Upgrading the Particle Physics Toolkit: The Future Circular Collider - Harry Cliff, John Womersley
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 เม.ย. 2019
- When the LHC reaches the limits of its discovery potential in 2035, what happens next? John Womersley and Harry Cliff discuss the next mega-collider - the future circular collider.
Subscribe for regular science videos: bit.ly/RiSubscRibe
The 'Future Circular Collider' (FCC) is a plan for a 100km ring-shaped particle accelerator buried underground near Geneva, which would dwarf the Large Hadron Collider in power, reaching collision energies of up to 100 TeV. This formidable machine would allow physicists to seek answers to some of the deepest questions about our universe including the nature of dark matter, the imbalance between matter and antimatter in the universe, and whether a deeper theory lies beneath the current Standard Model of particle physics.
Watch the Q&A: • Q&A: Upgrading the Par...
Dr Harry Cliff is a particle physicist based at the University of Cambridge who works on the LHCb experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. Harry’s research is focused on searching for signs of new particles and forces beyond the Standard Model of particle physics by studying the decays of particles known as bottom quarks. For the past seven years he has held a joint fellowship with the Science Museum, where he curated exhibitions on physics and astronomy including a major exhibition about the Large Hadron Collider.
Professor John Womersley is one of the world’s foremost particle physicists and has taken leading roles on projects both in Europe and the United States. John worked at Fermilab near Chicago before becoming a scientific advisor to the Department of Energy in the US. He returned to the UK in 2005 to become Director of the Particle Physics Department at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory at a time when it was building and delivering vital components to CERN's Large Hadron Collider. In time John took on a broader role as Director of the Science Programmes Office and was then appointed Chief Executive of the Science and Technology Facilities Council in 2011. He is now the Director General of Europe’s next major science project, the European Spallation Source.
These talks and Q&A were recorded and live streamed in the Ri on 7 March 2019.
You can watch the unedited live stream version here: • LIVE STREAM: The Next ...
---
A very special thank you to our Patreon supporters who help make these videos happen, especially:
Dave Ostler, David Lindo, Greg Nagel, Ivan Korolev, John Pollock, Lester Su, Osian Gwyn Williams, Radu Tizu, Rebecca Pan, Robert Hillier, Roger Baker, Sergei Solovev, and Will Knott
---
The Ri is on Patreon: / theroyalinsti. .
and Twitter: / ri_science
and Facebook: / royalinstitution
and Tumblr: / ri-science
Our editorial policy: www.rigb.org/home/editorial-po...
Subscribe for the latest science videos: bit.ly/RiNewsletter - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Hi everyone, lots of you have asked us over the years for an update of what's going at the LHC, Cern and particle physics in general these days, so we invited Helen Czerski, Harry Cliff and John Womersley to talk about the new proposed circular collider. We actually even live streamed the talk as it was happening so if you're experiencing déjà vu, that's probably why! th-cam.com/video/rSDE9E_J4-w/w-d-xo.html
It seems to me that its very hard to argue for spending such vast sums on this one area of high-energy particle research when there is not really a theoretical basis to set out what a new collider would be looking for. At least the LHC had a target (the Higgs), with a theoretical energy window to narrow the search. Right now theoretical physics appears to be virtually at a stand. Aside from the Higgs the LHC has failed to uncover evidence of any new particle in the energy range of its operation. I for one would not wish to support the building of a new accelerator with no theoretical basis whatsoever. Surely there are better ways to spend the money on other more promising research fields until the theorists come up with a testable model.
@@JustFamilyPlaytime My take-away from the first half of the presentation was that we'd be seeking to explore how the Higgs might possibly be interacting with dark matter. Which, as I understood, would be the first part of the research conducted with the proposed electron/positron collider.
Sorry I didn't mean to derail your plans😆
Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:
When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. (More spatial curvature). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are actually a part of the quarks. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" make sense based on this concept. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons.
Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons.
Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron.
Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves.
