Since making this video experts on meteoritic air bursts have begun to question if the site was was destroyed by one. If further research reveals the site was not destroyed by an air burst this video will be removed: retractionwatch.com/2021/10/01/criticism-engulfs-paper-claiming-an-asteroid-destroyed-biblical-sodom-and-gomorrah/
@@roerich1848 Who is Dr Falk? And what evidence does he offer to make that conclusion? Collins has been doing archeology for decades and has the only certified college of biblical archeology in the US. The evidence that Tall el Hammam is Sodom is overwhelming and is being accepted by the archeological community as more and more evidence is found. It is in the right place, north of the Dead Sea on the plain of the Jordan. Exactly where the bible cleary says it should be. Tehep is also in the right time. And Tehep also has exactly what one would expect to find after the destruction of Sodom. Right place, Right time, and Right stuff. And there is no other site that fits the biblical narrative of Sodom.
@@nahshon9998 _”Collins is a certified archeologist”_ at time stamp of the video 7:57, he says the temperature exceeds 6,000 degrees Celsius…… Do you even know what that means? It is literally one of the most scientifically illiterate things I’ve ever heard, THE SURFACE OF THE SUN is 5,500 degrees Celsius, at HALF that temperature, the city as well as the region would melt into a puddle…. This alone should suffice enough that your “certified archeologist” wouldn’t be able to tell his reflection in the mirror, let alone be certified for anything. Plus, you saying Collins is the ONLY one who is “certified” for the field of biblical archeology just goes to show how the majority of others believe that what the Bible says and actual archeological findings couldn’t be any more different and rarely correlate, for example, no archeologist or scholar believes that the origin of different languages started because God punished the Babylonians for building the tower of Babel.
@@nahshon9998 of course all you have is empty rhetoric with little substance or sources, examples include the fact that in the video, it was not a physician who made the claim about the outrageous temperature, but Collins himself, as well as the fact that just by simply doing the most bare minimum of research concerning this topic, you would find the majority of sites, both respected and shady, have their doubts about this finding(with the exception of Christian one’s of course), which would indicate that there is no unanimous agreement as you claim as well. It’s pretty obvious that you only go to biased sources only to reaffirm your own belief’s and promote intellectual dishonesty, saying that every “biblical archeology” has been uncovered is just simply wrong, and I think deep down you know that too, have they found Babel? Do linguists agree that different languages started because God punished Babylon for building Babel? Noah’s ark? I challenge you to find these “findings” in a neutral source and not one that is clearly biased. Speaking of biased, please do research on which University Collins comes from and see their guidelines, a Christian college that refuses to hear any criticism and label those who do as bullies, because of course Christians do love their prosecution complex…. Stop talking like a psychiatrist, just because I have the ability to be critical to buffoonery does not mean that I hate anyone or anything….
True, also, for those who say the Bible is a fairytale, how many fairy tales have tablets as proof of their events, scrolls (most famously the Dead Sea scrolls), what about prophecies? Not to mention historians like Celsus, Mara Bara Serpion, Talmud, Cornelius Tacitus, and many more 👀.
@@ShalemAhava Pliny the Younger, Julius Africanus, Thallus (who Julius Africanus quotes), Josephus and ofcourse all the successors of the Apostles (The Church Fathers)
@@ShalemAhava The existence of real events does not prove the supernatural elements or the theological message, a story can be placed in and based on real events without being true. Lets say that Sodom and Gomorrah really were destroyed by a firey explosion from space, so what? It gives us no evidence towards whether this was really from God, whether the characters in the story and the specifics of their actions ever happened. The idea that people were taking real events and ascribing supernatural meaning and making theological claims using these as the backdrop is really not a particularly far-fetched one.
@@youngyvidz716 Well I think you might have a wrong interpretation what he is trying to show it was by Genesis so far is recording history we may never know if someone of these people existed like Abraham,But the evidence he does show so far shows a pretty good documentation of ancient history End it shows a Hebrews kept a good amount of ancient history no one can truly know if the theology is true or not but at least we know that some of these things could’ve happened no one can truly know if it ever did released a good evidence that they kept a good record of things. We should really wait till he does the exodus documentary
A few "tiny" issues. Supposedly, Sodom was destroyed just 11 generations after the Biblical Flood killed all but 8 people on Earth. To get even 500,000 on Earth by this time would have required population expansion 1000 percent faster than the speed of what archaeologists believe was possible at this time! But strangely, there are over 500,000 a bodies at Bab Ed-Dhra from this period alone already. Tall El-Hammam may have been destroyed by a meteor like the one in Siberia recently, but people who have no clue about the science of such events were likely to make up a supernatural tale to explain its occurrence. There is a geography fail according to Bill Shlegel -- Biblical literalist -- the Biblical text does not actually fit the geography of Tall el-Hammam. But more problematically, there is a chronology fail. Eugene Merrill (Biblical Literalist) states that for Tall El-Hammam to be Sodom one must deny all of the Biblical Dates before the time of the judges. Even Christian excavators say the site of Tall El-Hammam shows signs of continuous occupation going back 2500 years before the date of its destruction... but... there was a flood that killed all but 8 human beings just 11 generations before that. People were flourishing here at least a couple of hundred years before Young Earth creationists claim the Earth was created. ALl kinds of problems for a literal interpretation of the Bible here.
@lol lol Nah, the Biblical account is extremely accurate pertaining to human history, then on top of this the phrophecies that were fulfilled. Look at the book of isaiah predicting the coming of Jesus, we know now it was written before his birth thanks to the dead sea scrolls. Then look at the genetic evidence. We all descend from TWO people , the Thaler & Stoekle study found this out. Then we found out we all descend from three mtDNA lineages (Noahs 3 sons). The Bible has never been scientifically contradicted. I mean this goes much deepee but the Bible is very accurate.
Discovering sodom is by far my favorite book of biblical archeology, it reads so well, takes you to the sites and follows the discovery process mentally.. so worth your time. Also I had no idea what a headache it is to find human remains anywhere in a potentially Muslim country, it gives you a deeper appreciation for those scholars that weild the shovels.
In the year 2024 BC, two Angeles appeared to Abraham at the door of his encampment and told him to leave because they were sent to destroy the wicked cities of the plains. All Bible students and church goers know the story of Lot and his wife wife and family being given time to get away into the hills and told not to look back. Lot's wife was not turned in to a pillar of salt. She was disintegrated by the nuclear blast. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not the first cities destroyed by nuclear weapons, Sodom and Gomorrah and other cities of that region were. Check out the Sumerian cuneiform writings, which tell the same story and are older than the Torah and the rest of the Biblical writings.
@@geraldv.greening5719 the assumption that a story is older is based on the presumption that any dialectic content of an older dated manuscript or tablet precedes one allegedly younger. This is not necessarily the case. All counterfeit are an homage to the authentic.
"Discovering Sodom" was written by Steven Collins and Latayne Scott. That book refutes what this site claims. Collins' site is on the plain of the Jordan river, north of the Dead Sea. This video is claiming that Sodom is at the south end of the Dead Sea. This site is incorrect. Read Genesis 13:8-11. It clearly says that Sodom is East of Bethel and Ai. That puts Sodom on thh plain of the Jordan, north of the Dead Sea.
The idea of Lots wife getting turned into a pillar of salt always brought to mind a 'natural' event for me anyway. I think of the remains at Pompeii. Being coated with minerals in a blast.
@@11kravitzn The exact phrase in Hebrew "looked back" is only used 1 other place, 2 Chr. 13:14. To describe a battle behind someone. Not really enough to tell us her physical orientation to her husband and others. It apparently placed her at a more vulnerable vantage point.
@@11kravitzn I also think it was miraculous. Just perhaps in a more Providential way, because of the method of destruction being so similar to some very rare natural occurrences. Another example would be God using a strong wind to part the Red Sea.
@@Jim-Mc Hey Jim is this pretty of topic but in June I’m soon going to debate a Muslim on the crucifiction and I wondered if you could help find scholar or sources Wich says that Jesus was crucified. Plus how do I respond to a Muslim when he says that Jesus was not crucified but instead Judas was 🤔
I've head that the phrase turned into a pillar of salt is actually a idiom for dying of fear, because the person turns white like salt. It's theorised that when she looked back the sight of what was happening caused such fear that she died instantly. It's an interesting perspective.
I am not surprised that people don't believe this discovery despite the Bible describing the locations. The devil was always going to do everything possible to discredit it. Even the Bible warns of the devices of the devil. May God have mercy. I wouldn't want to say more because due experience of being insulted and disrespected when sharing thoughts and opinions about Bible archeological discoveries by people towards other people. God bless.🙏🏽
@@randyg.7940 That doesn't logically follow to, "none of them are the real place," though. What is does logically follow to is, "We need to look at the evidence to find out if any of the sites are the real Sodom and Gomorrah"
Fairytales? No. Myths? Most likely. The ancient Jews were likely describing incredible situations orally for thousands of years before they were actually written down. With that many centuries of playing telephone, it was more than likely they’d write down some pretty crazy stuff. The end of the ice age suddenly becomes Noah’s flood, an earthquake taking down the Ziggurat of Eridu becomes God smiting down the Tower of Babel, and the flooding of a popular settling area where the Red Sea is today, becomes the banishment from Eden. These people were describing situations in the only way they truly knew how. With legends, gods, spirits, and myths. This doesn’t mean, suddenly, that God is real.
@@randyg.7940 If the Bible was made to control people I'd rather listen to what it said than anything else. I mean, the media today won't tell me monogamy is good, lower pleasures are evil, and I can live a lifetime of happiness
In 2007, when I was helping with the ESV Study Bible maps and charts, our cartography and other experts on staff also agreed with your location, though in the end, I put a (?) mark next to it since our work was still very close to the excavations of el-Hammam and the results were not published or clear yet. But it's looking pretty solid at this point, over 10 years later. Thank you for your work on this.
@@InspiringPhilosophy I have done a great deal of work with several study Bibles. On this one, I was part of the initial team that developed the scope and features and details of the project, then went on to work with the cartographer, scholars, and artists in helping get maps and charts and objects rendered properly. Part of my spade work was doing all the annotations that accompanies maps, charts, and objects. I also did the initial rendering of most of the objects and 3d maps. It was a real challenge and a lot of fun.
@lol lol Your criticism is juvenile at best, proven by your language. .Do you actually believe that those involved in such projects not once considered such?
@Odhe Precious yes it true Earth is not 6000 year old and can you give me any bible verse that's says it is and Adam and Eve are allegorical have you ever heard of theistic evolution? Lol
@huberkrypto When did the bible say it was "6000 years ago"? Or that it was even 6 days old? How do we know what days mean? The beggining of Genesis was just a story talking about how God created the universe. There is many evidence that the flood happenned in multiple places. It might not have been as global as the bible says. But there was still a massive flood. Locally or Globally. You guys only cling on to the "debunking" of Adam and Eve and the Flood when you are reading and studying it all wrong.
@@INFINITUMSPIRIT Archaeology is a double-edged sword. If it can prove the Bible, it can also disprove it, and once Christians have brought it up in support of their doctrines, they cannot then discard it as soon as its conclusions become inconvenient to them. And in recent decades, as more evidence emerges, it has turned increasingly against them. A more complete picture of the history of ancient Israel has surfaced, one that brings out in sharp relief which parts of the Old Testament are historical and which parts are not. The Exodus may represent a distorted folk memory of Egypt and the Hyksos. Sometime between 2000 and 1500 BC, the possibly Semitic people called Hyksos “invaded” Egypt. It was more like a mass immigration than a military conquest, but they managed to wind up running the place somehow, until the Egyptians rose up and forcibly expelled the Hyksos. The Judeans of the 640-609 BC time frame, aka the Josianic Era (ie when King Josiah reigned) had a dim memory of this, and had a love-hate relationship with Egypt, which was alternately an ally and enemy of Judah. Many Judeans emigrated to Egypt to look for work, much as the Hyksos had 1000 years earlier. The Judean priests then made up a story by combining the ancient fact of the Hyksos with the modern politics of Judah. It introduced Joseph and his brothers, and basically said that the ancestors of the Judeans were the Hyksos who had lived in Egypt. During the reign of Josiah, who attempted to conquer the land north of Judah, which was formerly the kingdom of Israel, the priests came up with the idea that Israel and Judah had once been a united kingdom, with Judah’s own heroes David and Solomon ruling the place from Jerusalem. They attributed several lavish cities and monuments in Israel and Judah to these two, but in reality these monuments were built in Israel about 100 years after the time of Solomon, and they were built by King Omri’s family. During the Babylonian Exile, the captive priests added a new wrinkle to the Egypt story. The Hebrews had been slaves in Egypt until they revolted with divine assistance, and made a great Exodus to the Promised Land of Canaan, which became the lands of Israel and Judah. The problem is, the Exodus can only have happened in the window of 1500-1200 BC, and throughout that time Canaan was an Egyptian province, full of Egyptian peacekeeping troops. The slaves would have only been running from one Egypt to another. What happened is, the priests writing the story treated Egypt with the geography it had during the Josianic Era. This is reflected in the Joseph story, where the Egyptian vizier accuses the Israelite immigrants of being spies from the east, whereas at the time they would have been from a land which Egypt already owned. All the Egyptian cities mentioned in Genesis and Exodus existed in the Josianic Era, but most of them were founded after the latest possible date for the Exodus. It would be as if someone wrote a story where King James sent John Smith to America, and Smith checked in at the ports of Boston, New York, and Washington. The reference in Exodus that Hebrew slaves built the city of Ramesses has created the impression (popularised by Hollywood, so let it be written, so let it be done) that Ramses II was the Pharaoh of the Exodus, or perhaps the Pharaoh of the Oppression. We know that his son Merneptah wrote a letter in 1207 BC telling how he had defeated Israel among a list of Canaanites, so the Exodus must be before then if it really happened. The Exodus pointedly refuses to name the Pharaohs in its story, presumably because the writers didn’t know the names of any Pharaohs in the relevant time period. Jericho and other Canaanite cities did not have walls at the time, as they were in a fairly peaceful Egyptian province. The great ruins of Canaanite cities were not made all at one time, but are from numerous invasions in different centuries. Some were destroyed by Greek pirates, not Joshua’s Israelites. Abraham’s story is similarly full of anachronisms, like referring to the province of Dan and the presence of Philistines.
