I am a noahide and my father is a christian. I showed Acts 7 with all of its errors to my father and he had a weak defence for each error. He actually said that Sh'kem (Nablus) is the name of the province which covers Hevron as well. I am convinced that to be a christian, one must stop thinking.
@Breastplate of Righteousness - Channel “16 And were carried over into Sychem, and laid in the sepulchre that Abraham bought for a sum of money of the sons of Emmor the father of Sychem.”
Thank you so much, Rabbi Singer. Please forgive my meager donation. I believe it was God's will, and all I have left now is bus money! Haha! I smoke too much. Here is my confession: I come from an Orthodox Christian background, nominally, with great respect for Jewish learning and tradition. I think your insights are a treasure, and your anger well-founded - more often than not! May you be blessed in abundance, for the premium you place on the truth. May Our Just Teacher continue to grant you wisdom, for the benefit of curious believers like me. P.S. - If you have not done so yet, would you mind discussing the Wedding at Cana? I think there is an intentional parallel between the Miracle at Cana, and the Crossing of the Red Sea (or Sea of Reeds), i.e. the passage through a frankly vagina-shaped body of water that annually turns red, like wine, symbolizing the rebirth and sustenance of the Shekinah, in the Holy Spirit. Maybe I am reading too much into this. But besides distilling the life of Christ, this smacks of Yom Kippur - no wonder Jesus was a Goth! On a related note: What do you think is wrong, on a fundamental level, with the concept of Christian repentance? The self-reflection of Christ, his emphasis on personal sacrifice and the inner struggle for atonement, guided by God's grace - these are all central to living an authentic Christian life. We will always fall short, it is true. And in the Stoic mindset, this necessitates repentance (as well as, perhaps, a form of perfectionism that could be crippling). L'Chaim!
Repentance is not about perfection in a human being, but rather about how we humans connect with God. We need to reach out and admit our flaws and sins verbally and ask for forgiveness. That opens up a flow between the divine and the human.
Shalom Rabbi 😊 This is the 2nd important piece of religious info I've learnt today. Maybe I've been in the Twilight Zone bcoz it's the first time I've seen a photo of/ heard about the Tomb of the Patriarchs. I'm really surprised that through the centuries, nobody from the Vatican or anywhere else had said anything about this glaring error 😨 These would be people who would be more familiar with the Biblical locations. I shall read up about this amazing place. God bless you, Rabbi 😊 Happy Friday 🙏🌹
The context of Acts 7 is Stephen giving a summary of the history. Which is also what Joshua 24:32 says. The order of events in Acts 7:16 places that before going into Egypt, which is factually correct. To presume Luke was ignorant or wrong when he was quoting Steven, and the context shows basically an ordinal summary, I would encourage you, as HaShem is gracious, be gracious as well
That is not the only criticism of Luke. Academic scholarship has long known that Luke has no intimate knowledge of Israel. In fact, I just saw a very interesting documentary that I believe aired on the history valley podcast. A man whose name I forget was an expert in ancient cartography. Any points out in Luke's descriptions how completely and thoroughly ignorant Luke is with respect to the interior of Israel. It's not hard to find I'll see if I can provide the site. But the point is, the author of Luke, whoever it actually was, knew some of the coastal regions of the Mediterranean indicating he might have been a trades person or have some experience in travel. But when he makes reference to geographical points of reference in the holy Land he doesn't have clue. Also, I point anyone reading this to very cogent and persuasive arguments showing that the first two chapters of Luke, which include the birth narrative, were later interpolations by a completely different writer. And there are so many proofs for that it is very difficult for any sober mind to deny it. I'm at the point now where instead of trying to explain the Christian apologists that the Tanahk is a Jewish scripture, given to the Jews and understood by the Jews and not apologists. Instead, I just refer them to folks like Bart Ehrman...
@@davidkatz341 I've seen videos discussing criticisms of Luke's Israel geography and how the criticisms are misplaced. One of the criticisms is in regards to travel up and then over in one of the regions but it actually makes sense due to the geographical features while the criticism focused on simply the cardinal directions as the crow flies. Also, the same people who make such textual claims about the Gospels make such claims regarding the documentary hypothesis and Deutero-Isaiah. Ehrman is wrong regarding such things. Plenty of channels from Testify to InspiringPhilosophy have thoroughly covered responding to Erhman and other critic's claims against Luke and the other wrtiers
@@voymasa7980 there are of course arguments on both sides. How do you explain passages one and two? In light of the entire tone of Luke in which he seems to adopt a holy different concept of Jesus becoming the son of God. Not the conception but rather the baptism. I'm not a Greek scholar by any means, but I can appreciate when I see the difference in writing styles explained in detail. The same person did not write the rest of Luke. It is obvious the same person who wrote the majority of Luke also wrote Acts. Overall it is clear to anyone who understands Jewish life that the writers of the gospels were neither Jews nor have the ability to read or write Hebrew. Let me give you an analogy. Suppose you were Amish. I doubt that you are since we're having this exchange via text but suppose you were. And then you read something I wrote about Amish life. I wrote about how it was to be born Amish and to be raised Amish. I talked about Amish cultural practices and the way Amish interpretation of scripture leads them to this type of lifestyle. Further assume that I'm not Amish. Do you think that you as an Amish person would see right through me? Of course you would. So I read the 27 books of the New testament. It couldn't be more obvious. I could start with any text you like but I prefer explaining what it's like when a Jew reads the letters of Paul. You almost choke with laughter. Paul the Pharisee? Paul couldn't even read Hebrew. Now acts makes the claim that Paul was a student of Gamliel, plain absurdity because there are records of such things but you take my meaning. Paul's exegesis of the Hebrew word seed? Yikes! And Christians pick that up and run with it and never bothered a check elsewhere with the same word is used and is correctly translated by Christian translators. We could have this discussion all day. We can move on to the gospels. I disagree that Matthew had any nefarious motive in inserting his fulfillment citations. People like Rabbi Singer for example think he did it maliciously but I do not. He was just ignorant. He couldn't read Hebrew he had it only in Greek. We could go line by line and I realized that you don't accept that the Greek scriptures were anything other than later works by non-Jews and countries decades later hundreds of miles away. But we do. There is no way to reconcile Jewish belief with Christian belief. May I ask have you ever learned to read Hebrew?
@@davidkatz341 have you ever read the Jewish Annotated New Testament? Have you had any discussion with Messianic Jews? If it was such a laughability by Jews then there wouldn't be such writings. I've been working on learning to read Hebrew because I find reading and understanding a text in the original or closest to original languages, helps to gain better understanding. There are three major views on Paul's writings, including Paul against Judaism, Paul with Judaism, and Paul and Judaism (if I recall the classifications correctly). A common mistake that Christians and others make is to read Paul as Aristotelians rather than trying to understand it as though written by a Jew. That's also why many major Christian factions completely misread the Shema, including James White.
@@abrahamskaria4645 Don’t mean to embarrass you by pointing out the ignorance in your post. Nehemia 13 1. At that time they read to the people from the Book of Moses, and it was found written that no Ammonite or Moabite might ever enter the congregation of God, 2 since they did not meet Israel with bread and water, and hired Balaam against them to curse them; but our God turned the curse into a blessing. 3 When they heard the Teaching, they separated all the alien admixture from Israel. Notice the scripture is talking about Ammonites and Moabites??? The Jewish nation loves us Noahides and welcomes us with open hearts. They’re the most honest people I’ve ever met. Beautiful Children of Gd! You should try studying The Torah
Ooo, another Paul classic worth reading for comedy and occasional tears: the Apocalypse of Paul. It has a cute lake of fire 🔥, Acheron and Tartatusean angels. Yes, it so full of open references to the Greek Afterlife that it induces side-splitting laughter. Tartarus, the Greek Purgatory, and the Lake of Fire being Acheron - Nope, sorry, Paul black and icy. Just totally worth it for the laughs 😆😂🤣🤪🤭!
Start with Stuart Federow’s Aleph-Bet course on this channel. Learn to pronounce Hebrew words even if you don’t know them. There are plenty of Hebrew. Bible study videos on TH-cam.
My favorite part about Jesus’ little saga is how he was like “I’m gonna send the Holy Spirit, and then there will be 50K+ sects all claiming their own interpretation of my nonsense and these sects will be filled with individuals who interpret according to their own arbitrary views and talking points”. So clearly divine!!! Lmao but seriously Christianity is a fools religion.
There is a small town in Missouri I drove through. There are not more then 5000 people in the town, yet I counted over 12 different Churches from the road. There were many more I did not see
@@haroldensle6656 No more foolish then following a dead failed Messiah. There are thousands of Chritian denominations, so tell me which Religion is foolish.
The Greek scholars sat in Rome had very little to go on to create their Jesus character and his fictional ministry and death. They had the Septuagint which was in Greek but a poor translation of the Hebrew Bible as attested by Rabbi Singer.
I am always amazed even of myself that anyone today thinks they understand the scriptures at a greater level than those who were alive 2000 plus years ago. They were alive when the Temple still existed!! Clearly there is an enemy to God in the world. He has been very active. It comes down to what the truth is, who has it and who doesn't. It stands to reason that those who are OF this world push the concept of man above God. I think it is clear who does that.
@@marksimmonds2353 There is no part of Christianity in which the believer understands himself to be in a power position. Complete dependence on the redemptive work of Jesus Christ through His death, burial, and resurrection is understood to be the only way. This is God reaching out to man. Counterwise are those who believe it is within man's power to bring God to earth!! It is not by His, God's, power and will. This simply does not make sense. God is the all mighty not man. He could and can destroy the earth and all in it any time He wants. He chose not to and in the process mankind is given a choice. Salvation is by Him alone or through people!? I believe the best option is to choose Him and His way. God bless.
Perhaps you missed the part where Daniel was not told about 'some things'. By 100AD the NT was completed so the 'missing information' was available, even if written in Greek: Da:12:4: But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.
@@kevingoode521 Jesus and Christianity has been the enemy of the Jewish people for the last two thousand years. Or isn't being murdered, tortured and persecuted by Christianity count as being the enemy of the Jewish people. And let's not forget about the forced conversions at the hands of Christianity. Maybe you should have a look at the history of Christianity before you say anything else. Because it certainly makes you look like a 🤡. And as a side note Jesus isn't G-d, isn't even the Messiah as you falsely claim. And isn't even the Prince of peace as you also claim. Because when I look at the state of the world today I quite clearly see that Jesus failed miserably in that regard if in fact he was the Prince of peace. In fact if you actually read the gospels you would find that your false Messiah said that he came to bring the sword and sow division. Not something a Prince of peace would do now is it.
According to a translator of Acts. says thet it seems that Avraham bought two graves one from the Efron at Hevron and one grave from children of the Hamor in Skekim. Could this also means that buying a grave is the first step to own the whole land. And in this case from the south to North. i. e The whole Israel? Or is there any another thing behind?
@@indo3052 Acts 7: 16. in Genesis 23 Avraham buy the grave at Hebron! while Acts says it was Shekem which is northern Israel. Luke follow Septaginta while Tovia follow Tanach. So by this you see the different, and Tovia is convinced that the NT-Writers has twisted and changed the Hebrew Bible. I suggested that both Shekem and Hebron could be right since Avraham could have bought an extra grave in the north. But I do not have any text to prove that.
There are no mistakes. Joshua claims Joseph was buried in land that Jacob, Joseph’s father, bought from “the sons of Hamor the father of Shechem.” Stephen in Acts asserts Joseph’s tomb was part of the property Abraham bought from “the sons of Emmor the father of Sychem. Jacob was buried in the field of Machpelah, what his grandfather Abraham purchased from Ephron the Hittite (Genesis 50:13). Note: Stephen in Acts is not referring to this transaction or burial. Abraham bought the land of Sichem/Shechem/Sychem from the sons of Hamor/Emmor, and then built an altar there (Genesis 12:6-7; Acts 7:16). However, Abraham did not settle in Shechem. Consequently, ownership of this real estate reverted back to Hamor’s family. A few centuries later, Abraham’s grandson Jacob repurchased the land of Shechem from Hamor’s family (Genesis 33:18-19). Jacob’s son Joseph, and Joseph’s brethren, were buried in Shechem (Acts 7:15-16).
You're saying that Luke quoted Stephen correctly, even though Stephen made a "colossal error" that Luke's audience (and Luke obviously) would have known was a "colossal error" and this somehow makes Luke a bad historian?
Hi.i don't think Stephen spoke false info.ACTS 7:16 is about a tomb that Abraham brought from the sons of Ha'mor in Shechem. The Genesis 23:17 , can not be presumed to be the same place as mentioned in ACTS 7:16. Genesis is a field,with a cave and trees. Stephen most likely would know about the location at Machpelah,and he was not getting Machpelah mixed up with Shechem info he gave. Joseph,son of Jacob son of Isaac ,is claimed as being buried at I think the She'chem district area anyway.
The field,cave and tombs are from Hittites. The Tomb in ACTS is from the sons of Ha'mor. It seems to suggest to separate active sites.and the ACTS verse does not seem to be confirming that Abraham was buried at She'chem.ACTS 7:15 And he died,himself and our fathers, (our fathers is not highlighting Abraham).
@Asif Brett Ishmael Makki. no it is false for different reasons than you think. Acts 7 :16 says: 16 Their bodies were brought back to Shechem and placed in the tomb that Abraham had bought from the sons of Hamor at Shechem for a certain sum of money. According to B'reshis this is false. B'reshis 33: 19 וַיִּ֜קֶן אֶת־חֶלְקַ֣ת הַשָּׂדֶ֗ה אֲשֶׁ֤ר נָֽטָה־שָׁם֙ אׇהֳל֔וֹ מִיַּ֥ד בְּנֵֽי־חֲמ֖וֹר אֲבִ֣י שְׁכֶ֑ם בְּמֵאָ֖ה קְשִׂיטָֽה׃ The parcel of land where he pitched his tent he purchased from the kin of Hamor, Shechem’s father, for a hundred kesitahs. Ya'akov bought this land from the sons of Hamor to pitch his tent on. This is a TOTALLY DIFFWRENT PIECE OF LAND FROM WHAT AVRAHAM BOUGHT AS A TOMB!!! B'reshis 23:19 וְאַחֲרֵי־כֵן֩ קָבַ֨ר אַבְרָהָ֜ם אֶת־שָׂרָ֣ה אִשְׁתּ֗וֹ אֶל־מְעָרַ֞ת שְׂדֵ֧ה הַמַּכְפֵּלָ֛ה עַל־פְּנֵ֥י מַמְרֵ֖א הִ֣וא חֶבְר֑וֹן בְּאֶ֖רֶץ כְּנָֽעַן׃ And then Abraham buried his wife Sarah in the cave of the field of Machpelah, facing Mamre-now Hevron, in the land of Canaan.
Luke didn't write Luke he is saying the Author of Luke got it wrong he didn't speak to eyewitnesses cause they were all dead by the time Luke/Acts was written
What makes the Bible reliable is that the original manuscripts were never all compiled, or in the same locations, even if there were copyist errors all 99% of the manuscripts correlate. Inerrancy was impossible as there were no dictating machines, typewriters, photocopiers or printing presses two thousand years ago.
i think what Tovia mention as 'incorrect information' used as a source would be Samaritan traditions that had the burial places in their region, he really should have mentioned that. So Acts is using a real tradition rather than making a mistake, albeit a tradition not accepted by either Jews or Christians today, yet current at the time. I realise this does not 'solve' the problem, but it shows its not so black and white. If it's true as Acts says Christianity was preached in Samaria then their traditions could easily find their way into the mix for Luke to use as a source. I watch Tovia he often makes great arguments, this is a weaker one that isn't so hard to work around in this case since there appear to have been a couple of traditions, of course picking the less orthodox one is rather what i'd have thought our Jewish friends might have expected if they feel Christianity is a little wayward
I am no scholar but someone please explain to how the Gospel of Luke was written between 63-65 when Luke 1:3 the letter addressed to most excellent Theophilus that being said Antioch seems to be the location and since Theophilus was Patriarch from 169-182 I have a major issue. I am sure that somehow they will twist this fact but really? Maybe another Theophilus he felt was excellent that lived down the road? Or maybe it is not a person but symbolic cause of name meaning. Sorry but this crap goes on and on. I just want the truth.
Judges 24: 32 "And the bones of Joseph, which the children of Israel brought up out of Egypt, buried they in Shechem, in a parcel of ground which Jacob bought of the sons of Hamor the father of Shechem for an hundred pieces of silver: and it became the inheritance of the children of Joseph." Luke 7 is correct in that it is telling the story of the burial of Jacob, not Abraham. Luke attributes Abraham as to buying this land because the promise of the land was made by covenant from God to Abraham and when his grandson Jacob purchased the land, it is correctly attributed as if Abraham had bought it. I am surprised a Hebrew Rabbi doesn't know this.
