EXPLODED RODS Part 2

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 2.9K

  • @tools6106
    @tools6106 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    When I first saw all 8 rods broken my reaction was a metallurgy failure, not possible to fracture 8 rods in the same spot without it being a defect in base metal! I’ve seen stretched rods from ultra high rpm, split from end to end from overpressure and you never see all the rods broken even in a catastrophic failure in top fuel! It just doesn’t happen, I am sorry you have to go through this Steve but the rest of us out here would figure human error like did I forget to torque the rods! Just not possible! Thank you for being so transparent, gives me faith. I split a head open on my fresh built ford diesel Thursday, a brand new head failed. Asking myself a million questions, I’ll have it apart this week, betting on a casting line split,,,, I hope!

  • @lunkydog
    @lunkydog 2 ปีที่แล้ว +344

    You've got such a positive attitude. Truly an inspiration for all of us.

    • @ZEPRATGERNODT
      @ZEPRATGERNODT 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Agreed. It also helps when you have a few bucks in your pocket and NOT scraping payday to payday.

    • @bicylindrico
      @bicylindrico 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Not having your last dollar in the engine helps Just good fun then!

    • @JonHop1
      @JonHop1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@ZEPRATGERNODT Imagine if you saved up 10 years for a build like this and all 8 rods fail at once lol... Bruh.. after crying for a couple hours Id probably consider ending it all! lol.(kidding obviously)

    • @ZEPRATGERNODT
      @ZEPRATGERNODT 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@JonHop1 there are those situations where you want to cry because you're so made and all you can do is laugh cause WTH.

    • @randymccollum7876
      @randymccollum7876 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I was just going to say that. I'm looking at a mess and he just nonchalant oh it's not to bad.. lol

  • @mrray55
    @mrray55 2 ปีที่แล้ว +129

    I still think it's a metallurgy issue. Those rods where more than likely cut out of the same slug. That's why they all broke in the same area.

    • @timcustomrc
      @timcustomrc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      This is the most likely explanation based on my experience as a machinist. Have seen this type of break due to flaws in the metal and also incorrectly labeled material. Have had to throw out many parts due to suppliers sending the incorrect or low quality material.

    • @Avboden
      @Avboden 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Wait, was anyone thinking otherwise? It's the only logical conclusion.

    • @tdwz1652
      @tdwz1652 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Avboden im still not convinced by the math 😁 😈

    • @mattymccolgan9453
      @mattymccolgan9453 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yes definitely bad metal

    • @lordmordecai2211
      @lordmordecai2211 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      yeah no doubt. The shearing at the piston and the break marks on the chunks that were rod definitely show it to be a metallurgical issue. No hate on the manufacturer, they probably wouldn't have even known it was an issue until they all said nope in unison, glad most of the motor is saveable though, you definitely build motor that can survive severe unscheduled abuse steve

  • @MrSoupsnake
    @MrSoupsnake ปีที่แล้ว +1

    50% of Steve's time on his videos is pure, quality education. The other 50% is addressing the keyboard warriors and shade tree know-it-alls. Steve's patience with You Tube comments is exceptional.

  • @tomroe7715
    @tomroe7715 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Been a mechanic for 35 years and built countless motors and transmissions. You are the only person i listen to about motor info. Truly appreciated!!!!!

  • @demoderby181
    @demoderby181 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    I love how far you go to prove people wrong that haven’t got ALL the facts, and don’t know what they’re talking about!!! Keyboard mechanics are the worst. People will talk straight out of their 💩hole to try and prove themselves to be right and you to be wrong. You would be the VERY LAST person I would try to tell that it was done wrong. Keep up the awesome work!! Love seeing the builds!!

    • @nostromo9076
      @nostromo9076 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Steve is ruining the internet with facts and logic. Keyboard mechanics are gonna have to go elsewhere!

    • @scottandison1086
      @scottandison1086 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I like the comments about blown head gaskets when it has closed decks.
      Or the comment about the rods stretching.
      Morons man.
      Steve teaches Critical thinking

  • @timrhodes1452
    @timrhodes1452 2 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    I spent several years working in a Texas shop that puts out some of the baddest dirt car engines money can buy and have seen the insanity of probably every kind of engine failure imaginable. Except for this one.....the amount of destruction along side the lack of destruction has got my brain working overtime. Without actually having broken parts in hand I would say that the only way 8 rods break simultaneously without killing the crank would have to be a flawed set of rods

    • @JoshuaHowley
      @JoshuaHowley 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I agree, I thinknit comes down to the metallurgy of the rods. One started to go, vibration killed the rest VERY quickly.

    • @davidsoper2884
      @davidsoper2884 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That would also be my guess also. That it is material and grain structure and design.

    • @confuse9
      @confuse9 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I agree with your theory - simply because I don't see any way on that motor that a failure in on cylinder or pair of cylinder would cause another cylinder to break (with almost no damage to the block). If it was 'tune' related, I would think the piston or heads would show the damage first.
      So if it was the rods and they all let go at almost the exact RPM - that is something for the rod-manufacturer to sort out. Of course my highest boost car is 16 psi so.....

