I came out of a big box seeker sensative church because I started to actually study the Bible. I wanted something grounded in tradition as well, but only the biblical tradition. I came to understand the doctrines of grace by reading the word and that is why I found a reformed church that conforms to what is in scripture. Tradition isn't bad, it's just got to be a biblical tradition.
the apostles and their predecessors taught certain interpretations, we are to continue in that way people coming up with new interpretations centuries later are not following in the tradition taught by the apostles and early church
That’s exactly right. Everyone has traditions. They just need to be evaluated in the light of scripture, not supersede scripture. That’s where Rome and the EO went wrong, along with many Protestant churches
The Judaizers of the Gospels, Acts and Galatians have been around for a long long time. AKA the synagogue of Satan minimizing and dismissing the clear covenantal teachings of Paul, the Gospel itself.
“Who is the liar? Whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Whoever denies the Father and the Son, this is the antichrist”. The antichrist is NOT a mystery - and the church is worshipping it/them.
The following proves this preacher is correct about Dispensational Theology. New Covenant Whole Gospel: How many modern Christians cannot honestly answer the questions below? Who is the King of Israel in John 1:49? Is the King of Israel now the Head of the Church, and are we His Body? Who is the “son” that is the “heir” to the land in Matthew 21:37-43? Why did God allow the Romans to destroy the Old Covenant temple and the Old Covenant city, about 40 years after His Son fulfilled the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34 in blood at Calvary? What the modern Church needs is a New Covenant Revival (Heb. 9:10) in which members of various denominations are willing to re-examine everything they believe and see if it agrees with the Bible, instead of the traditions of men. We need to be like the Bereans. It will be a battle between our flesh and the Holy Spirit. It will not be easy. If you get mad and upset when someone challenges your man-made Bible doctrines, that is your flesh resisting the truth found in God's Word. Nobody can completely understand the Bible unless they understand the relationship between the Old Covenant given to Moses at Mount Sinai and the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ? (Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30) The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations? 1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Paul’s interpretation in Galatians 3:8, 3:16.) 2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ? 3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds? 4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh? 5. Who is replacing the word “remnant” in Romans 9:27, with the word “nation”? 6. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers? 7. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"? 8. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost? 9. Based on Hebrews 12:18-24, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.) 10. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? 11. Watch the TH-cam video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church. Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology. Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.” Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107. Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.” Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323. John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated… "...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.” John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.) What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16? (See what Joshua said about the Old Covenant land promise in Josh. 21:43.) Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth? Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups? Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and is it fulfilled by the blood of Christ at Calvary in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 12:18-24? Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church, if the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20? (See also 2 Thess. 1:7-10) If the New Covenant has made the Old Covenant “obsolete” in Hebrews 8:6-13, why would God go back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period? Read the recent book "The Rise and Fall of Dispensationalism", by Daniel G. Hummel. .
His Word is True, IT stands against what you wrote. Jeremiah 31: 31 “Behold, days are coming,” declares the LORD, “when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, 32 not like the covenant which I made with their fathers in the day I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, My covenant which they broke, although I was a husband to them,” declares the LORD. 33 “But this is the covenant which I will make with the house of Israel after those days,” declares the LORD, “I will put My law within them and on their heart I will write it; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. 34 They will not teach again, each man his neighbor and each man his brother, saying, ‘Know the LORD,’ for they will all know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them,” declares the LORD, “for I will forgive their iniquity, and their sin I will remember no more.” 35 Thus says the LORD, Who gives the sun for light by day And the fixed order of the moon and the stars for light by night, Who stirs up the sea so that its waves roar; The LORD of hosts is His name: 36 “If this fixed order departs From before Me,” declares the LORD, “Then the offspring of Israel also will cease From being a nation before Me forever.” 37 Thus says the LORD, “If the heavens above can be measured And the foundations of the earth searched out below, Then I will also cast off all the offspring of Israel For all that they have done,” declares the LORD. 38 “Behold, days are coming,” declares the LORD, “when the city will be rebuilt for the LORD from the Tower of Hananel to the Corner Gate. 39 The measuring line will go out farther straight ahead to the hill Gareb; then it will turn to Goah. 40 And the whole valley of the dead bodies and of the ashes, and all the fields as far as the brook Kidron, to the corner of the Horse Gate toward the east, shall be holy to the LORD; it will not be plucked up or overthrown anymore forever.”
