The Hard Problem finally makes sense. Mark is amazing in that he can elucidate the complexities of these concerns. It's easy to create our subjective circumstances that parallel his entire lecture. This is exciting!
this lecture is one of the most amazing lectures I've ever seen. thank you. in my view, we will never learn the real mechanism of consciousness though in that quest we are going to find something else astonishing and practically useful
It seems reasonable to say the most preliminary consciousness is feelings. However, we are able to be conscious ofl almost every single thought we have. The complexity of being conscious of thoughts seems to be dramatically bigger than that of hunger. It's almost impossible to achieve it without the help of cognition.
At the heart of the informational formation and development of matter: perhaps controlled by a program - from fractals with samples of standing waves from quantum membranes and coding. (+ --) =1, (+ - - + или - + + -)=0 и (-- +)=1 We get a module from the quantum "rosebud" (director with a script for generating specific quantum fields). Where the free volume of quantum membranes becomes the carrier and repository of information for living organisms in the brain and seeds, consisting of many - quantum "rosebuds". This gives us an idea that some information about the structure of the Universe is initially introduced into all brains and seeds, and the other part of information, through feelings and exchanges with virtual (cosmos, universe) particles entering the brain, is processed and stored by information.
After 56 minutes of listening I realised that I didn't learn one new scientific information. I hope to read his books. Why should neuroscientist waste time, money and effort studying ill defined philosophical ideas when we aren't able to solve serious problems such as schizophrenia, autism, alzheimers or even tinnitus. Who cares what's consciousness if it's not something we need to treat.
Saying there's a "mechanism" implies that there's an observable property which the mechanism produces or generates. It implies a causal link. That's not dual aspect monism. It's materialism, and since consciousness, feelings, etc are not scientifically observable properties of anything (including brains), there can be no mechanism for generating them. So you're back to the hard problem and you haven't explained anything.
It's interesting how your consciousness drives you to play silly semantics games when we all know that the term "mechanism" wasn't used in the strictest sense here.
![หมานแต่ผัวเขา - แสตมป์ โตเกียวมิวสิค [ OFFICIAL MUSIC VIDEO ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/m0g1TSBJPgo/mqdefault.jpg)
how has this so few clicks and one dislike? prof. solms is a friggin genius
Professor Solms is an absolute genius!
The Hard Problem finally makes sense. Mark is amazing in that he can elucidate the complexities of these concerns. It's easy to create our subjective circumstances that parallel his entire lecture. This is exciting!
A brilliant thinker, researcher, writer and speaker. Thank you Prof. Solms.
Brilliant... Just engaging. I always follow Prof.Solms lecture & speeches. Always simplified excellent speach.
this lecture is one of the most amazing lectures I've ever seen. thank you.
in my view, we will never learn the real mechanism of consciousness though in that quest we are going to find something else astonishing and practically useful
What something astonishing do you think?
Omg my fav prof
It seems reasonable to say the most preliminary consciousness is feelings. However, we are able to be conscious ofl almost every single thought we have. The complexity of being conscious of thoughts seems to be dramatically bigger than that of hunger. It's almost impossible to achieve it without the help of cognition.
At the heart of the informational formation and development of matter: perhaps controlled by a program - from fractals with samples of standing waves from quantum membranes and coding.
(+ --) =1, (+ - - + или - + + -)=0 и (-- +)=1
We get a module from the quantum "rosebud" (director with a script for generating specific quantum fields). Where the free volume of quantum membranes becomes the carrier and repository of information for living organisms in the brain and seeds, consisting of many - quantum "rosebuds". This gives us an idea that some information about the structure of the Universe is initially introduced into all brains and seeds, and the other part of information, through feelings and exchanges with virtual (cosmos, universe) particles entering the brain, is processed and stored by information.
👍🏻❤
6 dudes have disliked the work to this moment. guess they're hard bone Freudian psychiatrists. 🙄)
Interesting but took a v while to get to the point.
After 56 minutes of listening I realised that I didn't learn one new scientific information. I hope to read his books.
Why should neuroscientist waste time, money and effort studying ill defined philosophical ideas when we aren't able to solve serious problems such as schizophrenia, autism, alzheimers or even tinnitus.
Who cares what's consciousness if it's not something we need to treat.
Saying there's a "mechanism" implies that there's an observable property which the mechanism produces or generates. It implies a causal link. That's not dual aspect monism. It's materialism, and since consciousness, feelings, etc are not scientifically observable properties of anything (including brains), there can be no mechanism for generating them. So you're back to the hard problem and you haven't explained anything.
It's interesting how your consciousness drives you to play silly semantics games when we all know that the term "mechanism" wasn't used in the strictest sense here.
@@esahm373 You need to be more specific. I don't think you know what you're talking about.
@@jeffwunder Oh, Mr Super Smart himself? I'm sure you got the message.