Just a small comment. The existence of a tachyon in a quantum theory isn't necessarily problematic. It just signals that you're trying to do perturbation theory around the wrong vacuum. This issue arises e.g. in the Higgs mechanism.
If spacetime is implemented by axion like particles, then it should be possible for the Planck plasms breaching the event horizon at the poles of SMBH to push those axions out of the way (or heat them to Planck plasma level) and the jet should then be able to go superluminal. This would explain all those strange jet readings that look superluminal and are explained away as small observing angles (yeah right).
There are 10-99th loops. Looks sorta like Morae' patterns in higher dimensions. The waves are harmonic all the way down to here now. Good luck with that.
What if gravity is the tachyeon? I mean, nothing can travel through space faster than light, but in General relativity gravity is the curvature of spacetime, and since space can expand faster than light, maybe gravity can also. Take the event horizon of a black hole, gravity pulls so hard light can't escape, but what about further past it, closer to the singularity?
Tachyons exists like black holes do. They are so amazing that must exists like black holes. The problem is that we will probably never be able to probe it, unless black holes that are everywhere and easy to detect.
That thumbnail looks pretty accurate to me. Just remember that when you spin something around its making gravity happen in it's relativistic time template. The momentum is carried by the torsion on the gyrodesic direction of thrust on Euler manifolds. Simple.
Very funny to watch the history of science as a soap opera. "In the previous episode...". Who is the vilain? Who will save the day? Will them marry at the end and live happy forever?
By definition, does not everything stop at absolute zero? I am sure that at even a single femtokelvin, something will vibrate, but it does this mean true absolute zero is impossible?
Why don't you try explaining spacetime with a virtual point that expands at the speed of light and have an available EM bandwidth that can become excited. These virtual points, call them Planck units, have units of energy-time. Their surface area A = 4pi(ct)^2 overlap with other Planck units to create "the present". The enclosed volume is "the past". Multiple Planck units, at big bang energies, can overlap to create standard model particles. Try doing it that way!
0:04 1960 -2020 ----- over 60 years. Wow! The rest of your math is good, though, right? There may be a problem with your understanding of reality. That misunderstanding may carry-over to everyone in this field.
Hopefully you can address my comments on the speed of Light. There is no argument about the speed that fluctuates between psychical mediums, But for example, we assume that the speed of light near Alpha Centauri is the same as the speed of light here on Earth. what I'm saying is we just assuming it, we don't know about that right, do we? The facts are that we cannot know what is going on everywhere in the universe, so we cannot determine that the speed of light (electromagnetic wave speed) is constant! We can assume different possibilities, (just like we assuming that it is constant), what if light is emitted from someplace near us. maybe it emitted from the center of the earth. and maybe is emitted from life. maybe there is million more possibility? maybe after you laugh for a few seconds you will maybe realize that this is not a completely unbelievable idea as it can dismiss some paradoxes in Quantum Physics. Thank You Love and Light
Is it possible that the reason that String Theory is not complete, is because science is looking at it in the wrong way? Science is trying to squeeze this theory out of the quantum equations. Not to squeeze from, but to add to. Since math and equations are all descriptions of the interactions and movements, there could be something outside these mathematical descriptions that needs to be added. Something outside what has been observed. Not dark energy, nor dark matter as these are all indirectly observed from the interactions of our observation of "matter".
@Maya These journals are peer reviewed and are mostly correct science. What is missing are the interpretations of these mathematical recipes that are accurate to 14 decimal places. It has been over 100 years with the same confusion to what this all means, even with more accurate experiments that were once just thought experiments. There is still no intuition to what is going on. Science is now frustrated and because it is at a loose end is forced to focus on this by bringing this to the public awareness for another way to approach this.
@Maya This is where the foundation of physics plays a pivotal role! There are two leading interpretations: pilot-wave which is a deterministic reality; and the objective quantum collapse which is a nondeterministic reality. Both are using the same equations and yet, each has a different pathway and outcome. No mathemtical technique will solve this. Don't forget that quantum mechanics is not sharp, as it is smeared with probabilities, and general relativity of gravity has defined mass in one location and is sharp to exact time and place. What is missing is not some refined mathematical tool of technique, but something that is outside all these wonderful and accurate equations that has yet to be discovered and thought of.
