Molten-Salt Reactor Forum - Thomas Jam Pederson, Ed McGinnis, and Rusty Towell @ TEAC11

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 53

  • @gordonmcdowell
    @gordonmcdowell  ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This took place on Day2 of TEAC11. www.patreon.com/thorium

    • @daniellarson3068
      @daniellarson3068 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks again Gordon.

    • @konradcomrade4845
      @konradcomrade4845 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey Gordon, here is what I want to bring to Your attention: th-cam.com/video/LgxztUsdZJ4/w-d-xo.html by Wisioner
      A (hybrid) thermonuclear reactor (research project) has been launched in Russia for the transmutation of Th --> U233 T-15 md mega Kurchatov Institute
      maybe tell John Kutsch, Kirk, and Ed Pheil about this new Russian project, too

    • @gordonmcdowell
      @gordonmcdowell  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@konradcomrade4845 Can you Tweet or email or comment a link to prose instead of that AI generated video? I'm not getting obvious results.

    • @konradcomrade4845
      @konradcomrade4845 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      somthing was blocked, so I try again
      A thermonuclear reactor has been launched in Russia from Wisioner on TH-cam 5 months ago
      this TH-cam is also going to be very interesting: Frank Shu speaks on the Astrophysics of Thorium Molten-salt Breeder Reactors TH-cam of Indian Acacemy... (I have not yet watched it completely)

    • @gordonmcdowell
      @gordonmcdowell  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@konradcomrade4845 thanks

  • @owluitar
    @owluitar ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It was nice to see someone running for the house of representatives not only attending an event like this, but participating in the dialogue and asking what States can do to help.

    • @eldermillennial8330
      @eldermillennial8330 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Shouldn’t that part time gimp that potato Joe put in charge of Nuclear Energy have been there?

  • @johnkutsch7609
    @johnkutsch7609 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So happy you got this out Gordon!

  • @EdPheil
    @EdPheil ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Yes, Ed McGuinness, now Curio, really loved Elysium's recycling concept, and decided to do that when he left government.

    • @konradcomrade4845
      @konradcomrade4845 ปีที่แล้ว

      have You read about the new problem in Fusion, ITER: due to out-of-specs fabrication, there were cracks, and the He caused additional corrosion of the cracks of the vacuum chamber! how can (hot?) Helium be corrosive to a metal? that is something new. another delay coming, because they have to disassemble parts.

  • @freetrade8830
    @freetrade8830 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It’s well over ten years since Kirk Sorensen popularized the MSR and nobody has bent a single piece of metal with the intention of putting it into a working machine.
    The reason why is alluded to in the video: policy. You’re not allowed to experiment with these things, so it’s impossible to figure out what will work.
    This is going nowhere until nuclear regulation is **dramatically** reduced or preferably abolished altogether.

  • @suchdevelopments
    @suchdevelopments ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks!

  • @andersemgard5229
    @andersemgard5229 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Red about this promising technique in
    the 1960s(!).
    Wishing McDowell great success in his
    important work.

    • @AllToDevNull
      @AllToDevNull ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm very sure you will find some coal/oil/gas lobby meeting with Nixon explaining him how this technology will destroy 100 thousands of worker jobs because it will be to cheap to compete. And then the financing of the demo reactor stopped.

  • @AlJay0032
    @AlJay0032 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Why don't the new companies just go to India, Brasil or somewhere else were the EU and the USA don't have their thumb on things to prevent progress?

  • @eldermillennial8330
    @eldermillennial8330 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am absolutely for this where it is both MOST Needed and SAFEST to use. No matter how safe the design, there should be areas that nuke shouldn’t go, regions that routinely have earthquakes above 5.0 shouldn’t have them, nor high tornado and hurricane zones.
    But there’s regions that simply don’t NEED them, wherever Icelandic style Geothermal is available, particularly Wyoming. The volcano can power us and the surrounding states EASILY using that system. So it’s eastern US east of Kansas and north of Georgia where most Nuclear plants should go. On in Washington and one in northern Texas away from the Gulf may be fine. Figure out a few other places ad we go, but the bulk in one area.

