Yes, beware indeed. Should NZ Labour win this year's election, kiwis will be paying unelected tribal elites for our water supply. Just one example of an agenda that has been unchecked for too long. Nip it in the bud now Australia.
If you believed “The Voice” was a good thing you need psychiatric help. Aboriginals have 11 voices currently, we don’t need people like Lidiot Thorpe and Linda Burnie having more power than they already have. I decided to vote NO the moment it was announced.
This is the battle for Australian democracy. Australians are being lulled by government and left-wing media organisations into voting YES. We must awaken Australians to vote NO.
Frankie,your right Frankie this is his way of getting a republic in the future. And unless people wake up to what he is doing then this country is DOOMED.
It feels like the entire world is heading toward something destructive and that it's been carefully planned all along. I've been trying to pinpoint it. I think it might have been during the time when both parents were starting to be out in the workforce, the cost of living became geared with two incomes so there was no going back, and children were being turned over to teachers and social workers to raise. Seems like someone decided to capitalize on this because it looks like so much of the ideology is being taught at all levels of education. I've also noticed a disconcerted effort to stop parents from even knowing what is going on in the schools. Idk...it's just an observation.
I believe that is very very real, you hit the nail on the head. Take the time to see what your offspring are being 'taught' in schools and universities: there's a LOT of ideology being inserted wherever an opening presents itself. Professors who call Australia Day 'Invasion Day'; references to 'genocide' (incorrect), Terra Nullius (incorrect), 'stolen' land (never owned in the first place) - the list goes on. I shudder to think what else the educators are opining about; transgenderism, racism, all the other '-sms' we are saddled with in this modern mixed-up world .
The voice of delusional insanity permeates the current government. The energy problems in Europe were ignored and the profound insanity of Net Zero was doubled down on. The current government is devoid of common sense and appears to be incapable of recognising dangerous and destructive popular delusions.
We don't vote the voice to represent the people of australia. We vote for the government to represent us. Why would anyone in any country want an unelected group able to make decisions over the elected government. Madness.
Just look at the UN, WEF and the WHO, they are telling our government what to do. Yes unelected officials telling our Government what to do. The so called white working population of Australia are already being discriminated at by working and trying to better themselves, as this other mob and illegal immigrants get every thing given to them housing , medical, childcare, own medical centres, own childcare centres, own legal aid, the list goes on. As they don't have to PROVE their links to the Aboriginal DNA. But! One nation one flag and vote NO.
I have indigenous ancestry & this has sounded weird to me from the outset . I'm Australian , I vote , celebrate Australia Day & pay taxes . I'm sick of the sooks that live in the past , get over it & get a job .
The real reason why the Labor Party are pursuing a Voice referendum. The Australian Labor Party in promoting its “YES” vote for a voice to parliament to have the Constitution changed by referendum. The Labor Party is not being open and truthful as to the real reason it is conducting this referendum. In 1990, Federal Politician Kim Beasley made a statement in response to Senator Button's question in the Australian Federal Parliament about whether there should be a republic. His reply was: Kim Beasley Quote: "The United Nations has given the Federal Government a mandate of ownership for housing, farms, property and business to government control once the REPUBLIC has been proclaimed." The comment by Kim Beasley in parliament back in 1990 should be ringing alarm bells. The United Nations is the NWO in waiting for a one world government. The current push by the Labor Party for the ‘Voice’ referendum is the single most important part of their plan, which is to include the 'ORIGINAL' Men, Women and children of this Country (Indigenous people) into the Commonwealth Constitution because, at the moment they have 'NO CONTRACT' with the 'ORIGINAL' Men, Women and children of this Country. Because there is ‘No Contract’ with the Indigenous people of Australia, a republic would not be achieved because the ‘ORIGINAL’ Men, Women and children of this country are the lawful land owners and the government would be unable to take control over ownership of housing, farms, property and business, thus thwarting its secretive push for a totalitarian republic where you would own nothing and be happy. This plan as you can see was already underway back in 1990. Every State in Australia has already sold off the Lands and Title Office, your original titles have been destroyed. The value of your property is in the TITLE. All properties certificate of title has been digitised and this is not a lawful proof of historical ownership. Say ‘NO’ to the Voice and say ‘NO’
It was founded on Apartheid . . in fact the White Australia policy was one of the systems that the South African model was based on . . . Electing an organised advisory body to bridge the gap . . . is a hell of lot better than the continual compensation model the Australia tax payer has been having for the last 100 or so years . . If we arent going to move this forward whats the alternative??
@@smedleyfarnsworth263 Please tell me you are not seriously suggesting that we have the same political conditions in Australiain in 2023 . . than Nazi germany in the 1930s? . . . Just say no is not how anyone moves forward . . . the voice is an advisory body . . it is NOT apartheid . . it does not restrict any races right to live in this country at all. What in the world are you talking about?
Subject: Voice to Parliament Follow this and you will clearly understand the "Voice" What if a waiter at a Chinese restaurant explained the menu to Linda Burney (Indigenous Australians Minister) in the manner she responds to questions about the voice model? Waiter: Good evening and welcome. I’ll be taking your order. Burney: Thank you. Could I please have the prawn dumplings to begin with, followed by the Mongolian lamb and… Waiter: Sorry to interrupt, but we have revised our ordering process. This is our new menu. (Hands leather-bound folder to Burney) Burney: (Opens folder, revealing only a single page) There must be a mistake. Where are the dishes? Waiter: Look under the heading. Burney: The heading says ‘food’. There’s nothing listed underneath. Waiter: It’s what we call a principle-based menu. I’ll put you down for food for one, shall I? Burney: I’m sorry, but is this a joke? Waiter: I can assure you this new menu will be to your liking. The food will be delicious. It will nourish. It will enrich. It will bring diners together. Burney: Look, this doesn’t have to be a complex question. What dishes are you offering? Waiter: You don’t like the new menu? Burney: How can I like it when I know nothing about it? Waiter: Of course you will like it. The food is delicious. It nourishes. It enriches. It will bring diners together. Burney: So you keep saying. But how do I know what I’d be getting? Waiter: There is a wealth of information available on Chinese cuisine, which you can read for yourself. I suggest you start with ‘Classic Chinese Dishes’ by T. Calma & M. Langton. Burney: This restaurant endorses that book? Waiter: No. Burney: But nonetheless this restaurant serves the dishes contained in that book? Waiter: I didn’t say that. Burney: Then what is the point of reading it? Waiter: It will help you understand that the food we serve is delicious. It will nourish. It will enrich. It will bring - Burney: Will you stop saying that! If you can’t answer simple questions, then forget it. You’re not getting my business. Waiter: I urge you not to be divisive. After all, the Asian owners of this restaurant have generously extended their hand and asked you to walk with them on this journey. You don’t want to be associated with the xenophobes, do you? Burney: That’s preposterous! And by the way, you don’t even list prices on the menu. What’s this going to cost me? Waiter: It’s not our policy to reveal our prices upfront. But don’t worry, you’ll find out - eventually! Please share this with another ten people….
I love it...and just when the government has decided we're all mugs. As for Burney, I like it best when she moves her mouth but the ventriloquist doesn't let any words come out
ANY law or arrangement that provides additional rights for one group over another, BASED ON RACE, is by definition RACIST. Australias aboriginal people already have the same "voice" as all other Australians, it's called a VOTE. As Nelson Mandela once said,: "I detest racialism because it is barbaric, whether it comes from a black man or a white man." Well said Mr. President.
What an absolute disgrace our government is. Say NO to this, ‘voice madness’!! What an absolute joke we have become here in Australia. We supposed to, ‘sing with ‘one voice’ I am, you are, we are Australians’. Wake up Australia.😠🤷🙏🙏
Dear oh dear, "the government" isn't our government, it's a foreign corporate body masquerading as government. Registered as a company in the Us-Sec (United States Security Commission) so it's not even Australian, it only has Australians as employees of the company in charge of Australian affairs, but dictated too by US board of directors.
@@SharonNewman-dd6gq Hi Sharen. Here we have another example of Aliens in our country😠?!. IF they were Australian's?. They would not need to translate to english?!. They would know what Psychos, means & how many retards are in our goverment😠.
Prof. martia langdon was a lecturer at my university. She was extremely angry , and divisive in her lectures and basically blamed everything on colonisation ,( white men) but refused to acknowledge any advancement in Australian society from pre colonisation.To get good marks you had to parrot the far left ideological doctrine that was presented.Any argument or diversion away was marked down. She is smart but an angry zealot, and is positioning herself as a powerful figure in this unelected body.
I've been watching her over the years, and I agree.. yes.....she's angry, bitter and twisted, and should NEVER hold ANY reigns of power over the people. I'd hate to come across her in a dark alley.
Interesting but not surprising that her students had to agree with her opinions in order to pass. "Come to university and learn how to think for yourself".
Won't admit that her people's culture is at least thirty thousand years out of date, nor that her people's numbers were already in decline for at least 500 years before european colonisation.
