Pick up one of your magnets and stare at it's center. with the S pole facing you. Imagine a vortex emanating from the center. Now imagine a wire parallel with the S pole face of your magnet, moving through this vortex, from one side to another. Slow it down. What do you see? (you will see that for half of the trip the vortex is PUSHING the energy in the wire one way, and for the other half it will push it the other way). You have now understood everything you need to know. Think "how" to eliminate half of this trip. You might employ a "special commutator" like Joe Newman did to reverse the polarity as the wire (coil) passes the center of the magnet. Or you could use a special arrangement of magnets with this new understanding. Best.
This is a very good explanation of the (mostly misunderstood) magnetic field. You mention "Think 'how' to eliminate half of this trip." Does it need to be eliminated? It seems better that it should be utilized properly...for example, in this scenario reversing the parallel wire. I am assuming this is leading to the key to Newman's motor?? Please pass along your thoughts...
A couple observations and thoughts; All the coils around it are adding 'work' to the motor being run, so that is a lot of loss here, however, you could use all those being affected to charge a source and measure the total input to total output of the combined coils, to prove likely that it still doesn't work. At least it would account for the extra load. I thought the concept was to utilize the supposed natural magnetic field of the copper to induce current back to the batteries. My thought is that it could have been just heating up the batteries, and they seemed charged more than when they went in (Newmans demonstrations). But maybe there is a high frequency feed back from the copper (he did say it gets used up - converted - which would make copper the fuel) that we aren't looking for to measure. That is charging the batteries - as they would act/are capacitors that would/does stabilize (compress) frequencies - bringing the supposed high frequencies not being measured down to a frequency that can be stored. eh....
The added coils don't matter much as the torque if you have built any of these are significant to say the least. When ever you are discharging you need a bank or array for a start as batteries do not like to discharge and be charged or pass through charging it shall destroy the battery (dendrites). The charge being high voltage shall produce smaller charged particles on the formed plate, bedini showed this in one of his videos. The magnet passes the copper and induces the field into it as it passes and yes it shall create heat as movement does that. joe said a lot I feel he created his luck through tenacity of purpose. Correct the array would act as a capacitor although frequencies are better done matching the coils. Also how to defeat lorentz law is the numero uno!
The more windings you have the larger is the EMF. So, for a given voltage your will see a lower rpm as for a coil with lower EMF. This is clear, not surprizing. More windings means a higher voltage for a desired rpm. That's why, high speed synchronous RC motors for model aircrafts have just a few windings of larger diameter wire or multifilar wire (skin effect) on each of the poles.
Well smaller Newman motors like this will only have around 75 % of efficiency mechanically... You will not get them to overunity in the mechanical output... You might try to put in some caps between some tap points inside the coil, so to enhance the "stray capacitance" of the coil ! This will have an effect like the first big few Neman motors had, who had massive number of thicker gauge wires, which has a pretty high capacitance. Thus the characteristice of the coil will completely change and it will have also a pretty huge capacitance in the 1 to 10 uF range... This is why also these big Back Spike pulses occured on the bigger sized motors...and then the mechanical efficiency also went up- The first big Newman motor with the huge 700 pound magnet rotor was claimed to produce 700 % mechanical output power by some calculations from Dr. Hastings... So soldering a few High voltage capacitors into the coils at different positions could help to have this coil act more like an LC network, which reacts differently to the breakings of the commutator... Probably it must be in a mechanical - Electronical Resonance of the frequencies of the commutator frequency and the LC parameters of the coil´s resonance frequency then....So switching the enhanced coil with the right frequency is needed and also have the right capacity to enhance the BackEMF spikes... Hope this helps. Regards, Stefan. P.S. Do you know, if Dr. Hastings and Ralph Hartwell are still around ? Maybe they can add some more insigths as they had studied the first Big Newman motors for the longest time...If they should read this, maybe they can contact me or post some comments too ...Many thanks.
I have not kept up on what happened to Dr Hastings or Ralph Hartwell, but they had some interesting things to say in this video. th-cam.com/video/CrJIzrmX1mI/w-d-xo.html My interest in experimenting with these ideas is not real strong at this point, but if there is something more to be discovered I hope someone figures it out.