@@androidr.8470 The author of the Book of Hebrews starts the passage below with the word "now" and quotes Jer. 31:31-34 word for word showing its fulfillment by Christ during the first century. The NKJV quotes the OT text in Uppercase letters. Heb 8:6 But now He has obtained a more excellent ministry, inasmuch as He is also Mediator of a better covenant, which was established on better promises. Heb 8:7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then no place would have been sought for a second. Heb 8:8 Because finding fault with them, He says: "BEHOLD, THE DAYS ARE COMING, SAYS THE LORD, WHEN I WILL MAKE A NEW COVENANT WITH THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL AND WITH THE HOUSE OF JUDAH- Heb 8:9 NOT ACCORDING TO THE COVENANT THAT I MADE WITH THEIR FATHERS IN THE DAY WHEN I TOOK THEM BY THE HAND TO LEAD THEM OUT OF THE LAND OF EGYPT; BECAUSE THEY DID NOT CONTINUE IN MY COVENANT, AND I DISREGARDED THEM, SAYS THE LORD. Heb 8:10 FOR THIS IS THE COVENANT THAT I WILL MAKE WITH THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL AFTER THOSE DAYS, SAYS THE LORD: I WILL PUT MY LAWS IN THEIR MIND AND WRITE THEM ON THEIR HEARTS; AND I WILL BE THEIR GOD, AND THEY SHALL BE MY PEOPLE. Heb 8:11 NONE OF THEM SHALL TEACH HIS NEIGHBOR, AND NONE HIS BROTHER, SAYING, 'KNOW THE LORD,' FOR ALL SHALL KNOW ME, FROM THE LEAST OF THEM TO THE GREATEST OF THEM. Heb 8:12 FOR I WILL BE MERCIFUL TO THEIR UNRIGHTEOUSNESS, AND THEIR SINS AND THEIR LAWLESS DEEDS I WILL REMEMBER NO MORE." Heb 8:13 In that He says, "A NEW COVENANT," He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away. .
@@SpotterVideo HEBREWS 8:13 In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. *Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.* Is the New Covenant ready to vanish away? The "that which decayeth and waxeth old" is the OLD COVENANT. The New makes the first old. The Old (first) covenant decays and grows old and IS READY to vanish away. The New Covenant is given to the same group of people the FIRST was. THE JEW. Jeremiah 31:31-34 makes no mention that gentiles would be graft into the two houses (Israel and Judah). A New Covenant is given to an 'Adulterous Wife" (Jeremiah 3:8) not a CHASTE BRIDE (2 Cor. 11:2). Why would a "chaste bride" be given a New Covenant? The bride is a VIRGIN, and NEVER BEEN MARRIED. God gave a bill of divorce to ISAREL: JEREMIAH 3:8 And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but went and played the harlot also. God gave the Jew the covenant of Circumcision and the Law. The FIRST Covenant. When the Jew FAILED to keep this covenant, the provision made was the OLD TESTAMENT (blood sacrifices of bulls and goats) and this TESTAMENT cleared the Jew not of sin, but his CONSCIENCE of sin (Hebrews 10:1-4) The gentiles were NEVER given the Old Covenant or the OLD TESTAMENT. Why would they be saved by the NEW COVENANT? Christians are saved by the New TESTAMENT (Jesus Christs' blood). This same New Testament got the righteous dead (both Jew and gentile) out of Abraham's Bosom. The mystery of the Church is that both Jew and Gentile would saved in one body by the cross, by a TESTAMENT: The Christian today is under a New Testament: LUKE 22:19-20 And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me. 20Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you. MATTHEW 26:26-28 And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this is my body. 27And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it; 28For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins. MARK 14:24 And he said unto them, This is my *blood of the new testament,* which is shed for many. 1 Cor. 11:25 After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the *new testament in my blood:* this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me. 2 Cor. 3:6 Who also hath made us able ministers of the *new testament;* not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life. Where the word “covenant” is used Paul uses it in relation to ISRAEL. The Jews who reject the gospel revealed to Paul will be redeemed by the NEW COVENANT. ROMANS 11:23-27 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to *Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.* 26And so *all Israel shall be saved:* as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob: 27For this is *my covenant unto them,* when I shall take away their sins. HEBREWS 9:15-17 And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance. 16For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator. 17For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.The New Testament secures salvation for the Christian today. While the aspects of the New Covenant and the New Testament are very similar, there are differences in who it is for, and at what time. A Covenant and a Testament are not interchangeable words: Covenant: COVENANT, noun [L, to come; a coming together; a meeting or agreement of minds.] 1. A mutual consent or agreement of two or more persons, to do or to forbear some act or thing; a contract; stipulation. A covenant is created by deed in writing, sealed and executed; or it may be implied in the contract. 2. A writing containing the terms of agreement or contract between parties; or the clause of agreement in a deed containing the covenant. Testament: TEST'AMENT, noun [Latin testamentum, from testor, to make a will.] 1. A solemn authentic instrument in writing, by which a person declares his will as to the disposal of his estate and effects after his death. This is otherwise called a will. A testament to be valid, must be made when the testator is of sound mind, and it must be subscribed, witnessed and published in such manner as the law prescribes.