Luke is recounting the story Stephen told. Stephen, may have gotten some details incorrect in his narrative, but Luke, if correctly quoting the words of Stephen, tells the account correctly.
Some of the Jews affirm that they were buried in Sychem (Kuinoel). As the Scriptures do not anywhere deny that the patriarchs were buried in Sychem, it cannot be proved that Stephen was in error. There is one circumstance of strong probability to show that he was correct. At the time when this defense was delivered, "Sychem" was in the hands of the Samaritans, between whom and the Jews there was a violent hostility. Of course, the Jews would not be willing to concede that the Samaritans had the bones of their ancestors, and hence, perhaps the opinion had been maintained that they were buried in Hebron. Looks like it might've been you guys again.
Yes there are certainly torturous explanations that Christians put forward to try and explain a basic and glaring error in the text. Luke said the tomb of the patriarchs is in Shechem. It's not literary device, it's not a metaphor nor is it allegory. It is a mistake. By the way, I refer you to very persuasive arguments that Luke was an opponent of the Virgin birth theory and in fact the first two chapters of Luke were later interpolations. I've heard similar theories with respect to Mark but I don't buy those. The arguments about The book of Luke however are entirely different matter. It is as obvious and interpolation as the woman taken in adultery is in the book of John. And yet Christians don't seem to care... I would.
Acts 7:15 and Acts 7:16 has copied Joshua 24:32 and made an error. Acts copies almost word for word Joshua 24:32 but made one error. Acts 7:15 and Acts 7:16 is Joshua 24:32 with an error in Acts 7:16 where the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Abraham but in the Jewish scripture the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Jacob in Joshua 24:32 and in Genesis 33:18 - 33:19. . Here is what is copied in Acts and where the error occurs in Acts Joshua 24:32 And Joseph’s bones, which the Israelites had brought up from Egypt (is correctly copied in Acts 7:15), were buried at Shechem in the tract of land (is correctly copied in Acts 7:16) that Jacob (this is the error in Acts 7:16 which says that Abraham not Jacob) bought for a hundred pieces of silver from the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem. . Acts 7:15 Then Jacob went down to Egypt, where he and our ancestors died. Acts 7:16 Their bodies were brought back to Shechem and placed in the tomb that Abraham had bought from the sons of Hamor at Shechem for a certain sum of money. . In Genesis 12:6- 12:7 at Shechem God said he will give the land to his offspring.and Abraham built a small altar.(on which he offered a sacrifice as a thank you to God for the food he ate which was his custom and this is why he built so many altars during his travels). . In Genesis 33:18 - 33:19 Jacob camped in sight of the city of Shechem and for a hundred pieces of silver, he bought from the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem, the plot of ground where he pitched his tent. . Genesis 12:6- 12:7 does not say Abraham purchased land from anyone however if Jacob repurchased the land in Joshua 24:32 (which some claim but is not in the scripture) this still means that it is Jacob who bought it as land for a tomb because Abraham did not stay and he continued travelling and building altars wherever he travelled to thank God for the food he ate . . The land brought for a tomb by Abraham was in Hebron where Sarah (Genesis 23:19), Abraham.(Genesis 25:7 - 25:8), Isaac (Genesis 25:5 - 25:6 and Genesis 35:28 - 35:29), Isaac’s wife Rebecca and Jacob (Genesis 47:28 - 47:31) are buried. . The land brought by Jacob was in Shechem where his son Joseph is buried in Joshua 24:32 . The error in Acts 7:16 is to say that Abraham made the purchase of the land however Joshua 24:32 says it was Jacob not Abraham and Genesis 33:18 - 33:19 also says it was Jacob who camped in sight of the city of Shechem and for a hundred pieces of silver, he bought from the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem, the plot of ground where he pitched his tent. . The error in Act 7:16 is to say Abraham purchased the land because it contradicts the Tanakh in Genesis 33:18 - 33:19 and it contradicts Joshua 24:32 which both say the land was purchased by Jacob from the sons of Hamor.
@@حامدالمهتدي So Luke (he first part of Luke Acts) has a same structure to its Gospel as Matthew and Mark. It has many of the same stories. It, and I'm going off memory here and I could be thinking about Matthew rather than Luke, straight up copies from Mark passages. He adds some things and removed somethings but at its core like 42% of Luke is found in Mark. About 1% of that is found in Luke but not Matthew. 56% of Matthew is Markian. 10% of that is found in only Luke and Matthew. There are passages found in only Luke and Matthew and not Mark but it's a lesser % of their books typically than what's unique to both Gospel and what's shared between the 3. Mark has 97% of its book used in other books. Because the books share so much in common, it's concluded that the books were based off of whichever one was first. Since Mark has 97% of it used in other Gospels, it was either first or plagiarized. I'm sure there's other reasons people think Mark was first (perhaps linguistic reasons and terms and writing styles used, perhaps Mark has earlier completed manuscripts). For whatever reason, Mark is dated first by pretty much everyone. Take Frank Turek and Normal Geisler. In their book together they tried to argue that Mark was written in like 40 or 50 CE. No scholar agrees with that dating and it's very fringe. They still placed it as the earliest Gospel. Even the ones most charitable to Christianity insist Mark is first when really it'd benefit Christians to have Matthew first (since tradition states an eyewitness wrote that one). There's a lot of historical and textual reasons why Mark is placed first. John doesnt follow the same mold or stories for the most part as the other Gospels. This is how we know it was vastly more independent than the authors of Matthew and Luke. While I'm always down to be convinced about alternate ideas of the order of when these books were written, there's valid reasons academics and scholars agree on this order
It's worth noting that Christians apparently did used to argue Matthew came first but that's been mostly debunked and your argument was that Luke predates Mark and not that Matthew was the first. Like I said, it'd actually benefit Christians if they found out that the only alleged eyewitness written synoptic Gospel came first. Now Christians have to explain why Matthew (an eyewitness) would use Mark (not an eyewitness) as a source. Likely this proves Matthew wasn't an eyewitness
@@mattmiller9809 Luke had not copied from Mark's account, neither from the Gospel of Matthew. It's the author of the Gospel of Matthew who had copied from previous accounts. Why? Because most NT scholars agree that Mark was the first to be written, then Matthew, then Luke, and finally John. While others are still maintaining different chronological orders to date the four canonical gospels, among them some scholars who refute the hypothesis of Marcan priority and prefer instead of it the hypothesis of Lucan priority.
@@delfimoliveira8883 Acts 7:15 and Acts 7:16 is Joshua 24:32 with an error in Acts 7:16 where the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Abraham but in the Jewish scripture the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Joshua in Joshua 24:32. . Acts 7:15 Then Jacob went down to Egypt, where he and our ancestors died. Acts 7:16 Their bodies were brought back to Shechem and placed in the tomb that Abraham had bought from the sons of Hamor at Shechem for a certain sum of money. . Joshua 24:32 And Joseph’s bones, which the Israelites had brought up from Egypt, were buried at Shechem in the tract of land that Jacob bought for a hundred pieces of silver from the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem.
Why Jews today don't stone to dead adulterous as the Torah commands it? Did Jesus was right to call his people hypocrets because they were stoning women instead of men and women? Why did Jesus say "Whoever is free of sin, cast the first stone"? Why a person is not free of sin can't stone others, according the Torah?
Jesus said the temple would be destroyed, Jesus said the kingdom would be taken away, and the survivors of the judgement scattered throughout the earth. Jesus said the city of jerusalem would be destroyed in that generations life. Jesus said the time of worshipping in an earthly temple was ending.and would soon end..where is the temple, where is the nation of israel, i only see a state given by the other nations, where are the levites? Everything jesus said was ending,,, ended...the temple has been destroyed, the sacrifices have ceased, the priesthood has been changed...Jesus is the prophet moses prophesied of...all were cut off who rejected him in his generation, The truth is more clear than the error.
Genesis 1:26-27 (KJV 1900): And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. 27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. let us make man in our image who is us who is we I'm certain that angles aren't as Yahweh so who be us that is in heaven who be we. This be plural. It would make more sense for you guys to have Torah studies then Christian bashing at least I would make more sense to me
Luke is precious. Paul quoting Euripides just slays me. “Pentheus, Pentheus, why do you fight against the pricks?” shifted over to over to “Paul, Paul, why do you fight against the pricks?” is classic comedy. 😆😂🤣🤪🤭 It’s such a reveal that Paul is playing games. People should really thank Luke, whose stupidity is so heartwarming.
@Edward Messiner, should be the later chapters, Paul is talking abou his conversion on the Road to Damascus. It’s the third version, each version differs from each other. Others hear a voice, suddenly they don’t. Paul falls down, everyone suddenly falls down. Since both Paul and Herod Tetrarch went to the same play by Euripides, the Tetrarch cracks a joke about almost wishing he was a Christian. Sort of expressing that he wishes he could get away with lying 🤥 like Paul. Roman guy is not in on the joke by the way. You are very good, Edward, right section.
One cannot read the scripture literally. Bible is the spiritual book. These stories or places do not even have to be localized on the map. The same applies to different characters. For example, in the Bible we have a story of Joseph whom Pharaoh made the governor of Egypt. But this is not true. The idea of a foreigner reaching the top of Egyptian society sounds unlikely and there is no archaeological or written record of a Prime Minister in Egypt called Joseph. Please, do not think that the bible is a historic book. It is to move your soul, the spirit of the Creator within you. Blessings to all of you.
You bring up a very interesting point. Rabbi Singer, if a Locational Error such as the one made by Luke proves that his writings are FALSE, being that he is just a mere man? Would that not disqualify the writings of Moses when he writes about Hashem using the wrong tense of a word when Hashem is talking about himself? Certainly, the creator of all Languages not knowing the proper tense of a word to use is a much bigger error than the wrong location mentioned by someone that is relying on information obtained from others. Now, for the sake of Righteousness and Justice, let's apply the same weights to both of these errors equally!
HaShem Wrote His Torah BEFORE He Created His World. Moshe broke the first luchos/tablets when he saw the golden calf idol as he descended Mt Sinai. After this debacle, Moshe returned to Mt Sinai and then he wrote the second luchos when HaShem Dictated it to Moshe. EVERYTHING that is in the Tenach was either written directly by G-D or Inspired by G-D through prophecy which He Placed Into His prophets’s minds. Every single letter is from HaShem. PERIOD. And…HaShem Is Perfect…He Makes No Mistakes!
@@HO-ui7uk Assalamu Alaikum brother, 1. Why did the first Muslims believe that the son to be sacrificed was Isaac Ishaq? The Torah Taurat names Isaac Ishaq as the son to be sacrificed and the Quran tells the Jewish people to observe their covenant with Allah which is the Torah Taurat in Quran 2:40 and confirms what is with the Jewish people in the Torah Taurat in Quran 2:41 and says in Quran 4:136 “... whoever has no faith in … Allah's Books … then he has strayed far away (from Allah)” and in Quran 3:93 “… Say (Prophet Muhammad, to the Jews of Yathrib), "Bring the Torah Taurat here and recite it (to me as evidence) if what you say is true." meaning the Quran confirms the Torah Taurat to show that humans do not have the power to change the written word of Allah (in Quran 6:34, Quran 6:115, Quran 10:64, Quran 18:27 and Quran 30:3) which the Jews have been commanded to follow forever in the Torah Taurat by observing the Sabbath Day in all their generations in a covenant agreement made with Allah forever in the Torah Taurat which is confirmed in the Quran as proof Allah is real and as proof the Quran is truthful. . 2. Why did later Muslims believe that the son to be sacrificed was Ishmael Ismail? Later Muslims said that Ishmael Ismail was the only son for 13 years and therefore the Jews changed the Torah Taurat. However when you read the Torah Taurat you will find that Ishmael Ismail and Isaac Ishaq were both living in the same house before the sacrifice and it was after Ishmael Ismail and Hagar Hajar are sent into the desert that the only son living with Abraham Ibrahim is Isaac Ishaq and this is why Allah says “Take your only son Isaac Ishaq and sacrifice him” meaning the faith in Quran 4:136 which the first Muslims had in the Torah Taurat was the correct faith meaning later Muslims did not read the Torah Taurat and believed what other people told them when they claimed the sacrifice was before the birth of Isaac Ishaq. . In both the Quran and Torah Taurat Isaac Ishaq is given to Prophet Abraham Ibrahim twice. The first time is by the angel of Allah with the birth of Isaac Ishaq and the second time is after the angel of Allah stops the sacrifice and gives Isaac Ishaq to Prophet Abraham Ibrahim a second time. The name good news is always the name of Isaac Ishaq in Quran chapters 11, 15, 19, 29, 37 and 51. . In both the Quran and Torah Taurat Ishmael Ismail is not mentioned anywhere in Quran chapter 37 or in Torah Taurat Genesis 22 which is the story of the sacrifice. . In the Quran Allah only blesses Abraham Ibrahim and Isaac Ishaq in the story of the sacrifice. Allah has left no blessing or mention of Ishmael Ismail in the story of the sacrifice because he is not in this story. . The Quran confirms the Torah Taurat however Satan Shaitan tests Muslims to show who believes the word of Allah was changed in the Torah Taurat in the same way Satan Shaitan tests Christians to show who believes Prophet Jesus Isa is Allah. . 3. The story of the sacrifice in Quran chapter 37 starts in Quran chapter 19. The story of Prophet Isaac Ishaq who is called the “Good News” son is the story of the son of Sarah and Prophet Abraham Ibrahim in Quran chapters 11, 15, 19, 29, 37 and 51. In Quran 19:46 - 19:49 Abraham Ibrahim lived with his father and prays and when he went away Allah gave him Isaac Ishaq in Quran 19:49 meaning this is the story of the son of Sarah. . The story in Quran 19:46 - 19:49 which is the story of Isaac Ishaq the son of Sarah is the same story in the beginning of the story of the sacrifice in Quran 37:98 - Quran 37:101. 1. Quran 37:98 is Quran 19:46 Prophet Abraham Ibrahim is living with his father. 2. Quran 37:99 is Quran 19:47 Prophet Abraham Ibrahim prays. 3. Quran 37:100 is Quran 19:48 Prophet Abraham Ibrahim prays. 4. Quran 37:101 (We gave him the good news) is Quran 19:49 (“We gave him Isaac Ishaq”). . The angel of Allah gave the Good News son Prophet Isaac Ishaq twice. The first time the angel of Allah gave Prophet Isaac Ishaq is as the Good News in Quran 37:101 which is the same as when Prophet Isaac Ishaq is given the first time in Quran 19:49. This Good News son Prophet Isaac Ishaq is to be sacrificed in the next verse Quran 37:102. . The second time Allah gave Prophet Isaac Ishaq is after Allah stopped the sacrifice and gave Prophet Isaac Ishaq a second time to Prophet Abraham Ibrahim in Quran 37:112 . The story of the sacrifice only blesses Prophet Abraham Ibrahim and Prophet Isaac Ishaq both separately and together as the father and son. Allah has left no other blessings in the story of the sacrifice in Quran chapter 37 meaning the Quran confirms the Torah Taurat as proof no one can change the words of Allah as promised in Quran 6:34, Quran 6:115, Quran 10:64, Quran 18:27 and Quran 30:30 Quran 4:136 Koran 4:136 “... and whoever has no faith in … Allah's Books … then he has strayed far away (from Allah).”
