Ауди 80 это чудо инженерной мысли. Попала на своей старушке в ДТП, она мне жизнь спасла. Улетела в канаву правым боком, из повреждений автомобиля мятый порог, и морда немного внутри, ушёл телевизор. Машина на ходу, своим ходом уехала после того, как меня вытащили, ехать до дома 200 км, и ездиет до сих пор после такой аварии, в сервисе были. Сказали, что ездить можно, в феврале встанет на ремонт. Вот это я понимаю машина, а не всякие там китайцы из алюминия, сейчас такие не делают! Из повреждений на мне ушибы и всё. Обожаю свою старенькую Ауди.
All fun and games until you have to replace the engine and/or transmission seeing that the cables are wrapped around them. Which is why this system didn’t last long.
@@alexandrupurtan3573 And you (of course) have to deal with Procon ten if you remove the gearbox to replace the clutch. If you don't look after it, the cable could slip out of its Bracket
I know I'm later, but at the time they didn't have airbag duhh. and I prefer this over airbag because airbag has to be changed after 10 years and you can have problems with the sensors etc.
+sam arnold in the 80s the Airbag was expensive and I assume there were few vendors for selling it. So Audi thought about a differente, les cost expensive solution. It is not just pulling away the steeringwheel, it althow tightens the front seat belts - so u sparse out the belt pretentionr device too.
+Fetii 27GZP None of the "old" vehicels are "save". It was the idea to jsut save the money for the airbag that was expensive back in the days. DIsandvantage is obvious. The mechanic is pulling ver hard if you speed up an crash, pulling it out of your hands. The savety belt gets equivalntly hard tighten up. Some recources claim even low speed was totaly ruinig the car. You can not control the power cause of the fakt that steelrobes are pulling. And it will not operate at a 40° offselt crash. Nice idea but not for today. Yes indeed, the airbagsystem can be dangerous too. Manufactors just wonna make money and give a damen about your savety I assume. Its just for selling.
Beeindruckende Technologie None was safe? What about the cars which didn't have airbags or procon-ten? Were they safer than the cars with airbags or procon-ten? Or was there no difference between them? It seems like there isn't after i read your comment.
+Fetii 27GZP Airbags started in the 1960s in the USA to protect passengers who are not using seat belts. Due to the lag of savety the development and deployment has been shut down till 1980 when Mercedes launched the driver airbag in the S-Class. Porsche 1986 the passenger airbag. But no one was performing "crashtests" and/or was forced to publish results. It was because of Ralph Naider and his book "unsave at any speed" that Lyndon Johnsen introduced the worlds first governemnt organastion that should ensure savety on vehicels. Long time nothing. 1989 European ADAC startet to test the savety of normal cars. 1995 the german stiftung warentest made shocking results on crashtests with deformiable crash barrier. Later than the Euro NCAP was build. Many oter including Australien NCAP and China NCAP were followed. And yes: NO one were publishein any results in crash testes. Vehicles were build way to soft at the passenger cell. No computers in the 70s or 80s were used for simulations like nowerdays. Thats it. IN the year 2000 the waren test made a crashtest of Golf 2 vs GOlf 5 Crashtest. you can watch the cell collapcing at teh A-Level. Sorry, no video here on you tube. None of the old vehicels are considerd to the "save". Security fitment dous not matter if the passenger savety cell is not strong enough.
I doubt that Pro con ten would have already triggered with this damage. To do this, the engine block has to move, which was never the case here. But nice advertising!
Ауди 80 это чудо инженерной мысли. Попала на своей старушке в ДТП, она мне жизнь спасла. Улетела в канаву правым боком, из повреждений автомобиля мятый порог, и морда немного внутри, ушёл телевизор. Машина на ходу, своим ходом уехала после того, как меня вытащили, ехать до дома 200 км, и ездиет до сих пор после такой аварии, в сервисе были. Сказали, что ездить можно, в феврале встанет на ремонт. Вот это я понимаю машина, а не всякие там китайцы из алюминия, сейчас такие не делают! Из повреждений на мне ушибы и всё. Обожаю свою старенькую Ауди.
"....And could save your life" It did, the Procon-Ten saved my life when I had an accident with my audi 100 V6.
This is almost better that an airbag. Mechanical, no electrics that could fail. Genius!
And also stainless steel wires that are inside a plastic housing so they could not rust
All fun and games until you have to replace the engine and/or transmission seeing that the cables are wrapped around them. Which is why this system didn’t last long.
@@Iridiumcosmos I had my whole engine apart including the transmission. It was no big deal, you just needed to see that the wire is under the lip.