    • @mikegordon3436
      @mikegordon3436 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whos rods are they?

    • @AlScrap25
      @AlScrap25 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mikegordon3436 FFWD Racing Rods

  • @willecutlip
    @willecutlip 2 ปีที่แล้ว +113

    Watched the engine build up video again and the “new” rods have a double rectangular recess machined out of the main beam versus a single recess in the “old” rods. The recesses are also two different sizes. This could be easily result in a stress concentration at the mid point of the beam (between the two machined out recesses. Add in that a T6 heat treatment actually reduces the fracture toughness of 7075, and you’ve got a recipe for a catastrophic fracture failure under cyclical loading. The fact that all 8 failed is a strong indicator of a design flaw that didn’t play nice with the grain structure of the aluminum.

    • @nathan584
      @nathan584 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      That's exactly what I was thinking and likely what happened

    • @breckhedrick8692
      @breckhedrick8692 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I seen the rod. aluminum holds up on fuel cars .but one run and throw away this guy punished this engine so many times with big boost .. rod failure 100%

    • @jayirving6996
      @jayirving6996 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      100% agree but he's gonna dazzle ya with bullshit to protect the rod manufacturer.. but bet he never uses that rod again in that application..

    • @MJPilote
      @MJPilote 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@breckhedrick8692 Ever come across component lifecycle prediction / analysis? Guy builds engines for a living, and just mindlessly runing the part till failure? I belive the rods have predicted lifespan and it was not correct or material for the analysis was different than the rods in the engine.

    • @jayirving6996
      @jayirving6996 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@MJPilote those 1/4 mile guys do go certain number of passes prior to rebuild..

  • @mattthemorningafter
    @mattthemorningafter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    I'm so glad cleetus sent me here. Steve is a mechanical genius. I learn so much every single video. I really respect the way you explain each and every thing to us. Thanks for the info and the video itself.

  • @metalted6128
    @metalted6128 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    100% rod problem
    They didn’t bend, they shattered!!
    Your on point, Steve

  • @bartonmd
    @bartonmd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    That's a great video! Having said that, I'm also an engineer, and I've also got the "If everybody understood this, we wouldn't be arguing. Here's how this works..." thing; and I've spent so much time trying on the Internet over the last 21-22 years, explaining things to people at all levels of knowledge, and largely beating my head against the wall doing so. People used to listen and learn, or at the very least, understand what you're talking about and just have a different hypothesis. Seems like these days, there are SOOOO many people at the far upper left of the Dunning-Kruger graph, and seemingly permanently stuck there, that it's almost just not worth our time. I still get enough people to understand concepts that I haven't given up and still explain things, but there are and more people who are seemingly just unreachable.

    • @SecurityHawk12
      @SecurityHawk12 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Same here...Amen to that.

    • @rpm427sc
      @rpm427sc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I find that sometimes people's ego will cause them to just want to prove their "theory", and they will have no desire to actually use critical thinking and be open to ideas/suggestions from people with way more knowledge than them. When training people like that, I'll tend to just let them fail over and over in hopes they will figure it out, since they will only accept something if it was "their idea", and be completely resistant to any information that comes from an outside source.

    • @bartonmd
      @bartonmd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rpm427sc it's true... More often than not, dealing with car stuff, they attach their ego to their wallet, or rather, what they spent their money on.

    • @Sn0w1981
      @Sn0w1981 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I've been there and I'm not even an engineer. I'll never forget getting ganged up on and ridiculed in a discussion.
      Simply trying my best to explain that an airplane needs less (ground) speed to take off, when taking off with a head-wind. Yes, it's crowded at the peak of "Mount Stupid"!

    • @palleppalsson
      @palleppalsson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@@Sn0w1981 Well we got flat earthers now wich wasnt a thing 30 years ago.

  • @MThompsonjr115
    @MThompsonjr115 2 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    After taking metallurgy classes from our technical center when I worked for Alcoa, it definitely looks like a material failure. I bet if the grain structure was analyzed their would be a definitive answer on that. We saw pictures of examples of aluminum failures and some looked like that. Failures could be related to bad alloy with impurities that caused internal grain issues, poor forging process, etc. I’d really like to know what happened to them. If I still worked at Alcoa I’d try to reach out to our tech center to have them analyzed, but sadly I don’t.

    • @zulumagoo1
      @zulumagoo1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It didnt come from Lake Charles Alcoa. I'm just sayin'. Gotta support Local!

    • @davidwickboldt712
      @davidwickboldt712 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      The fracture breaks make me believe it was treated or aged to add strength, but lose flex. So it didn't bend it just broke. These rods are just to brittle for what SM is doing.

