? for we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness. 10How was it then reckoned? when he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision. 11And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised: that he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also: 12And the father of circumcision to them who are not of the circumcision only, but who also walk in the steps of that faith of our father Abraham, which he had being yet uncircumcised.(Romans 4)
1.Those who keep the law and also have faith in the Lord:
And the father of circumcision to them who are not of the circumcision only, but who also walk in the steps of that faith of our father Abraham, which he had being yet uncircumcised.
2. Those who do not keep the law but have faith in the Lord:
that he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also
Paul is using Abraham's example to demonstrate how group 2 is saved.
James is using Abraham's example to demonstrate how group 1 is saved:
1James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting. (James 1)
Twelve tribes. He was writing to the Jews. The blood atonement of the Lord Jesus Christ is in effect when He died on the cross and raised from the dead, the church started there. But the gospel of Jesus Christ was not preached until Paul had the revelation from the Lord Jesus Christ.
Read Galatians 1 and 2, and compare them with Acts 15. You will see how the early church in Jerusalem agreed that the gospel that Paul preached is correct that the church is not saved by keeping the law, but by believing in the Lord Jesus Christ. Also compare the preaching by Peter in Acts 2, he never mention the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ and that He died for our sins once. And also see in the Acts 10, Peter still think that he needs to keep the law (He refuse to eat the fourfooted beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and fowls of the air in the vision).
Not only that, in the tribulation period, people are not saved by faith in the Lord Jesus Christ alone:
Revelation 14:12 King James Bible
Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.
They must believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and KEEP THE COMMANDMENTS OF GOD to be saved.
Dude theres like 7 gospels . Just on the top of my head here is a few. The one Jesus preached was faith and works. Jesus said if your hand causes you to sin cut it off.
What peter preaches in acts 2:38 is faith and works different then in acts 10 which is faith alone.
A dispensation of the gospel was given to paul 1 corinthians 15:1-4
Hebrews 4:2 the gospel given to moses
Galatians 3 the gospel given to abraham.
Revelations 14:6 another gospel
Luke chpt 1
Look up 7 gospels by Robert Breaker for the other ones.
Seems to not give a accurate view point on pauline dispensationalists then tare the false narrative down and look right.
Not sure about that, I am sure he presenting what hypers taught in his day, or atleast the one's he disagreed with. He believed in water baptism, he believed the gospel of salvation by grace through faith in the finished work of Christ was taught in Peter's epistles. He believed a Christian should confess their sins according to 1 John 1:9. Among other thing s that many Hyperdispensationalists don't believe.
@@timchess2313 to bad he didn't understand or believe this
Galatians 2:7-9 KJVS
But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; [8] (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:) [9] And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.
@@timchess2313 I more hyper than this but it's a start for those who don't know the difference between Paul the twelve and a 4 gospel Jesus vs a resurrected Jesus ministry. th-cam.com/video/aPYRQZikQIE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=X5vxvwP2ptLEHDt_
KJV Acts 28 has Paul and other believers healing foke. It the book of Romans where the Dispensation of Grace begins. Paul is now unable to heal 2Tim 4:20.
fact... won't share
fact... censors
fact... God is the Judge
maybe your health issues ARE related...thanks for the video
I gotta tell you. I've seen some unbelievably FEEBLE theological minds in my time. But this guy truly takes the dispensational taco! Yikes and triple yikes!
In the words of the “great” Peter Ruckman: “Amen, Amen, Amen”
There is NOT one way to be saved in the Old Testament and a different way to be saved in the New Testament.
That would be TWO different gospels.
There wasn’t one way for the Jew to be saved, and now a different way for the gentile to be saved.
That would be TWO roads to Heaven.
There’s only ONE road to Heaven.
Jesus said: “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no man comes to the Father but by Me” (John 14:6).
In the Old Testament, they were saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone, looking ahead to the coming of Christ.
Jesus said in John 8:56,
Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day and he saw it and was glad.
Jesus was speaking PAST tense there.
Abraham was looking ahead to the coming of Christ while BELIEVING in Him.
Today we are saved by looking BACK to the FIRST coming of Christ, who He died on the Cross bearing our sins.
In the Old Testament, they simply looked ahead to the coming of Christ.
But we ALL meet at the foot of the Cross.
It is by GRACE alone, through FAITH alone, in Christ ALONE that anyone is saved.
I have an Old Testament verse for anyone who will read.
Genesis 15:6
And he BELIEVED in the Lord; and he counted it to him for righteousness.
No mention at ALL of WORKS plus FAITH. ONLY BELIEVE.
Romans 4:3
So Abraham BELIEVED God,
and it was counted to him as righteousness.