How can you state 75% ? I would state 90%(There have been many qualified people and other that would also align to this) counting the mechanical efficiency or above cop 1. I would state that you have not built or invented much and state how things cannot be achieved as you are told this so you like many accept this. Capacitors as they are correctly called have shown that they produce a much improved input. Also to correct you it was a Newman Generator not Motor. The thicker wire was for amperage not capacitance that was the longer thinner wire. i have keenly watched the other people that worked with Jospeh and they have not recreated his work. Spark is bad, supress the spark as it is loss. I have seen many many overqualified people never achieve what an unlearned hard headed determined mind can. Surely this is over unity th-cam.com/video/nroBcB-42aU/w-d-xo.html no1 has replicated this. Keep going Deryk G.G.
Hmm, interesting, maybe research what will happen, if you now will cut out the spool of wire and use an equal amount of ohmic resistor instead of the spool of wire...will the motor then still turn at the same speed or is it related to the L inductance of the spool of wire ?
@@GrantsPassTVRepair No I meant, cut the spool out, measure its resistance and put a normal rsistor there in series with the motor, so it still has the same ohmical resistance as with the spool. Will the motor still runs at the same speed shown ? If not the coil you have outside the motor, that you already unwound would have an effect on the motor... also does it position effect the motor somehow, so placing it a few feet away, does it affect the motor speed, if the spool is still connected ? Many thanks. Regards, Stefan.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair If the spool of wire standing next to the motor has any effect of the speedup or to the motor function and if the position of it will have any effect ??
Almost twice as fast, I'm sure as you said about the electro motor response makes all the sense, a bigger coil means a stronger magnet force etc.. So, all the info is still holding water.
Building this motor made me a skeptical that anyone can ever generate more energy output than input from a motor like this because of the Counter Electromotive Force which slowed the motor down as I added more wire or magnets to it.. Before I built this motor and observed the results, I hoped that that adding more magnets or wire to the motor would make the rotating shaft turn faster, but the complete opposite was true.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair Thank you for letting me know Grant. I will keep on trying to make things happen even if the economy keeps on kicking me right in the private parts. Good luck and please make more videos too fella. vf
You have the same DC resistance at still stand 1:44 vid. but when the motor spin because you have less turns of wire around magnets the resistance is lower, more amps get in coil more faster the rotor spin. I'm sure you all ready now that.
Don't give up ! Watch first 3 min. of this video on youtube --Gerard Morin: Hidden technology the world doesn't tell us about-- Gerard Morin TH-cam Channels.
would you be able to give me suggestions on how to troubleshoot my vcr? the power button blinks and when I press it, it takes my tape, it goes around the big spinning thing, but then it all reverses, it ejects my tape, and turns off again to a blinking power button. any suggestions
@@GrantsPassTVRepair this video is very clear and easy to follow, thank you! I think I have determined I might have a dirty mode switch repair but I can't find any clear video to show how to clean it
pancake on pancake layers connected in parallel and you will be surprised. It is essentially what creative science and research sells in their SP500 plans
Your power controlling solution seems very inefficient. Use a mosfet or something for much better conductivity. A longer pulse duration could increase your rpm too.
I understand, but no matter how efficiently I switch my input there will still be the problem of how to overcome the opposing magnetic field which is generated as my rotating magnetic field cuts across the coil windings.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair some mosfets are for motors and are already protected but you could still use a diode on the drain for when the rotor turns over and induces a negative voltage.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair that's easily removed and captured if you know what you're doing .After it's captured the rotor will speed up and the sparks on the commutator will be gone .Also caps make a huge difference on performance and removing the sparks in the commutator..
The Newman motor is not very efficient because you have a lot of unguided flux. For an iron free motor it is better to work with the axial flux principle. The rotor is just a disk carrying the permanent magnets on a circle around the axis with changing polarity. It rotates in the vicinity of another disk carrying pancake coils. The best is 3-phase operation as synchronous motor. So you need 4 magnet poles and 3 coil poles or multiples of this. You can also use 2 magnet poles and 3 coil poles or multiples of this. This doubles the speed, but the EMF signature is not the best. So it works with lower efficiency.