@King King Genocide is the systematic harm and killing of a specific ethnic, national, social, religious group for such specifics. The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah does not fit that criteria. It was capital punishment for people who consistently performed vile actions. They were egotistical, greedy, unwilling to help others, and rapists.
The Bible is big book and has thousands of stories, if a random story like this can be proved or even can correlate with scientific findings like this this well then at least there must be some truth to it testimony and I believe we should look at it as more than just a religious book. I am compelled to believe.
Many atheists and agnostic historians have stated that stories in the bible align with historical events and many sources outside the bible supporting it.
It's eerie how much actual historical evidence there is even for the stories accounted to the old testament. An Old Book, but a goodie, I read on the subject matter was called "The Bible as History" the advances in biblical archealogy from those times to now... even so the book records an incredible detail of all sorts of historical facts, whether divine in nature or no, the Bible is almost a first hand account of Bronze Age Hebrews! Followed up by Early Christianity... it's an astonishing thing.
Apparently you haven't really studied history and religious texts. There is no such thing as a god, of any religion. Religions were created for manipulation and control. The stars were the heavens and anything mystical was from 'god'. There are scientific evidences of things happening from these religious texts. What kind of person would worship a god that allows all the unnecessary suffering in the world from innocent individuals (esp. children)?? I would never worship any god like that. Any religious text is just a fictiona writing with some realistic references so that it's believeable. No different than what's out there now.
@@the2ndQT If there was truly no meaning behind the universe, then we should have never found out that there was no meaning. Just like if there was no light in the universe, we would have never knew what is dark. The word "dark" would be completely meaningless.
I believe in faith what the Bible says. But, I'm always excited by evidence that exposes the biblical accounts as TRUE!! As always, you did an excellent job introducing and breaking down the technical points. Thank you!! I look forward to what's next 💯!!
So you believe in your god committing genocide advocating murder stoning of children misogyny incest and slavery to name a few. Your faith is misguided.
@@borisbash Do you even have 2 brain cells? God destroyed a city that was so famous for a word that was named after them. Sodomy. because they would sodomize everyone. i think their punishment was well deserved. or are you one of those people that believes serial killers and rapists deserve to be treated with kindness?
That are in much, much higher concentration than anywhere else on Earth. Some scientists tried to dismiss the sulfur balls as possibly being from space, which is kinda accurate considering it did rain brimstone that day.
@@statutesofthelord a meteor exploding above the ground sending a large shockwave, with fire and rocks coming down, would be like “fire and brimstone.”
Thanks for that - “Blessed are those who have not seen, and have believed.” - Still it sure is nice when the evidence jumps into place, matching that faith ☺️
@Andrew Harper thanks for your comment Andrew. I understand the basics of many of these and see no contradiction within God’s incredible design. I have alsoseen as much pointing out the flaws in the evolution theory as I have the reverse. Even Darwin noted such. But I don’t have the skills to change your mind so I will pray that you come to faith in your time. God loves you and wants you to know Him. Take care and thanks again. 😊
@Fred Smith theories that are established science now are not necessarily truth. A flat world used to be established science. The sun revolving around the world used to be established science. I am content that established science is wrong and the bible is right. Again though, I respect you see things differently at the moment and though I pray you change your mind, you have the freedom to choose to believe whatever you wish to believe.
@Fred Smith Thanks for taking the time to answer so extensively. There are obviously claims and counter claims as there is in anything that is so hotly debated. however, what is at the heart of the Christian faith, is just that. Faith. Faith in a loving true God and faith that no matter what we have done, forgiveness is there, freely offered to those who want it through Jesus. I won't persuade you of this, but I do hope that in time God does. Take care and thanks.
👏👏👏Another great archeology video, IP; I like how you seem to be focusing on Genesis, which many secular historians would like to say contradicts history. God bless!
They go predominantly after Genesis because they know it’s the foundation the rest of the bible is built on. In other words by trying to knock down the foundation the rest of the book collapses. Unfortunately for them archeological, prophecy and manuscript evidence keeps going against them lol.
This video tries to disprove Genesis. Actually, God says he sent fire and brimstone on these cities, not some meteor. Check out Ron Wyatt's videos for the true locations of Sodom and Gomorrah.
@@statutesofthelord Did you even watch the video? All meteors contain high amounts of brimstone (sulfur) and the airburst of the meteor would have caused extremely devastating fires. IP does NOT try and disprove genesis.
@@user-ps7ij6ge6d Genesis 19:24 Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven; But this video says otherwise. Is God in error, or is this video in error?
I'm very much interested in Biblical archæology and my mind wandered away from the sermon the other day, and I started wondering if any such evidence had been found. This is SO fascinating and awesome!!
There is evidence, like the walls of Jericho, never happened, the Bible is not historical. Religion is in your mind, there’s very little proof. These very intelligent people which wrote these stories has very little knowledge of the facts, the population was 95% illiterate. The Rabbis didn’t want the truth as in Christianity the leaders of the Church. They wanted control.
One thing I learned in college was that our definitions of the cardinal directions were different to the ancient Hebrews. They viewed it to the side, where north and south were east and west, respectively. Not sure how well this fits in, because in that case Sodom would've been north. I think this explanation fits much better, but I never was able to confirm or deny that about directions in the ancient Levant
The bible may be just a boring book to many, but to us, it's our history, our real history, the word of God is real, Jesus really did exist, and still does, all the proof of the Bible is so ancient its either buried in the sands or withered away, but it's There! Still there, and it's real! No matter how many deny it.
Sheeeeesh you’re proving biblical events left and right. Are you ever going to talk about the documentary hypothesis? It seems like an interesting topic.
@@postmodpen1169 There’s a ton of variations of it, but the most basic view is that the Five Books of Moses (Pentateuch) were compiled from at least four different sources: the J source Jahwist, the E or Elohist source, the D for Deuteronomist, and P for the priestly source. They contend that all of these basic sources were at one point separate sources that were compiled together sometime around the Babylonian exile. It goes by other names such as the JEDP theory or the Graf/Wellhausen Theory. Julius Wellhausen is considered the father of the documentary hypothesis. The theory really blew up because of his work in the latter half of the 19th century.
@@thegoofypaladin715 still, it's just simply a hypothesis till now, it's never proven to be true a hypothesis will never be considered true or fact again, it's still a hypothesis
Not a theist, but I am a historian and im impressed with the argument here, well done! This theory may easily be confirmed through independent geological tests. This is not to say, however, that the israelite account is accurate. A meteor hitting a city in nearly any culture would be interpreted as the will of a god or devil of some sort. Theology is often used to explain unusual natural phenomena and evidence that could differentiate the natural from the supernatural would be necessary to substantiate religious claims
@@InspiringPhilosophy I don't know. Between you and a few other sources, I've seen more than enough to demonstrate that the Bible is historically reliable. Under those circumstances, archeology might do more to prove the Bible than you think. In either case, it's certainly a great tool to be used toward that end. I've watched your videos off and on for the last few years, and am always impressed with the amount of leg work you put into each one. You work has actually formed the basis for more than one of my apologetic arguments, so keep up the good work, sir.
@@InspiringPhilosophy We can't "prove" _any_ historical account, Biblical or not, with the kind of certainty afforded by the empiral sciences, logic and math. However, it is frustrating to see how often many skeptics go about an archaeological double standard; if they don't think the evidence here and in other places is good enough, why not just trash the whole of recorded history already?
Responding to the issues raised by @YoungyVidz below: "The existence of real events does not prove the supernatural elements or the theological message" -- But is this proof that the 'supernatural' aspect of the story is false? I expect you would say, 'no, not necessarily.' We agree then. "The fact that it (possibly) is an accurate account of natural phenomena in no way validates its supernatural claims" -- But is this state of affairs proof that the 'supernatural' claim is false? Again, i expect your response is 'no, not necessarily.' We again agree. "The supernatural claim will always be less likely than a naturalistic claim" - Or are you really saying this, 'no supernatural claim is ever true, ergo, all supernatural claims are false--including the story of God's judgment on Sodom'. Is this REALLY what you're saying if you're being forthright about it? Let's take a closer look: 1. The Bible talks about the ancient cities of Sodom and Gomorrah - Say, this is more true than not. 2. The Bible gives accurate locations where the cities are located - Say, this is more true than not. 3. The Bible says that both cities were destroyed by a cataclysmic event - Data suggests more true than not. 4. The biblical narrative says that it's due to the judgment of God. Now, say 1, 2, and 3 are more true than not (more or less accurate/consistent with the facts/available data). What do we do with #4? This is where one's a priori worldview commitments play a critical epistemic role. >A committed naturalist (put here hardcore secularist, atheist, antitheist, et al), even if he fully agrees with 1, 2, and 3, of course would conclude #4 as utterly false, even without any analysis of the argument! Why? Simply because God and the supernatural are utterly outside of his plausibility structure and therefore epistemologically and ontologically unacceptable--ANY explanation is better than God and the supernatural (no matter how highly unlikely that explanation is). This is a species of 'paradigm dictating on the data/argument', ie., the axiom will simply dismiss any and all ideas outside of its rigid, illegitimate boundary. But this is a fallacy. A truly intellectually honest position (consistent with the spirit of genuine science, philosophical inquiry, and human curiosity) would be open to where evidence (from other relevant fields of inquiry that will have bearing on the truthfulness, or lack of, of the biblical account) points to--supernatural or not. I recall a professor, who was a committed naturalist-atheist, once said to his students in class, 'Even if i see a limb grow right before my very eyes--like a complete leg growing in a matter of seconds right in front of me--i will still reject the miraculous. I will always look for a natural explanation.' Well, sure prof. It's a free country.
Its just a burned citty, its not like a thing incredible our impossible. Specially to a region where warfare happaned in every time and place. If it was destroyed by meteors we need to find the meteor rock and cratera, thing we dosent found. "Sky fire" can be some Fire whirl, a completly natural fenomena, the bible is the mounth to mouth account of a pretty superticious people which found divine intervetion or demonic attacks in every thing all this in the time lapse of centuries.
If someone were to be intellectually honest then they wouldn't be able to be Christian, or at least accept the Bible, its filled with utter nonsense forcing believers to have to use apologetics to justify or have believers who are complete idiots like Flat-Earthers or Young Earth Creationists.
You're making a lot of leaps. The point of saying "The presence of X does not prove supernatural intervention" is not an attempt to disprove the claims of supernatural intervention, it is to point out that you are making a substantial jump. Second of all, saying "Natural explanations are more likely than supernatural events" is not equivalent to saying "supernatural events don't happen". That's a blatant strawman. It's stating that we have demonstrable and verifiable evidence of the natural, and only inferences based on burned down cities and ancient texts for the supernatural. Furthermore, I'm willing to bet that some part of the documentation of the site was misrepresented to a degree, to leave out aspects which contradict. Like the fact that the city has signs of occupation for 2000 years prior, which would merge with Noah's flood. If we're looking at all the evidence, one has to go.
