INTERSTELLAR - Double Toasted Audio Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 17

  • @jacobmcmillan6787
    @jacobmcmillan6787 10 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    This is one of the best of the year

    • @Judgeholden95
      @Judgeholden95 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Couldn't have said it better myself

  • @bigpictureguys8415
    @bigpictureguys8415 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It’s funny how it’s hard to fully appreciate the truly great movies at the time.

  • @lurkzie
    @lurkzie 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I am still dumbfounded that they only gave it a matinee..this is one of the most profound feats of cinema...clearly they just didnt understand it enough to fully appreciate it

    • @DanielTorres-pw8il
      @DanielTorres-pw8il 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      clearly they dont understand a lot of movies they see. after following these dudes for so long i realized that they are so dumb sometimes and they pretend they are so knowledgeable about movies that they fall flat on their stupid faces.

    • @lurkzie
      @lurkzie 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @BonusPoints So as human beings we interpret our world in 3 dimentions which are width, length and depth which make up volume.
      The wormhole basically transcends him to a higher dimension which we cannot comprehend. You could call it the 4th dimension or the 5th dimension , in this dimension he could observe space time as a tangible surrounding which he was able to manipulate. That is how he was able to interact with the bookcase because from his higher perspective time was a physical construct where any event in his life could be revisited.
      And yes I am a Nolan fanboy 😝

    • @lurkzie
      @lurkzie 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @BonusPoints There's a difference between criticising something you don't understand and calling it a misguided failure or admitting that the concept has gone over your head and has been created for a demographic you do not belong to who would appreciate it for its unique creative merits.
      One response makes the critic look like a pompous, biased idiot and the other response reflects a professional who understands that just because something isn't for them that doesn't make it bad or convoluted

  • @phuktrump
    @phuktrump 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It is better than 2001

  • @JCRProductions24920
    @JCRProductions24920 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    24:15, my favorite bit.

  • @MrAlcazar
    @MrAlcazar 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like this movie the more I see it. My brother rented it and I saw most of it. The rest I pretty much saw all of it in clips on youtube, in 1080p mind you, on my projector, and it looked amazing. I liked the characters, the twist, and the science of it all. The love thing was kind of silly, but it wasn't off-putting. Full Price.

  • @seawood122
    @seawood122 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I never said anything about the actual review. I was just trying to have a little fun with that "first" comment. I don't do them all the time, I'm not one of those assholes. Just goofing of. I was board and just did it. Don't mean to hurt anyone.

  • @nafsiammara
    @nafsiammara 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    We got four.
    Love isn't a relevant thing when dealing with the actual science. I don't know why people say that shit.

    • @nafsiammara
      @nafsiammara 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I... don't know.

    • @maloperverso8118
      @maloperverso8118 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      nafsiammara What the Fuck are You talking about Bro!?

  • @seawood122
    @seawood122 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    FIRST!!!!!

    • @elijahelijah940
      @elijahelijah940 10 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      first idiot

    • @dings215
      @dings215 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      J Seawood- get a life? says the guy still saying 'first!' in 2014. come on, fool. it's not an achievement. comment on the review or the movie or don't comment at all. and in line with that...this is a great review of the flick.