@@HO-ui7uk Jesus did not write anything because everything Jesus taught by his mouth was already written in the Tanakh Jewish scripture meaning Jesus did not add or subtract from what is in Tanakh Jewish scripture. . The four Gospels are four reports about Jesus meaning Jesus never wrote anything and what he said was passed by mouth until it was written many years later. . There are no names on the original earliest four Gospel Injil manuscripts meaning the names Mark, Matthew, Luke and John were all added later meaning no one knows who wrote them. Quran 5:68 says observe the Torah Taurat and the Gospel Injil and Quran 5:47 tells Christians to judge by the Gospel Injil meaning whatever in the Gospel Injil is confirmed in the Torah Taurat came from Jesus and whatever contradicts the Torah Taurat came from the unknown writers who are traditionally called Mark, Matthew, Luke and John in a test from Allah described in 1 Kings 13:14 - 13:24 teaching that the word of Allah will not change and do not believe anyone (for example Mark, Matthew, Luke and John) if in stories they claim the word of Allah has changed. . 1. In Quran 4:157 Jesus was not killed on the cross confirms the words of Jesus 3 days after the crucifixion in Gospel of John 20:17 “I have not yet ascended to the Father (Allah, meaning I have not yet died)” ... . 2. In Quran 4:158 Jesus was saved on the cross with sleep when his soul ascended to heaven in Quran 39:42 and the way Allah would save Jesus on the cross is foreshadowed before the time of the crucifixion in the Gospel Injil as follows. . Gospel of Mark 5:39 "... The child is not dead but sleeping", Gospel of Matthew 9:24 "... For the maiden meaning the girl has not died but sleeps ..." Gospel of Luke 8:52 "... She is not dead but sleeping." Gospel of Luke 8:54 - 8:55 “…"Damsel meaning girl, wake up!" And her spirit returned, and she stood up at once, and he ordered that she be given something to eat. (This was proof that she was alive and not dead). . 3. In Quran 5:75 and Quran 3:144 is the natural death of Jesus 2000 years ago which is mentioned three days after the crucifixion in Gospel of John 20:17 Jesus says to her (Mary Magdalene), "Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father (Allah, meaning I have not yet died); but go to my brothers (my disciples), and tell them: 'I am ascending to my Father (Allah, meaning Jesus will die like every human dies as proof to his people that he is human meaning do not let a miracle make you believe I am not a human like you) …” . 4. In Quran 19:36 Jesus said “Allah is my Lord and your Lord” meaning Jesus is teaching his people that he is not Allah and this is said 3 days after the crucifixion in Gospel of John 20:17 Jesus says to her (Mary Magdalene), "Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father (Allah, meaning I have not yet died); but go to my brothers (my disciples), and tell them: 'I am ascending to my Father (to my creator Allah, meaning Jesus will die like every human dies as proof to his people that he is human meaning do not let a miracle make you believe I am more than a human like you) and your Father (to your creator Allah); to my Allah (to my Lord) and your Allah (to your Lord).” . 5. Allah chose the Israelites and gave them the Torah Taurat and told them to observe the Sabbath Day in all their generations forever meaning Allah decreed Judaism and the Torah Taurat forever so that the following might be fulfilled. . a. The Torah Taurat shows which verses in the Gospel Injil confirm the Torah Taurat meaning they came from Jesus and which verses in the Gospel Injil contradict the Torah Taurat meaning they came from Mark, Matthew, Luke or John in a test described in 1 Kings 13:14 - 13:24 teaching that the word of Allah will not change and do not believe anyone who claims the word of Allah has changed. . b. In the same way Allah is testing Muslims in every generation in the story of the sacrifice in a test described in 1 Kings 13:14 - 13:24 teaching that the word of Allah will not change and do not believe anyone who claims the word of Allah has changed.
ZERO ERRORS HERE.. Please try to follow.. Abraham bought land in Hebron: Burial for Sarah, Abraham, Isaac then Jacob.. Gen 23.. Then, Jacob bought land in Shechem where Joseph was buried.. Josh 24 Abraham also bought land in Shechem.. Gen 12:6-7, referenced in the Acts 7:16 You actually don't have to attack Christianity to promote your stand.. Not a good sign.. NB: All above is my opinion, not to be used as extra ammunition against Christianity..
‘’Ark of thy covenant’’ its been found. 😕 With Yeshua’s blood 🩸 on thy mercy seat (left side) next to a bus station. Tested in Israel 🇮🇱 (it’s human) and not of this world. I type this for you, not me. 🙏
This man speaks of Christian Bible writers like they are not Jews ,the Christian Bible writers are Jews who lived in the time people were more religious and understand the meaning of scripture well.
A) There are all too many Jews who don’t know their Bibles and always have been. Being Jewish does not (yet!) mean that you just simply know your Bible. B) “This man” is repeatedly demonstrating that the authors of the Christian Bible (the “New Testament”) did not, in fact, know what they were talking about. “This man” has also admitted many times that, if the Christian Bible made sense and aligned with Jewish Bible, we’d all be in church now. 2,000 years of “who’s right?” would not have existed and _should not_ have existed if the Christian Bible were actually true.
No Rabbi Singer, it is not Luke who is wrong in what is recorded in Acts 7:16; that is because, to begin with what is written in Acts chapter 7 is a direct word to word speech of Stephen, who was a Jew and as you can see from his speech with excellent knowledge of both the Torah and the Tanakh (in some cases if not better than you, at least as much as you know)! So, was Stephen wrong in quoting Acts 7:16? Well according to Genesis 33:18-20 and Joshua 24:32 he is absolutely right. That is because, Genesis 33:18-20 say “Then Jacob came safely to the city of Shechem, which is in the land of Canaan, when he came from Padan Aram; and he pitched his tent before the city. And he bought the parcel of land, where he had pitched his tent, from the children of Hamor, Shechem's father, for one hundred pieces of money. Then he erected an altar there and called it El Elohe Israel”. And Joshua 24:32 say “The bones of Joseph, which the children of Israel had brought up out of Egypt, they buried at Shechem, in the plot of ground which Jacob had bought from the sons of Hamor the father of Shechem for one hundred pieces of silver, and which had become an inheritance of the children of Joseph. And Eleazar the son of Aaron died. They buried him in a hill belonging to Phinehas his son, which was given to him in the mountains of Ephraim”. So, who is the ignorant about the written Word of God here, Luke or You? If you keep on fighting the Word of God, the Word of God will fight you back and humiliate you before the whole world, but if you accept it by faith and follow it humbly, will be a light to you to eternal glory. And as a seed of Abraham, could remain to be a peculiar individual to serve Him as His royal priest which the nation of Israel is chosen and called for. Remember Genesis 3:1-15 and Ezekiel 28 Adam and Eve by disobeying not only became naked (lost their glory), but also failed under the condemnation of eternal death. The devil who caused them to fail through deception, was cursed above every living beast, he being one God’s creation as an angel/spirit being, he thought the spirit being will not die, therefore, he lied to Eve you will surely not die. But now we know even the spirit beings will be condemned to death, and that is called “the second death”! Revelation 20”11-15, 21:3-8; Matthew 25:41
It’s very clear in the Torah, Bamidbar - Numbers 28:22, that there is no sin offering on Passover for the nation! The Passover lamb is not a sin offering, no matter how much Xtians want it to be! The sin offering brought by the Kohen Gadol, was an offering for himself to enter and to do his work in the Holy Temple! It was also a goat and NOT a lamb! The early anti-Semitic church fathers thought that every time a lamb or goat was sacrificed, that it was an offering for sin. Clearly, that is not always the case, and is not the case here, as it pertains to the Passover lamb. The blood of jsus has nothing to do with sin or its atonement and is first century paganism!
"God is not a man, that He should lie; neither the son of man, that He should repent. Hath He said, and shall He not do it? Or hath He spoken, and shall He not make it good?" Numbers 23:19 KJV The Messiah cannot be God, because God is not a man, period. God does not lie, nor change his mind. And always does what He says He will do.
@@youttb 90 Verses That Say: Jesus is Not God Nor the Literal Son of God ' (Matt 12:18) Since Jesus is God's servant, Jesus can not be God. The Bible says that Jesus could not do anything by himself. 'The son can do nothing by ...
@@youttb Jesus said he has a God. John 20:17. Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God. Mark 12:29. And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord: Jesus said he can do nothing. John 5:30. I can of mine own self do nothing: Jesus said only God is good. Mark 10:18. And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.
So we are looking at a CORRUPT WORLD to reveal and prove the TRUTH? Shouldn't we be looking at OUR FAITH? Shouldn't we be TRUSTING our HEAVENLY FATHER to reveal the TRUTH FROM HEAVEN ..... TO US? And THEN we can compare the TRUTH with the CORUPTION and only THEN see the DIFERENCE between these two. The scriptures was written so we can LEARN how to put our FAITH in practice. LORD GOD ALMIGHTY took care of our SALVATION already (see Isaiah 46:8-10). All we need to do is LOVE each other, and REST in GOD'S WILL. ALL glory to Lord God Almighty and his true messiah ( even if his name is Jesus, make sure is the RIGHT Jesus ACCORDING to the scriptures). Numbers 6:24-27. Revelation 22:4-5
Acts 7:15 and Acts 7:16 is Joshua 24:32 with an error in Acts 7:16 where the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Abraham but in the Jewish scripture the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Joshua in Joshua 24:32. . Acts 7:15 Then Jacob went down to Egypt, where he and our ancestors died. Acts 7:16 Their bodies were brought back to Shechem and placed in the tomb that Abraham had bought from the sons of Hamor at Shechem for a certain sum of money. . Joshua 24:32 And Joseph’s bones, which the Israelites had brought up from Egypt, were buried at Shechem in the tract of land that Jacob bought for a hundred pieces of silver from the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem.
@@samvoron1727 You are talking about physical things. At mount Sinai Lord God gave us 10 commandments to reveal to us how we can have a RELATIONSHIP with Lord God Almighty. God's kingdom is a LIVING kingdom and he is the eternal LIVING GOD. LIFE means spirit - body RELATIONSHIP. IF you are TRUE to yourself and WILLING to do God's WILL than your spirit has to be in agreement with God"s SPIRIT and if you have FAITH than you will receive at the resurection a glorified body so your resurected body will be in agreement with Lord God's LIVING BODY. That's how TRUTH works. Lord God said that he did EVERYTHING for his OWN NAME. So his own NAME would ALWAYS be HOLY. There's NOTHING we can DO to bring PERFECT GLORY to Lord God Almighty. So the only thing Lord God Almighty is requesting from us is FAITH and OBEDIENCE. Lord God Almighty did everything for us, so please tell me what is the POINT to ARGUE with each other? Do you think that Lord God is going to lose any children? You either abide in FAITH and LOVE, or God's WRATH abides on you. All glory and eternal thanks to Lord God Almighty, blessed be his NAME forever and ever.
@@springflowerblosomnorris9721 Before anyone can serve God they need to know which scriptures confirm and which scriptures contradict the Tanakh. This is what the rabbi is teaching.
@@samvoron1727 Why is so DIFFICULT for you to understand Genesis 2:7 ( the given IMAGE) and the FAITH? FAITH is what we do for God. SALVATION is what Lord God does for us. If we have FAITH and walk FAITHFULY in the given 10 commansmends than we ALWAYS put Lord God FIRST. We will not worship images made by man. We will NOT take God's name in vain. And we will FAITHFULY REST in the given SABBATH, we will FAITHFULY REST in SPIRIT ( have PEACE with Lord God Almighty), and also we will FAITHFULY REST PHYSICALLY too ( that's FAITH onto DEATH you realize this?) You can choose your options but I see the diference between people caught up in rituals working to get eternal life ( Isaiah 14: 13-14), how are you any DIFERENT? You have your own will and desires. Compared to the OPPOSITE view: it is Lord God's DESIRE to SAVE US, and all we have to do is HAVE FAITH that Lord God's PROMISES will always be FULFILLED. All glory to Lord God Almighty my heavenly Father, BLESSED be his NAME forever and ever. Numbers 6:24-27 Revelation 22:4-5
It’s very clear in the Torah, Bamidbar - Numbers 28:22, that there is no sin offering on Passover for the nation! The Passover lamb is not a sin offering, no matter how much Xtians want it to be! The sin offering brought by the Kohen Gadol, was an offering for himself to enter and to do his work in the Holy Temple! It was also a goat and NOT a lamb! The early anti-Semitic church fathers thought that every time a lamb or goat was sacrificed, that it was an offering for sin. Clearly, that is not always the case, and is not the case here, as it pertains to the Passover lamb. The blood of jsus has nothing to do with sin or its atonement and is first century paganism!
We know what the original Bible said by comparing all the variants. All of the differences have no impact on Christian theology, but for the 1% that does matter, they put both versions, either as footnotes or extra passages just in case. The New Testament alone, we have 24,000 handwritten manuscripts, and the oldest fragment was from the Gospel of John- written only 40 years after the original. The oldest completed New Testament dated back to 300 years after the originals. As for textual corruption, there are only 40 altered lines in the entire New Testament, making it 99.5% accurate. There is absolutely no evidence that the Bible has been revised, edited, or tampered with in any systematic manner. The sheer volume of biblical manuscripts makes it simple to recognize any attempt to distort God’s Word. There is no major doctrine of the Bible that is put in doubt as a result of the inconsequential differences among the manuscripts.
BELIEF IN jsus as G-D IS PAGANISM! When you come on this page and make silly comments like that it makes you appear very ignorant of Tanakh of which you are.
Acts 7:15 and Acts 7:16 is Joshua 24:32 with an error in Acts 7:16 where the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Abraham but in the Jewish scripture the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Joshua in Joshua 24:32. . Acts 7:15 Then Jacob went down to Egypt, where he and our ancestors died. Acts 7:16 Their bodies were brought back to Shechem and placed in the tomb that Abraham had bought from the sons of Hamor at Shechem for a certain sum of money. . Joshua 24:32 And Joseph’s bones, which the Israelites had brought up from Egypt, were buried at Shechem in the tract of land that Jacob bought for a hundred pieces of silver from the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem.
@@samvoron1727 Jacob was buried in the field of Machpelah, what his grandfather Abraham purchased from Ephron the Hittite (Genesis 50:13). Note: Stephen in Acts is not referring to this transaction or burial. Abraham bought the land of Sichem/Shechem/Sychem from the sons of Hamor/Emmor, and then built an altar there (Genesis 12:6-7; Acts 7:16). However, Abraham did not settle in Shechem. Consequently, ownership of this real estate reverted back to Hamor’s family. A few centuries later, Abraham’s grandson Jacob repurchased the land of Shechem from Hamor’s family (Genesis 33:18-19). Jacob’s son Joseph, and Joseph’s brethren, were buried in Shechem (Acts 7:15-16).
@@writerjmd Acts 7:15 and Acts 7:16 has copied Joshua 24:32 and made an error. Look carefully and you will see Acts copies almost word for word but made one error. Acts 7:15 and Acts 7:16 is Joshua 24:32 with an error in Acts 7:16 where the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Abraham but in the Jewish scripture the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Joshua in Joshua 24:32. . Acts 7:15 Then Jacob went down to Egypt, where he and our ancestors died. Acts 7:16 Their bodies were brought back to Shechem and placed in the tomb that Abraham had bought from the sons of Hamor at Shechem for a certain sum of money. . Here is what is copied in Acts and where the error occurs in Acts Joshua 24:32 And Joseph’s bones, which the Israelites had brought up from Egypt (is correctly copied in Acts 7:15), were buried at Shechem in the tract of land (is correctly copied in Acts 7:16) that Jacob (this is the error in Acts 7:16 which says that Abraham not Jacob) bought for a hundred pieces of silver from the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem.
Jacob repurchased the land in Joshua 24:32 meaning it is Jacob who bought it for a tomb and not Abraham. The land brought for a tomb by Abraham was in Hebron. The land brought for a tomb by Jacob was in Shechem.
@@writerjmd The error in Acts 16 is to say that Abraham made the purchase of the land however Genesis 33:18 - 33:19 says it was Jacob who camped in sight of the city of Shechem and for a hundred pieces of silver, he bought from the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem, the plot of ground where he pitched his tent. It does not mention Abraham.
Abraham did buy that parcel of land for a 100 of that type of money through his son Jacob as Levi paid tithes to the king of Salem through Abraham and The fathers were buried there as we see Joseph placed there I think.Stephen was full of the holy Ghost as he said these things as David had the Holy spirit to when he wrote the Psalms.They were carried over also could be talking about the bones of Joseph also.Luke who was moved by God did not make a mistake like this but god would make others stumble in that they do not trust Jesus.
The truth is that no one can come to Jesus unless God the Father draws them and if you are saved it is only because God had mercy on you.We are all rebels in God's eyes until we are saved.Paul is a great example of the depth of God's great salvation.He was hunting Christians when God chose to bring his salvation to him and he chose him because Paul was chosen for salvation before the world began and this is when God paid for his sins.God did the seeking to save a Paul while he was in great opposition to Jesus.May God have this mercy on you all is my hope to all who read this.
Isaiah 53:5, is found in the Hebrew & Christian Bible. Isaiah, foretold seven-hundred years prior the life of Christ what would happen and what kind of suffering he would be subject to when he did come. This is a statement of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.” “But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was on him, and by his wounds we are healed” (Isaiah 53:5).