@David Davison No one was killed without a reason, as Genesis 18:26-33 put it: ‘So the Lord said, “If I find in Sodom fifty righteous within the city, then I will spare all the place for their sakes.” Then Abraham answered and said, “Indeed now, I who am but dust and ashes have taken it upon myself to speak to the Lord: Suppose there were five less than the fifty righteous; would You destroy all of the city for lack of five?” So He said, “If I find there forty-five, I will not destroy it.” And he spoke to Him yet again and said, “Suppose there should be forty found there?” So He said, “I will not do it for the sake of forty.” Then he said, “Let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak: Suppose thirty should be found there?” So He said, “I will not do it if I find thirty there.” And he said, “Indeed now, I have taken it upon myself to speak to the Lord: Suppose twenty should be found there?” So He said, “I will not destroy it for the sake of twenty.” Then he said, “Let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak but once more: Suppose ten should be found there?” And He said, “I will not destroy it for the sake of ten.” So the Lord went His way as soon as He had finished speaking with Abraham; and Abraham returned to his place.’
Why do you bless someone for trying to disprove the Bible? God says in Genesis 19:24 "Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven;" Contrary to what this video says, the brimstone has already been found, around 40 years ago, by Ron Wyatt. Look at his videos if you want to know the truth.
@@MrChristK Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven; Genesis 19:24. God says He rained brimstone and fire. This video says a meteor did it. They cannot both be correct.
@@statutesofthelord If a meteor contains sulfur (brimstone) and flaming, melting rocks burning at a very high temperature (fire), then it is the exact same thing. Now let me ask you, who controls nature and can send a meteor to fall on the cities of the plain? The LORD can manipulate nature however He pleases.
Yess he did destroy Sodom n gomorrah by fire. Many people speak like Sodom n gomorrah is the world. No, many more destruction may further occur. Including a bigger one at the last to destroy all the world. May the name of Trinity be higher and more praised. Amen.
Considering Lots wife, I've head that the phrase "turned into a pillar of salt" is actually a idiom for dying of fear, because the person turns white like salt. It's theorised that when she looked back the sight of what was happening it caused such fear that she died instantly. It's an interesting perspective. And provides a naturalistic explanation. Though I don't know if it is true that it is an idiom.
@@IsraelCountryCube I didn't say that. I was just offering an alternative perspective that has a more naturalistic explanation. That doesn't make it more or less true. If she genuinely tuned into a Piller of salt or if it was a sudden death from fear that wouldn't change the fact the Bible is true.
The Lord rebuke the demons in this reply section. Satan deceives all the nations and deceived you Jason, Revelation 12:9 “So the great dragon was cast out, that serpent of old, called the Devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was cast to the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.” Glory to the Lord Jesus Christ, only by Him we can be saved! God bless
There are other potential sites besides the two mentioned at the beginning of the video. But we know that at least four cities were destroyed, and we don't know exactly how close together they were. Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, and Zeboiim. It is also likely that a fifth city, Zoar is among the ruins. So even if the site in the video isn't Sodom, we still have at least three or four possibilities, which would all point to the same event. This could be Admah. Or Zeboiim. Whichever, the story in Genesis is proven true! I want to also briefly point out that "left" and "right" in middle eastern reckoning (and Hebrew is particular) mean "north" and "south." In modern times we are used to thinking of north as "up." But that wasn't always so. Originally, east was up; the direction of the rising of the sun, and also the direction of the spin of the earth. East = forward; West = behind; North = left; South = right.
Wherever, natural oil deposits are found so is sulphur in its pure form. It is also abundant wherever volcanic activity took place. It's the tenth most abundant element in the universe.
If Wyatt’s sub-Masada site’s destruction can be chronologically correlated with the destruction at the Tel el-Hammam site north of the Dead Sea then it’s possible they BOTH mark the same meteoric event. A high sulfur-content meteor already ablaze and dripping a spray of molten sulfur behind it down onto the ground below could have passed over Wyatt’s site first then continued on the remaining 35 miles northeast as the crow flies to ‘detonate’ over the northern site, where the debris field blast pattern reportedly indicates the meteor indeed approached from the southwest. I’ve speculated myself that the high purity of the sulfur nodules found at Wyatt’s site may be due to the meteor involved in this event having been a chunk of surface material blasted off of Jupiter’s moon Io at some point in the past by a prior meteoric event there. That chunk would have had to escape the Jovian system and found its way eventually to Earth, etc. Tidally stressed/heated by its close orbit around Jupiter, Io has volcanoes erupting various allotropes of sulfur onto its surface at the present time, and those allotropes are apparently what gives Io’s surface its characteristic “diseased piece of fruit” (Carl Sagan’s words) appearance. It would be interesting to see if some future robotic sample-collection mission to Io could verify a match in the purity/chemical profile of the surface sulfur there with that of the sulfur nodules found at Wyatt’s site below Masada. Not likely to happen, but it would be interesting to do such a comparison.
@@ChipsAplentyBand Ron Wyatt was a hack. He had zero training as an archeologist. No post secondary degree. He's been debunked by everyone in the profession as well as every leading biblical scholar. Every claim he has made has been discredited.
@@dominicpardo4783 I hope you'll notice that I made no statement supporting Ron Wyatt's claim to have found Sodom and/or Gomorrah at the site below Masada. I personally think the Tel el-Hammam site northeast of the Dead Sea is a FAR better candidate for their location, both in terms of the biblical text and in terms of the physical evidence laid out in Dr. Collins' book, which I have read. When I referenced the Wyatt site I did so to talk about the presence of the sulfur nodules found there. My point was that finding that high purity sulfur in that location is ALSO CONSISTENT with a meteoric event in which the meteor approached from the southwest direction, which was Dr. Collins' own proposal for how the cities were destroyed. So my comment was posted in support of Dr. Collins' meteoric event explanation for the destruction of S & G, and was not posted as 'cheerleading' for Mr. Wyatt's choice of site for either/both cities. A crucial piece of the puzzle that's still missing, so far as I know, is whether the site below Masada and the presence of its sulfur nodules dates to the same time period as the destruction at Tel el-Hammam or not. If you know of information that bears on that question I would be interested to examine it.
@@ChipsAplentyBand The site does NOT show evidence of a singular cataclysmic conflagration. It instead shows evidence of two millennia of continuous habitation. The burials show three distinct styles of internment directly correlated with the social and religious constructs of the time. It is rather the rule than the exception that ancient cities were burned when sacked, and during the period, the region was under siege by several contentious civilizations.
Ron wyatt found the cities of the plains decades ago. He also found the real mount sinai with the alter at the bottom with cows etched all over it. And found noah's ark and the red sea crossing.
He also found bones of the Giants, and Ark of the covenant and was visited few times by angels, and most of the things he did and found (like the golden chariot wheels and the tests of Christs blood and chromosomes) are now lost
Fantastic video! Love Dr. Steve Collins and his work at Tall el-Hammam! So glad this site is finally getting more attention. Also, FYI that Ai is pronounced “eye” and “Kikkar” is pronounced “kik-KAR” 😊
@@lrcavalli290 We all have faith in something, scientists say many things that people just take by faith like the history of the earth and even the universe when those scientist's have no greater lifespan than anyone else and their conclusions are just faith on scientists that were before them. The age of things are partly based and the distance of things in space but that makes some assumptions that the speed of light and the expansion of space has always been the same.
@@danielaplet4036 the speed of light always remains the same... relatively depends on it... unfortunately faith doesn't,and can't equal facts... faith is based on feelings,and that's not in any way, shape,or form,the truth of anything...life as we know it runs on facts,not faith...for example...I go to work to get paid,to pay my bills...those are facts...now I could just stay home and have faith that somehow my bills will get paid, somehow...but that more than likely wouldn't happen... religion is like gambling... you're hoping and have faith that there's a God, even though you've never seen him,or heard him,and you don't actually know if he's there,but you have faith,and hope that he is
I have never run into an individual who is thoughtless to how I am suffering. I have expressed myself in full and yet ignored. It is not I who started it.
A few "tiny" issues. Supposedly, Sodom was destroyed just 11 generations after the Biblical Flood killed all but 8 people on Earth. To get even 500,000 on Earth by this time would have required population expansion 1000 percent faster than the speed of what archaeologists believe was possible at this time! But strangely, there are over 500,000 a bodies at Bab Ed-Dhra from this period alone already. Tall El-Hammam may have been destroyed by a meteor like the one in Siberia recently, but people who have no clue about the science of such events were likely to make up a supernatural tale to explain its occurrence. There is a geography fail according to Bill Shlegel -- Biblical literalist -- the Biblical text does not actually fit the geography of Tall el-Hammam. But more problematically, there is a chronology fail. Eugene Merrill (Biblical Literalist) states that for Tall El-Hammam to be Sodom one must deny all of the Biblical Dates before the time of the judges. Even Christian excavators say the site of Tall El-Hammam shows signs of continuous occupation going back 2500 years before the date of its destruction... but... there was a flood that killed all but 8 human beings just 11 generations before that. People were flourishing here at least a couple of hundred years before Young Earth creationists claim the Earth was created. ALl kinds of problems for a literal interpretation of the Bible here.
7:35 is the kicker for me. "A scene of utmost devastation." There are, apparently, no volcanoes in the area, and I highly doubt no army in those days could work fire so efficiently to produce the total destruction described here.
A few "tiny" issues. Supposedly, Sodom was destroyed just 11 generations after the Biblical Flood killed all but 8 people on Earth. To get even 500,000 on Earth by this time would have required population expansion 1000 percent faster than the speed of what archaeologists believe was possible at this time! But strangely, there are over 500,000 a bodies at Bab Ed-Dhra from this period alone already. Tall El-Hammam may have been destroyed by a meteor like the one in Siberia recently, but people who have no clue about the science of such events were likely to make up a supernatural tale to explain its occurrence. There is a geography fail according to Bill Shlegel -- Biblical literalist -- the Biblical text does not actually fit the geography of Tall el-Hammam. But more problematically, there is a chronology fail. Eugene Merrill (Biblical Literalist) states that for Tall El-Hammam to be Sodom one must deny all of the Biblical Dates before the time of the judges. Even Christian excavators say the site of Tall El-Hammam shows signs of continuous occupation going back 2500 years before the date of its destruction... but... there was a flood that killed all but 8 human beings just 11 generations before that. People were flourishing here at least a couple of hundred years before Young Earth creationists claim the Earth was created. ALl kinds of problems for a literal interpretation of the Bible here.
The sulfur rocks found at the site contain such a high concentration of sulfur, to this day (that is, after burning down 8 miles of territory) that it is still over 90%, far higher than anywhere else on earth. The composition of some of the rocks is apparently so bizarre, from what I’ve read, that it cannot be chemically replicated in a lab. You can still pick them up and light them and they burn intensely
Certainly appears too coincidental. A far stronger case than others I've seen. Assuming all your information is accurate, you would probably have to be biased to avoid concluding that it is the site of Sodom and Gomorah.
It’s not about being biased he’s clearly showing where Solomon could possibly be in the evidence fits with the time and The location in the description in genesis. We can never know for certain but it’s a very accurate description and it sounds the most plausible that’s not biased that’s just following the evidence
i could have sworn there was a documentary sometime ago about this subject. where was a massive volcano explosion somewhere near the dead sea or maybe im misremembering
There's show produced by James Cameron and the Jewish filmmaker from Canada. Their theory hinged on a massive volcano blowout in the Mediterranean Sea which set off a chain of events in Egypt resulting in the Exodus. The Dead Sea is part of a big rift that runs way down into Africa but no active volcanic activity from it in the ME.
@@alexwr So you believe men’s word over archeological evidence and proof... okay then. And we wonder why so many people don’t even believe Jesus existed anymore. People literally have no brain anymore.
@Jim Hibbits have you taken statistics, or are you just repeating something cool you've heard from other cool people of which you associate? You are dismissing the placebo effect. Statistics is science. Or, in psychology, things such as Baader-Meinhof phenomenon exist. See, even if I weren't a believer, I'd be careful not to lump "everything" into "nothing" without seeking all scientific data first. Because now, psychologically you'll KNOW people are praying for you. How will your mind interpret this? Good day, sir. We'll be praying.
@Jim Hibbits yes, sir! It sure was. lol This, economics and geology {carbon dating equations}. In a lot of religion, people want to categorize events as happening solely by the hand of the creator. However, meteors or earthquakes or other natural disasters were found to be the culprits in a lot of the biblical cataclysms. Some argue the biblical aged minds were unable to explain natural disasters, so they "made up" the existence of gods or God to give reason or purpose behind these events, as humans are inherently superstitious and fearful of the unknown. So, I'll take a different approach. Outliers. Science can explain so much of our creation. But what doesn't fit within the paradigms of history or rules of nature, we lump into categories such as force majeure or call them outliers. Though they may not be as plentiful, they must still be calculated as part of the whole equation. I also see people forgetting the basic definition of science and it's methods, which define what MUST occur to make a true statement. Rather than berate anyone for their beliefs in God, I ask that you remember the outliers. They aren't wrong. They just don't fit within the value range to calculate averages, statistically speaking.