It is scary to think that at present a majority of Australians are in favour of the voice. All the pitfalls of the voice need to be exposed in the lead up to the referendum. Making Aboriginals superior to the other 97% of the population is the most ridiculous proposal I've ever heard and a form of discrimination. We haven't even defined what an Aboriginal is. If you are even only 7% Aboriginal and Scandinavian looking, you still count as Aboriginal even though 93% of you isn't. Impose a 50% minimum blood quantum requirement and see the numbers dwindle to next to nothing. There are a lot of opportunists who identify as Aboriginal these days.
@@garynewton1263 Your inner circle is obviously not a reliable source of how Australia thinks and you are totally underestimating how woke this country has become. If polls are to be believed, only WA and Qld will vote it down with a 56% overall YES vote. The only hope is for NSW to also vote it down as well, but that isn't looking likely. The other states are guaranteed to vote YES. People have their eyes shut to the possible ramifications of the Voice to Parliament. Government will be extorted into making huge concessions at the expense of 97% of the population, but most people are totally ignorant about that.
We are misled about everything. Labor is treating us like mugs. Albo promised not to do deals with the greens and so far, he's done 2 deals with them. He never mentioned this enshrined voice or his IR reforms. Labor have proven who they are and who they serve.
@@ianenglish123 If we allow all the virtue signalers out there to win this thing now, we're all be losers in the long run. If this ever gets written permanently into the nation's constitution, Australia's democracy will be a joke forever more.
@@ianenglish123 thats interesting. Can you help me understand why the Voice will help unify all Australians? Or if that is not its purpose, what will it do to assist Australia?
@@echelon2k8 funny but Australia is one of the few developed countries that doesn't recognise its indigenous culture or cultural divisions, except perhaps China. For two many years we've trashed the aboriginal culture, Rio Tinto is a classic example.
One Nation does not collude with the Climate Delusion, the Energy Transition Delusion, the Nuclear Power is Unsafe Delusion nor the Aboriginal Nation Delusion. Muttonhead Dutton needs to grow a spine and call out these ridiculous and destructive popular delusions.
I rarely agree with Bolt but I do think the Voice in the constitution is just madness. We’ve been told that it will only effect policies that effect indigenous people but as indigenous people are Australian People that live in the community there are no issues that do not effect them. Indigenous people don’t live in a separate country. Further the government is trying to quieten debate on this issue by not funding marketing. This is just crazy. Just because someone doesn’t agree with the voice doesn’t mean they are racists, in fact quite the opposite in my view. Having policies that treat different races differently is discrimination. So why we actively pursuit discriminatory policy in an attempt to find equality has always puzzled me. Then permanently embedding discriminatory policy permanently into the Australian constitution is madness in my opinion.
Of course it is madness. A vanity project for Albo, with a ready entourage of Blaktivists to bolster up his, and their own, egos. The term 'racist' should be expunged from the Australian vocabulary, by law. It seems to be just a go-to, free-pass kind of meaningless terminology that is immediately resorted to, to shut down anyone in opposition. Perhaps we could have a referendum on that . . .
They aren't interested in giving useful advice, they are concerned with "making decisions". They want to be in charge of decision making. They want to tell everybody how to behave and live. They want obediance.
The ularoo meeting turned out a no go as they could not agree yet they say they did also left a lot of mobs out of discussion we do not want a minor group telling us what to do say or almost think in WA madness has taken over already with the land Aboriginal council no able to tell farmers and almost every one they must ask permission to attend anything on there property will anything get done crops food roads trees planted etc and watch them try to get rent from home owners who is going to get all the money involved in this crazy business business?? Money from WA will be very low for the gov state and feds their plan our disaster.
Your mother should never have supported land rights either. It was just another divisive action that should not have happened. It is one of the reasons we will not be one people for the foreseeable future. People in the aboriginal community are still claiming land and charging other Australians to use it once they are handed it. Your mother helped create a corrupt welfare based system that is constantly abused for advantage by people with nefarious and self serving agendas. A system that does very little other then demand. All her good intentions up in smoke. Is she actually aware of how much land has freely been given to the aboriginals since land rights were achieved? She might be shock to know how much a poofteenth of the Australian population has been given by virtue signalling politicians to the aboriginals to this day. Not to mention the copious amounts of Australian taxpayers money given. All to be mismanaged and siphoned off by bad actors. She might also be interested in who is gaining benefit and who is just neglect within these very community by their own people. The whole thing is disgusting and purely corrupt.
The Australian government has never cared about any people in Australia and all they seek is the division of people. I am sick of our media and government costantly taunting the people of Australia and dastroying the original inhabitants culture. I think it all comes down to freedom and respect which doesn't exist in Australia. Instead they choose to intimidate and divide consantly and then tell us they are helping. I will vote no as well. Thanks for your comment.
@@georgemav7 The problem is not only with the government. Many aboriginals and the cling-ons that leech from them are hurting themselves and other Australians with their divisive actions. They continually help sew the seeds of division for their own benefit under the fake banner of reconciliation and aboriginal rights. If you really looked into it you would know they constantly mistreat their own people. Like the government many only care about what they can gain for themselves from it. You can only stop what is occurring in Australia and unite the Australia people if self serving bad actors, both aboriginal and not, stop virtue signalling, playing the victim and sponging off other Australians for their own enrichment. People need to stop putting out their hands for a free ride through life. We need to reset the clock. No one alive today can claim they are owed anything for what happen to others of their ancestry. It never happened to them so they don't need reconciliation for it and I like all Australians alive today never wronged them or their ancestors. That applies to all races and any past so called crime people claim a need to be placated and compensated for. It is pure greed and entitlement. I wish I was treated as poorly as many of these victims think they are. I would be a lot better off. The government is not destroying the culture of aboriginals. If anything they spending copious amounts of taxpayer money to preserve it. Also they are not the original inhabitants. The original inhabitants are long dead. Some at the hands of the current aboriginals' ancestors. If you want to look at it through the lens of woke activism they probably owe their descendants something if any are left to be found. The truth is I, like many Australians alive today, am indigenous and aboriginal because of being born here. And that is the only way besides legal immigration that it should be looked at. It should not be decided by ethnicity, colour, perceived social standing nor victim status which are the only categories that seem to matter these days.
why do you want land rights,,you cant prove you own it. besides,,if the british didnt colonise aus.. there would be no blacks..think yourself lucky, you get an education, house, job,shirt, dole, ect..you get more than we do..& the refugee,s from indonesia, africa, get more than both of us.. ive said for yrs,, live as we do,,or go find a tree.. no ifs buts gray area.. you hate the british,,??,,hell,, weve been invaded hundreds of times.. your not alone.. as to refugee,s,,id give them a gun & send them back.. the aus navy used to sink them,,before the goodi goodi,s came about.. they wont fight for aus..
This is pretty frightening. Seems to aim for two classes of Australian enshrined via being pushed into a referendum on the issue. Some Australians, are to be elevated in power and importance, because of a perceived historical debt, that now must be paid back by all modern Australians. Who ever heard of the fact that historical guilt is just that, history, and the marxist view of children paying for the "crimes" of their parents and grandparents or vice versa is something taken straight from the North Korea playbook. My family only arrived in 1975, as migrants escaping the Irish troubles in Belfast. Why in heavens name are we being made racially inferior somehow with enforced and inherited guilt for something that was terrible at the time, but like what was done to the Irish, is just something we need to move on from...I do not accept Aboriginals or any other minority from having rights, primacy or controls over me or any other citizen. I do agree we need to do better than what has been the case, but that is a matter for policy and not legislation. My question too is about priority - as this is all before we have tackled the core issue post-Covid that affects all of us- which is a bill of rights to stop the abuses of power applied at State and national level to "save us" from Covid or any other 'national emergency' that governments decide to declare without independent court sanctioned overview to balance the powers out.
Quite right. Interesting as you say that legislation enabling governments to use our police to use force to achieve compliance remains intact. Where's our voice?
The less detail the Government provides, the more we should be skeptical of what it means for the country. I wouldn't sign ANY contract without knowing WHAT it is about. A BIG NO from me.
in Canada, the constitution has been re-written in 1982 by Trudeau's father (then Prime minister), when they did re-write it they negotiated with the provinces to make amendments, it lasted a few weeks and everyone agreed so it looked, so the next day when it was time for signing it all in, Some provinces had decided to CHANGE the text of the constitution without telling One province, Quebec, so at his arrival in Ottawa the morning of the signature, the prime Minister of Quebec was told that the text had been changed without telling him, he then decided not to sign it, we call the Night previous to the signature: "the night of the long knives". Trudeau then said, no problem we will negotiate something after and we will make sure to include Quebec into the constitution, BUT now to make ANY changes to the constitution, they need to have 100% of the votes in favour of the change instead of the 75% before, they tried twice to include Quebec in the constitution and they failed twice as ONE PERSON was not Ok with it, ONE PERSON disagreed, so as a Quebecer I am not Canadian on paper because the rest of Canada changed their mind without asking us first and they made sure it would be impossible in the future as well. Don't let that happen to you Australia.