@LAIAN KONTSE q1
Harry Cliff is probably my favorite. The way he goes down to detail is incredible. His explanation and narrative is almost perfect.
He's a very effective speaker. Many of the others found on this channel just spew random gibberish.
yes really simple plain english.
I rather like that he spoke directly and quick paced, i prefer my information a b c styled without sugar coating or drawn out bullshit to annoy and distract me. I found this to be succinct and informative. The speakers both to be competent and the last to be succinct as he push out a ton of info.
I want to see you sit through a Trump rally :)
Im not a politician.
Rather useless info nonetheless, because nothing is going to come out of this machine that they are building. You'll see
@@isaid1218 you're a very boring induvidual sorry mate
@@MessiahNerves Probably a "religious" one.
In my own way, I also worked on the Superconducting Super Collider - Houses were removed from over the top of the track of the SSC; some of them were bulldozed, but some were picked up and moved to another place - I helped repair them so they could be inhabited again.
I also knew an engineer who worked on it - he concurred that it was quite a mess.
Me too. But after it was closed down. I measured the magnetic field density of the YBCO magnets which were created at The Institute for Beam Particle Dynamics at University of Houston. These were originally intended to be used in the SSC.
Lady in the front row decided to stay home and nap for this lecture.
She is asking herself why we need the measurement of higgs boson one decimal deeper. How much energy is enough? Maybe a new approach might bring something useful to humanity from the research itself not just from all the problems solved to make the tool, then the tool bigger. Seems there is evidence that shows we have more urgent things to do than nurture the need for speed particle mafia.
Man.. I love these lectures. Thank you #The_Royal_Institution for such amazing content. I wish to attend one in future. Love from India.
To be honest, this is one of the best talks I've heared yet. This also inspired me to do a presentation in class and it insprired me to learn more about elementary particles! THX for providing this!
The most startling discovery from this talk: A young Simon Clark in the front row.
This stuff is so exciting. Like everyone, I have my ups and downs but learning about the secrets of the universe in itself makes life worth living.
Psa 14:1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psa 14:2 The LORD looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, and seek God.
Deu 4:29 But if from thence thou shalt seek the LORD thy God, thou shalt find him, if thou seek him with all thy heart and with all thy soul.
I love the way Harry Cliff explains complex science.. ! Great work !
Project design, management and execution is overwhelmingly complex for something of this magnitude. This was a an incredibly detailed presentation of a well thought out plan by an incredibly competent and experience person. Wow.
A very interesting session, I have a question that has been puzzling me since your 2017 talk. How does this all relate to Quantum Mechanics super positioning?
Great clear layman's description
MY-GOD, WHAT A GREAT FOR JOHN W. Great speech, points and everything.
LETS BUILD IT!! NO QUESTIONS ASKED!!
FOR THE LOVE OF HUMANITY PLEASE BUILD THIS
Absolutely fascinating
Thanks
love the voice and the fire in the words that are said. well done!. btw nice beard
Thanks Ri
After you plug in the Higgs there are 3 empty spaces which would make it a Perfect rectangle. Add dark energy particle, dark matter particle and graviton particle. Nice and tidy. Boom done.
Pretentious Bear I didn’t say it was or wasn’t. That comment has nothing to do with my post lol
Hey. Some weird theory about the letters they should be labeled?
I understand that China is also thinking about moving un this direction. I there any collaboration here or would this be a competitive situation?
China is not a country I would trust ever again.
This is food and pleasure for my intellect. Thank you for sharing.
Maybe The Boring Company could bring breakthroughs in tunneling technology and bring down the overall cost for building the new collider.
A great source of escape from sleepless nights for the curious with ear buds.
Since particles are to be to be understood as blips in fields which exist throughout the universe, does this lead to a theory regarding the existence of quantum entanglement?
Thank you for this!!
I want to know more about l h c experiment
We need a particle collider in outer space.
You might enjoy this thought experiment - th-cam.com/video/8_zzw4tSOe8/w-d-xo.html
i wonder what volunteer projects and donation groups could do to those numbers.