Dispensationalism is literally another gospel. It minimizes Jesus' sacrificial death and inevitably leads to all sorts of conclusions that are directly contradictory to the gospel. Sadly most evangelicals subscribe to Dispensationalism without really even thinking about it
The Doctrine of DISPENSATIONALISM came from the Epistles of St. Paul to Timothy (ref. 2 Tim. 2:15)... regarding "RIGHTLY DIVIDING THE WORD OF TRUTH."... which they have misinterpreted the context and meaning of the Epistle... instead they DIVIDE the TIME (Period) of Dispensation (exclusion) from the Israelite Jews (O.T.) to the Church (N.T.)... which is Non-Biblical... Facts and Truth of the Matters, Biblically and Logically speaking... Praise be to God in Christ Jesus... Amen.
And if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's SEED...Having been born again, not of corruptible SEED, but incorruptible (Gal. 3:29: 1 Pet. 1:23). Christians are the true seed through the Son.
I would love to see a debate between this gentleman or any postmillennialst verses professors (Michael Vlach/Abner Chow) from the Masters Seminary. I have no axe to grind, would just like to see it.
@@danielwarton5343Yes, there are some really weird dispensationalists out there but I have never really seen a true exegetical debate between a very educated postmill and a very educated dispy premiller. I always go back and forth on my eschatological positions but I don’t think people give premillers a fair shake and both amillers and postmillers make straw men arguments against them. I am a amiller by the way, as of right now 😅
@@danielwarton5343yes and no. Unfortunately, there are a lot of people who hold to exactly what they describe. It’s a much smaller minority that hood to “academic dispensationalism”. Of vlach/goemen/etc. So some of the descriptions seem like caricatures, but they’re describing a real mass of people, there’s just a big difference on the spectrum of dispies. But a similar thing goes for cov theology
In His love, God will keep His promises to Israel as a nation and as per Jeremiah 31:36-37. In His love He will restore them at the right time, when the number of the gentiles is in and then all Israel will be saved as Romans 11:26 says. God displays His faithfulness in covenant in that He doesn’t cast of His elect. The cross of Christ is our only salvation and the Nation of Israel will repent and mourn for Him as for an only Son, the one they pierced, Zechariah 12:10…He will pour out the Spirit of grace
“But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring, but “Through Isaac shall your offspring be named.” This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring.” Romans 9:6-8
@@SerenityNow22 and yet again, "And if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to promise." Galatians 3:29. Literally at the beginning of the video.
@@docbrown7513 since you wanted to be technical and annoying, intentionally missing the point, dispensation is not a verb and so cannot be an act. Dispensing is an act. Dispensation is a noun.
This is so excellent!!! Yes, you either get Apache helicopters or McChristianity so they choose Roman Catholicism or Orthodoxy. Thank God I was saved by Grace ALONE and understood that before I even understood what happened to me. However, had I been seeking now??? I’d just start going to a Catholic Church bc at least Catholics seem to at least have a sect that understands how to see our current problems with a Christian lens.
Justification is by faith alone. You are saved by faith alone and repentance in terms of a change of mind from unbelief to belief and trusting in the Lord Jesus Christ's finished work on the cross and resurrection from the dead alone to save you. Repentance from sins is what demonstrates you are a true believer. Obviously no one is perfect and can never truly 100% repent of all sins or any sin to be honest, but what is meant by repenting of your sins is having hatred for sin and desiring to serve God with your life and live for him- you do not desire to live for yourself (Phil. 2:4; Phil. 2:13). Again, to enter into heaven you must have fruit meet for repentance (Matthew 3:8) and you must be born again (John 3:3). The things I just mentioned demonstrate that you are a genuine Christian (Ephesians 2:8-10. Here in this verse we see we are saved by God's grace through faith alone, and this is evident to others in that we bear fruit and do God's Will and become more like out Lord Jesus Christ (grow in sanctification) There is no such thing as a carnal Christian. There is such a thing as a backsliding Christian though).