Well, I did not need warning, I knew from day one that this is the aim. No activist would want a Voice that does't need to be listened to. Been telling everyone who listens that changing the constitution to allow legal racism is madness of the highest order
The VOICE is just a distraction away from their main TREASON; what will the LNP do when the Government pushes to vote yes to be totally controlled by the "World Health Organisation” total authority during their next PLANNED-DEMIC, whatever they choose it to be? I’m saddened to watch the destruction of our hard-won freedoms by the millions who died so our democracy could survive. BUT soon, because of the 45 years of cowardly politician TRAITORS agreeing to the UN Lima agreement and all UN agenda agreements since then. The LABOR and LNP will sign over Australia’s sovereignty once and for all to the Modern day, Globalist Megalomaniacs controlling the WHO. Yes, the MONSTER Bill Gates in the second most significant contributor to the WHO. Also, Andrew, I must say I do believe that you are a patriotic Australian, but you must follow the Party line, and sadly, that has always been to implement all UN agendas onto the Australian People; we voters can’t stop where the POLITICIAN TRAITORS have been taking us all into the Globalists planned agenda of total control of the Sheeple, in Australia voting Green Party last, Labor party 2nd Last and LNP 3rd last, makes no difference to the duopoly, the TREASON continues yes LABOR is by far the most obedient to their UN Masters, Labor/Gang-Green VOICE referendum about destructive nonsense is just a distraction away from the final treason giving away our sovereignty to the Globalists puppets in the UN and WHO Under one flag, you say, Andrew, why are you showing the pretend Australian flag instead of your UN master's Flag? Soon the LABOR and LNP will act in concert as always to vote yes to giving the corrupt “WHO This year more than most, will be a sombre ANZAC Day celebration indeed of our fallen heroes, and likely it may be one of the last we will be allowed to celebrate. Kind regards,
Senator Antic attempted to get an answer as to the practical process of proving a person was an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. The Minister of that department could not define how this was done. In his reply, the Minister said that this process would become obvious once the Voice was initiated. It's all back to front.
The body for deciding seems to have a sliding scale of deciding if you are of indigenous identity or not depending on what your claiming for ? How does that even work, are you or aren't you why is there a difference, that seems to indicate the process is either lacking, corrupt or broken
The voice of delusional insanity permeates the current parliament. The Aboriginal Nation Delusion (The false and delusional belief that there was an aboriginal nation at the time of European colonisation of Australia) is divisive and destructive and needs to be called out and stopped.
NO to the Voice and NO to imported police who are not Citizens of Australia to be hired by State government, to police those who are Australian Citizens in Queensland! If the ALP get their way in Queensland it won't be long before other States follow suit!
Isn't Linda Burney on record as saying that, once the voice is enshrined in the Constitution "They won't be able to get rid of it, the way they did ATSIC?" Remember ATSIC?
PROTECT THE RIGHTS OF ALL AUSTRALIANS NO MATTER THEIR RACE, BELIEFS, ETC. THE PEOPLES POWER LIES IN OUR DEMOCRACY WHICH IS OUR CONSTITUTION AND IT IS TIME TO PROTECT OUR WAY OF LIFE. VOTE NO.
Check out the spectator Australia and quadrant magazine. Keith Windschuttle wrote a whole book called the Breakup of Australia on the aboriginal agenda which is quite good
For the sake of our constitution and for the sake of “every Australian citizen” vote “NO” to The Voice. The yes vote will disenfranchise all Australians, regardless of whether you are an indigenous Australian or not. We will loose the power of the ballot box and put the control of our government into the hands of a group of people who’s agendas will not be in the interests of “we the people”.
Vote NO, in NZ a wind farm development was stopped while MAORI figured out who owned the wind. Just ridiculous, tax payers money down the drain, and I have a maori background.
I thought all Australians, regardless of race, have the right to vote. What is being proposed for Australia with this seperate Aboriginal entity, would be akin to giving the white minority in SA, the authority to veto (control) the black government of South Africa..
there is absolutely no reason to go messing with our constitution, once they start then they will change what ever they want, without any say from the people of Australia.
So, how long before today have we had 'first nations' Australians in parliament or at any level of government before current year? At least decades I expect. So the 'voice' has been there, and been heard, for at least that long. Now I don't know what the government thinks it is, but it certainly isn't functioning as intended. Here's a dictionary definition of what a Governor is: 'a device automatically regulating the supply of fuel, steam, or water to a machine, ensuring uniform motion or limiting speed.' Now if you apply that definition to the thing that purports to govern our country, it's abundantly clear how dysfunctional that thing is. And now they want to add a second, even more dysfunctional government to the dysfunctional government we already have. I, and I expect any reasonable, Intellectually functional person would much prefer to fix what is already broken, not break it worse. I intend to vote No.
This is a sure path to civil unrest in Australia and other countries have their own version of this legislation couched in a different disguise that is leading to the same conclusion.
If this is the case, the Albanese government should be sacked for total incompetence, lack of honesty and in effect, treason against the Australian nation.
Australia is taken. The politicians and their lackeys are following orders from the WEF. Don't trust anyone. I keep hoping the Covid crap dished out by the corrupt politicians, following a planned agenda, taught people that.
This going back and forth to Court will just be a big waste of time and money. We are one nation. We do not need this division. And we need progress not hinders……
We are one Australian people, whether you are born here or migrated, this is divisive and abhorrent. Dividing a nation by ethnicity is unaustralian and stinks of apartheid. A wise man once said love your country and your people, but never trust your government. If people don't understand that they should take a look at the last couple of years of nonsense.
Yes, Australian Aboriginal people can have a voice but under the existing Australian Constitution and as Australian citizens. To change the Australian Constitution is one step closer to change the Australian Constitution for a Republic.
One step closer to a republic ? What logic are u using to jump from ur premise which appears to be correct to ur conclusion??? What on earth is ur reasoning to draw that conclusion ????
@peter garlick Because the government can't afford to have anyone outside of a Republic, by bringing every entity as one nationality provides the ability for government to invoke a Republic which foolishly the majority of Australians want, yet are to blind to see that Australia if it goes Republic will end up exactly like other Republic counties..... China, Russia, Mexico, Cuba. The problem with republics are.... a new constitution will need to be drawn up, with a new Republic constitution there is NO guarantee that rights or ANY rights of the people will be written into it. In short, you have the right to shut your mouth do as you're told or else, kind of not too far from where we are now., the right to a referendum as an example... gone, the mandatory obligation to vote in elections (currently a bluff scheme with the terms .. mandatory and obligation) basically NO rights as a human being, and only rights to do as the government dictates. That's why and how the government wants this Voice package to go, government has never in its inception conjured up a simple harmless plan for the masses to vote upon, unless there was something more sinister behind it that cements the outcome they are hunting for. The government has used this tactic before in a 1988 referendum that backfired on them, so they simply invoked what they wanted with a new legislated Act and got what they wanted.
@Karina Brampt, the current constitution is a frivolous, illegal and treasonous constitituion, there has never been a referendum to invoke it, it shouldn't be in effect, but corrupt politicians with nobody to answer too can do as they please, as evidenced in 1972 with a constitutional fraud that was committed.
Your lucky to get a referendum on it, we didn't here in New Zealand and they call it Co-Govence here, why are our Governments passing the same laws !! Who's pulling there chain
I can almost guarantee that the members appointed to the 'Voice' will be activists who bear a resentment towards Australia's British settlement. They will undoubtedly promote infinite regress and financial reparation. I believe there's only going to be five representatives on the 'Voice' (in addition to the rest) who actually live in remote or rural areas?
@@sithlord2001 Unfortunately, there'll probably be enough 'do gooders' who will vote in favour of this blatant move to appease those who want revenge and reparation rather than appeasement.
The problem is that the voice is not some faceless group, it will be the actual people involved with this voice, representing and pushing their own agendas, just like all politicians do under normal conditions
When I got saved. Washed in the blood of Jesus, forgiven and baptized in the holy spirit. I went to work the next day and excitingly told someone. Thinking they want it too. When he called out to others "Woodsy's got religion" I realised I'd crossed over to another place. I was still in the world but I wasn't of the world as the bible puts it. The work colleague couldn't understand. It was foolishness to him. As it would have been for me in earlier times. Andrew jokeingly talked about the guy having the Damascus road experience. True Christianity really is like that. You can't figure out God by your own interlet.(sp) Your own cunning. He's revealed himself to the foolish to confound the wise. All can come of course. That's what God wants. But you only get it. You only really understand it, when you get saved. Quite simple. From your heart ask forgiveness for sin. Do this in Jesus name. Jesus is God who walked among us and paid the price for sin. When you do this you WILL be saved. Now live your life for God. For Jesus. You'll now see things through a different lense. God's lense. Others won't understand. God has revealed himself to the foolish to confound the wise.(bible)
@@ronferguson4379 I believe it is! In all of my years of walking with the Lord, I’ve never had such a strong sensing that the rapture is in the air so to speak… Surely Babylon will fall very soon!!
A house Divided will not stand. I call on all Christians to pray. as for me first a child of God , Second, an indigenous person made in God image , It's a No for me. Amem
@@bobhebblewhite1685 Little known fact. In the early 1980's Colonel Gadaffi of Libya sent his brother on a tour of Australia. He visited several Aboriginal missions spreading marxist propaganda and attempting to ignite racial discord. On Palm Island he made a gift of 5.56mm AR 15 rifles to every eligible (over 17) male. Every single one went to pawn shops, private buyers ect for grog money in no time flat.
