I really recommend reading the book, its astronomically mind-blowing, almost life-altering. And next time, please show the pictures he's showing all the time. It's not really interesting looking only at the speaker when a picture related to what's described or spoken about is being shown...
***** dark matter and dark energy are both "positive"[expanding] and "negative"[self-consuming] conducts (behaviours) (due to time-flow rate or "rate of the flow of time") of Frank Wilczek's grid the grid is "relativistic" though, also granular, that's why we cannot measure a huge polarity on it [well of course we can detect some polarity, but granularity and relativity (among particles or chromodynamic oscillations) kills most of that polatization, but not all of it]Frank play your cards, you have an ace, but we need better mathematical support, and a "grid granular field" to achieve the "theory of everything"We should "play" mixing types of the fundamental forces, applied on Hilbert space, and we should describe conditions inside the "chomodynamic condensation mechanisms" via discrete mathematics - combinatorics.The "flow" of chromodynamic noise, is constituted by vectorized points, with different potential. The chromodynamic hot-spots, the dense parts of the chromodynamic wave, are constituted by vectorized points with "broken symmetry" [we have to mimic the Higgs methods of broken symmetry on the Wilczek-grid]. The dark cold-spots of the chromodynamicWilczek-grid have non-broken symmetry. These vectorized points don't move with continuity but move in a quantized manner, only iff they cross with the granular grid, also all vectorized points act in groups (operation of set of elements to reveal the next vectorized spots on the grid) - we have to apply "group integration" or grid-calculus. If we don't complete grid-calculus others will, for Frank was exact.We need to do three things.1. evolve grid-calculus 2. evolve grid-calculus 3. evolve grid-calculus or we have to create a grid-calculus method
I hope lots of people care about “pure” particle theorists like him. Ed Witten and other string theorists are remarkable and string theory had an enormous impact on math and other areas of physics, however, as for contribution to particle physics, no string theorists can beat particle theorists since string theory per se has no predictions or indications which validates the correctness of itself.
That cat in the box question is a repeat in another format, of Shakespeare's Hamlet, "To be or not to be", and that was derived from Greek philosophy, and so back to "Who am I " ? when a disembodied image of one's self is reflected in a pool, ..and leaves a shadow, but questioner and shadow disappears each night to return next morning. What's in the gap? Or, why ask why? The Uncertainty Principle is derived from the same problem of position/existence in a contextual body, and life/activity integrated with the universe. And the GUT of intersections of forces at a particular graphical point, is the same as the active universe existing/suspended in nothing, converging-emitting by reflection at the vanishing point of this superposition. It's a question of how Quantum Fields intersect to interact at the significant constant identities of phenomena, and "work" by physical "laws". The "centre of being" of continuing thought is a relatively high-frequency activity in the brain, and that's congruent with the arrangement of position-momentum objectives that are the tuned elements of spacetime structures. The "distance" formulation of space is divided by the reciprocal mass-particle complex into a unitary/synchronous whole operation, around that vanishing point, ..a singularity floating in nothing, ...superposition. The laws of Physics allow that the mind-body memory is time-shifted to other frequency integration duration context, that's the principle of modulation in a complete context and it's measurable in association with frequency modulation in brain-body sensory experience. Where's the evidence?, (of other states of being, in a united whole), ..that is the question, and what is worth retaining anyway?
Axion field due to asymptotic freedom symmetry ch=E*L of tachyon field at Atom’s scale ch=(2*A*137.036*pm*c^2)*(4*3.14*A*137.036)=13.6*e/10973731 deduce 1.602*10^-19/ch/pm^2=0.85*10^-4*e for Axion.(c=299792458, h=6.62607*10^-34, A=5.29177*10^-11, pm=1.67262*10^-27, e=1.602*10^-19)
Oh vaya, como no me sorprende. Premio Nobel 2012 , descubre la "clave" probablemente para un avance mundial increíble que son los Cristales del Tiempo, es un Genio!...... Solo 128 likes, 5 comentarios, y al parecer solo 14K personas con cerebro en el planeta????????............. Oh claro esperen ahora lo recuerdo, EL NO ES FUTBOLISTA, ACTOR, CANTANTE, no tiene que enseñar el 60% (o mas ) de su cuerpo para llamar la atención, naa, el es solo un Genio, al parecer "especie humana" mas odiada pero irónicamente mas productiva del planeta. Sigan viendo sus telenovelas pendejit@s, gracias a estas grandes mentes la humanidad verdaderamente avanza. Aplausos para este gran caballero, que algún día espero tener el honor de conocerlo y trabajar con él. (Todo es posible :) ......... Excelente conferencia, gracias Google por compartirlo!