Well, that was a waste of time. What did any of that sermon have to do with dispensationalism and God destroying it? Was that just some lame clickbait video title?
@@SerenityNow22 There's no reference to dispensationalism in the sermon; even your timestamp says nothing about nor accurately represents dispensationalism. But I guess misrepresentation is the modus operandi of postmils toward dispensationalism today!
If the Jews no longer are a distinct "people of God", then Dispensationalisms main ideas fall apart. God is not particularly interested in the middle east (only interested inasmuch as He is interested in the rest of the world), He does not accept or treat them as an elevated or special people, that God always intended to do away with the older covenants, and that the "People of God" is the church, not Israel. This means there is no reason to believe in the ending that Dispies promote, God does not intend to have a final battle over the state of Isreal, and we have no obligation toward the State of Israel according to scripture.
This channel is OK, and is best sticking with monster topics. When they get into no Dispensationalism and no pre-trib rapture, the devil peaks out and smiles. Sad!! How can some people be so lost.
@@AllforOne_OneforAll1689 2 Concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered to him, we ask you, brothers and sisters, 2 not to become easily unsettled or alarmed by the teaching allegedly from us-whether by a prophecy or by word of mouth or by letter-asserting that the day of the Lord has already come. 3 Don’t let anyone deceive you in any way, for that day will not come until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness[a] is revealed, the man doomed to destruction. 4 He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God. You don't even know the difference between The Day of The Lord, and the Day of Christ. Watch TH-cam video "The Day of Christ and the Day of the Lord-Distinct or Connected?"
I really don’t think there is any honest refutation of dispensational position in this video or in the text, in context paul is dealing with justification by faith? Not eschatology….
Joel is adopted. I have a theory that he pushes White Boy Summer and anti-Zionism so much because he has some non-European ancestry that he doesn’t want people to know about.
@@toolegittoquit_001exactly. Most parrot it’s the last days, rapture ready talk of a dispy without really knowing what it is or that there are at least 3 other major eschatological camps other than it.
I feel the same way. I grew up dispensational and become Presbyterian eventually through first Voddie Baucham, Paul Washer, Joel Beeke and Doug Wilson. I struggle to react/know what to say when a fellow believer says they are dispensational. It’s easy to forget that a lot of people have yet to make it out of that wrong teaching.
@@darkblaze1034honestly amill and post mill have great points. Even historic pre mill is more similar. Dispensationalism is a totally different animal. It’s sad how popular of a teaching it is. Only recently (3 or 4 years ago) I was in the post trib/pre wrath pre mill camp. It’s crazy how even in that camp it has its roots in dispensationalism and I doubt many even are even slightly aware of that.
Agreed. Also, something feels wrong about the way they target people who happen to be born Jews throughout multiple videos as particularly evil, which doesn’t fit into any gospel narrative. It’s more harmful than good. I think it would drive Jewish people away from the gospel seeing as these men make sweeping generalizations about who they are.,
![ไลฟ์สุ่ม iPhone 295 บาท... โกงมั้ย?[ โกงมั้ยครับ ep.97 ] | DOM](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/gdstHEE4UUE/mqdefault.jpg)
Never ever leave your little boy with this guy.
I came out of a big box seeker sensative church because I started to actually study the Bible. I wanted something grounded in tradition as well, but only the biblical tradition. I came to understand the doctrines of grace by reading the word and that is why I found a reformed church that conforms to what is in scripture.
Tradition isn't bad, it's just got to be a biblical tradition.
the apostles and their predecessors taught certain interpretations, we are to continue in that way
people coming up with new interpretations centuries later are not following in the tradition taught by the apostles and early church
That’s exactly right. Everyone has traditions. They just need to be evaluated in the light of scripture, not supersede scripture. That’s where Rome and the EO went wrong, along with many Protestant churches
@@tomtemple69exactly and that’s the problem with Rome and the EO. Centuries later they brought in all manner of man made traditions
The Judaizers of the Gospels, Acts and Galatians have been around for a long long time. AKA the synagogue of Satan minimizing and dismissing the clear covenantal teachings of Paul, the Gospel itself.
“Who is the liar? Whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Whoever denies the Father and the Son, this is the antichrist”. The antichrist is NOT a mystery - and the church is worshipping it/them.
The following proves this preacher is correct about Dispensational Theology.
New Covenant Whole Gospel: How many modern Christians cannot honestly answer the questions below?
Who is the King of Israel in John 1:49? Is the King of Israel now the Head of the Church, and are we His Body? Who is the “son” that is the “heir” to the land in Matthew 21:37-43? Why did God allow the Romans to destroy the Old Covenant temple and the Old Covenant city, about 40 years after His Son fulfilled the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34 in blood at Calvary?