“Advice doesn’t have to be adopted.” Really. The first time the government chooses not to adopt something put up by the voice, the activists will cry racist, colonialist, fascist, hater………..etc.
They can also grind the machinery of Government to a halt by holding things up and holding the government to ransom. There will undoubtedly be trade offs that will be at the expense of 97% of Australians.
In my opinion, if successful, 'the voice' will do nothing but remove the ability of many if not most Aboriginal people from having any ability to be heard by the government of the day. It seems likely to me that 'the voice' will be made up of aboriginal people whose extreme ideology and opinions will very often not represent the true values and interests of everyday Aboriginal people, let alone any real consideration of the broader community in which we all live. I may be wrong but without a clear and fully stated explanation of exactly how it will be structured and how it will work it is impossible to know.
I would vote for it on one condition. That everyone who claims to be Aboriginal must pass a DNA test showing 50% or higher Aboriginal DNA. Also after the DNA test, everyone who fails and is less than 50% will be called non Aboriginal and lose all benefits.
Thanks for calling attention concerning proportion of Aboriginal DNA; as well as related DNA test, to exclude bogus (sic)Aboriginals. Concerning what is colloquially called the 'Voice', it can be argued that the jury is still out.
@@richardsaunders3743 well no the jury is still out the voice will morph into a far far bigger thing as has been said by the constructors of the voice. It WILL has a say in ALL matters brought to parliament and it will use the High Court to establish itself as a 3rd level of governance. Maybe not initially but in a few years if passed it will block the government. This is not to mention the sovereignty thing that will see ownership of all Australia pass to aboriginal tribes who WILL charge rent ie tax people who have bought land, leased or mining and will suck all non aboriginals dry. The only way to stop this madness is to vote NO and I will be voting NO along with family.
Just another way for people disgusting themselves as helping them to fill their pockets with taxpayers money. Pretty much anything to do with aboriginals is pissed up the wall
The Australian voice in parliament ..Albo called it a ‘GROUP’ of advisors. Group, not one ????? How many in this group ? What race will this VOICE or GROUP be made up of ????? Who are these voices going to be appointed BY ..bunch of lunatics. THIS IS APARTHEID ….
How are the "Voice Representation" Going to be elected? How long will they hold office? How will they be held to account? What if they are guilty of corruption?
Giving less than 4% of the population, who have an axe to grind, a real 'voice' over the rest, is lunacy. Especially when the membership of the Voice will be Aboriginal activists. Their community isn't exactly a success, even with the billions thrown at it, so how the hell can they be given a say in the rest of the country? One activist was suggesting that non-Aboriginal property owners should pay rent to them, 'voluntarily', of course. 'Voluntarily', for now, until they get to make it mandatory, that is. One of the first items on the agenda will be reparations, I can almost guarantee it. Vote NO to the Voice, or YOU will end up voiceless!
I found this perfect quote on a forum - "If the legislation is successful and works it doesn't need to be in the constitution and if it needs to be in the constitution to ensure the legislation works (by disallowing the easy disbanding option) then maybe it shouldn't be because it is a failure"
Albanese never sounds like he has any conviction regarding anything. It’s always, you know, she’ll be right, it’s the right thing to do, blah, blah, blah.
Ever wonder how things would've turned out if a sniper had taken out Hitler (who was also elected by a huge majority) in 1933? We've become too 'civilised'.
My Ozzie friends - you need to say NO! and stomp on The Voice. NZ is already a long way down this road and it is and will be a disaster
It is because nobody knows about this shit they sheeple
Yes, beware indeed. Should NZ Labour win this year's election, kiwis will be paying unelected tribal elites for our water supply. Just one example of an agenda that has been unchecked for too long. Nip it in the bud now Australia.
@Ronza S6 Stop prostituting yourself.
What is this referendum about? Im not from the country, can u point me where to check? Also whats the voice in this context? Thanks
You have no Ozzie friends.NZ has been a backdoor to Oz for years not to mention NZ has always been a bloodsucking thorn in our side.
If you believed “The Voice” was a good thing you need psychiatric help. Aboriginals have 11 voices currently, we don’t need people like Lidiot Thorpe and Linda Burnie having more power than they already have. I decided to vote NO the moment it was announced.
lydia wass a bikie mole while sitting on the crime commission....
The voice of delusional insanity permeates the current government.
Fuck the voice
@@johngeier8692 The government YOU helped elect: and haven't taken a potshot at (along with a few million others.
This is the battle for Australian democracy. Australians are being lulled by government and left-wing media organisations into voting YES. We must awaken Australians to vote NO.
Frankie,your right Frankie this is his way of getting a republic in the future. And unless people wake up to what he is doing then this country is DOOMED.
Its worrying how many Australians may vote 'yes' just to appear 'not racist'. How has this got so far already? Its beyond me.
I never stole anyone's Land... Leave me alone
They need to be awakened alright. Because as of right now, it seems the majority are set to virtue signal the country into a world of future pain.
@@echelon2k8 , spot on.
Please keep running this story... more average Australians need to know the real risks.
It feels like the entire world is heading toward something destructive and that it's been carefully planned all along. I've been trying to pinpoint it. I think it might have been during the time when both parents were starting to be out in the workforce, the cost of living became geared with two incomes so there was no going back, and children were being turned over to teachers and social workers to raise. Seems like someone decided to capitalize on this because it looks like so much of the ideology is being taught at all levels of education. I've also noticed a disconcerted effort to stop parents from even knowing what is going on in the schools. Idk...it's just an observation.
you are completely correct. Yes your intuitions are right. if you would like to share more lets talk
The 'referendum' exists merely to instil a sense of democracy, when in fact the outcome has already been pre-determined.
Research the Protocols of Zion. Then you will understand who are behind the destruction of real culture and so much more.
Since WW2 actually. . .
I believe that is very very real, you hit the nail on the head. Take the time to see what your offspring are being 'taught' in schools and universities: there's a LOT of ideology being inserted wherever an opening presents itself. Professors who call Australia Day 'Invasion Day'; references to 'genocide' (incorrect), Terra Nullius (incorrect), 'stolen' land (never owned in the first place) - the list goes on. I shudder to think what else the educators are opining about; transgenderism, racism, all the other '-sms' we are saddled with in this modern mixed-up world .
SAY NO TO APARTHEID ALBO! 👎
The voice of delusional insanity permeates the current government.
The energy problems in Europe were ignored and the profound insanity of Net Zero was doubled down on.
The current government is devoid of common sense and appears to be incapable of recognising dangerous and destructive popular delusions.
SOC!
Reverse apartheid 😅😂😂😂
We don't vote the voice to represent the people of australia. We vote for the government to represent us. Why would anyone in any country want an unelected group able to make decisions over the elected government. Madness.
Just look at the UN, WEF and the WHO, they are telling our government what to do.
Yes unelected officials telling our Government what to do.
The so called white working population of Australia are already being discriminated at by working and trying to better themselves, as this other mob and illegal immigrants get every thing given to them housing , medical, childcare, own medical centres, own childcare centres, own legal aid, the list goes on. As they don't have to PROVE their links to the Aboriginal DNA.
But! One nation one flag and vote NO.
@@FuzzyBearYT What are you talking about?
We have that under constitutional monarchy
@@douglasnakamura6753European union. EU officials are selected not elected
Seems to be the WEF job
Voting to remove the authority of elected officials and hand over control to self selected activists. What could go wrong.
Imagine someone like Lydia Thorpe at the wheel.
IDK. But isn't that kinda like the EU?
@@peterwatson4382 Chlamydia Thorpe is trouble
That's exactly what I call her.
@@sidecarmisanthrope5927 very similar, from the same agenda. That is why the EU is not happy with Italy, they are rocking the boat violently.
I have indigenous ancestry & this has sounded weird to me from the outset . I'm Australian , I vote , celebrate Australia Day & pay taxes . I'm sick of the sooks that live in the past , get over it & get a job .
The real reason why the Labor Party are pursuing a Voice referendum.
The Australian Labor Party in promoting its “YES” vote for a voice to parliament to have the Constitution changed by referendum. The Labor Party is not being open and truthful as to the real reason it is conducting this referendum.
In 1990, Federal Politician Kim Beasley made a statement in response to Senator Button's question in the Australian Federal Parliament about whether there should be a republic. His reply was:
Kim Beasley Quote: "The United Nations has given the Federal Government a mandate of ownership for housing, farms, property and business to government control once the REPUBLIC has been proclaimed."
The comment by Kim Beasley in parliament back in 1990 should be ringing alarm bells. The United Nations is the NWO in waiting for a one world government.
The current push by the Labor Party for the ‘Voice’ referendum is the single most important part of their plan, which is to include the 'ORIGINAL' Men, Women and children of this Country (Indigenous people) into the Commonwealth Constitution because, at the moment they have 'NO CONTRACT' with the 'ORIGINAL' Men, Women and children of this Country.