When Paul makes his case for justification by FAITH in the book of Romans, he doesn’t cite the example of how Matthew was converted, or how Mark was converted, or Luke, or John.
Paul goes back to the Old Testament.
In Romans chapter 4,
Paul uses the examples of Abraham and David to teach in the New Testament there how someone was justified by FAITH in the Old Testament.
It's undeniable.
And in Romans 1:17,
Paul says,
For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from FAITH to FAITH:
as it is written, The just shall live by faith.
This was quoting Habakkuk 2:4
from the Old Testament which says,
Behold his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his FAITH.
Paul makes his case in the
New Testament in Romans by quoting the Old Testament, referring to the very same Gospel of Salvation.
Romans 4:2
For if Abraham were justified by WORKS, he hath whereof to glory; but NOT before God.
Meaning if Abraham was justified by WORKS, he has something to boast about, but NOT before God.
Paul had spent much of this letter to the Romans making the point that nobody can be justified-shown to be righteous-before God by following the WORKS of the law.
Look at Romans 1:1-2
1)Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ,
called to be an apostle,
separated unto the Gospel of God.
2) Which he had promised afore by his prophets in the holy scriptures.
That word "afore" means BEFORE.
And the holy scriptures in this verse is referring to the Old Testament.
So these TWO verses can be translated perfectly like this.
Paul, a servant of Christ Jesus,
set apart for the Gospel of God,
which was recorded in
Old Testament Scripture
by the prophets long ago.
So the book of Romans says that the Gospel was recorded in the
Old Testament, and they believed it and were saved.
Just like anyone who BELIEVES it now is saved.
Neither is there Salvation in ANY other: for there is none other name under Heaven given among men whereby we must be saved.
(Acts 4:12).
Salvation is not given and was never given in ANY OTHER way other than BELIEVING in Jesus Christ without WORKS.
Then 1 Timothy 2:5-6
5) For there is ONE God, and ONE mediator between God and men,
the man Christ Jesus;
6) Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.
In verse 6, testified means testimony
and due time means at the proper time.
So how many gods are there?
“One God and one mediator between God and men.”
How many mediators?
One mediator. The man Christ Jesus.
There are as many mediators as there are gods. ONE.
So the Gospel was NOT mediated ANY other way other than the man Christ Jesus.
We must be crystal clear about this.
There’s ONLY ONE God, and there’s ONLY ONE mediator to this God, and that is the man, Christ Jesus.
That is an immutable TRUTH that is as equally true in the Old Testament as it is in the New Testament.
Immutable meaning unchanging over time or unable to be changed.
There’s the old saying,
“If it’s NEW, it’s NOT true.”
So, if you ever hear some NEW way of salvation, you can just mark it OFF as heretic which is the reason you point to why some Christians call you a heretic.
The Bible itself teaches there is ONLY ONE way of Salvation.
Salvation has ALWAYS been and will ALWAYS be by GRACE through FAITH ALONE.
Unfortunately proponents of dispensational salvation have led many to believe that in the old testament, man was saved through a combination of both FAITH and WORKS.
If Salvation was in fact ALSO by WORKS in the Old Testament, then undoubtedly those who lived under the law would have a basis to boast before God.
Ephesians 2:8-9
For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should boast.
Romans 3:27-28
27) Where is boasting then?
It is excluded. By what law?
Of works? Nay: but by the law of faith.
28) Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.
How is the man justified?
By FAITH without the Deeds of the LAW.
It's important to realize that GRACE and WORKS are mutually exclusive.
Meaning if Salvation was by WORKS then it could NOT have been by GRACE.
And if Salvation was by GRACE then it could NOT have been by WORKS.
It is either by GRACE or by WORKS but it cannot be BOTH.
Romans 11:6
And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then it is no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.
So it cannot be BOTH.
Many mistakenly identify the LAW as a means of justification rather than a mirror which reflects man's sinful condition and inability to save himself.
Those who would propose that man at any time in any dispensation be justified by keeping the LAW and doing WORKS do NOT understand the LAW'S demand of perfection and it's purpose specific to Salvation.
In other words, if the law must be kept at ALL, then ALL of the LAW must be kept.
But James 2:10 says,
For whosoever shall keep the whole law and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
Galatians 3:10
For as many as are of the WORKS of the LAW are under the CURSE:
for it is written, cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the LAW to do them.
Does it say cursed is everyone that continuous in SOME things? NO
It says, continuous in ALL things which are written in the book of the law to do them.
Although I agree with dispensations to the point that there are different time periods such as right now we are living in the church age also known as the age of Grace.
And there was at one point the Age of Innocence and there will be the millennial age that is coming.
These are dispensations and although I do agree with different periods of time, the Bible does NOT teach different ways of salvations in different time periods.