What the modern Church needs is a New Covenant Revival (Heb. 9:10) in which members of various denominations are willing to re-examine everything they believe and see if it agrees with the Bible, instead of the traditions of men. We need to be like the Bereans. It will be a battle between our flesh and the Holy Spirit. It will not be easy. If you get mad and upset when someone challenges your man-made Bible doctrines, that is your flesh resisting the truth found in God's Word. Nobody can completely understand the Bible unless they understand the relationship between the Old Covenant given to Moses at Mount Sinai and the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary
Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ?
(Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30)
The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations?
1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Paul’s interpretation in Galatians 3:8, 3:16.)
2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ?
3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds?
4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh?
5. Who is replacing the word “remnant” in Romans 9:27, with the word “nation”?
6. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers?
7. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"?
8. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost?
9. Based on Hebrews 12:18-24, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.)
10. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis?
11. Watch the TH-cam video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church.
Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology.
Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107.
Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323.
John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated…
"...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.”
John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.)
What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16?
(See what Joshua said about the Old Covenant land promise in Josh. 21:43.)
Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth?
Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups?
Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and is it fulfilled by the blood of Christ at Calvary in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 12:18-24?
Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church, if the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20? (See also 2 Thess. 1:7-10) If the New Covenant has made the Old Covenant “obsolete” in Hebrews 8:6-13, why would God go back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period?
Read the recent book "The Rise and Fall of Dispensationalism", by Daniel G. Hummel.
.
Well cited.
🥱
His Word is True, IT stands against what you wrote.
Jeremiah 31:
31 “Behold, days are coming,” declares the LORD, “when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, 32 not like the covenant which I made with their fathers in the day I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, My covenant which they broke, although I was a husband to them,” declares the LORD. 33 “But this is the covenant which I will make with the house of Israel after those days,” declares the LORD, “I will put My law within them and on their heart I will write it; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. 34 They will not teach again, each man his neighbor and each man his brother, saying, ‘Know the LORD,’ for they will all know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them,” declares the LORD, “for I will forgive their iniquity, and their sin I will remember no more.”
35
Thus says the LORD,
Who gives the sun for light by day
And the fixed order of the moon and the stars for light by night,
Who stirs up the sea so that its waves roar;
The LORD of hosts is His name:
36
“If this fixed order departs
From before Me,” declares the LORD,
“Then the offspring of Israel also will cease
From being a nation before Me forever.”
37 Thus says the LORD,
“If the heavens above can be measured
And the foundations of the earth searched out below,
Then I will also cast off all the offspring of Israel
For all that they have done,” declares the LORD.
38 “Behold, days are coming,” declares the LORD, “when the city will be rebuilt for the LORD from the Tower of Hananel to the Corner Gate. 39 The measuring line will go out farther straight ahead to the hill Gareb; then it will turn to Goah. 40 And the whole valley of the dead bodies and of the ashes, and all the fields as far as the brook Kidron, to the corner of the Horse Gate toward the east, shall be holy to the LORD; it will not be plucked up or overthrown anymore forever.”
@@androidr.8470
The author of the Book of Hebrews starts the passage below with the word "now" and quotes Jer. 31:31-34 word for word showing its fulfillment by Christ during the first century. The NKJV quotes the OT text in Uppercase letters.
Heb 8:6 But now He has obtained a more excellent ministry, inasmuch as He is also Mediator of a better covenant, which was established on better promises.
Heb 8:7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then no place would have been sought for a second.
Heb 8:8 Because finding fault with them, He says: "BEHOLD, THE DAYS ARE COMING, SAYS THE LORD, WHEN I WILL MAKE A NEW COVENANT WITH THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL AND WITH THE HOUSE OF JUDAH-
Heb 8:9 NOT ACCORDING TO THE COVENANT THAT I MADE WITH THEIR FATHERS IN THE DAY WHEN I TOOK THEM BY THE HAND TO LEAD THEM OUT OF THE LAND OF EGYPT; BECAUSE THEY DID NOT CONTINUE IN MY COVENANT, AND I DISREGARDED THEM, SAYS THE LORD.
Heb 8:10 FOR THIS IS THE COVENANT THAT I WILL MAKE WITH THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL AFTER THOSE DAYS, SAYS THE LORD: I WILL PUT MY LAWS IN THEIR MIND AND WRITE THEM ON THEIR HEARTS; AND I WILL BE THEIR GOD, AND THEY SHALL BE MY PEOPLE.