    • @SylvasTSB
      @SylvasTSB 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That's my thought as well. I would be curious to know the pounds force each cylinder is pushing down with on the power stroke. I guarantee the number is well above the strength of those rods, especially since they were not a full solid beam rod (They were solid beam but had machined pockets for weight savings, but also makes them weaker.). Just take a look at top fuel engines. They make so much power they will actually compress a connecting rod and make it shorter, and they use solid beam rods, but they don't shatter.

    • @bradley3549
      @bradley3549 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@davidwickboldt712 I agree. The manufacturer boasts something like 200+ runs in a 2000hp bracket car with a 'proprietary' alloy. As hard as they are, probably great fatigue characteristics. Just not interested in bending, that's for sure. lol

    • @neal6418
      @neal6418 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I commented similarly and then I saw your comment.
      Great minds think alike ?
      lol I absolutely agree with you about grain structure especially after many heat cycles.... or impurities as you eluded to. Thanks 👍👍

  • @davidjohnson8474
    @davidjohnson8474 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Steve I'm really impressed on how transparent you're on everything! When I can afford an engine from you I will!

    • @benburnett8109
      @benburnett8109 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why? so it can blow up like this one?

    • @kevinfunk83
      @kevinfunk83 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@benburnett8109 there’s always 1.

    • @freedomfox8183
      @freedomfox8183 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@benburnett8109 clearly your clueless on how racing works...maybe so he can blow it up like proline or he can blow it up TKM, or Box , or a Texas speed or like a top fuel car or he can blow it up like any other engine in the world they all blow up or your not pushing limits or trying to go faster.. this one didn't blow up until 4,000 plus horsepower and 8600 rpm on a completely brand new never tested rod and now he knows they can't be used in applications this powerful until they are changed enough that's why he tested them in his own engine dipshit .. you see how many hemis and 481xs blew up this year that proline had to fix? No you didn't because you're clueless I forgot and you don't know what racing entails at this level..

    • @davidjohnson8474
      @davidjohnson8474 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@benburnett8109 dude that's Fing RUDE!

    • @stevejones6647
      @stevejones6647 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@benburnett8109 where’s the 4000 hp engine you designed and built yourself?

  • @SlowC10
    @SlowC10 2 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Idd love to see a video of how you do the repairs to the engine block itself. I think seeing the welding and machine work would be cool. Also that engine is pure functional art

  • @sabrejetmo6299
    @sabrejetmo6299 2 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    When I was on the FSAE team, we ran into our wheel centers breaking in high G corners. Our root cause analysis showed that it was the anodizing that was at the heart of the problem. Upon further research, we found that 7075-T6 is extremely sensitive to crack propagation, and putting a super hard layer on the outside, like anodizing, exacerbates the problem, because the aluminum has a very low young's modulus as compared to the anodizing layer, causing hair line cracks as the part went under high stress condition because the aluminum wants to "flex" but the anodizing cant flex as much.
    It may be worth looking into what type aluminum the rods where made out of and what coating was done on it, but it could be as simple as a crack propagation issue. Not to mention, it would explain why all rods broke around the same time.

    • @oldblueaccord2629
      @oldblueaccord2629 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thats cool to know!

    • @SomeTechGuy666
      @SomeTechGuy666 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Very very cool to know that.

    • @JamesPF2D
      @JamesPF2D 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They're not anodized, the black coating is a paint 👌

    • @zz7qvl
      @zz7qvl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@JamesPF2D at 32.06 he mentions "black anodizing" . He'll find out when the metallurgy comes back if it is a material or processing issue. Should probably just stick with tried and true brands that have been used forever at that hp level. Being the first one to use something at a never tried before hp level... expensive beta test failure.

    • @JamesPF2D
      @JamesPF2D 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@zz7qvl well I'm pretty sure Steve is incorrect then, the black coating is the vader coating that the company sell and is for oil shedding..

  • @kennybiggs3944
    @kennybiggs3944 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    It’s awesome when you see a engine builder that is so passionate about his craft to look at every little thing and make sense of it thanks for walking a saw through it it is pretty awesome

  • @jeffthomson1777
    @jeffthomson1777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Your showing us this is teaching all of us what can happen and hopefully how to fix. Your the best engine builder in the Buisness in my opinion Thanks for doing these videos.

  • @theq291
    @theq291 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Watching part 1 and 2 of this video clearly states metal fatigue in my opinion.
    No fault of you or your supplier...curious to know how the manufacturer tested these rods.
    A learning curve for all involved. Move forward and upwards, best of luck.

    • @kcromwell82
      @kcromwell82 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Embrittlement - incorrect tempering. Fatigue would show up in one or a few pieces. But all 8 from the same batch, the metal was just too brittle.

    • @theoldbigmoose
      @theoldbigmoose 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'm opining they were powdered metal rods, hot isostatically pressed, then forged...
      Edit to add: I enjoy a good technical discussion! Though some disagree with me, that is good. What comes into play here is the Mode II fracture toughness (KIIC) of the composite. When under BOTH great stress and great strain, the type of material I describe has shown cases where it "blows up"... i.e. brittle fractures in all planes. Isotropic fracture. We can easily achieve 98ksi in a properly alloyed PM/forged part. These may also be on the edge of a metal/matrix rod. It will be interesting when Steve shares the lab results.