I would agree with your statement on the "unguided flux" being inefficient, Newman must have thought that was important to avoid the iron core considering how he designed his motors.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair for this design it is impossible to operate the coils close to the permanent magnets. For axial flux design you can go as close as the thermal dilatation allows. I have operated an axial flux rotor which was integrated in the turbine rotor of 50 mm diameter. The coils were at a distance of 0.25 mm to the surface of the permanent magnet disks. So almost all flux penetrated the coils. No iron was needed, because I operated in the near field. The turbine power was around 1 kW. Using this integrated configuration there was also no need to transfer torque though the turbine shaft. The torque is directly transfered from the magnets to the coils.
@@gkdresden You're speaking in terms above my ability to follow everything you're saying, but I can understand your point about the magnetic flux being to distant from the permanent magnets.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair There are several videos about axial flux motors / generators on youtube. I think you get the point while watching one or the other of them.
Your coil configuration and symmetry is not efficiently interacting with the magnets. Your magnet mass is higher than the coil itself. What is required is a heavy improvement in coil size.
man that's one LONGGGGGG Newman motor. Very cool and sound explanation
i appreciate very much your sincerity. so hard to find on free energy movie makers
I came for the repair vids, Subbed for the experiments. I'm loving your work with electromagnatism.
Pick up one of your magnets and stare at it's center. with the S pole facing you. Imagine a vortex emanating from the center. Now imagine a wire parallel with the S pole face of your magnet, moving through this vortex, from one side to another. Slow it down. What do you see? (you will see that for half of the trip the vortex is PUSHING the energy in the wire one way, and for the other half it will push it the other way). You have now understood everything you need to know. Think "how" to eliminate half of this trip. You might employ a "special commutator" like Joe Newman did to reverse the polarity as the wire (coil) passes the center of the magnet. Or you could use a special arrangement of magnets with this new understanding. Best.
This is a very good explanation of the (mostly misunderstood) magnetic field. You mention "Think 'how' to eliminate half of this trip."
Does it need to be eliminated? It seems better that it should be utilized properly...for example, in this scenario reversing the parallel wire. I am assuming this is leading to the key to Newman's motor??
Please pass along your thoughts...
nice idea it is faster, that tread mill motor is going to be a wind gen sometime, thanks for your time
A couple observations and thoughts; All the coils around it are adding 'work' to the motor being run, so that is a lot of loss here, however, you could use all those being affected to charge a source and measure the total input to total output of the combined coils, to prove likely that it still doesn't work. At least it would account for the extra load. I thought the concept was to utilize the supposed natural magnetic field of the copper to induce current back to the batteries. My thought is that it could have been just heating up the batteries, and they seemed charged more than when they went in (Newmans demonstrations). But maybe there is a high frequency feed back from the copper (he did say it gets used up - converted - which would make copper the fuel) that we aren't looking for to measure. That is charging the batteries - as they would act/are capacitors that would/does stabilize (compress) frequencies - bringing the supposed high frequencies not being measured down to a frequency that can be stored. eh....
The added coils don't matter much as the torque if you have built any of these are significant to say the least. When ever you are discharging you need a bank or array for a start as batteries do not like to discharge and be charged or pass through charging it shall destroy the battery (dendrites). The charge being high voltage shall produce smaller charged particles on the formed plate, bedini showed this in one of his videos. The magnet passes the copper and induces the field into it as it passes and yes it shall create heat as movement does that. joe said a lot I feel he created his luck through tenacity of purpose. Correct the array would act as a capacitor although frequencies are better done matching the coils. Also how to defeat lorentz law is the numero uno!
The more windings you have the larger is the EMF. So, for a given voltage your will see a lower rpm as for a coil with lower EMF. This is clear, not surprizing. More windings means a higher voltage for a desired rpm. That's why, high speed synchronous RC motors for model aircrafts have just a few windings of larger diameter wire or multifilar wire (skin effect) on each of the poles.
Well smaller Newman motors like this will only have around 75 % of efficiency mechanically...
You will not get them to overunity in the mechanical output...
You might try to put in some caps between some tap points inside the coil, so to enhance the "stray capacitance" of the coil !
This will have an effect like the first big few Neman motors had, who had massive number of thicker gauge wires, which has a pretty high capacitance.