    • @gordonmcdowell
      @gordonmcdowell  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It is possible to design reactors to be earthquake tolerant. Japanese reactors survived the 2011 earthquake, it was the Tsunami which took out Fukushima, not the earthquake(s). And that was an old BWR.

    • @daniellarson3068
      @daniellarson3068 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      They put them on submarines and aircraft carriers. They've designed these things for seismic events for years. I think that concern will be and has been addressed.

  • @toddmarshall7573
    @toddmarshall7573 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    4:07: "...so far the block in this country is the NRC...": So do it in another country. There have to be dozens of countries in Africa to do it in.

    • @konradcomrade4845
      @konradcomrade4845 ปีที่แล้ว

      why Africa? North Korea may grab it; much more so!
      (me getting sarcastic? )

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie9551 ปีที่แล้ว

    "If wishes were horses, then beggars would ride", otherwise, there's an extreme need for patience.

    • @konradcomrade4845
      @konradcomrade4845 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've heard that one: if You donate a horse to a beggar, he will ride until the horse dies. I don't know, how to apply this one; maybe if some nation becomes so energy deficient, that nothing is left but to beg for energy, then this nation better be kept away from nuclear reactors?

    • @davidwilkie9551
      @davidwilkie9551 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@konradcomrade4845 you must be thinking of "the horse with no name"? Or is it "looking a gift horse in the mouth"?, because most people I know would immediately take the horse to feed and water.
      The obvious solution to global energy problems has been available for a long time, we should go looking for the appropriate people to implement the technology?

    • @williamgrimberg2510
      @williamgrimberg2510 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidwilkie9551Yes , but it’s better but not near the change we need right away if not for us but for our children and grandchildren. It’s hard to make the general public aware to insert new people if they just depend on corporate media who work only for the interest of the existing oil and coal and green energy companies and therefore are purposely slow on reporting and educating the public so they can keep their income and control as long as they can .

    • @konradcomrade4845
      @konradcomrade4845 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidwilkie9551 Neither, nor. the word "donate" is in the sense of "not selling the horse (to another farmer), but to give it away for free, to a poor man. What could the poor beggar do with a (valuable, but it needs feeding and care, too ) horse? This saying I heard as a kind of joke/wisdom was told in a German farmer's village. Your comment, above, reminded me of this old one!
      For the appropriate people I would certainly endorse Ed Pheil, more than the team that Bill Gates has set up.

  • @nigelpalmer9248
    @nigelpalmer9248 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why does an MSR need a moderator?

    • @adamdanilowicz4252
      @adamdanilowicz4252 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Breeding of thorium works better with moderated thermal neutrons, I believe.

    • @gordonmcdowell
      @gordonmcdowell  ปีที่แล้ว +8

      If you don't slow the neutrons with moderator, they're less likely to hit a nucleus. Without moderator you need more fissile because of this. A thermal-spectrum reactor is also easier to control because slowed neutron splitting an has (on average) a slight delay.

    • @EdPheil
      @EdPheil ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Thermal Thorium is 2.3 neuttons/fission, but fast is 2.5neutrons/fission. Also, in a fast spectrum fission product crossections go down faster than fission crossections, so the neutton fission to loss ratio is better, so less Fission Product cleaning costs.
      Yes, more fissile is needed to start up, but the same fissile is fissioned, so same fuel utilization.

    • @EdPheil
      @EdPheil ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No, fast spectrum is better, easier. See respinse to G McDowell below.

    • @EdPheil
      @EdPheil ปีที่แล้ว +3

      MSRs dont require a moderator, with fluoride salt & no moderator, they are intermediate spectrum, with chloride salt MSRs are fast soectrum.

  • @rcstann
    @rcstann ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ¹1¹st
    There are cities that have their own reactions.

  • @mrvaticanrag3946
    @mrvaticanrag3946 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You need an Elon Musk?

    • @catchnkill
      @catchnkill ปีที่แล้ว

      It does not make a difference. In US there is NRC. You need NRC approval for building and running a nuclear plant. Elon Musk here can't do anything with those NRC folks.