Because there is ‘No Contract’ with the Indigenous people of Australia, a republic would not be achieved because the ‘ORIGINAL’ Men, Women and children of this country are the lawful land owners and the government would be unable to take control over ownership of housing, farms, property and business, thus thwarting its secretive push for a totalitarian republic where you would own nothing and be happy.
This plan as you can see was already underway back in 1990. Every State in Australia has already sold off the Lands and Title Office, your original titles have been destroyed. The value of your property is in the TITLE.
All properties certificate of title has been digitised and this is not a lawful proof of historical ownership.
Say ‘NO’ to the Voice and say ‘NO’
I don't have confidence in the Australian people to vote wisely for anything.
My word! The many voted in Labor 😂🤮🤮🤮
Same here , David. Covid and climate hysteria have shown how gullible (or worse , activist) the population have become .
Given the Aust. Education/ indoctrination system in race , gender and climate leftist propaganda , l'm not confident.
Same. Especially seeing the way they just accepted Covid policies.
@Just the truth People Not really only 33% voted for Labor federally even in victoria it only got 36% they actually lost 5%
I'll be voting no, for writing apartheid into our Australian constitution
It was founded on Apartheid . . in fact the White Australia policy was one of the systems that the South African model was based on . . . Electing an organised advisory body to bridge the gap . . . is a hell of lot better than the continual compensation model the Australia tax payer has been having for the last 100 or so years . . If we arent going to move this forward whats the alternative??
Let the Palaeolithic hunter gatherers breed out.
@@johngeier8692 Or you could just get out of the way forward for the country and STFU
@@adriangallyot4193 Just say no. The Germans wanted change in the thirties, look how that worked out.
@@smedleyfarnsworth263 Please tell me you are not seriously suggesting that we have the same political conditions in Australiain in 2023 . . than Nazi germany in the 1930s? . . . Just say no is not how anyone moves forward . . . the voice is an advisory body . . it is NOT apartheid . . it does not restrict any races right to live in this country at all. What in the world are you talking about?
No apartheid for Australia! Vote NO!
Australia already had apartheid in its purest form. Arnhem Land is no different to the states created in South Africa during apartheid.
Or New Zealand.
@@Homophobicpride correct the black are gifted everything whilst everyone else has to work for it....
I will be but I fear the Oz we grew up in is gone and insanity will prevail.
Vote YES✅
This segment needs to go out far and wide for all the nimbits to see because they need it spelled out to them to open their eyes.
Subject: Voice to Parliament
Follow this and you will clearly understand the "Voice"
What if a waiter at a Chinese restaurant explained the menu to Linda Burney (Indigenous Australians Minister) in the manner she responds to questions about the voice model?
Waiter: Good evening and welcome. I’ll be taking your order.
Burney: Thank you. Could I please have the prawn dumplings to begin with, followed by the Mongolian lamb and…
Waiter: Sorry to interrupt, but we have revised our ordering process. This is our new menu. (Hands leather-bound folder to Burney)
Burney: (Opens folder, revealing only a single page) There must be a mistake. Where are the dishes?
Waiter: Look under the heading.
Burney: The heading says ‘food’. There’s nothing listed underneath.
Waiter: It’s what we call a principle-based menu. I’ll put you down for food for one, shall I?
Burney: I’m sorry, but is this a joke?
Waiter: I can assure you this new menu will be to your liking. The food will be delicious. It will nourish. It will enrich. It will bring diners together.
Burney: Look, this doesn’t have to be a complex question. What dishes are you offering?
Waiter: You don’t like the new menu?
Burney: How can I like it when I know nothing about it?
Waiter: Of course you will like it. The food is delicious. It nourishes. It enriches. It will bring diners together.
Burney: So you keep saying. But how do I know what I’d be getting?
Waiter: There is a wealth of information available on Chinese cuisine, which you can read for yourself. I suggest you start with ‘Classic Chinese Dishes’ by T. Calma & M. Langton.
Burney: This restaurant endorses that book?
Waiter: No.
Burney: But nonetheless this restaurant serves the dishes contained in that book?
Waiter: I didn’t say that.
Burney: Then what is the point of reading it?
Waiter: It will help you understand that the food we serve is delicious. It will nourish. It will enrich. It will bring -
Burney: Will you stop saying that! If you can’t answer simple questions, then forget it. You’re not getting my business.
Waiter: I urge you not to be divisive. After all, the Asian owners of this restaurant have generously extended their hand and asked you to walk with them on this journey. You don’t want to be associated with the xenophobes, do you?
Burney: That’s preposterous! And by the way, you don’t even list prices on the menu. What’s this going to cost me?
Waiter: It’s not our policy to reveal our prices upfront. But don’t worry, you’ll find out - eventually!
Please share this with another ten people….
Well put Robert, that is a keeper.
Bravo
LUVVITT
I love it...and just when the government has decided we're all mugs. As for Burney, I like it best when she moves her mouth but the ventriloquist doesn't let any words come out
VOTE NO to Albo's Trojan horse. This referendum is undemocratic, all Australian's should be equal.
WE ARE ONE WE ARE UNITED WE ARE HUMANITY !!! the govt wants chaos
Ever wonder how much better the world would be if some sniper had taken out Hitler in 1932? hint hint hint....
So from advisory body to law makers.
Australia you been warned AGAIN .
The voice of delusional insanity permeates the current parliament.
I bet you won't answer this: Why do you support the CCP ???
70% Say NO.
ANY law or arrangement that provides additional rights for one group over another, BASED ON RACE, is by definition RACIST. Australias aboriginal people already have the same "voice" as all other Australians, it's called a VOTE. As Nelson Mandela once said,: "I detest racialism because it is barbaric, whether it comes from a black man or a white man." Well said Mr. President.
Does that mean the voice can hold us to ransom till they get there own way,,😡
That's the idea!
NO TO THE VOICE.
What an absolute disgrace our government is. Say NO to this, ‘voice madness’!! What an absolute joke we have become here in Australia. We supposed to, ‘sing with ‘one voice’ I am, you are, we are Australians’. Wake up Australia.😠🤷🙏🙏
Dear oh dear, "the government" isn't our government, it's a foreign corporate body masquerading as government. Registered as a company in the Us-Sec (United States Security Commission) so it's not even Australian, it only has Australians as employees of the company in charge of Australian affairs, but dictated too by US board of directors.
Our government is bad enough as it is, why make it 10x worse?! That song will be meaningless if this goes through. A token gesture from leftists
govt are psychos
@@SharonNewman-dd6gq Hi Sharen. Here we have another example of Aliens in our country😠?!. IF they were Australian's?. They would not need to translate to english?!. They would know what Psychos, means & how many retards are in our goverment😠.
We KNOW that. Tell your local politician, long and loud. And also tell him/her to start looking for a new job.
Prof. martia langdon was a lecturer at my university. She was extremely angry , and divisive in her lectures and basically blamed everything on colonisation ,( white men) but refused to acknowledge any advancement in Australian society from pre colonisation.To get good marks you had to parrot the far left ideological doctrine that was presented.Any argument or diversion away was marked down. She is smart but an angry zealot, and is positioning herself as a powerful figure in this unelected body.
I've been watching her over the years, and I agree.. yes.....she's angry, bitter and twisted, and should NEVER hold ANY reigns of power over the people. I'd hate to come across her in a dark alley.
@@r1nkyd1nk66… and dangerous.
Interesting but not surprising that her students had to agree with her opinions in order to pass. "Come to university and learn how to think for yourself".
Won't admit that her people's culture is at least thirty thousand years out of date, nor that her people's numbers were already in decline for at least 500 years before european colonisation.
I've always wondered how a person like her can even have a job in a university
let the people of australia vote...where's OUR voice? Good on you Bolt! Australia needs more like you.
It is scary to think that at present a majority of Australians are in favour of the voice. All the pitfalls of the voice need to be exposed in the lead up to the referendum. Making Aboriginals superior to the other 97% of the population is the most ridiculous proposal I've ever heard and a form of discrimination. We haven't even defined what an Aboriginal is. If you are even only 7% Aboriginal and Scandinavian looking, you still count as Aboriginal even though 93% of you isn't. Impose a 50% minimum blood quantum requirement and see the numbers dwindle to next to nothing. There are a lot of opportunists who identify as Aboriginal these days.
Who said they are in favour? Who? I'll bet you 75% vote NO. Come on, lay your money on the online table!
Bloody right mate got it in one 👍.
@@garynewton1263 Your inner circle is obviously not a reliable source of how Australia thinks and you are totally underestimating how woke this country has become. If polls are to be believed, only WA and Qld will vote it down with a 56% overall YES vote. The only hope is for NSW to also vote it down as well, but that isn't looking likely. The other states are guaranteed to vote YES. People have their eyes shut to the possible ramifications of the Voice to Parliament. Government will be extorted into making huge concessions at the expense of 97% of the population, but most people are totally ignorant about that.
@@garynewton1263 yeah but the voting will be rigged for sure just like Andrews getting back in. Rigged for sure.
I'll be proud to #VoteNo
Am more than happy to tell people I will be voting NO along with family.