Ok, so a meteor, "it could only be a meteor " so smug. How do you explain the almost surgical precision of not just sod. and gom. But several other cities as well.areas around these places were not scorched . This was Intelligent design and delivery. Meteors are not so precise. GOD IS GREAT.
If god is that great, why killing all the children in sodom as well? Not my kind of god… i do not see how todlers of 4y old deserve such ‘punishment’ Btw, there is another item that can cause such devastation: a nuclear blast.
@@pascalsierens6299 I can't wait to tell you about how the adults in Sodom sacrificed their children to the false god Molech by contracting a metal statue and heating it up in fire and then sizzled their children to death like a fried egg while beating drums and whatnot to mask the babies screams. By in the bible it says Cain killing Abel is what gave Abel eternal love and actually killed Cain. So technically by gods standards all those children got eternal life for free so you're point of view is bias
I read in a 17th century text describing the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, that mortar for the stones was “ A single, black, and gluteyn mortar from the plains of Asphaltida, wherein stood the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah.
A few "tiny" issues. Supposedly, Sodom was destroyed just 11 generations after the Biblical Flood killed all but 8 people on Earth. To get even 500,000 on Earth by this time would have required population expansion 1000 percent faster than the speed of what archaeologists believe was possible at this time! But strangely, there are over 500,000 a bodies at Bab Ed-Dhra from this period alone already. Tall El-Hammam may have been destroyed by a meteor like the one in Siberia recently, but people who have no clue about the science of such events were likely to make up a supernatural tale to explain its occurrence. There is a geography fail according to Bill Shlegel -- Biblical literalist -- the Biblical text does not actually fit the geography of Tall el-Hammam. But more problematically, there is a chronology fail. Eugene Merrill (Biblical Literalist) states that for Tall El-Hammam to be Sodom one must deny all of the Biblical Dates before the time of the judges. Even Christian excavators say the site of Tall El-Hammam shows signs of continuous occupation going back 2500 years before the date of its destruction... but... there was a flood that killed all but 8 human beings just 11 generations before that. People were flourishing here at least a couple of hundred years before Young Earth creationists claim the Earth was created. ALl kinds of problems for a literal interpretation of the Bible here.
The smoke of the conflagration went up like the smoke of a great furnace. And the fair vale of Siddim became a desolation, a place never to be built up or inhabited-a witness to all generations of the certainty of God's judgments upon transgression. PP 162.2
I suggested to the Adventists that extracting deep core samples on the shores of the Dead Sea might produce evidence of S & G. Surely a couple of years later they reported finding green glass in core sample, evidence of the extreme heat as in this article. Unfortunately I do not know where these were found. (1970 approximately)
I encourage everyone on this comment section to literally take this video with a grain of salt (pun intended), Take a look at this: th-cam.com/video/7uq5LISB6zM/w-d-xo.html
This is the part of preaching the gospel to show the truth of the Bible. Matthew 24:14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.
It says in the last days knowledge shall increase. Well, when stories of the Bible are being scientifically proven I'd say that's another "fairy tale" being rendered fact yet again.
@Andrew Harper it all comes down to what you wish to place your faith in. Man or God. The fish can search the bowl day and night for their entire lives and it will never get them any closer to understanding the ways of the one who provides for them.
@Andrew Harper referring to your flat earth comment, Isaiah 40:22, referring to God, states, “He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers." This tells me you dont know a whole lot about the Holy Bible other than what other people seeking to mislead you have told you.
@Andrew Harper IDK man, accurately predicting the destruction of Sodom and Gommorah with the corret time period, correct method of destruction and location does give it pretty good evidence considering the fact that these "fabricators" were supposed shepards who couldnt write...
Another great book by Collins is "Harvest Heartland of Bible Lands" which has all the details. He also he has a great take on the Pharaoh of the Exodus in his book "Let my People Go." If you haven't done so, please have him on.
Your absolutely awesome, superb research and excellent explanation techniques methods you practice helps it all come together so evidentual in chronicle order I thank you for taking the time to share your knowledge with others such as myself and you and your family remain blessed.
This is not a high standard of scholarship, however, it is conceivable that this particular site was also destroyed at the same time that those five cities of the plain west of the Jordan were destroyed
I think it is quite strange that we have proofs of God's existence and credibility of the bible and Christianity in general and yet the world still doesn't believe. God help us all in Jesus name. I believe in the death and resurrection of Christ Jesus.
Since making this video experts on meteoritic air bursts have begun to question if the site was was destroyed by one. If further research reveals the site was not destroyed by an air burst this video will be removed: retractionwatch.com/2021/10/01/criticism-engulfs-paper-claiming-an-asteroid-destroyed-biblical-sodom-and-gomorrah/
There’s no such thing as meteors as we know them
@@roerich1848 Who is Dr Falk? And what evidence does he offer to make that conclusion?
Collins has been doing archeology for decades and has the only certified college of biblical archeology in the US.
The evidence that Tall el Hammam is Sodom is overwhelming and is being accepted by the archeological community as more and more evidence is found.
It is in the right place, north of the Dead Sea on the plain of the Jordan. Exactly where the bible cleary says it should be.
Tehep is also in the right time.
And Tehep also has exactly what one would expect to find after the destruction of Sodom.
Right place,
Right time, and
Right stuff.
And there is no other site that fits the biblical narrative of Sodom.
@@nahshon9998 _”Collins is a certified archeologist”_ at time stamp of the video 7:57, he says the temperature exceeds 6,000 degrees Celsius…… Do you even know what that means? It is literally one of the most scientifically illiterate things I’ve ever heard, THE SURFACE OF THE SUN is 5,500 degrees Celsius, at HALF that temperature, the city as well as the region would melt into a puddle…. This alone should suffice enough that your “certified archeologist” wouldn’t be able to tell his reflection in the mirror, let alone be certified for anything.
Plus, you saying Collins is the ONLY one who is “certified” for the field of biblical archeology just goes to show how the majority of others believe that what the Bible says and actual archeological findings couldn’t be any more different and rarely correlate, for example, no archeologist or scholar believes that the origin of different languages started because God punished the Babylonians for building the tower of Babel.
@@nahshon9998 of course all you have is empty rhetoric with little substance or sources, examples include the fact that in the video, it was not a physician who made the claim about the outrageous temperature, but Collins himself, as well as the fact that just by simply doing the most bare minimum of research concerning this topic, you would find the majority of sites, both respected and shady, have their doubts about this finding(with the exception of Christian one’s of course), which would indicate that there is no unanimous agreement as you claim as well.
It’s pretty obvious that you only go to biased sources only to reaffirm your own belief’s and promote intellectual dishonesty, saying that every “biblical archeology” has been uncovered is just simply wrong, and I think deep down you know that too, have they found Babel? Do linguists agree that different languages started because God punished Babylon for building Babel? Noah’s ark? I challenge you to find these “findings” in a neutral source and not one that is clearly biased. Speaking of biased, please do research on which University Collins comes from and see their guidelines, a Christian college that refuses to hear any criticism and label those who do as bullies, because of course Christians do love their prosecution complex….
Stop talking like a psychiatrist, just because I have the ability to be critical to buffoonery does not mean that I hate anyone or anything….
@@faisalsukhtian1932 Grow up. Collins isn't a physicist.
Abraham was the smartest man in the Bible. He knew a Lot.
I'll see myself out.
😐😐😭😭😭😭😭
Get out please 😅😅
That made me laugh. I needed a laugh. Thanks. I laughed a Lot.
who was the first electronics expert ?? God. He took a rib from Adam and created a loudspeaker.......
@@veseyvonveitinghof7088 jesus man 😂
I remember when it was stated that The Hittites did not exist, it was later found to be true. Turns out the Bible is not just a fairytale.
True, also, for those who say the Bible is a fairytale, how many fairy tales have tablets as proof of their events, scrolls (most famously the Dead Sea scrolls), what about prophecies? Not to mention historians like Celsus, Mara Bara Serpion, Talmud, Cornelius Tacitus, and many more 👀.
@@ShalemAhava Pliny the Younger, Julius Africanus, Thallus (who Julius Africanus quotes), Josephus and ofcourse all the successors of the Apostles (The Church Fathers)
True, as long as one doesn't make the mistake of taking everything as direct fact like the table of nations.
@@ShalemAhava The existence of real events does not prove the supernatural elements or the theological message, a story can be placed in and based on real events without being true.
Lets say that Sodom and Gomorrah really were destroyed by a firey explosion from space, so what? It gives us no evidence towards whether this was really from God, whether the characters in the story and the specifics of their actions ever happened.
The idea that people were taking real events and ascribing supernatural meaning and making theological claims using these as the backdrop is really not a particularly far-fetched one.
@@youngyvidz716 Well I think you might have a wrong interpretation what he is trying to show it was by Genesis so far is recording history we may never know if someone of these people existed like Abraham,But the evidence he does show so far shows a pretty good documentation of ancient history End it shows a Hebrews kept a good amount of ancient history no one can truly know if the theology is true or not but at least we know that some of these things could’ve happened no one can truly know if it ever did released a good evidence that they kept a good record of things. We should really wait till he does the exodus documentary
I am loving how much of the Bible is proving true for everyone to see lately- love it!
🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤬🤦♂️🤬
Not for everyone... just for the gullible non-thinkers.
A few "tiny" issues. Supposedly, Sodom was destroyed just 11 generations after the Biblical Flood killed all but 8 people on Earth. To get even 500,000 on Earth by this time would have required population expansion 1000 percent faster than the speed of what archaeologists believe was possible at this time! But strangely, there are over 500,000 a bodies at Bab Ed-Dhra from this period alone already. Tall El-Hammam may have been destroyed by a meteor like the one in Siberia recently, but people who have no clue about the science of such events were likely to make up a supernatural tale to explain its occurrence. There is a geography fail according to Bill Shlegel -- Biblical literalist -- the Biblical text does not actually fit the geography of Tall el-Hammam. But more problematically, there is a chronology fail. Eugene Merrill (Biblical Literalist) states that for Tall El-Hammam to be Sodom one must deny all of the Biblical Dates before the time of the judges. Even Christian excavators say the site of Tall El-Hammam shows signs of continuous occupation going back 2500 years before the date of its destruction... but... there was a flood that killed all but 8 human beings just 11 generations before that. People were flourishing here at least a couple of hundred years before Young Earth creationists claim the Earth was created. ALl kinds of problems for a literal interpretation of the Bible here.
@@TMPreRaff oh come on, how else do you explain this evidence?
@@Elijah-Bravo he can’t, he’s a typical edgy atheist
We found it years ago, it’s called Las Vegas.
More like tel Aviv.
*founded
lol
@@NickNuiGames rapist and angelphile aren’t the exact words that come to mind
I thought it was San Francisco
I was in Isreal in 2016-2018. I wanted to go to this sight, but never got the chance. There is so much to see. I'll return someday, God willing.
@lol lol Nah, the Biblical account is extremely accurate pertaining to human history, then on top of this the phrophecies that were fulfilled. Look at the book of isaiah predicting the coming of Jesus, we know now it was written before his birth thanks to the dead sea scrolls. Then look at the genetic evidence. We all descend from TWO people , the Thaler & Stoekle study found this out. Then we found out we all descend from three mtDNA lineages (Noahs 3 sons). The Bible has never been scientifically contradicted. I mean this goes much deepee but the Bible is very accurate.
You were in Israel for two years but didn't learn how to spell Israel? Sounds legit.
Watch amazing hidden messages of Genesis 19 vs 8
th-cam.com/video/GW6vikzvcKs/w-d-xo.html Part 1
th-cam.com/video/mTLpZlUgADU/w-d-xo.html Part 2.
U were in Palestine that is illegally called Israel Free Free Palestine
@@longliveindia837 hell nah. Palestine dors Not exist
Discovering sodom is by far my favorite book of biblical archeology, it reads so well, takes you to the sites and follows the discovery process mentally.. so worth your time. Also I had no idea what a headache it is to find human remains anywhere in a potentially Muslim country, it gives you a deeper appreciation for those scholars that weild the shovels.
In the year 2024 BC, two Angeles appeared to Abraham at the door of his encampment and told him to leave because they were sent to destroy the wicked cities of the plains.
All Bible students and church goers know the story of Lot and his wife wife and family being given time to get away into the hills and told not to look back.
Lot's wife was not turned in to a pillar of salt. She was disintegrated by the nuclear blast.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not the first cities destroyed by nuclear weapons, Sodom and Gomorrah and other cities of that region were.