    • @totalyep
      @totalyep 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      No way fatigue would have them all fail at the same time. Not how fatigue works.

    • @MX304
      @MX304 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@totalyep Not fatigue, just incorrect material.

    • @totalyep
      @totalyep 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MX304 well it’s a fast fracture of some kind. Unlikely due to material. It’s probably something caused a massive sudden overload. Definitely not a fatigue failure.

  • @rodcroan6304
    @rodcroan6304 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good show. Much frustration is justified. Rod maker needs to be accountable.

  • @steamdriver6964
    @steamdriver6964 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I had to stop the video just to leave this comment. Please don't ever question the need to help people think objectively and understand things clearly! There is such a shortage of intellectual people like yourself, that we need every single one of you. I hope this helps you to answer that question you ask yourself and keep contributing your valuable time and know you are truly making a difference in many peoples lives. Thanks again Steve

  • @jasonH5997
    @jasonH5997 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    you can see the years of experience in every little area of the engine....this guy's got skillZ

    • @benburnett8109
      @benburnett8109 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Skillz that could not keep a basic engine together?

  • @chrisobrien9334
    @chrisobrien9334 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Thanks Steve for the in-depth explanation. I’m still sticking to my theory of excessive heat treatment which has made the material brittle.
    I’d certainly like to get one of those pistons please. Thanks mate. Support from Victor Harbor South Australia 🇦🇺

  • @malbrandow7382
    @malbrandow7382 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I believe this is a metallurgy problem in the rods.
    Those gernals are in great shape for what has taken place.
    All the best Steve!

    • @benburnett8109
      @benburnett8109 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      journal is how it is spelled. This is obviously a "torque to yield" rod bolt issue. They used the wrong torque spec across the board. The idea that the rods were all machined from the same piece of metal is the DUMBEST IDEA YET TO APPEAR IN DRAG RACING.

    • @seahorse5677
      @seahorse5677 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@benburnett8109 The manufacturer of these rods has confirmed that all of these rods were machined from the same single slab of bar stock

    • @benburnett8109
      @benburnett8109 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@seahorse5677 But the idea that the same flaw existed thru the entire raw stock is the dumbest idea since the first idea that the rods would fail due to a consistent flaw thru the bar stock. This is a misuse of material and a conncting rod bolt failure. It is far more likely that the wrong torque to yield spec was used than the core material had a flaw that went thru the entire length of the material. This is second grade engineering at best. Not a hard problem to figure out. Did you also know that global warming is a fallacy??? Same principal applies.

  • @mpccenturion
    @mpccenturion 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am at 8:24 . I have always asked this ? of myself. Why? And then searched for an answer or a bunch of possibles. Seeing that it is consistent - once the engine hit a certain mark - it came apart at the rods - at the same time. Going back to Mech Mat some 45 yrs ago - the material hit a dynamic load limit. 4000 hp - ok - you are working at much elevated levels from my experience. We had cast iron - and even in a failure - I could rescue a crank almost all of the time. In my day - your crank - and 800 - 1000 - 1500 grit emery paper - and once micro''d I would rebuild in a clean block. Heck in a day or two - we had a running engine - BUT at 300 to 500 hp. I am in awe of the HP you and others get out of these works of art! Much Respect Sir!

  • @MrBobbyCrane
    @MrBobbyCrane 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best attitude in Motorsport I swear. Steve sees a problem and asks us to use critical thinking to help us learn. That is truly selfless and only helps everyone. Thank YOU Steve!

  • @kswis
    @kswis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Excellent! Pistons look gr8 considering what they went through. That last few seconds of life must have been pretty rough. Stoked to see the results of the metallurgy!

  • @rotax636nut5
    @rotax636nut5 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    This is going to be a super interesting series of video's connected to this blow up, your positive attitude towards the whole thing is very impressive, I hope all the evidence of the failures leads you to the correct reason for this event, as a race engine builder myself I would say that if the rods were weak for some reason and they were all equally weak then when equally loaded beyond a failure point then yes they can be expected to all fail together especially as when the initial failure took place a storm of debris shot through the engine from that 1st rod to fail, that must have created a shock wave that precipitated the complete failure as with each rod letting go the shock just kept getting bigger and the debris storm kept getting denser and more violent. Can I suggest that in future use steel or titanium rods. My 2 cents

    • @lofty92
      @lofty92 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      AGREE ! apart from using steel or titanium rods,not at this power level.

    • @steveh.2604
      @steveh.2604 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      People hopefully do not you give you this much grief. You are the king 🤴 of engines.!

  • @SoDogtravels
    @SoDogtravels 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Much respect and thank you Steve for taking the time.