Heb 8:11 NONE OF THEM SHALL TEACH HIS NEIGHBOR, AND NONE HIS BROTHER, SAYING, 'KNOW THE LORD,' FOR ALL SHALL KNOW ME, FROM THE LEAST OF THEM TO THE GREATEST OF THEM.
Heb 8:12 FOR I WILL BE MERCIFUL TO THEIR UNRIGHTEOUSNESS, AND THEIR SINS AND THEIR LAWLESS DEEDS I WILL REMEMBER NO MORE."
Heb 8:13 In that He says, "A NEW COVENANT," He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.
.
@@SpotterVideo HEBREWS 8:13
In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. *Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.*
Is the New Covenant ready to vanish away? The "that which decayeth and waxeth old" is the OLD COVENANT.
The New makes the first old. The Old (first) covenant decays and grows old and IS READY to vanish away.
The New Covenant is given to the same group of people the FIRST was. THE JEW. Jeremiah 31:31-34 makes no mention that gentiles would be graft into the two houses (Israel and Judah).
A New Covenant is given to an 'Adulterous Wife" (Jeremiah 3:8) not a CHASTE BRIDE (2 Cor. 11:2).
Why would a "chaste bride" be given a New Covenant? The bride is a VIRGIN, and NEVER BEEN MARRIED. God gave a bill of divorce to ISAREL:
JEREMIAH 3:8
And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a bill of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but went and played the harlot also.
God gave the Jew the covenant of Circumcision and the Law. The FIRST Covenant.
When the Jew FAILED to keep this covenant, the provision made was the OLD TESTAMENT (blood sacrifices of bulls and goats) and this TESTAMENT cleared the Jew not of sin, but his CONSCIENCE of sin (Hebrews 10:1-4)
The gentiles were NEVER given the Old Covenant or the OLD TESTAMENT. Why would they be saved by the NEW COVENANT?
Christians are saved by the New TESTAMENT (Jesus Christs' blood).
This same New Testament got the righteous dead (both Jew and gentile) out of Abraham's Bosom.
The mystery of the Church is that both Jew and Gentile would saved in one body by the cross, by a TESTAMENT:
The Christian today is under a New Testament:
LUKE 22:19-20
And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me. 20Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you.
MATTHEW 26:26-28
And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this is my body. 27And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it; 28For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.
MARK 14:24
And he said unto them, This is my *blood of the new testament,* which is shed for many.
1 Cor. 11:25
After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the *new testament in my blood:* this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me.
2 Cor. 3:6
Who also hath made us able ministers of the *new testament;* not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.
Where the word “covenant” is used Paul uses it in relation to ISRAEL. The Jews who reject the gospel revealed to Paul will be redeemed by the NEW COVENANT.
ROMANS 11:23-27
For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to *Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.* 26And so *all Israel shall be saved:* as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob: 27For this is *my covenant unto them,* when I shall take away their sins.
HEBREWS 9:15-17
And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance. 16For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator. 17For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.The New Testament secures salvation for the Christian today. While the aspects of the New Covenant and the New Testament are very similar, there are differences in who it is for, and at what time.
A Covenant and a Testament are not interchangeable words:
Covenant:
COVENANT, noun [L, to come; a coming together; a meeting or agreement of minds.] 1. A mutual consent or agreement of two or more persons, to do or to forbear some act or thing; a contract; stipulation. A covenant is created by deed in writing, sealed and executed; or it may be implied in the contract. 2. A writing containing the terms of agreement or contract between parties; or the clause of agreement in a deed containing the covenant.
Testament:
TEST'AMENT, noun [Latin testamentum, from testor, to make a will.] 1. A solemn authentic instrument in writing, by which a person declares his will as to the disposal of his estate and effects after his death. This is otherwise called a will. A testament to be valid, must be made when the testator is of sound mind, and it must be subscribed, witnessed and published in such manner as the law prescribes.
Great message!
Dispensationalism is literally another gospel. It minimizes Jesus' sacrificial death and inevitably leads to all sorts of conclusions that are directly contradictory to the gospel. Sadly most evangelicals subscribe to Dispensationalism without really even thinking about it
It’s no Gospel at all, it’s a Cult. Cheering on what’s going on is evil. They need to snap out of it.