Jews do not use the Christian Old Testament Bible because it contains wrong translations of the Hebrew. 1. Tanakh Jewish scripture says Isaiah 53:5 But he was wounded (not pierced and not killed as wrongly translated in some Christian Bibles) because of our transgressions ... . 2. Some Christian Bibles translate Isaiah 53:5 But he was pierced (the Hebrew word is wounded not pierced) because of our rebellion ... . 3. Some Christian Bibles translate Isaiah 53:5 But He was pierced (the Hebrew word is wounded not pierced) because of our transgressions (notice that he is wrongly translated with a capital letter in He) ... . 4. Some Christian Bibles translate Isaiah 53:5 He is killed (the Hebrew word is wounded not killed) because of our sins ... . 5. Some Christian Bibles translate Isaiah 53:5 But he was wounded on account of our sins ... . 6. Google Isaiah 53:5 and you will see that Christian bible translations do not agree with each other and are not the same as what is in the Hebrew text. . 7. The Hebrew word wounded in Isaiah 53:5 is different from the Hebrew word pierced or the Hebrew word killed. . Isaiah 53:5 (The nations and kings of the world who are startled surprised near the end of days in Isaiah 52:15 say to each other) “but he (the children of Israel) was wounded because of our (the nations and kings) transgressions (in Psalm 94:3-94:6), he (the children of Israel) was crushed because of our (the nations and kings) wrongdoings (in Psalm 94:5): on him (the children of Israel) was the chastisement that made us (the nations and the kings of the world) whole (because the nations and kings of the world followed the will of God who used their hands against the children of Israel so that the children of Israel might repent of their sins and return to God in 2 Samuel 7:14), and with his stripes (the suffering of the children of Israel in 2 Samuel 7:14) we (the nations and the kings of the world) were healed” (by repenting to God because this is the way God will forgive sin in Ecclesiastes 7:20, Proverbs 24:16, Ezekiel 18:22 - 18:23, Isaiah 1:18, Isaiah 55:7, Hosea 14:2 - 14:3 and Micah 6:6 - 6:8. Near the end of days when the nations and kings understand the suffering caused to the Jewish people they will feel sorrow and regret and they will repent to God and in this way the suffering of the Jewish people will heal the sins of the world when nations and kings repent and ask God to forgive their sins. Nations and kings followed the will of God who used their hands against the children of Israel so that the children of Israel might also repent of their sins and return to God in 2 Samuel 7:14. In the end of days the nations and kings will understand that “the children of Israel were wounded because of the transgressions of the nations and kings and the children of Israel were crushed because of the wrongdoings of the nations and kings” as God had decreed in 2 Samuel 7:14. Nations and kings of the world will also understand that the belief of men such as the Pharaoh and Haman and Hitler was that “on the children of Israel was the chastisement that made Pharaoh and Haman and Hitler feel whole and with his stripes which is the suffering of the children of Israel, the Pharaoh and Haman and Hitler felt like they were healed” and this idea was given to evil people in the past when the children of Israel turn away from God meaning God sometimes uses evil people to bring punishment to the children of Israel the Jewish people so that they might repent of their sins and return to God in 2 Samuel 7:14. Pharaoh and Haman and Hitler felt like what they did healed them but because they did not repent to God and died doing evil they will not be forgiven. God promises to forgive all sins to those who repent and return to good behaviour in Ecclesiastes 7:20, Proverbs 24:16, Ezekiel 18:22 - 18:23, Isaiah 1:18, Isaiah 55:7, Hosea 14:2 - 14:3 and Micah 6:6 - 6:8).
How the church put Jesus in Isaiah 53:8 and changed other verses in the Jewish scripture. The KJV (and many other Christian Bibles) wrongly translate in Isaiah 53:8 the Hebrew word “lamo” or “lamoh” meaning “them” or “they” which is plural (as the word “he” which is singular). . Isaiah 53:8 (KJV and many Christian Bibles) “… for of the transgression of my people, he (Jesus, however the Hebrew word lamo or lamoh means “they” NOT he) was stricken. . Isaiah 53:8 (Tanakh Hebrew scripture) “… for of the transgression of my people (the nations and kings of the world who are speaking say), they (the children of Israel, The Hebrew word lamo or lamoh means “they”) were stricken. . In every other verse where the Hebrew word lamo or lamoh is used Christian Bibles correctly translate this Hebrew word as “them” or “they” and never “ he” except in this one verse Isaiah 53:8 (because if it is correctly translated as” they” it would be clear that it is not about Jesus meaning the church deliberately changed the word of God meaning the church deliberately misled their followers).
Why is Isaiah 53:10 not about Jesus? 1. Isaiah 53:10 God says about His servant “if his soul acknowledges guilt” meaning this is not about Jesus because Jesus had no guilt however people of Israel had guilt meaning the servant is Israel. 2. Isaiah 53:10 God says about His servant “if his soul acknowledges guilt” then God will give him something but if Jesus is God then Jesus already is the owner of everything meaning God is not talking about Jesus meaning the servant is Israel. 3. Isaiah 53:10 God will give His servant children which shows this is about the people of the nation of Israel who need children. If Jesus is God then He needs no children because all children are already His because He created them meaning God is not talking about Jesus meaning the servant is Israel. 4. Isaiah 53:10 God will prolong the days of His servant but if Jesus is God then God has no need to prolong His days because God exists forever meaning God is not talking about Jesus meaning the servant is Israel.
Isaiah 53 is not about Jesus because none of the prophecies in the Jewish bible about the messiah who inherits the tribe of David applies to Jesus because Jesus had no biological father. The only way a Jewish son can inherit a tribe in Judaism today and 2000 years ago in the time of Jesus and 3300 years ago in the time of Moses is through your biological father. Jesus is Jewish because his mother is Jewish however Jesus inherits no tribe because Jesus has no biological father which is the only way tribe is inherited by a Jewish son.
Why is Isaiah 53:9 not about Jesus? Zephaniah 3:12 I (God) will leave among you (the Jewish people) a meek and humble people and they shall trust in the name of the Lord. . Zephaniah 3:13 The remnant (righteous) of Israel shall not do wrong, nor speak lies, neither shall a deceitful tongue be found in their mouth; for they shall eat and lie down, and none shall make them afraid. . Isaiah 1:9 Had not the (decree and mercy of the) LORD of hosts (God) left to us (the children of Israel) a very small remnant (of righteous people in Zephaniah 3:12 and Zephaniah 3:13), we would have been (destroyed) like Sodom, we would have been (destroyed) like Gomorrah. . Isaiah 53:9 "... neither was any deceit in his mouth."
@@stevesorensen7550 he was smarter than the average christian who bought into church doctrine that god was a trigod. farted out Mary's birth canal. wore a diaper sucked a pacifier. oy vey
@@james-yf9wm jesus in bible ' I tell you here today this generation shall not pass until it sees the kingdom of god come down from clouds ' false prophecy =
@@james-yf9wm naw son that dog won't hunt. Jesus clearly prophecies ' that this generation [1st century] shall not pass until it sees kingdom of god come down from clouds ' false prophecy. Muhammad gave the correct answer ' the time of the hour. is only with my lord. the creator '
YOU SPEAK AGAINST THE MOST HIGH, A HALLMARK OF THE LAST BEAST = And he will speak words against the Most High, and he will oppress the high holy ones, and he will think to change the times and the law, and they will be delivered into his hand until a time, two times, and half a time. כהוּמִלִּ֗ין לְצַ֚ד עִלָּאָה֙ (כתיב עִלָּיאָ֙) יְמַלִּ֔ל וּלְקַדִּישֵׁ֥י עֶלְיוֹנִ֖ין יְבַלֵּ֑א וְיִסְבַּ֗ר לְהַשְׁנָיָה֙ זִמְנִ֣ין וְדָ֔ת וְיִתְיַֽהֲב֣וּן בִּידֵ֔הּ עַד־עִדָּ֥ן וְעִדָּנִ֖ין וּפְלַ֥ג עִדָּֽן: 26And the judgment shall be established, and they will remove his dominion to be destroyed and annihilated until the end. כווְדִינָ֖א יִתִּ֑ב וְשָׁלְטָנֵ֣הּ יְהַעְדּ֔וּן לְהַשְׁמָדָ֥ה וּלְהֽוֹבָדָ֖ה עַד־סוֹפָֽא:
NO BARRY, BELIEF IN jsus as G-D IS PAGANISM! When you come on this page and make silly comments like that it makes you appear very ignorant of Tanakh of which you are.
WE KNOW EXACTLY WHERE OUR ARK IS and IT WILL NOT BE REVEALED UNTIL THE APPOINTED TIME! If you knew anything about our Jewish scriptures you would know what I'm talking about, but you don't.
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 muslims believe whatever commandments revealed to the previous prophetes were meant for specific group of people and for specific time. The final revelation from god, the quran is meant for all humankind, regardless of tribes, jews or non jews, cultures and skin color and will last till the end of time. I invite you to read the quran to make your judgement.
Acts 7:15 and Acts 7:16 is Joshua 24:32 with an error in Acts 7:16 where the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Abraham but in the Jewish scripture the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Joshua in Joshua 24:32. . Acts 7:15 Then Jacob went down to Egypt, where he and our ancestors died. Acts 7:16 Their bodies were brought back to Shechem and placed in the tomb that Abraham had bought from the sons of Hamor at Shechem for a certain sum of money. . Joshua 24:32 And Joseph’s bones, which the Israelites had brought up from Egypt, were buried at Shechem in the tract of land that Jacob bought for a hundred pieces of silver from the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem.
The Pagan Greco Roman Phallic Idol Jesus/yeshu is but a composite of a myriad of Greco Roman Idols; PERSEUS THE VIRTUOUS VIRGIN BORN DEMIGOD, DIONYSUS THE WATER INTO WINE MIRACLE MAKING IDOL and MITHRAS THE DYING RESURRECTING IDOL who DIES FOR THE PEOPLE, who HEALS THE LAME AND THE SICK, who RAISES THE DEAD, whose Devotees EAT OF THE FLESH AND DRINK OF THE BLOOD, who like his sidekick the Devil and his lake of fire/styx, they are are but 2 fabricated characters of Heathen Man, found only in the Greek Tall Tales/NT and Joe Smith Jr's Book of Mormon, NOT the Bible, the Torah/Tanakh.
The Pagan Greco Roman Phallic Idol Jesus/yeshu is but a composite of a myriad of Greco Roman Idols; PERSEUS THE VIRTUOUS VIRGIN BORN DEMIGOD, DIONYSUS THE WATER INTO WINE MIRACLE MAKING IDOL and MITHRAS THE DYING RESURRECTING IDOL who DIES FOR THE PEOPLE, who HEALS THE LAME AND THE SICK, who RAISES THE DEAD, whose Devotees EAT OF THE FLESH AND DRINK OF THE BLOOD, who like his sidekick the Devil and his lake of fire/styx, they are are but 2 fabricated characters of Heathen Man, found only in the Greek Tall Tales/NT and Joe Smith Jr's Book of Mormon, NOT the Bible, the Torah/Tanakh.
The Biblical Moshiach is but a mortal man of flesh and blood, he DIES FOR NO ONE, he ATONES FOR NO ONE'S SINS, he is NOT born of a Virgin, he is NOT the Son of Gd, he is NOT Gd in the flesh, he is NOT a Sacrificial Resurrecting demigod who dies for the People, as all those are PAGAN CONCEPTS derived from PAGAN MYTHS, NOT the Bible, the Torah/Tanakh. Your Sins are yours to Learn from, to Repent and to Atone for, NO one can do it for, YOU alone are responsible for your own poor choices and actions NOT anyone else!
YOU SPEAK AGAINST THE MOST HIGH, A HALLMARK OF THE LAST BEAST = And he will speak words against the Most High, and he will oppress the high holy ones, and he will think to change the times and the law, and they will be delivered into his hand until a time, two times, and half a time. כהוּמִלִּ֗ין לְצַ֚ד עִלָּאָה֙ (כתיב עִלָּיאָ֙) יְמַלִּ֔ל וּלְקַדִּישֵׁ֥י עֶלְיוֹנִ֖ין יְבַלֵּ֑א וְיִסְבַּ֗ר לְהַשְׁנָיָה֙ זִמְנִ֣ין וְדָ֔ת וְיִתְיַֽהֲב֣וּן בִּידֵ֔הּ עַד־עִדָּ֥ן וְעִדָּנִ֖ין וּפְלַ֥ג עִדָּֽן: 26And the judgment shall be established, and they will remove his dominion to be destroyed and annihilated until the end. כווְדִינָ֖א יִתִּ֑ב וְשָׁלְטָנֵ֣הּ יְהַעְדּ֔וּן לְהַשְׁמָדָ֥ה וּלְהֽוֹבָדָ֖ה עַד־סוֹפָֽא:
Rabi, listen.. you are bias. We Christian not follow Jews custom. We revival, we dont want to go back to primitive thinks. We trying to interpretate YHWS's messeges about missions to us. Not false interpretate👍🏼
It breaks my heart that you do not seem to know the teachings of the one that you claim to follow! 21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22 Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ 23 And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’ Matthew 7:21-23 You cannot ignore Moses, (Torah,) and have a relationship with Jesus, (Yeshua)
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 So, why are Jews not going out and teaching them to the Gentiles? Why are there no Rabbis that focuses on bringing the Noahide Laws to the Gentiles? Have their lights gone out? Doesn't Moses teach to feed one's dogs first? Don't the Jews believe Moses?
I am a noahide and my father is a christian. I showed Acts 7 with all of its errors to my father and he had a weak defence for each error. He actually said that Sh'kem (Nablus) is the name of the province which covers Hevron as well. I am convinced that to be a christian, one must stop thinking.
I'm in the same boat and I completely agree. Either you stop thinking or what to believe a lie
@Breastplate of Righteousness - Channel yeah but not where Abraham is buried
@Breastplate of Righteousness - Channel “16 And were carried over into Sychem, and laid in the sepulchre that Abraham bought for a sum of money of the sons of Emmor the father of Sychem.”
@Breastplate of Righteousness - Channel I’m glad to see that you are in agreement with Rabbi Tovia 🫶🏻
"As soon as the people heard the Law, they separated from Israel all those of foreign descent"
Nehemiah 13:3
Don't be so quick to become a Noahide.
Todah Rabba!
Another awesome teaching
How fortunate we are to have a knowledgeable Rabbi to open our eyes.
The blind leading the blind and they both fall into the ditch.
@@haroldensle6656 if you believe he is wrong debate him if not then 🤫
@@J3diKing How would I do that? He is too important to debate with us little people.
@@haroldensle6656 only thing I can think of is to open your own channel and dedicate it to calling out his perspective. 🤷🏼♂️
@@haroldensle6656 you can literally call into the show and talk to him. It’s pretty obvious from this video.
Thank you so much, Rabbi Singer.
Please forgive my meager donation.
I believe it was God's will, and all I have left now is bus money!
Haha!
I smoke too much.
Here is my confession:
I come from an Orthodox Christian background, nominally, with great respect for Jewish learning and tradition.
I think your insights are a treasure, and your anger well-founded - more often than not!
May you be blessed in abundance, for the premium you place on the truth.
May Our Just Teacher continue to grant you wisdom, for the benefit of curious believers like me.
P.S. - If you have not done so yet, would you mind discussing the Wedding at Cana?
I think there is an intentional parallel between the Miracle at Cana, and the Crossing of the Red Sea (or Sea of Reeds), i.e. the passage through a frankly vagina-shaped body of water that annually turns red, like wine, symbolizing the rebirth and sustenance of the Shekinah, in the Holy Spirit.
Maybe I am reading too much into this.
But besides distilling the life of Christ, this smacks of Yom Kippur - no wonder Jesus was a Goth!
On a related note:
What do you think is wrong, on a fundamental level, with the concept of Christian repentance?
The self-reflection of Christ, his emphasis on personal sacrifice and the inner struggle for atonement, guided by God's grace - these are all central to living an authentic Christian life.
We will always fall short, it is true.
And in the Stoic mindset, this necessitates repentance (as well as, perhaps, a form of perfectionism that could be crippling).
L'Chaim!
Gentiles need to keep the 7 Noahide commandments. Good luck.
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 Hvala, brate.
Repentance is not about perfection in a human being, but rather about how we humans connect with God. We need to reach out and admit our flaws and sins verbally and ask for forgiveness. That opens up a flow between the divine and the human.
Shalom Rabbi 😊
This is the 2nd important piece of religious info I've learnt today. Maybe I've been in the Twilight Zone bcoz it's the first time I've seen a photo of/ heard about the Tomb of the Patriarchs. I'm really surprised that through the centuries, nobody from the Vatican or anywhere else had said anything about this glaring error 😨 These would be people who would be more familiar with the Biblical locations. I shall read up about this amazing place. God bless you, Rabbi 😊 Happy Friday 🙏🌹
The context of Acts 7 is Stephen giving a summary of the history. Which is also what Joshua 24:32 says. The order of events in Acts 7:16 places that before going into Egypt, which is factually correct.
To presume Luke was ignorant or wrong when he was quoting Steven, and the context shows basically an ordinal summary, I would encourage you, as HaShem is gracious, be gracious as well
Well said. My comment would have been snarky, yours was gracious.