@Maya Science still does not understand QFT, which is merely a mathematical equations using vectors. Math is simply a description that science uses to support their assumptions of their understanding. Not an objective foundation of physics. What do you think String Theory is doing? String theory is forcing apples to equal oranges by inserting an "outside" concept called "graviton" and getting 11 dimensions. Solving this gravity dilemma comes out of understanding which then leads to the true solution.
@Maya Exactly, a description with no understanding of what is the mechanism for such characteristics. Which is quite interesting as this then points to a fundamental missing link that is outside both the equations with their mathematical techniques, and our current understandings which are probably based on some assumptions that are in error and also pointing us into the wrong direction. Don't forget it was Einstein's insights from thought experiments that led him to redo some assumptions into which lead him down to a more correct pathway in which mathematics and physics subsequently followed.
![โรงเรียนห้ามรัก โดนจับได้ตาย...!! [เอิร์นไดเม่]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4u02Sbr556Q/mqdefault.jpg)
So what you're saying is that String Theory has some loose ends...
Just a small comment. The existence of a tachyon in a quantum theory isn't necessarily problematic. It just signals that you're trying to do perturbation theory around the wrong vacuum. This issue arises e.g. in the Higgs mechanism.
Thank you for educating us on these topics Dr. Paul! :)
Amazing content, I love your eloquency despite all these insanely difficult topics.
If spacetime is implemented by axion like particles, then it should be possible for the Planck plasms breaching the event horizon at the poles of SMBH to push those axions out of the way (or heat them to Planck plasma level) and the jet should then be able to go superluminal. This would explain all those strange jet readings that look superluminal and are explained away as small observing angles (yeah right).
Tachyons are so 1960's. Today we have Pym Particles.
There are 10-99th loops. Looks sorta like Morae' patterns in higher dimensions. The waves are harmonic all the way down to here now. Good luck with that.
I love it. Thank you Paul.
What if gravity is the tachyeon? I mean, nothing can travel through space faster than light, but in General relativity gravity is the curvature of spacetime, and since space can expand faster than light, maybe gravity can also. Take the event horizon of a black hole, gravity pulls so hard light can't escape, but what about further past it, closer to the singularity?
As far as I know, gravity waves that were observed recently traveled at the speed of light.
@@Deus0tiosus I remembered that when I made my comment, and thought if someone knew better they might correct me.
Tachyons exists like black holes do. They are so amazing that must exists like black holes. The problem is that we will probably never be able to probe it, unless black holes that are everywhere and easy to detect.
That thumbnail looks pretty accurate to me. Just remember that when you spin something around its making gravity happen in it's relativistic time template. The momentum is carried by the torsion on the gyrodesic direction of thrust on Euler manifolds. Simple.
Hi Paul, i was wondering if you have any plans of doing a lecture at the Royal Institution, or if you have ever been invited to one?
So much to ponder
One serious question.. in the direct way of Stringcalculation any calculated mass is higher than Planckmass? I heard so..
Very funny to watch the history of science as a soap opera. "In the previous episode...". Who is the vilain? Who will save the day? Will them marry at the end and live happy forever?
By definition, does not everything stop at absolute zero? I am sure that at even a single femtokelvin, something will vibrate, but it does this mean true absolute zero is impossible?
Cool video.
Interesting!
Why don't you try explaining spacetime with a virtual point that expands at the speed of light and have an available EM bandwidth that can become excited. These virtual points, call them Planck units, have units of energy-time. Their surface area A = 4pi(ct)^2 overlap with other Planck units to create "the present". The enclosed volume is "the past". Multiple Planck units, at big bang energies, can overlap to create standard model particles. Try doing it that way!
@@woodypigeon Cold, racist and not very good at physics.
@@woodypigeon my idea is a universe made of light.
Read the Quantum Print there might be strings attached.
