My budget only allows for the lower end of the spectrum and i mostly own Middle Eastern fragrances. After converting prices to US dollar, even 40-50$ is, to me, expensive. We probably all love pretty bottles, but it feels like we end up paying for the container and not the actual fragrance in many cases, especially when the fragrance is kind of "meh". I would much rather feel my money is going towards the quality of the fragrance than having the nagging feeling someone is trying to bamboozle me with shiny bits or weirdness.
Hello! I’d highly recommend you check out my video “Most Beautiful Fragrances | Affordable Gifts Under $50”, there are many gorgeous bottles there with great fragrances inside
I agree with you Anya. If you're gonna pay a high dollar price for a fragrance, the customer should receive a product that's of high quality and practical. For example Tom Ford Lost Cherry, they should have used glass or chrystal for that cap. 🤔🤔
Very respectful and thought-provoking video, Anya. No matter what the price point, I'm in the less is more group and would rather money being spent on the juice instead of bling and a box within a box presentations 😂😂
Happy Holidays, Anya.....Yes, Bond no.9 has a very funky asthetic. I think it only works if you are a collector of the brand but a bottle alone....nope, they're tacky looking alone. I do like those Chanel bottles because to me, they are very inoffensive but so not artistic for something like Chanel. Ugly bottles?...some of the Middle Eastern fragrances come in hideous bottles.
My absolute favorite Chanel bottles are the No. 5 and Coco Mademoiselle options. And yes I am starting to get a bit fed up of all the plastic in ME bottles
That comment about the Kim K perfume bottle cap looking like a belly button gone wrong 🤣🤣
It's so true 😂
My budget only allows for the lower end of the spectrum and i mostly own Middle Eastern fragrances. After converting prices to US dollar, even 40-50$ is, to me, expensive.
We probably all love pretty bottles, but it feels like we end up paying for the container and not the actual fragrance in many cases, especially when the fragrance is kind of "meh".
I would much rather feel my money is going towards the quality of the fragrance than having the nagging feeling someone is trying to bamboozle me with shiny bits or weirdness.
Hello! I’d highly recommend you check out my video “Most Beautiful Fragrances | Affordable Gifts Under $50”, there are many gorgeous bottles there with great fragrances inside
@@anechkafragrances thank you, I have already tracked down and purchased Elizabeth Taylor's Passion on your recommendation, and I love it!
I agree with you Anya. If you're gonna pay a high dollar price for a fragrance, the customer should receive a product that's of high quality and practical. For example Tom Ford Lost Cherry, they should have used glass or chrystal for that cap. 🤔🤔
Very respectful and thought-provoking video, Anya. No matter what the price point, I'm in the less is more group and would rather money being spent on the juice instead of bling and a box within a box presentations 😂😂
Happy Holidays, Anya.....Yes, Bond no.9 has a very funky asthetic. I think it only works if you are a collector of the brand but a bottle alone....nope, they're tacky looking alone. I do like those Chanel bottles because to me, they are very inoffensive but so not artistic for something like Chanel. Ugly bottles?...some of the Middle Eastern fragrances come in hideous bottles.
My absolute favorite Chanel bottles are the No. 5 and Coco Mademoiselle options. And yes I am starting to get a bit fed up of all the plastic in ME bottles
😊❤️
Thanks for watching!