He meant 52:20 "gateway drug", not entry drug.
Higgs field due to mass tends towards energy speed of light tends towards १m/s
"is the LHC clapped out' what a start haha
Where’s the desk?
When I first saw this I thought this was strange but now after watching it again and not getting to worked up about spooky action entanglement mechanics it’s really brilliant and insightful. It seems to be saying basically that we expect to much by thinking everything is classical and can easily give granularity detail. Kind of like a classic mode. But quantum mechanics is showing randomness which may require more and more inquiries which are hidden in wave like entrapment. Which require more questions to see the history of the particle as it was, but never predict any small particle as it will be. So this is more of a detective kind of process. To find out who did it or where they went. But not tell where they will go. As if the universe programs in wave like randomness or encoded secret cryptography. Splitting up things randomly and you can’t tell the key and meaning until you read all the different views, the different encoded messages and go through the orcesss to decode the message. It’s like a mystical actual quantum encode process is built into the nature of the universe. And we will never understand these things like little particles. Because the mixed wave nature and uncertainty are just a part of the universe encoding this to keep it hidden from us until we finally query what was put in it. As many outcomes are available from super positions. It seems to me that super positions are a kind of encode of quantum tricks which nature is playing on us. To put randomness and unpredictability into the universe. That randomness baffles those who want a simple Newtonian cause and effect. Simple classical physics seems to say well you can know and calculate and predict ahead of time. But quorum universe entanglement and uncertainty gives a sense of randomness which makes it appear that classical approaches will never work alone here. That’s just the nature of the universe. So a built in uncertainty of anything but the statistical randomness of the various outcomes can be predicted. Things like wave variations are not simple wave functions but complex and baffling. The hope for physics to explain all, outcomes sigh determinism meats it’s match and cannot win. Because random entanglement an games of chance are written into the way the quantum universe works. This means the quantum label is a kind of misnomer in my opinion. Because we think more bits and more deeper understanding of simp,e bits can predict where one but will take one path. But wave entanglement is a random encode which defeats this. The way I look at this is an entangled quantum encryption is happening by the universe in a sense. Like the universe performing an encryption game which classical goals will never crack. You can only read from many parts the results, but never predict the message. The encode is almost spooky and alive in a sense. And it’s random enough that you can’t predict it. Anyway this is what I got out of this. But maybe I wrote this to quickly to make this clearly described.
The spookiness is it appears that comp,Edith of encryption is decided faster than the speed of light. And it’s not really known if a quit was encoded or a second decide unless you are at both reliever sites. So it doesn’t break the speed of light it merely keeps the information of the complexity hidden by constraints of a complex decode process which can’t be done from one remote location,
We are on the cusp of major practical discoveries AI, super conductors, quantum computers, carbon nano tubes, the list goes on and on..... and on these things will change the entire world in thousands of ways maybe we should give this 50 billion to those projects so that the next collider we build could benefit from all those amazing (useful) technologies.
The LHC was built for the purpose of finding something that's existence had been predicted and theorized many years ago. The issue that will cause building a larger and more powerful particle collider difficult is that unlike the LHC there isn't another specifically predicted particle that is being hunted. There may be particles waiting to be discovered but we would just kinda be fondling about in the dark hoping to find something.
He literally specified discovering WIMP's in the talk you just watched.
@@aidanlevy2841
WIMP's aren't predicted in the standard model. You're not understanding what I'm saying. WIMP's may be a way of explaining cold dark matter. I don't believe that you're grasping the implications of my comment. What I said is actually just me repeating what most theoretical and particle physicists are already hypothesizing.
@@aidanlevy2841
The Higgs field was mathematically proven and we knew it existed. The LHC was built in large part to find it because we were convinced it was there. Dark matter is really the way physicists describe a phenomenon that we dont understand and can't really explain, unlike the Higgs field. So the LHC was built because we were convinced we would find the Higgs. Dark matter could very well be completely nonexistent and the expanding universe could be caused by something else. Dark Matter is really just a best guess and a stand in for observation that we can't explain. The Higgs field was essentially proven before we actually discovered it through calculations and logical conclusions. Dark matter, including WIMP's are not like looking for the Higgs. It's much more speculative. There are smart people who think dark matter may explain the perplexing phenomena that we observe but building a stronger particle accelerator may be futile.