That is not the only criticism of Luke. Academic scholarship has long known that Luke has no intimate knowledge of Israel. In fact, I just saw a very interesting documentary that I believe aired on the history valley podcast. A man whose name I forget was an expert in ancient cartography. Any points out in Luke's descriptions how completely and thoroughly ignorant Luke is with respect to the interior of Israel. It's not hard to find I'll see if I can provide the site. But the point is, the author of Luke, whoever it actually was, knew some of the coastal regions of the Mediterranean indicating he might have been a trades person or have some experience in travel. But when he makes reference to geographical points of reference in the holy Land he doesn't have clue. Also, I point anyone reading this to very cogent and persuasive arguments showing that the first two chapters of Luke, which include the birth narrative, were later interpolations by a completely different writer. And there are so many proofs for that it is very difficult for any sober mind to deny it. I'm at the point now where instead of trying to explain the Christian apologists that the Tanahk is a Jewish scripture, given to the Jews and understood by the Jews and not apologists. Instead, I just refer them to folks like Bart Ehrman...
@@davidkatz341 I've seen videos discussing criticisms of Luke's Israel geography and how the criticisms are misplaced. One of the criticisms is in regards to travel up and then over in one of the regions but it actually makes sense due to the geographical features while the criticism focused on simply the cardinal directions as the crow flies.
Also, the same people who make such textual claims about the Gospels make such claims regarding the documentary hypothesis and Deutero-Isaiah. Ehrman is wrong regarding such things.
Plenty of channels from Testify to InspiringPhilosophy have thoroughly covered responding to Erhman and other critic's claims against Luke and the other wrtiers
@@voymasa7980 there are of course arguments on both sides. How do you explain passages one and two? In light of the entire tone of Luke in which he seems to adopt a holy different concept of Jesus becoming the son of God. Not the conception but rather the baptism. I'm not a Greek scholar by any means, but I can appreciate when I see the difference in writing styles explained in detail. The same person did not write the rest of Luke. It is obvious the same person who wrote the majority of Luke also wrote Acts.
Overall it is clear to anyone who understands Jewish life that the writers of the gospels were neither Jews nor have the ability to read or write Hebrew. Let me give you an analogy. Suppose you were Amish. I doubt that you are since we're having this exchange via text but suppose you were. And then you read something I wrote about Amish life. I wrote about how it was to be born Amish and to be raised Amish. I talked about Amish cultural practices and the way Amish interpretation of scripture leads them to this type of lifestyle. Further assume that I'm not Amish. Do you think that you as an Amish person would see right through me? Of course you would. So I read the 27 books of the New testament. It couldn't be more obvious. I could start with any text you like but I prefer explaining what it's like when a Jew reads the letters of Paul. You almost choke with laughter. Paul the Pharisee? Paul couldn't even read Hebrew. Now acts makes the claim that Paul was a student of Gamliel, plain absurdity because there are records of such things but you take my meaning. Paul's exegesis of the Hebrew word seed? Yikes! And Christians pick that up and run with it and never bothered a check elsewhere with the same word is used and is correctly translated by Christian translators. We could have this discussion all day.
We can move on to the gospels. I disagree that Matthew had any nefarious motive in inserting his fulfillment citations. People like Rabbi Singer for example think he did it maliciously but I do not. He was just ignorant. He couldn't read Hebrew he had it only in Greek.
We could go line by line and I realized that you don't accept that the Greek scriptures were anything other than later works by non-Jews and countries decades later hundreds of miles away. But we do. There is no way to reconcile Jewish belief with Christian belief. May I ask have you ever learned to read Hebrew?
@@davidkatz341 have you ever read the Jewish Annotated New Testament? Have you had any discussion with Messianic Jews? If it was such a laughability by Jews then there wouldn't be such writings.
I've been working on learning to read Hebrew because I find reading and understanding a text in the original or closest to original languages, helps to gain better understanding.
There are three major views on Paul's writings, including Paul against Judaism, Paul with Judaism, and Paul and Judaism (if I recall the classifications correctly). A common mistake that Christians and others make is to read Paul as Aristotelians rather than trying to understand it as though written by a Jew. That's also why many major Christian factions completely misread the Shema, including James White.
Thanks!
"As soon as the people heard the Law, they separated from Israel all those of foreign descent"
Nehemiah 13:3
Don't be so quick to become a Noahide.
@@abrahamskaria4645 Don’t mean to embarrass you by pointing out the ignorance in your post.
Nehemia 13
1. At that time they read to the people from the Book of Moses, and it was found written that no Ammonite or Moabite might ever enter the congregation of God,
2 since they did not meet Israel with bread and water, and hired Balaam against them to curse them; but our God turned the curse into a blessing.
3 When they heard the Teaching, they separated all the alien admixture from Israel.
Notice the scripture is talking about Ammonites and Moabites???
The Jewish nation loves us Noahides and welcomes us with open hearts. They’re the most honest people I’ve ever met. Beautiful Children of Gd!
You should try studying The Torah
rabbis allow jews to pray inside any mosque [monotheism] but never inside a church [trinity] that speaks volumes
Moslems don’t have a trinity, they just have Allah. Christianity ✝️ would be viewed as idolatry.
Boi le Eilat. Beautiful song. I’m sure you know it. Like good jazz, your teachings are among my favorite addictions.
Ooo, another Paul classic worth reading for comedy and occasional tears: the Apocalypse of Paul. It has a cute lake of fire 🔥, Acheron and Tartatusean angels. Yes, it so full of open references to the Greek Afterlife that it induces side-splitting laughter. Tartarus, the Greek Purgatory, and the Lake of Fire being Acheron - Nope, sorry, Paul black and icy. Just totally worth it for the laughs 😆😂🤣🤪🤭!
Surely some Christians must be familiar with this error. (I never was). What's their usual response? I always like to hear both sides of a story.
They usually run for their lives when you ask them that
@@dsadunnodudeish4535no the “error” is non existent. Otherwise christianity would have crumbled centuries ago. Stop believing your own hype w
@@SKgyebaek you underestimate the power of a cult
I want to learn to speak Hebrew, does anyone recommend any programs?
Start with Stuart Federow’s Aleph-Bet course on this channel. Learn to pronounce Hebrew words even if you don’t know them. There are plenty of Hebrew. Bible study videos on TH-cam.
Shalom Aleikhem Rav.
BARUCH HA'SHEM.
My favorite part about Jesus’ little saga is how he was like “I’m gonna send the Holy Spirit, and then there will be 50K+ sects all claiming their own interpretation of my nonsense and these sects will be filled with individuals who interpret according to their own arbitrary views and talking points”. So clearly divine!!! Lmao but seriously Christianity is a fools religion.
There is a small town in Missouri I drove through. There are not more then 5000 people in the town, yet I counted over 12 different Churches from the road. There were many more I did not see
So your non-foolish religion is to believe whatever the rabbi tells you.
@@haroldensle6656
Yes because Jews have to believe whatever a rabbi says 🙄
And you expect people to take you seriously in your claims.
@@haroldensle6656 Your knowledge of Judaism would fill a thimble. I am an EX BAPTIST , AS WAS MY UNCLE.
@@haroldensle6656 No more foolish then following a dead failed Messiah. There are thousands of Chritian denominations, so tell me which Religion is foolish.
NICE. Thanks a lot
The Greek scholars sat in Rome had very little to go on to create their Jesus character and his fictional ministry and death. They had the Septuagint which was in Greek but a poor translation of the Hebrew Bible as attested by Rabbi Singer.
Who are Rabbi Singer's two witnesses?
Every child in Israel knows where the graves of the ancestors are
Jesus is Israel
@@MagicalChemicalDaddy-tq5fl And my sister is Roma
@@RAK_EMET no your sister's Messiah is also Jesus
I am always amazed even of myself that anyone today thinks they understand the scriptures at a greater level than those who were alive 2000 plus years ago. They were alive when the Temple still existed!! Clearly there is an enemy to God in the world. He has been very active. It comes down to what the truth is, who has it and who doesn't. It stands to reason that those who are OF this world push the concept of man above God. I think it is clear who does that.
Yes it's Jesus and Christianity
@@marksimmonds2353 There is no part of Christianity in which the believer understands himself to be in a power position. Complete dependence on the redemptive work of Jesus Christ through His death, burial, and resurrection is understood to be the only way. This is God reaching out to man. Counterwise are those who believe it is within man's power to bring God to earth!! It is not by His, God's, power and will. This simply does not make sense. God is the all mighty not man. He could and can destroy the earth and all in it any time He wants. He chose not to and in the process mankind is given a choice. Salvation is by Him alone or through people!? I believe the best option is to choose Him and His way. God bless.
Perhaps you missed the part where Daniel was not told about 'some things'. By 100AD the NT was completed so the 'missing information' was available, even if written in Greek:
Da:12:4:
But thou,
O Daniel,
shut up the words,
and seal the book,
even to the time of the end:
many shall run to and fro,
and knowledge shall be increased.
@@kevingoode521 Jesus and Christianity has been the enemy of the Jewish people for the last two thousand years. Or isn't being murdered, tortured and persecuted by Christianity count as being the enemy of the Jewish people. And let's not forget about the forced conversions at the hands of Christianity. Maybe you should have a look at the history of Christianity before you say anything else. Because it certainly makes you look like a 🤡. And as a side note Jesus isn't G-d, isn't even the Messiah as you falsely claim. And isn't even the Prince of peace as you also claim. Because when I look at the state of the world today I quite clearly see that Jesus failed miserably in that regard if in fact he was the Prince of peace. In fact if you actually read the gospels you would find that your false Messiah said that he came to bring the sword and sow division. Not something a Prince of peace would do now is it.
Ummm, Christianity literally has a man who is god, not Judaism. What hypocrisy
According to a translator of Acts. says thet it seems that Avraham bought two graves one from the Efron at Hevron and one grave from children of the Hamor in Skekim. Could this also means that buying a grave is the first step to own the whole land. And in this case from the south to North. i. e The whole Israel? Or is there any another thing behind?
Can u tell me what verse in acts they are claiming is inaccurate
@@indo3052 Acts 7: 16. in Genesis 23 Avraham buy the grave at Hebron! while Acts says it was Shekem which is northern Israel. Luke follow Septaginta while Tovia follow Tanach. So by this you see the different, and Tovia is convinced that the NT-Writers has twisted and changed the Hebrew Bible. I suggested that both Shekem and Hebron could be right since Avraham could have bought an extra grave in the north. But I do not have any text to prove that.
There are no mistakes.
Joshua claims Joseph was buried in land that Jacob, Joseph’s father, bought from “the sons of Hamor the father of Shechem.” Stephen in Acts asserts Joseph’s tomb was part of the property Abraham bought from “the sons of Emmor the father of Sychem.
Jacob was buried in the field of Machpelah, what his grandfather Abraham purchased from Ephron the Hittite (Genesis 50:13). Note: Stephen in Acts is not referring to this transaction or burial.
Abraham bought the land of Sichem/Shechem/Sychem from the sons of Hamor/Emmor, and then built an altar there (Genesis 12:6-7; Acts 7:16). However, Abraham did not settle in Shechem. Consequently, ownership of this real estate reverted back to Hamor’s family.
A few centuries later, Abraham’s grandson Jacob repurchased the land of Shechem from Hamor’s family (Genesis 33:18-19). Jacob’s son Joseph, and Joseph’s brethren, were buried in Shechem (Acts 7:15-16).
I'm asking because I don't know... is it possible that the entire area was called shechem at the time that he was buried?
What is the best English tanach hard copy or app?
Long live Rabbi.
A true holy book has no mistakes....n.t. is not holy.
What's the name of the song that plays at end of all your lectures?
Adom Olam.
You're saying that Luke quoted Stephen correctly, even though Stephen made a "colossal error" that Luke's audience (and Luke obviously) would have known was a "colossal error" and this somehow makes Luke a bad historian?
Yes it does
Hi.i don't think Stephen spoke false info.ACTS 7:16 is about a tomb that Abraham brought from the sons of Ha'mor in Shechem.
The Genesis 23:17 , can not be presumed to be the same place as mentioned in ACTS 7:16.
Genesis is a field,with a cave and trees.
Stephen most likely would know about the location at Machpelah,and he was not getting Machpelah mixed up with Shechem info he gave.
Joseph,son of Jacob son of Isaac ,is claimed as being buried at I think the She'chem district area anyway.
The field,cave and tombs are from Hittites.
The Tomb in ACTS is from the sons of Ha'mor.
It seems to suggest to separate active sites.and the ACTS verse does not seem to be confirming that Abraham was buried at She'chem.ACTS 7:15 And he died,himself and our fathers, (our fathers is not highlighting Abraham).
@Asif Brett Ishmael Makki. no it is false for different reasons than you think. Acts 7 :16 says: 16 Their bodies were brought back to Shechem and placed in the tomb that Abraham had bought from the sons of Hamor at Shechem for a certain sum of money.
According to B'reshis this is false.
B'reshis 33: 19
וַיִּ֜קֶן אֶת־חֶלְקַ֣ת הַשָּׂדֶ֗ה אֲשֶׁ֤ר נָֽטָה־שָׁם֙ אׇהֳל֔וֹ מִיַּ֥ד בְּנֵֽי־חֲמ֖וֹר אֲבִ֣י שְׁכֶ֑ם בְּמֵאָ֖ה קְשִׂיטָֽה׃
The parcel of land where he pitched his tent he purchased from the kin of Hamor, Shechem’s father, for a hundred kesitahs.
Ya'akov bought this land from the sons of Hamor to pitch his tent on. This is a TOTALLY DIFFWRENT PIECE OF LAND FROM WHAT AVRAHAM BOUGHT AS A TOMB!!!
B'reshis 23:19 וְאַחֲרֵי־כֵן֩ קָבַ֨ר אַבְרָהָ֜ם אֶת־שָׂרָ֣ה אִשְׁתּ֗וֹ אֶל־מְעָרַ֞ת שְׂדֵ֧ה הַמַּכְפֵּלָ֛ה עַל־פְּנֵ֥י מַמְרֵ֖א הִ֣וא חֶבְר֑וֹן בְּאֶ֖רֶץ כְּנָֽעַן׃
And then Abraham buried his wife Sarah in the cave of the field of Machpelah, facing Mamre-now Hevron, in the land of Canaan.
Luke didn't write Luke he is saying the Author of Luke got it wrong he didn't speak to eyewitnesses cause they were all dead by the time Luke/Acts was written
What makes the Bible reliable is that the original manuscripts were never all compiled, or in the same locations, even if there were copyist errors all 99% of the manuscripts correlate.
Inerrancy was impossible as there were no dictating machines, typewriters, photocopiers or printing presses two thousand years ago.
Post-fundamentalism skeptic here:
Where in Acts is the fallacious location stated?
We don't have the Original Text of the Book of Acts, it's not extant actually!
thank you rabbi
i think what Tovia mention as 'incorrect information' used as a source would be Samaritan traditions that had the burial places in their region, he really should have mentioned that. So Acts is using a real tradition rather than making a mistake, albeit a tradition not accepted by either Jews or Christians today, yet current at the time. I realise this does not 'solve' the problem, but it shows its not so black and white. If it's true as Acts says Christianity was preached in Samaria then their traditions could easily find their way into the mix for Luke to use as a source. I watch Tovia he often makes great arguments, this is a weaker one that isn't so hard to work around in this case since there appear to have been a couple of traditions, of course picking the less orthodox one is rather what i'd have thought our Jewish friends might have expected if they feel Christianity is a little wayward
Where did you get that it’s a Samaritan tradition; When it says clearly in genesis that Jacob was buried in Hebron?
I am no scholar but someone please explain to how the Gospel of Luke was written between 63-65 when Luke 1:3 the letter addressed to most excellent Theophilus that being said Antioch seems to be the location and since Theophilus was Patriarch from 169-182 I have a major issue. I am sure that somehow they will twist this fact but really? Maybe another Theophilus he felt was excellent that lived down the road? Or maybe it is not a person but symbolic cause of name meaning. Sorry but this crap goes on and on. I just want the truth.
Judges 24: 32 "And the bones of Joseph, which the children of Israel brought up out of Egypt, buried they in Shechem, in a parcel of ground which Jacob bought of the sons of Hamor the father of Shechem for an hundred pieces of silver: and it became the inheritance of the children of Joseph."
Luke 7 is correct in that it is telling the story of the burial of Jacob, not Abraham. Luke attributes Abraham as to buying this land because the promise of the land was made by covenant from God to Abraham and when his grandson Jacob purchased the land, it is correctly attributed as if Abraham had bought it.
I am surprised a Hebrew Rabbi doesn't know this.
Luke is recounting the story Stephen told. Stephen, may have gotten some details incorrect in his narrative, but Luke, if correctly quoting the words of Stephen, tells the account correctly.
Where in Acts does it say this?