  • @hotrodsonly9148
    @hotrodsonly9148 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is such a privilege to hear someone with such a positive attitude not blaming everyone else for problems, realizing accidents happen, such as a poorly made main stud. Also it's GREAT to hear a christian on youtube. I know you are by your attitude, your language and a heart for others. Way to go Steve and GOD bless!!!!!!!

  • @benedictcampbell7565
    @benedictcampbell7565 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Steve you know your stuff an you also know a lotta people an a lotta people know you keep up the great work bro
    hell ye
    brother

  • @kennethlemke9826
    @kennethlemke9826 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Your the best at taking the time to explain…damage control speaks highly of the quality of parts you use..

  • @GPTarkov
    @GPTarkov 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Great episode Steve. I really love the in depth looks like this. I've never seen an engine expire like this and its awesome how you are showing everyone everything. You are doing the whole car community a service by putting this info out.

  • @johnandcristinfrizellracin2128
    @johnandcristinfrizellracin2128 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    How amazing the rods literally hit the point of material failure. I'm curious what total cylinder pressures were now the manufacturer of the rods knows! (Expensive learning)
    Thanks for the breakdown videos! Steve my wife and I don't ever miss one

    • @dmeemd7787
      @dmeemd7787 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Same here man! I was telling him, he's essentially another Alan Johnson (in the comments section) :)
      Just an incredible engine builder, the staff, their engineering the whole nine yards. Such a great Channel! Lol, actually I kind of excited if I we DO miss a because then it's like hey! Another video to watch, woohoo!

    • @fast97z24
      @fast97z24 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Who was the manufacturer so I can support them.

    • @Paul-oo6uu
      @Paul-oo6uu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@fast97z24 I completley understand where you are coming from because they have been so straightforward. However if he gave the manufacturer there would be people giving hate mail for essentially doing nothing wrong.

  • @dobermanracing
    @dobermanracing 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I've learned so much from watching your videos. I appreciate you taking the time to make these videos.

  • @moosedancer1
    @moosedancer1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Steve thanks for breaking this failure down and sharing your knowledge with us. I will say it again you are a class act.

  • @mikeschian1163
    @mikeschian1163 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    That's crazy. Rebuild, stronger, faster. Great job, Steve

  • @EricksonMachinePerformance
    @EricksonMachinePerformance 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I can't believe how little damage there is for that failure!! Thanks for sharing.

  • @bearded4glory809
    @bearded4glory809 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Steve, i would love a video talking about and showing some of the advancements that have been made throughout your career by you and others. Obviously these cars are the best they have ever been due to people like you pushing the envelope in the tech. A look back would make a cool video or even series i think a lot of us would enjoy. I love listening to guys like you because you share what you know for free and you have probably forgotten more than i know.
    Excited for the giveaway. I would love to have one of those pistons on my shelf!

  • @terrystrength305
    @terrystrength305 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for sharing your insight and knowledge. If more people would sit back and just listen, instead of posting their one unsubstantiated thought, they would know something!

  • @nwa7265
    @nwa7265 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Steve, I love the videos! Honesty I like watching your videos over anything on TH-cam. I also like that you make long videos and that you really go deep and explain what’s going on. Don’t listen to any of the haters, you know your stuff. Keep up the great work and I look forward to more videos!

  • @rogermacdearmid4380
    @rogermacdearmid4380 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Steve, you are a true master in your innate ability to teach the theory of operation of one of these beasts. As an engineer, I appreciate the adage that “you can’t argue with math”. So appreciate your transparency and willingness to teach us all. I’d frame one of your pistons and put it up in my shop.

  • @Calvin-xp4qp
    @Calvin-xp4qp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Amazing to see that the engine/block contained all that energy. Incredible

  • @jalo1739
    @jalo1739 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Actually, these rods are awesome! They shattered instead of damaging the whole engine. They are great for their limitation and the engine is still fixable. Thanks Steve for the great info

  • @davidduffield7553
    @davidduffield7553 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for taking time to show us what a modern motor looks like, in pieces of course.

  • @kylee4307
    @kylee4307 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    love the channel and the true teardown of this motor, your not hiding anything or making excuses. Cant wait to find out what you think happened.

  • @leehearsey
    @leehearsey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    really interesting video, reminds me of reading about GMs development when they went drag racing with the Ecotec, they published the development programme data and had all four stock rods fail at once on the dyno when they reached their limit

  • @mazcatii
    @mazcatii 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I'd really like to see how you save that block, can you do an upload on that process because to my complete novice mind it looks shagged. Loving your content mate. Cheers from Queensland Australia 😎✊

    • @scraverX
      @scraverX 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Seconded. Looks peened and pitted to heck and back.

    • @nordic5490
      @nordic5490 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Aluminium is easy to weld

  • @kellycarner4472
    @kellycarner4472 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Steve I like that you read the comments, I’m a 3D mechanical designer and understand how frustrating it is when people that don’t have accurate understanding try to blame/ say what caused something to happen, me I like the data then make informed conclusion.. thank you for taking the time and effort and giving us the data. Please keep it up.