Check out the Sumerian cuneiform writings, which tell the same story and are older than the Torah and the rest of the Biblical writings.
@@geraldv.greening5719 the assumption that a story is older is based on the presumption that any dialectic content of an older dated manuscript or tablet precedes one allegedly younger. This is not necessarily the case. All counterfeit are an homage to the authentic.
Watch amazing hidden messages of Genesis 19 vs 8
th-cam.com/video/GW6vikzvcKs/w-d-xo.html Part 1
th-cam.com/video/mTLpZlUgADU/w-d-xo.html Part 2.
"Discovering Sodom" was written by Steven Collins and Latayne Scott. That book refutes what this site claims.
Collins' site is on the plain of the Jordan river, north of the Dead Sea.
This video is claiming that Sodom is at the south end of the Dead Sea.
This site is incorrect. Read Genesis 13:8-11. It clearly says that Sodom is East of Bethel and Ai. That puts Sodom on thh plain of the Jordan, north of the Dead Sea.
It is written in the Bible, It is true .
The idea of Lots wife getting turned into a pillar of salt always brought to mind a 'natural' event for me anyway. I think of the remains at Pompeii. Being coated with minerals in a blast.
@@11kravitzn The exact phrase in Hebrew "looked back" is only used 1 other place, 2 Chr. 13:14. To describe a battle behind someone. Not really enough to tell us her physical orientation to her husband and others. It apparently placed her at a more vulnerable vantage point.
@@11kravitzn Yeah H5027 is "looked," but not the whole phrase, which is what I was searching. Regardless, is this different from what you think?
@@11kravitzn I also think it was miraculous. Just perhaps in a more Providential way, because of the method of destruction being so similar to some very rare natural occurrences. Another example would be God using a strong wind to part the Red Sea.
@@Jim-Mc Hey Jim is this pretty of topic but in June I’m soon going to debate a Muslim on the crucifiction and I wondered if you could help find scholar or sources Wich says that Jesus was crucified.
Plus how do I respond to a Muslim when he says that Jesus was not crucified but instead Judas was 🤔
I've head that the phrase turned into a pillar of salt is actually a idiom for dying of fear, because the person turns white like salt. It's theorised that when she looked back the sight of what was happening caused such fear that she died instantly. It's an interesting perspective.
I am not surprised that people don't believe this discovery despite the Bible describing the locations. The devil was always going to do everything possible to discredit it. Even the Bible warns of the devices of the devil. May God have mercy.
I wouldn't want to say more because due experience of being insulted and disrespected when sharing thoughts and opinions about Bible archeological discoveries by people towards other people. God bless.🙏🏽
Wow! Yet another example of history in the Bible. And people say it’s all fairytales. Thanks for another good video IP!
People claim to find this place every 5 years or so and it aways a different place.
Bible is man made written for control and power over people
@@randyg.7940 Do you actually study the archeology surrounding the biblical places or are you just making statements based on what you think?
@@randyg.7940 That doesn't logically follow to, "none of them are the real place," though. What is does logically follow to is, "We need to look at the evidence to find out if any of the sites are the real Sodom and Gomorrah"
Fairytales? No.
Myths? Most likely.
The ancient Jews were likely describing incredible situations orally for thousands of years before they were actually written down. With that many centuries of playing telephone, it was more than likely they’d write down some pretty crazy stuff.
The end of the ice age suddenly becomes Noah’s flood, an earthquake taking down the Ziggurat of Eridu becomes God smiting down the Tower of Babel, and the flooding of a popular settling area where the Red Sea is today, becomes the banishment from Eden.
These people were describing situations in the only way they truly knew how. With legends, gods, spirits, and myths.
This doesn’t mean, suddenly, that God is real.
@@randyg.7940 If the Bible was made to control people I'd rather listen to what it said than anything else. I mean, the media today won't tell me monogamy is good, lower pleasures are evil, and I can live a lifetime of happiness
In 2007, when I was helping with the ESV Study Bible maps and charts, our cartography and other experts on staff also agreed with your location, though in the end, I put a (?) mark next to it since our work was still very close to the excavations of el-Hammam and the results were not published or clear yet. But it's looking pretty solid at this point, over 10 years later. Thank you for your work on this.
Thank you! What did your work involve on the ESV study Bible?
@@InspiringPhilosophy I have done a great deal of work with several study Bibles. On this one, I was part of the initial team that developed the scope and features and details of the project, then went on to work with the cartographer, scholars, and artists in helping get maps and charts and objects rendered properly. Part of my spade work was doing all the annotations that accompanies maps, charts, and objects. I also did the initial rendering of most of the objects and 3d maps.
It was a real challenge and a lot of fun.
@lol lol so an event is fabricated because it doesn't agree with what the all knowing person that you are thinks is possible
@lol lol the OP said he was part of a research project... I doubt you know more than he does
@lol lol Your criticism is juvenile at best, proven by your language. .Do you actually believe that those involved in such projects not once considered such?
I always love how "experts" try to debunk the Bible and always fail
@Odhe Precious Could you link us references to your claims? Or you are just talking out of your ass.
@Odhe Precious actually it isn't check Inspiringphilosophy video on evidence for Noah's flood
@Odhe Precious yes it true Earth is not 6000 year old and can you give me any bible verse that's says it is and Adam and Eve are allegorical have you ever heard of theistic evolution? Lol
@huberkrypto When did the bible say it was "6000 years ago"? Or that it was even 6 days old? How do we know what days mean? The beggining of Genesis was just a story talking about how God created the universe. There is many evidence that the flood happenned in multiple places. It might not have been as global as the bible says. But there was still a massive flood. Locally or Globally. You guys only cling on to the "debunking" of Adam and Eve and the Flood when you are reading and studying it all wrong.
@@INFINITUMSPIRIT Archaeology is a double-edged sword. If it can prove the Bible, it can also disprove it, and once Christians have brought it up in support of their doctrines, they cannot then discard it as soon as its conclusions become inconvenient to them. And in recent decades, as more evidence emerges, it has turned increasingly against them. A more complete picture of the history of ancient Israel has surfaced, one that brings out in sharp relief which parts of the Old Testament are historical and which parts are not.
The Exodus may represent a distorted folk memory of Egypt and the Hyksos. Sometime between 2000 and 1500 BC, the possibly Semitic people called Hyksos “invaded” Egypt. It was more like a mass immigration than a military conquest, but they managed to wind up running the place somehow, until the Egyptians rose up and forcibly expelled the Hyksos.
The Judeans of the 640-609 BC time frame, aka the Josianic Era (ie when King Josiah reigned) had a dim memory of this, and had a love-hate relationship with Egypt, which was alternately an ally and enemy of Judah. Many Judeans emigrated to Egypt to look for work, much as the Hyksos had 1000 years earlier.
The Judean priests then made up a story by combining the ancient fact of the Hyksos with the modern politics of Judah. It introduced Joseph and his brothers, and basically said that the ancestors of the Judeans were the Hyksos who had lived in Egypt. During the reign of Josiah, who attempted to conquer the land north of Judah, which was formerly the kingdom of Israel, the priests came up with the idea that Israel and Judah had once been a united kingdom, with Judah’s own heroes David and Solomon ruling the place from Jerusalem. They attributed several lavish cities and monuments in Israel and Judah to these two, but in reality these monuments were built in Israel about 100 years after the time of Solomon, and they were built by King Omri’s family.
During the Babylonian Exile, the captive priests added a new wrinkle to the Egypt story. The Hebrews had been slaves in Egypt until they revolted with divine assistance, and made a great Exodus to the Promised Land of Canaan, which became the lands of Israel and Judah.
The problem is, the Exodus can only have happened in the window of 1500-1200 BC, and throughout that time Canaan was an Egyptian province, full of Egyptian peacekeeping troops. The slaves would have only been running from one Egypt to another. What happened is, the priests writing the story treated Egypt with the geography it had during the Josianic Era. This is reflected in the Joseph story, where the Egyptian vizier accuses the Israelite immigrants of being spies from the east, whereas at the time they would have been from a land which Egypt already owned. All the Egyptian cities mentioned in Genesis and Exodus existed in the Josianic Era, but most of them were founded after the latest possible date for the Exodus. It would be as if someone wrote a story where King James sent John Smith to America, and Smith checked in at the ports of Boston, New York, and Washington.
The reference in Exodus that Hebrew slaves built the city of Ramesses has created the impression (popularised by Hollywood, so let it be written, so let it be done) that Ramses II was the Pharaoh of the Exodus, or perhaps the Pharaoh of the Oppression. We know that his son Merneptah wrote a letter in 1207 BC telling how he had defeated Israel among a list of Canaanites, so the Exodus must be before then if it really happened. The Exodus pointedly refuses to name the Pharaohs in its story, presumably because the writers didn’t know the names of any Pharaohs in the relevant time period.
Jericho and other Canaanite cities did not have walls at the time, as they were in a fairly peaceful Egyptian province. The great ruins of Canaanite cities were not made all at one time, but are from numerous invasions in different centuries. Some were destroyed by Greek pirates, not Joshua’s Israelites.
Abraham’s story is similarly full of anachronisms, like referring to the province of Dan and the presence of Philistines.
👏🏽 👏🏽👏🏽
Enjoying this Genius series, brotha.
Thanks!
Soo cool genocide lol
@@nunomartins2209 destruction of the wicked*
@@nunomartins2209 No. it’s called God’s justice. And we thank him for punishing the wicked and lawlessness of men.
@King King
Genocide is the systematic harm and killing of a specific ethnic, national, social, religious group for such specifics. The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah does not fit that criteria. It was capital punishment for people who consistently performed vile actions. They were egotistical, greedy, unwilling to help others, and rapists.
The Bible is big book and has thousands of stories, if a random story like this can be proved or even can correlate with scientific findings like this this well then at least there must be some truth to it testimony and I believe we should look at it as more than just a religious book. I am compelled to believe.
Many atheists and agnostic historians have stated that stories in the bible align with historical events and many sources outside the bible supporting it.
True
Not true lol the tower of bable was a lie etc
@Anti-commie Spray What makes someone a Militant atheist?
@Anti-commie Spray When you say they are not leading by example, what should they be leading by example?
It's eerie how much actual historical evidence there is even for the stories accounted to the old testament. An Old Book, but a goodie, I read on the subject matter was called "The Bible as History" the advances in biblical archealogy from those times to now... even so the book records an incredible detail of all sorts of historical facts, whether divine in nature or no, the Bible is almost a first hand account of Bronze Age Hebrews! Followed up by Early Christianity... it's an astonishing thing.
Apparently you haven't really studied history and religious texts. There is no such thing as a god, of any religion. Religions were created for manipulation and control. The stars were the heavens and anything mystical was from 'god'. There are scientific evidences of things happening from these religious texts. What kind of person would worship a god that allows all the unnecessary suffering in the world from innocent individuals (esp. children)?? I would never worship any god like that. Any religious text is just a fictiona writing with some realistic references so that it's believeable. No different than what's out there now.
@@the2ndQT apparently, you haven’t studied much of anything at all
@@kennylee6499 your opinion to think so. I'm not hurt. Dont worry. I know what I know and I dont need some man made cult to tell me it
@@the2ndQT you're just randomly spitting out words now do you even know what you're saying?
@@the2ndQT If there was truly no meaning behind the universe, then we should have never found out that there was no meaning. Just like if there was no light in the universe, we would have never knew what is dark. The word "dark" would be completely meaningless.
I believe in faith what the Bible says. But, I'm always excited by evidence that exposes the biblical accounts as TRUE!! As always, you did an excellent job introducing and breaking down the technical points. Thank you!! I look forward to what's next 💯!!
So you believe in your god committing genocide advocating murder stoning of children misogyny incest and slavery to name a few. Your faith is misguided.
Amen 🙏.
And what u think hell is
@@matthewstotler8911 hell was made up by religion to scare people into submission.
@@borisbash Do you even have 2 brain cells? God destroyed a city that was so famous for a word that was named after them. Sodomy. because they would sodomize everyone. i think their punishment was well deserved. or are you one of those people that believes serial killers and rapists deserve to be treated with kindness?
@@optimumpcyt you attempt to insult me I replied but yet you say nothing. Gutless
“Several cities on a plain” Alright, definitely time to go to sleep. My genius brain immediately thought, “haha flying cities go burrrrrn”. Yikes.
That city went down fast I bet.
Same 😂😂😂
Oh no 🤣🤣
Best comment ever
What flying cities? The Bible never mentions Sodom or Gemora flying.
You Found it????? It has always been here. It's called Las Vegas.
You forgot to mention the balls of brimstone, made out of 95+% sulfer, that were found scattered around the area!
also this is pure sulphur
That are in much, much higher concentration than anywhere else on Earth. Some scientists tried to dismiss the sulfur balls as possibly being from space, which is kinda accurate considering it did rain brimstone that day.