Some of the Jews affirm that they were buried in Sychem (Kuinoel). As the Scriptures do not anywhere deny that the patriarchs were buried in Sychem, it cannot be proved that Stephen was in error. There is one circumstance of strong probability to show that he was correct. At the time when this defense was delivered, "Sychem" was in the hands of the Samaritans, between whom and the Jews there was a violent hostility. Of course, the Jews would not be willing to concede that the Samaritans had the bones of their ancestors, and hence, perhaps the opinion had been maintained that they were buried in Hebron. Looks like it might've been you guys again.
Yes there are certainly torturous explanations that Christians put forward to try and explain a basic and glaring error in the text. Luke said the tomb of the patriarchs is in Shechem. It's not literary device, it's not a metaphor nor is it allegory. It is a mistake. By the way, I refer you to very persuasive arguments that Luke was an opponent of the Virgin birth theory and in fact the first two chapters of Luke were later interpolations. I've heard similar theories with respect to Mark but I don't buy those. The arguments about The book of Luke however are entirely different matter. It is as obvious and interpolation as the woman taken in adultery is in the book of John. And yet Christians don't seem to care... I would.
Baruk Hashem
This is confusing to me. Could you plypoint out exactly where the mistake and what should it be?
Acts 7:15 and Acts 7:16 has copied Joshua 24:32 and made an error.
Acts copies almost word for word Joshua 24:32 but made one error.
Acts 7:15 and Acts 7:16 is Joshua 24:32 with an error in Acts 7:16 where the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Abraham but in the Jewish scripture the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Jacob in Joshua 24:32 and in Genesis 33:18 - 33:19.
.
Here is what is copied in Acts and where the error occurs in Acts
Joshua 24:32 And Joseph’s bones, which the Israelites had brought up from Egypt (is correctly copied in Acts 7:15), were buried at Shechem in the tract of land (is correctly copied in Acts 7:16) that Jacob (this is the error in Acts 7:16 which says that Abraham not Jacob) bought for a hundred pieces of silver from the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem.
.
Acts 7:15 Then Jacob went down to Egypt, where he and our ancestors died.
Acts 7:16 Their bodies were brought back to Shechem and placed in the tomb that Abraham had bought from the sons of Hamor at Shechem for a certain sum of money.
.
In Genesis 12:6- 12:7 at Shechem God said he will give the land to his offspring.and Abraham built a small altar.(on which he offered a sacrifice as a thank you to God for the food he ate which was his custom and this is why he built so many altars during his travels).
.
In Genesis 33:18 - 33:19 Jacob camped in sight of the city of Shechem and for a hundred pieces of silver, he bought from the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem, the plot of ground where he pitched his tent.
.
Genesis 12:6- 12:7 does not say Abraham purchased land from anyone however if Jacob repurchased the land in Joshua 24:32 (which some claim but is not in the scripture) this still means that it is Jacob who bought it as land for a tomb because Abraham did not stay and he continued travelling and building altars wherever he travelled to thank God for the food he ate .
.
The land brought for a tomb by Abraham was in Hebron where Sarah (Genesis 23:19), Abraham.(Genesis 25:7 - 25:8), Isaac (Genesis 25:5 - 25:6 and Genesis 35:28 - 35:29), Isaac’s wife Rebecca and Jacob (Genesis 47:28 - 47:31) are buried.
.
The land brought by Jacob was in Shechem where his son Joseph is buried in Joshua 24:32
.
The error in Acts 7:16 is to say that Abraham made the purchase of the land however Joshua 24:32 says it was Jacob not Abraham and Genesis 33:18 - 33:19 also says it was Jacob who camped in sight of the city of Shechem and for a hundred pieces of silver, he bought from the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem, the plot of ground where he pitched his tent.
.
The error in Act 7:16 is to say Abraham purchased the land because it contradicts the Tanakh in Genesis 33:18 - 33:19 and it contradicts Joshua 24:32 which both say the land was purchased by Jacob from the sons of Hamor.
Get yourself a JPS Hebrew-English bible. Amazon has it. Then you can follow Rabbi and the correct translation.
Rabbi;simple question: how do you inherit everlasting life?
Luke wrote his 2 books in 63 CE (in Achaea, Greece), and Mark wrote his book in 65 CE (in Alexandria, Egypt)!
There's no credible historian that insists Luke/Acts was prior to Mark
@@mattmiller9809 How do they prove that Mark was written prior to Luke-Acts?
@@حامدالمهتدي So Luke (he first part of Luke Acts) has a same structure to its Gospel as Matthew and Mark. It has many of the same stories. It, and I'm going off memory here and I could be thinking about Matthew rather than Luke, straight up copies from Mark passages. He adds some things and removed somethings but at its core like 42% of Luke is found in Mark. About 1% of that is found in Luke but not Matthew. 56% of Matthew is Markian. 10% of that is found in only Luke and Matthew. There are passages found in only Luke and Matthew and not Mark but it's a lesser % of their books typically than what's unique to both Gospel and what's shared between the 3. Mark has 97% of its book used in other books. Because the books share so much in common, it's concluded that the books were based off of whichever one was first. Since Mark has 97% of it used in other Gospels, it was either first or plagiarized. I'm sure there's other reasons people think Mark was first (perhaps linguistic reasons and terms and writing styles used, perhaps Mark has earlier completed manuscripts). For whatever reason, Mark is dated first by pretty much everyone. Take Frank Turek and Normal Geisler. In their book together they tried to argue that Mark was written in like 40 or 50 CE. No scholar agrees with that dating and it's very fringe. They still placed it as the earliest Gospel. Even the ones most charitable to Christianity insist Mark is first when really it'd benefit Christians to have Matthew first (since tradition states an eyewitness wrote that one). There's a lot of historical and textual reasons why Mark is placed first.
John doesnt follow the same mold or stories for the most part as the other Gospels. This is how we know it was vastly more independent than the authors of Matthew and Luke. While I'm always down to be convinced about alternate ideas of the order of when these books were written, there's valid reasons academics and scholars agree on this order
It's worth noting that Christians apparently did used to argue Matthew came first but that's been mostly debunked and your argument was that Luke predates Mark and not that Matthew was the first. Like I said, it'd actually benefit Christians if they found out that the only alleged eyewitness written synoptic Gospel came first. Now Christians have to explain why Matthew (an eyewitness) would use Mark (not an eyewitness) as a source. Likely this proves Matthew wasn't an eyewitness
@@mattmiller9809 Luke had not copied from Mark's account, neither from the Gospel of Matthew. It's the author of the Gospel of Matthew who had copied from previous accounts.
Why? Because most NT scholars agree that Mark was the first to be written, then Matthew, then Luke, and finally John. While others are still maintaining different chronological orders to date the four canonical gospels, among them some scholars who refute the hypothesis of Marcan priority and prefer instead of it the hypothesis of Lucan priority.
Can you give the chapter and verse please
Tx you
Of what?
@@screamtoasigh9984 I've seen now it's Acts 7 16 it says Siquem instead of Hebron ?
@@delfimoliveira8883 Acts 7:15 and Acts 7:16 is Joshua 24:32 with an error in Acts 7:16 where the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Abraham but in the Jewish scripture the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Joshua in Joshua 24:32.
.
Acts 7:15 Then Jacob went down to Egypt, where he and our ancestors died.
Acts 7:16 Their bodies were brought back to Shechem and placed in the tomb that Abraham had bought from the sons of Hamor at Shechem for a certain sum of money.
.
Joshua 24:32 And Joseph’s bones, which the Israelites had brought up from Egypt, were buried at Shechem in the tract of land that Jacob bought for a hundred pieces of silver from the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem.
@@samvoron1727 tx very much Sir
Wuddup good sir
Why Jews today don't stone to dead adulterous as the Torah commands it?
Did Jesus was right to call his people hypocrets because they were stoning women instead of men and women?
Why did Jesus say "Whoever is free of sin, cast the first stone"?
Why a person is not free of sin can't stone others, according the Torah?
Jesus said the temple would be destroyed, Jesus said the kingdom would be taken away, and the survivors of the judgement scattered throughout the earth. Jesus said the city of jerusalem would be destroyed in that generations life. Jesus said the time of worshipping in an earthly temple was ending.and would soon end..where is the temple, where is the nation of israel, i only see a state given by the other nations, where are the levites? Everything jesus said was ending,,, ended...the temple has been destroyed, the sacrifices have ceased, the priesthood has been changed...Jesus is the prophet moses prophesied of...all were cut off who rejected him in his generation, The truth is more clear than the error.
Book of Luke is totally skeptic
Genesis 1:26-27 (KJV 1900): And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. 27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. let us make man in our image who is us who is we I'm certain that angles aren't as Yahweh so who be us that is in heaven who be we. This be plural. It would make more sense for you guys to have Torah studies then Christian bashing at least I would make more sense to me
Luke is precious. Paul quoting Euripides just slays me. “Pentheus, Pentheus, why do you fight against the pricks?” shifted over to over to “Paul, Paul, why do you fight against the pricks?” is classic comedy. 😆😂🤣🤪🤭 It’s such a reveal that Paul is playing games. People should really thank Luke, whose stupidity is so heartwarming.
But the NT says "Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me?" It doesn't say "Paul, Paul, why do you fight against the pricks?"
@@kamilfrompoland7 But eventually the "fight against the pricks" line is inserted somewhere in Acts. If not chapter 9 then chapter 22, 24 or 26.
@@edwardmiessner6502
But the NT says "It is hard for you to kick against the pricks." It doesn't say "Why do you fight against the pricks?"
@Edward Messiner, should be the later chapters, Paul is talking abou his conversion on the Road to Damascus. It’s the third version, each version differs from each other. Others hear a voice, suddenly they don’t. Paul falls down, everyone suddenly falls down. Since both Paul and Herod Tetrarch went to the same play by Euripides, the Tetrarch cracks a joke about almost wishing he was a Christian. Sort of expressing that he wishes he could get away
with lying 🤥 like Paul. Roman guy is not in on the joke by the way.
You are very good, Edward, right section.
There are no cacti in Israel.
Maybe it was a typo, or an auto-correct error.
Learn from Mistakes
One cannot read the scripture literally. Bible is the spiritual book. These stories or places do not even have to be localized on the map. The same applies to different characters. For example, in the Bible we have a story of Joseph whom Pharaoh made the governor of Egypt. But this is not true. The idea of a foreigner reaching the top of Egyptian society sounds unlikely and there is no archaeological or written record of a Prime Minister in Egypt called Joseph. Please, do not think that the bible is a historic book. It is to move your soul, the spirit of the Creator within you. Blessings to all of you.
🙏💚
You bring up a very interesting point.
Rabbi Singer, if a Locational Error such as the one made by Luke proves that his writings are FALSE, being that he is just a mere man?
Would that not disqualify the writings of Moses when he writes about Hashem using the wrong tense of a word when Hashem is talking about himself? Certainly, the creator of all Languages not knowing the proper tense of a word to use is a much bigger error than the wrong location mentioned by someone that is relying on information obtained from others.
Now, for the sake of Righteousness and Justice, let's apply the same weights to both of these errors equally!
HaShem Wrote His Torah BEFORE He Created His World. Moshe broke the first luchos/tablets when he saw the golden calf idol as he descended Mt Sinai. After this debacle, Moshe returned to Mt Sinai and then he wrote the second luchos when HaShem Dictated it to Moshe. EVERYTHING that is in the Tenach was either written directly by G-D or Inspired by G-D through prophecy which He Placed Into His prophets’s minds. Every single letter is from HaShem. PERIOD. And…HaShem Is Perfect…He Makes No Mistakes!
I’m a big fan of poor Luke’s errors. They gave me tons of stuff to laugh at 😆😂🤣🤪😜 when I was at Bible Camp 🎉 🎊 🎈
I invite you to read the quran. The final revelation from the one true god, with no error and contradiction.
@@HO-ui7uk Assalamu Alaikum brother,
1. Why did the first Muslims believe that the son to be sacrificed was Isaac Ishaq?
The Torah Taurat names Isaac Ishaq as the son to be sacrificed and the Quran tells the Jewish people to observe their covenant with Allah which is the Torah Taurat in Quran 2:40 and confirms what is with the Jewish people in the Torah Taurat in Quran 2:41 and says in Quran 4:136 “... whoever has no faith in … Allah's Books … then he has strayed far away (from Allah)” and in Quran 3:93 “… Say (Prophet Muhammad, to the Jews of Yathrib), "Bring the Torah Taurat here and recite it (to me as evidence) if what you say is true." meaning the Quran confirms the Torah Taurat to show that humans do not have the power to change the written word of Allah (in Quran 6:34, Quran 6:115, Quran 10:64, Quran 18:27 and Quran 30:3) which the Jews have been commanded to follow forever in the Torah Taurat by observing the Sabbath Day in all their generations in a covenant agreement made with Allah forever in the Torah Taurat which is confirmed in the Quran as proof Allah is real and as proof the Quran is truthful.
.
2. Why did later Muslims believe that the son to be sacrificed was Ishmael Ismail?
Later Muslims said that Ishmael Ismail was the only son for 13 years and therefore the Jews changed the Torah Taurat.
However when you read the Torah Taurat you will find that Ishmael Ismail and Isaac Ishaq were both living in the same house before the sacrifice and it was after Ishmael Ismail and Hagar Hajar are sent into the desert that the only son living with Abraham Ibrahim is Isaac Ishaq and this is why Allah says “Take your only son Isaac Ishaq and sacrifice him” meaning the faith in Quran 4:136 which the first Muslims had in the Torah Taurat was the correct faith meaning later Muslims did not read the Torah Taurat and believed what other people told them when they claimed the sacrifice was before the birth of Isaac Ishaq.
.
In both the Quran and Torah Taurat Isaac Ishaq is given to Prophet Abraham Ibrahim twice. The first time is by the angel of Allah with the birth of Isaac Ishaq and the second time is after the angel of Allah stops the sacrifice and gives Isaac Ishaq to Prophet Abraham Ibrahim a second time.
The name good news is always the name of Isaac Ishaq in Quran chapters 11, 15, 19, 29, 37 and 51.
.
In both the Quran and Torah Taurat Ishmael Ismail is not mentioned anywhere in Quran chapter 37 or in Torah Taurat Genesis 22 which is the story of the sacrifice.
.
In the Quran Allah only blesses Abraham Ibrahim and Isaac Ishaq in the story of the sacrifice.
Allah has left no blessing or mention of Ishmael Ismail in the story of the sacrifice because he is not in this story.
.
The Quran confirms the Torah Taurat however Satan Shaitan tests Muslims to show who believes the word of Allah was changed in the Torah Taurat in the same way Satan Shaitan tests Christians to show who believes Prophet Jesus Isa is Allah.
.
3. The story of the sacrifice in Quran chapter 37 starts in Quran chapter 19.
The story of Prophet Isaac Ishaq who is called the “Good News” son is the story of the son of Sarah and Prophet Abraham Ibrahim in Quran chapters 11, 15, 19, 29, 37 and 51.
In Quran 19:46 - 19:49 Abraham Ibrahim lived with his father and prays and when he went away Allah gave him Isaac Ishaq in Quran 19:49 meaning this is the story of the son of Sarah.
.
The story in Quran 19:46 - 19:49 which is the story of Isaac Ishaq the son of Sarah is the same story in the beginning of the story of the sacrifice in Quran 37:98 - Quran 37:101.
1. Quran 37:98 is Quran 19:46 Prophet Abraham Ibrahim is living with his father.
2. Quran 37:99 is Quran 19:47 Prophet Abraham Ibrahim prays.
3. Quran 37:100 is Quran 19:48 Prophet Abraham Ibrahim prays.
4. Quran 37:101 (We gave him the good news) is Quran 19:49 (“We gave him Isaac Ishaq”).
.
The angel of Allah gave the Good News son Prophet Isaac Ishaq twice.
The first time the angel of Allah gave Prophet Isaac Ishaq is as the Good News in Quran 37:101 which is the same as when Prophet Isaac Ishaq is given the first time in Quran 19:49.
This Good News son Prophet Isaac Ishaq is to be sacrificed in the next verse Quran 37:102.
.
The second time Allah gave Prophet Isaac Ishaq is after Allah stopped the sacrifice and gave Prophet Isaac Ishaq a second time to Prophet Abraham Ibrahim in Quran 37:112
.
The story of the sacrifice only blesses Prophet Abraham Ibrahim and Prophet Isaac Ishaq both separately and together as the father and son.
Allah has left no other blessings in the story of the sacrifice in Quran chapter 37 meaning the Quran confirms the Torah Taurat as proof no one can change the words of Allah as promised in Quran 6:34, Quran 6:115, Quran 10:64, Quran 18:27 and Quran 30:30
Quran 4:136 Koran 4:136 “... and whoever has no faith in … Allah's Books … then he has strayed far away (from Allah).”