  • @winstonsmith2237
    @winstonsmith2237 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This technology is proven but all i see is talk talk talk... call ELON MUSK and get him on board and see your dream come true

    • @n3m37h
      @n3m37h ปีที่แล้ว

      But that doesn't involve destructive mining and badly treated workers. Also Elon has no liquid money and he needs to pay creditors (1.5 bil/yr) for his BRILLIANT idea to buy twitter. I'd rather that trash heap stay away then implode the entire industry

    • @gordonmcdowell
      @gordonmcdowell  ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Winston, search for: US NRC accepts application for molten salt research reactor ...that's Nov 24th fresh news. As Rusty will say in his talk later, they're aiming for 2025 for their fissioning research reactor. Mark Nelson is aiming for 2025 fuelling commercial reactors with Thorium+HALEU fuel. As nice as it would be to have Elon Musk take a stab at this... he seems kinda busy, and perhaps leveraged?

    • @quinto190
      @quinto190 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There are several companies moving on this, fortunately.

    • @dragonslayer6000
      @dragonslayer6000 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gordonmcdowell historically, political leveraging against throrium technology has occurred since it's discovery.

    • @spoonikle
      @spoonikle ปีที่แล้ว

      Elon would turn it into vapor and smoke and 99x talk and a dude in a body suit pretending to be a robot “Our AI Robot system reduces operating costs and ensures security” and claiming its already powering every home in Dubai right now!
      Pump the stock price! Pump it!! Not that the company can actually do anything with that money. Stocks are already sold, their in private hands and the company cant sell the stocks they hold or they risk “hostile take over” and a massive drop in share price. Stock market is a casino for the rich, IPO’s are where the money is raised - the stock is all in the companies hands and sold to investors as trading cards or collectable toys… but for rich people! Sure you are entitled to a “vote” and “dividend payments” but not all the time! Stocks have various privileges based on the companies corporate bylaws - which can be changed. The primary real values of stocks can suddenly dissapear with many companies not even offering dividends anymore!!!
      Currently Elon musk has pissed away more money in 1 year than anyone else in the history of the world. Tesla stock is down more than 50% and none of his companies earn anything.
      Pension funds, retirement, personal investments. Millions of working people investing for retirement have lost billions due to Elon Musks childish tantrums this year. His JOB was to be a cheer leader funnuling money into the capable hands of enginners to make cool stuff - instead hes a conman who lies to millions and then sells 9 billion dollars in stocks.
      Now he can burn the companies and walk away with a bottomless bank account and 0 liability.

  • @lsauce45
    @lsauce45 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey @gordonmcdowell ! If you're free , if they don't mind , ask them to periodically share the status of their prototype (at least) reactor.

  • @MrTommyboy68
    @MrTommyboy68 ปีที่แล้ว

    While I am a big proponent of Thorium, I can't believe that one of the goals is to produce power "to cheap to meter". I remember THAT line from back in the day and look where we are at with pricing. AND with the large unprotected amounts of HIGHLY RADIOACTIVE WASTE we are accumulating, I don't see ANY progress being made to safely reprocess or store this for at LEAST 2 if not more generations. We are still at the old "kick the can down the road" mentality with ALL INVOLVED KNOWING they will be dead and buried and able to escape the wrath of upset citizens (unless they are going to dig your bones up and toss THEM into a reactor.)
    And for the second gentleman to claim WE can make most of the components here in the USA, I highly doubt it and the prices would be ASTRONOMICAL. We CANNOT build ANYTHING CHEAPLY here in the USA mainly due to greed. Foreign car manufacturers here can't even get QUALIFIED, SKILLED WORKERS here. Our days of being a leader in manufacturing are LONG GONE. Where are you going to find the workers with the skills necessary to safely run complex machinery? Machine shops can't even get someone to run a CNC machine that is basically automated. The dumbing down of America has taken it's toll.
    Sorry, I'll get off my soap box now.

  • @lsauce45
    @lsauce45 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey @gordonmcdowell ! If you're free , if they don't mind , ask them to periodically share the status of their prototype (at least) reactor.

    • @gordonmcdowell
      @gordonmcdowell  ปีที่แล้ว

      Copenhagen Atomics? They've got a TH-cam channel I'd check that for any lab tour they might have posted.