dark matter and dark energy are both "positive"[expanding] and "negative"[self-consuming] conducts (behaviours) (due to time-flow rate or "rate of the flow of time") of Frank Wilczek's grid the grid is "relativistic" though, also granular, that's why we cannot measure a huge polarity on it [well of course we can detect some polarity, but granularity and relativity (among particles or chromodynamic oscillations) kills most of that polatization, but not all of it] Frank play your cards, you have an ace, but we need better mathematical support, and a "grid granular field" to achieve the "theory of everything" We should "play" mixing types of the fundamental forces, applied on Hilbert space, and we should describe conditions inside the "chomodynamic condensation mechanisms" via discrete mathematics - combinatorics. The "flow" of chromodynamic noise, is constituted by vectorized points, with different potential. The chromodynamic hot-spots, the dense parts of the chromodynamic wave, are constituted by vectorized points with "broken symmetry" [we have to mimic the Higgs methods of broken symmetry on the Wilczek-grid]. The dark cold-spots of the chromodynamicWilczek-grid have non-broken symmetry. These vectorized points don't move with continuity but move in a quantized manner, only iff they cross with the granular grid, also all vectorized points act in groups (operation of set of elements to reveal the next vectorized spots on the grid) - we have to apply "group integration" or grid-calculus. If we don't complete grid-calculus others will, for Frank was exact. We need to do three things. 1. evolve grid-calculus 2. evolve grid-calculus 3. evolve grid-calculus or we have to create a grid-calculus method
*The worship of beauty and its fallacy.* He confuses intuition with beauty. For beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, in other words, it is subjective and not objective, remember the ‘epicycles’ they were beautiful but wrong! *”It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong.”* Richard P. Feynman
I don't think he claims it to be objective. He's saying that we (or most of us at least) happen to find the fundamentals of physics (which indeed agree with experiment) beautiful. Not merely intuitive, but beautiful.
I really recommend reading the book, its astronomically mind-blowing, almost life-altering. And next time, please show the pictures he's showing all the time. It's not really interesting looking only at the speaker when a picture related to what's described or spoken about is being shown...
It begins at 1:45
Bravo!
***** dark matter and dark energy are both "positive"[expanding] and "negative"[self-consuming] conducts (behaviours) (due to time-flow rate or "rate of the flow of time") of Frank Wilczek's grid
the grid is "relativistic" though, also granular, that's why we cannot measure a huge polarity on it [well of course we can detect some polarity, but granularity and relativity (among particles or chromodynamic oscillations) kills most of that polatization, but not all of it]Frank play your cards, you have an ace, but we need better mathematical support, and a "grid granular field" to achieve the "theory of everything"We should "play" mixing types of the fundamental forces, applied on Hilbert space, and we should describe conditions inside the "chomodynamic condensation mechanisms" via discrete mathematics - combinatorics.The "flow" of chromodynamic noise, is constituted by vectorized points, with different potential. The chromodynamic hot-spots, the dense parts of the chromodynamic wave, are constituted by vectorized points with "broken symmetry" [we have to mimic the Higgs methods of broken symmetry on the Wilczek-grid]. The dark cold-spots of the chromodynamicWilczek-grid have non-broken symmetry. These vectorized points don't move with continuity but move in a quantized manner, only iff they cross with the granular grid, also all vectorized points act in groups (operation of set of elements to reveal the next vectorized spots on the grid) - we have to apply "group integration" or grid-calculus.
If we don't complete grid-calculus others will, for Frank was exact.We need to do three things.1. evolve grid-calculus 2. evolve grid-calculus 3. evolve grid-calculus
or we have to create a grid-calculus method
I hope lots of people care about “pure” particle theorists like him. Ed Witten and other string theorists are remarkable and string theory had an enormous impact on math and other areas of physics, however, as for contribution to particle physics, no string theorists can beat particle theorists since string theory per se has no predictions or indications which validates the correctness of itself.
mygod this is wonderful! thankyou for this!
I have nothing to do with it.
What a genious is Wilczek. Extremely intelligent ideas. Beatifull exposition.
indeed BRAVO, super Frank
That cat in the box question is a repeat in another format, of Shakespeare's Hamlet, "To be or not to be", and that was derived from Greek philosophy, and so back to "Who am I " ? when a disembodied image of one's self is reflected in a pool, ..and leaves a shadow, but questioner and shadow disappears each night to return next morning. What's in the gap? Or, why ask why?
The Uncertainty Principle is derived from the same problem of position/existence in a contextual body, and life/activity integrated with the universe.