Except from the fact that we can study experimentally how the Higgs interacts with all other SM particles and understand its potential. Going to precisions below 1% will allow to probe its quantum nature.
@@TheVaronos24
We dont know that. That's a prediction and a very broad one at that.
😍😍😍😍
😍 😍
😍 😍 😍
😍😍😍
😍 😍 😍
😍 😍 😍
😍 😍 😍
thats some heavy pixelation? id map that in 3D :)
Knowledge is better than love and it's only getting better.
I understand that the collider cannot raise particles to the speed of light. It can get them close but not at C. Why not have two rings? The first accelerating particles clockwise and the second accelerating them anti-clockwise, giving a collision speed of slightly less than two C?
Thats exactly what is already happening. The particles are actually in the same tube but their path is controlled by the EM fields such that they don't collide at random spots. But since the particles are at relativistic speeds you can't simply add their velocities in a galilean fashion. You need special relativity which doesn't allow anything faster than c.
@@andrin1248 The photons leaving your living room light bulb in opposite directions are traveling at 2C relative to each other. If SR says they are not, then it is obviously wrong.
@@zendan37 Yes but only in our reference frame, not in theirs. But anyway, they are already traveling near c in the opposite direction before smashing into each other. In our reference with a relative speed of a little under 2c, but in their frame a little closer to c. This is not a new idea. It would actually be difficult if one of the particles is still, because the collision won't happen stationary anymore. Everything gets shot into one direction, and the cameras wouldn't capture it.
@@zendan37 completely wrong. photons are traveling at speed of light not matter what reference frame, this is special relativity and tested completely. Also, there are 2 separate rings in the same tunnel going opposite directions.
@@dft1 Surely two photons, each travelling at C towards each other in those rings, are approaching each other at a speed of 2C. That's common sense no matter what the maths says.
For people discussing how fast the speaker is this is something they have started doing on TH-cam and that is they are physically speeding up the speech in the films. Sometimes to fit in a whole lecture in a smaller amount of time but it can be difficult to hear at the rate of speed the lectures are then given to us. I think it’s terrible they speed them up so fast. However, I do not think they speeded this up nor removed pauses. This seems normal to me.
I just wanted to say that again I wish that TH-cam would not put up any film without a date in the heading. It’s crazy that we have to try to find when a film was released to the public. Since they already go to the trouble of putting the title for that lecture, and sometimes the main speakers, how much harder would it be to date these films?
We've never sped anyone up or slowed anyone down, Harry just speaks quite fast.
And in terms of dates, you can see when a video was published at the top of the video description. Right under "The Royal Institution" it says "Published on 10 April 2019".
We also let you know when the talk was filmed in the description of the video, for this one "These talks and Q&A were recorded and live streamed in the Ri on 7 March 2019."
I don't understand how a bigger collider means the particles have more energy, is not the energy held by a particle just a function of the particle's mass and its velocity and the LHC is already accelerating them to 99.9999991% of the speed of light, is it simply getting them a few more of those last 3 m/s closer to the speed of light? Anyone able to fill me in?
Its all special relativity. As you get closer to the speed of light, it gets harder and harder to get closer. Thus more and more energy is needed for tiny changes in velocity. So despite the velocity barely changing, the energy can change significantly. the formula is E proportional to 1/sq(1-v2/c2)
Why?
What happened to that super old wooden desk?
We wheel it in and out on tiny wheels.