@@HO-ui7uk Jesus did not write anything because everything Jesus taught by his mouth was already written in the Tanakh Jewish scripture meaning Jesus did not add or subtract from what is in Tanakh Jewish scripture.
.
The four Gospels are four reports about Jesus meaning Jesus never wrote anything and what he said was passed by mouth until it was written many years later.
.
There are no names on the original earliest four Gospel Injil manuscripts meaning the names Mark, Matthew, Luke and John were all added later meaning no one knows who wrote them.
Quran 5:68 says observe the Torah Taurat and the Gospel Injil and Quran 5:47 tells Christians to judge by the Gospel Injil meaning whatever in the Gospel Injil is confirmed in the Torah Taurat came from Jesus and whatever contradicts the Torah Taurat came from the unknown writers who are traditionally called Mark, Matthew, Luke and John in a test from Allah described in 1 Kings 13:14 - 13:24 teaching that the word of Allah will not change and do not believe anyone (for example Mark, Matthew, Luke and John) if in stories they claim the word of Allah has changed.
.
1. In Quran 4:157 Jesus was not killed on the cross confirms the words of Jesus 3 days after the crucifixion in Gospel of John 20:17 “I have not yet ascended to the Father (Allah, meaning I have not yet died)” ...
.
2. In Quran 4:158 Jesus was saved on the cross with sleep when his soul ascended to heaven in Quran 39:42 and the way Allah would save Jesus on the cross is foreshadowed before the time of the crucifixion in the Gospel Injil as follows.
.
Gospel of Mark 5:39 "... The child is not dead but sleeping",
Gospel of Matthew 9:24 "... For the maiden meaning the girl has not died but sleeps ..."
Gospel of Luke 8:52 "... She is not dead but sleeping."
Gospel of Luke 8:54 - 8:55 “…"Damsel meaning girl, wake up!" And her spirit returned, and she stood up at once, and he ordered that she be given something to eat. (This was proof that she was alive and not dead).
.
3. In Quran 5:75 and Quran 3:144 is the natural death of Jesus 2000 years ago which is mentioned three days after the crucifixion in Gospel of John 20:17 Jesus says to her (Mary Magdalene), "Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father (Allah, meaning I have not yet died); but go to my brothers (my disciples), and tell them: 'I am ascending to my Father (Allah, meaning Jesus will die like every human dies as proof to his people that he is human meaning do not let a miracle make you believe I am not a human like you) …”
.
4. In Quran 19:36 Jesus said “Allah is my Lord and your Lord” meaning Jesus is teaching his people that he is not Allah and this is said 3 days after the crucifixion in Gospel of John 20:17 Jesus says to her (Mary Magdalene), "Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father (Allah, meaning I have not yet died); but go to my brothers (my disciples), and tell them: 'I am ascending to my Father (to my creator Allah, meaning Jesus will die like every human dies as proof to his people that he is human meaning do not let a miracle make you believe I am more than a human like you) and your Father (to your creator Allah); to my Allah (to my Lord) and your Allah (to your Lord).”
.
5. Allah chose the Israelites and gave them the Torah Taurat and told them to observe the Sabbath Day in all their generations forever meaning Allah decreed Judaism and the Torah Taurat forever so that the following might be fulfilled.
.
a. The Torah Taurat shows which verses in the Gospel Injil confirm the Torah Taurat meaning they came from Jesus and which verses in the Gospel Injil contradict the Torah Taurat meaning they came from Mark, Matthew, Luke or John in a test described in 1 Kings 13:14 - 13:24 teaching that the word of Allah will not change and do not believe anyone who claims the word of Allah has changed.
.
b. In the same way Allah is testing Muslims in every generation in the story of the sacrifice in a test described in 1 Kings 13:14 - 13:24 teaching that the word of Allah will not change and do not believe anyone who claims the word of Allah has changed.
ZERO ERRORS HERE..
Please try to follow..
Abraham bought land in Hebron: Burial for Sarah, Abraham, Isaac then Jacob.. Gen 23..
Then, Jacob bought land in Shechem where Joseph was buried.. Josh 24
Abraham also bought land in Shechem.. Gen 12:6-7, referenced in the Acts 7:16
You actually don't have to attack Christianity to promote your stand.. Not a good sign..
NB: All above is my opinion, not to be used as extra ammunition against Christianity..
Then why would it say in acts that Jacob was actually buried in shechem is he clearly isn’t
And it never says that Abraham bought land in shechem. It says he passed by shechem
‘’Ark of thy covenant’’ its been found. 😕
With Yeshua’s blood 🩸 on thy mercy seat (left side) next to a bus station.
Tested in Israel 🇮🇱 (it’s human) and not of this world.
I type this for you, not me. 🙏
Gee, if this is wrong, maybe other things in the ‘New Testament’ aren’t true. 🥸
May be
Luke was not a historian :D It's a christian talking point with no evidence to back that up. Luke doesn't write like a historian at all :)
This man speaks of Christian Bible writers like they are not Jews ,the Christian Bible writers are Jews who lived in the time people were more religious and understand the meaning of scripture well.
A) There are all too many Jews who don’t know their Bibles and always have been. Being Jewish does not (yet!) mean that you just simply know your Bible.
B) “This man” is repeatedly demonstrating that the authors of the Christian Bible (the “New Testament”) did not, in fact, know what they were talking about. “This man” has also admitted many times that, if the Christian Bible made sense and aligned with Jewish Bible, we’d all be in church now. 2,000 years of “who’s right?” would not have existed and _should not_ have existed if the Christian Bible were actually true.
No Rabbi Singer, it is not Luke who is wrong in what is recorded in Acts 7:16; that is because, to begin with what is written in Acts chapter 7 is a direct word to word speech of Stephen, who was a Jew and as you can see from his speech with excellent knowledge of both the Torah and the Tanakh (in some cases if not better than you, at least as much as you know)! So, was Stephen wrong in quoting Acts 7:16? Well according to Genesis 33:18-20 and Joshua 24:32 he is absolutely right. That is because, Genesis 33:18-20 say “Then Jacob came safely to the city of Shechem, which is in the land of Canaan, when he came from Padan Aram; and he pitched his tent before the city. And he bought the parcel of land, where he had pitched his tent, from the children of Hamor, Shechem's father, for one hundred pieces of money. Then he erected an altar there and called it El Elohe Israel”.
And Joshua 24:32 say “The bones of Joseph, which the children of Israel had brought up out of Egypt, they buried at Shechem, in the plot of ground which Jacob had bought from the sons of Hamor the father of Shechem for one hundred pieces of silver, and which had become an inheritance of the children of Joseph. And Eleazar the son of Aaron died. They buried him in a hill belonging to Phinehas his son, which was given to him in the mountains of Ephraim”.
So, who is the ignorant about the written Word of God here, Luke or You? If you keep on fighting the Word of God, the Word of God will fight you back and humiliate you before the whole world, but if you accept it by faith and follow it humbly, will be a light to you to eternal glory. And as a seed of Abraham, could remain to be a peculiar individual to serve Him as His royal priest which the nation of Israel is chosen and called for. Remember Genesis 3:1-15 and Ezekiel 28
Adam and Eve by disobeying not only became naked (lost their glory), but also failed under the condemnation of eternal death.
The devil who caused them to fail through deception, was cursed above every living beast, he being one God’s creation as an angel/spirit being, he thought the spirit being will not die, therefore, he lied to Eve you will surely not die. But now we know even the spirit beings will be condemned to death, and that is called “the second death”! Revelation 20”11-15, 21:3-8; Matthew 25:41
It’s very clear in the Torah, Bamidbar - Numbers 28:22, that there is no sin offering on Passover for the nation! The Passover lamb is not a sin offering, no matter how much Xtians want it to be!
The sin offering brought by the Kohen Gadol, was an offering for himself to enter and to do his work in the Holy Temple! It was also a goat and NOT a lamb!
The early anti-Semitic church fathers thought that every time a lamb or goat was sacrificed, that it was an offering for sin. Clearly, that is not always the case, and is not the case here, as it pertains to the Passover lamb. The blood of jsus has nothing to do with sin or its atonement and is first century paganism!
"God is not a man, that He should lie; neither the son of man, that He should repent. Hath He said, and shall He not do it? Or hath He spoken, and shall He not make it good?" Numbers
23:19 KJV
The Messiah cannot be God, because God is not a man, period.
God does not lie, nor change his mind. And always does what He says He will do.
God is HIS presence
Tht should not lie nd repent like son of Man/ adam
@@youttb 90 Verses That Say: Jesus is Not God Nor the Literal Son of God
' (Matt 12:18) Since Jesus is God's servant, Jesus can not be God. The Bible says that Jesus could not do anything by himself. 'The son can do nothing by ...
@@ajjony4866 true .Servant with Covenant nd Light of the world Isaiah 42.
@@youttb Jesus said he has a God.
John 20:17. Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.
Mark 12:29. And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:
Jesus said he can do nothing.
John 5:30. I can of mine own self do nothing:
Jesus said only God is good.
Mark 10:18. And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.
@@ajjony4866 Father
So we are looking at a CORRUPT WORLD to reveal and prove the TRUTH?
Shouldn't we be looking at OUR FAITH?
Shouldn't we be TRUSTING our HEAVENLY FATHER to reveal the TRUTH FROM HEAVEN ..... TO US?
And THEN we can compare the TRUTH with the CORUPTION and only THEN see the DIFERENCE between these two.
The scriptures was written so we can LEARN how to put our FAITH in practice.
LORD GOD ALMIGHTY took care of our SALVATION already (see Isaiah 46:8-10).
All we need to do is LOVE each other, and REST in GOD'S WILL.
ALL glory to Lord God Almighty and his true messiah ( even if his name is Jesus, make sure is the RIGHT Jesus ACCORDING to the scriptures).
Numbers 6:24-27.
Revelation 22:4-5
Acts 7:15 and Acts 7:16 is Joshua 24:32 with an error in Acts 7:16 where the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Abraham but in the Jewish scripture the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Joshua in Joshua 24:32.
.
Acts 7:15 Then Jacob went down to Egypt, where he and our ancestors died.
Acts 7:16 Their bodies were brought back to Shechem and placed in the tomb that Abraham had bought from the sons of Hamor at Shechem for a certain sum of money.
.
Joshua 24:32 And Joseph’s bones, which the Israelites had brought up from Egypt, were buried at Shechem in the tract of land that Jacob bought for a hundred pieces of silver from the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem.
@@samvoron1727
You are talking about physical things.
At mount Sinai Lord God gave us 10 commandments to reveal to us how we can have a RELATIONSHIP with Lord God Almighty.
God's kingdom is a LIVING kingdom and he is the eternal LIVING GOD.
LIFE means spirit - body RELATIONSHIP.
IF you are TRUE to yourself and WILLING to do God's WILL than your spirit has to be in agreement with God"s SPIRIT and if you have FAITH than you will receive at the resurection a glorified body so your resurected body will be in agreement with Lord God's LIVING BODY.
That's how TRUTH works.
Lord God said that he did EVERYTHING for his OWN NAME. So his own NAME would ALWAYS be HOLY.
There's NOTHING we can DO to bring PERFECT GLORY to Lord God Almighty. So the only thing Lord God Almighty is requesting from us is FAITH and OBEDIENCE.
Lord God Almighty did everything for us, so please tell me what is the POINT to ARGUE with each other?
Do you think that Lord God is going to lose any children?
You either abide in FAITH and LOVE, or God's WRATH abides on you.
All glory and eternal thanks to Lord God Almighty, blessed be his NAME forever and ever.
@@springflowerblosomnorris9721 Before anyone can serve God they need to know which scriptures confirm and which scriptures contradict the Tanakh. This is what the rabbi is teaching.
@@samvoron1727
Why is so DIFFICULT for you to understand Genesis 2:7 ( the given IMAGE) and the FAITH?
FAITH is what we do for God.
SALVATION is what Lord God does for us.
If we have FAITH and walk FAITHFULY in the given 10 commansmends than we ALWAYS put Lord God FIRST.
We will not worship images made by man.
We will NOT take God's name in vain.
And we will FAITHFULY REST in the given SABBATH, we will FAITHFULY REST in SPIRIT ( have PEACE with Lord God Almighty), and also we will FAITHFULY REST PHYSICALLY too ( that's FAITH onto DEATH you realize this?)
You can choose your options but I see the diference between people caught up in rituals working to get eternal life ( Isaiah 14: 13-14), how are you any DIFERENT? You have your own will and desires.
Compared to the OPPOSITE view: it is Lord God's DESIRE to SAVE US, and all we have to do is HAVE FAITH that Lord God's PROMISES will always be FULFILLED.
All glory to Lord God Almighty my heavenly Father, BLESSED be his NAME forever and ever.
Numbers 6:24-27
Revelation 22:4-5
Jesus, is the Messiah.
The same could be said about Mohammad.
Exactly!
Oops!
Jesus loves you Tovia….don’t persecute your own God
God is not a man and Gentiles need to keep His 7 Noahide commandments.
It’s very clear in the Torah, Bamidbar - Numbers 28:22, that there is no sin offering on Passover for the nation! The Passover lamb is not a sin offering, no matter how much Xtians want it to be!
The sin offering brought by the Kohen Gadol, was an offering for himself to enter and to do his work in the Holy Temple! It was also a goat and NOT a lamb!
The early anti-Semitic church fathers thought that every time a lamb or goat was sacrificed, that it was an offering for sin. Clearly, that is not always the case, and is not the case here, as it pertains to the Passover lamb. The blood of jsus has nothing to do with sin or its atonement and is first century paganism!
We know what the original Bible said by comparing all the variants.
All of the differences have no impact on Christian theology, but for the 1% that does matter, they put both versions, either as footnotes or extra passages just in case.
The New Testament alone, we have 24,000 handwritten manuscripts, and the oldest fragment was from the Gospel of John- written only 40 years after the original.
The oldest completed New Testament dated back to 300 years after the originals.
As for textual corruption, there are only 40 altered lines in the entire New Testament, making it 99.5% accurate.
There is absolutely no evidence that the Bible has been revised, edited, or tampered with in any systematic manner.
The sheer volume of biblical manuscripts makes it simple to recognize any attempt to distort God’s Word.
There is no major doctrine of the Bible that is put in doubt as a result of the inconsequential differences among the manuscripts.
JESUS IS GOD 👑✝🕊
BELIEF IN jsus as G-D IS PAGANISM! When you come on this page and make silly comments like that it makes you appear very ignorant of Tanakh of which you are.
Your titles are inflammatory and are usually not even representative of what Singer even says.
Acts 7:15 and Acts 7:16 is Joshua 24:32 with an error in Acts 7:16 where the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Abraham but in the Jewish scripture the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Joshua in Joshua 24:32.
.
Acts 7:15 Then Jacob went down to Egypt, where he and our ancestors died.
Acts 7:16 Their bodies were brought back to Shechem and placed in the tomb that Abraham had bought from the sons of Hamor at Shechem for a certain sum of money.
.
Joshua 24:32 And Joseph’s bones, which the Israelites had brought up from Egypt, were buried at Shechem in the tract of land that Jacob bought for a hundred pieces of silver from the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem.
@@samvoron1727
Jacob was buried in the field of Machpelah, what his grandfather Abraham purchased from Ephron the Hittite (Genesis 50:13). Note: Stephen in Acts is not referring to this transaction or burial.
Abraham bought the land of Sichem/Shechem/Sychem from the sons of Hamor/Emmor, and then built an altar there (Genesis 12:6-7; Acts 7:16). However, Abraham did not settle in Shechem. Consequently, ownership of this real estate reverted back to Hamor’s family.
A few centuries later, Abraham’s grandson Jacob repurchased the land of Shechem from Hamor’s family (Genesis 33:18-19). Jacob’s son Joseph, and Joseph’s brethren, were buried in Shechem (Acts 7:15-16).
@@writerjmd Acts 7:15 and Acts 7:16 has copied Joshua 24:32 and made an error.
Look carefully and you will see Acts copies almost word for word but made one error.
Acts 7:15 and Acts 7:16 is Joshua 24:32 with an error in Acts 7:16 where the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Abraham but in the Jewish scripture the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Joshua in Joshua 24:32.
.
Acts 7:15 Then Jacob went down to Egypt, where he and our ancestors died.
Acts 7:16 Their bodies were brought back to Shechem and placed in the tomb that Abraham had bought from the sons of Hamor at Shechem for a certain sum of money.
.
Here is what is copied in Acts and where the error occurs in Acts
Joshua 24:32 And Joseph’s bones, which the Israelites had brought up from Egypt (is correctly copied in Acts 7:15), were buried at Shechem in the tract of land (is correctly copied in Acts 7:16) that Jacob (this is the error in Acts 7:16 which says that Abraham not Jacob) bought for a hundred pieces of silver from the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem.