And the GUT of intersections of forces at a particular graphical point, is the same as the active universe existing/suspended in nothing, converging-emitting by reflection at the vanishing point of this superposition.
It's a question of how Quantum Fields intersect to interact at the significant constant identities of phenomena, and "work" by physical "laws".
The "centre of being" of continuing thought is a relatively high-frequency activity in the brain, and that's congruent with the arrangement of position-momentum objectives that are the tuned elements of spacetime structures.
The "distance" formulation of space is divided by the reciprocal mass-particle complex into a unitary/synchronous whole operation, around that vanishing point, ..a singularity floating in nothing, ...superposition.
The laws of Physics allow that the mind-body memory is time-shifted to other frequency integration duration context, that's the principle of modulation in a complete context and it's measurable in association with frequency modulation in brain-body sensory experience.
Where's the evidence?, (of other states of being, in a united whole), ..that is the question, and what is worth retaining anyway?
@@rafay8516 Come on, it's plain English
Frank is a pimp on a cosmic level
Axion field due to asymptotic freedom symmetry ch=E*L of tachyon field at Atom’s scale ch=(2*A*137.036*pm*c^2)*(4*3.14*A*137.036)=13.6*e/10973731 deduce 1.602*10^-19/ch/pm^2=0.85*10^-4*e for Axion.(c=299792458, h=6.62607*10^-34, A=5.29177*10^-11, pm=1.67262*10^-27, e=1.602*10^-19)
I liked the tone of the book.
World’s least enthusiastic intro ever lol. 💜
Oh vaya, como no me sorprende. Premio Nobel 2012 , descubre la "clave" probablemente para un avance mundial increíble que son los Cristales del Tiempo, es un Genio!...... Solo 128 likes, 5 comentarios, y al parecer solo 14K personas con cerebro en el planeta????????............. Oh claro esperen ahora lo recuerdo, EL NO ES FUTBOLISTA, ACTOR, CANTANTE, no tiene que enseñar el 60% (o mas ) de su cuerpo para llamar la atención, naa, el es solo un Genio, al parecer "especie humana" mas odiada pero irónicamente mas productiva del planeta. Sigan viendo sus telenovelas pendejit@s, gracias a estas grandes mentes la humanidad verdaderamente avanza. Aplausos para este gran caballero, que algún día espero tener el honor de conocerlo y trabajar con él. (Todo es posible :) ......... Excelente conferencia, gracias Google por compartirlo!
dark matter and dark energy are both "positive"[expanding] and "negative"[self-consuming] conducts (behaviours) (due to time-flow rate or "rate of the flow of time") of Frank Wilczek's grid
the grid is "relativistic" though, also granular, that's why we cannot measure a huge polarity on it [well of course we can detect some polarity, but granularity and relativity (among particles or chromodynamic oscillations) kills most of that polatization, but not all of it]
Frank play your cards, you have an ace, but we need better mathematical support, and a "grid granular field" to achieve the "theory of everything"
We should "play" mixing types of the fundamental forces, applied on Hilbert space, and we should describe conditions inside the "chomodynamic condensation mechanisms" via discrete mathematics - combinatorics.
The "flow" of chromodynamic noise, is constituted by vectorized points, with different potential. The chromodynamic hot-spots, the dense parts of the chromodynamic wave, are constituted by vectorized points with "broken symmetry" [we have to mimic the Higgs methods of broken symmetry on the Wilczek-grid]. The dark cold-spots of the chromodynamicWilczek-grid have non-broken symmetry. These vectorized points don't move with continuity but move in a quantized manner, only iff they cross with the granular grid, also all vectorized points act in groups (operation of set of elements to reveal the next vectorized spots on the grid) - we have to apply "group integration" or grid-calculus.
If we don't complete grid-calculus others will, for Frank was exact.
We need to do three things.
1. evolve grid-calculus 2. evolve grid-calculus 3. evolve grid-calculus
or we have to create a grid-calculus method
I think you need a flux capacitor for that to work.
@@saganworshipper6062 Lmao
I wanna go to church, I love Jesus
Your religion and physics don't match.
This announcer has a weak voice.
*The worship of beauty and its fallacy.* He confuses intuition with beauty.
For beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, in other words, it is subjective and not objective, remember the ‘epicycles’ they were beautiful but wrong! *”It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong.”*
Richard P. Feynman
I don't think he claims it to be objective. He's saying that we (or most of us at least) happen to find the fundamentals of physics (which indeed agree with experiment) beautiful. Not merely intuitive, but beautiful.