#VoteNo
We are misled about everything. Labor is treating us like mugs. Albo promised not to do deals with the greens and so far, he's done 2 deals with them. He never mentioned this enshrined voice or his IR reforms. Labor have proven who they are and who they serve.
The population was mugs during lockdowns...the government knows Australians are pushovers
I think Bolt is treating you like a mug, but its ok to run with the losers.
@@ianenglish123 If we allow all the virtue signalers out there to win this thing now, we're all be losers in the long run. If this ever gets written permanently into the nation's constitution, Australia's democracy will be a joke forever more.
@@ianenglish123 thats interesting. Can you help me understand why the Voice will help unify all Australians? Or if that is not its purpose, what will it do to assist Australia?
@@echelon2k8 funny but Australia is one of the few developed countries that doesn't recognise its indigenous culture or cultural divisions, except perhaps China. For two many years we've trashed the aboriginal culture, Rio Tinto is a classic example.
If we voted Pauline Hanson this definitely would not have gotten this far. This is our culture don't change it,. If they don't like it lump it.
One Nation does not collude with the Climate Delusion, the Energy Transition Delusion, the Nuclear Power is Unsafe Delusion nor the Aboriginal Nation Delusion.
Muttonhead Dutton needs to grow a spine and call out these ridiculous and destructive popular delusions.
Indeed... I love Pauline and am shocked how few Australians vote for her or even take her seriously.
A pity she is what she is!!!
Yes she has been right about most things since she started.
A massive IF. But what was the culture for 50 000 years?
I rarely agree with Bolt but I do think the Voice in the constitution is just madness. We’ve been told that it will only effect policies that effect indigenous people but as indigenous people are Australian People that live in the community there are no issues that do not effect them. Indigenous people don’t live in a separate country. Further the government is trying to quieten debate on this issue by not funding marketing. This is just crazy. Just because someone doesn’t agree with the voice doesn’t mean they are racists, in fact quite the opposite in my view. Having policies that treat different races differently is discrimination. So why we actively pursuit discriminatory policy in an attempt to find equality has always puzzled me. Then permanently embedding discriminatory policy permanently into the Australian constitution is madness in my opinion.
Of course it is madness. A vanity project for Albo, with a ready entourage of Blaktivists to bolster up his, and their own, egos.
The term 'racist' should be expunged from the Australian vocabulary, by law. It seems to be just a go-to, free-pass kind of meaningless terminology that is immediately resorted to, to shut down anyone in opposition. Perhaps we could have a referendum on that . . .
Agree 👍 I'm not a fan of Bolt but with this he is absolutely right ... keep his explanation moving ... share and share ...
They aren't interested in giving useful advice, they are concerned with "making decisions". They want to be in charge of decision making. They want to tell everybody how to behave and live. They want obediance.
fkem !
The ularoo meeting turned out a no go as they could not agree yet they say they did also left a lot of mobs out of discussion we do not want a minor group telling us what to do say or almost think in WA madness has taken over already with the land Aboriginal council no able to tell farmers and almost every one they must ask permission to attend anything on there property will anything get done crops food roads trees planted etc and watch them try to get rent from home owners who is going to get all the money involved in this crazy business business?? Money from WA will be very low for the gov state and feds their plan our disaster.
My mother fought for land rights and even she will vote 'NO' against The Voice.
Your mother should never have supported land rights either. It was just another divisive action that should not have happened. It is one of the reasons we will not be one people for the foreseeable future. People in the aboriginal community are still claiming land and charging other Australians to use it once they are handed it. Your mother helped create a corrupt welfare based system that is constantly abused for advantage by people with nefarious and self serving agendas. A system that does very little other then demand. All her good intentions up in smoke. Is she actually aware of how much land has freely been given to the aboriginals since land rights were achieved? She might be shock to know how much a poofteenth of the Australian population has been given by virtue signalling politicians to the aboriginals to this day. Not to mention the copious amounts of Australian taxpayers money given. All to be mismanaged and siphoned off by bad actors. She might also be interested in who is gaining benefit and who is just neglect within these very community by their own people. The whole thing is disgusting and purely corrupt.
The Australian government has never cared about any people in Australia and all they seek is the division of people. I am sick of our media and government costantly taunting the people of Australia and dastroying the original inhabitants culture. I think it all comes down to freedom and respect which doesn't exist in Australia. Instead they choose to intimidate and divide consantly and then tell us they are helping. I will vote no as well. Thanks for your comment.
@@georgemav7 The problem is not only with the government. Many aboriginals and the cling-ons that leech from them are hurting themselves and other Australians with their divisive actions. They continually help sew the seeds of division for their own benefit under the fake banner of reconciliation and aboriginal rights. If you really looked into it you would know they constantly mistreat their own people. Like the government many only care about what they can gain for themselves from it.
You can only stop what is occurring in Australia and unite the Australia people if self serving bad actors, both aboriginal and not, stop virtue signalling, playing the victim and sponging off other Australians for their own enrichment. People need to stop putting out their hands for a free ride through life.
We need to reset the clock. No one alive today can claim they are owed anything for what happen to others of their ancestry. It never happened to them so they don't need reconciliation for it and I like all Australians alive today never wronged them or their ancestors. That applies to all races and any past so called crime people claim a need to be placated and compensated for. It is pure greed and entitlement. I wish I was treated as poorly as many of these victims think they are. I would be a lot better off.
The government is not destroying the culture of aboriginals. If anything they spending copious amounts of taxpayer money to preserve it. Also they are not the original inhabitants. The original inhabitants are long dead. Some at the hands of the current aboriginals' ancestors. If you want to look at it through the lens of woke activism they probably owe their descendants something if any are left to be found.
The truth is I, like many Australians alive today, am indigenous and aboriginal because of being born here. And that is the only way besides legal immigration that it should be looked at. It should not be decided by ethnicity, colour, perceived social standing nor victim status which are the only categories that seem to matter these days.
By the looks of your youtube Site, you look pretty White to me YEAH
why do you want land rights,,you cant prove you own it. besides,,if the british didnt colonise aus.. there would be no blacks..think yourself lucky, you get an education, house, job,shirt, dole, ect..you get more than we do..& the refugee,s from indonesia, africa, get more than both of us.. ive said for yrs,, live as we do,,or go find a tree.. no ifs buts gray area.. you hate the british,,??,,hell,, weve been invaded hundreds of times.. your not alone.. as to refugee,s,,id give them a gun & send them back.. the aus navy used to sink them,,before the goodi goodi,s came about.. they wont fight for aus..
I am afraid Australians are too disinterested to say no. We are on the edge of destruction
The whole western world is, mostly due to a population of primarily dumbed down people who have become way too comfortable.
Unfortunately i think this is the truth.
Pitchforks...
@@peterRobinson10101 no, guns.
Blob
A lot of Australians if they have grog, gambling and sport they don't care for much else.
This is pretty frightening. Seems to aim for two classes of Australian enshrined via being pushed into a referendum on the issue. Some Australians, are to be elevated in power and importance, because of a perceived historical debt, that now must be paid back by all modern Australians. Who ever heard of the fact that historical guilt is just that, history, and the marxist view of children paying for the "crimes" of their parents and grandparents or vice versa is something taken straight from the North Korea playbook. My family only arrived in 1975, as migrants escaping the Irish troubles in Belfast. Why in heavens name are we being made racially inferior somehow with enforced and inherited guilt for something that was terrible at the time, but like what was done to the Irish, is just something we need to move on from...I do not accept Aboriginals or any other minority from having rights, primacy or controls over me or any other citizen. I do agree we need to do better than what has been the case, but that is a matter for policy and not legislation.
My question too is about priority - as this is all before we have tackled the core issue post-Covid that affects all of us- which is a bill of rights to stop the abuses of power applied at State and national level to "save us" from Covid or any other 'national emergency' that governments decide to declare without independent court sanctioned overview to balance the powers out.
Quite right. Interesting as you say that legislation enabling governments to use our police to use force to achieve compliance remains intact. Where's our voice?
@thomas concaig: Eysenck and Jensen studied race and IQ in the early twentieth century.
Australoids have a low average IQ and high criminality.
100% spot on
The Climate Emergency is the next CON on the list.
Well said, Thomas.
The less detail the Government provides, the more we should be skeptical of what it means for the country. I wouldn't sign ANY contract without knowing WHAT it is about. A BIG NO from me.
in Canada, the constitution has been re-written in 1982 by Trudeau's father (then Prime minister), when they did re-write it they negotiated with the provinces to make amendments, it lasted a few weeks and everyone agreed so it looked, so the next day when it was time for signing it all in, Some provinces had decided to CHANGE the text of the constitution without telling One province, Quebec, so at his arrival in Ottawa the morning of the signature, the prime Minister of Quebec was told that the text had been changed without telling him, he then decided not to sign it, we call the Night previous to the signature: "the night of the long knives". Trudeau then said, no problem we will negotiate something after and we will make sure to include Quebec into the constitution, BUT now to make ANY changes to the constitution, they need to have 100% of the votes in favour of the change instead of the 75% before, they tried twice to include Quebec in the constitution and they failed twice as ONE PERSON was not Ok with it, ONE PERSON disagreed, so as a Quebecer I am not Canadian on paper because the rest of Canada changed their mind without asking us first and they made sure it would be impossible in the future as well. Don't let that happen to you Australia.