It is Biblical that there is ONLY one Salvation for ALL time periods.
I have given MANY scripture verses here both in the Old Testament proving
Peter Ruckman WRONG.
These all put holes in your teaching but it's up to you to relearn your thinking or stay in error.
The Bible makes it 100% clear that in the OT, Abraham was justified by faith ALONE in Genesis 15:5-6 when God makes his Covenant with Abraham.
(The Abrahamic Covenant) which Paul reaffirms in Romans 4:20-21.
Those who teach that Abraham was justified by sacrificing Isaac at the altar (saved by works) 30 years later in Genesis 22 then IGNORE Genesis 15 where the scripture EXPLICITLY states that Abraham BELIEVED God and Abraham's FAITH was counted as righteousness.
The Bible teaches that both Abraham and King David were saved by FAITH apart from WORKS but these hyperdispensationalists teach they were saved by FAITH and WORKS in the Old Testament and that is absolutely WRONG and a complete misunderstanding of the Bible.
@@organiclife4042 It’s sad to see somebody like you in such gross error. No one needs to be saved. It’s all tactics to control individuals. Unfortunately it’s people like you have been caught up in religion and drug down to the depth of darkness. I wish you luck in your endeavors and maybe one day, you will be set free from such nonsense.
@@organiclife4042
Pay close attention. I’m gonna clear the muddy water for you.
Ugly, ugly teaching! Please brothers and sisters in Christ. “Be like the Berean’s”. Acts 17:11
This teaching is biblical. He just proved it.
I think that's exactly what The Lord is telling YOU Greg Searle to do. Your one line retort isn't going to sway the rest of us who watched the entire thing and actually did search each scripture he mentioned.
Got some scripture to back that up?
A meaningless comment. Read your KJV. Pray about it. God might show you the path.
I searched the scriptures to see if it was so and guess what? It is so. Dispensational Salvation and the doctrine as a whole is the most honest, consistent and unifying method of Bible teaching and interpretation there is. You can try to show me something else but I really doubt you can. No offense.
_Peter Ruckman is dead, yet his nonsense lives on
Yes,he taught the King James Version,the Devil said,thought same thing,it's easy to think that way,are you teaching the KJV to your children,I don't think so, without looking at the Word of God,how many KJV Bible verses you Memorize,that's what I thought,Repent of Your Sins,you pass this Attitude to others,like your Grand children s
The Bible makes it 100% clear that in the OT, Abraham was justified by faith ALONE in Genesis 15:5-6 when God makes his Covenant with Abraham.
(The Abrahamic Covenant) which Paul reaffirms in Romans 4:20-21.
Those who teach that Abraham was justified by sacrificing Isaac at the altar (saved by works) 30 years later in Genesis 22 then IGNORE Genesis 15 where the scripture EXPLICITLY states that Abraham BELIEVED God and Abraham's FAITH was counted as righteousness.
The Bible teaches that both Abraham and King David were saved by FAITH apart from WORKS but these hyperdispensationalists teach they were saved by FAITH and WORKS in the Old Testament and that is absolutely WRONG and a complete misunderstanding of the Bible.
There is NOT one way to be saved in the Old Testament and a different way to be saved in the New Testament.
That would be TWO different gospels.
There wasn’t one way for the Jew to be saved, and now a different way for the gentile to be saved.
That would be TWO roads to Heaven.
There’s only ONE road to Heaven.
Jesus said: “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no man comes to the Father but by Me” (John 14:6).
In the Old Testament, they were saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone, looking ahead to the coming of Christ.
Jesus said in John 8:56,
Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day and he saw it and was glad.
Jesus was speaking PAST tense there.
Abraham was looking ahead to the coming of Christ while BELIEVING in Him.
Today we are saved by looking BACK to the FIRST coming of Christ, who He died on the Cross bearing our sins.
In the Old Testament, they simply looked ahead to the coming of Christ.
But we ALL meet at the foot of the Cross.
It is by GRACE alone, through FAITH alone, in Christ ALONE that anyone is saved.
I have an Old Testament verse for anyone who will read.
Genesis 15:6
And he BELIEVED in the Lord; and he counted it to him for righteousness.
No mention at ALL of WORKS plus FAITH. ONLY BELIEVE.
Romans 4:3
So Abraham BELIEVED God,
and it was counted to him as righteousness.
When Paul makes his case for justification by FAITH in the book of Romans, he doesn’t cite the example of how Matthew was converted, or how Mark was converted, or Luke, or John.
Paul goes back to the Old Testament.
In Romans chapter 4,
Paul uses the examples of Abraham and David to teach in the New Testament there how someone was justified by FAITH in the Old Testament.
It's undeniable.