  • @204_jseries6
    @204_jseries6 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for answering my "modified rod" question !!! You truly shine in this industry!!

  • @Bill-flatplanefool
    @Bill-flatplanefool 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I love how big the oil returns are in this engine.

  • @kilgorefamily76
    @kilgorefamily76 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    This is a good episode. Amazing that the top looks so good with the crank going full metal shredder for a few seconds. If you were doing this for a customer would you recommend salvaging most of the original engine or sell them a new short block?

  • @ShainAndrews
    @ShainAndrews 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    30:15 That is one of the money shots. I needed to see at least one unmolested fracture line. There was one other rod end I wanted to see as well, but that is good enough. Still like to rough out the stress calculation. Machining will have a greater influence on the failure mode than anodizing, but neither of them will outrank material selection.

    • @palleppalsson
      @palleppalsson 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That chunk looks like a layer sheared off. Don't think Alu supposed behave that way or?

    • @ShainAndrews
      @ShainAndrews 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@palleppalsson Depending on the alloy they can. That fracture is not indicative of sheer, but rather compressive, possibly tensile. Tough to estimate on a video with such short glimpses. It most certainly did not possess enough ductile qualities for that application. Might be a seven series alloy.

  • @joshmontgomery9488
    @joshmontgomery9488 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Steve makes and engine that takes all the pistons to the moon. Great video Steve. Can't wait to see the wagon back in action.

  • @Cadwerx1
    @Cadwerx1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you Steve, I am leaning towards perosity for sure, you can see the pin holes in the rod by the piston that you showed us. I could be wrong but would make the most sense with aluminum. Thank you again for your info. this series is fantastic working thru this. Everyone have a great day!!!

  • @Meenie66
    @Meenie66 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The amount the first piston was squashed was very impressive. Great to see minimal damage to the motor overall considering what happened!

  • @BigRob345
    @BigRob345 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I just started watching your channel, and some awesome content thus far. The minimal damage to that engine for the rods exploding is amazing

  • @shoptourhardcoredragracing1840
    @shoptourhardcoredragracing1840 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Steve , I love the work that you do !
    I have been watching you for years and some day I'm going to own my own SMX. These rods look Die-Cast aluminum . I suggest you get a batch of those rods and yours and have X-Ray's done on them to compare them . Billet rods should stretch not shatter . Try putting one in a press and see if it bends or breaks.

    • @CreeperOnYourHouse
      @CreeperOnYourHouse 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fatigue failures do crack, however. At 45 pounds of boost, 6 runs of repetition...

    • @davidmiller9485
      @davidmiller9485 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CreeperOnYourHouse I still think the grains weren't as tight as they should have been for billet. Bad aluminum will cause these problems.

    • @SkypowerwithKarl
      @SkypowerwithKarl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No, they were definitely billet. Probably 7075 T6 and the anodizing was lightning the fuse.

    • @mikehoncho5389
      @mikehoncho5389 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don’t think you’d see grain structure with an X-ray. Better to just examine the grain structure Uber a microscope.

    • @SkypowerwithKarl
      @SkypowerwithKarl 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mikehoncho5389
      Yup. A lot of the time you can see the grain with the naked eye. You etch, stain and observe under magnification.

  • @minibikemadman
    @minibikemadman 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Giveaways paying for rebuilds..way better than selling dirt...I received my hat and I must say its the best quality ever. I will be ordering more stuff soon! Thanks steve

  • @timstrauch125
    @timstrauch125 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    DAMN the “keyboard warrior” haters!
    Your videos are the most informative I’ve seen.
    As a mechanical engineer/amateur engine builder myself, I know “Stuff” happens!
    Keep up the great work!

  • @rongoca5
    @rongoca5 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    A friend of mine worked for Alcoa In Tennessee he said he seen high number aluminum such as 7061 or greater shatter right after a pour.He said it came from the mix of stuff added to the aluminum made super brittle and slightly cooling shattered it like tempered glass

    • @inactive67
      @inactive67 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The way those rods blew out that seems damn probalbe.

  • @passinggear
    @passinggear 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Dude....you have wood valve cover and intake??? Everybody knows that caused mass rod exodus....they hate oak......

  • @nicolelongneckergallery
    @nicolelongneckergallery 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Steve, I’ve been around the block more than a few times, but your videos are so illustrative and educational I have learned more and more. Thank you for taking time to produce these. Look forward to each on. Stay well.

  • @jeffstevens9849
    @jeffstevens9849 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You being a master engine builder, and seller of hundreds of high performance engines that have been proven over the years, this is an amazing technical show of how wonderful your engines are. A lot of people would have tried to hide a catastrophe like this being a well-known engine builder. What I see is every rod broke in the same spot, and you said these were unproven rods for this type of high performance build. It's amazing I've never seen an engine blow 8 rods and not totally destroy the block and lifters and valve train. Love your technical videos would love to see the build on the land speed car. Keep up the good work.