@Daniel Velazquez
I think this is a different area. Not the same site.
@@brando3342 I thought it was nuclear glass they found around Sodom.
@@jamesbaxter5147 That's because they don't want it to be true, it goes against their narrative.
Satan flings insults.
YHWH flings meteors.
Dope.
No, it wasn't meteors. It was "fire and brimstone".
@@statutesofthelord a meteor exploding above the ground sending a large shockwave, with fire and rocks coming down, would be like “fire and brimstone.”
@@statutesofthelord also there was sulphur and things like that found there
@@statutesofthelord and brimstone was also found in the area.
Thanks for that - “Blessed are those who have not seen, and have believed.” - Still it sure is nice when the evidence jumps into place, matching that faith ☺️
@Andrew Harper thanks for your comment Andrew. I understand the basics of many of these and see no contradiction within God’s incredible design. I have alsoseen as much pointing out the flaws in the evolution theory as I have the reverse. Even Darwin noted such. But I don’t have the skills to change your mind so I will pray that you come to faith in your time. God loves you and wants you to know Him. Take care and thanks again. 😊
@Fred Smith theories that are established science now are not necessarily truth. A flat world used to be established science. The sun revolving around the world used to be established science. I am content that established science is wrong and the bible is right. Again though, I respect you see things differently at the moment and though I pray you change your mind, you have the freedom to choose to believe whatever you wish to believe.
@Fred Smith Thanks for taking the time to answer so extensively. There are obviously claims and counter claims as there is in anything that is so hotly debated. however, what is at the heart of the Christian faith, is just that. Faith. Faith in a loving true God and faith that no matter what we have done, forgiveness is there, freely offered to those who want it through Jesus. I won't persuade you of this, but I do hope that in time God does. Take care and thanks.
Last time I was this early, Sodom was still standing...
pilosopo mga loko
This nation is turning to sodom
😂
And the lord shall judge this nation and the world for all of its sins.
Watch amazing hidden messages of Genesis 19 vs 8
th-cam.com/video/GW6vikzvcKs/w-d-xo.html Part 1.
th-cam.com/video/mTLpZlUgADU/w-d-xo.html Part 2.
👏👏👏Another great archeology video, IP; I like how you seem to be focusing on Genesis, which many secular historians would like to say contradicts history. God bless!
They go predominantly after Genesis because they know it’s the foundation the rest of the bible is built on. In other words by trying to knock down the foundation the rest of the book collapses. Unfortunately for them archeological, prophecy and manuscript evidence keeps going against them lol.
This video tries to disprove Genesis. Actually, God says he sent fire and brimstone on these cities, not some meteor. Check out Ron Wyatt's videos for the true locations of Sodom and Gomorrah.
@@statutesofthelord Did you even watch the video? All meteors contain high amounts of brimstone (sulfur) and the airburst of the meteor would have caused extremely devastating fires. IP does NOT try and disprove genesis.
@@user-ps7ij6ge6d Genesis 19:24 Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven;
But this video says otherwise.
Is God in error, or is this video in error?
@@statutesofthelord Neither are in error. A meteor could have been one of the ways he rained fire and brimstone down.
I'm very much interested in Biblical archæology and my mind wandered away from the sermon the other day, and I started wondering if any such evidence had been found. This is SO fascinating and awesome!!
I am with you Mary K. This does help confirm what we learned in Sunday school 50+ years ago isn't just fantasy.
Look at the place that Ron Wyatt found. It's far more convincing. The sulfer hail stones are still there. Thousands of them
There is evidence, like the walls of Jericho, never happened, the Bible is not historical. Religion is in your mind, there’s very little proof. These very intelligent people which wrote these stories has very little knowledge of the facts, the population was 95% illiterate. The Rabbis didn’t want the truth as in Christianity the leaders of the Church. They wanted control.
Yes, back at it again with another IP video!
Watch amazing hidden messages of Genesis 19 vs 8
th-cam.com/video/GW6vikzvcKs/w-d-xo.html Part 1.
th-cam.com/video/mTLpZlUgADU/w-d-xo.html Part 2.
One thing I learned in college was that our definitions of the cardinal directions were different to the ancient Hebrews. They viewed it to the side, where north and south were east and west, respectively. Not sure how well this fits in, because in that case Sodom would've been north. I think this explanation fits much better, but I never was able to confirm or deny that about directions in the ancient Levant
Watch amazing hidden messages of Genesis 19 vs 8
th-cam.com/video/GW6vikzvcKs/w-d-xo.html Part 1
th-cam.com/video/mTLpZlUgADU/w-d-xo.html Part 2.
The bible may be just a boring book to many, but to us, it's our history, our real history, the word of God is real, Jesus really did exist, and still does, all the proof of the Bible is so ancient its either buried in the sands or withered away, but it's There! Still there, and it's real! No matter how many deny it.
Sheeeeesh you’re proving biblical events left and right.
Are you ever going to talk about the documentary hypothesis? It seems like an interesting topic.
Yes
@@InspiringPhilosophy AYYYY
What is documentary hypotesis?
@@postmodpen1169 There’s a ton of variations of it, but the most basic view is that the Five Books of Moses (Pentateuch) were compiled from at least four different sources: the J source Jahwist, the E or Elohist source, the D for Deuteronomist, and P for the priestly source. They contend that all of these basic sources were at one point separate sources that were compiled together sometime around the Babylonian exile. It goes by other names such as the JEDP theory or the Graf/Wellhausen Theory. Julius Wellhausen is considered the father of the documentary hypothesis. The theory really blew up because of his work in the latter half of the 19th century.
@@thegoofypaladin715
still, it's just simply a hypothesis
till now, it's never proven to be true
a hypothesis will never be considered true or fact
again, it's still a hypothesis
Once again.. your vidoes are amazing ,extremly educational and intresting
Watch amazing hidden messages of Genesis 19 vs 8
th-cam.com/video/GW6vikzvcKs/w-d-xo.html Part 1.
th-cam.com/video/mTLpZlUgADU/w-d-xo.html Part 2.
The real question is, why do archeologists all wear vests and khakis, while the local hires on the crew are in jeans and t-shirts?
You really are out here asking the real questions Lol
@@possiblyblessing_man3745 doing my part brother
Because all the archeologists watched Indiana Jones
The ones wearing jeans are descendents of the Levites, the tribe of Levi.
To be cool of course!
Wow, I just discovered you... instant sub. Thanks!
Not a theist, but I am a historian and im impressed with the argument here, well done!
This theory may easily be confirmed through independent geological tests.
This is not to say, however, that the israelite account is accurate. A meteor hitting a city in nearly any culture would be interpreted as the will of a god or devil of some sort. Theology is often used to explain unusual natural phenomena and evidence that could differentiate the natural from the supernatural would be necessary to substantiate religious claims
Become a theist homie God is real Jesus died for you was buried and raised from the dead for you God bless you and your people God love you
@@jesusislordoflords876 I'm deconverted, but I admire your passionate response!
That’s fair. I don’t think we can prove the Bible with archaeology, it only helps support the account.
@@InspiringPhilosophy I don't know. Between you and a few other sources, I've seen more than enough to demonstrate that the Bible is historically reliable. Under those circumstances, archeology might do more to prove the Bible than you think. In either case, it's certainly a great tool to be used toward that end. I've watched your videos off and on for the last few years, and am always impressed with the amount of leg work you put into each one. You work has actually formed the basis for more than one of my apologetic arguments, so keep up the good work, sir.
@@InspiringPhilosophy We can't "prove" _any_ historical account, Biblical or not, with the kind of certainty afforded by the empiral sciences, logic and math. However, it is frustrating to see how often many skeptics go about an archaeological double standard; if they don't think the evidence here and in other places is good enough, why not just trash the whole of recorded history already?
Let those who want to live ungodly take heed,
Responding to the issues raised by @YoungyVidz below:
"The existence of real events does not prove the supernatural elements or the theological message" -- But is this proof that the 'supernatural' aspect of the story is false? I expect you would say, 'no, not necessarily.' We agree then.
"The fact that it (possibly) is an accurate account of natural phenomena in no way validates its supernatural claims" -- But is this state of affairs proof that the 'supernatural' claim is false? Again, i expect your response is 'no, not necessarily.' We again agree.
"The supernatural claim will always be less likely than a naturalistic claim" - Or are you really saying this, 'no supernatural claim is ever true, ergo, all supernatural claims are false--including the story of God's judgment on Sodom'. Is this REALLY what you're saying if you're being forthright about it?
Let's take a closer look:
1. The Bible talks about the ancient cities of Sodom and Gomorrah - Say, this is more true than not.
2. The Bible gives accurate locations where the cities are located - Say, this is more true than not.
3. The Bible says that both cities were destroyed by a cataclysmic event - Data suggests more true than not.
4. The biblical narrative says that it's due to the judgment of God.
Now, say 1, 2, and 3 are more true than not (more or less accurate/consistent with the facts/available data). What do we do with #4? This is where one's a priori worldview commitments play a critical epistemic role.
>A committed naturalist (put here hardcore secularist, atheist, antitheist, et al), even if he fully agrees with 1, 2, and 3, of course would conclude #4 as utterly false, even without any analysis of the argument! Why? Simply because God and the supernatural are utterly outside of his plausibility structure and therefore epistemologically and ontologically unacceptable--ANY explanation is better than God and the supernatural (no matter how highly unlikely that explanation is).
This is a species of 'paradigm dictating on the data/argument', ie., the axiom will simply dismiss any and all ideas outside of its rigid, illegitimate boundary. But this is a fallacy.
A truly intellectually honest position (consistent with the spirit of genuine science, philosophical inquiry, and human curiosity) would be open to where evidence (from other relevant fields of inquiry that will have bearing on the truthfulness, or lack of, of the biblical account) points to--supernatural or not.
I recall a professor, who was a committed naturalist-atheist, once said to his students in class, 'Even if i see a limb grow right before my very eyes--like a complete leg growing in a matter of seconds right in front of me--i will still reject the miraculous. I will always look for a natural explanation.' Well, sure prof. It's a free country.
Its just a burned citty, its not like a thing incredible our impossible.
Specially to a region where warfare happaned in every time and place.
If it was destroyed by meteors we need to find the meteor rock and cratera, thing we dosent found.
"Sky fire" can be some Fire whirl, a completly natural fenomena, the bible is the mounth to mouth account of a pretty superticious people which found divine intervetion or demonic attacks in every thing all this in the time lapse of centuries.
If someone were to be intellectually honest then they wouldn't be able to be Christian, or at least accept the Bible, its filled with utter nonsense forcing believers to have to use apologetics to justify or have believers who are complete idiots like Flat-Earthers or Young Earth Creationists.
You're making a lot of leaps. The point of saying "The presence of X does not prove supernatural intervention" is not an attempt to disprove the claims of supernatural intervention, it is to point out that you are making a substantial jump.
Second of all, saying "Natural explanations are more likely than supernatural events" is not equivalent to saying "supernatural events don't happen". That's a blatant strawman. It's stating that we have demonstrable and verifiable evidence of the natural, and only inferences based on burned down cities and ancient texts for the supernatural. Furthermore, I'm willing to bet that some part of the documentation of the site was misrepresented to a degree, to leave out aspects which contradict. Like the fact that the city has signs of occupation for 2000 years prior, which would merge with Noah's flood. If we're looking at all the evidence, one has to go.
@David Davison No one was killed without a reason, as Genesis 18:26-33 put it:
‘So the Lord said, “If I find in Sodom fifty righteous within the city, then I will spare all the place for their sakes.”
Then Abraham answered and said, “Indeed now, I who am but dust and ashes have taken it upon myself to speak to the Lord: Suppose there were five less than the fifty righteous; would You destroy all of the city for lack of five?”
So He said, “If I find there forty-five, I will not destroy it.”
And he spoke to Him yet again and said, “Suppose there should be forty found there?”
So He said, “I will not do it for the sake of forty.”
Then he said, “Let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak: Suppose thirty should be found there?”
So He said, “I will not do it if I find thirty there.”
And he said, “Indeed now, I have taken it upon myself to speak to the Lord: Suppose twenty should be found there?”
So He said, “I will not destroy it for the sake of twenty.”
Then he said, “Let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak but once more: Suppose ten should be found there?”
And He said, “I will not destroy it for the sake of ten.”
So the Lord went His way as soon as He had finished speaking with Abraham; and Abraham returned to his place.’
Bro your leaps in logic are the real miracle here.
One of my Favorite channels! Yah bless you for your research 🙏🏾💯
Why do you bless someone for trying to disprove the Bible? God says in Genesis 19:24 "Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven;"
Contrary to what this video says, the brimstone has already been found, around 40 years ago, by Ron Wyatt. Look at his videos if you want to know the truth.
