Idee is dat je het water gebruikt lijkt mij. Legionella is geloof ik een bacterie die van lauw stilstaand water houdt om zich te ontwikkelen. Veteranen ziekte loop je op als de legionella bacterie in je longen komt. Dat gebeurt als je in contact komt met verneveld water / waterdamp - denk aan een douche. Boven de 55 graden sterft de legionella bacterie. De ondergrens van temperatuur om tot ontwikkeling te komen weet ik niet, maar zal wel een comfortable 15 a 20 graden zijn. Prima lijkt mij dit daarom voor gebruik in de tuin en niet voor menselijke consumptie. Denk dat een opslag ondergronds beter is grote hoeveelheden want dan is de temperatuur altijd rond de 10 a 12 graden.
Bacteria, unlike viruses, are living organisms. However, like viruses, bacteria are erroneously accused of being pathogens. It first became possible to observe microorganisms when Antonie van Leeuwenhoek invented his powerful microscope in 1676; however, as discussed, his study of these tiny entities did not involve an investigation of their possible connection with diseases. The first ‘germ theory of disease’ was proposed by Dr. Plenciz in 1762, but it was not until the 19th century that the Italian entomologist, Agostino Bassi performed experiments that are alleged to be the first to provide ‘proof’ for the theory. His initial investigations were in connection with a silkworm disease; it is claimed that he discovered the cause of this disease to be a microscopic fungus. This study led to further investigations, the result of which was that in 1844 he proposed the theory that human diseases were also caused by microorganisms; his theory therefore precedes that of Louis Pasteur. During the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries, many diseases were rife throughout Europe; these diseases include typhus, cholera, tuberculosis and smallpox. It is claimed that smallpox alone was responsible for nearly half a million deaths each year during the 18th century. It was during this period that treatments for these diseases involved the use of measures that were described by William White as ‘a combination of absurdity with nastiness’. It must be noted that the insanitary conditions that existed in many of the towns and cities in England were also prevalent in many of the towns and cities throughout Europe. However, this was also the period in which ‘science’ began its meteoric rise. The Scientific Revolution, which is said to have begun in the middle of the 16th century, saw many significant discoveries and inventions that overturned long-held ideas and beliefs about the world and how it worked. Unfortunately, scientific investigations in the field of ‘medicine’ did not succeed in overturning the old belief that disease was the result of an attack by external entities. Instead, this basic assumption was retained and appeared to be supported by the discovery of microorganisms; a discovery that exerted, and continues to exert, a powerful influence on the direction of medical research. However, appearances can often be deceptive; a maxim that has proven to be entirely applicable to bacteria. Although Louis Pasteur is regarded as the father of the germ theory, it is Dr. Robert Koch who is regarded as the founder of modern bacteriology; nevertheless, like Louis Pasteur, Dr Koch is falsely venerated as a hero. It is widely claimed that Dr. Koch provided the necessary ‘proof’ that certain diseases were caused by certain bacteria; but this is a mistaken claim, as will be demonstrated. In order for him to test his theory that bacteria were the causes of disease, Dr. Koch developed four Postulates that continue to bear his name. The first Postulate, which is the most crucial for determining a causal agent of disease, comprises two criteria, the first of which is that the microbe alleged to cause a specific disease must be found in all people suffering from that disease. The second criterion is that the microbe should not be found in anyone who does not have the disease it is claimed to cause. The logic of this first postulate is undeniable; any exception to either criterion means that the ‘microbe’ could not be the causal agent of the disease in question. This logic is recognized by Dr. Peter Duesberg, who states in his book entitled Inventing the AIDS Virus that, “A single exception would be enough to pronounce the microbe innocent of creating that disease.” However, investigations of bacteria and their relationship to different diseases reveal the existence of exceptions to both criteria of Koch’s first postulate; bacteria have been found in the bodies of people who do not have the disease they are alleged to cause, and the relevant bacteria have not been found in all people with the disease they are alleged to cause. The significance of these exceptions is that they utterly refute the basic assumption that bacteria cause disease. These exceptions should have persuaded scientists like Dr Koch to reassess the ‘germ theory’, if not completely abandon it. There was, and still is, a great reluctance to abandon or even reassess the theory; instead, efforts have been made to solve the anomalies raised by these exceptions by making adaptations to the theory. But these adaptations do not resolve the underlying anomalies; on the contrary, they introduce additional anomalies. The main problem is that the adapted theory retains the underlying assumption that ‘bacteria’ are pathogens; but it is precisely this assumption that is fundamentally flawed.
![[Full Episode] The Restaurant War Thailand ศึกพ่อค้าซ่าแม่ค้าแซ่บ Episode 4 | 13 ต.ค. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/h8N9tY46P-M/mqdefault.jpg)
Wat een negatieve reacties ! Hebben we nog wel door waar het om draait ?
Wordt lekker warm in de zon, fijn voor de legionella
Idee is dat je het water gebruikt lijkt mij.