Well, I did not need warning, I knew from day one that this is the aim. No activist would want a Voice that does't need to be listened to. Been telling everyone who listens that changing the constitution to allow legal racism is madness of the highest order
The VOICE is just a distraction away from their main TREASON; what will the LNP do when the Government pushes to vote yes to be totally controlled by the "World Health Organisation” total authority during their next PLANNED-DEMIC, whatever they choose it to be? I’m saddened to watch the destruction of our hard-won freedoms by the millions who died so our democracy could survive. BUT soon, because of the 45 years of cowardly politician TRAITORS agreeing to the UN Lima agreement and all UN agenda agreements since then. The LABOR and LNP will sign over Australia’s sovereignty once and for all to the Modern day, Globalist Megalomaniacs controlling the WHO. Yes, the MONSTER Bill Gates in the second most significant contributor to the WHO. Also, Andrew, I must say I do believe that you are a patriotic Australian, but you must follow the Party line, and sadly, that has always been to implement all UN agendas onto the Australian People; we voters can’t stop where the POLITICIAN TRAITORS have been taking us all into the Globalists planned agenda of total control of the Sheeple, in Australia voting Green Party last, Labor party 2nd Last and LNP 3rd last, makes no difference to the duopoly, the TREASON continues yes LABOR is by far the most obedient to their UN Masters, Labor/Gang-Green VOICE referendum about destructive nonsense is just a distraction away from the final treason giving away our sovereignty to the Globalists puppets in the UN and WHO
Under one flag, you say, Andrew, why are you showing the pretend Australian flag instead of your UN master's Flag? Soon the LABOR and LNP will act in concert as always to vote yes to giving the corrupt “WHO
This year more than most, will be a sombre ANZAC Day celebration indeed of our fallen heroes, and likely it may be one of the last we will be allowed to celebrate.
Kind regards,
The sin of the world is to
Now we know the truth power over everything and everyone. Vote NO
Abloody nightmare just like in NZ!
Advisory only??.. 🗣.. THEN .. THERE’S NO REASON FOR IT TO BE PART OF OUR CONSTITUTION‼️
I've already decided to vote NO!
The one thing I'm hearing very clearly above all the noise is, "Trust me, I'm a politician." Hands up anyone who would be stupid enough to do that.
Could the Voice eventually mean that every Land/Home owner will have to pay a RENTAL to Aboriginals?
High possibility
Yes, that just came to me aswell.
That's exactly what will happen and e erything that u do or where u go in australia you will be taxed for already starting
at the very least! They would by law be able to take your land as their own! WEF and the UN is pushing this agenda 2030
do some research!
We already do - via the many organisations that 'look after' aboriginals. Eg NIAA $4 billion a year, fre medicines, free dental... etc
Senator Antic attempted to get an answer as to the practical process of proving a person was an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. The Minister of that department could not define how this was done. In his reply, the Minister said that this process would become obvious once the Voice was initiated. It's all back to front.
Yes I watched that. Senator Antic was also told what he was asking was verging on racism when they bumbled around without providing an answer.
The body for deciding seems to have a sliding scale of deciding if you are of indigenous identity or not depending on what your claiming for ? How does that even work, are you or aren't you why is there a difference, that seems to indicate the process is either lacking, corrupt or broken
The voice of delusional insanity permeates the current parliament.
The Aboriginal Nation Delusion (The false and delusional belief that there was an aboriginal nation at the time of European colonisation of Australia) is divisive and destructive and needs to be called out and stopped.
Yes. It is like signing a contract but not being allowed to see the terms of that contract until after you sign.
Antic is nothing more than a clown who wants attention.
I don't care it says
I am going to vote NO
We need to focus on security and not focus on WOKE Interference on LIBERTY
NO to the Voice and NO to imported police who are not Citizens of Australia to be hired by State government, to police those who are Australian Citizens in Queensland! If the ALP get their way in Queensland it won't be long before other States follow suit!
Wow another layer, that'll be just as bad as the bloody greens,the Country will be ungovernable. How will Australia progress in any direction.
It won't that's the point.
Spot on
Isn't Linda Burney on record as saying that, once the voice is enshrined in the Constitution "They won't be able to get rid of it, the way they did ATSIC?" Remember ATSIC?
nightmare
If a nation is divided, it is a sitting duck, which he wants us to become so that he can hand us all over to his WEF.
I don't trust anyone who can't be trusted to be around petrol without misusing it.
PROTECT THE RIGHTS OF ALL AUSTRALIANS NO MATTER THEIR RACE, BELIEFS, ETC. THE PEOPLES POWER LIES IN OUR DEMOCRACY WHICH IS OUR CONSTITUTION AND IT IS TIME TO PROTECT OUR WAY OF LIFE.
VOTE NO.
One People..one Country n one Government..wake up Australians n put a stop to this bs..
So glad we have you Andrew. You are a lone voice of reason in an insane asylum. Thank you 🙏
Check out the spectator Australia and quadrant magazine. Keith Windschuttle wrote a whole book called the Breakup of Australia on the aboriginal agenda which is quite good
No reply?
WE are Australian, not US and THEM. Vote NO.
😈 FIRST PUT FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION SO CITIZENS HAVE A LEGAL VOICE 😈
It’s still a NO from me
How’s that national unity going Albo ?
How to start a civil war. Vote yes for the voice.
For the sake of our constitution and for the sake of “every Australian citizen” vote “NO” to The Voice. The yes vote will disenfranchise all Australians, regardless of whether you are an indigenous Australian or not. We will loose the power of the ballot box and put the control of our government into the hands of a group of people who’s agendas will not be in the interests of “we the people”.
The voice should be ALL of us ! Not devided races representatives or politicians Australian people as a whole !
Vote NO, in NZ a wind farm development was stopped while MAORI figured out who owned the wind. Just ridiculous, tax payers money down the drain, and I have a maori background.
I thought all Australians, regardless of race, have the right to vote. What is being proposed for Australia with this seperate Aboriginal entity, would be akin to giving the white minority in SA, the authority to veto (control) the black government of South Africa..
there is absolutely no reason to go messing with our constitution, once they start then they will change what ever they want, without any say from the people of Australia.
So, how long before today have we had 'first nations' Australians in parliament or at any level of government before current year? At least decades I expect. So the 'voice' has been there, and been heard, for at least that long.
Now I don't know what the government thinks it is, but it certainly isn't functioning as intended.
Here's a dictionary definition of what a Governor is: 'a device automatically regulating the supply of fuel, steam, or water to a machine, ensuring uniform motion or limiting speed.'
Now if you apply that definition to the thing that purports to govern our country, it's abundantly clear how dysfunctional that thing is.
And now they want to add a second, even more dysfunctional government to the dysfunctional government we already have.
I, and I expect any reasonable, Intellectually functional person would much prefer to fix what is already broken, not break it worse.
I intend to vote No.
This is a sure path to civil unrest in Australia and other countries have their own version of this legislation couched in a different disguise that is leading to the same conclusion.
But this is what "equality" apparently looks like now, with some people being more equal than others.
If this is the case, the Albanese government should be sacked for total incompetence, lack of honesty and in effect, treason against the Australian nation.
Spot on, but wishful thinking!
Australia is taken. The politicians and their lackeys are following orders from the WEF. Don't trust anyone. I keep hoping the Covid crap dished out by the corrupt politicians, following a planned agenda, taught people that.
This going back and forth to Court will just be a big waste of time and money. We are one nation. We do not need this division. And we need progress not hinders……
We are one Australian people, whether you are born here or migrated, this is divisive and abhorrent. Dividing a nation by ethnicity is unaustralian and stinks of apartheid.
A wise man once said love your country and your people, but never trust your government. If people don't understand that they should take a look at the last couple of years of nonsense.
Yes, Australian Aboriginal people can have a voice but under the existing Australian Constitution and as Australian citizens. To change the Australian Constitution is one step closer to change the Australian Constitution for a Republic.
One step closer to a republic ? What logic are u using to jump from ur premise which appears to be correct to ur conclusion??? What on earth is ur reasoning to draw that conclusion ????
They already have Representatives in parliament
@peter garlick Because the government can't afford to have anyone outside of a Republic, by bringing every entity as one nationality provides the ability for government to invoke a Republic which foolishly the majority of Australians want, yet are to blind to see that Australia if it goes Republic will end up exactly like other Republic counties..... China, Russia, Mexico, Cuba. The problem with republics are.... a new constitution will need to be drawn up, with a new Republic constitution there is NO guarantee that rights or ANY rights of the people will be written into it.
In short, you have the right to shut your mouth do as you're told or else, kind of not too far from where we are now., the right to a referendum as an example... gone, the mandatory obligation to vote in elections (currently a bluff scheme with the terms .. mandatory and obligation) basically NO rights as a human being, and only rights to do as the government dictates.