The problem is that we have no expectation of new physics from that next hadron collider. 1) Theorists are losing confidence in WIMPs as dark matter candidates. 2) There are serious arguments against DM being required to explain galactic rotation curves--which is why it was originally proposed. So it may not exist at all! That graphic of the DM halo around a spiral galaxy? All standard DM stuff, and quite possibly wrong. See astrophysicist and cosmologist Stacy McGaugh on the topic at tritonstation.wordpress.com/category/dark-matter/
I've nothing against high-precision studies of Higgs properties, and it may be that the largest portion of the cost of a next-gen CERN hadron collider would be the tunnel required for that electron-positron collider precursor. In which case it might be a reasonable idea. But other proposals (non-CERN) have been bandied about for precision studies, such as a linear accelerator, which wouldn't have the synchrotron radiation problem.
I have little confidence in new physics from a hadron collider we can actually build. We have no compelling theoretical reason to expect new physics until Plank energies are reached. Which is _15 orders of magnitude_ higher than the LHC! Going from 13 TeV to 100 TeV is unimpressive if what's needed is an increase of one million billion.
If you want new physics/cosmology, spend those Euro on a second 40 meter class telescope for the European Southern Observatory -- or try to go even larger. The Extremely Large Telescope will by far be the largest in the world, and much cheaper than another hadron collider.
@V Soul Dude, honestly, if you have even the slightest inkling about the physics behind particle accelerators, you’d realize that the doomsday crap about them is just scare mongering for views in pop media.
The whole idea behind it is that if you hit an immoveable object with an unstoppable force, you create a black hole, which is seen as a boogeyman in pop science.
1.) That’s a hypothetical thought experiment, particles are neither immovable objects nor unstoppable forces. Particle accelerators are certainly the closest we can come to achieving that concept, but in the end, it’s not how particles behave.
2.) It is theoretically possible to make artificial blackholes in particle accelerators, however it’s more predictable than these dumb articles make it sound. The amount of mass and energy to potentially make one is calculable, and Cern, nor really anything planned, can really cut it.
3.) Even if you did somehow make a micro black hole inside a particle accelerator... So what? Artificial black holes, if we can even manage to make one, would be incredibly tiny, with unbelievably small Schwarzschild radii... Which means it would have such extreme tidal forces that it wouldn’t affect anything even just an arm’s length away, and it would decay almost immediately as a result of hawking radiation.
... In otherwords, there’s far more pressing matters to get bent out of shape about if your concern is the safety of earth, like the threat of asteroid impacts, global warming, and nuclear proliferation. Why don’t you leave it up to the experts to do the risk assessment on this topic, given they have way more experience
with how particles actually behave than you do. I don’t even have a degree, and even I can explain to you in simple terms why “particle acceleators are doomsday device” arguments are complete BS, simply because it doesn’t take much real research to realize why its pointless fear mongering. Go read up on how particles actually behave, and you’d realize that the chances of one of these things making a dent on earth is basically zero.
“These energies are dangerous”
We have released WAY more energy all at once in nuclear weapon detonations than we probably ever will in a particle accelerators. Particle accelerator energy levels sound scary until you realize that the energy you’re talking about only involves INDIVIDUAL PARTICLES. You’re only dealing with the energies of a handful of particles... As in, single, or maybe double digit numbers of collisions.
Compare that to literally trillions and trillions of plutonium nuclei splitting apart, and trillions and trillions of tritium nuclei fusing together inside of a hydrogen bomb, and suddenly, the amount of energy in a particle acceleator is no big deal.
@The Royal Institution, as mentioned in other comments below: Is Elon Musk's The Boring Company a relevant candidate for boring the FCC's tunnel at a reduced cost?
elons boring company has about average costs for a tunnel of its size of any other company, dont drink the fanboi coolaid.
@Cogniarius Of course. I mentioned them not due to buzz but due to their claimed substantially lower cost per mile.
Where is the very table?
It has little wheels so we probably move to the the ambulatory behind the theatre.
Wtf wheres faradays desk?
It can be wheeled in and out
Is there a Ri-presentation where somebody tells us more about this 'core fusion'-project that gentleman is talking about? (@41:00)
It is ITER (international thermal Experimental Reactor). It focus on nuclear fusion science, you can Google it and get more insights.