And in Romans 1:17,
Paul says,
For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from FAITH to FAITH:
as it is written, The just shall live by faith.
This was quoting Habakkuk 2:4
from the Old Testament which says,
Behold his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his FAITH.
Paul makes his case in the
New Testament in Romans by quoting the Old Testament, referring to the very same Gospel of Salvation.
Romans 4:2
For if Abraham were justified by WORKS, he hath whereof to glory; but NOT before God.
Meaning if Abraham was justified by WORKS, he has something to boast about, but NOT before God.
Paul had spent much of this letter to the Romans making the point that nobody can be justified-shown to be righteous-before God by following the WORKS of the law.
Look at Romans 1:1-2
1)Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ,
called to be an apostle,
separated unto the Gospel of God.
2) Which he had promised afore by his prophets in the holy scriptures.
That word "afore" means BEFORE.
And the holy scriptures in this verse is referring to the Old Testament.
So these TWO verses can be translated perfectly like this.
Paul, a servant of Christ Jesus,
set apart for the Gospel of God,
which was recorded in
Old Testament Scripture
by the prophets long ago.
So the book of Romans says that the Gospel was recorded in the
Old Testament, and they believed it and were saved.
Just like anyone who BELIEVES it now is saved.
Neither is there Salvation in ANY other: for there is none other name under Heaven given among men whereby we must be saved.
(Acts 4:12).
Salvation is not given and was never given in ANY OTHER way other than BELIEVING in Jesus Christ without WORKS.
Then 1 Timothy 2:5-6
5) For there is ONE God, and ONE mediator between God and men,
the man Christ Jesus;
6) Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.
In verse 6, testified means testimony
and due time means at the proper time.
So how many gods are there?
“One God and one mediator between God and men.”
How many mediators?
One mediator. The man Christ Jesus.
There are as many mediators as there are gods. ONE.
So the Gospel was NOT mediated ANY other way other than the man Christ Jesus.
We must be crystal clear about this.
There’s ONLY ONE God, and there’s ONLY ONE mediator to this God, and that is the man, Christ Jesus.
That is an immutable TRUTH that is as equally true in the Old Testament as it is in the New Testament.
Immutable meaning unchanging over time or unable to be changed.
There’s the old saying,
“If it’s NEW, it’s NOT true.”
So, if you ever hear some NEW way of salvation, you can just mark it OFF as heretic which is the reason you point to why some Christians call you a heretic.
The Bible itself teaches there is ONLY ONE way of Salvation.
Salvation has ALWAYS been and will ALWAYS be by GRACE through FAITH ALONE.
Unfortunately proponents of dispensational salvation have led many to believe that in the old testament, man was saved through a combination of both FAITH and WORKS.
If Salvation was in fact ALSO by WORKS in the Old Testament, then undoubtedly those who lived under the law would have a basis to boast before God.
Ephesians 2:8-9
For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should boast.
Romans 3:27-28
27) Where is boasting then?
It is excluded. By what law?
Of works? Nay: but by the law of faith.
28) Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.
How is the man justified?
By FAITH without the Deeds of the LAW.
It's important to realize that GRACE and WORKS are mutually exclusive.
Meaning if Salvation was by WORKS then it could NOT have been by GRACE.
And if Salvation was by GRACE then it could NOT have been by WORKS.
It is either by GRACE or by WORKS but it cannot be BOTH.
Romans 11:6
And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then it is no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.
So it cannot be BOTH.
Many mistakenly identify the LAW as a means of justification rather than a mirror which reflects man's sinful condition and inability to save himself.
Those who would propose that man at any time in any dispensation be justified by keeping the LAW and doing WORKS do NOT understand the LAW'S demand of perfection and it's purpose specific to Salvation.
In other words, if the law must be kept at ALL, then ALL of the LAW must be kept.
But James 2:10 says,
For whosoever shall keep the whole law and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
Galatians 3:10
For as many as are of the WORKS of the LAW are under the CURSE:
for it is written, cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the LAW to do them.
Does it say cursed is everyone that continuous in SOME things? NO
It says, continuous in ALL things which are written in the book of the law to do them.
Although I agree with dispensations to the point that there are different time periods such as right now we are living in the church age also known as the age of Grace.
And there was at one point the Age of Innocence and there will be the millennial age that is coming.
These are dispensations and although I do agree with different periods of time, the Bible does NOT teach different ways of salvations in different time periods.
It is Biblical that there is ONLY one Salvation for ALL time periods.
I have given MANY scripture verses here both in the Old Testament proving
Peter Ruckman WRONG.
These all put holes in your teaching but it's up to you to relearn your thinking or stay in error.
@@organiclife4042 Name one person who was saved before Christ's resurrection. I'll wait.
@@jeremybingham3708
Adam