That's why and how the government wants this Voice package to go, government has never in its inception conjured up a simple harmless plan for the masses to vote upon, unless there was something more sinister behind it that cements the outcome they are hunting for.
The government has used this tactic before in a 1988 referendum that backfired on them, so they simply invoked what they wanted with a new legislated Act and got what they wanted.
@Karina Brampt, the current constitution is a frivolous, illegal and treasonous constitituion, there has never been a referendum to invoke it, it shouldn't be in effect, but corrupt politicians with nobody to answer too can do as they please, as evidenced in 1972 with a constitutional fraud that was committed.
Your right they already have a voice they have 11 democratically voted in members of parliament.
Vote no to changing our constitution. Vote no to racism.
lol lol
Who selects these people to the voice? Are they selected for a specific term or the will of the puppetmaster?
They’re selected by the government. He won’t even speak to anyone from the aboriginal communities to discuss the voice and how it will benefit them.
they will be in forever and you wont be. Vote NO.
Your lucky to get a referendum on it, we didn't here in New Zealand and they call it Co-Govence here, why are our Governments passing the same laws !! Who's pulling there chain
Australians want the details or we vote NO
We sing with ONE VOICE, I am You are We are Australian.
Like hell we are!! What kind of "Dweezil" would make such a statement?!
@@donandrew3230 typical lefty racist name caller
No!
I can almost guarantee that the members appointed to the 'Voice' will be activists who bear a resentment towards Australia's British settlement. They will undoubtedly promote infinite regress and financial reparation. I believe there's only going to be five representatives on the 'Voice' (in addition to the rest) who actually live in remote or rural areas?
Imagine how much they would resent Japanese, Chinese our Indonesian settlement?
Your missing the point. Let's not go down that path in the 1st place.
@@sithlord2001 Unfortunately, there'll probably be enough 'do gooders' who will vote in favour of this blatant move to appease those who want revenge and reparation rather than appeasement.
Why isn't this Treason? 😕 I mean is that what his intension is? To say sorry that way?
The problem is that the voice is not some faceless group, it will be the actual people involved with this voice, representing and pushing their own agendas, just like all politicians do under normal conditions
Exactly,just like white people ,they have their own government and says what goes,how's that for division.
The Holy Spirit is the only voice we Need to Hear.
When I got saved. Washed in the blood of Jesus, forgiven and baptized in the holy spirit. I went to work the next day and excitingly told someone. Thinking they want it too. When he called out to others "Woodsy's got religion" I realised I'd crossed over to another place. I was still in the world but I wasn't of the world as the bible puts it. The work colleague couldn't understand. It was foolishness to him. As it would have been for me in earlier times. Andrew jokeingly talked about the guy having the Damascus road experience. True Christianity really is like that. You can't figure out God by your own interlet.(sp) Your own cunning. He's revealed himself to the foolish to confound the wise. All can come of course. That's what God wants. But you only get it. You only really understand it, when you get saved. Quite simple. From your heart ask forgiveness for sin. Do this in Jesus name. Jesus is God who walked among us and paid the price for sin. When you do this you WILL be saved. Now live your life for God. For Jesus. You'll now see things through a different lense. God's lense. Others won't understand. God has revealed himself to the foolish to confound the wise.(bible)
In the last days wicked men will proceed from bad to worse. 2Timothy 3:13 What is bad now in 2 years will be even worse. The Rapture is very close.
@@trevorwoods3367
AMEN brother!!
@@ronferguson4379
I believe it is! In all of my years of walking with the Lord, I’ve never had such a strong sensing that the rapture is in the air so to speak… Surely Babylon will fall very soon!!
A house Divided will not stand. I call on all Christians to pray. as for me first a child of God , Second, an indigenous person made in God image ,
It's a No for me. Amem
I'm voting No.
If they want to change the constitution, then give us a 2nd Amendment such as the USA. That will sort out a lot of issues, especially in Alice Springs
Yes , bring it on !
Too right!
Cannot have referendums on anything that would genuinely help the people! Wtf do you think this is? A democracy?
where do i collect my gun, i am fully trained on the l1a1 slr 7.62 mm.
@@bobhebblewhite1685 Little known fact. In the early 1980's Colonel Gadaffi of Libya sent his brother on a tour of Australia. He visited several Aboriginal missions spreading marxist propaganda and attempting to ignite racial discord. On Palm Island he made a gift of 5.56mm AR 15 rifles to every eligible (over 17) male. Every single one went to pawn shops, private buyers ect for grog money in no time flat.
“Advice doesn’t have to be adopted.” Really. The first time the government chooses not to adopt something put up by the voice, the activists will cry racist, colonialist, fascist, hater………..etc.
They can also grind the machinery of Government to a halt by holding things up and holding the government to ransom. There will undoubtedly be trade offs that will be at the expense of 97% of Australians.
I have not believed in this Voice thing right from day 1
In my opinion, if successful, 'the voice' will do nothing but remove the ability of many if not most Aboriginal people from having any ability to be heard by the government of the day. It seems likely to me that 'the voice' will be made up of aboriginal people whose extreme ideology and opinions will very often not represent the true values and interests of everyday Aboriginal people, let alone any real consideration of the broader community in which we all live. I may be wrong but without a clear and fully stated explanation of exactly how it will be structured and how it will work it is impossible to know.
The plan is for the Voice to be an officially sanctioned voice for Marxist-Socialists activists to further DIVIDE Australia.
Part truth and possibility
yeah and then they will want a treaty then republic. We are doomed.
I would vote for it on one condition. That everyone who claims to be Aboriginal must pass a DNA test showing 50% or higher Aboriginal DNA. Also after the DNA test, everyone who fails and is less than 50% will be called non Aboriginal and lose all benefits.
Still not good enough for me it is NO or nothing
Thanks for calling attention concerning proportion of Aboriginal DNA; as well as related DNA test, to exclude bogus (sic)Aboriginals.
Concerning what is colloquially called the 'Voice', it can be argued that the jury is still out.
@@richardsaunders3743 well no the jury is still out the voice will morph into a far far bigger thing as has been said by the constructors of the voice. It WILL has a say in ALL matters brought to parliament and it will use the High Court to establish itself as a 3rd level of governance. Maybe not initially but in a few years if passed it will block the government. This is not to mention the sovereignty thing that will see ownership of all Australia pass to aboriginal tribes who WILL charge rent ie tax people who have bought land, leased or mining and will suck all non aboriginals dry. The only way to stop this madness is to vote NO and I will be voting NO along with family.
There is no specific gene to specifically identify Australian aboriginals.
They test the same as those from the Indian sub continent.
@@larrykin3178 Very interesting... that says a lot. Sounds like they invaded this country from India in the distant past.
Stone age people advising a high tech modern civilization what could possibly go wrong!
Just another way for people disgusting themselves as helping them to fill their pockets with taxpayers money. Pretty much anything to do with aboriginals is pissed up the wall
The Australian voice in parliament ..Albo called it a ‘GROUP’ of advisors. Group, not one ????? How many in this group ? What race will this VOICE or GROUP be made up of ????? Who are these voices going to be appointed BY ..bunch of lunatics. THIS IS APARTHEID ….
Pushing a Republic through the back door!
No to apartheid
New Zealand's many mistakes are there to be learned from, Australia.
you cant learn anything when the people are lied to
@@kerrybarnes7289 yes you can
Though we were all equally that's how I was raised ,I am you are were all Australian
That was under liberal
How are the "Voice Representation"
Going to be elected?
How long will they hold office?
How will they be held to account?
What if they are guilty of corruption?
When do you think mainstream media will put this information out to the public. ???
NEVER!?
Giving less than 4% of the population, who have an axe to grind, a real 'voice' over the rest, is lunacy. Especially when the membership of the Voice will be Aboriginal activists. Their community isn't exactly a success, even with the billions thrown at it, so how the hell can they be given a say in the rest of the country? One activist was suggesting that non-Aboriginal property owners should pay rent to them, 'voluntarily', of course. 'Voluntarily', for now, until they get to make it mandatory, that is. One of the first items on the agenda will be reparations, I can almost guarantee it. Vote NO to the Voice, or YOU will end up voiceless!
Brilliant summary, should be shared across platforms
Well said.
WELL, you and your friends ought to be more careful about WHO YOU ELECT to government!
@@dabbbles *snort* As if I would vote for some weak virtue signalling fool like him..
No, no no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no
Not ever.
Fascists the whole loathsome mob
They are fascists. It is so strange we label the globalists as commies. These guys are so similar to the stazi.
I found this perfect quote on a forum - "If the legislation is successful and works it doesn't need to be in the constitution and if it needs to be in the constitution to ensure the legislation works (by disallowing the easy disbanding option) then maybe it shouldn't be because it is a failure"
Let the Aboriginal people have a referendum on whether they want it or not.
Albanese never sounds like he has any conviction regarding anything. It’s always, you know, she’ll be right, it’s the right thing to do, blah, blah, blah.
"We have a plan"
Ever wonder how things would've turned out if a sniper had taken out Hitler (who was also elected by a huge majority) in 1933? We've become too 'civilised'.
Andrew we love you! Keep telling it like it is.👊