Matter: electrons spinning around a nucleus at high speed. Anti-matter: electrons spinning around a nucleus at speeds multiple times higher than matter (making it undetectable). The high speed (high Voltage) collision breaks both atoms, matter and anti-matter, unveiling the truth.
why does it feel like this is a reupload?
We did live stream these talks and the Q&A on 7 March 2019.
You can watch the unedited live stream version here: th-cam.com/video/rSDE9E_J4-w/w-d-xo.html
@@TheRoyalInstitution oh yeah! and i watched them :D now i remember! ty!
There you go, thanks for being a superfan!
I disagree that the costs of tunneling are stable. Elon Musk's "The Boring Company" has been working on ways to greatly reduce the cost of tunneling. They should be consulted for their knowledge and ability to reduce the cost. Because reducing the costs of tunneling will be essential to lowering the overall cost and the resistance to funding it...
I've read somewhere that they are already in contact. I was surprised to hear that statement as well.
May be particle colliding is not the way to go ;) .. Who knows you need a collider as big as the earth's circumference to detect the particles predicted by supersymetry or m-theory ..? ? How do you know the bigger collider will give you better results. It might just get ridiculous after a while. Either your theory is incorrect or you do not know what to look for / where to look for / how to look for particles escaping into hidden dimensions (if they exist).
It’s quite fine, if the research produces transformative spin offs that advance the living standards of everyone. Besides they already found something that seems like the Higgs boson, so they delivered pretty well on the earlier promise. I’m not aware of any specific promises to prove the m-theory correct (or incorrect) with these colliders.
@@chardonnay5767 May be you are right - :)
Bigger colliders are able to find particles of higher mass. That's why it is useful to build larger colliders.
There is no axiom of science that says "If it's hard to find, it's not there."
@@dr.zoidberg8666 I agree. My challenge is how big? I just think it's about time to revisit these exotic theories. I believe herd mentality exists even among scientists.
The Boring Company should do it
@@henrikoldcorn very fair point. Then why does Mr. Musk even bother?
Large Hadron Collider is the modern day Cauldron.
@@HighestRank It's where the scientists cooked up their new particles. Much like where the witch used to cooked their potions.
Amazing presentation in front of a dead public
Not trying to be funny but you must need perfect aim to crash 2 particles that are so small into each other! How does this work?
At the center of the detectors, where you actually collide the particles, you put some superprecise magnets that steer the particles onto each other. You need to manage these magnets carefully, as you don't want to collide when the particles have just entered accelerator and haven't reached the desired speed. But when the particles are at the right speed, you tune these magnets so that the particles collide.
Also, LHC collides many protons at once hopping for some to collide. the number of protons in a bunch is about 1.15x1011 protons
Democracy very very; committed to it and YEAH AM SO COMMITTED TO IT , TO WIN FOR sure .
Please understand from óur own considered Lines
He could say whatever he wants, we are supposed to believe it.
20:04 I guess coincidence that it has the same letters "YHWH" (God and creator)......and also called "The God Particle"......
?
it doesn't, it's YWHWZ, and the higgs boson is only one of those
Hang on, this lecture has already been posted on this channel hasn't it? I'm sure I've already seen this on the RI TH-cam channel
Were you around on the evening of 7th March? It was our first ever live stream! We didn't want to deprive the people who didn't see it at the time though, so here's a nice polished edit.
@@TheRoyalInstitution
No, I've figured it out, I'm getting it confused with "What's next for the LHC?"
th-cam.com/video/edvdzh9Pggg/w-d-xo.html
Ah yes!
th-cam.com/video/rEuM_e4MvgE/w-d-xo.html What if there is no Dark Matter? What is the reason we see the effects we call Dark Matter are just more dense Higgs field areas that were more heavily saturated with antimatter during the Big Bang? Which might explain why there is the matter-antimatter imbalance and why we see things like gravitational lensing. It might also explain some of the Voyager readings NASA claims to have seen in the outer solar system.