Please welcome our guest Dick Butkus
The Doctrine of DISPENSATIONALISM came from the Epistles of St. Paul to Timothy (ref. 2 Tim. 2:15)... regarding "RIGHTLY DIVIDING THE WORD OF TRUTH."... which they have misinterpreted the context and meaning of the Epistle... instead they DIVIDE the TIME (Period) of Dispensation (exclusion) from the Israelite Jews (O.T.) to the Church (N.T.)... which is Non-Biblical... Facts and Truth of the Matters, Biblically and Logically speaking... Praise be to God in Christ Jesus... Amen.
He addresses the concept that Israel has their own land… and he refutes it. That is part of dispensationalism.
I really liked this guy in Super Troopers
So you are gay?
And if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's SEED...Having been born again, not of corruptible SEED, but incorruptible (Gal. 3:29: 1 Pet. 1:23). Christians are the true seed through the Son.
I'd say Christ himself is the seed. We are the seed insofar as we are the body of Christ.
I would love to see a debate between this gentleman or any postmillennialst verses professors (Michael Vlach/Abner Chow) from the Masters Seminary. I have no axe to grind, would just like to see it.
I agree
The caricature of dispensationalism by these guys always shows their lack of understanding on it
@@danielwarton5343Yes, there are some really weird dispensationalists out there but I have never really seen a true exegetical debate between a very educated postmill and a very educated dispy premiller. I always go back and forth on my eschatological positions but I don’t think people give premillers a fair shake and both amillers and postmillers make straw men arguments against them.
I am a amiller by the way, as of right now 😅
@@danielwarton5343yes and no. Unfortunately, there are a lot of people who hold to exactly what they describe. It’s a much smaller minority that hood to “academic dispensationalism”. Of vlach/goemen/etc. So some of the descriptions seem like caricatures, but they’re describing a real mass of people, there’s just a big difference on the spectrum of dispies. But a similar thing goes for cov theology
Postmil and premil are both wrong
Postmil and premil are both wrong
Honey, wake up! Tom Sellick is preaching at Joel Webbon's church!
😂
Nice! I went with Dick Butkus.
In His love, God will keep His promises to Israel as a nation and as per Jeremiah 31:36-37. In His love He will restore them at the right time, when the number of the gentiles is in and then all Israel will be saved as Romans 11:26 says. God displays His faithfulness in covenant in that He doesn’t cast of His elect. The cross of Christ is our only salvation and the Nation of Israel will repent and mourn for Him as for an only Son, the one they pierced, Zechariah 12:10…He will pour out the Spirit of grace
“But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring, but “Through Isaac shall your offspring be named.” This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring.”
Romans 9:6-8
@@SerenityNow22amen
@@SerenityNow22 and yet again, "And if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to promise." Galatians 3:29. Literally at the beginning of the video.
In his kindness he will also destroy futurism.
If Trump was king, he’d be like Ahab.
Dispensation : license to do what is forbidden by vows or canons .
Actually it just means the act of dispensing
So when it says it in the scriptures do you just skip to the vows instead?
It means economy and speaks of God’s outworking.
@@docbrown7513 since you wanted to be technical and annoying, intentionally missing the point, dispensation is not a verb and so cannot be an act. Dispensing is an act. Dispensation is a noun.
This is so excellent!!! Yes, you either get Apache helicopters or McChristianity so they choose Roman Catholicism or Orthodoxy. Thank God I was saved by Grace ALONE and understood that before I even understood what happened to me. However, had I been seeking now??? I’d just start going to a Catholic Church bc at least Catholics seem to at least have a sect that understands how to see our current problems with a Christian lens.
Does the speaker have a paper on this sermon? ( and no not the transcript)
This was good. But not about dispensationalism
In order to be saved / justified / forgiven does scripture say you have to “turn from your sins”. Or does it say “ believe”.
Yes
Repent of your sins . believe gets you everlasting life , not a free ride to heaven... Their is a contingency to grace . it's not an unmerited favor.
@@Davidsavage8008That would make it a work, if I have any merit for heaven it is in Christ alone.
Justification is by faith alone. You are saved by faith alone and repentance in terms of a change of mind from unbelief to belief and trusting in the Lord Jesus Christ's finished work on the cross and resurrection from the dead alone to save you.
Repentance from sins is what demonstrates you are a true believer. Obviously no one is perfect and can never truly 100% repent of all sins or any sin to be honest, but what is meant by repenting of your sins is having hatred for sin and desiring to serve God with your life and live for him- you do not desire to live for yourself (Phil. 2:4; Phil. 2:13).