Thus the characteristice of the coil will completely change and it will have also a pretty huge capacitance in the 1 to 10 uF range... This is why also these big Back Spike pulses occured on the bigger sized motors...and then the mechanical efficiency also went up-
The first big Newman motor with the huge 700 pound magnet rotor was claimed to produce 700 % mechanical output power by some calculations from Dr. Hastings...
So soldering a few High voltage capacitors into the coils at different positions could help to have this coil act more like an LC network, which reacts differently to the breakings of the commutator... Probably it must be in a mechanical - Electronical Resonance of the frequencies of the commutator frequency and the LC parameters of the coil´s resonance frequency then....So switching the enhanced coil with the right frequency is needed and also have the right capacity to enhance the BackEMF spikes... Hope this helps. Regards, Stefan. P.S. Do you know, if Dr. Hastings and Ralph Hartwell are still around ? Maybe they can add some more insigths as they had studied the first Big Newman motors for the longest time...If they should read this, maybe they can contact me or post some comments too ...Many thanks.
I have not kept up on what happened to Dr Hastings or Ralph Hartwell, but they had some interesting things to say in this video. th-cam.com/video/CrJIzrmX1mI/w-d-xo.html My interest in experimenting with these ideas is not real strong at this point, but if there is something more to be discovered I hope someone figures it out.
How can you state 75% ? I would state 90%(There have been many qualified people and other that would also align to this) counting the mechanical efficiency or above cop 1.
I would state that you have not built or invented much and state how things cannot be achieved as you are told this so you like many accept this.
Capacitors as they are correctly called have shown that they produce a much improved input.
Also to correct you it was a Newman Generator not Motor. The thicker wire was for amperage not capacitance that was the longer thinner wire.
i have keenly watched the other people that worked with Jospeh and they have not recreated his work.
Spark is bad, supress the spark as it is loss.
I have seen many many overqualified people never achieve what an unlearned hard headed determined mind can.
Surely this is over unity th-cam.com/video/nroBcB-42aU/w-d-xo.html no1 has replicated this.
Keep going Deryk
G.G.
Liked,shared. All my best.
Thanks Bobby.
And what effect would changing the impedance of your spooled section of wire by inserting a steel rod into it?
the reactance would undoubtedly go up, but the commutators duty cycle is so long I would not expect any significant slowdown.
Hmm, interesting, maybe research what will happen, if you now will cut out the spool of wire and use an equal amount of ohmic resistor instead of the spool of wire...will the motor then still turn at the same speed or is it related to the L inductance of the spool of wire ?
I'm not sure I understand what you're asking, but If you're talking about winding the coil with a high resistance wire I would expect it to slow down.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair No I meant, cut the spool out, measure its resistance and put a normal rsistor there in series with the motor, so it still has the same ohmical resistance as with the spool. Will the motor still runs at the same speed shown ? If not the coil you have outside the motor, that you already unwound would have an effect on the motor... also does it position effect the motor somehow, so placing it a few feet away, does it affect the motor speed, if the spool is still connected ? Many thanks. Regards, Stefan.
I understand. I've since disassembled the motor but I what would such an experiment determin?
@@GrantsPassTVRepair If the spool of wire standing next to the motor has any effect of the speedup or to the motor function and if the position of it will have any effect ??
Dude, you've been in isolation too long! LOL
;-)
If you haven't seen Part 1 click here. th-cam.com/video/MVkSoHrTGMs/w-d-xo.html
Almost twice as fast, I'm sure as you said about the electro motor response makes all the sense, a bigger coil means a stronger magnet force etc..
So, all the info is still holding water.
Building this motor made me a skeptical that anyone can ever generate more energy output than input from a motor like this because of the Counter Electromotive Force which slowed the motor down as I added more wire or magnets to it.. Before I built this motor and observed the results, I hoped that that adding more magnets or wire to the motor would make the rotating shaft turn faster, but the complete opposite was true.
When you have got to have a 200% efficient DC motor how much money will you asks for?
If I came up with a motor that was 200 percent efficient I'd be famous.
@@GrantsPassTVRepairspeed depends upon voltage nd frequency so try to raise both up...