Sutter, again with the cliff-hanger! 😖
Perhaps it's better to simplify rather than than complicate
Will this theory help me truss a turkey?
Because there isn't enough love in the world.
Tachions exist the moment you cross over the event horizon into a black hole.
0:04
1960
-2020
-----
over 60 years.
Wow! The rest of your math is good, though, right?
There may be a problem with your understanding of reality.
That misunderstanding may carry-over to everyone in this field.
StrongNuclearForce? And a loss for any sentence that would be of any comprehensible value!
I think you meant the sixties were over fifty years ago :)
Addendum: I was born in 1967 and I am 52 years old, not over 60.
☕
There is no spoon....
Salute my brother 🙏 Bangladesh 🇧🇩 ❤❤ you Alhamdulillah May Allah bless you ❤❤
Hopefully you can address my comments on the speed of Light.
There is no argument about the speed that fluctuates between psychical mediums, But for example, we assume that the speed of light near Alpha Centauri is the same as the speed of light here on Earth. what I'm saying is we just assuming it, we don't know about that right, do we?
The facts are that we cannot know what is going on everywhere in the universe, so we cannot determine that the speed of light (electromagnetic wave speed) is constant!
We can assume different possibilities, (just like we assuming that it is constant), what if light is emitted from someplace near us.
maybe it emitted from the center of the earth.
and maybe is emitted from life. maybe there is million more possibility?
maybe after you laugh for a few seconds you will maybe realize that this is not a completely unbelievable idea as it can dismiss some paradoxes in Quantum Physics.
Thank You
Love and Light
@@woodypigeon I made some model of the universe without knowing what the speed of light really is
.
And those were the conclusions.
Is it possible that the reason that String Theory is not complete, is because science is looking at it in the wrong way? Science is trying to squeeze this theory out of the quantum equations. Not to squeeze from, but to add to. Since math and equations are all descriptions of the interactions and movements, there could be something outside these mathematical descriptions that needs to be added. Something outside what has been observed. Not dark energy, nor dark matter as these are all indirectly observed from the interactions of our observation of "matter".
Your nope is such a scientific, unbiased answer.
@Maya These journals are peer reviewed and are mostly correct science. What is missing are the interpretations of these mathematical recipes that are accurate to 14 decimal places. It has been over 100 years with the same confusion to what this all means, even with more accurate experiments that were once just thought experiments. There is still no intuition to what is going on. Science is now frustrated and because it is at a loose end is forced to focus on this by bringing this to the public awareness for another way to approach this.
@Maya This is where the foundation of physics plays a pivotal role! There are two leading interpretations: pilot-wave which is a deterministic reality; and the objective quantum collapse which is a nondeterministic reality. Both are using the same equations and yet, each has a different pathway and outcome. No mathemtical technique will solve this. Don't forget that quantum mechanics is not sharp, as it is smeared with probabilities, and general relativity of gravity has defined mass in one location and is sharp to exact time and place. What is missing is not some refined mathematical tool of technique, but something that is outside all these wonderful and accurate equations that has yet to be discovered and thought of.
@Maya Science still does not understand QFT, which is merely a mathematical equations using vectors. Math is simply a description that science uses to support their assumptions of their understanding. Not an objective foundation of physics. What do you think String Theory is doing? String theory is forcing apples to equal oranges by inserting an "outside" concept called "graviton" and getting 11 dimensions. Solving this gravity dilemma comes out of understanding which then leads to the true solution.
@Maya Exactly, a description with no understanding of what is the mechanism for such characteristics. Which is quite interesting as this then points to a fundamental missing link that is outside both the equations with their mathematical techniques, and our current understandings which are probably based on some assumptions that are in error and also pointing us into the wrong direction.
Don't forget it was Einstein's insights from thought experiments that led him to redo some assumptions into which lead him down to a more correct pathway in which mathematics and physics subsequently followed.
You physicists are hopelessly lost.
So I guess string theory is a poor candidate for the missing link between relativity and quantum mechanics. The calabi yau is cool though.
String theory is dead man.