Again, to enter into heaven you must have fruit meet for repentance (Matthew 3:8) and you must be born again (John 3:3). The things I just mentioned demonstrate that you are a genuine Christian (Ephesians 2:8-10. Here in this verse we see we are saved by God's grace through faith alone, and this is evident to others in that we bear fruit and do God's Will and become more like out Lord Jesus Christ (grow in sanctification) There is no such thing as a carnal Christian. There is such a thing as a backsliding Christian though).
@@Davidsavage8008the definition of grace is unmeritted favor
Well, that was a waste of time. What did any of that sermon have to do with dispensationalism and God destroying it? Was that just some lame clickbait video title?
Christians should be honest in all their dealings. This video title ain’t it.
27:37
It’s a bit of a click bait title but the sermon is showing how dispensationalism is incorrect.
@@SerenityNow22 There's no reference to dispensationalism in the sermon; even your timestamp says nothing about nor accurately represents dispensationalism. But I guess misrepresentation is the modus operandi of postmils toward dispensationalism today!
If the Jews no longer are a distinct "people of God", then Dispensationalisms main ideas fall apart. God is not particularly interested in the middle east (only interested inasmuch as He is interested in the rest of the world), He does not accept or treat them as an elevated or special people, that God always intended to do away with the older covenants, and that the "People of God" is the church, not Israel. This means there is no reason to believe in the ending that Dispies promote, God does not intend to have a final battle over the state of Isreal, and we have no obligation toward the State of Israel according to scripture.
This especially rules out the John Hagees and company that believe Jews are saved because of their blood and adherence to the Old Covenants
Watch the video. Listen harder.
This channel is OK, and is best sticking with monster topics. When they get into no Dispensationalism and no pre-trib rapture, the devil peaks out and smiles. Sad!!
How can some people be so lost.
Pre trib and disp are not taught in scripture, its mythology, your camp are the flat earthers of the church.
You need to read 2 Thessalonians 2. It completely denies there will be a pretrib rapture of the church...
100%
@@AllforOne_OneforAll1689 2 Concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered to him, we ask you, brothers and sisters, 2 not to become easily unsettled or alarmed by the teaching allegedly from us-whether by a prophecy or by word of mouth or by letter-asserting that the day of the Lord has already come. 3 Don’t let anyone deceive you in any way, for that day will not come until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness[a] is revealed, the man doomed to destruction. 4 He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God.
You don't even know the difference between The Day of The Lord, and the Day of Christ.
Watch TH-cam video "The Day of Christ and the Day of the Lord-Distinct or Connected?"
No sound!!
That happens when you listen right away after it is posted.
@@John14Verse6 good to know! Thanks!!
Must be audio issues on your end .. sounds good here
Yes there is. It’s the sound of a child making a shambles of the Lord’s day.
I really don’t think there is any honest refutation of dispensational position in this video or in the text, in context paul is dealing with justification by faith? Not eschatology….
This is what passes for a preacher today?
Hey! Now that’s Eddie Munster’s BFF! Be nice!
It's titles like this that cause division in the church.
It's teaching of unbiblical theology that causes division in the Church.
Is this just stand up?
Joel is adopted. I have a theory that he pushes White Boy Summer and anti-Zionism so much because he has some non-European ancestry that he doesn’t want people to know about.
Interesting !!
Maybe. He certainly does not like Israel.
Dispensationalism? What is this...1960? Is Dispensationalism still a thing?
And it's growing in impact given that 90% of Evangelicals subscribe to it - most unknowingly 😕
@@toolegittoquit_001exactly. Most parrot it’s the last days, rapture ready talk of a dispy without really knowing what it is or that there are at least 3 other major eschatological camps other than it.
I feel the same way. I grew up dispensational and become Presbyterian eventually through first Voddie Baucham, Paul Washer, Joel Beeke and Doug Wilson. I struggle to react/know what to say when a fellow believer says they are dispensational. It’s easy to forget that a lot of people have yet to make it out of that wrong teaching.
@@darkblaze1034honestly amill and post mill have great points. Even historic pre mill is more similar. Dispensationalism is a totally different animal. It’s sad how popular of a teaching it is. Only recently (3 or 4 years ago) I was in the post trib/pre wrath pre mill camp. It’s crazy how even in that camp it has its roots in dispensationalism and I doubt many even are even slightly aware of that.
Sadly... yes.
Using the gospel to divide people. Shameful and misguided.
Agreed.
Also, something feels wrong about the way they target people who happen to be born Jews throughout multiple videos as particularly evil, which doesn’t fit into any gospel narrative. It’s more harmful than good. I think it would drive Jewish people away from the gospel seeing as these men make sweeping generalizations about who they are.,