Ahhhhhh
Soooooooo....you can either admit you don't quite have a handle on gravity or you can postulate a brand new category of matter that there is no evidence for. Occam's razor need not apply.
The aerial view is looking south towards the Alps, but obviously this guy has it backwards. It is unfortunate that he derailed my concentration so early in the presentation . Such is life...
The Boring Company has proven they can dig tunnels 3 to 4 times cheaper than other companies.
No it hasn't I'm afraid… that's just marketing.
No they didn't. The cost of boring company tunnels are essentially similar as any other commercial tunneling projects. Boring company maybe have it few percent cheaper , because they have it vertically integrated and do not make it for profit. There is a difference between how much it costs to bore it, vs how much somebody is actually going to charge it to bore it.
Master mind. Fear.
i think the money can be better spent recalculating the reality of what is actually happening-
There are no gravitons or Dark energy,.
Were done with buying the same old story line for circular ring colliders. were gonna see what was created just before the big band lol. We believe you should only build linear accelerators from now on. stop losing energy via synchrotron radiation. maybe you wouldnt be influencing pole flips using rings too
You were sorta making sense up to the 'pole flips' bit. If we could have devoted our entire output to it, for our entire history, we could't have achieved an effect that would be even _noticeable_. We've nothing like the power, and it would be hard to notice even if we could have some minuscule affect. Because flips are random, happening in as little as 100,000 years, or as many as 50 million. Nor do we have good data on what happens right before a flip, so how would we recognize that tiny affect?
All that stuff that pops up periodically about how we are overdue is bogus. J. Random Crackpot, or somebody trying to deliver eyeballs to advertisers.
In a desert you wouldn't need a tunnel
Inspiring and important project that needs to be done. However, this shouldn't be our priority at the present moment. This money should be spent on research that focuses on eliminating plastic and fossil fuels and developing more sustainable ways of living on this planet.
As gut wrenching as it is to delay fundamental research and wait for answers to important questions, I think there are more urgent areas of research. For a similar amount of time and money we could put up a new network of advanced satellites to study geosciences and have some money left over to send more probes to neighboring planets, more deep earth and deep ice studies, biological studies of climate changes, and more comprehensive ground based weather radar networks.
You should invite influential people like Elon Musk, Richard Branson, etc. for the promotion of FCC.
I've been studying Tesla Physics since my 7th grade science fair...40 years ago... CERN has intrigued me beyond what their collision half story is all about... I'm curious of the faster than light speed experiments with the Toroid field bubbles effect on the Magnetosphere and Moon... How far does the Z pinch extend beyond the atmosphere ? How are the particles in the Toroid field affected in example, clouds, heavy metals, space weather interaction at the Magnetosphere, sprites, etc., etc... ? I have a few more wordy questions I'd love to ask the electrical engineers ... Dream physics is fun, only Mr. Tesla made the Ether a fun place to play.while awake... Has anyone discussed what the Pineal Gland actually connects to..?
P.S. can you do a show on DWAVE Quantum computing software and hardware tech... If I told you my Pineal Gland has "connected" to the Ether..
How can this be tested..?!? Cheers Mates and thank you for what you do...how is the Earth's core plasma affected ???
P.P.S. oh...how are the Birkeland Current connections with the Sun Affected ???
You know, dark matter seems a little wimpy, eh?
So what you're saying is if you don't know what you're talkin about when the word Dark shows up then 95% of what you're talkin about you have no clue what's going on. is that about right?
Saddens me that people say it's a waste of money. They don't care about finding the truth about reality nor the implications that might have. They only care about their selfish little lives, luckily these aren't the people who are carrying humanity on their shoulders like scientists... These are just people consuming resources and achieving nothing.
These guys spent $14B to see the Higgs boson in their tunnel while it was proven in theory. That's a lot of money to generate nice charts.
This is like nuclear underground testing, it's now simulated and done in supercomputers, not underground.