Jacob repurchased the land in Joshua 24:32 meaning it is Jacob who bought it for a tomb and not Abraham.
The land brought for a tomb by Abraham was in Hebron.
The land brought for a tomb by Jacob was in Shechem.
@@writerjmd The error in Acts 16 is to say that Abraham made the purchase of the land however Genesis 33:18 - 33:19 says it was Jacob who camped in sight of the city of Shechem and for a hundred pieces of silver, he bought from the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem, the plot of ground where he pitched his tent.
It does not mention Abraham.
Abraham did buy that parcel of land for a 100 of that type of money through his son Jacob as Levi paid tithes to the king of Salem through Abraham and The fathers were buried there as we see Joseph placed there I think.Stephen was full of the holy Ghost as he said these things as David had the Holy spirit to when he wrote the Psalms.They were carried over also could be talking about the bones of Joseph also.Luke who was moved by God did not make a mistake like this but god would make others stumble in that they do not trust Jesus.
The truth is that no one can come to Jesus unless God the Father draws them and if you are saved it is only because God had mercy on you.We are all rebels in God's eyes until we are saved.Paul is a great example of the depth of God's great salvation.He was hunting Christians when God chose to bring his salvation to him and he chose him because Paul was chosen for salvation before the world began and this is when God paid for his sins.God did the seeking to save a Paul while he was in great opposition to Jesus.May God have this mercy on you all is my hope to all who read this.
Isaiah 53:5, is found in the Hebrew & Christian Bible.
Isaiah, foretold seven-hundred years prior the life of Christ what would happen and what kind of suffering he would be subject to when he did come.
This is a statement of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.”
“But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was on him, and by his wounds we are healed” (Isaiah 53:5).
Jews do not use the Christian Old Testament Bible because it contains wrong translations of the Hebrew.
1. Tanakh Jewish scripture says Isaiah 53:5 But he was wounded (not pierced and not killed as wrongly translated in some Christian Bibles) because of our transgressions ...
.
2. Some Christian Bibles translate Isaiah 53:5 But he was pierced (the Hebrew word is wounded not pierced) because of our rebellion ...
.
3. Some Christian Bibles translate Isaiah 53:5 But He was pierced (the Hebrew word is wounded not pierced) because of our transgressions (notice that he is wrongly translated with a capital letter in He) ...
.
4. Some Christian Bibles translate Isaiah 53:5 He is killed (the Hebrew word is wounded not killed) because of our sins ...
.
5. Some Christian Bibles translate Isaiah 53:5 But he was wounded on account of our sins ...
.
6. Google Isaiah 53:5 and you will see that Christian bible translations do not agree with each other and are not the same as what is in the Hebrew text.
.
7. The Hebrew word wounded in Isaiah 53:5 is different from the Hebrew word pierced or the Hebrew word killed.
.
Isaiah 53:5 (The nations and kings of the world who are startled surprised near the end of days in Isaiah 52:15 say to each other) “but he (the children of Israel) was wounded because of our (the nations and kings) transgressions (in Psalm 94:3-94:6), he (the children of Israel) was crushed because of our (the nations and kings) wrongdoings (in Psalm 94:5): on him (the children of Israel) was the chastisement that made us (the nations and the kings of the world) whole (because the nations and kings of the world followed the will of God who used their hands against the children of Israel so that the children of Israel might repent of their sins and return to God in 2 Samuel 7:14), and with his stripes (the suffering of the children of Israel in 2 Samuel 7:14) we (the nations and the kings of the world) were healed” (by repenting to God because this is the way God will forgive sin in Ecclesiastes 7:20, Proverbs 24:16, Ezekiel 18:22 - 18:23, Isaiah 1:18, Isaiah 55:7, Hosea 14:2 - 14:3 and Micah 6:6 - 6:8. Near the end of days when the nations and kings understand the suffering caused to the Jewish people they will feel sorrow and regret and they will repent to God and in this way the suffering of the Jewish people will heal the sins of the world when nations and kings repent and ask God to forgive their sins. Nations and kings followed the will of God who used their hands against the children of Israel so that the children of Israel might also repent of their sins and return to God in 2 Samuel 7:14. In the end of days the nations and kings will understand that “the children of Israel were wounded because of the transgressions of the nations and kings and the children of Israel were crushed because of the wrongdoings of the nations and kings” as God had decreed in 2 Samuel 7:14. Nations and kings of the world will also understand that the belief of men such as the Pharaoh and Haman and Hitler was that “on the children of Israel was the chastisement that made Pharaoh and Haman and Hitler feel whole and with his stripes which is the suffering of the children of Israel, the Pharaoh and Haman and Hitler felt like they were healed” and this idea was given to evil people in the past when the children of Israel turn away from God meaning God sometimes uses evil people to bring punishment to the children of Israel the Jewish people so that they might repent of their sins and return to God in 2 Samuel 7:14. Pharaoh and Haman and Hitler felt like what they did healed them but because they did not repent to God and died doing evil they will not be forgiven. God promises to forgive all sins to those who repent and return to good behaviour in Ecclesiastes 7:20, Proverbs 24:16, Ezekiel 18:22 - 18:23, Isaiah 1:18, Isaiah 55:7, Hosea 14:2 - 14:3 and Micah 6:6 - 6:8).
How the church put Jesus in Isaiah 53:8 and changed other verses in the Jewish scripture.
The KJV (and many other Christian Bibles) wrongly translate in Isaiah 53:8 the Hebrew word “lamo” or “lamoh” meaning “them” or “they” which is plural (as the word “he” which is singular).
.
Isaiah 53:8 (KJV and many Christian Bibles) “… for of the transgression of my people, he (Jesus, however the Hebrew word lamo or lamoh means “they” NOT he) was stricken.
.
Isaiah 53:8 (Tanakh Hebrew scripture) “… for of the transgression of my people (the nations and kings of the world who are speaking say), they (the children of Israel, The Hebrew word lamo or lamoh means “they”) were stricken.
.
In every other verse where the Hebrew word lamo or lamoh is used Christian Bibles correctly translate this Hebrew word as “them” or “they” and never “ he” except in this one verse Isaiah 53:8 (because if it is correctly translated as” they” it would be clear that it is not about Jesus meaning the church deliberately changed the word of God meaning the church deliberately misled their followers).
Why is Isaiah 53:10 not about Jesus?
1. Isaiah 53:10 God says about His servant “if his soul acknowledges guilt” meaning this is not about Jesus because Jesus had no guilt however people of Israel had guilt meaning the servant is Israel.
2. Isaiah 53:10 God says about His servant “if his soul acknowledges guilt” then God will give him something but if Jesus is God then Jesus already is the owner of everything meaning God is not talking about Jesus meaning the servant is Israel.
3. Isaiah 53:10 God will give His servant children which shows this is about the people of the nation of Israel who need children.
If Jesus is God then He needs no children because all children are already His because He created them meaning God is not talking about Jesus meaning the servant is Israel.
4. Isaiah 53:10 God will prolong the days of His servant but if Jesus is God then God has no need to prolong His days because God exists forever meaning God is not talking about Jesus meaning the servant is Israel.
Isaiah 53 is not about Jesus because none of the prophecies in the Jewish bible about the messiah who inherits the tribe of David applies to Jesus because Jesus had no biological father.
The only way a Jewish son can inherit a tribe in Judaism today and 2000 years ago in the time of Jesus and 3300 years ago in the time of Moses is through your biological father.
Jesus is Jewish because his mother is Jewish however Jesus inherits no tribe because Jesus has no biological father which is the only way tribe is inherited by a Jewish son.
Why is Isaiah 53:9 not about Jesus?
Zephaniah 3:12 I (God) will leave among you (the Jewish people) a meek and humble people and they shall trust in the name of the Lord.
.
Zephaniah 3:13 The remnant (righteous) of Israel shall not do wrong, nor speak lies, neither shall a deceitful tongue be found in their mouth; for they shall eat and lie down, and none shall make them afraid.
.
Isaiah 1:9 Had not the (decree and mercy of the) LORD of hosts (God) left to us (the children of Israel) a very small remnant (of righteous people in Zephaniah 3:12 and Zephaniah 3:13), we would have been (destroyed) like Sodom, we would have been (destroyed) like Gomorrah.
.
Isaiah 53:9 "... neither was any deceit in his mouth."
thomas Jefferson Paul the first corruptor of the doctrines of Jesus '
Jefferson was not that bright in significant areas.
@@stevesorensen7550 he was smarter than the average christian who bought into church doctrine that god was a trigod. farted out Mary's birth canal. wore a diaper sucked a pacifier. oy vey
@@james-yf9wm jesus in bible ' I tell you here today this generation shall not pass until it sees the kingdom of god come down from clouds ' false prophecy =
@@james-yf9wm naw son that dog won't hunt. Jesus clearly prophecies ' that this generation [1st century] shall not pass until it sees kingdom of god come down from clouds ' false prophecy. Muhammad gave the correct answer ' the time of the hour. is only with my lord. the creator '
DO NOT LISTEN TO THE EMMARELIEF VIDEO. YOU WILL WASTE 45 MINUTES FOR NOTHING.
Jesus is Lord🇹🇹🇮🇱🇺🇸...let's see the truth..take out d ark of covenant
YOU SPEAK AGAINST THE MOST HIGH, A HALLMARK OF THE LAST BEAST = And he will speak words against the Most High, and he will oppress the high holy ones, and he will think to change the times and the law, and they will be delivered into his hand until a time, two times, and half a time. כהוּמִלִּ֗ין לְצַ֚ד עִלָּאָה֙ (כתיב עִלָּיאָ֙) יְמַלִּ֔ל וּלְקַדִּישֵׁ֥י עֶלְיוֹנִ֖ין יְבַלֵּ֑א וְיִסְבַּ֗ר לְהַשְׁנָיָה֙ זִמְנִ֣ין וְדָ֔ת וְיִתְיַֽהֲב֣וּן בִּידֵ֔הּ עַד־עִדָּ֥ן וְעִדָּנִ֖ין וּפְלַ֥ג עִדָּֽן:
26And the judgment shall be established, and they will remove his dominion to be destroyed and annihilated until the end. כווְדִינָ֖א יִתִּ֑ב וְשָׁלְטָנֵ֣הּ יְהַעְדּ֔וּן לְהַשְׁמָדָ֥ה וּלְהֽוֹבָדָ֖ה עַד־סוֹפָֽא:
NO BARRY, BELIEF IN jsus as G-D IS PAGANISM! When you come on this page and make silly comments like that it makes you appear very ignorant of Tanakh of which you are.
WE KNOW EXACTLY WHERE OUR ARK IS and IT WILL NOT BE REVEALED UNTIL THE APPOINTED TIME! If you knew anything about our Jewish scriptures you would know what I'm talking about, but you don't.
Bh ‘ ✡️🇮🇱
I invite everyone here to read the quran
Already have... interesting book 📖
@@cheryldeboissiere1851 thank you for your openness. I appreciate that you've read it.
@@james-yf9wm Allah mentions alot about the jews and the christians in the quran. I invite you to read with open heart and mind.
@@HO-ui7uk Keep the 7 Noahide commandments and leave Jews alone.
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 muslims believe whatever commandments revealed to the previous prophetes were meant for specific group of people and for specific time. The final revelation from god, the quran is meant for all humankind, regardless of tribes, jews or non jews, cultures and skin color and will last till the end of time. I invite you to read the quran to make your judgement.
Yeshua is the most popular and beloved Jewish Rabbi of all time!
Acts 7:15 and Acts 7:16 is Joshua 24:32 with an error in Acts 7:16 where the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Abraham but in the Jewish scripture the purchase from the sons of Hamor at Shechem was made by Joshua in Joshua 24:32.
.
Acts 7:15 Then Jacob went down to Egypt, where he and our ancestors died.
Acts 7:16 Their bodies were brought back to Shechem and placed in the tomb that Abraham had bought from the sons of Hamor at Shechem for a certain sum of money.
.
Joshua 24:32 And Joseph’s bones, which the Israelites had brought up from Egypt, were buried at Shechem in the tract of land that Jacob bought for a hundred pieces of silver from the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem.
i would argue moses is the most beloved rabbi of all time as he is revered by all Abrahamic faiths.
@@JesusisaMuslim but he was the Messiah
The Pagan Greco Roman Phallic Idol Jesus/yeshu is but a composite of a myriad of Greco Roman Idols; PERSEUS THE VIRTUOUS VIRGIN BORN DEMIGOD, DIONYSUS THE WATER INTO WINE MIRACLE MAKING IDOL and MITHRAS THE DYING RESURRECTING IDOL who DIES FOR THE PEOPLE, who HEALS THE LAME AND THE SICK, who RAISES THE DEAD, whose Devotees EAT OF THE FLESH AND DRINK OF THE BLOOD, who like his sidekick the Devil and his lake of fire/styx, they are are but 2 fabricated characters of Heathen Man, found only in the Greek Tall Tales/NT and Joe Smith Jr's Book of Mormon, NOT the Bible, the Torah/Tanakh.
@@JesusisaMuslim yu forgot? Esa is Muslim nd Jesus is Jewish .
Both r different
Yea and the name of jesuschrist is the 4 letter jeje
God is not a man.
The Pagan Greco Roman Phallic Idol Jesus/yeshu is but a composite of a myriad of Greco Roman Idols; PERSEUS THE VIRTUOUS VIRGIN BORN DEMIGOD, DIONYSUS THE WATER INTO WINE MIRACLE MAKING IDOL and MITHRAS THE DYING RESURRECTING IDOL who DIES FOR THE PEOPLE, who HEALS THE LAME AND THE SICK, who RAISES THE DEAD, whose Devotees EAT OF THE FLESH AND DRINK OF THE BLOOD, who like his sidekick the Devil and his lake of fire/styx, they are are but 2 fabricated characters of Heathen Man, found only in the Greek Tall Tales/NT and Joe Smith Jr's Book of Mormon, NOT the Bible, the Torah/Tanakh.
The Biblical Moshiach is but a mortal man of flesh and blood, he DIES FOR NO ONE, he ATONES FOR NO ONE'S SINS, he is NOT born of a Virgin, he is NOT the Son of Gd, he is NOT Gd in the flesh, he is NOT a Sacrificial Resurrecting demigod who dies for the People, as all those are PAGAN CONCEPTS derived from PAGAN MYTHS, NOT the Bible, the Torah/Tanakh. Your Sins are yours to Learn from, to Repent and to Atone for, NO one can do it for, YOU alone are responsible for your own poor choices and actions NOT anyone else!
YOU SPEAK AGAINST THE MOST HIGH, A HALLMARK OF THE LAST BEAST = And he will speak words against the Most High, and he will oppress the high holy ones, and he will think to change the times and the law, and they will be delivered into his hand until a time, two times, and half a time. כהוּמִלִּ֗ין לְצַ֚ד עִלָּאָה֙ (כתיב עִלָּיאָ֙) יְמַלִּ֔ל וּלְקַדִּישֵׁ֥י עֶלְיוֹנִ֖ין יְבַלֵּ֑א וְיִסְבַּ֗ר לְהַשְׁנָיָה֙ זִמְנִ֣ין וְדָ֔ת וְיִתְיַֽהֲב֣וּן בִּידֵ֔הּ עַד־עִדָּ֥ן וְעִדָּנִ֖ין וּפְלַ֥ג עִדָּֽן:
26And the judgment shall be established, and they will remove his dominion to be destroyed and annihilated until the end. כווְדִינָ֖א יִתִּ֑ב וְשָׁלְטָנֵ֣הּ יְהַעְדּ֔וּן לְהַשְׁמָדָ֥ה וּלְהֽוֹבָדָ֖ה עַד־סוֹפָֽא:
@@paulawallace8784 youre confuse the (beast =goberment = satan) jesuscrihst is the son of God
Rabi, listen.. you are bias. We Christian not follow Jews custom. We revival, we dont want to go back to primitive thinks. We trying to interpretate YHWS's messeges about missions to us. Not false interpretate👍🏼
It breaks my heart that you do not seem to know the teachings of the one that you claim to follow!
21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22 Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ 23 And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’ Matthew 7:21-23
You cannot ignore Moses, (Torah,) and have a relationship with Jesus, (Yeshua)
Gentiles need to keep the 7 Noahide commandments.
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 So, why are Jews not going out and teaching them to the Gentiles? Why are there no Rabbis that focuses on bringing the Noahide Laws to the Gentiles? Have their lights gone out?
Doesn't Moses teach to feed one's dogs first? Don't the Jews believe Moses?
@@franzbuhlmann1099 Many Jews teach the Noahide laws. Feel free to lose the attitude.
Jesus is the Son of Jehovah and finally establish Jehovas victory in Jerusalem which will be under AC