PODMAN: Why it's the Future of Containers (examples included)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ส.ค. 2024
- Is Docker Outdated? Why Podman Is the Future of Containers!
In today's video, we explore the essentials of PODMAN! From understanding its unique architecture to mastering rootless container management, discover how PodMan is revolutionizing container orchestration. We provide practical examples that will enhance your container management skills.
/ @techfun-dementals to subscribe
What You'll Learn:
1- An introduction to PodMan and its role in container management.
2- Explore the security benefits and differences.
3- A deep dive into PodMan's robust architecture.
4- Essential commands for efficient container management.
5- Simplifying container orchestration with PodMan pods.
0:00 - Intro
0:42 - Why Containers
1:30 - What is Podman
3:44 - Root vs. Rootless
6:16 - PodMan Architecture
7:10 - PodMan Commands
8:14 - PodMan Pods
10:21 - Conclusion
/ @techfun-dementals to subscribe
Subscribe for PodMan, Docker, and Containers. Inspired by TechWorld with Nana, Fireship, and NetworkChuck.
/ @techfun-dementals to subscribe
Don't miss out on these crucial PodMan insights and practical examples. Subscribe for more tech tutorials and insights that you won't find anywhere else!
/ @techfun-dementals to subscribe
#podman #docker #containers #rootless #architecture #commands #tech #tutorial #clusters #automation #deployment #devops #components #computerscience - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
This feels fully AI generated.
We do use AI to proofread our scripts, which may result in some changes. Also, we strive to make our scripts easy to understand for non-English listeners. Thank you for your feedback!
@@TechFUN-dementals "why did the Docker container go to therapy? It had too many issues to handle" definitely falls flat on the punchline the way an AI joke does
I know about the PodMan, but I don't know if I'll ever use it. And too much Musk
Thanks for the feedback
One suggestion
Remove elon, and some jokes that are too distracted from the main informative sections.
Information density is very low. Same video can be easily compressed down to 5-6 minutes.
Thank you for watching the video and providing feedback. We are trying to mix our videos with information and some elements of entertainment/humor. But we will take that feedback into consideration.
I am very interested in using Podman, but I had a lot of issues trying to setup Kubernetes to orchestrate Podman containers.
We will try to cover that in our future videos. Thank you for your comment!
Everybody's gangsta until you need swarm.
Docker + wasi/wasm is promising.
It works directly with the Kernel in Linux, but, like Docker, if you install Podman on Mac or Windows, it has to run everything in a VM. Didn't know about creating pods for Kubernetes. Will have to look more into that. One more important distinction that impacts our errant colleagues who insist on developing in Mac/Windows: Podman Desktop for those systems is still 100% open source and free, while Docker Desktop for those machines includes non-free, proprietary code and charges licensing fees for larger teams.
Thought it was funny how you kept changing your pronunciation of Redis, BTW.
Thank you for sharing your insights!
❤Best
Thanks for taking time to watch and providing feedback.
Podman is actually at its best when you run it in rootful mode. In rootless mode it uses a bunch of workarounds to make overlay filesystems, networks, and other stuff work, which has a high performance cost and causes some things to just break (for example, instead of just making a network bridge I have a slirp4netns process eating half of my CPU when under load).
I'm annoyed to see rootless being pushed as a safety benefit, imo the client server model is a better overall model imo because it does partial privileges better without having to cut corners for security reasons, podmans model is everything or nothing. I like nerdctl better as a "docker clone", but podman has really nice deployment options with the kube files and quadlets that make up for its downsides, and rootless podman can run in places where docker runs into issues.
There is always a trade-off between security and performance (cost) as CIA explains. However, rootless containers align better with security compliance requirements and auditing standards. Regulatory frameworks and security best practices recommend\mandate running applications with the least necessary privileges.
We appreciate your feedback and hope this explanation helps you understand why rootless mode is being promoted for its security advantages.
go for Kubernetes in that case K8s or K3s.
BUT...is it written in Rust?
Go.
Maybe the presentation can be simplified further.
Thanks for taking time to watch and providing feedback. We'll try to do better with the next video we create and appreciate any feedback.
Why the boilerplate music? 😂 What on earth
Thanks for watching and the feedback.
This video is by far the best comparison between docker and podman. Thanks
Thanks for the feedback
The text over the slides is annoying,
Jokes are good. Enjoyed the class.
Thanks for watching and providing feedback.
I liked the Elon jokes
This video is a waste of time what is the point in making a video about the technology that doesn't have the significant market share and trying to push it on people claiming that it's the best. When it gets to market dominance then we will talk.
Thank you for your feedback, however, you definitely were interested in finding another containerization solution that ended up with our video. So, I hope this video has helped you in any paths you'd like to go either it's Docker or Podman.
this ain’t it chief 😂
Annoying video
Thanks for watching and appreciate the feedback. Anything specific that you found annoying? And is there anything you liked about it?
bad use of more than half of the analogies
Thanks for taking time to watch and providing feedback. We'll try to do better with every video we create and appreciate any feedback.
Elon is fine, dont listen to other comments. Good try
Thanks for taking time to watch and providing feedback.