Higgs boson was discovered in theory in 1962 by Peter Higgs. Science took 40 years to realize it on reality.
If they knew how to resonate a proton they wouldn't have to collide\police them. That's the real trick imo, to create a state of animated suspension.
does science really want to know ?
He speaks so fast!
Considering how the LHC has failed, the level of entitlement to taxpayer money is quite breathtaking.
Define failure?
The tearful chemistry trivially explode because flock micrencephaly remain unlike a last makeup. far, frightened frightening full fumbling functional advantage
But we're in an economic slump, get real guys
Why not build it in Mongolia? It's big, flat (mostly) and nobody cares much what happens there. Then there would be no need for tunneling, if it's built on poles above ground. Just make shure that cattle can pass below and that the nomads accept it. What would the mongolian presidend say if CERN asked if it was ok to build the worlds most advanced instrument in his country and move 100,000 of the worlds sharpest minds to his nation? He would scream with joy and do the Happy Dance.Lack of infrastructure and corruption might be a problem, but it's worth a thought.
So he didn't talk about what they learned from hypothesizing countless nonsense predictions apart from the Higgs. No we don't need a new one because we ain't gonna find anything
It is interesting, when particle physicists will already suggest a source of clean nuclear or particle energy? So far we have observed only the use of electric power generated at chemical reactions for the questionable studies and predictions in particle physics... Where are answers to such simple questions as: What is mass? What is Charge? Regarding the lecturers: it seems they do not understand physics... The idea of The Future Circular Collider requires a criminal investigation.
As a american I love science. But THIS kind of science......politicians and your average american get turned off when we find out a group of students spend a $2 million grant finding out if toast lands buttered side down.
So are they just gunna keep making bigger colliders? Who does this even help? It seems it will do more harm than good!? Who is even funding it and why? Very ambitious for something unnecessary 😏
Not one cent from the United States. Let the Europeans pick up the tab and gain all the ROI, which is dubious.
save some money and skip the next 10 generations of colliders and build one at earth radius already
you need the previous one to feed the next one
I'm an american. Sorry about us, Professor Womersley.
Oh yeah, forgot one little thing... This Higgs thing. old news, there was a guy way back in the 1930's that wrote if you take this wave form, add a little twist to it that no one thought of, you can remove mass from space ships and go off though the galaxy at 90pc/hr and battle space pirates from another galaxy... Now you just sit back and tell us your still not ripping around in the galaxy fighting space pirates and I have to wonder what the heck is going on here. Where is the bad guys and why don't we all wear Len's and all that stuff. Seems like we are missing something here. You just NOW figured out there is some magical field that tells matter to have mass NOW???? Hmm, well I'm not impressed that's for sure... I want to fight space pirates and I wanna fight them NOW.... Heheheh.... So I took those Lenman books a little seriously as maybe they could be in our future but I guess I'll stop reading them so much ... Ok? Maybe?... Darn, still have mass.....
The wooden magician phenotypically snore because earthquake secondly attend including a somber nerve. dispensable, discreet geology
We don't need another collider until you come up with a theory for Quantum Gravity. Until then, it is a complete waste of funds.
The long drawbridge regularly pass because waste ontogenically terrify but a oceanic home. bloody, open cannon
The alluring grade ecologically fix because capital consequently tame towards a calm south africa. amusing, spicy cockroach
Sorry pal we already ran out of other people's money.
The horrible waiter peroperatively trot because garlic concurrently transport as a painstaking bat. truthful, brief chive
This guy knows how to sell. But the weak points rremains what he is selling.
So the second guy is here to openly manipulate you into wanting another waste of money.
Disappointed! Please, circumscribe it around the moon. I was wondering if we build the tube around the moon on pillars and then remove the pillars, would it float above the moon surface or it breaks the ring and crashes. I will try to calculate the pressure on the tube, due to the moon's gravity.
But why would you remove the pillars?
@@Kalumbatsch i hope then the ring can be tossed into space 😃 cool right?
@@gowthamkudupudi1012 Interesting idea.