PS11 Inductance of Composite Conductor Lines

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 35

  • @prasannakumar2638
    @prasannakumar2638 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you sir. Was search in a search of detailed explanation like this.

  • @mamatha_999_9
    @mamatha_999_9 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    @12:20 the values of L1 & L2 are same??
    For L2 i think it is d21 d22....
    Please clarify sir...

  • @aniketgangwar3867
    @aniketgangwar3867 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir how can be use equation 2 directly in composite conductor case as we derived eq 2 by the assumption that sum of current is zero wheras in composite case the sum of current in each conductor is I not 0
    Time at 8:57

    • @aniketgangwar3867
      @aniketgangwar3867 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lecturesinelectricaleng but sir how eq 2 applicable for a same phase conductor whose sum of current is not zero

  • @sujathakondala8237
    @sujathakondala8237 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir at 13:40 in the video as you said every strand in the conductor is in parallel so for effective inductance we can directly solve and get it know sir what is the use of taking avg and then dividing by x and solving....?!

  • @ashokmyla7395
    @ashokmyla7395 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good lectures comes from only good heart sir

  • @electricalengineeringvideo6595
    @electricalengineeringvideo6595 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, Did you forget to write currents I1 and I2 in equations lambda1p1 and lambda_1p2 respectively at 3:39? please respond sir

  • @053_abdulhannanbhat8
    @053_abdulhannanbhat8 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir at 11:26 you write inductance due to strand 1= lamda1/(i/x), but sir my question is the flux that is linking is because of current through conductor 1 and also rest of the current through other conductors so how come we divide lamda1 by i/x which is the current through strand 1 to get the inductance of strand 1

  • @sankhamitra3862
    @sankhamitra3862 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir have you taught transients in power system topic already or you will teach this topic in future??

  • @kousikmullapudi5126
    @kousikmullapudi5126 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir the lecture is awesome ..but only one doubt on d12.you are saying that flux is not linking with the conductor 1 and again why do you take distance between 1,2 and I didn't understand the terminology what you have said about d12

    • @kousikmullapudi5126
      @kousikmullapudi5126 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      3:25 sir

    • @kumkumsinghal8875
      @kumkumsinghal8875 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lecturesinelectricaleng sir this is what i m not getting that why did u not include the flux produced between d12 distance
      sir i have watched lecture 9,10 as u said but still i didn't get
      sir plzz clear my doubt

  • @pavanambala9594
    @pavanambala9594 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    as usual excellent lecture sir

  • @balajiyadavpassimpalli7814
    @balajiyadavpassimpalli7814 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello sir, (@10:25)
    When we multiply 1/x inside.... it'll become xth root...
    lly, when we multiply 1/y inside .... it'll become yth root...
    then why are we putting yth root in the numerator...
    as the first term is x..???

  • @sureshkondru3154
    @sureshkondru3154 ปีที่แล้ว

    Heartfully thank you sir..

  • @rajpurohitnikita7248
    @rajpurohitnikita7248 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir, what is the difference between loop inductance and inductance?

  • @Kajukatli-m2l
    @Kajukatli-m2l 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    sir why do the flux between the conductors is not considered in the flux linkage?

    • @vijayvarma5501
      @vijayvarma5501 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because we are only considered flux linkage in between conducted 1 and p.
      And flux formed by 2 but only condidering flux linkage between 1 and p by the current of I2. So from d12 to dp considered

  • @surendrakverma555
    @surendrakverma555 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good lecture Sir. Thanks 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @Papyrususer
    @Papyrususer ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, why did you include the flux lines beyond conductor 1 that is, the flux lines at point P?

    • @Papyrususer
      @Papyrususer ปีที่แล้ว

      Surely, the flux lines linking conductor 1 are between d12 and (d12+2r1). I don't understand why we are considering till the point P.

  • @tuhinsardar6749
    @tuhinsardar6749 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir 😊😊

  • @hanumanthreddy6791
    @hanumanthreddy6791 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir.. How to download notes of this lectures.. Can you provide link

  • @varungunjal347
    @varungunjal347 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you sir very nice explanation

  • @SuperAstha
    @SuperAstha 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, this Lambda_1 is the flux linkage due self as well as mutual flux(due to current in wire 2 strands). Yet, to calculate L1, you are dividing lambda_1 by I/x. But if we consider mutual flux due wire 2 then to calculate L1(total inductance due self and mutual flux), the flux linkage due strands in wire 1 should be divided by I/x and mutual flux linkage due to current in wire 2 strands should divided by I/y. Please help me with this. Thanks

    • @SuperAstha
      @SuperAstha 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lecturesinelectricaleng Dear Sir, thanks for the reply. The timeline I am referring to is 11:18.

    • @ravikumar-du6vb
      @ravikumar-du6vb ปีที่แล้ว

      Please tell what is the answer

  • @SD-se4sn
    @SD-se4sn 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir i would request you to upload videos as per MAKAUT syllabus for EE students...MAKAUT is a university in WB with lots of Engineering colleges under it...a large number of students are now at their homes without books due to covid issues...we all had left our hostels in a rush and didn't bring any...if u refer to the syllabus in makaut website and make a playlist on different subjects...you will surely attract and help a lot of students...❤️

  • @abhinavpushkarna3143
    @abhinavpushkarna3143 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there any difference between horizontal spacing and vertical spacing of conductor?