1:39 You read what has always been on my mind. After obtaining my BSc while being unemployed, the question came to my mind “Why only men in Economic thought, What are the contributions of women to the Discipline?” I wish I asked during my undergrad
Thank you for this video! I have a discussion question comparing Neoclassical economics with Keynesian and all the websites I was reading just had wording that confused me. This explained things perfectly and in a way that helped me understand.
Oh...your so good at explaining things in a such a simple manner..and wow.. the attitude..it's just amazing..great work..expecting many more such videos very sooner from your side...
i love how you explain economics its exactly how i feel inside my mind whenever i'm on class and all i feel is that; oh my god i can explain it much easier ... keep it up !
Adam Smith was a professor of "Moral Philosophy." His great book, The Wealth of Nations, was a thesis on political economics. By removing the politics and philosophy from the science of economics it has made our systems seem inevitable. It is time to reclaim our agency in how the world is organized.
It's only amazing to you because clearly you don't know economics! Amazing is the fact that any random man with limited knowledge about any subject can make a video full of mistakes about economics. He probably read a page about economic thought and he thinks he is capable of teaching hahaa Ignorance can only spread ignorance lol. Menger never used the word utility. Let alone marginal utility and DMU. Jevons himself didnt use the word marginal. If you want to learn about something, read the original manuscript. Not a 5 min video by a non professional... and by the way. Menger never used mathematics in his writings!
My man - can you come teach in Australia? My lecturer explained the same thing in a way that made me want to jump in front of a bus (I didn't think I would ever get it). Appreciate you.
To be fair. It's all good and well to get excited, because "Muh... Has graphs and mathematics". But so much of it assumes an ideal case, with premises and parameters oft ignored expediently. And then you observe emergent trends that sees producers promote irrational thought patterns in consumers, or even the repression of quality public education, simply to keep the iterations ticking over. The missing link is sustainability. In lieu of the quality of sustainability, all claims to rationality are disqualified. Naturally. With zero prejudice, not that the end result is any less terminal. By reality. It's often enough like listening to habitual speedsters bragging that they have "skills". And all the road problems are the fault of unskilled drivers. Especially those who don't go over the speed limit in the "fast lane". When really they tend to conflate the fact that they've had no accidents thus far, terminal or otherwise, with actual superhuman ability. Which is of course the exception, and not the norm. And all they've really experienced thus far is dumb luck.
This is how teachers should teach PERIOD!!! Thanks alot
Hey man really good video, it's refreshing to see someone explain economics with a bit of personality
I appreciate that! That's very kind of you! bradcartright.com
1:39 You read what has always been on my mind. After obtaining my BSc while being unemployed, the question came to my mind “Why only men in Economic thought, What are the contributions of women to the Discipline?” I wish I asked during my undergrad
I’m struggling with my presentation about Classical and Neoclassical economic theories but your videos really helped me a lot. Thanks 😊
Hi Brad. Your way of explaining things so clearly shows how well you understand Neoclassical Economics. Thanks a lot!
Glad it was helpful!
Dear Brad words are limitations for praising your high class explanation of topics. You are amazing. Keep shining always.
Super kind, thank you!
Thank you for this video! I have a discussion question comparing Neoclassical economics with Keynesian and all the websites I was reading just had wording that confused me. This explained things perfectly and in a way that helped me understand.
Yes, that's great news!
Thank you very much. The ease with which you explain and simplify the information is wonderful. I hope to be like you in the future❤
Oh...your so good at explaining things in a such a simple manner..and wow.. the attitude..it's just amazing..great work..expecting many more such videos very sooner from your side...
Super kind, thank you!
i love how you explain economics its exactly how i feel inside my mind whenever i'm on class and all i feel is that; oh my god i can explain it much easier ... keep it up !
Super kind, thank you!
Congrats on your educational initiative!
Adam Smith was a professor of "Moral Philosophy." His great book, The Wealth of Nations, was a thesis on political economics. By removing the politics and philosophy from the science of economics it has made our systems seem inevitable. It is time to reclaim our agency in how the world is organized.
Great video, glad I found this.
Amazing and Very Well Explained By You through your Knowledge regarding Subject and topic . thankyou
So nice of you
I love the figet spinner example, really helps me picture it easily
Loved your way of clearing the concept in such a easy step and clearing concept ❤️
Thanks a lot 😊
amazing video helped me a lot (Postgraduate development student) :)
It's only amazing to you because clearly you don't know economics! Amazing is the fact that any random man with limited knowledge about any subject can make a video full of mistakes about economics. He probably read a page about economic thought and he thinks he is capable of teaching hahaa Ignorance can only spread ignorance lol. Menger never used the word utility. Let alone marginal utility and DMU. Jevons himself didnt use the word marginal. If you want to learn about something, read the original manuscript. Not a 5 min video by a non professional... and by the way. Menger never used mathematics in his writings!
I loved the way u explained everything in such a easy way🥰
Your explanation is top notch.👌👏
Thanks a lot
Thank you so much! Now I'm beginning to understand all the articles I have to read!
Good explanation, thank you!
My man - can you come teach in Australia? My lecturer explained the same thing in a way that made me want to jump in front of a bus (I didn't think I would ever get it). Appreciate you.
Ha! Thank you Blair--you made me laugh! Thanks for the kind words and good luck!
Wow you definitely have a talent of teaching❤
thank you, you make it so easy to understand.
A great explanation. Thank you a lot.
So helpful man keep it up
Great video!!
thats super helpful thx.
Is that Chile?
Thanks man
Very nice 🌸
Amen, on the fidget spinners; I'll save money and just twiddle my thumbs.
I thought the opening was an ad
To be fair. It's all good and well to get excited, because "Muh... Has graphs and mathematics". But so much of it assumes an ideal case, with premises and parameters oft ignored expediently. And then you observe emergent trends that sees producers promote irrational thought patterns in consumers, or even the repression of quality public education, simply to keep the iterations ticking over. The missing link is sustainability. In lieu of the quality of sustainability, all claims to rationality are disqualified. Naturally. With zero prejudice, not that the end result is any less terminal. By reality.
It's often enough like listening to habitual speedsters bragging that they have "skills". And all the road problems are the fault of unskilled drivers. Especially those who don't go over the speed limit in the "fast lane". When really they tend to conflate the fact that they've had no accidents thus far, terminal or otherwise, with actual superhuman ability. Which is of course the exception, and not the norm. And all they've really experienced thus far is dumb luck.