  • @8ballphilc
    @8ballphilc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love your willingness to take the time to share this with us! Much appreciated! Seems pretty logical that this involved some rod material that was not what it was supposed to be.

  • @jasonH5997
    @jasonH5997 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I feel like it was definitely material failure, by the looks of the grain in the metal on a few of the rods still connected ţo the pistons.

  • @fentonpainter5275
    @fentonpainter5275 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Uncle Tony's Garage (TH-cam) commented that in the early 90's When motors were going from wet sump to dry sump these types of failures were common, and it was found to be a resonance that the wet sump oiling tended to suppress. Some Pro-stock history lessons may reveal causes.

    • @bkrgi
      @bkrgi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      UTG made the most sense out of all the comments to explain why it all went south at once. It is amazing how resonance can all of a sudden cause interest things to happen. Hit that sweet spot and in this case boom on a impressive scale.

    • @merr6267
      @merr6267 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Saw that too . . . Though I think he was referencing the top fuel engines. Fascinating stuff all around.

  • @ericb9328
    @ericb9328 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Awesome video as always! I’m curious to see how the metallurgy comes back but it 100% is a material issue

  • @B-Nazty
    @B-Nazty 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Don’t listen to the haters man. Those rods didn’t just break, they disintegrated! You clearly found the breaking point of those rods lol. Big ups for not just trashing the manufacturer and explaining to the haters how good your work clearly is. Keep up the great videos!

  • @eriksmith5950
    @eriksmith5950 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love the knowledge you have and the thinking! I am a Building General Contractor and always try to think out side the box every time I build something and how points are going to be loaded and needing points to load them. Love the videos and keep them up! P.S. also a gear head!

  • @advorsky1
    @advorsky1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Man I’m impressed with how little damage has been to the cylinder heads and the crank and the cam…….truly a robust piece! What about harmonics causing all of the rods to fail? Obviously there was a metallurgy issue with the material the rods were made from or heat treat something……..

    • @MadmanJnr
      @MadmanJnr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Pretty amazing isn't it. Considering the rods just disintegrated... everything else looks fantastic Considering.

    • @jenniferaby442
      @jenniferaby442 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree , a resonate frequency MAY have cause cleavage along crystalline faces of the metals grain structure.

  • @c103110a
    @c103110a 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I noticed that the rods were "black" colored and not natural aluminum colored when you installed them. Could the Anodyzing process have done something to the material surface to weaken it??? e.g. eating into the suface and introducing micro cracks????

    • @kasuraga
      @kasuraga 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Anodizing shouldn't do anything like that to the metal. Since all it's doing is dying the oxide layer that naturally forms. I think some forms of anodizing hardens the outer layer but it shouldn't cause anything like this due to how thin the layer is

  • @v12alpine
    @v12alpine 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Uncle Tony has a interesting theory about harmonics. Used to be a big issue with aluminim rods back in the day. Either way, those things were no good.

    • @St0RM33
      @St0RM33 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      link?

  • @murmur3966
    @murmur3966 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Right on big guy. I like using numbers to solve problems, but I love it when numbers are used to show something is impossible. The main reason I watch your channel is because I learn something every time. Keep on building those beautiful beastly motors and sharing it with all of us. The moment I saw the grainy shards of steel, I recognized that problem from a blade forging show I watched and the steel wasn't annealed properly, so the blade shattered like your rods. I was really happy to see how many expensive parts you will be able to salvage from your blown motor. Rebuild her bigger and badder than before.

  • @basicguy1961
    @basicguy1961 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    it really hurts some people's feelings when you can show them the math and explain why things could not happen. Great Job Steve keep up the good work. a long time following. My stepdad that raced late model stuff always talked about getting a Stev Morris Engine But Cancer took him away before he ever could.

  • @AntiPattern328
    @AntiPattern328 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I'm going with the temper of the rod somehow matched the harmonics/frequency in the engine at that particular point and cracked like a wine glass with high pitches. I can't remember what those rods looked like or if they were narrower at the middle or anything but everything vibrates and if you hit the right frequency, you break it. Especially ultra hardened stuff. Maybe the rod maker was using a new hardening process or mix of metal. Thats the only way I can see all those rods breaking at the same position at the same time so I'm going with that!!

    • @rustysausage69
      @rustysausage69 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      my thoughts as well, not being a "bad material" failure. broken at the same time, the same fashion at the same place with remarkable consistency. material inconsistency would break in that exact fashion, inconsistently.

    • @m.s.r.makeshitrun2076
      @m.s.r.makeshitrun2076 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's was my first assumption when they all break the same way at the and time.

  • @crapshoot5264
    @crapshoot5264 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Absolutely love the wood grain valve covers and intake to match the panels on the wagon.

  • @68dragracer
    @68dragracer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love the videos Steve! I would be crying pulling this apart, you are just cool as always and use it as a teaching experience. Love it!

  • @bartman3608
    @bartman3608 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im with you Steve. Im 57 and own a repair shop. It just feels great to teach the dying art.