Ysa Major Agreed, Love this Channel
@@statutesofthelord Not sure how he's trying to disprove the Bible. Is the location of ancient Sodom and Gomorrah a matter that cannot be debated?
@@MrChristK Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven; Genesis 19:24.
God says He rained brimstone and fire. This video says a meteor did it.
They cannot both be correct.
@@statutesofthelord If a meteor contains sulfur (brimstone) and flaming, melting rocks burning at a very high temperature (fire), then it is the exact same thing. Now let me ask you, who controls nature and can send a meteor to fall on the cities of the plain? The LORD can manipulate nature however He pleases.
Remember, the lord made a promise to not destroy the world again by flood. He did not say by other means.
Watch amazing hidden messages of Genesis 19 vs 8
th-cam.com/video/GW6vikzvcKs/w-d-xo.html Part 1.
th-cam.com/video/mTLpZlUgADU/w-d-xo.html Part 2.
Maybe a little later. Right now, I linked it to Mark 8:19 and so it put me in mind of somebody so I have to go listen.
Yess he did destroy Sodom n gomorrah by fire. Many people speak like Sodom n gomorrah is the world. No, many more destruction may further occur. Including a bigger one at the last to destroy all the world.
May the name of Trinity be higher and more praised. Amen.
Considering Lots wife, I've head that the phrase "turned into a pillar of salt" is actually a idiom for dying of fear, because the person turns white like salt. It's theorised that when she looked back the sight of what was happening it caused such fear that she died instantly. It's an interesting perspective. And provides a naturalistic explanation. Though I don't know if it is true that it is an idiom.
Sure a naturalistic one that means bible still happened.
@@IsraelCountryCube I didn't say that. I was just offering an alternative perspective that has a more naturalistic explanation. That doesn't make it more or less true. If she genuinely tuned into a Piller of salt or if it was a sudden death from fear that wouldn't change the fact the Bible is true.
@@pipinfreshI just think using naturalistic for lots wife is funny when the storyline is Gods supernatural wrath gets poured out
Praise Jesus Christ our Lord.
Nah
Hail satan
Oden! Guide our ships
Our axes, spears and swords
Guide us through storms that whip
And in brutal war!
The Lord rebuke the demons in this reply section. Satan deceives all the nations and deceived you Jason, Revelation 12:9 “So the great dragon was cast out, that serpent of old, called the Devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was cast to the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.”
Glory to the Lord Jesus Christ, only by Him we can be saved! God bless
@@idothisforchristonly7368 Hail Satan 🤘🏻
There are other potential sites besides the two mentioned at the beginning of the video. But we know that at least four cities were destroyed, and we don't know exactly how close together they were. Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, and Zeboiim. It is also likely that a fifth city, Zoar is among the ruins. So even if the site in the video isn't Sodom, we still have at least three or four possibilities, which would all point to the same event. This could be Admah. Or Zeboiim. Whichever, the story in Genesis is proven true!
I want to also briefly point out that "left" and "right" in middle eastern reckoning (and Hebrew is particular) mean "north" and "south." In modern times we are used to thinking of north as "up." But that wasn't always so. Originally, east was up; the direction of the rising of the sun, and also the direction of the spin of the earth. East = forward; West = behind; North = left; South = right.
Your introductions are getting better and better
You forgot to mention the 93% pure brimstone/sulfur they found at the site as well.
Wherever, natural oil deposits are found so is sulphur in its pure form. It is also abundant wherever volcanic activity took place. It's the tenth most abundant element in the universe.
If Wyatt’s sub-Masada site’s destruction can be chronologically correlated with the destruction at the Tel el-Hammam site north of the Dead Sea then it’s possible they BOTH mark the same meteoric event. A high sulfur-content meteor already ablaze and dripping a spray of molten sulfur behind it down onto the ground below could have passed over Wyatt’s site first then continued on the remaining 35 miles northeast as the crow flies to ‘detonate’ over the northern site, where the debris field blast pattern reportedly indicates the meteor indeed approached from the southwest. I’ve speculated myself that the high purity of the sulfur nodules found at Wyatt’s site may be due to the meteor involved in this event having been a chunk of surface material blasted off of Jupiter’s moon Io at some point in the past by a prior meteoric event there. That chunk would have had to escape the Jovian system and found its way eventually to Earth, etc. Tidally stressed/heated by its close orbit around Jupiter, Io has volcanoes erupting various allotropes of sulfur onto its surface at the present time, and those allotropes are apparently what gives Io’s surface its characteristic “diseased piece of fruit” (Carl Sagan’s words) appearance. It would be interesting to see if some future robotic sample-collection mission to Io could verify a match in the purity/chemical profile of the surface sulfur there with that of the sulfur nodules found at Wyatt’s site below Masada. Not likely to happen, but it would be interesting to do such a comparison.
@@ChipsAplentyBand Ron Wyatt was a hack. He had zero training as an archeologist. No post secondary degree. He's been debunked by everyone in the profession as well as every leading biblical scholar. Every claim he has made has been discredited.
@@dominicpardo4783 I hope you'll notice that I made no statement supporting Ron Wyatt's claim to have found Sodom and/or Gomorrah at the site below Masada. I personally think the Tel el-Hammam site northeast of the Dead Sea is a FAR better candidate for their location, both in terms of the biblical text and in terms of the physical evidence laid out in Dr. Collins' book, which I have read. When I referenced the Wyatt site I did so to talk about the presence of the sulfur nodules found there.
My point was that finding that high purity sulfur in that location is ALSO CONSISTENT with a meteoric event in which the meteor approached from the southwest direction, which was Dr. Collins' own proposal for how the cities were destroyed. So my comment was posted in support of Dr. Collins' meteoric event explanation for the destruction of S & G, and was not posted as 'cheerleading' for Mr. Wyatt's choice of site for either/both cities.
A crucial piece of the puzzle that's still missing, so far as I know, is whether the site below Masada and the presence of its sulfur nodules dates to the same time period as the destruction at Tel el-Hammam or not. If you know of information that bears on that question I would be interested to examine it.
@@ChipsAplentyBand The site does NOT show evidence of a singular cataclysmic conflagration. It instead shows evidence of two millennia of continuous habitation. The burials show three distinct styles of internment directly correlated with the social and religious constructs of the time. It is rather the rule than the exception that ancient cities were burned when sacked, and during the period, the region was under siege by several contentious civilizations.
Ron wyatt found the cities of the plains decades ago. He also found the real mount sinai with the alter at the bottom with cows etched all over it. And found noah's ark and the red sea crossing.
He also found bones of the Giants, and Ark of the covenant and was visited few times by angels, and most of the things he did and found (like the golden chariot wheels and the tests of Christs blood and chromosomes) are now lost
No he did not, because he was looking in the wrong place.
@@larrybedouin2921 I was just pointing out sarcastically how obscure he was
Excellent, my thoughts from hearing this story in Sunday School 60 years ago
Watch amazing hidden messages of Genesis 19 vs 8
th-cam.com/video/GW6vikzvcKs/w-d-xo.html Part 1.
th-cam.com/video/mTLpZlUgADU/w-d-xo.html Part 2.
You're telling me you thought of all this apologetics from hearing one Sunday School class years ago?
Fantastic video! Love Dr. Steve Collins and his work at Tall el-Hammam! So glad this site is finally getting more attention.
Also, FYI that Ai is pronounced “eye” and “Kikkar” is pronounced “kik-KAR” 😊
@Jimmy Blacksnake Wyatt was mistaken. This location is almost certainly Sodom. God bless.
Watch amazing hidden messages of Genesis 19 vs 8
th-cam.com/video/GW6vikzvcKs/w-d-xo.html Part 1
th-cam.com/video/mTLpZlUgADU/w-d-xo.html Part 2.
Saw an article saying there was an impact to the northwest and the impact sent a shower of debris over the entire area.
I love the Bible! The more scientists try to disprove it the more they certify it!
This guy is not a scientist by any means... don't let faith blind you to the truth
@@lrcavalli290
We all have faith in something,
scientists say many things that people just take by faith like the history of the earth and even the universe when those scientist's have no greater lifespan than anyone else and their conclusions are just faith on scientists that were before them.
The age of things are partly based and the distance of things in space but that makes some assumptions that the speed of light and the expansion of space has always been the same.
@@danielaplet4036 the speed of light always remains the same... relatively depends on it... unfortunately faith doesn't,and can't equal facts... faith is based on feelings,and that's not in any way, shape,or form,the truth of anything...life as we know it runs on facts,not faith...for example...I go to work to get paid,to pay my bills...those are facts...now I could just stay home and have faith that somehow my bills will get paid, somehow...but that more than likely wouldn't happen... religion is like gambling... you're hoping and have faith that there's a God, even though you've never seen him,or heard him,and you don't actually know if he's there,but you have faith,and hope that he is
Another great video! Looking forward for the Exodus one! 😄
Thank you! In my view, that documentary will be twice as exciting as this one.
I have never run into an individual who is thoughtless to how I am suffering. I have expressed myself in full and yet ignored. It is not I who started it.
They were also discovered in Portland Oregon , Chicago and California
Until I found your channel, I didn't know that Torah apologetics could be so solid!
A few "tiny" issues. Supposedly, Sodom was destroyed just 11 generations after the Biblical Flood killed all but 8 people on Earth. To get even 500,000 on Earth by this time would have required population expansion 1000 percent faster than the speed of what archaeologists believe was possible at this time! But strangely, there are over 500,000 a bodies at Bab Ed-Dhra from this period alone already. Tall El-Hammam may have been destroyed by a meteor like the one in Siberia recently, but people who have no clue about the science of such events were likely to make up a supernatural tale to explain its occurrence. There is a geography fail according to Bill Shlegel -- Biblical literalist -- the Biblical text does not actually fit the geography of Tall el-Hammam. But more problematically, there is a chronology fail. Eugene Merrill (Biblical Literalist) states that for Tall El-Hammam to be Sodom one must deny all of the Biblical Dates before the time of the judges. Even Christian excavators say the site of Tall El-Hammam shows signs of continuous occupation going back 2500 years before the date of its destruction... but... there was a flood that killed all but 8 human beings just 11 generations before that. People were flourishing here at least a couple of hundred years before Young Earth creationists claim the Earth was created. ALl kinds of problems for a literal interpretation of the Bible here.
Watch amazing hidden messages of Genesis 19 vs 8
th-cam.com/video/GW6vikzvcKs/w-d-xo.html Part 1
th-cam.com/video/mTLpZlUgADU/w-d-xo.html Part 2.
7:35 is the kicker for me. "A scene of utmost devastation." There are, apparently, no volcanoes in the area, and I highly doubt no army in those days could work fire so efficiently to produce the total destruction described here.
A few "tiny" issues. Supposedly, Sodom was destroyed just 11 generations after the Biblical Flood killed all but 8 people on Earth. To get even 500,000 on Earth by this time would have required population expansion 1000 percent faster than the speed of what archaeologists believe was possible at this time! But strangely, there are over 500,000 a bodies at Bab Ed-Dhra from this period alone already. Tall El-Hammam may have been destroyed by a meteor like the one in Siberia recently, but people who have no clue about the science of such events were likely to make up a supernatural tale to explain its occurrence. There is a geography fail according to Bill Shlegel -- Biblical literalist -- the Biblical text does not actually fit the geography of Tall el-Hammam. But more problematically, there is a chronology fail. Eugene Merrill (Biblical Literalist) states that for Tall El-Hammam to be Sodom one must deny all of the Biblical Dates before the time of the judges. Even Christian excavators say the site of Tall El-Hammam shows signs of continuous occupation going back 2500 years before the date of its destruction... but... there was a flood that killed all but 8 human beings just 11 generations before that. People were flourishing here at least a couple of hundred years before Young Earth creationists claim the Earth was created. ALl kinds of problems for a literal interpretation of the Bible here.
Watch amazing hidden messages of Genesis 19 vs 8
th-cam.com/video/GW6vikzvcKs/w-d-xo.html Part 1.
th-cam.com/video/mTLpZlUgADU/w-d-xo.html Part 2.
The sulfur rocks found at the site contain such a high concentration of sulfur, to this day (that is, after burning down 8 miles of territory) that it is still over 90%, far higher than anywhere else on earth. The composition of some of the rocks is apparently so bizarre, from what I’ve read, that it cannot be chemically replicated in a lab.
You can still pick them up and light them and they burn intensely
Not just fiery, but explosive destruction
Worse than a “nuclear” explosion
@@Luka23567 Food poisoning?