I am wondering how much did the 62 pounds of wire cost you and where is the best place to get it at a fair price Grant ??? Nice work too. vf
Due to inflation the cost of the wire is probably 6 or 7 hundred at this time. I'm not sure where to get a good deal on wire other than garage sales.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair Thank you for letting me know Grant. I will keep on trying to make things happen even if the economy keeps on kicking me right in the private parts. Good luck and please make more videos too fella. vf
@@victoryfirst2878 Thank you.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair Your welcome Grant.
You have the same DC resistance at still stand 1:44 vid. but when the motor spin because you have less turns of wire around magnets the resistance is lower, more amps get in coil more faster the rotor spin. I'm sure you all ready now that.
Hi.
What gauge of this wire and how many turns in coil?
I used 12 gauge wire on this one, but on a previous model I used 30 pounds of 30 gauge.
Don't give up !
Watch first 3 min. of this video on youtube --Gerard Morin: Hidden technology the world doesn't tell us about-- Gerard Morin TH-cam Channels.
I've watched some of his videos. He lacks in understanding the fundamentals. revolution-green.com/gerard-morins-free-energy-delusion/
would you be able to give me suggestions on how to troubleshoot my vcr? the power button blinks and when I press it, it takes my tape, it goes around the big spinning thing, but then it all reverses, it ejects my tape, and turns off again to a blinking power button. any suggestions
I need to see it, but I did put three videos out on repairing VCRs. if you search through my website you will find them. www.tvrepairinfo.com/
You might find this video helpful. th-cam.com/video/0_G2y5VDa0w/w-d-xo.html
@@GrantsPassTVRepair am I able to send you a quick 20 second video?
@@GrantsPassTVRepair this video is very clear and easy to follow, thank you! I think I have determined I might have a dirty mode switch repair but I can't find any clear video to show how to clean it
pancake on pancake layers connected in parallel and you will be surprised.
It is essentially what creative science and research sells in their SP500 plans
Isn't that a pulse motor?
No
Your power controlling solution seems very inefficient. Use a mosfet or something for much better conductivity. A longer pulse duration could increase your rpm too.
I understand, but no matter how efficiently I switch my input there will still be the problem of how to overcome the opposing magnetic field which is generated as my rotating magnetic field cuts across the coil windings.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair some mosfets are for motors and are already protected but you could still use a diode on the drain for when the rotor turns over and induces a negative voltage.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair that's easily removed and captured if you know what you're doing .After it's captured the rotor will speed up and the sparks on the commutator will be gone .Also caps make a huge difference on performance and removing the sparks in the commutator..
87 pound Newman Motor th-cam.com/video/DKxCPJKRM9Q/w-d-xo.html
The Newman motor is not very efficient because you have a lot of unguided flux. For an iron free motor it is better to work with the axial flux principle. The rotor is just a disk carrying the permanent magnets on a circle around the axis with changing polarity. It rotates in the vicinity of another disk carrying pancake coils. The best is 3-phase operation as synchronous motor. So you need 4 magnet poles and 3 coil poles or multiples of this. You can also use 2 magnet poles and 3 coil poles or multiples of this. This doubles the speed, but the EMF signature is not the best. So it works with lower efficiency.
I would agree with your statement on the "unguided flux" being inefficient, Newman must have thought that was important to avoid the iron core considering how he designed his motors.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair for this design it is impossible to operate the coils close to the permanent magnets. For axial flux design you can go as close as the thermal dilatation allows.
I have operated an axial flux rotor which was integrated in the turbine rotor of 50 mm diameter. The coils were at a distance of 0.25 mm to the surface of the permanent magnet disks.
So almost all flux penetrated the coils. No iron was needed, because I operated in the near field. The turbine power was around 1 kW.
Using this integrated configuration there was also no need to transfer torque though the turbine shaft. The torque is directly transfered from the magnets to the coils.
@@gkdresden You're speaking in terms above my ability to follow everything you're saying, but I can understand your point about the magnetic flux being to distant from the permanent magnets.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair There are several videos about axial flux motors / generators on youtube. I think you get the point while watching one or the other of them.
@@gkdresden Thanks I'll check them out.
Your coil configuration and symmetry is not efficiently interacting with the magnets.
Your magnet mass is higher than the coil itself. What is required is a heavy improvement in coil size.