  • @Hick3rbillys
    @Hick3rbillys 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Props to Steve, Genuinely a true testament to the quality of your engines/design, the fact that all that stuff/material was inside the motor at 8500RPM and the block, heads and crank/cam are mostly salvageable?! Very impressive.

  • @FlightEngineering1
    @FlightEngineering1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I`ve had a few rod failures on Merlin aircraft engines. I noticed that if they fail down near the big end, the crankcase is ok, if they fail near the top end, then they window the case. Just an observation. Thanks for sharing everything Steve!

  • @richardpenner4686
    @richardpenner4686 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video...you are lucky...you still have some good parts to put this motor back together...thanks for sharing...

  • @tobynevitte554
    @tobynevitte554 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The manufacturers material specification and heat treatment of the connecting rods would be worth identifying and performing tests to determine acceptance to those specs.
    Glad it’s not too damaged and can hopefully be salvaged.
    Thanks for sharing

  • @mt375hp
    @mt375hp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The amount of knowledge you possess and share is amazing. Thank You.

  • @gteefxr3094
    @gteefxr3094 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video and analysis. Thanks for taking the time.

  • @douglasmayherjr.5733
    @douglasmayherjr.5733 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome Video. I wish our schools had more teachers like you to teach mechanics and critical thinking. The way you broke everything down and explained each aspect was great. The fracture lines on the rods don’t look good, a metallurgist will be able to figure everything out. Hopefully it was only one bad set of rods from that vendor or they can track down any other customers before they have a failure. I also hope your block and crank are salvageable. Thanks for sharing your time and knowledge. You remind me of Gale Banks in your explanation and willingness to educate people.

  • @gerrypaulson9917
    @gerrypaulson9917 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I haven't read any of the comments but by just what you say it's amazing to me that people think they no more than you and think that they know what happened and that you made some kind of error. I don't see anyone else designing, machining and doing what you are doing.. you were at the top of the game and to that I say God bless you and we love your videos. PS I don't think you have to explain yourself to anybody

  • @garyhopkins6337
    @garyhopkins6337 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great show Steve, I'm sure you will sort out what exactly went wrong, and as far as all the lounge chair experts with ideas of what went wrong that gets better with every beer don't let it get to you. cheers, Gary. Western Australia.

  • @richardsink9198
    @richardsink9198 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I still think the Aluminum was poured or the recipe for the aluminum alloy was messed up by the Aluminum manufacturer. But once again, what do I know? I still do not believe the people who machined the rods are at fault. they got a bad batch of aluminum. Perhaps they should test each batch however. Great Video Steve.

  • @ronthepoolstudent
    @ronthepoolstudent 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My last break was a single connecting rod. It was only 7k to get my n/a Dart 568 back to the dyno. 😊
    Btw Steve, I’m a Grand Rapids/Rockford gear header since 1977, been following your progress and wanted to say thanks for taking the time to share man 👍🏻👍🏻

  • @grahamwells4223
    @grahamwells4223 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Steve, we learn more from failures and mistakes than anything else. But it takes brave and humble people like yourself to share these experiences in such detail that allow us to learn so much!
    You are not just a brilliant engine builder, you are also a First class teacher who shares his knowledge in such a way that we can all understand what you are talking about and what is going on.
    Please keep up the good work and keep the videos coming, as I'm always looking for the next one. Hence I've subscribed and shared your work!👍😎

  • @bradyhood4786
    @bradyhood4786 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You sir are a legend showing all the info and breaking it down for every one to learn and get there gears turning and learning

  • @davidlogalbo1756
    @davidlogalbo1756 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love love love your videos! I always learn something when watching your videos. Keep em coming!

  • @MiddMike99
    @MiddMike99 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing attitude!!! Truly an inspiration!!!! Love the videos keep them coming!!!

  • @JaredUnashamed
    @JaredUnashamed ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm not a gear head. I love cars and I love watching and learning about stuff like this. Great job on explaining it all.

  • @eriktyvoll8148
    @eriktyvoll8148 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have been watching for a while and your explanations for this are thorough but understandable! The amount of carnage and minimal destruction to the parts is amazing engineering at work!

  • @chuckward8650
    @chuckward8650 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Unfortunately you can search and search. I believe that the answer is an the rod manufacturing. I've been in this trade for 45 years. Seen all types of failures both coincidentally and deliberate. Never have I seen eight rods come apart at one time. I'm thinking when the tests come back you'll have your answers. Thank you for all you do Steve. You keep the camera on and I'll keep watching

  • @brandibean2770
    @brandibean2770 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the in depth you go to in the videos

  • @ralphsajkowski9002
    @ralphsajkowski9002 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just the best videos with in depth description!

  • @bdjm8595
    @bdjm8595 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks so much Steve for sharing this with us!!! People, take your hands off your keyboards and learn from this man!!!

  • @jarikooper6325
    @jarikooper6325 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I really love this type of videos. These videos are really educating. I learn a lot about engines and how they work with this type of videos.