Certainly appears too coincidental. A far stronger case than others I've seen. Assuming all your information is accurate, you would probably have to be biased to avoid concluding that it is the site of Sodom and Gomorah.
It’s not about being biased he’s clearly showing where Solomon could possibly be in the evidence fits with the time and The location in the description in genesis. We can never know for certain but it’s a very accurate description and it sounds the most plausible that’s not biased that’s just following the evidence
@@webslinger527 I agree, I think you misread me. ;)
@@colmwhateveryoulike3240 you’re right my bad I miss read what u said My apologies thank you for the correction
@@webslinger527 no problem whatsoever. :)
You should not speak of what you do not know.
All thanks, praise, glory, honour and The Kingdom be to Jesus, forever and ever Amen !
Awesome channel, liked and subbed 👍👍👍👍👍
i could have sworn there was a documentary sometime ago about this subject. where was a massive volcano explosion somewhere near the dead sea or maybe im misremembering
I thing your right I might have seen that one so this might be new then not sure though either way this makes since to me.
There's show produced by James Cameron and the Jewish filmmaker from Canada. Their theory hinged on a massive volcano blowout in the Mediterranean Sea which set off a chain of events in Egypt resulting in the Exodus. The Dead Sea is part of a big rift that runs way down into Africa but no active volcanic activity from it in the ME.
So odd you didn't mention the locations that clearly had limestone cooked with sulfur...
I've been there, the ground and soil is totally different in those places. It's ash, like a powder and filled with sulphur spheres
Yes! Almost no one wants to believe the Bible that God rained fire and brimstone on the cities. But Ron Wyatt did, and he found those cities.
@@statutesofthelord You mean the same Ron Wyatt that no Biblical scholars, or archaeologists take seriously?
@@alexwr that’s because he wasn’t in their club. The evidence speaks for itself.
@@alexwr So you believe men’s word over archeological evidence and proof... okay then. And we wonder why so many people don’t even believe Jesus existed anymore. People literally have no brain anymore.
So all and all they don't know where these cities are.
Our "champions" of evidence are already here dismissing this entire presentation as another Christian invention.
It’s not a Christian invention also who is dismissing this presentation
You can bring proof to a person but you can't make them think
@@jerry18291 we’re your Proof saying something doesn’t make it true you have to prove it
@@webslinger527 you have ample evidence here and you still reject it
@@jerry18291 i’m not rejecting anything what exactly am I rejecting
Christ bless you IP from the UK!! You are doing good work brother
Just think, God's going to do it again, only on a global scale. Praise Jesus for providing us a way out of the mess that we've created.
So many people in these comments need prayers🙏🏻
@Jim Hibbits 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻❤️
@Jim Hibbits have you taken statistics, or are you just repeating something cool you've heard from other cool people of which you associate? You are dismissing the placebo effect. Statistics is science. Or, in psychology, things such as Baader-Meinhof phenomenon exist. See, even if I weren't a believer, I'd be careful not to lump "everything" into "nothing" without seeking all scientific data first. Because now, psychologically you'll KNOW people are praying for you. How will your mind interpret this? Good day, sir. We'll be praying.
@Jim Hibbits yes, sir! It sure was. lol This, economics and geology {carbon dating equations}. In a lot of religion, people want to categorize events as happening solely by the hand of the creator. However, meteors or earthquakes or other natural disasters were found to be the culprits in a lot of the biblical cataclysms. Some argue the biblical aged minds were unable to explain natural disasters, so they "made up" the existence of gods or God to give reason or purpose behind these events, as humans are inherently superstitious and fearful of the unknown. So, I'll take a different approach. Outliers. Science can explain so much of our creation. But what doesn't fit within the paradigms of history or rules of nature, we lump into categories such as force majeure or call them outliers. Though they may not be as plentiful, they must still be calculated as part of the whole equation. I also see people forgetting the basic definition of science and it's methods, which define what MUST occur to make a true statement. Rather than berate anyone for their beliefs in God, I ask that you remember the outliers. They aren't wrong. They just don't fit within the value range to calculate averages, statistically speaking.
Ok, so a meteor, "it could only be a meteor " so smug. How do you explain the almost surgical precision of not just sod. and gom. But several other cities as well.areas around these places were not scorched . This was Intelligent design and delivery. Meteors are not so precise. GOD IS GREAT.
I am sure the God of the universe can aim a meteor.
@@b-manz technically all the meteors have already been aimed 😀 the creator has a whole bunch out in the universe he hasn't even aimed at us. Yet!
If god is that great, why killing all the children in sodom as well? Not my kind of god… i do not see how todlers of 4y old deserve such ‘punishment’
Btw, there is another item that can cause such devastation: a nuclear blast.
@@pascalsierens6299 I can't wait to tell you about how the adults in Sodom sacrificed their children to the false god Molech by contracting a metal statue and heating it up in fire and then sizzled their children to death like a fried egg while beating drums and whatnot to mask the babies screams.
By in the bible it says Cain killing Abel is what gave Abel eternal love and actually killed Cain. So technically by gods standards all those children got eternal life for free so you're point of view is bias
Watch amazing hidden messages of Genesis 19 vs 8
th-cam.com/video/GW6vikzvcKs/w-d-xo.html Part 1.
th-cam.com/video/mTLpZlUgADU/w-d-xo.html Part 2.
I read in a 17th century text describing the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, that mortar for the stones was “ A single, black, and gluteyn mortar from the plains of Asphaltida, wherein stood the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah.
New subrsciber, this video is SUBLIME
I've favored a northern location for awhile.
A few "tiny" issues. Supposedly, Sodom was destroyed just 11 generations after the Biblical Flood killed all but 8 people on Earth. To get even 500,000 on Earth by this time would have required population expansion 1000 percent faster than the speed of what archaeologists believe was possible at this time! But strangely, there are over 500,000 a bodies at Bab Ed-Dhra from this period alone already. Tall El-Hammam may have been destroyed by a meteor like the one in Siberia recently, but people who have no clue about the science of such events were likely to make up a supernatural tale to explain its occurrence. There is a geography fail according to Bill Shlegel -- Biblical literalist -- the Biblical text does not actually fit the geography of Tall el-Hammam. But more problematically, there is a chronology fail. Eugene Merrill (Biblical Literalist) states that for Tall El-Hammam to be Sodom one must deny all of the Biblical Dates before the time of the judges. Even Christian excavators say the site of Tall El-Hammam shows signs of continuous occupation going back 2500 years before the date of its destruction... but... there was a flood that killed all but 8 human beings just 11 generations before that. People were flourishing here at least a couple of hundred years before Young Earth creationists claim the Earth was created. ALl kinds of problems for a literal interpretation of the Bible here.
Watch amazing hidden messages of Genesis 19 vs 8
th-cam.com/video/GW6vikzvcKs/w-d-xo.html Part 1.
th-cam.com/video/mTLpZlUgADU/w-d-xo.html Part 2.
The smoke of the conflagration went up like the smoke of a great furnace. And the fair vale of Siddim became a desolation, a place never to be built up or inhabited-a witness to all generations of the certainty of God's judgments upon transgression. PP 162.2
Watch amazing hidden messages of Genesis 19 vs 8
th-cam.com/video/GW6vikzvcKs/w-d-xo.html Part 1
th-cam.com/video/mTLpZlUgADU/w-d-xo.html Part 2.
You really are so amazing! The abilities that God gave you is such a blessing! Thank you so much!
Watch amazing hidden messages of Genesis 19 vs 8
th-cam.com/video/GW6vikzvcKs/w-d-xo.html Part 1
th-cam.com/video/mTLpZlUgADU/w-d-xo.html Part 2.
They also found the sister city in the US. It's called Congress...
I suggested to the Adventists that extracting deep core samples on the shores of the Dead Sea might produce evidence of S & G. Surely a couple of years later they reported finding green glass in core sample, evidence of the extreme heat as in this article. Unfortunately I do not know where these were found. (1970 approximately)
Interesting topic, great video. Just commenting for algorithms
What is your response to the sites that Ron Wyatt found? They are extremely impressive as to being nothing but owering mounds of ash and sulfur balls?
I wondered the same
I encourage everyone on this comment section to literally take this video with a grain of salt (pun intended), Take a look at this: th-cam.com/video/7uq5LISB6zM/w-d-xo.html
This is the part of preaching the gospel to show the truth of the Bible. Matthew 24:14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.
You’re the man MJ!
Watch amazing hidden messages of Genesis 19 vs 8
th-cam.com/video/GW6vikzvcKs/w-d-xo.html Part 1
th-cam.com/video/mTLpZlUgADU/w-d-xo.html Part 2.
It says in the last days knowledge shall increase. Well, when stories of the Bible are being scientifically proven I'd say that's another "fairy tale" being rendered fact yet again.
@Andrew Harper it all comes down to what you wish to place your faith in. Man or God. The fish can search the bowl day and night for their entire lives and it will never get them any closer to understanding the ways of the one who provides for them.
@Andrew Harper referring to your flat earth comment, Isaiah 40:22, referring to God, states, “He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers." This tells me you dont know a whole lot about the Holy Bible other than what other people seeking to mislead you have told you.
@Andrew Harper IDK man, accurately predicting the destruction of Sodom and Gommorah with the corret time period, correct method of destruction and location does give it pretty good evidence considering the fact that these "fabricators" were supposed shepards who couldnt write...
That's right... you WOULD say that.
Judging from these comments, there is no increase in knowledge.
I doubt anything is left of Sodom and Gomorrah because when God is out to destroy something He will succeed not in part but in full.
They call it California.
I am 100% sure Los Angeles is the new Sodom and Gomorrah. Spreading their sin all over the world.
sounds similar to what's going to happen in the book of revelation
2
3
Your sarcasm is subtle.
San fransicko will be toast
I saw what you did there at 7:15 the holy spirit came down to rain some serious fire. Nice subliminal touch
God's Word is faithful and true.
God’s original pride parade crash
Is this the same place that ron wyatt found, or is this something different?
Diferent also for the love of sweet baby Moses Ron wyatt is a fraud
Another great book by Collins is "Harvest Heartland of Bible Lands" which has all the details. He also he has a great take on the Pharaoh of the Exodus in his book "Let my People Go." If you haven't done so, please have him on.
Watch amazing hidden messages of Genesis 19 vs 8
th-cam.com/video/GW6vikzvcKs/w-d-xo.html Part 1.
th-cam.com/video/mTLpZlUgADU/w-d-xo.html Part 2.
If it was a meteor, they should be able to find iridium in the ash layer.
Watch amazing hidden messages of Genesis 19 vs 8
th-cam.com/video/GW6vikzvcKs/w-d-xo.html Part 1.
th-cam.com/video/mTLpZlUgADU/w-d-xo.html Part 2.
Man!! I just Stan this channel!! Keep up the good work
YHVH is real and his YESHUA is his word will and Lamb.
Your absolutely awesome, superb research and excellent explanation techniques methods you practice helps it all come together so evidentual in chronicle order I thank you for taking the time to share your knowledge with others such as myself and you and your family remain blessed.
We don't need to seek out the past to find it. It's here in our time and it's better known as America.
Reminds me of them finding Troy by just going where The Illiad said it was.
Makes you think they dont want us to find and study these sites.
@Nehemiah Scudder they did find that troy was a real place though. Also what's this about other archeologists shun him?
@Nehemiah Scudder such as
we found it about 60 years ago, along the west coast of N. America. A state called California has a city...L.A. / Hollywood,
L.A. is city of the fallen angels
If they look closely. It can be found in NYC, Chicago, and Detroit.
Amazing! Love from India
Next episode: location of the real Hogwarts found
XD
Watch amazing hidden messages of Genesis 19 vs 8
th-cam.com/video/GW6vikzvcKs/w-d-xo.html Part 1.
th-cam.com/video/mTLpZlUgADU/w-d-xo.html Part 2.
How could the destruction be caused by a meteor air burst when Lot pleaded for (and received) permission to flee to a nearby town which was spared?
It's in Palm Beach , known here as Mara and Lago ...LOL
That’s fake news. 😅
Did you find any Democrats there?😮😂
😂
🤣
Well done video!!
This is not a high standard of scholarship, however, it is conceivable that this particular site was also destroyed at the same time that those five cities of the plain west of the Jordan were destroyed
Late but your vids are fascinating!
I'm glad that this video begins by saying, "New evidence has come to light that SUGGESTS".
Watch amazing hidden messages of Genesis 19 vs 8
th-cam.com/video/GW6vikzvcKs/w-d-xo.html Part 1.
th-cam.com/video/mTLpZlUgADU/w-d-xo.html Part 2.
I think it is quite strange that we have proofs of God's existence and credibility of the bible and Christianity in general and yet the world still doesn't believe. God help us all in Jesus name. I believe in the death and resurrection of Christ Jesus.