Legionella is geloof ik een bacterie die van lauw stilstaand water houdt om zich te ontwikkelen.
Veteranen ziekte loop je op als de legionella bacterie in je longen komt.
Dat gebeurt als je in contact komt met verneveld water / waterdamp - denk aan een douche.
Boven de 55 graden sterft de legionella bacterie.
De ondergrens van temperatuur om tot ontwikkeling te komen weet ik niet, maar zal wel een comfortable 15 a 20 graden zijn.
Prima lijkt mij dit daarom voor gebruik in de tuin en niet voor menselijke consumptie. Denk dat een opslag ondergronds beter is grote hoeveelheden want dan is de temperatuur altijd rond de 10 a 12 graden.
Bacteria, unlike viruses, are living organisms.
However, like viruses, bacteria are erroneously accused of being pathogens.
It first became possible to observe microorganisms when Antonie van Leeuwenhoek invented his powerful microscope in 1676; however, as discussed, his study of these tiny entities did not involve an investigation of their possible connection with diseases.
The first ‘germ theory of disease’ was proposed by Dr. Plenciz in 1762, but it was not until the 19th century that the Italian entomologist, Agostino Bassi performed experiments that are alleged to be the first to provide ‘proof’ for the theory. His initial investigations were in connection with a silkworm disease; it is claimed that he discovered the cause of this disease to be a microscopic fungus. This study led to further investigations, the result of which was that in 1844 he proposed the theory that human diseases were also caused by microorganisms; his theory therefore precedes that of Louis Pasteur.
During the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries, many diseases were rife throughout Europe; these diseases include typhus, cholera, tuberculosis and smallpox. It is claimed that smallpox alone was responsible for nearly half a million deaths each year during the 18th century. It was during this period that treatments for these diseases involved the use of measures that were described by William White as ‘a combination of absurdity with nastiness’. It must be noted that the insanitary conditions that existed in many of the towns and cities in England were also prevalent in many of the towns and cities throughout Europe.
However, this was also the period in which ‘science’ began its meteoric rise. The Scientific Revolution, which is said to have begun in the middle of the 16th century, saw many significant discoveries and inventions that overturned long-held ideas and beliefs about the world and how it worked.
Unfortunately, scientific investigations in the field of ‘medicine’ did not succeed in overturning the old belief that disease was the result of an attack by external entities. Instead, this basic assumption was retained and appeared to be supported by the discovery of microorganisms; a discovery that exerted, and continues to exert, a powerful influence on the direction of medical research. However, appearances can often be deceptive; a maxim that has proven to be entirely applicable to bacteria.
Although Louis Pasteur is regarded as the father of the germ theory, it is Dr. Robert Koch who is regarded as the founder of modern bacteriology; nevertheless, like Louis Pasteur, Dr Koch is falsely venerated as a hero. It is widely claimed that Dr. Koch provided the necessary ‘proof’ that certain diseases were caused by certain bacteria; but this is a mistaken claim, as will be demonstrated.
In order for him to test his theory that bacteria were the causes of disease, Dr. Koch developed four Postulates that continue to bear his name. The first Postulate, which is the most crucial for determining a causal agent of disease, comprises two criteria, the first of which is that the microbe alleged to cause a specific disease must be found in all people suffering from that disease. The second criterion is that the microbe should not be found in anyone who does not have the disease it is claimed to cause. The logic of this first postulate is undeniable; any exception to either criterion means that the ‘microbe’ could not be the causal agent of the disease in question. This logic is recognized by Dr. Peter Duesberg, who states in his book entitled Inventing the AIDS Virus that,
“A single exception would be enough to pronounce the microbe innocent of creating that disease.”
However, investigations of bacteria and their relationship to different diseases reveal the existence of exceptions to both criteria of Koch’s first postulate; bacteria have been found in the bodies of people who do not have the disease they are alleged to cause, and the relevant bacteria have not been found in all people with the disease they are alleged to cause. The significance of these exceptions is that they utterly refute the basic assumption that bacteria cause disease. These exceptions should have persuaded scientists like Dr Koch to reassess the ‘germ theory’, if not completely abandon it.
There was, and still is, a great reluctance to abandon or even reassess the theory; instead, efforts have been made to solve the anomalies raised by these exceptions by making adaptations to the theory. But these adaptations do not resolve the underlying anomalies; on the contrary, they introduce additional anomalies. The main problem is that the adapted theory retains the underlying assumption that ‘bacteria’ are pathogens; but it is precisely this assumption that is fundamentally flawed.
En je buren hebben ook ineens een rainwinner.
@@Benjorunner Gewoon een aftapkraantje erin zetten en een gietertje eronder klaar.
De rainwinner zet het zaakje gelijk op druk en stuurt 't naar de wasmachine
Haha, inderdaad. Pomp overbodig
Berlijnse muur in je tuin ....