Having your whole body snap forward like that can't be good for you.
@@dk2853 .. but hitting a steering wheel is even worse 🤷♀
Daaamn, that's very simple, and very clever system.
And here I am learning stuff I didn't even know my car had :O
Es war ein nicht schlechtes System aber nur ein Übergangssystem 😊 da dann die Airbags günstiger wurden
Car spent so much time in repair shop it was safe...rarely drove it..
Came to see how the system worked and end up watching a rally great advert!
Plus an american pronouncing german names!
They never used the "Vorsprung durch Technik" slogan in the US, so there's no reason why she's American. Neutral English accent doesn't mean American.
She should atleast be able to pronounce "Vorsprung durch Technik" somewhat near correctly...
She says it in German...
You mean "She tries to say it in german" :D
@@japanoiaracing7927 Vorspunck in Tecniek! 😊
@@AlbertArrabal atleast get someone german to say it for crying out loud. it is painful to watch as a german in a car ad.
I wonder if this made repairing the car difficult with that cable in the way ?
Only had to deal with it when I replaced the steering rack ;)
@@alexandrupurtan3573 hated doing racks on 80’s.
@@alexandrupurtan3573 And you (of course) have to deal with Procon ten if you remove the gearbox to replace the clutch. If you don't look after it, the cable could slip out of its Bracket
@@gravey07 the last 80s moved away from the procon system in favor of more normal airbags.
Vosprung durk täknik 👌
Procon-ten was way cooler than the common airbags.
MB ❤️
Mercedes was not as creative as Audi, or did they have a similar technique? 😉
@@ungestrecktOfficial well they had airbags..
or you could just put in airbag
I know I'm later, but at the time they didn't have airbag duhh. and I prefer this over airbag because airbag has to be changed after 10 years and you can have problems with the sensors etc.
+sam arnold in the 80s the Airbag was expensive and I assume there were few vendors for selling it. So Audi thought about a differente, les cost expensive solution. It is not just pulling away the steeringwheel, it althow tightens the front seat belts - so u sparse out the belt pretentionr device too.
+Fetii 27GZP None of the "old" vehicels are "save". It was the idea to jsut save the money for the airbag that was expensive back in the days. DIsandvantage is obvious. The mechanic is pulling ver hard if you speed up an crash, pulling it out of your hands. The savety belt gets equivalntly hard tighten up. Some recources claim even low speed was totaly ruinig the car.
You can not control the power cause of the fakt that steelrobes are pulling. And it will not operate at a 40° offselt crash.
Nice idea but not for today.
Yes indeed, the airbagsystem can be dangerous too. Manufactors just wonna make money and give a damen about your savety I assume. Its just for selling.
Beeindruckende Technologie None was safe? What about the cars which didn't have airbags or procon-ten? Were they safer than the cars with airbags or procon-ten? Or was there no difference between them? It seems like there isn't after i read your comment.
+Fetii 27GZP Airbags started in the 1960s in the USA to protect passengers who are not using seat belts. Due to the lag of savety the development and deployment has been shut down till 1980 when Mercedes launched the driver airbag in the S-Class. Porsche 1986 the passenger airbag.
But no one was performing "crashtests" and/or was forced to publish results. It was because of Ralph Naider and his book "unsave at any speed" that Lyndon Johnsen introduced the worlds first governemnt organastion that should ensure savety on vehicels.
Long time nothing. 1989 European ADAC startet to test the savety of normal cars. 1995 the german stiftung warentest made shocking results on crashtests with deformiable crash barrier. Later than the Euro NCAP was build. Many oter including Australien NCAP and China NCAP were followed.
And yes: NO one were publishein any results in crash testes. Vehicles were build way to soft at the passenger cell. No computers in the 70s or 80s were used for simulations like nowerdays.
Thats it. IN the year 2000 the waren test made a crashtest of Golf 2 vs GOlf 5 Crashtest. you can watch the cell collapcing at teh A-Level. Sorry, no video here on you tube.
None of the old vehicels are considerd to the "save". Security fitment dous not matter if the passenger savety cell is not strong enough.
Бочка - топ
I doubt that Pro con ten would have already triggered with this damage. To do this, the engine block has to move, which was never the case here. But nice advertising!
ドイツと.言うかヨーロッパて機械式の装置が好きだよね
機械式て、頭が良くないと無理
電子制御は、デバイス ユニットの
汎用で誰にも構築出来る
Deutsch
@@nichtnennenswert818 Danke.
где русские?
Я есть уйгур с Казахстана 🤣
Ьуь
Audi 🤣💩💩💩💩